Outcomeanalyse nach offener Rekonstruktion von Rotatorenmanschettenrupturen Eine vergleichende Beurteilung neuer Bewertungsverfahren

Outcome evaluation is becoming increasingly important for reconstructive surgery in musculoskeletal diseases. In addition to established shoulder-scores, new outcome-scores are being developed to cover all effects caused by a disease or intervention. Three validated, self-administered shoulder questionnaires were applied prospectively in 23 otherwise healthy patients suffering from rotator cuff deficiency. These were correlated to the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score and to a visual analogue scale for satisfaction. 7 women and 16 men with combined tears of supraspinatus and infraspinatus (mean age 55.3 +/- 10.5, r/l: 14/9, FU 57.8 +/- 15.7 weeks) were gathered prospectively and evaluated pre- and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index (ASES), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Module (DASH questionnaire). In addition, a visual analogue scale for satisfaction was employed. All four scores as well as the visual analogue scale revealed improvement at a statistically significant level (paired, two-tailed t-test, P < 0.01) after surgery. All questionnaires had a significant correlation with the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (Pearson's correlation coefficient: ASES: r = 0.871, P < 0.01; DASH: r = -0.758, P = < 0.01; SST: r = 0.494, P < 0.05). All were easy to apply and provided a reliable, postoperative evaluation of shoulder function. The SST was easy to apply, however compound outcome analysis was only possible with the ASES Shoulder Index and the DASH questionnaire. The DASH scale was the most complex evaluation instrument. The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score comprises a physical examination which is advantageous but must be carried out in the clinic. For postoperative assessment, without the patient having to return to the clinic, the ASES Shoulder Index is preferred as it correlates well with the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (r = 0.871) and the visual analogue scale for satisfaction (r = 0.762).     

Outcome analysis following open rotator cuff repair. Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales

Evaluation of upper extremity function after reconstructive surgery is increasingly important both to predict outcome and for the control of cost-effectiveness. Three validated, self-administered shoulder questionnaires were applied prospectively in 23 otherwise healthy patients with rotator cuff deficiency and correlated to the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score and a visual analogue scale for satisfaction. Seven women and 16 men with combined tears of supraspinatus and infraspinatus (mean age 55.3 ± 10.5 years, r/l: 14/9, follow-up 57.8 ± 15.7 weeks) were gathered prospectively and evaluated pre- and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Index, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Module (DASH questionnaire). Additionally, a visual analogue scale for satisfaction was employed. All four scores and the visual analogue scale revealed improvement at a statistically significant level (P < 0.01) after surgery. All questionnaires showed a significant correlation with the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (ASES: r = 0.871, P < 0.01; DASH: r = –0.758, P < 0.01, SST: r = 0.494, P < 0.05, Pearson’s correlation coefficient). Taken together, all questionnaires were easy to apply, and reliable evaluation of shoulder function was possible with significant correlation to the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score postoperatively. The SST was easy to apply, and compound outcome analysis was possible with the ASES Shoulder Index and DASH questionnaire. The DASH scale was the most complex evaluation instrument. The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score comprises a physical examination, which is advantageous but restricts the application to the office. For postoperative assessment without the patient having to return to the clinic, the ASES Shoulder Index is preferred because of its good correlation to the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (r = 0.871) and the visual analogue scale for satisfaction (r = 0.762). Received: 4 October 1999     

Lessons learned during the cross-cultural adaptation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder form into German

Cross-cultural adaptation and testing of reliability and validity were performed by use of a sample of 118 patients after shoulder arthroplasty. They completed a questionnaire booklet containing the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Short Form 36, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and 1 week later, they completed the ASES questionnaire again. The cross-cultural adaptation procedure revealed no major problems. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the subscales for pain and function and for the total score were very high (>0.84); the ICC for the subscale instability was unacceptably low. Function of the contralateral side was consistently better for all items (P < .01). Reliability for both function scales was similar (ICC >0). The ASES scores showed moderate correlation of 0.57 to 0.67 with the various scales of the SF-36 and higher correlation with the DASH (0.84) and SPADI (0.92). The German ASES showed good reliability and validity and can be used for shoulder-specific patient self-assessment in comparison to the contralateral (unaffected) side and provides additional information to objective parameters. The instability domain does not provide any additional clinical information.     

Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity.

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure was developed to evaluate disability and symptoms in single or multiple disorders of the upper limb at one point or at many points in time. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the DASH in a group of diverse patients and to compare the results with those obtained with joint-specific measures. METHODS: Two hundred patients with either wrist/hand or shoulder problems were evaluated by use of questionnaires before treatment, and 172 (86%) were re-evaluated 12 weeks after treatment. Eighty-six patients also completed a test-retest questionnaire three to five days after the initial (baseline) evaluation. The questionnaire package included the DASH, the Brigham (carpal tunnel) questionnaire, the SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index), and other markers of pain and function. Correlations or t-tests between the DASH and the other measures were used to assess construct validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and other summary statistics. Responsiveness was described using standardized response means, receiver operating characteristics curves, and correlations between change in DASH score and change in scores of other measures. Standard response means were used to compare DASH responsiveness with that of the Brigham questionnaire and the SPADI in each region. RESULTS: The DASH was found to correlate with other measures (r > 0.69) and to discriminate well, for example, between patients who were working and those who were not (p<0.0001). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96) exceeded guidelines. The responsiveness of the DASH (to self-rated or expected change) was comparable with or better than that of the joint-specific measures in the whole group and in each region. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence was provided of the validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the DASH. This study also demonstrated that the DASH had validity and responsiveness in both proximal and distal disorders, confirming its usefulness across the whole extremity.     

Measuring shoulder injury function: common scales and checklists

The increasing shift towards patient-centred healthcare has lead to an emergence of patient-reported outcome instruments to quantify functional outcomes in orthopaedic patients. Unfortunately, selecting an instrument for use in a shoulder trauma population is often problematic because most shoulder instruments were initially designed for use with chronic shoulder pathology patients. To ensure an instrument is valid, reliable, and sensitive to clinical changes, it is important to obtain psychometric evidence of its use in the target population.Four commonly used shoulder outcome instruments are reviewed in this paper: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES); Constant-Murley shoulder score (CMS); Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH); Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Each instrument was reviewed for floor or ceiling effects, validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability. Additionally, evidence of each instrument's psychometric properties was sought in shoulder fracture populations.Based on the current literature, each instrument has limited amounts of evidence to support their use in shoulder trauma populations. Overall, psychometric evaluations in isolated shoulder fracture populations remain scarce, and clinicians must remember that an instrument's properties are defined for the population tested and not the instrument. Therefore, caution must always be exercised when using an instrument that has not been fully evaluated in trauma populations.     

Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty

To investigate shoulder scoring systems used in Europe and North America and how outcomes might be classified after shoulder joint replacement. All research papers published in four major journals in 2012 and 2013 were reviewed for the shoulder scoring systems used in their published papers. A method of identifying how outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty might be used to categorize patients into fair, good, very good and excellent outcomes was explored using the outcome evaluations from patients treated in our own unit. A total of 174 research articles that were published in the four journals used some form of shoulder scoring system. The outcome from shoulder arthroplasty in our unit has been evaluated using the constant score (CS) and the oxford shoulder score and these scores have been used to evaluate individual patient outcomes. CSs of < 30 = unsatisfactory; 30-39 = fair; 40-59 = good; 60-69 = very good; and 70 and over = excellent. The most popular shoulder scoring systems in North America were Simple Shoulder Test and American shoulder and elbow surgeons standard shoulder assessment form score and in Europe CS, Oxford Shoulder Score and DASH score.     

Validation and reliability of a Japanese version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a simple disease specific questionnaire that is used to evaluate the impact of shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to translate the SPADI into Japanese (SPADI-Jp) and evaluate its reliability and validity in Japanese patients with shoulder disorders.MethodsCross-cultural adaptation of the SPADI was performed according to international guidelines. A total of 100 patients with shoulder disorders participated in this study. Each participant was asked to finish the SPADI-Jp, Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) at the initial visit. Thirty-four patients repeated the SPADI-Jp to assess the test–retest reliability. The test–retest reliability was quantified using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency. The construct validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.ResultsInternal consistency in the SPADI-Jp was very high (0.969), as measured by the Cronbach's alpha. The ICC of the SPADI-Jp was 0.930. There was a strong, positive correlation between the DASH and the SPADI-Jp (r = 0.837, p < 0.001). The SPADI-Jp was significantly correlated with most of the SF-36 subscales. The correlations of the SPADI-Jp with physical subscales of the SF-36 were stronger than those with the other subscales.ConclusionsWe demonstrated that the SPADI-Jp is a reliable and valid self-assessment tool. Because cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability of the disease-specific questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability have not been evaluated in Japan, the SPADI-Jp can be useful for evaluating such patients in the Japanese population.     

Critical appraisal of subjective outcome measures used in the assessment of shoulder disability

INTRODUCTION

Objective measures can be impractical in some settings, because they are time consuming and require face-to-face contact. More recently, there is an increasing trend towards the use of subjective outcome measures. Hence, in this article, five common subjective shoulder outcome measures are critically appraised in terms of their development, validity, relia-lity, responsiveness and clinical application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following an extensive literature search, five common shoulder patient-based scores were identified: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ-UK), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ). These questionnaires were then critically appraised in terms of their development process, validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical application.

RESULTS

The SDQ-UK has shown good construct validity but there is no data available regarding internal consistency, reliability and responsiveness. The SPADI has good internal consistency, fair reliability with adequate criterion and construct validity. The DASH has shown to have good construct validity, excellent test–re-test reliability and responsiveness to change. The OSS has good sensitivity, validity and responsiveness. Though SRQ has good internal consistency, its reproducibility and responsiveness are poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this critical appraisal, the DASH received the best ratings for its clinimetric properties followed by the OSS.     

Analysis of Evidence-Based Medicine for Shoulder Instability

Clinical research has become a major influencing factor in the determination of treatment choice in our society. Outcome data have been requested by third-party payers, patients, and administrators alike. Currently, there are over 10 different scoring systems that have been used to evaluate the efficacy of treatment for shoulder instability. Some of these scoring systems are based on the specific condition of shoulder instability; however, other systems are broadly based to incorporate a spectrum of shoulder conditions. This review summarizes the process of proper development and testing of the scoring systems, discusses their role in clinical research with respect to shoulder instability, and explains the dichotomy of postoperative recurrence of instability and high shoulder scores. The Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ), Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score (MISS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Oxford Instability Score (OIS), and Simple Shoulder Test were shown to be reliable for patients with instability. The SRQ, MISS, WOSI, OIS, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score have all been shown to be largely responsive. There are 2 shoulder scoring systems, the WOSI and the MISS, that we recommend be used to evaluate shoulder instability. The SRQ and OIS were found to be less responsive for patients with instability compared with patients with other shoulder dysfunctions. Other scoring systems lack inter-rater reliability, validity, and/or responsiveness for patients in the instability population. The optimal scoring system for patients with upper extremity problems other than those with shoulder instability has yet to be determined; however, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score may be considered, because this instrument has been proven to be valid, reliable, and responsive.     

Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder

A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).     

Reliability by surgical status of self-reported outcomes in patients who have shoulder pathologies

STUDY DESIGN: A test-retest design was used to evaluate the reliability of the self-report sections of 4 shoulder pain and disability scales. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare interitem consistency and test-retest reliability by surgical status (postoperative versus nonoperative) and to evaluate the effect of surgical status in the prediction of retest scores. BACKGROUND: Patients and healthcare providers evaluate shoulder status based on self-evaluations of pain and disability. Shoulder outcome measures have been developed that include self-reports, but the properties of these measures have not been assessed by surgical status. METHODS AND MEASURES: A questionnaire containing self-report sections of 4 shoulder scales was administered to study participants twice with 1 week between administrations. The outcome measures examined were the: (1) University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score; (2) Constant-Murley Scale (CMS); (3) American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) Shoulder Index; and (4) Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to estimate the test-retest reliability of each of the scales and subscales. The interitem consistencies of the multi-item subscales were assessed using Cronbach's alpha. The effect of surgical status on shoulder outcome scale reliability was evaluated using a general linear models approach. RESULTS: The interitem consistency estimates for the multi-item scales were high with both operative and nonoperative participants (0.88 to 0.96). With the exception of the satisfaction subscale of the UCLA Shoulder Score for the nonsurgical group, the estimated intraclass coefficients ranged from 0.51 to 0.91. The prediction of UCLA-satisfaction and ASES-disability, pain, and total retest scores was improved with the addition of surgical status into a regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The examined scales exhibited good internal consistency across surgical status. The postsurgical sample's reproducibility estimates tended to be higher than those of the nonsurgical sample. Reliability of shoulder outcome scales can be affected by patient surgical status.     

A comparison of functional, patient-based scores in subacromial impingement

The goal of this study was to compare the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) for their correlation, agreement, sensitivity to change, and test-retest reliability in patients with a clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement. All patients attending a specialist subacromial impingement clinic over a 6-month period completed the OSS, SPADI, and SF-36 at each visit. A total of 323 sets of observations were recorded in 110 patients. The first 38 of these patients were also sent the questionnaires to complete before their visit. There was good correlation between the OSS and SPADI scores (correlation coefficient = 0.85) and good agreement between the scores on each scale (weighted kappa = 0.79). The correlation with total SF-36 was poor (0.37 for OSS and 0.26 for SPADI). The OSS and SPADI showed good effect sizes compared with the total SF-36 score and good test-retest reliability. These data support the use of the OSS or SPADI in patients with subacromial impingement.     

Factor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis

Background  

The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that aims to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder disease. It consists of a pain section and a disability section with 13 items being responded to on visual analogue scales. Few researchers have investigated SPADI validity in specified diagnostic groups, although the selection of an evaluative instrument should be based on evidence of validity in the target patient group. The aim of the present study was to investigate factor structure of the SPADI in a study population of patients with adhesive capsulitis.     

Short-term results after reversed shoulder arthroplasty (Delta III) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and irreparable rotator cuff tear

The purpose of this study was to describe the outcome after reversed Delta III shoulder prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and irreparable rotator cuff tear. Fifteen patients (17 joints) were prospectively analysed using the Constant-Murley score (CS). Comprehensive outcome measure was carried out by means of four widely used questionnaires as well as clinical and radiographic examinations at an average of 24.3 months postoperatively. The CS improved significantly from 19 to 59.5 points. The mental (MSC) and physical (PCS) component summary score of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) reached 108% and 77%, respectively, while the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) was 58% of a comparative norm population. Remaining deficits were documented by SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability; 54.4 points) and ASES (clinical and patient-orientated American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; 84.3 and 61.3 points, respectively). No radiological signs of loosening were found, but scapular notching occurred in four cases. Reversed arthroplasty provides a substantial improvement of shoulder function in patients with RA. The high incidence of notching is of concern.     

Reliability and validity of the upper limb DASH questionnaire in patients with distal radius fractures

AIM: The purpose of the study was to verify test criteria of the upper-limb DASH questionnaire in patients with Colles' fractures. METHODS: 107 of 139 patients with Colles' fractures treated operatively were examined and asked to complete the questionnaire. To establish reliability, the item answers of all questionnaires were analysed by using Cronbach's Alpha correlation coefficient and corrected item total correlation. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing the DASH points with clinical measures according to Gartland/Werley and Castaing (Spearman correlation coefficient). Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the DASH points of patients with AO-type A/B fractures and AO-type C fractures (Mann-Whitney U-Test). RESULTS: 2.7 percent of all questionnaires were unusuable. The time to fill out the questionnaire was on average 12 minutes. Cronbach's alpha values were high in all scales (alpha > 0.8). No items were found unsuitable (corrected item total correlation > 0.5 in 28 of 30 questions). DASH scores were correlated with ROM deficits and clinical measures of wrist function (r = 0.53; r = 0.59; r = 0.52, p < 0.01). The questionnaire could discriminate patients with different fracture types (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DASH is a workable, reliable and valid instrument for patients with Colles' fractures.     

Factor structure and validity of the shoulder pain and disability index in a population-based study of people with shoulder symptoms

Background  

The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that aims to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate the construct validity and factor structure of the SPADI in a population-based study of patients with self-reported chronic shoulder symptoms.     

Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?

This prospective study evaluates if the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is an adequately responsive outcome measure in carpal tunnel syndrome by comparing it with the disease-specific Boston questionnaire (BQ). To measure responsiveness (sensitivity to clinical change), 57 patients with a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome completed the DASH and BQ preoperatively and again 3 months after open carpal tunnel decompression. A second group of 31 patients completed the questionnaires in the outpatient clinic and again 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability. The time to complete all questionnaires was recorded. Responsiveness of the DASH is comparable with the BQ with standardized response means of 0.66, 1.07 and 0.62 for the DASH, BQ-symptoms and BQ-function, respectively. Test-retest data show both questionnaires are reliable. Mean times to complete questionnaires were 6.8minutes (DASH) and 5.6minutes (BQ). This study concludes that the DASH questionnaire is a reliable, responsive and practical outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome.     

The Greek version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): translation,cultural adaptation,and validation in patients with rotator cuff tear

Background

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt a Greek version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire and to validate its usage in Greek patients.

Materials and methods

A forward and backward translation was performed, and the final version of the Greek questionnaire was administered to 134 outpatients (mean age 47.4 ± 14.5) with rotator cuff tear under conservative treatment. The questionnaire was re-administered 2–5 days later to assess test–retest reliability. Patients completed the Greek SPADI, the Greek version of the Quick DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and the EuroQoL EQ-5D. 102 of the 134 questionnaires were considered valid.

Results

The internal consistencies of the SPADI total and its subscales measured with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were high (0.932 for SPADI-Total, 0.899 for SPADI-Disability, 0.905 for SPADI-Pain). Intraclass correlation coefficients showed excellent test–retest reliability (0.899 for Disability, 0.902 for Pain, and 0.929 for total SPADI). A significantly high positive correlation was found between the SPADI total score and its subscales, and Quick DASH for Pain and Disability. Significant correlations were also found between SPADI scales and EQ-5D variables. There was a moderate positive correlation with the variables “self-reliance” (r = 0.66), “common activities” (r = 0.58), and “pain/discomfort” (r = 0.49), and a weaker correlation with the “mobility” variable (r = 0.20). Factor analysis (PAF method) revealed a bidimensional formation of the SPADI. Eight items (five pain/three disability) weighted the first factor by >0.5, and five disability items weighted the second factor.

Conclusions

The Greek SPADI represents a valid and reliable tool for measuring pain and disability in patients with painful shoulder disorders.

Level of evidence

Level 3.

     

Predictors of wrist function and health status after operative treatment of fractures of the distal radius

PURPOSE: To identify the most important determinants of physician-based and patient-based scoring systems for the wrist and upper extremity after operative treatment of a fracture of the distal radius, with the hypothesis that pain is the strongest determinant of both types of scores. METHODS: Eighty-four patients were evaluated a minimum of 6 months after operative fixation of an unstable distal radius fracture using 2 physician-based evaluation instruments (the Mayo Wrist Score and the Gartland and Werley Score) and an upper extremity-specific health status questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; DASH). Multivariate analysis of variance and multiple linear regression modeling were used to identify the degree to which various factors affect variability in the scores derived with these measures. RESULTS: The physician-based scoring systems showed moderate correlation with each other and with DASH scores. The results of multiple linear regression modeling were as follows (percent variability accounted for by the best fit model/model with top factor alone): Mayo: 54% grip and flexion arc/47% grip alone; Gartland and Werley: 70% pain, flexion arc, radiocarpal arthritis, and duration of follow-up/53% pain alone; DASH: 71% pain, forearm arc, and type of fracture/65% pain alone. CONCLUSIONS: At early follow-up, pain dominates the patient's perception of function after recovery from an operatively treated distal radius fracture as measured by the DASH score and the physician-based rating according to the system of Gartland and Werley. The Mayo Wrist Score is determined primarily by grip strength rather than pain. Because perception of pain and strength of grip have been shown to be influenced by psychosocial factors in some individuals, both patient-based and physician-based measures of wrist function may be vulnerable to illness behavior. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic III.     

Patient related functional outcome of glenoid rim fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient related outcome and shoulder stability following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in patients with glenoid rim fractures. After a median follow-up of four years, 14 patients completed the Rowe Shoulder Stability Score and Quick DASH questionnaire. The median Rowe score was 90 (Q1: 88, Q3: 100). Results were graded excellent in 11 patients and good in three. The median DASH score was 4.6 (Q1: 0, Q3: 32). In conclusion this study showed that ORIF of type la and 2 glenoid rim fractures provided satisfactory results with respect to prevention of instability. However, patient reported functional outcome was disappointing in 21% of the patients.