Relative Efficacy of Different Tilts with Biphasic Defibrillation in Humans

Objective: The goal of this study was to assess if tilt bears any impact on defibrillation efficacy of biphasic shocks. Background: Although it has been shown that hiphasic waveform may increase the defibrillation efficacy, this pulsing method has not been as extensively studied in patients, and information regarding the effect of different tilts is lacking. Methods: This study consisted of two similar but distinct protocols including 33 patients undergoing transvenous defibriilator implant. In 17 patients (Part I) defibrillation threshold was obtained delivering biphasic waveforms with 50%, 65%, and 80% tilt in random fashion. Similarly, in 16 patients (Part II) testing of biphasic waveform with 40%, 50%, and 65% tilt was performed in random order. The electrode system used consisted of two transvenous leads and a subcutaneous patch in all 33 patients. Results: In Part I, tilt of 50% demonstrated a defibrillation threshold significantly lower than 65% tilt (7.5 ± 4.3 J vs 9.7 ± 5.0 J; P = 0.04) and 80% tilt (7.5 ± 4.3) vs 11.7 ± 5.9 J; P < 0.01). Similarly, 65% tilt provided a lower defibrillation threshold than 80% tilt (9.7 ± 5.0 J vs 11.7 ± 5.9 J; P = 0.02). In Part II, no significant difference was observed in terms of defibriilation threshold between 40% tilt and the two tilts of 50% and 65%. However, as in Part I, 50% tilt provided a significant reduction of the energy to defibrillate as compared to 65% tilt (6.3 ± 3.6 J vs 9.0 ± 4.8 J; P < 0.01). The 50% tilt resulted in better defibrillation efficacy than 65% tilt independent of the lead system used for testing (Medtronic Transvene and CPI Endotak-C). Conclusions: Biphasic shocks with 50% tilt required less energy for defibrillation than 40%, 65%, and 80% tilts. However, in the clinical setting a programmable tilt may be preferable to account for some patient-to-patient variability.     

Comparison of Biphasic and Monophasic Pulses: Does the Advantage of Biphasic Shocks Depend on the Waveshape?

With present implantable defibrillators, the ability to vary the defibrillation technique has been shown to increase the number of patients suitable for transvenous system. As newer waveforms become available, the need for a flexible device may change. In addition, although it has been shown that the option of biphasic waveform may increase the defibrillation efficacy, this may depend upon the shape of the biphasic waveform used. Thirty patients undergoing transvenous defibrillator implant were included in the study. In 20 patients (group I), defibrillation efficacy of simultaneous monophasic, sequential monophasic, and biphasic waveform with 50% tilt was determined randomly. Similarly, in ten patients (group II) testing of simultaneous monophasic shocks and biphasic waveforms with 65% and 80% tilt was performed in random order. The electrode system used consisted of two transvenous leads and a subcutaneous patch in all 30 patients. In group I, 50% tilt biphasic waveform consistently provided similar or better defibrillation efficacy compared to monophasic waveforms (biphasic 7.5 ±5.1 joules vs simultaneous 17 ± 7.8 joules, P < 0.01; and vs sequential 17 ± 8.4 joules, P <0.01). In group II, 65% tilt biphasic pulse required less energy for defibrillation as compared with simultaneous monophasic shocks (9.6 ± 4.5 joulesvs 15.6 ± 5.1 joules, P = 0.04). No significant difference was observed in terms of defibrillation threshold between 80% tilt biphasic shocks and simultaneous monophasic pulses (11.8 ± 6 joules vs 15.6 ±5.1 joules, P = NS). Biphasic shocks with smaller tilt delivered using a triple lead system more uniformly improved defibrillation threshold over standard monophasic waveforms.     

Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans

It is unknown if there is a single optimal biphasic waveform for defibrillation. Biphasic waveform tilt may be an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy. The purpose of this study was to compare acute defibrillation success with a three-electrode configuration in humans using 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt truncated exponential, biphasic waveforms delivered through a 110-microF capacitor. Acute DFTs for biphasic waveforms with 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt were measured in random order in 60 patients using a binary search method. The electrode configuration consisted of a RV coil as the cathode, and a SVC coil plus a pectoral active can emulator (CAN) as the anode. The waveforms were derived from an external voltage source with 110-microF capacitance, and the leading edge voltage of phase 2 was equal to the trailing edge voltage of phase 1. Stored energy DFT (9.2 +/- 5.7 [50%/50%] vs 10.8 +/- 6.4 [65%/65%] J, P = 0.007), current DFT (10.9 +/- 4.0 [50%/50%] vs 12.0 +/- 4.4 [65%/65%] A, P = 0.002) and voltage DFT (391 +/- 118 [50%/50%] vs 424 +/- 128 [65%/65%] V, P = 0.004) were significantly lower for the 50%/50% tilt waveform versus the 65%/65% tilt waveform using this three-electrode configuration and a 110-microF capacitor. For an RV(-)/SVC plus CAN(+) electrode configuration and a 110-microF capacitor, a 50%/50% tilt biphasic waveform results in a 15% reduction in energy DFT, 9% reduction in current DFT, and 8% reduction in voltage DFT versus a 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform.     

"Tuned" Defibrillation Waveforms Outperform 50/50% Tilt Defibrillation Waveforms: A Randomized Multi-Center Study

Introduction: A superior performance of a tuned waveform based on duration using an assumed cardiac membrane time constant of 3.5 ms and of a 50/50% tilt waveform over a standard 65/65% tilt waveform has been documented before. However, there has been no direct comparison of the tuned versus the 50/50% tilt waveforms.
Methods: In 34 patients, defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) for tuned versus 50/50% tilt waveforms in a random order were measured by using the optimized binary search method. High voltage lead impedance was measured and used to select the pulse widths for tuned and 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms.
Results: Delivered energy (7.3 ± 4.6 J vs 8.7 ± 5.3 J, P = 0.01), stored energy (8.2 ± 5.1 J vs 9.7 ± 5.6 J, P = 0.01), and delivered voltage (405.9 ± 121.7 V vs 445.0 ± 122.6 V, P = 0.008) were significantly lower for the tuned than for the 50/50% tilt waveform. In four patients with DFT ≥15 J, the tuned waveform lowered the mean energy DFT by 2.8 J and mean voltage DFT by 45 V. For all patients, the mean peak delivered energy DFT was reduced from 29 J to 22 J (24% decrease). Multiple regression analysis showed that a left ventricular ejection fraction <20% is a significant predictor of this advantage.
Conclusion: Energy and voltage DFTs are lowered with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator that uses a tuned waveform compared to a standard 50% tilt biphasic waveform.     

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Biphasic Waveform Tilt Using a Unipolar Defibrillation System

Background: A unipolar defihrillation system using a single right ventricular (RV) electrode and the active shell or container of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator situated in a left infraclavicular pocket has been shown to be as efficient in defibrillation as an epicardial lead system. Additional improvements in this system would have favorable practice implications and could derive from alterations in pulse waveform shape. The specific purpose of this study is to determine whether defibrillation efficacy can be improved further in humans by lowering biphasic waveform tilt. Methods: We prospectively and randomly compared the defibrillation efficacy of a 50% and a 65% tilt asymmetric biphasic waveform using the unipolar defibrillation system in 15 consecutive cardiac arrest survivors prior to implantation of a presently available standard transvenous defibrillation system. The RV defibrillation electrode has a 5-cm coil located on a 10.5 French lead and was used as the anode. The system cathode was the active 108 cm² surface area shell (or “CAN”) of a prototype titanium alloy pulse generator placed in the left infraclavicular pocket. The defibrillation pulse derived from a 120-μF capacitor and was delivered from RV ± CAN, with RV positive with respect to the CAN during the initial portion of the cycle. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) stored energy, delivered energy, leading edge voltage and current, pulse resistance, and pulse width were measured for both tilts examined. Results: The unipolar single lead system, RV ± CAN, using a 65% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.7 ± 5.7 J and a delivered energy DFT of 7.6 ± 5.0 J. In ail 15 patients, stored and delivered energy DFTs were < 20 J. The 50% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.2 ± 5.4 J and a delivered energy DFT of 6.1 ± 4.0 J;P = 0.69 and 0.17, respectively. As with the 65% tilt pulse, all 15 patients had stored and delivered energy DFTs < 20 J. Conclusion: The unipolar single lead transvenous defibrillation system provides defibrillation at energy levels comparable to that reported with epicardial lead systems. This system is not improved by use of a 50% tilt biphasic waveform instead of a standard 65% tilt biphasic pulse. (PACE 1995; 18:1369–1373)     

Biphasic Defibrillation Using a Single Capacitor with Large Capacitance: Reduction of Peak Voltages and ICD Device Size

The volume of current implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) is not convenient for pectoral implantation. One way to reduce the size of the pulse generator is to find a more effective defibrillation pulse waveform generated from smaller volume capacitors. In a prospective randomized crossover study we compared the step-down defibrillation threshold (DFT) of a standard biphasic waveform (STD), delivered by two 250-μF capacitors connected in series with an 80% tilt, to an experimental biphasic waveform delivered by a single 450μF capacitor with a 60% tilt. The experimental waveform delivered the same energy with a lower peak voltage and a longer duration (LVLDj. Intraopera-tively, in 25 patients receiving endocardial (n = 12) or endocardial-subcutaneous array (n = 13) defibrillation leads, the DFT was determined for both waveforms. Energy requirements did not differ at DFT for the STD and LVLD waveforms with the low impedance (32 ± 4Ω) endocardial-subcutaneous array defibrillation lead system (6.4 ± 4.4 J and 5.9 ± 4.2 J, respectively) or increased slightly (P - 0.06) with the higher impedance (42 ± 4 Ω) endocardial lead system (10.4 ± 4.6 J and 12.7 ± 5.7 /. respectively), However, the voltage needed at DFT was one-third lower with the LVLD waveform than with the STD waveform for both lead systems (256 ± 85 V vs 154 ± 53 V and 348 ± 76 V vs 232 ± 54 V, respectively). Thus, a single capacitor with a large capacitance can generate a defibrillation pulse with a substantial lower peak voltage requirement without significantly increasing the energy requirements. The volume reduction in using a single capacitor can decrease ICD device size.     

Effect of Increased Parasympathetic and Sympathetic Tone on Internal Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds in Humans

Although changes in autonomic tone affect ventricular defibrillation, little is known about the effect of increased parasympathetic or sympathetic tone on the atrial defbrillation threshold. Methods: To evaluate the effect of reflexly increased parasympathetic and increase α- and β-adrenergic tone on the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT), atrial fibrillation was induced in 14 patients. ADFTs, right atrial refractory period (RARP), and monophasic action potential duration (MAPD) were determined before and after autonomic intervention. ADFTs were determined with a step-up protocol using 3/3-ms biphasic shocks delivered through decapolar catheters in the right atrial appendage and coronary sinus. Two groups were studied. Group I (N = 8) had ADFTs determined at baseline, after receiving phenylephrine (PE), and with PE plus atropine (A). Group 2 (N = 6) had ADFTs determined at baseline and after receiving isoproterenol (ISO). Results: Group I: PE significantly increased sinus cycle length (SR-CL) compared to baseline (742 ± 123 to 922 ± 233 ms) without significantly changing RARP, MAPD, or ADFT (2.3 ± 1.3 J vs 2.3 ± 0.8 J). With PE + A, SR-CL significantly decreased (529 ± 100 ms vs 742 ± 123 ms) and MAPD shortened (231 ± 41 ms vs 279 ± 49 ms) without altering RARP or ADFT (1.94 ± 0.9 J vs 2.25 ± 1.25 J). Group 2: ISO decreased SR-CL (486 ± 77 ms vs 755 ± 184 ms) and MAPD (169 ± 37 ms vs 226 + 58 ms) but not RARP or ADFT (2.25 ± 1.21 J vs 2.33 ± 1.75 J). Conclusions: Increasing parasympathetic, α-, or β-adrenergic tone does not affect the ADFT despite causing significant electrophysiological changes in the atria.     

Effects of Polarity for Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks on Defibrillation Efficacy with an Endocardial System

Electrode polarity has been reported to be one of the factors that affect defibrillation efficacy. We studied the influence of polarity on defibrillation efficacy when monophasic and biphosic waveforms were used with an endocardial lead system. In six anesthetized pigs, defibrillation catheters were placed in the right ventricular (RV) apex and at the junction of the superior vena cava (SVC) and right atrium. Monophasic shocks were 6 ms in duration, while for biphasic shocks the first phase was 6 ms and the second was 4 ms in duration. Four electrode configurations were tested: R:S, M (the RV electrode, cathode; the SVC electrode, anode, with a monophasic shock); S:R. M; R:S, B (the RV electrode, first phase cathode; the SVC electrode, first phase anode, with a biphasic shock); S:R, B. Defibrillation probability of success curves were determined using an up/down protocol requiring 15 shocks for each configuration. For monophasic shocks, total delivered energy at the 50% probability of success point was significantly lower when the RV electrode was an anode than when it was a cathode (R:S, M: 24.4 ± 7.4 J [mean ± SD] vs S:R, M: 16.4 ± 5.5 J; P < 0.05). For biphasic shocks, total energy was not affected by polarity reversal of the electrodes (R:S, B: 8.7 ± 1.4 J vs S:R, B: 8.4 ± 2.5 J; P = NS). The endocardial electrode configuration with the RV electrode as an anode requires less energy for defibrillation with a monophasic but not a biphasic waveform.     

Open-chest epicardial "surgical" defibrillation: biphasic versus monophasic waveform shocks

The aim of the study was to compare biphasic versus monophasic shocks for open-chest epicardial defibrillation. Transthoracic biphasic waveform shocks require less energy to terminate ventricular fibrillation compared to monophasic waveform shocks. However, if biphasic shocks are effective for open-chest epicardial ("surgical") defibrillation has not been established. Twenty-eight anesthetized adult swine (15-25 kg) underwent a midline sternotomy. Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced. After 15 seconds of ventricular fibrillation, each pig in group 1 (n = 16) randomly received damped sinusoidal monophasic epicardial shocks and truncated exponential biphasic epicardial shocks from large (44.2 cm2) paddle electrodes at eight energy levels (2-50 J). Pigs in group 2 (n = 12) received monophasic and truncated exponential biphasic shocks from small (15.9 cm2) paddle electrodes. In group 1 (large paddle electrodes), the overall percent shock success rose from 15 +/- 9% at 2 J to 97 +/- 3% at 50 J. In this group there was no significant difference in percent of shock success between damped sinusoidal monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks. In group 2 (small paddle electrodes), biphasic shocks yielded a significantly higher percent of shock success than monophasic shocks at mid-energy levels from 7 to 20 J (all P < 0.01). With small surgical paddle electrodes, biphasic waveform shocks demonstrated a significantly higher percent of shock success rate compared to monophasic waveform shocks. With large paddle electrodes, the two waveforms were equally effective.     

External exponential biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform: efficacy in ventricular fibrillation of longer duration

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) duration may be a factor in determining the defibrillation energy for successful defibrillation. Exponential biphasic waveforms have been shown to defibrillate with less energy than do monophasic waveforms when used for external defibrillation. However, it is unknown whether this advantage persists with longer VF duration. We tested the hypothesis that exponential biphasic waveforms have lower defibrillation energy as compared to exponential monophasic waveforms even with longer VF duration up to 1 minute. In a swine model of external defibrillation (n = 12, 35 +/- 6 kg), we determined the stored energy at 50% defibrillation success (E50) after both 10 seconds and 1 minute of VF duration. A single exponential monophasic (M) and two exponential biphasic (B1 and B2) waveforms were tested with the following characteristics: M (60 microF, 70% tilt), B1 (60/60 microF, 70% tilt/3 ms pulse width), and B2 (60/20 microF, 70% tilt/3 ms pulse width) where the ratio of the phase 2 leading edge voltage to that of phase 1 was 0.5 for B1 and 1.0 for B2. E50 was measured by a Bayesian technique with a total often defibrillation shocks in each waveform and VF duration randomly. The E50 (J) for M, B1, and B2 were 131 +/- 41, 57 +/- 18,* and 60 +/- 26* with 10 seconds of VF duration, respectively, and 114 +/- 62, 77 +/- 45,* and 72 +/- 53* with 1 minute of VF duration, respectively (*P < 0.05 vs M). There was no significant difference in the E50 between 10 seconds and 1 minute of VF durations for each waveform. We conclude that (1) the E50 does not significantly increase with lengthening VF durations up to 1 minute regardless of the shock waveform, and (2) external exponential biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic waveforms even with longer VF durations.     

Internal Ventricular Defibrillation with Sequential Pulse Countershock in Pigs: Comparison with Single Pulses and Effects of Pulse Separation

We compared single to sequential pulse shocks with different pulse separations on internal cardiac defibrillation by using a catheter and plaque electrodes in open-chest halothane-anesthetized pigs. Ten seconds after fibrillation onset, defibrillation was attempted using trapezoidal pulses of 65% tilt, approximately 5 ms duration and fixed outputs from 1.0 to 50 joules (J). With single pulses, minimum defibrillation energy for the catheter alone was 2.4 ± 0.3 J/kg (mean ± standard error) and 2.1 ± 0.2 J/kg for the catheter tip to plaque configuration. With sequential pulse shocks, the first pulse delivered via the catheter and the second pulse from the catheter tip to the plaque electrode, the energy necessary for defibrillation was dependent on the separation time between the two pulses (2.0 ± 0.2, 1.5 ± 0.2, 0.9 ± 0.1, 1.3 ± 0.3, 0.6 ± 0.2, and 1.2 ± 0.2 J/kg at 100, 10, 1, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.1 ms, respectively). Further, at the 0.2 ms separation, 100% of the animals could be defibrillated with less than 2.0 J/kg (35 J total). We conclude that sequential pulse defibrillation provides a significant improvement over single pulse defibrillation. The optimum separation between the sequential pulses in this study was 0.2 ms.     

Waveform Optimization for Internal Atrial Defibrillation: Effects of Waveform Rounding, Phase Duration, and Voltage Swing

KIDWAI, B.J., et al. : Waveform Optimization for Internal Atrial Defibrillation: Effects of Waveform Rounding, Phase Duration, and Voltage Swing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of internal atrial defibrillation by conventional truncated exponential biphasic waveforms with and without waveform rounding (1–2 phases) and to determine optimal duration for this novel double rounded waveform. Atrial fibrillation, induced by rapid electrical stimulation, was converted by internal shocks through defibrillation catheters (lateral right atrium and coronary sinus) in anesthetised sheep. Rounding the leading edges of the conventional biphasic waveform (Ventritex HVS‐02; settings 100/–50 V, 150/–70 V , and 200/–100 V; n = 8 ) reduced delivered peak and trough voltages, currents, and energy (by ≥ 21%, P < 0.001 ; for double (both phases) rounded) without decreasing cardioversion success. At 100/–50 V the efficacy of single (first phase) rounded (53 ± 13%; mean ± SEM ) and double rounded (59 ± 11% ) shocks was similar to the conventional waveform (56 ± 14% ). Double rounded waveform (phase durations 1–20 ms) efficacy was optimum at 6–10 ms phase duration (100% success at 10–ms phase duration; 1.52 ± 0.04 J delivered energy; n = 6 ). Successful cardioversion by conventional, single rounded, and double rounded biphasic waveforms (duration 6 ms each phase), conventional monophasic, rounded monophasic (duration 12 ms), and a damped sine waveform correlated strongly with peak‐to‐trough voltage swing within the waveform (r = 0.882; P < 0.01; n = 8 ). For internal atrial defibrillation, rounding both phases of the conventional biphasic waveforms, the double rounded waveform, permits similar efficacy to the conventional truncated exponential biphasic waveform at reduced peak voltage, current, and delivered energy. Optimum phase duration is 6–10 ms (tested range 1–20 ms).     

A Comparison of Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation of Acute and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation and the Effect of Intravenous Sotalol on Human Atrial Defibrillation Threshold

The comparative efficacy and safety of transvenous defibrillation for acute and chronic AF and the effect of antiarrhythmic agents on this therapy have not been evaluated. Transvenous atrial defibrillation was performed in 25 patients with chronic AF and 13 patients with acute AF by delivering R wave synchronized, biphasic shocks between the right atrium and coronary sinus. The lowest energy and voltage resulting in successful defibrillation were considered to be atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT). Intravenous sotalol (1.5 mg/kg) was thengiven over 15 minutes and ADFT was determined again. The mean ADFT was 1.5 /and 3.6 J for acute and chronic AF, respectively, and the threshold was highly reproducible. Sotaloi reduced ADFT in patients with acute AF while the reduction in chronic AF group was not significant. There was no significant increase in creatinine kinase nor reduction in blood pressure, but prolonged pause after successful defibrillation required ventricular supporting pacing. We conclude that transvenous atrial defibrillation is a safe and effective means for defibrillating both acute and chronic AF. ADFT was lower in acute AF than in chronic AF. ADFT was highly reproducible during repeated defibrillation. Sotalol reduced ADFT in acute AF and to a lesser extent in chronic AF, and increased the defibrillation success rate. Ventricular pacing will often be required because of prolonged pause after successful defibrillation.     

Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Biphasic waveforms are routinely used for implantable defibrillators. These waveforms have been less readily adopted for external defibrillation. This study was performed in order to evaluate the efficacy and harms of biphasic waveforms over monophasic waveforms for the transthoracic defibrillation of patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF) or haemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia. METHODS: Studies included randomised controlled trials comparing monophasic and biphasic external defibrillation for participants with VF or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia. Seven trials (1129 patients) were included in the analysis. All trials were conducted during electrophysiology procedures or implantable cardioverter/defibrillator testing. RESULTS: Compared with 200 J monophasic shocks, 200 J biphasic shocks reduced the risk of post-first shock asystole or persistent VF by 81% (relative risk (RR) 0.19; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.06-0.60) for the first shock. Reducing the energy of the biphasic waveform to 115-130 J resulted in similar effectiveness compared with the monophasic waveform at 200 J (RR 1.07, CI 0.66-1.74). Low energy biphasic shocks produce less myocardial injury than higher energy monophasic shocks as determined by ST segment deflection after shock. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic waveforms defibrillate with similar efficacy at lower energies than standard 200 J monophasic waveforms, and greater efficacy than monophasic shocks of the same energy. Available data suggests that lower delivered energy and voltage result in less post-shock myocardial injury.     

Efficacy of Biphasic Shock for Transthoracic Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation:

Although electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently performed, initial energy requirements for cardioversion of persistent AF is still a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of persistent AF and to predict adequate initial energy. A prospective study enrolled 94 consecutive patients with persistent AF, who were referred for elective cardioversion with a biphasic waveform. The paddles were placed in the anterolateral position. A step-up protocol was used to estimate the cardioversion threshold. The initial shock energy was 50 J, with subsequent increments to 100, 200, and 300 J in the event of cardioversion failure. The mean age of the study group was of about 65 years (6 ± 11 years) and a median duration of AF was 65 days (3–324). Sixty-two out of 94 patients were men, 55% of the study population was classified as having well-controlled hypertension. The overall success rate of cardioversion was 89%, with a mean 2.2 ± 1.4 shocks, and effective J 217.8 ± 113 delivered during repeated cardioversions. The success rate of low energy shocks: 50 and 50 +100 J was 51%. By logistic regression analysis the only independent predictor of success at low energy shock was shorter duration of AF (r =−0.51; P = 0.02). Patients with shorter duration of AF have a higher probability for successful cardioversion with low energy. In patients with longer AF duration, a 200 J shock should be considered for cardioversion as the initial energy. (PACE 2004; 27[Pt. I]:764–768)     

Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance

BACKGROUND: We have demonstrated previously that triphasic waveform shocks were superior to biphasic waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of quadriphasic versus triphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation in a porcine model. METHODS: Sixteen adult swine (19-25 kg, mean: 21.5 kg) were deeply anesthetized and intubated. To simulate impedance of the human chest, fixed electrical resistors (25 or 50 ohms) was placed in series with the defibrillator and the chest of each pig. After 30 s of electrically induced VF, each pig received transthoracic shocks, using either a truncated exponential triphasic waveform (5 ms positive pulse duration, 5 ms negative pulse duration and 5 ms positive pulse duration, total waveform duration 15 ms) or a quadriphasic waveform (5/5/5/5 ms, total waveform duration 20 ms). Each pig received transthoracic triphasic and quadriphasic shocks at three selected energy levels (50, 100 and 150 J) in random sequence. Four shocks were delivered at each energy level to construct an energy versus % success curve. Success was defined as VF termination at 5 s after shock. The total shocks were divided into three groups based on the delivered energy actually delivered to the animal: <40, 40-65 and >65 J. Delivered energy = (animal impedance/total impedance) times selected energy of the shock. RESULTS: For high-impedance animals (86-102 ohms), quadriphasic waveform shocks achieved significantly higher percent shock success than triphasic shocks for the termination of VF at the energy levels of >65 J actually delivered (quadriphasic 72.7+/-12.2%, triphasic 38.9+/-7.7%, p<0.02). No differences in the shock success between quadriphasic and triphasic waveforms were found for other two energy levels. There were no differences in ventricular tachycardia or asystole after shocks between quadriphasic and triphasic waveforms. CONCLUSION: In this porcine model, 20 ms (5/5/5/5) quadriphasic shocks were superior to 15 ms (5/5/5) triphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation in animals with impedances that simulated high impedance in humans.     

Woven Wire Patches Are Superior to Solid Disks for Subcutaneous Electrodes: Implications for Active Can Defibrillation

The housing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is being considered for a remote electrode to replace the conventional subcutaneous woven wire patch. It is not clear that the solid smooth and rigid metal surface of the ICD housing will provide the same performance as does the woven wire patch. We compared a solid titanium disk to a titanium woven wire patch for defibrillation performance in a canine model. The patch had a smaller outline area, a slightly smaller conductive perimeter, and slightly less of a small feature surface area than did the disk. The remote electrode (disk or patch) was inserted at the point of maximal apical cardiac impulse. A commercially available endocardial electrode was placed in the right ventricle (RV). Conventional biphasic shocks (140-μFrench capacitor and 65% tilt) were delivered between the RV and subcutaneous electrode. The patch had significantly lower resistances than did the disk (81.6 ± 8.0 Ω vs 90.0 ± 11.6 Ω P < 0.006). The patch also had significantly lower stored energy defibrillation thresholds than did the disk (8.0 ± 2.6 J vs 9.3 ± 3.3 J, P < 0.007). In spite of smaller values for every geometrical dimension, the woven wire patch out performed the solid disk for defibrillation with conventional biphasic waveforms. Since the ICD housingis typically smooth titanium, the use of waveforms better suited for the active can configuration may deserve a systematic evaluation.     

Short Biphasic Pulses from 90 Microfarad Capacitors Lower Defibrillation Threshold

For defibrillation between right ventricular and retropectoral patch electrodes using truncated exponential pulses, the stored energy defibrillation threshold (DFT) is lower for short pulses from small 60-μF capacitors than for conventional pulses from 120-μF capacitors, but 60-μF pulses frequently require higher voltages than are currently used. The goal of this study was to determine if DFT could be reduced by intermediate size 90-μF capacitors. This study compared biphasic waveform DFTs for 120μF-65% tilt pulses, 90μF-65% tilt pulses, and 90 μF-50% tilt pulses in 20 patients at defibrillator implantation. The 90μF-50% tilt pulses were selected because their duration is half that of 120μF-65% tilt pulses. The stored energy DFT for 90 μF-50% tilt pulses (9.1 ± 4.3 J) was less than both the DFT for 120 μF-65% tilt pulses (12.0 ± 5.5 J, P < 0.005) and the DFT for 90μF-65% tilt pulses (11.6 ± 5.8 J, P < 0.005). There was no significant difference between the latter two values. The voltage DFTs for 90 μF-50% pulses (436 ± 113 V) and 120 μF-65% tilt pulses (436 ± 104 V) were not statistically different; the voltage DFT for 90 μF-65% tilt pulses was higher than for either of the other two pulses (490 ± 131, P < 0.005). The DFT was 20 } or greater in three patients for both 120 μF-65% tilt pulses and 90 μF-65% tilt pulses, but it was 16 J or less in all patients for 90 μF-50% tilt pulses. When pathways were dichotomized by the median resistance of 71 Ω, 90 μF-50% tilt pulses significantly reduced DFTs compared to 120 μF-65% tilt pulses for higher resistance pathways (9.2 ± 4.0 J vs 13.0 ± 6.2 J, P = 0.002), but not lower resistance pathways (9.0 ± 4.8 J vs 10.9 ± 4.6 J, P = NS). For the electrode configuration tested, biphasic 90 μF-50% tilt pulses reduce stored energy DFT in comparison with 120 μF-65% tilt pulses without increasing voltage DFT. However, 90 μF-65% tilt pulses provide no benefit.     

Large Capacitor Defibrillation Waveform Reduces Peak Voltages Without Increasing Energies

This study tested the hypothesis that increasing capacitance would allow a reduction in ICD size without reducing the deliverable energy. For example, the volume of a single 450 μF capacitor (390 V peak) is 1/3 less than that of two 250 μF capacitors (780 V), but it can store equivalent amounts of energy.Methods: Endocardial defibrillation electrodes (3.4 cm) were positioned in the RV apex and at the RA/ SVC junction in six mixed-breed, isoflurane anesthetized pigs (41 ± 3 kg). Three 17-cm ribbon wires were positioned subcutaneously on the left lateral chest (SQArray). Two CPI VENTAK ECDs were equipped to deliver 60/40 biphasic waveforms using either 125 μF (STD) or 500 μF (LD) of capacitance. A 15 shock up/down protocol was used to determine the 50% probability of success levels for each waveform in each animal. Shocks were delivered from RV(-)→SVC + SQArray(+) in random order. Results were compared using paired Student'sf-tests and are reported as mean ± SE. Results: The 500 μF long duration waveform reduced peak voltage 41% (374 ± 18 V [STD] vs 219 ± 14 V (LD], P < 0.001) and reduced peak current 38% (11.0 ± 1.1 A [STD] vs 6.8 ± 0.6 A [LD], P < 0.001) but did not significantly change the delivered energy(12.4 ± 1.3 J [STD] vs 13.4 ± 1.0 J [LD]). Durations increased from 10.0 ± 0.2 to 17.6 ± 0.5 msec (P < 0.001).Conclusions: Defibrillation with a 500 μF, long duration biphasic defibrillation waveform received similar amounts of energy but significantly reduced peak voltage and current compared to a waveform produced from 125 μF. A single large capacitor could be used to reduce the physical size of an ICD compared to the standard two capacitor system.     

A pilot study of a low-tilt biphasic waveform for transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: improved efficacy compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in patients

Background: The optimal waveform tilt for defibrillation is not known. Most modern defibrillators used for the cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) employ high-tilt, capacitor-based biphasic waveforms.
Methods: We have developed a low-tilt biphasic waveform for defibrillation. This low-tilt waveform was compared with a conventional waveform of equivalent duration and voltage in patients with AF. Patients with persistent AF or AF induced during a routine electrophysiology study (EPS) were randomized to receive either the low-tilt waveform or a conventional waveform. Defibrillation electrodes were positioned in the right atrial appendage and distal coronary sinus. Phase 1 peak voltage was increased in a stepwise progression from 50 V to 300V. Shock success was defined as return of sinus rhythm for ≥30 seconds.
Results: The low-tilt waveform produced successful termination of persistent AF at a mean voltage of 223 V (8.2 J) versus 270 V (6.7 J) with the conventional waveform (P = 0.002 for voltage, P = ns for energy). In patients with induced AF the mean voltage for the low-tilt waveform was 91V (1.6 J) and for the conventional waveform was 158 V (2.0 J) (P = 0.005 for voltage, P = ns for energy). The waveform was much more successful at very low voltages (less than or equal to 100 V) compared with the conventional waveform (Novel: 82% vs Conventional 22%, P = 0.008).
Conclusion: The low-tilt biphasic waveform was more successful for the internal cardioversion of both persistent and induced AF in patients (in terms of leading edge voltage).