The impact of luteinizing hormone supplementation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: a retrospective cohort study

The impact of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation to patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on cycle outcomes is controversial. Here, we present a retrospective cohort study including cycles from December 2015 to December 2016. Totally 320 cycles were divided into two groups according to with or without exogenous LH supplementation. No significant differences regarding the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of good-quality embryos, and clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups were found. The logistic regression analysis revealed that LH supplementation was not independently associated with clinical pregnancy rate (OR?=?0.577, 95% CI: 0.272–1.222, p?=?.58) or a biochemical pregnancy rate (OR?=?0.922, 95% CI: 0.444–1.916, p?=?.83). When patients were divided into subgroups based on age, more retrieved oocytes (5.60 vs. 3.97, p?=?.04) and good-quality embryos (3.07 vs. 1.93, p?=?.01) were achieved in cycles with exogenous LH supplementation for 40 years and over group. We conclude that for aged women (40 years old and over), LH supplementation has a positive impact on the number of retrieved oocytes and good-quality embryos in GnRH antagonist cycles.     

改良超长方案中促排卵时不同时期添加高纯度尿促性素对助孕结局的影响

目的 探讨促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)改良超长方案促排卵中高纯度尿促性素(HPhMG)不同添加时机和剂量对助孕结局的影响。方法 回顾性分析本中心首次行体外受精/卵胞质内单精子注射-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)中采用改良超长方案并添加使用了HP-hMG的454例患者的临床资料,根据添加HP-hMG的时机分为全程添加组(A组)和后半期添加组(B组)。A组:Gn启动日血清黄体生成素(LH)1.2 IU/L的患者在重组卵泡刺激素(r-FSH)促排卵的第1日同时添加HP-hMG至hCG注射日;B组:Gn启动日血清LH≥1.2 IU/L的患者r-FSH促排卵的第6日开始添加HP-hMG至hCG注射日。对不同年龄阶段患者(≤35岁和36~40岁)进行分析,观察Gn使用总量和使用时间、hCG注射日激素水平、获卵情况、胚胎质量、着床率、临床妊娠率、活产率、流产率和中重度卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)风险等临床结果。结果 ≤35岁的患者中A组相比B组,虽然Gn使用总量有所增加,但hCG注射日孕酮(P)水平降低,IVF受精率明显增高,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);着床率分别为58.2%和42.4%,临床妊娠率分别为80.1%和61.7%,活产率分别为68.9%和49.5%,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。36~40岁的患者中,A组与B组的临床妊娠率分别为61.9%和26.3%,活产率分别为47.6%和15.8%,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。A、B两组在不同年龄段的流产率和中重度OHSS发生率相似。结论 改良超长方案中患者全程添加HP-hMG较后半期添加能降低hCG注射日P水平,显著提高着床率、临床妊娠率和活产率。     

Advantages of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone over human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination: a randomized clinical trial in unexplained infertility

Objective

To compare two different gonadotropin preparations, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH), combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) in women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Study design

In this prospective clinical trial, couples prepared for IUI cycles were randomly allocated to two groups either to receive CC and hMG (group A, n = 127) or CC and rFSH (group B, n = 132) for ovarian stimulation. Outcomes including rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, OHSS, multiple pregnancy, cancelation, and live birth were compared between groups.

Results

Duration of gonadotropin therapy was significantly shorter in group B (5.1 ± 0.84 vs. 4.7 ± 0.8 days, CI = 95%, P < 0.001). The total dose of administered gonadotropin was also significantly lower in group B (386.9 ± 68.2 vs. 348.2 ± 56.3 IU, CI = 95%, P < 0.001). Dominant follicle number (>17 mm), mean follicular diameter, and endometrial thickness on the day of hCG injection were similar. Clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancies, abortion, live birth, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and cancelation rates were not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusion

IUI cycles in which rFSH had been administered may require shorter duration and a lower total gonadotropin dose.     

Ovulation induction in the new millennium: Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin

The renewed interest in luteinizing hormone (LH), together with limited and decreasing health resources, make essential the comparison of high-cost, recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) preparations (devoid of LH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in terms of clinical efficacy. All published, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rFSH versus hMG under different protocols of stimulation were examined. Eight true RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, recruiting 2031 participants. Data for ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were extracted, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with the use of a fixed-effects model. Data for the meta-analysis were combined using RevMan software (using the Mantel–Haenszel method). Pooling the results of these RCTs showed no significant difference between rFSH and hMG regarding the different outcomes: ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate, OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.93–1.50); clinical pregnancy rate, OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.99–1.47), miscarriage rate, OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.70–2.16); multiple pregnancy rate, OR 1.35 (95% CI 0.96–1.90); incidence of moderate/severe OHSS, OR 1.79 (95% CI 0.74–4.33). However, there was significant reduction in the amount of gonadotropins in favor of hMG over rFSH. There was no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect across the trials. In conclusion, there is no clinically significant difference between hMG and rFSH in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Decision-makers should establish their choice of one drug over the other based on the most up-to-date evidence available.     

Combined gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotropin therapy (GnRH-a/hMG) in normal,high, and poor responders to hMG

Patients who failed to conceive after gonadotropin stimulation in in vitro fertilization treatment were classified into normal, high, or poor responders. They were routinely offered another cycle with a combination of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and gonadotropin therapy (in order to evaluate whether this combined therapy could improve their response). The gonadotropin-induced cycle was compared with the combined therapy cycle. With the combination treatment, in the normal responders the phase of ovarian stimulation was significantly (P<0.001) prolonged, and the number of follicles and oocytes collected (5.7±0.7 vs 3.1±0.4) was increased, without any change in serum estradiol level compared to the control cycle. In high responders the number of oocytes was not modified by the combined treatment compared with the control cycle. However, serum estradiol level was significantly (P<0.005) decreased. The combined therapy did not modify any parameter of response in poor responders. We conclude that the response to combined agonist/gonadotropin therapy is dependent on the patient's own basal response. No improvement in response was expected in poor responders.     

Luteinizing response to human chorionic gonadotropin does not predict outcome in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist-suppressed/human menopausal gonadotropin-stimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine if early luteinizing potential in gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a)-suppressed/human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)-stimulated IVF cycles is predictive of cycle outcome.Design, Patients The study was a prospective evaluation of 41 women beginning a GnRH-a-suppressed/hMG-stimulated IVF cycle.Setting The in vitro fertilization program of a tertiary care institution was the study setting.Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measures were (1) estradiol (E₂) and progesterone (P) levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration and the following day and (2) the ovarian response to ovulation induction and clinical outcome.Results Ten of the 41 women achieved a clinical pregnancy (24.4%). There was no significant difference in progesterone (P) levels on the day of or the day following hCG administration between the pregnant and the nonpregnant groups. Both groups exhibited a significant rise in P level in response to hCG. There was no significant difference in E₂ levels on the day of hCG between the two groups. The serum E₂ did not rise significantly in response to hCG in either group. Patients who became pregnant had significantly more oocytes retrieved, fertilized, cleaved, and transferred.Conclusions Clinical response and outcome in GnRH-a-suppressed/hMG-stimulated IVF cycles are not predicted by early luteinizing potential as indicated by the response of E₂ or P to hCG.Presented at the 7th Annual World Congress of in Vitro Fertilization, Paris, France, June 30–July 3, 1991.     

Comparison of controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone

OBJECTIVE: To carefully examine the features of controlled ovarian stimulation performed with recombinant FSH-alpha or hMG. DESIGN: Controlled, prospective, randomized comparison of fixed gonadotropin regimens. SETTING: Academic research institution. PATIENT(S): Fifty infertile patients who were candidates for IUI. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to receive a fixed regimen of recombinant FSH-alpha (150 IU/day, 25 patients) or hMG (150 IU/day, 25 patients), after GnRH-agonist suppression (long regimen). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily measurements of serum LH, immunoreactive FSH, hCG, E(2), P, and T. Transvaginal pelvic ultrasound every 2 days. Pregnancy and abortion rates. Cost of medications.Two recombinant FSH-alpha-treated patients did not respond. Despite matched daily FSH dose, duration of treatment (hMG 10.8 +/- 0.4 vs. recombinant FSH-alpha 12.4 +/- 0.5 days), gonadotropin dose (21.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 25.3 +/- 1.3 ampoules), gonadotropin cost (288 +/- 10 vs. 1,299 +/- 66 /cycle), serum P levels, and small preovulatory follicle number were significantly lower, and LH, hCG, immunoreactive FSH levels, and larger follicles on day 8 were significantly higher in hMG-treated patients. The pregnancy, abortion, and twin pregnancy rates did not differ. CONCLUSION: The hMG administration was associated with: [1]. increased serum LH activity and immunoreactive FSH levels during treatment; [2]. reduced signs of premature luteinization; [3]. differential modulation of folliculogenesis; [4]. lower treatment duration, gonadotropin dose, and cost; and [5]. clinical outcome comparable to recombinant FSH-alpha.     

Follitropin-alpha versus human menopausal gonadotropin in an in vitro fertilization program

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of recombinant FSH and urinary-derived hMG for ovarian stimulation during IVF. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from IVF cycles conducted over 15 months. SETTING: University hospital IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Three hundred twenty-four women undergoing their first to sixth IVF cycle. INTERVENTION(S): After pituitary down-regulation, patients received recombinant FSH or hMG, according to personal choice. After hCG administration, patients underwent oocyte retrieval, oocyte fertilization, and embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rate and clinical ongoing pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval. RESULT(S): Patients who chose recombinant FSH were slightly younger than those who chose hMG (34.1 vs. 35.1 years, respectively). Although more embryos were transferred in the hMG group (3.6 vs. 3.2), the ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in the recombinant FSH group (ongoing pregnancy rate, 50.0% vs. 36.2%). CONCLUSION(S): Recombinant FSH is more effective than hMG for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles. This increased efficacy, which is achieved with fewer ampoules, is likely to offset the higher acquisition costs of recombinant FSH.     

The day of initiation of human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation affects follicular growth in in vitro fertilization cycles

The attainment of synchronous follicular development in human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin-stimulated cycles for in vitro fertilization (IVF) continues to be a perplexing problem. Two regimens of follicle stimulation for IVF cycles were, therefore, compared. Twenty-nine patients commenced human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) therapy on day I of the menstrual cycle (Group I), while 30 women received hMG from the third day of the cycle (Group II). The hMG therapy was tailored to the individual patients's response, based on ultrasonographic measurements of follicular size and serum estradiol (E₂) levels. Both groups of patients received a mean of 19.6±1.4 ampules of hMG over a mean of 6.1±0.2 days. The pattern of serum E₂ and progesterone levels in the periovulatory and luteal phase was not affected by the day of initiation of hMG therapy, although Group I patients demonstrated lower (P<0.05) E₂ levels on the 2 days prior to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. In terms of follicle growth, Group II follicles consistently demonstrated a significantly (P<0.01,x ² test) larger proportion of medium- and large-sized follicles compared to Group I follicles on almost all of the days when ultrasonographic measurements were taken. In addition. Group II follicles demonstrated an earlier shift (day—1) to the larger follicles than Group I follicles (day 0). Significantly (P<0.001) more oocytes were recovered per uspirated follicle in Group II patients, but the fertilization rate per oocyte was greater (P<0.003) for Group I oocytes. Nevertheless, pregnancy rates did not differ between the two groups. It is suggested that a difference between the two groups of patients in the quantity or quality of gonadotropin receptor sites in the early part of the follicular phase may account for both the diminished E₂ production in the follicular phase and the persistent depressed follicular growth in Group I patients.     

Comparison of human menopausal gonadotropin administered once and twice daily in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program

This is a retrospective study which evaluates the use of twice-daily (BID) human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) for follicular stimulation in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) program from February to June 1985 and compares it to daily (QD) hMG from August to December 1984. All QD patients were begun on 2 ampoules of hMG, and BID patients on 2 ampoules twice daily. Individual patient responses to hMG determined subsequent doses so as to achieve continuously rising estradiol levels. The BID stimulation scheme appears to increase statistically characteristics that would be present in the ideal stimulated cycle such as elevated follicularphase estradiol (E₂) (2125 pg/ml for the BID vs 1581 pg/ml for the QD group) with an increase in the number of patients achieving the desired Jones pattern, increased oocyte retrieval (4.01 vs 2.45), and an increase in the number of transferred concepti (2.69 vs 1.87). No statistical differences were noted in the number of endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surges or mean LH. The luteal phase does not appear to have been altered by the frequency of administration. Although the increase in the total (20.0 vs 14.5%) and live-born/ongoing (16.9 vs 11.8%) pregnancy rate per laparoscopy with the BID regimen is not statistically significant, it may be that it is clinically relevant.     

Pregnancy outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles with serum estradiol drop prior to human chorionic gonadotropin.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of an unpredictable drop in serum estradiol prior to hCG administration on pregnancy outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles. METHODS: 3653 consecutive IVF cycles from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2000 at Brigham and Women's Hospital were reviewed, and 65 cycles in which oocyte retrieval (ER) was performed following a drop in serum estradiol (E(2)) not associated with intentional withdrawal of gonadotropins were identified. Daily gonadotropin dose was decreased at some time in 25 of these cycles, while the remaining 40 cycles did not have a reduction in gonadotropin dose. A retrospective case-control study of the respective live birth rates and pregnancy loss rates of patients with unpredictable E(2) drops in the 65 study cycles were compared to 65 age matched controls. RESULTS: Live birth rates (32% vs. 35%, p=0.72) and pregnancy loss rates (28% vs. 30%, p=0.76) were similar for all study and control groups respectively. There were no differences in live birth and pregnancy loss rates in cycles undergoing gonadotropin dose reduction (40% vs. 44%, p=0.78 and 29% vs. 39%, p=0.70) and cycles without gonadotropin dose reduction (28% vs. 30%, p=0.81 and 27% vs. 20%, p=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of coasting, a drop in serum estradiol levels during GnRH-agonist downregulated controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF prior to hCG is not associated with a decrease in live birth rates or pregnancy loss rates.     

The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in a flexible protocol: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a flexible protocol of starting gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist according to the size of the leading follicle. STUDY DESIGN: This was a pilot study that included 123 couples who were undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles at the Egyptian IVF-ET Center. Couples were recruited into two groups: group I (n=64), gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist was administered when the diameter of the leading follicle reached 16 mm; group II (n=59), gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist was administered on day 6 of stimulation. RESULTS: The mean number of antagonist injections was significantly lower in the flexible protocol compared to the fixed protocol (3.4+/-1.1 vs 5.3+/-1.8, P<.05). There was no significant difference between the two protocols regarding the number of embryos, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.45-1.59) or multiple pregnancy rate (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.45-3.51). CONCLUSION: Starting the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist according to the size of the leading follicle is as effective as starting on a fixed day and reduces the antagonist administration.     

Treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist: a pilot study

Objective: This novel study describes an effective outpatient treatment for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) that results in rapid normalization of symptoms. Study design: A total of twenty-seven infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technique with early-onset OHSS were enrolled in this non-randomized clinical trial in an academic infertility center. In all patients, after complete desensitization with long-term protocol ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins was commenced. Final oocyte maturation was triggered with human chorionic gonadotrophin. Oocytes were collected 36–38 h later using transvaginal-guided follicle aspiration under general anaesthesia. All embryos were frozen and study group patients received two consecutive doses of GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide) and the control group received daily dose of cabergoline for a week. Results: The research revealed that moderate and severe OHSS, hospitalization or acute care for OHSS and ascites tap were significantly lower in the antagonist (Cetrotide) group. The Patients’ satisfaction with Cetrotide was noticeable. No side effect was reported in either group. Conclusion: GnRH antagonists seem to be an effective outpatient treatment with rapid onset activity and minimal side effects for the management of early OHSS.     

The decrease of serum luteinizing hormone level by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist following the mild IVF stimulation protocol for IVF and its clinical outcome

Purpose While performing the mild ovarian stimulation protocol with a GnRH antagonist, the pregnancy rate was compared between the groups, which were divided by the degree that the luteinizing hormone (LH) level decreased. Materials and methods Patients aged 27 to 42years (36.1 ± 3.79) underwent 308 IVF cycles who opted for IVF via the mild ovarian stimulation protocol began clomiphene citrate on day 3 and recombinant FSH on day 5. A GnRH antagonist was administered when the dominant follicle reached 14mm. Serum LH was measured at the time of GnRH antagonist administration and at the time of hCG injection. The pregnancy rate and implantation rate were compared between 50 cycles in which the LH level dropped less than one-third and the control (LH level within 1/3). Result(s) The pregnancy rate for the group in which the LH level fell less than one third was 18%. Conversely, the pregnancy rate for the control group was 39%. The implantation rate was 18% for the less than one-third group and 26% for the control group. Both the pregnancy rate and the implantation rate for the group in which the LH level fell less than one-third were significantly lower than that of control (p < 0.02). Conslusion(s) When performing the mild ovarian stimulation protocol, serum LH should be followed. If the serum LH level is less than one-third at the time of hCG injection, both the pregnancy rate and implantation rate are significantly lower. Capsule If the serum LH level is less than one-third at the time of hCG injection, both the pregnancy rate and implantation rate are significantly lower following the Mild IVF stimulation protocol.     

黄体期促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂在防治卵巢过度刺激综合征的应用进展

卵巢过度刺激综合征(ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome,OHSS)是辅助生殖技术(ART)相关的并发症,是以卵巢体积增大、毛细血管通透性增加、体液外渗为特征的一个系统性综合征。目前已知许多可预测OHSS发生的高危因素并给予预防措施,但因其病因尚未明确,临床表现形式多样,给临床干预和治疗带来了不少困难。近年来有文献报道,ART取卵后黄体期应用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist,Gn RH-A)能预防和治疗OHSS。本文将综述黄体期应用G n R H-A在防治O H S S的作用。