Scapular notching in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Now what?

Scapular notching is a well-known complication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. While early reports revealed no ill effects on clinical outcomes, later research has shown decreased range of motion, decreased strength, lower Constant scores, and higher pain scores. It appears that lowering the glenosphere on the glenoid decreases contact between the humeral component and the inferior bony pillar, decreasing the rate and grade of notching. Once notching occurs after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, it appears that close observation in an asymptomatic patient is sufficient. Revisions in symptomatic patients require debridement, bone grafting, and baseplate augments.     

How does gout impact outcomes following primary shoulder arthroplasty?: Gout and shoulder arthroplasty

IntroductionStudies have shown that the overall prevalence of gout has increased. Data shows that patients with gout have worse outcomes following total joint arthroplasty, however studies investigating the effects of gout following primary total shoulder (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with and without gout undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty, evaluating (1) in-hospital length of stay (LOS); (2) medical complications; (3) cost of care.MethodsA retrospective query using a nationwide administrative claims database was performed from January 2005 to March 2014 for all patients who underwent primary TSA and RSA for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, yielding a total of 11,414 patients to be included. For the TSA cohort, 7702 patients were identified within the study (n = 1,185) and control (n = 6417) cohorts. Similarly, 3712 patients were identified within the RSA cohorts (gout n = 621 and control n = 3,091). Primary endpoints were in-hospital LOS, 90-day medical complications, and total global 90-day episode of care (EOC) costs. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds (OR) of medical complications, whereas Welch's t-tests were used to compare LOS and costs of care. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsPatients with gout undergoing primary TSA (3- vs. 2-days, P < .0001) and RSA (3- vs. 2-days, P < .0001) had significantly longer in-hospital LOS. Gout patients undergoing either TSA (41.2 vs. 11.3%; OR: 3.30, P < .0001) or RSA had significantly higher incidence and odds (50.6 vs. 17.9%; OR: 2.10, P < .0001) of developing 90-day medical complications compared to their counterparts. Study group patients incurred significantly higher total global 90-day episode of care costs following both TSA ($15,007.84 vs. $13,447.06, P < .0001) and RSA ($19,659.27 vs. $16,783.70, P< .0001).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that patients with gout undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty have longer in-hospital LOS, in addition to higher rates of complications, and increased costs of care. The study can be used by orthopedic surgeons to educate patients who have gout on complications which may occur following their surgical procedure.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.     

Does critical shoulder angle predict abduction motion and acromion-tuberosity impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BackgroundVirtual planning software for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has introduced the ability to optimize implant position in an effort to maximize bony impingement–free motion. Abduction impingement typically occurs between the glenoid and polyethylene or between the tuberosities and the acromion or coracoid. Acromion-tuberosity impingement has been considered less desirable, as it may create additional stress on the acromion. Patients with a large acromion overhang may have higher rates of acromion-tuberosity impingement. As the critical shoulder angle (CSA) represents a larger distance from the glenoid face to the acromion, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of implant selection and position on abduction motion and acromion-tuberosity impingement, with a focus on the association to CSA. We hypothesize that a larger CSA will be associated with less abduction motion and an increase in acromion-tuberosity impingement.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort case series of 85 consecutive patients who underwent RSA from June 2020 to January 2021. Humeral and glenoid components were implanted virtually (SurgiCase) using a standard protocol for a single implant system (DJO AltiVate Short Stem Reverse) with an inset humeral component. Implant variables analyzed included baseplate location (central vs. inferior glenoid), glenosphere lateralization (10 mm vs. 6 mm), and humeral shell (standard vs. semiconstrained). The maximal degree of abduction and location of impingement were recorded at external rotation of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Implant combinations that resulted in no impingement and no motion were recorded.ResultsIncrease in CSA was associated with acromion-tuberosity impingement for nearly every combination at 0° and 45° external rotation; however, there were no significant associations between CSA and maximum abduction motion. Acromion-tuberosity impingement was associated with central glenosphere placement in all degrees of external rotation (P < .001), use of a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere for 0° (P < .001) and 45° (P = .076), and using a standard polyethylene shell for 0° (P = .032) and 45° external rotation (P = .007). Maximal abduction motion was associated with inferior placement (P < .001), and use of a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere (P < .001) in all positions of external rotation but was not influenced by the polyethylene type.ConclusionIncreased CSA is associated with acromion-tuberosity impingement and can be used to screen for patients at risk for bony impingement in abduction. Placement of the glenosphere centrally and use of a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere were associated with higher rates of acromion-tuberosity impingement. Maximal abduction can be achieved using a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere and inferior placement.     

Subscapularis integrity and patient-reported outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty: does time to mobilization matter?

BackgroundMaintaining subscapularis integrity may be a significant variable in optimizing patient outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty. Multiple factors have been reported in orthopedic literature as a contributor to subscapularis failure. Most surgeons follow a protocol that calls for some period of immobilization. However, time of mobilization and rehabilitation is still a point of discussion, as no consensus currently exists. Our study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of patients who followed a traditional immobilization protocol to those who underwent rapid mobilization.MethodsA single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between December 2015 and May 2018. Patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized using a 1:1 random allocation into 2 groups: prolonged immobilization for 4 weeks or rapid mobilization at 1 week. All cases were performed by a single, fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon with standard pre- and intra-operative protocols. Metallic markers were used to mark the musculotendinous junction of the subscapularis tendon. Postoperatively, patients were notified of their randomization assignment and provided detailed instructions on when to begin mobilization. Patient-reported outcome measures, physical examination, and radiologic assessments were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 32 months postoperatively. Our primary outcome was clinical and radiographic subscapularis failure.ResultsForty-three patients consented with 40 procedures randomized to the 2 cohorts. Among these 40 procedures, there were up to 235 follow-up visits over 32 months. Of the 40 procedures, 2 (5.0%) were complicated with a postoperative tear, both associated with a weak belly test and radiographically confirmed with medialization of the surrogate markers on plain radiographs. No statistically significant difference was seen between the prolonged immobilization and rapid mobilization groups for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, Constant Shoulder Score, Visual Analog Scale Score, Simple Shoulder Test Score, and Short-Form Surveys at any follow-up point (all P > .05). On evaluating active forward flexion and external rotation, no statistically significant difference was also appreciated between the 2 groups at any time point (all P > .05).DiscussionOur randomized control trial compared currently accepted protocols to immobilize for 4 weeks following total shoulder arthroplasty using a peel to early mobilization at 1 week and found no statistical and clinical difference in outcomes. However, further study is necessary before a consensus recommendation can be made.     

Timing of shoulder arthroplasty in comminuted proximal humerus fracture, how much does it matter?

Shoulder hemiarthroplasty is a salvage treatment for comminuted fracture of the humerus especially in elderly patients. Several factors contribute to the final outcome like bone quality and tuberosity reposition. Timing of the surgery is considered one of these factors. This study was done to assess the effect of delaying the surgery up to 2 weeks on the final outcome. This retrospective study was done on 33 patients with four-part fracture of the humerus, divided into two groups, group 1 (17 patients) who had surgery within the first 3 days after trauma, and group 2 (16 patients) who had surgery within the second week after injury. Operations were done by the same surgeon, same technique, and same implant. Constant score was used to assess the final follow-up, and there was a significant better result for group one especially in the items of range of movements and power.     

Intracapsular hip pressures in a porcine model: does position and volume matter?

This study outlines a relationship between joint volume, positioning, and intracapsular pressure in a healthy hip. After measuring the native intracapsular pressure in 12 porcine specimens, each joint was injected with radio-opaque-colored saline as pressures were measured. At 20 mmHg, the hip was placed in its position of ease and then in differing positions while pressures were recorded. Position significantly altered pressures, with the lowest values in neutral and the highest in hyperextension (P<0.001). Extreme hip positions may be detrimental because of high pressures created within the joint, possibly explaining complications associated with some hip diagnostic and treatment methods.     

Trochanteric non-union in revision total hip arthroplasty: does it matter?

The aims of this study were to assess whether trochanteric non-union is an important factor in revision total hip arthroplasty in terms of postoperative morbidity. We studied prospectively 97 consecutive patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty in the years 1992-1996. All operations were performed by one surgeon through a Charnley trans-trochanteric approach. The patients were followed-up over a period of 1-4 years and at 12 months postsurgery were assessed using a modified scoring system devised by D'Aubigne. Anatomical union of the greater trochanter was assessed by an anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph at 12 months to decide if the greater trochanter was united in the correct anatomical position. The trochanteric non-union rate was 18.5% (18 out of 97 patients). There was no significant difference between the patients in terms of pain, function and satisfaction scores at one year between those with trochanteric union and those without. This study suggests that trochanteric non-union post revision total hip arthroplasty is not a cause of increased morbidity.     

Failure of total shoulder arthroplasty: why does it occur?

From a historical perspective, shoulder arthroplasty has evolved significantly from its inception. Much like arthroplasty of the lower extremities, shoulder implant design had its roots in a constrained device. Unfortunately, the inherently high loads that these devices generated across the implant articulation and the glenoid bone interface resulted in an unacceptably high failure rate. Beginning with Neer's original hemiarthroplasty of the 1950s and the more recent implant designs, there has been a strong trend toward less constraint and a greater emphasis on soft tissue preservation in shoulder replacement. In the ideal arthroplasty patient with an intact rotator cuff and a stable, yet degenerative, glenohumeral joint, arthroplasty invariably yields good-to-excellent results 90% of the time. However, owing to the enormous functional range of motion of the joint and its inherent dependence on soft tissues for both stability and motion, there are many areas for potential complications. This article addresses the etiology, recognition, and treatment of these problems.     

Displaced proximal humerus fractures in older patients: reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or nonoperative treatment?

BackgroundReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in older patients has been shown to be an effective treatment modality. Recent studies have questioned the superiority of RTSA over nonoperative treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after RTSA and nonoperative treatment of PHF.MethodsA retrospective case-matched review of 72 displaced PHFs who underwent either RTSA or nonoperative treatment between August 2016 and August 2019 was conducted. Nine RTSA and 6 nonoperative patients were excluded. Thirty-seven RTSAs in 36 patients (1 bilateral) were compared to twenty patients who met operative criteria for RTSA but did not elect to undergo surgery.ResultsMean VAS pain scores decreased significantly in both groups at the final follow-up. Although there was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores at the time of most-recent follow-up between the two cohorts (1.5 RTSA vs. 1.9 nonop, P = .49), patients who underwent RTSA had a more rapid improvement in pain than nonoperative patients. RTSA patients had significantly lower VAS scores at 2 weeks (2.7 ± 3.1 vs. 5.6 ± 3.2, P = .03), 6 weeks (1.7 ± 2.8 vs. 4.1 ± 3.4, P = .02), and 3 months (1.6 ± 2.8 vs. 3.7 ± 3.2, P = .04) postoperatively. RTSA patients also had better forward flexion (125.4 ± 26.4° vs. 92.1 ± 35.1°, P = 0.001) and abduction (87.1 ± 11.6° vs. 75 ± 13.4°, P = .002) than nonoperative patients at the final follow-up (minimum 6 months). There was a statistically significant difference in mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores after RTSA compared with nonoperative patients at the time of final follow-up for acute RTSA and for 3- and 4-part fracture subgroups. Eight patients (21.6%) experienced a complication after RTSA, of which 3 required revision surgery.Discussion/ConclusionOlder patients with displaced PHF have significant improvement in pain and function after both RTSA and nonoperative treatment although RTSA does come with a greater risk of complications. Patients who undergo RTSA have a greater increase in overhead motion and abduction and experience a more rapid improvement in pain, with significantly lower pain scores in the early postoperative period.     

Laparoscopic mechanical fixation devices: does firing angle matter?

Background

A variety of permanent and absorbable tacks are available for mesh fixation during laparoscopic hernia repairs. Although manufacturers recommend deploying tacks perpendicular to the tissue, achieving this can sometimes be challenging. This study aimed to analyze comparatively the effects of angled deployment among commonly used tacks.

Methods

A piece of composite mesh was fixed to the peritoneal surface of a pig with a single tack fired at either a perpendicular (90°) or acute (30°) angle. A lap-shear test was performed to determine fixation strength. Two permanent tacks (a titanium spiral tack: Protack [PT]; and a hollow screw fastener: PermaFix [PF]) and three absorbable tackers (a solid screw: Absorbatack [AT]; a hollow screw fastener: SorbaFix [SF]; and a strap: SecurStrap [SS]) were challenged. A total of 16 samples were performed for each device at each angle. A nonabsorbable transfascial suture was used as a control condition.

Results

Transabdominal sutures had the maximum acute tensile strength (ATS) (29.9 ± 5.5 N). Protack at both 90° and 30° performed significantly better than absorbable tacks (p < 0.01). No significant difference was found among absorbable tacks at 90°. When the same construct was compared at different angles, SS and SF performance was not affected (p = 0.07 and 0.2, respectively). In contrast, PT and AT had significantly reduced fixation strength (p = 0.003 and 0.004, respectively). However, PT fired at an acute angle had fixation equal to that of absorbable tacks fired perpendicularly.

Conclusion

Transabdominal sutures performed better than tacks in the acute setting. No absorbable fixation device demonstrated superior efficacy within its class. Spiral titanium tacks provided better fixation than absorbable tacks at both perpendicular and acute angles. Moreover, titanium spiral tacks deployed at 30° performed equal to or better than absorbable tacks fired perpendicularly to the tissue. It appears that spiral titanium tacks should be strongly considered for cases in which perpendicular tack deployment cannot be achieved.