Intraaortic balloon pump therapy facilitates posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

Background. Displacement of the heart to expose posterior vessels during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG, or OPCAB) may impair cardiac function. We used the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) preoperatively to reduce operative risk and to facilitate posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients with left main coronary artery disease (> 75% stenosis), intractable resting angina, postinfarction angina, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 35%), or unstable angina.

Methods. One hundred and forty-two consecutive patients who underwent multivessel OPCAB including posterior vessel revascularization were studied prospectively. The patients were divided into group I (n = 57), which received preoperative or intraoperative IABP, and group II (n = 85), which did not receive IABP. In group I, there were 34 patients with left main coronary artery disease, 24 patients with intractable resting angina, 8 patients with left ventricular dysfunction, 5 patients with postinfarction angina, and 40 patients with unstable angina. Seven patients received intraoperative IABP support owing to hemodynamic instability during OPCAB.

Results. There was no operative mortality in group I and 1 death in group II. The average number of distal anastomoses was not different between group I and group II (3.4 ± 0.9 versus 3.5 ± 0.9, p = not significant). There were no significant differences in the number of posterior vessel anastomoses per patient. There were no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit, hospital stay, and morbidity between the two groups. There was one IABP-related complication in group I.

Conclusions. IABP therapy facilitates posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients, and surgical results are comparable with those in lower-risk patients.     

A prospective randomized study to evaluate splanchnic hypoxia during beating-heart and conventional coronary revascularization

Objective: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with gut mucosal hypoxia, which may contribute to gastrointestinal complications. We examined gastric mucosal oxygenation together with whole-body oxygen flux in low-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with and without CPB. Methods: Fifty-four patients undergoing primary CABG by the same surgeon were randomized into either on-pump (ONCAB, n=27) or off-pump (OPCAB, n=27) groups. The ONCAB group underwent mild hypothermic (35°C) pulsatile CPB with arterial line filtration. Each patient underwent perioperative monitoring with continuous tonometry and cardiac output devices. Gastric intramucosal pH (pHi), gastric-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (CO₂ gap), whole-body oxygen delivery (DO₂) and consumption (VO₂) and whole-body oxygen extraction fraction were measured at sequential time-points intraoperatively and up to 6 h postoperatively. Anaesthetic management was standardized. Results: Both groups had similar demographic makeup and extent of revascularization (ONCAB 2.6±0.9 grafts versus OPCAB 2.5±0.8 grafts; P=0.55). The ONCAB group had a mean (±SD) CPB time of 62±25 min and aortic cross-clamp time of 32±11 min. In both groups there was a similar and progressive drop in pHi intraoperatively. Postoperatively, there was a gradual separation between the groups with ONCAB patients showing no further decline in pHi, while further deterioration was observed in the OPCAB group up to 6 h postoperatively. There was a significant difference between the groups over time (P=0.03). There was a corresponding progressive rise in CO₂ gap perioperatively in both groups, with ONCAB patients demonstrating superior preservation of gastric mucosal oxygenation in the early postoperative period. Global oxygen utilization measurements showed superior DO₂ and VO₂ in the OPCAB group throughout the study. Conclusions: Despite superior global oxygen flux associated with beating-heart revascularization, gastric mucosal hypoxia occurred to similar extents in both groups with worsening trends for the OPCAB patients postoperatively. The splanchnic pathophysiology during beating-heart revascularization should be further explored.     

Inflammatory response and myocardial injury following coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass

Objective: In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) the inflammatory response is suggested to be minimized. Coronary anastomoses are performed during temporary coronary occlusion. Inflammatory response and myocardial ischaemia need to be studied in a randomized study comparing CABG in multivessel disease with versus without CPB. Methods: Following randomization 30 consecutive patients received CABG either with (n=16) or without CPB (n=14). Primary study endpoints were parameters of the inflammatory response (interleukin (IL)-6, interleukin-10, ICAM-1, P-selectin) and of myocardial injury (myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), troponin I) (intraoperatively, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h after surgery). The secondary endpoint was clinical outcome. Results: The incidence of major (death: CABG with CPB n=1, not significant (n.s.)) and minor adverse events (wound infection: with CPB n=2, without CPB n=1, n.s.; atrial fibrillation: with CPB n=3, without CPB n=2, n.s.) was comparable between both groups. The release of IL-6 was comparable during 8 h of observation (n.s.). Immediately postoperatively IL-10 levels were higher in the operated group with CPB (211.7±181.9 ng/ml) than in operated patients without CPB (104.6±40.3 ng/ml, P=0.0017). Thereafter no differences were found between both groups. A similar pattern of release was observed in serial measures of ICAM-1 and P-selectin, with no difference between both study groups (n.s.). Eight hours postoperatively the cumulative release of myoglobin was lower in operated patients without CPB (1829.7±1374.5 μg/l) than in operated patients with CPB (4469.8±4525.7 μg/l, P=0.0152). Troponin I release was 300.7±470.5 μg/l (48 h postoperatively) in patients without CPB and 552.9±527.8 μg/l (P=0.0213). CK-MB mass release was 323.5±221.2 μg/l (24 h postoperatively) in operated patients without CPB and 1030.4±1410.3 μg/l in operated patients with CPB (P=0.0003). Conclusions: This prospective randomized study suggests that in low-risk patients the impact of surgical access on inflammatory response may mimic the influence of long cross-clamp and perfusion times on inflammatory response. Our findings indicate that multiregional warm ischaemia, caused by snaring of the diseased coronary artery, causes considerably less myocardial injury than global cold ischaemia induced by cardioplegic cardiac arrest.     

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although there has been some evidence supporting the theoretical and practical advantages of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) over the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), it has not yet been determined which group of patients would benefit most from it. It has been advocated recently that high-risk patients could benefit most from avoidance of CPB. The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the efficacy of the OPCAB technique in multi-vessel myocardial revascularization in a large series of high-risk patients. METHODS: The records of 1398 consecutive high-risk patients who underwent primary isolated CABG at Harefield Hospital between August 1996 and December 2001 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were considered as high-risk and included in the study if they had a preoperative EuroSCORE of > or =5. Two hundred and eighty-six patients were operated on using the OPCAB technique while 1112 patients were operated on using the conventional CABG technique with CPB. The OPCAB patients were significantly older than the CPB patients (68.1+/-8.3 vs. 63.7+/-9.9 years, respectively, P<0.001). The OPCAB group included significantly more patients with poor left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction (EF) < or =30%) (P<0.001) and more patients with renal problems (P<0.001). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of grafts between the groups. The CPB patients received 2.8+/-1.2 grafts per patient while OPCAB patients received 2.8+/-0.5 grafts per patient (P=1). Twenty-one (7.3%) OPCAB patients had one or more major complications, while 158 (14.2%) CPB patients (P=0.008) developed major complications. Thirty-eight (3.4%) CPB patients developed peri-operative myocardial infarction (MI) while only two (0.7%) OPCAB patients developed peri-operative MI (P=0.024). The intensive therapy unit (ITU) stay for OPCAB patients was 29.3+/-15.4 h while for CPB patients it was 63.6+/-167.1 h (P<0.001). There were ten (3.5%) deaths in the OPCAB patients compared to 78 (7%) deaths in the CPB patients (P=0.041) within 30 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that using the OPCAB technique for multi-vessel myocardial revascularization in high-risk patients significantly reduces the incidence of peri-operative MI and other major complications, ITU stay and mortality. Even though the OPCAB group included a significantly higher proportion of older patients with poor LV function (EF < or =30%) and renal problems, the beneficial effect of OPCAB was evident.     

The warm versus cold perfusion controversy: a clinical comparative study

To evaluate the effects of temperature on myocardial and total body protection, we analyzed 129 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement, or both, with continuous cardioplegia (Cp). The patients were assigned to three groups: group I (n = 37) normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (37°C) and warm (37°C) Cp, group II (n = 49) normothermic CPB and cold (4°C) Cp and group III (n = 43) hypothermic (28°C) CPB and cold Cp. Comparison of groups I and II showed similar serum levels of creatine kinase (CK) and its myocardialspecific isoenzyme on the first postoperative day, a similar rate of perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative need for intra-aortic balloon pump, postoperative need for inotropic support and mortality. Comparison of groups I and III showed similar serum levels of CK, amylase, lactate dehydrogenase and creatinine on the first postoperative day, a similar complication rate and mortality rate. However, normothermic CPB resulted in a shorter bypass time (83 ± 4 vs 98 ± 7 min, P<0.05) and interval until extubation (25.0 ± 3.8 vs 40.3 ± 7.4 h, P<0.05). In conclusion, there are no differences concerning myocardial protection, however, warm CPB shortens the perfusion time and postoperative course.     

Multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly patient is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in this population is potentially beneficial. We examined our initial experience with off-pump multivessel coronary artery revascularization in patients aged 70 years and older. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 300 off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) operations performed by a single surgeon between 1996 and 1999, 98 patients were aged 70 years and older. These patients were compared with a consecutive cohort of 497 patients aged 70 years and older operated on with CPB in the same institution from 1995 to 1996, period where OPCAB surgery was not performed in our institution. RESULTS: Patients in the beating heart group were older (75+/-4 vs. 74+/-3 years; P=0.001). Gender distribution and other preoperative risk factors were comparable for the two groups. On average, 3.0+/-0.8 and 2.8+/-0.7 grafts per patient were completed in the OPCAB and the CPB groups, respectively (P=0.007). Perioperative mortality rates (OPCAB group, 3.1%; CPB group, 3.6%), perioperative myocardial infarction (OPCAB, 2.0%; CPB, 5.1%) and neurologic events (OPCAB, 1.0%; CPB, 3.2%) were comparable for the two groups. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was lower in the OPCAB group (42 vs. 54%; P=0.05). The need for allogenic blood transfusions was significantly less in the OPCAB group (53 vs. 82%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged 70 years and older, multivessel OPCAB surgery is associated with lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation and reduced transfusion requirements. Multivessel OPCAB in the elderly patient is an acceptable alternative to procedures performed with CPB.     

Does sodium nitroprusside reduce lung injury under cardiopulmonary bypass?

Objective: We hypothesized that direct pulmonary arterial infusion of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) would ameliorate lung injury under cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: Experiments were performed on 12 adult mongrel dogs of both sexes weighing 20–28 kg. The animals were randomly divided into two groups of six animals each. All animals were subjected to total cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and moderate hypothermia (28°C core temperature). During total CPB, the aorta was clamped together with the pulmonary artery to prevent any antegrade flow to the lungs. After cardioplegic arrest for 120 min, the animals were rewarmed, weaned from CPB, and their condition stabilized for another 90 min. After the release of the aortic cross-clamp, the dogs received either a 5% glucose solution as a placebo (group I) or SNP (0.5 μg/kg per min) (group II), both infused into the pulmonary arterial line. The infusion was stopped after 60 min. To measure lung tissue malondialdehyde (MDA), water content and polymorphonuclear leukocytes count, lung tissue samples were taken before CPB and after weaning from CPB. In addition, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO₂) for tissue oxygenation was calculated by obtaining arterial blood gas samples. Results: Values of MDA before CPB of 42.0±5.3 nmol/g of tissue rose to 67.6±5.7 nmol/g of tissue after weaning from CPB in group I (P=0.028). In group II MDA values also increased from 43.1±4.3 to 52.4±5.7 nmol MDA/g of tissue after weaning from CPB (P=0.046). The MDA increase in group II after CPB was found to be significantly lower than that for group I (P=0.004). The wet-to-dry lung weight ratio in the sodium nitroprusside group was 5.1±0.2, significantly lower than in the control group (6.8±0.4), (P=0.01). AaDO₂ increased significantly in group I (P=0.028). There was no statistically significant difference (P=0.065) between groups I and II. During histopathological examination it was observed that neutrophil counts in the lung parenchyma rose significantly after CPB in both groups. The increase in group I was significantly larger than that in group II (P<0.001). Conclusions: The results represented in our study indicate that pulmonary arterial infusion of sodium nitroprusside during reperfusion can reduce lung injury under cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Evaluation of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump support in high risk coronary patients

Objective: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an established additional support to pharmacological treatment of the failing heart after myocardial infarction, unstable angina and cardiac surgery. The effect of preoperative IABP in high risk patients was evaluated. Methods: Between June 1994 and March 1996 all high risk patients for CABG (two or more of these criteria: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, left main stem stenosis ≥70%, REDO-CABG, unstable angina) were randomized into either of 3 groups: (1) IABP 1 day prior to surgery, (2) IABP 1–2 h prior to CPB and (3) no preoperative IABP, controls. Exclusion criteria: cardiogenic shock preoperatively. Fifty-two patients have entered the study—group 1 (13 patients), group 2 (19 patients) and group 3 (20 patients). Preoperative patient characteristics and operative data revealed no group differences. There were 56% REDO's, unstable angina 59%, LVEF≤40%, 87% (34.0±11.6%) and left main stem stenosis in 35%. Results: The CPB-time was shorter in groups 1 and 2 88.7±20.3 min than in group 3 105.5±26.8 min, P<0.001, while ischemia time did not differ. Hospital mortality was higher in group 3, 25% vs. 6% (groups 1 and 2). Postoperative low cardiac output was seen in 12 patients (60%) in group 3 vs. 6 patients (19%) in groups 1 and 2, P<0.05. Cardiac index increased significantly prior to CPB in groups 1 and 2. After CPB cardiac index was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3 and continued to increase. The IABP was removed after 3.1±1.0 days in group 3 vs. 1.3±0.6 days in groups 1 and 2, P<0.001. In group 3, 11 patients required IABP postoperatively compared to only 4 patients in groups 1 and 2. ICU stay was shorter in groups 1 and 2—2.3±0.9 days vs. 3.5±1.1 days for group 3, P=0.004. All patients received dopamin postoperatively, however in a lower dose in groups 1 and 2, 4.5 vs. 13.5 μg/kg/min. Dobutamine was added in 23% of the patients (group 1), 32% (group 2) and 95% (group 3). Adrenalin/amrinonum was required in 40% of the patients in group 3, 5% in group 2 and none in group 1. Group 1 patients had a better improvement of cardiac performance than group 2, while other parameters did not differ. Three months follow up of hospital survivors showed no group differences. Conclusions: The use of preoperative IABP in high risk patients lowers hospital mortality and shortens the stay in ICU, due to improved cardiac performance, compared to a controls. The procedure was cost-beneficial. One day preoperative IABP treatment improves cardiac performance more than 1–2 h preoperative IABP treatment, but does not significantly affect the outcome in terms of hospital mortality or postoperative morbidity.     

Hemodynamic analysis of descending versus ascending aortomyoplasty, and comparison with intra-aortic balloon pump

Objective: Descending and ascending aortomyoplasty are two surgical procedures intended to induce hemodynamic benefits similar to those of the intra-aortic-balloon-pump (IABP). To date, there have been no studies comparing the two surgical techniques. The objective of this study was to compare coronary blood flow augmentation and afterload reduction as produced by descending and ascending aortomyoplasty counterpulsation Methods: Twenty-two mongrel dogs (18–35 kg) underwent IABP application (n=7), descending (n=8), or ascending (n=7) aortomyoplasty. Left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery blood flow was measured using a Transonic Doppler flow probe. Left ventricular pressure as well as aortic pressures proximal and distal to either the aortomyoplasty site or the IABP position were monitored continuously. Results: Descending aortomyoplasty induced higher elevation in the LAD blood flow during assisted beats (27% from 10.8±4 to 13.8±6 ml/min, P<0.001) than that induced by either ascending aortomyoplasty (19% from 11.7±5 to 14±5 ml/min, P<0.001) or IABP counterpulsation (18% from 8.6±3 to 10.2±4 ml/min, P<0.001). Conversely, while ascending aortomyoplasty reduced the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 16% (from 60±18 to 50±22 mmHg, P<0.001), similar to the 16% after load reduction achieved by the IABP counterpulsation, descending aortomyoplasty failed to induce afterload reduction. Conclusions: Descending aortomyoplasty produces higher coronary blood flow augmentation than either ascending aortomyoplasty or IABP. However, afterload reduction comparable to that achieved by IABP was observed only with ascending aortomyoplasty and not with descending aortomyoplasty.     

Off-pump coronary artery grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Left main coronary artery disease (LMCD) is considered a relative contraindication to off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting. This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of OPCAB in these patients compared to an on-pump group (cardiopulmonary bypass, CPB) with LMCD. METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2002, 95 patients with left main coronary artery stenosis >50% underwent coronary revascularization. Seventy-three unselected patients underwent OPCAB and 22 underwent revascularization using CPB. The techniques used for OPCAB included the use of deep traction sutures in the posterior pericardium and stabilizers to expose the distal coronary targets. Intraluminal coronary shunts were routinely used during construction of the anastomoses. Variables were analyzed using a Student's paired t-test with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age in the OPCAB group was 59.9 years and the CPB group 61.8 years (p = 0.54). There were 56 males (77%) in the OPCAB and 18 (82%) in the CPB groups. Mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 40.3% in OPCAB and 47.3% in CPB (p = 0.015). Average number of grafts was 3.1 in OPCAB and 4.1 in CPB (p = 0.0038). There were no conversions to CPB in those patients initially chosen to undergo OPCAB. There were no early deaths in OPCAB. There was one death in CPB. Mean hospital length of stay was 6.9 days for OPCAB and 9.1 for CPB (p = 0.0159). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LMCD can undergo OPCAB grafting safely and effectively despite reduced LVEF. LMCD should no longer be seen as a contraindication to perform OPCAB grafting.     

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass in high-risk subgroups

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has pathophysiologic sequelae that may be more severe in high-risk subsets. We wanted to determine whether off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) could optimize outcomes. METHODS: Our database of 242 OPCAB patients undergoing complete revascularization was compared to a base of 483 CABG patients undergoing CPB. Results were compared for the overall series and in the following high-risk subsets: 80 years of age or older, ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction (EF) < or = 0.25), prior neurologic event or renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and reoperation. RESULTS: In the overall series, OPCAB significantly reduced the incidence of intraoperative transfusion requirements and showed a trend toward reduced morbidity in terms of postoperative neurologic and renal complications, prolonged ventilator requirement greater than 3 days, and bleeding requiring reexploration. Mortality was less in the OPCAB group (0.4% versus 2.7%, p = not significant). Similar results were achieved in the following high-risk subgroups (n = off-pump/on-pump): 80 years of age or older (n = 28/58), EF less than or equal to 25% (n = 13/26), preoperative neurologic event (n = 25/36), preoperative renal failure (n = 27/46), COPD (n = 33/43), and reoperation (n = 28/76). OPCAB decreased the incidence of prolonged ventilation in COPD patients (0/33 [0%] versus 4/43 [9.3%] p = not significant) and decreased the incidence of renal complications in the elderly (1/28 [3.6%] versus 9/58 [15.5%] p = not significant). Off-pump coronary bypass reduced but did not eliminate neurologic events in the elderly (2/28 [7.1%] versus 8/58 [13.8%] p = not significant). CONCLUSION: Off-pump coronary bypass significantly reduced the incidence of transfusion requirement compared to the CPB counterparts and had a consistent trend in reducing morbidity and mortality overall and in all high-risk subsets. Neurologic events are not eliminated in OPCAB.     

Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

The beneficial effects of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have been reported. However, the benefits of insertion of IABP electively in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) have not been established. Six hundred and twenty-five patients who underwent OPCAB form the study group. High-risk patients fulfilling two or more of the following: left main stem stenosis >70%, unstable angina, and poor left ventricular function, who had elective insertion of IABP preoperatively by the open technique (group I; n = 20) were compared with a similar high-risk group that did not (group II; n = 25). There were no significant differences in risk factors between the two groups (Euroscore 5.68). The mean number of grafts was similar. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the need for inotropes, duration of ventilation, arrhythmias, cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, and infective complications (p = NS). There were no IABP-related complications. Acute renal failure requiring hemofiltration was higher in group II (n = 5; p < 0.05). Four patients (16%) in group II required postoperative IABP. Although intensive care stay was longer in group I (27.6 +/- 15.3 vs. 18.6 +/- 9.1 hours; p < 0.05), patients in group I were discharged earlier from hospital. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups (n = 1 in each group). In high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB, routine preoperative insertion of IABP electively reduces the incidence of acute renal failure. In addition it avoids the need for emergency insertion postoperatively and may result in earlier discharge.     

老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的心肌保护作用

目的比较70岁以上老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)和体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)围术期心肌损伤程度,探讨OPCAB的心肌保护效果。方法30例老年患者分为两组,A组15例,为CABG组,B组15例,为OPCAB组。分别于术前、术中30min、术中1h、术后6h、12h、24h、72h、120h取静脉血标本,分别测定心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)水平和CKMB活性;另外记录围手术期各项临床指标。结果OPCAB组术后辅助呼吸时间较CABG组短(P<0.01),而且主动脉球囊反搏和输血例数较低(P<0.05)。CABG组与OPCAB组cTnI、CKMB的术前水平相,术后6hcTnI即有升高而后下降,术后30min至72h均较OPCAB组明显升高(P<0.05或0.01)。结论与CABG相比,OPCAB的心肌损伤较轻,心肌保护效果较好。     

A prospective, randomized study of endothelin and postoperative recovery in off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: The objectives are 2-fold: (1). to serially determine endothelin (ET) levels in arterial vascular compartments in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery using either cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump techniques, and (2). to define potential relationships between endothelial levels and specific perioperative parameters of patient recovery. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study, endothelin plasma content was measured from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using either off-pump techniques (OPCAB group, n = 25) or conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB group, n = 25) before surgery, before and after coronary artery anastomosis, and 6 and 24 hours postoperatively. Specific indices of patient recovery including pulmonary artery pressures, ventilation requirement, and hospital stay were documented for patients in both study groups. RESULTS: Postoperative systemic arterial ET levels were significantly increased by 200% in the CPB group and 50% in the OPCAB group. ET levels remained significantly higher in the CPB group relative to the OPCAB group throughout the postoperative period of observation (p < 0.05). Pulmonary artery pressures, ventilation requirement, and hospital stay were significantly increased in patients in the CPB group. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ET levels were higher in patients who underwent CPB for coronary artery bypass surgery. Increased ET in the postoperative period may contribute to a more complex recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Cumulative sum failure analysis of a policy change from on-pump to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Use of the sequential probability cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique may be more sensitive than standard statistical analyses in detecting a cluster of surgical failures. We applied CUSUM methods to evaluate the learning curve after a policy change by a single surgeon from routine on-pump (cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB]) to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive first-time coronary artery bypass patients (CPB group) were compared with the next 55 patients undergoing an attempt at routine OPCAB using the same coronary stabilizer. The goal in OPCAB patients was to obtain complete revascularization, albeit with a low threshold for conversion to CPB to maximize patient safety during the learning curve. Preoperative patient risk was calculated using previously validated models of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. The occurrence of operative mortality and nine predefined major complications (myocardial infarction, bleeding, stroke, renal failure, balloon pump use, mediastinitis, respiratory failure, life-threatening arrhythmia, and sepsis) was compared between the CPB and OPCAB groups using Wilcoxon, Fisher exact, and two-tailed t tests, as well as CUSUM methodology. An intention to treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: The CPB and OPCAB groups had similar predicted mortality and length of stays (2.2% +/- 2.5%, 8.1 +/- 2.5 days versus 2.4% +/- 3.5%, 8.1 +/- 2.4 days, respectively). The mean number of grafts per patient was 3.1 +/- 0.7 in the CPB group versus 3.0 +/- 0.7 in the OPCAB group (p = 0.45). Two of 55 (3.6%) CPB patients died, as opposed to 1 of 55 (1.8%) OPCAB patients (p = 0.99). Eight of 55 CPB patients (14.5%) incurred major complications, as opposed to 4 of 55 (7.3%) OPCAB patients (p = 0.36). Median hospital length of stay was 6.0 days in the CPB group versus 5.0 days in the OPCAB group (p = 0.28). On CUSUM analysis, the failure curve in CPB patients approached the upper 80% alert line after eight cases, whereas the curve in OPCAB patients reached below the lower 80% (reassurance) boundary 28 cases after the policy change, indicating superior results in the OPCAB group despite the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: A policy change from coronary artery bypass on CPB to routinely attempting OPCAB can be accomplished safely despite the learning curve. CUSUM analysis was more sensitive than standard statistical methods in detecting a cluster of surgical failures and successes.     

A prospective evaluation of hemodynamic instability during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: Despite recognized hemodynamic derangements during cardiac displacement, most patients appear to tolerate the off-pump procedure well. However, some patients unpredictably become hemodynamically unstable requiring emergency cardiopulmonary bypass or intra-aortic balloon pump support. After an experience of 5306 multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypasses (OPCABs), this study was undertaken to determine the factors that would identify the patients who were at a higher risk for the procedure. DESIGN: Prospective clinical investigation. SETTING: Tertiary care academic cardiac care center. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred consecutive patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB from September to December 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Various cardiac and extracardiac factors were charted in prespecified data-entry forms. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to determine if any identifiable factors were predictors of a higher risk of unacceptable hemodynamic instability during OPCAB. Institution of IABP support or conversion to CPB were the endpoints of the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 500 patients studied, significant hemodynamic instability developed in 24 (4.8%) patients. IABP support was instituted in 16 (3.2%) patients, and 8 (1.6%) were converted to CPB. Stepwise logistic regression identified ejection fraction <25% (p < 0.001), myocardial infarction of <1-month duration (p = 0.009), congestive heart failure (p = 0.016), and preoperative hemodynamic instability (p = 0.057) as predictors of conversion during OPCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction <25%, myocardial infarction of <1-month duration, congestive heart failure, or preoperative hemodynamic instability constitute the high-risk group for OPCAB.     

冠心病手术方式对IABP应用的影响

目的:探讨冠心病手术方式对主动脉内球囊反搏(intra-aortic balloon pump,IABP)的影响。方法;冠心病手术176例,27例为非体外循环心脏跳动下的手术。在149例体外循环(cardio-pulmonary bypass,CPB)下的手术中,单纯冠状动脉搭桥(coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)35例,CABG 激光心肌血管重建(Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization,TMLR)联合手术114例,其中29例加做室壁瘤切除、室间隔穿孔修补、瓣膜置换手术,9例于术中安置临时心外膜起搏器。结果:149例体外循环下的手术中共置入IABP23例,其中120例常规手术组中应用IABP15例,29例有附加手术组中应用IABP8例,而27例非体外循环下的手术中无IABP的应用。结论:(1)应用LABP数量在常规手术组与术中加做室壁瘤切除、瓣膜置换术或成型术、室间隔穿孔修补术(p<0.05),安置临时心外膜起搏器(P<0.01),组比较结果均有统计学意义;(2)激光心肌血管重建术,无论与何种冠心病手术联合应用,无论激光打孔数量多少,都没有增加IABP的应用;(3)未发现冠脉搭桥数量与IABP有关。     

Cardiotomy Suction: A Major Source of Brain Lipid Emboli During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Background. Brain injury remains a significant problem in patients undergoing cardiac surgery assisted by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Autopsy brain specimens of patients after cardiac operations with CPB reveal numerous acellular lipid deposits (10 to 70 μm) in the microvasculature. We hypothesize that these small capillary and arterial dilatations result from a diffuse inflammatory response to CPB or from emboli delivered by the bypass circuit. This study was undertaken to determine which aspect of CPB is most clearly associated with these dilatations.

Methods. Thirteen dogs were studied in four groups: group I (n = 3), right-heart CPB; group II (n = 2), lower-extremity CPB; group III (n = 3), hypothermic CPB; and group IV (n = 5), hypothermic CPB with cardiotomy suction. All dogs in all groups were maintained on CPB for 60 minutes and then euthanized. Brain specimens were harvested, fixed in ethanol, embedded in celloidin, and stained with the alkaline phosphate histochemical technique so that dilatations could be counted.

Results. All dogs completed the protocol. The mean density of dilatations per square centimeter for each group was as follows: group I, 1.77 ± 0.77; group II, 4.17 ± 1.65; group III, 4.54 ± 1.69; and group IV, 46.5 ± 14.5. In group IV (cardiotomy suction), dilatation density was significantly higher than in group III (hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass) (p = 0.04) and all other groups (p = 0.04).

Conclusions. Blood aspirated from the surgical field and subsequently reinfused into dogs undergoing CPB produces a greater density of small capillary and arterial dilatations than CPB without cardiotomy suction, presumably because of lipid microembolization.     

Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients

Several recent studies have highlighted the potential benefits of using off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery, particularly in high-risk patients. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the effect of OPCAB on the incidence of stroke compared with coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in elderly patients. We performed a meta-analysis of all observational studies, published in MEDLINE between 1999 and 2002 and a comparison between the OPCAB and CPB techniques in elderly patients was performed with the outcome of interest being the incidence of stroke. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 70 years or older. Nine studies are included in the meta-analysis. The total number of subjects included was 4,475 patients, of which, 1,253 underwent OPCAB (28%) and 3,222 (72%) underwent CPB. The meta-analysis showed that the OPCAB technique was associated with significantly lower incidence of stroke in elderly patients compared with the CPB technique (1% vs 3%), with an odds ratio of 0.38% to 95% (CI, 0.22 to 0.65). We did not identify any significant heterogeneity and funnel plot asymmetry between the studies included in the meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis including variables predicting stroke, mortality, and study characteristics did not show any associations affecting the calculated odds ratio of stroke. Despite the fact that this is a meta-analysis of observational studies and adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors between OPCAB and CPB patients was not possible, we believe that this study suggests that the OPCAB technique might be associated with reduced incidence of stroke in the elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.     

Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit extracorporeal circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and with off-pump technique in CABG patients: selected parameters of coagulation and inflammatory system.

OBJECTIVE: Closed circuit extracorporeal circulation (CCECC) has been developed to reduce deleterious effects of standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This study compares the effects of CCECC (CORx system), CPB, and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) on red blood cell damage, coagulation activation, fibrinolysis and cytokine expression. METHODS: Thirty patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Twenty of them were randomized into two groups: CCECC (n = 10), CPB (n = 10). While not randomized, OPCAB (n = 10) served as a separate reference group. CCECC and CPB patients received cardioplegic arrest. Interleukin 6 (IL-6), free hemoglobin (fHb), von Willebrand factor activity (vWf), thrombin-antithrombin-III-complex (TATc), prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F 1+2) and plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAPc) were assessed preoperatively, perioperatively and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: CCECC showed significantly lower red blood cell damage than CPB (fHb: CCECC, 7.1+/- 5.7 micromol/l; CPB, 16.8+/-11.4 micromol/l; P = 0.025; OPCAB, 3.4+/-1.1 micromol/l). Perioperatively, CCECC exhibited significantly lower activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis than CPB, but did not differ from OPCAB (vWf: CCECC, 133+/-52%; CPB, 241+/-128%; P = 0.052; OPCAB, 153+/-58%; TATc: CCECC, 4.7+/-0.9 ng/ml; CPB, 31.1+/-15.8 ng/ml; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 2.4+/-0.6 ng/ml; PAPc: CCECC, 214+/-30 ng/ml; CPB, 897+/-367 ng/ml; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 253+/-98 ng/ml). In contrast, fibrinolysis markers and IL-6 were markedly increased in CCECC postoperatively (PAPc: CCECC, 458+/-98 ng/ml; CPB, 159+/-128 ng/ml; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 262+/-174 ng/ml; IL-6: CCECC, 123.4+/-49.8 pg/dl; CPB, 18.8+/-13.1 pg/dl; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 31.6+/-26.2 pg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: CCECC for CABG is associated with a significant reduction of red blood cell damage and activation of coagulation cascades similar to OPCAB when compared with conventional CPB while a delayed fibrinolytic and inflammatory activity was observed. These findings require further investigation to verify the promising concept of CCECC.