Influenza vaccine antibody responses in lung transplant recipients

CONTEXT: Lung transplant recipients are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza infection because of altered lung physiology and immunosuppression. Annual influenza immunization is recommended, but the ability to mount an antibody response may be limited by immunosuppressant medications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the antibody response rate to influenza vaccine in lung transplant recipients to healthy controls. DESIGN: Open label study. SETTING: Lung transplant clinic and General Clinical Research Center at a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixty-eight single and bilateral lung transplant recipients and 35 healthy controls were enrolled in October and November 2002. METHODS: Each individual underwent blood sampling before receiving the 2002-2003 influenza vaccine and 4 weeks later. Influenza antibody concentrations were measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Vaccine response rates (antibody concentration >40 hemagglutination units and at least 4-fold increase in antibody concentration) were compared using chi2. The influence of specific immunosuppressants on vaccine response was compared. RESULTS: The influenza vaccine response rate for lung transplant recipients was 29/68 (43%) and 22/35 (63%) for the healthy individuals (P < .05; chi2). Among the recipients, mycophenolate mofetil was associated with poorer influenza vaccine antibody response (> 40 hemagglutination units) (62% vs 91%; P = .01), whereas sirolimus (91% vs 63%; P = .02) was associated with better influenza antibody response compared to those not taking mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lung transplant recipients had lower influenza vaccine response rates than healthy individuals. Influenza vaccine antibody response is influenced by concomitant administration of mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Future studies should measure protection from influenza infection conferred by immunization and alternative vaccination strategies.     

Calcineurin inhibitor substitution with sirolimus vs. reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitor plus sirolimus is associated with improved renal dysfunction in heart transplant patients

Heart transplant (HTx) patients are at risk of developing renal dysfunction. Sirolimus has been used as an alternative for calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in transplant patients with renal dysfunction. Recent data suggest that the combination of sirolimus with a CNI is associated with a deterioration of renal function in renal transplant patients. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect on the creatinine clearance (CrCl) of heart transplant (HTx) patients with renal dysfunction (RD) on CNI-based sirolimus-free regimens of conversion to either reduced-dose CNI plus sirolimus or outright substitution of CNI with sirolimus. We retrospectively identified 29 treatment switches for 26 patients with RD defined as a decline in the CrCl > 25% post-HTx. Treatment switches were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 13 switches in 13 patients (four women, nine men, age 62 +/- 10 yr) in whom sirolimus replaced CNI. Group 2 included 16 switches in 15 patients [two women, 13 men (one man underwent two such switches), age 61 +/- 9 yr] in whom CNI dose was reduced and sirolimus was added. Two men appear in both groups. Average follow-up was 10.4 +/- 3.2 months. Overall mortality, rejection, and side-effects rates were comparable between groups. At 12-months post-switch, the mean CrCl had increased from 48 +/- 15 at time of treatment switch to 56 +/- 22 mL/min in group 1 and decreased from 53 +/- 19 to 47 +/- 17 mL/min in group 2 (p = 0.02). In conclusion, substitution of CNI with sirolimus provided improved renal recovery compared with lower-dose CNI plus sirolimus in HTx patients with renal dysfunction.     

Impairment of the immune response to influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients by cyclosporine, but not azathioprine

Influenza vaccination has been strongly recommended for immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. However, immunosuppression may lead to impaired antibody responses. We studied the antibody response to an inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in 59 renal transplant recipients with life-sustaining kidney function: 21 were on cyclosporine and prednisone, 38 on azathioprine and prednisone. Healthy volunteers (n = 29) and patients on hemodialysis (n = 28) served as controls. Despite comparable renal allograft function, cyclosporine-treated patients had a significantly lower immune response against influenza A viruses than azathioprine-treated patients, whether mean antibody levels, fourfold titer rise, or seroconversion to protective titers was analyzed. No significant differences in antibody responses were found between healthy controls and patients on azathioprine. The patients on hemodialysis showed an impaired response to vaccination. However, in contrast to the cyclosporine-treated patients, booster immunization proved valuable in this group.     

Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus for Renal Transplant Recipients at High Risk for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

Sirolimus has antineoplastic effects and may reduce skin cancer rates in kidney transplant patients. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, controlled trial randomized 86 kidney transplant recipients (≥1 year posttransplant) with history of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) to continue calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) or convert to sirolimus. Patients were stratified by number of NMSC lesions (0–5, 6–20) in previous year. Primary end point was number of biopsy‐confirmed new NMSC lesions per patient‐year. Yearly NMSC rate was significantly lower with sirolimus (1.31 vs. 2.48 lesions/patient‐year; p = 0.022). Squamous cell carcinoma occurred at a lower rate in the sirolimus versus CNI group (p = 0.038); basal cell carcinoma rate was similar in both. A lower proportion of patients receiving sirolimus developed new or recurrent NMSC (56.4% vs. 80.9%; p = 0.015) or new squamous cell carcinoma (41.0% vs. 70.2%; p = 0.006). No sirolimus patients and one CNI continuation patient experienced acute rejection. Incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events was similar between groups; however, discontinuation rates related to adverse events were significantly higher with sirolimus (46.2% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). In kidney transplant recipients with history of NMSC, conversion from CNI to sirolimus reduced rates of NMSC, without increasing acute rejection risk.     

Immunogenicity and Safety of an Intradermal Boosting Strategy for Vaccination Against Influenza in Lung Transplant Recipients

The immunogenicity of influenza vaccine is suboptimal in lung transplant recipients. Use of a booster dose and vaccine delivery by the intradermal rather than intramuscular route may improve response. We prospectively evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a 2-dose boosting strategy of influenza vaccine. Sixty lung transplant recipients received a standard intramuscular injection of the 2006-2007 inactivated influenza vaccine, followed 4 weeks later by an intradermal booster of the same vaccine. Immunogenicity was assessed by measurement of geometric mean titer of antibodies after both the intramuscular injection and the intradermal booster. Vaccine response was defined as 4-fold or higher increase of antibody titers to at least one vaccine antigen. Thirty-eight out of 60 patients (63%) had a response after intramuscular vaccination. Geometric mean titers increased for all three vaccine antigens following the first dose (p < 0.001). However, no significant increases in titer were observed after the booster dose for all three antigens. Among nonresponders, 3/22 (13.6%) additional patients responded after the intradermal booster (p = 0.14). The use of basiliximab was associated with a positive response (p = 0.024). After a single standard dose of influenza vaccine, a booster dose given by intradermal injection did not significantly improve vaccine immunogenicity in lung transplant recipients.     

肝移植术后根据肝活检结果转换西罗莫司治疗:附12例报告

目的 探讨肝移植术后西罗莫司转换治疗后的有效性与安全性.方法 对12例肝移植术后完全停用钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(calcineurin Inhibitor,CNI)改用西罗莫司治疗至少1个月以上的病人进行随访,观察转换治疗后排斥反应的发生及CNI相关肾功能损害和肝功能恢复情况.结果 12例肝移植病人术后平均11个月开始西罗莫司转换治疗,治疗时间平均为14个月,平均随访时间为37个月.采用西罗莫司转换治后,12例中有6例肝穿证实未出现排斥反应.发生CNI相关肾损害的7例中有5例肾功能恢复正常,但有1例反而引起蛋白尿.反复肝功能异常的4例没有改善.结论 我们的小样本临床资料表明,对于某些经过选择的肝移植病人,例如合并CNI相关性肾损害者,可以尝试在肝穿活检指导下进行西罗莫司转换治疗.     

Influenza Vaccination in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients: Absence of Post Administration ALT Elevation

Influenza vaccination has reduced life-threatening complications from influenza virus infection in adult liver transplant recipients. We evaluated changes in aminotransferase level and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in liver transplant recipients. Fifty-one liver transplant recipients were administered a standard dose of the 2002-2003 inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine. ALT values were measured at baseline, 1 week and 4-6 weeks postvaccination. Antibody responses to each component of the vaccine were measured at baseline and after 4-6 weeks by a hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. Response was defined as an HAI titer > or = 1: 40 and/or a 4-fold increase in antibody titers from baseline. An ALT elevation was defined as a rise of > or = 50% from baseline. There was no difference in the median rise in ALT value between seroconverters and nonseroconverters. A significant number of recipients developed potentially protective antibody titers (p-value < 0.0001). At less than 4 months post transplantation, 1/7 (14%), at 4-12 months, 6/9 (67%), and after 12 months, 30/35 (86%) subjects responded to the H1 strain. Of 51 recipients, one HCV (-) recipients vaccinated within 3 months of transplantation developed acute cellular rejection. Influenza virus vaccination is not associated with allograft rejection or ALT flares in liver transplant recipients.     

Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus Conversion in Cardiac Transplant Recipients With Renal Insufficiency

This randomized, comparative, multinational phase 3b/4 study of patients 1–8 years postcardiac transplantation (mean 3.9 years) evaluated the effect of conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus on renal function in patients with renal insufficiency. In total, 116 patients on CNI therapy with GFR 40–90 mL/min/1.73m² were randomized (1:1) to sirolimus (n = 57) or CNI (n = 59). Intent‐to‐treat analysis showed the 1‐year adjusted mean change from baseline in creatinine clearance (Cockcroft‐Gault) was significantly higher with sirolimus versus CNI treatment (+3.0 vs. ?1.4 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively; p = 0.004). By on‐therapy analysis, values were +4.7 and –2.1, respectively (p < 0.001). Acute rejection (AR) rates were numerically higher in the sirolimus group; 1 AR with hemodynamic compromise occurred in each group. A significantly higher treatment discontinuation rate due to adverse events (AEs; 33.3% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) occurred in the sirolimus group. Most common treatment‐emergent AEs significantly higher in the sirolimus group were diarrhea (28.1%), rash (28.1%) and infection (47.4%). Conversion to sirolimus from CNI therapy improved renal function in cardiac transplant recipients with renal impairment, but was associated with an attendant AR risk and higher discontinuation rate attributable to AEs.     

Renal reserve test: its methodology and significance

Renal reserve (RR) is the ability of the kidneys to increase their basal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by at least 20% after a protein overload. It has been documented that RR is preserved in healthy elderly people, and even in patients with chronic kidney disease, but its magnitude is significantly decreased with aging. Besides, RR has also been evaluated in kidney transplant patients who were on sirolimus or calcineurin inhibitors (CNI):cyclosporine or tacrolimus, and it was found that RR was lower in the CNI group compared to the sirolimus group, a phenomenon that could be attributed to the intra- renal vasoconstrictive effect of CNI. In conclusion, RR is a physiological variable which has its particular characteristics in different renal settings.     

Influenza Vaccination Is Efficacious and Safe in Renal Transplant Recipients

Whether influenza vaccination in solid-organ transplant recipients is efficacious remains a controversial issue. Furthermore, theoretical concerns have been raised regarding the safety of vaccination as it might trigger rejection of the allograft. The present prospective trial is aimed at investigating the antibody response and safety of influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients (RTR).
A total of 165 RTR and 41 healthy volunteers were vaccinated with a standard trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibodies were quantified before and 1 month after vaccination. Seroprotection (SP) and seroresponse (SR) were defined as a titer ≥40 and a 4-fold rise in HI titer, respectively. Similar SR rates were observed in both groups. Postvaccination SP rates in RTR amounted to 92.7%, 78.7% and 82.9% for A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B, respectively. High baseline SP rates, most probably reflecting frequent preimmunizations, explain partly the high postvaccination SP rates. SR rate was independently and inversely associated with baseline SP rate. Mycophenolate mofetil ( MMF ) usage was associated with a 2.6–5-fold lower SR. Nonetheless, these patients showed good postvaccination SP rates. A booster dose did not enhance SP or SR rates. Influenza vaccination neither affected allograft function nor caused rejection episodes. In conclusion, influenza vaccination is efficacious and safe in renal transplantation.     

Seasonal Maintenance of Influenza Vaccine-Induced Antibody Response in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background/Aims: Although annual influenza vaccination is recommended for kidney transplant recipients, efficacy as reflected by serum antibody titers has not been well studied beyond 1 month in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study of 51 kidney transplant recipients and 102 healthy controls receiving the 2006-2007 influenza vaccine. Anti-hemagglutinin antibody titers to A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B were measured before and 1 month after vaccination, and again at the end of influenza season. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants maintaining seroprotection (antibody titer ≥1:32) for the duration of the influenza season after influenza vaccination. Results: Median follow-up time was 175 and 155 days in the transplant and control groups, respectively. For types A/H1N1 and B, a similar high proportion of the transplant and control groups (88.5 and 81.6% vs. 83.7 and 74.2% for A/H1N1 and B, respectively) maintained seroprotection. For type A/H3N2, significantly less of the transplant group (66.7%) versus the control group (90%) maintained a protective influenza vaccine response (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.64). This difference disappeared in adjusted analyses. Actual geometric mean titers decreased significantly within both groups (p < 0.001) but this did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Once they have developed protective vaccine-induced antibody responses to influenza vaccine, kidney transplant recipients are able to maintain adequate protective levels of antibody compared with healthy controls.     

Proteinuria following a switch from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus is an alternative option for kidney transplant patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) when renal function is deteriorating. However, the incidence of proteinuria following a switch from CNI to sirolimus has caused concern, and was therefore investigated here. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 68 renal transplant recipients were switched from CNI to sirolimus. Proteinuria was measured using 24-hour urine collection before the switch and collections 3, 6, 12, and 24 months thereafter. In addition, proteinuria was measured in patients who had to be switched back to CNI due to side effects. Survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Baseline proteinuria was 0.39+/-0.69 g/day in all 68 patients. It increased to a mean 1.44+/-1.90 g/day at 3 months (P<0.001) and remained elevated at 6, 12 and 24 months. When sirolimus was withdrawn after the CNI-sirolimus switch for 19 patients, proteinuria decreased from 1.95+/-2.06 g/day to 0.9+/-1.4 g/day (P<0.05). Proteinuria above 0.3 g/day before the CNI-sirolimus switch correlated significantly with the decrease of renal function thereafter. CONCLUSION: CNI-treated kidney transplant recipients may develop reversible proteinuria when switched to sirolimus.     

Tacrolimus to Belatacept Conversion Following Hand Transplantation: A Case Report

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has emerged as a viable limb replacement strategy for selected patients with upper limb amputation. However, allograft rejection has been seen in essentially all reported VCA recipients indicating a requirement for substantial immunosuppressive therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors have served as the centerpiece agent in all reported cases, and CNI‐associated complications associated with the broad therapeutic effects and side effects of calcineurin inhibitors have been similarly common. Recently, belatacept has been approved as a calcineurin inhibitor replacement in kidney transplantation, but to date, its use in VCA has not been reported. Herein, we report on the case of a hand transplant recipient who developed recurrent acute rejection with alloantibody formation and concomitant calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, all of which resolved upon conversion from a maintenance regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids to belatacept and sirolimus. This case indicates that belatacept may be a reasonable maintenance immunosuppressive alternative for use in VCA, providing sufficient prophylaxis from rejection with a reduced side effect profile, the latter being particularly relevant for nonlife threatening conditions typically treated by VCA.     

西罗莫司替代钙调磷酸酶抑制剂方案治疗肾移植后“爬行肌酐”患者的疗效观察（附28例报告）

目的探讨采用西罗莫司替代钙调磷酸酶抑制剂（CNI）方案治疗肾移植后＂爬行肌酐＂患者的临床疗效。方法具有＂爬行肌酐＂表现的28例患者中,术后采用以环孢素（CsA）为主的三联免疫抑制方案20例,采用以他克莫司（FK506）为主的三联免疫抑制方案8例。患者确诊后即停用CsA或FK506,24h后给予西罗莫司,初始剂量6mg,维持剂量为2mg/d,以后根据西罗莫司的血药浓度来调整剂量,使其血药谷浓度维持在5～9μg/L,药物替代前后麦考酚吗乙酯（MMF）及肾上腺皮质激素（激素）的用量不变。随访6个月,定期观察移植物肾功能,记录排斥反应的发生情况,并监测血常规、血糖、血脂、肝功能等指标。结果移植物肾功能明显改善16例,患者的血清肌酐（Scr）由替代前（205±20）μmo1/L降为替代后的（153±18）μmo1/L,内生肌酐清除率（Ccr）由（51±3）ml/min升高为（56±3）ml/min（均为P〈0.05）;移植物肾功能维持稳定8例,移植物肾功能继续恶化2例。治疗中,1例发生急性排斥反应,移植肾失功并恢复血液透析,1例西罗莫司替代后出现明显骨髓抑制而放弃替代治疗,恢复替代前的免疫抑制方案。结论西罗莫司替代CNI治疗肾移植后＂爬行肌酐＂患者是一种比较安全并有效的方法,可明显改善移植物肾功能,但会使患者血脂升高。     

Proteinuria Developing After Clinical Islet Transplantation Resolves with Sirolimus Withdrawal and Increased Tacrolimus Dosing

Sirolimus is a potent immunosuppressant, which may permit the avoidance of nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). However, cases of proteinuria associated with sirolimus have been reported following renal transplantation. Here, we report three cases of proteinuria (1, 2 and 7 g/day) developing during therapy with sirolimus plus low-dose tacrolimus following clinical islet transplantation (CIT) in type I diabetic subjects. The proteinuria resolved after discontinuation of sirolimus, substituted by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with an increased dose of tacrolimus. A renal biopsy in one case indicated only the presence of diabetic glomerulopathy. Five other CIT recipients developed microalbuminuria while on sirolimus which all resolved after switching to tacrolimus and MMF. The resolution of proteinuria from the native kidneys of CIT recipients after the discontinuation sirolimus suggests that, at least in some individuals, sirolimus itself may have adverse renal effects. Sirolimus should be used cautiously with close monitoring for proteinuria or renal dysfunction.     

Influenza vaccination in heart transplant recipients.

Seventy-nine heart transplant recipients were vaccinated with a trivalent influenza virus vaccine 1996/97 containing the strains A/Singapore/6/86 (H1N1), A/Wuhan/395/95 (H3N2), and B/Beijing/184/93. The proportions of patients with protective levels of antibody (HI > or = 40) after vaccination ranged from 100% (A/Singapore [H1N1]) to 31.6% (B/Beijing) and their mean fold titer increases were lower than those recorded for vaccination of 109 healthy subjects with the same batch of vaccine. The vaccinations were tolerated well and did not result in serious side effects, such as graft rejections. Our findings indicate that influenza vaccination can induce protective antibody levels in a substantial proportion of heart transplant recipients and lend support to the recommendation to vaccinate such patients annually against influenza.     

肝移植术后西罗莫司的替换治疗

目的 探讨肝移植术后应用西罗莫司的抗排斥替换治疗效果。方法 回顾性分析50例肝移植或肝肾联合移植患者替换西罗莫司前后肝肾功能的改善情况及副作用和排斥反应的发生率。34例联合应用小剂量FK506，9例联合应用骁悉，2例联合应用新山地明。5例术后远期患者，替换前仅用FK506，替换后单用西罗莫司。结果 24例患者因肝功能不良而替换西罗莫司，其中16例（66．7％）肝功能明显改善；18例患者肾功能不良，其中13例（72．2％）在2个月内肾功能明显好转；8例患者因大剂量应用FK506但其浓度未达到6ng／ml而替换西罗莫司，移植术后肝肾功能恢复良好，未出现排斥反应。本组中应用西罗莫司后出现急性排斥反应3例（6％），改用FK506后急性排斥反应治愈。11例（22％）出现白细胞及血小板减少，9例（18％）胆固醇和甘油三酯升高。这些副作用均在西罗莫司应用1月后出现，当停药或对症处理后消失。本组中未出现肝动脉血栓形成、伤口愈合不良等并发症。结论 肝移植术后应用钙调磷酸酶抑制剂发生肝肾功能不良或不能达到理想药物浓度时，西罗莫司是有效的抗排斥替代药物。     

Low Performance of Sinovac Vaccine Particularly With Belatacept Therapy in a Study With Different Types of COVID-19 Vaccines in Transplanted Patients

The huge impact of SARS-CoV-2 infections on organ transplant recipients makes it necessary to optimize vaccine efficacy in this population. To effectively implement multiple strategies, it is crucial to understand the performance of each type of available vaccine. In our study, the antibody titer was measured, and the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated after 90 days of immunization; furthermore, the differences between hybrid immunity, immunity by vaccination, and immunosuppressant type were identified. As a result, of the patients included in this study (n = 160), 53% showed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 90 days after the first dose in patients who had completed the vaccination schedule. Antibody titers were higher in patients with hybrid immunity, and the proportion of nonresponsive patients was higher among those who received the immunosuppressant belatacept in their post-transplant regimen (P = .01). Only 15% of patients treated with this medicine seroconverted and patients vaccinated with CoronaVac and treated with belatacept showed no response. In conclusion, a reduced response to vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 was identified in the transplant population, and this response varied with the type of vaccine administered and the immunosuppressive treatment.     

钙调磷酸酶抑制剂转换为西罗莫司治疗慢性移植物肾病的疗效研究

目的探讨钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)转换为西罗莫司治疗慢性移植物肾病(chronic allograft nephropathy,CAN)的疗效及不良反应。方法回顾性研究对象为2005年1月至2010年12月在西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院肾移植科随访的95例肾移植后并发CAN患者,术后均接受CNI为主的免疫抑制剂方案。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。患者确诊CAN后将CNI转换为西罗莫司。记录西罗莫司的维持剂量及血药浓度水平,了解转换治疗后血清肌酐(Scr)的变化,根据转换前Scr水平高低分为两组,Scr≥266μmol/L为Scr高水平组(22例),Scr<266μmol/L为Scr低水平组(73例);比较两组转换治疗后Scr变化幅度的差异;了解转换治疗的不良反应。结果 95例患者的随访时间6～48个月,西罗莫司的维持剂量为0.5～4mg/d(中位数为1.5mg/d),血药浓度为1.3～12ng/ml(中位数为5.4ng/ml)。Scr低水平组转换治疗效果明显高于Scr高水平组(P<0.05)。95例患者均未发生急性排斥反应。新发或蛋白尿加重32例(34%),新发或高脂血症加重25例(26%),1例患者发生肺部感染,经对症治疗后均治愈或缓解。结论 CNI类药物转换为西罗莫司治疗CAN是安全有效的,转换前Scr水平较低者的治疗效果优于转换前Scr水平较高者,转换后的主要并发症是蛋白尿和高脂血症。     

Intraoperative placing of drains decreases the incidence of lymphocele and deep vein thrombosis after renal transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of placing a prophylactic drain during renal transplantation on the incidence of lymphocele, wound complication and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in renal transplant recipients induced with sirolimus vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), as sirolimus‐based immunosuppression is a risk factor for the formation of fluid collections after transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed 165 consecutive adult renal transplant patients at our institution between January 2004 and February 2005. Group 1 (84) did not receive an intraoperative drain and group 2 (81) did. Recipients were analysed within each group based on immunosuppression (sirolimus or CNI) and whether they had wound complication, fluid collection, lymphocele treatment, or DVT.

RESULTS

In group 1 and 2, respectively, the wound complication rate was 22.6% vs 13.6% (P = 0.134), the fluid collection rate 45.2% vs 16.% (P < 0.001), the lymphocele treatment rate 19.0% vs 2.5% (P = 0.001) the DVT rate 14.3% vs 4.9% (P = 0.043) the fluid collection rate (for CNI) 26.5% vs 16.0% (P = 0.246), the lymphocele treatment rate (for CNI) 5.9% vs 0% (P = 0.084), the fluid collection rate (sirolimus) 58.0% vs 16.1% (P < 0.001) and lymphocele treatment rate (sirolimus) 28% vs 6.5% (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis of risk factors for fluid collection showed significance for no drain (odds ratio 3.30, P = 0.002), associated wound complication (2.41, P = 0.041) and sirolimus (2.48, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Placing a drain during transplantation decreased the incidence of fluid collection, lymphocele treatment and DVT. The reduction of fluid collection and lymphocele were significant for patients treated with sirolimus. We recommend placing a drain in patients undergoing induction with sirolimus‐based immunosuppression.