Risk Factors Associated with Clinical Failure of Uterine Artery Embolization for Postpartum Hemorrhage

PurposeTo identify risk factors for clinical failure of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), with particular attention to the uterine artery diameter.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent UAE for PPH between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2021. Technical success was defined as the completion of embolization of the arteries thought to be the cause of the bleeding. Clinical success was defined as no recurrent bleeding or need for additional therapeutic interventions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the risk factors associated with clinical failure of UAE.ResultsOf the 47 patients, 6 had recurrent bleeding. Of the 6 patients, 4 underwent hysterectomy, and 2 underwent repeat embolization. The clinical success rate was 87.2% (41/47), with no major adverse events such as uterine infarction or death. In univariate analysis, there were slight differences in multiparity (P = .115) and placental abruption (P = .128) and a significant difference in the findings of a narrow uterine artery on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (P = .005). In multivariate analysis, only a narrow uterine artery on DSA was a significant factor (odds ratio, 18.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–134.8; P = .004).ConclusionsA narrow uterine artery on DSA was a risk factor for clinically unsuccessful UAE for PPH. It may be prudent to conclude the procedure only after it is ensured that vasospasm has been relieved.     

Imaging-Guided De Novo Retrograde Ureteral Access and Stent Placement without Cystoscopy in Women

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of a new technique for imaging-guided de novo retrograde ureteral double J (DJ) stent placement without cystoscopy in women.Materials and MethodsEighty-four women referred for ureteral stent placement between April 2019 and January 2022 were included. In all the patients, the initial attempt for stent placement was performed in a retrograde fashion. Successful ureteral catheterization and DJ stent placement were considered as technical success. The fluoroscopy time required to catheterize the ureter and that for the entire procedure were recorded. Factors affecting the technical success rate and fluoroscopy time were examined.ResultsA total of 108 ureteral stent placement procedures in 84 women, with a mean age of 57.5 years (range, 19–85 years), were performed. The most common underlying pathologies were cervical (n = 33, 31%) and ovarian (n = 32, 30%) carcinomas. The most commonly involved segments of the ureter were the lower half (n = 44, 40%) and trigone (n = 39, 36%). The technical success rate was 81.5%, and it reached 93% in the case of lower-half ureteral obstruction. Distorted trigonal anatomy caused by external compression of the bladder wall by a mass was associated with a higher rate of technical failure (90.6% vs 47.8%; P < .001). The use of ultrasound guidance to guide the sheath to the ureteral orifice allowed for a significant decrease in the fluoroscopy time for ureteral catheterization (4.6 minutes ± 3.91 vs 2.26 minutes ± 2.32; P = .003) and that for the entire procedure (9.42 minutes ± 4.95 vs 5.93 minutes ± 4.06; P = .001).ConclusionsImaging-guided de novo retrograde ureteral catheterization and stent placement can be successfully performed in a high percentage of patients within a reasonable fluoroscopy time without the need for cystoscopy in women.     

Single-Use versus Reusable Endoscopes for Percutaneous Biliary Endoscopy with Lithotripsy: Technical Metrics,Clinical Outcomes,and Cost Comparison

PurposeTo compare procedure and fluoroscopy time, technical and clinical success, and costs between single-use and reusable endoscopes in patients undergoing percutaneous biliary endoscopy (PBE) with lithotripsy.Material and MethodsThirty-four patients (67 procedures) were retrospectively included in the study. The patients were treated with PBE for gallstone removal from October 24, 2014, to February 12, 2020, using reusable (28 procedures) or single-use (39 procedures) endoscopes. The procedure time, fluoroscopy time, technical success rate (accessing the biliary system and locating the gallstone), clinical success rate (at least partial gallstone removal), complication rate, and cost of use were compared between the procedures.ResultsThe mean (± standard deviation) procedure time was not significantly different between single-use (136 minutes ± 45) and reusable endoscopes (136 minutes ± 51) (P = .47). The mean fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter for single-use endoscopes (11 minutes ± 8.4) than for reusable endoscopes (18 minutes ± 12) (P = .01). When comparing single-use versus reusable endoscopes, the technical success (95% [n = 37] vs 93% [n = 26]) and the clinical success (90% [n = 35] vs 75% [n = 21]) rates were not significantly different (both, P > .05). Only 1 complication was noted in the reusable endoscope group (P = .42). The cost per case was lower for single-use ($1,500) than for reusable ($3,987) endoscope procedures, primarily due to differences in capital costs and repair costs.ConclusionsSingle-use endoscopes offer the potential for lower patient radiation exposure and lower cost per case, which may reduce the financial barriers to offering PBE in interventional radiology practices. The clinical and technical success rates did not differ by endoscope type.     

Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Transradial,Transbrachial, and Transfemoral Approach for Mesenteric Arterial Procedures

PurposeTo assess feasibility and safety of transradial access (TRA) compared with transfemoral access (TFA) and transbrachial access (TBA) for mesenteric arterial endovascular procedures.Materials and MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent a mesenteric arterial procedure in a tertiary referral center between May 2012 and February 2018. Exclusion criteria were absence of data and lost to follow-up within 24 hours after the procedure. During the study period, 103 patients underwent 148 mesenteric arterial procedures (TBA, n = 52; TFA, n = 39; TRA, n = 57). Mean patient age was 64.3 years ± 13.3, and 91 patients (62%) were women. Primary outcomes were vascular access specified technical success rate and access site complication rate, as reported in hospital records.ResultsTechnical success rate specified for the vascular access technique did not differ between the 3 approaches (TBA 96%, TFA 87%, TRA 91%; TRA vs TBA, P = .295; TBA vs TFA, P = .112; TRA vs TFA, P = .524), and overall access site complication rate was not different between the 3 approaches (TBA 42%, TFA 23%, TRA 35%; TRA vs TBA, P = .439; TBA vs TFA, P = .055; TRA vs TFA, P = .208). However, more major access site complications were reported for TBA than for TRA or TFA (TBA 17%, TFA 3%, TRA 2%; TRA vs TBA, P = .005; TBA vs TFA, P = .026; TRA vs TFA, P = .785).ConclusionsTRA is a safe and feasible approach for mesenteric arterial procedures comparable to TFA, but with a significantly lower major access site complication rate than TBA.     

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Benign Chronic Inflammatory Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory joint pain via systematic review and meta-analysis.Materials and MethodsMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain treated with TAE. Meta-analyses of pain score changes, changes in proportions of patients on analgesic medications, range of motion changes, technical success rates, and adverse events rates were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to pain site (knee versus shoulder).ResultsFourteen observational studies, which included 346 patients, were reviewed. The pooled technical success rate was 95.8%, and no major adverse events were observed. The pooled mean difference in pain score at 1 week was 3.1. At 1, 3, and 6 months, the difference in score was 4.0, 4.2, and 5.1, respectively. At 1 year, the difference was 5.5. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that shoulder embolization was associated with greater reduction of pain than knee embolization at 3 and 6 months (P < .001 and P = .018, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference between the sites at 1 month (P = .734). The pooled proportions of patients on analgesic medication at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 81.1%, 36.3%, 42.3%, 28.2%, and 22.4%, respectively. The pooled estimated increase in the range of motion among patients who underwent shoulder embolization was 55.6° for anterior elevation and 64.7° for abduction.ConclusionsTAE is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain.     

Evaluation of Technical Success,Efficacy, and Safety of Portomesenteric Venous Intervention following Nontransplant Hepatobiliary or Pancreatic Surgery

PurposeTo evaluate technical success, efficacy and safety of portomesenteric venous (PMV) intervention for PMV stenosis or occlusion following nontransplant hepatobiliary or pancreatic (HPB) surgery.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review identified 42 patients (mean age 60 y) with PMV stenosis (n = 33; 79%) or occlusion (n = 9; 21%) who underwent attempted PMV intervention following HPB surgery between June 1, 2011, and April 1, 2018. Main outcomes were technical success, primary patency rates, and complications. Technical success was compared by venous pathology and primary PMV patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure using Fisher exact test. Rates of primary patency by stent group were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsTechnical success was 91% (n = 38/42) and significantly higher in patients with stenosis (n = 33/33; 100%) vs occlusion (n = 5/9; 56%) (P = .001). Primary presenting symptom resolved in 28 (87%) patients, including 6 (100%) patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. At mean imaging follow-up of 8.6 months ± 8.8, primary stent patency was 76%. There was no significant difference in primary stent patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure (P = .48). There were 2 (4.8%) periprocedural complications.ConclusionsPortomesenteric venoplasty and stent placement following nontransplant HPB surgery is safe with a high rate of technical success if performed before chronic occlusion.     

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Transarterial Embolization for High-Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease

The present systematic review determined the role of transarterial embolization (TAE) as a prophylactic treatment in bleeding peptic ulcers after initial successful endoscopic hemostasis. PubMed and Ovid Medline databases were searched from inception until July 2019 for studies that included patients deemed high-risk based on Forrest Classification, Rockall score ≥ 5, or endoscopic evaluation in addition to those who underwent prophylactic TAE after initial successful endoscopic hemostasis. Meta-analysis was performed to compare patients who underwent endoscopic therapy (ET) and TAE with those who underwent ET alone. The primary outcomes measured included rates of rebleeding, reintervention, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures evaluated length of hospitalization, technical success rates, and complications associated with TAE. Of 916 publications, 5 were eligible for inclusion; 310 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding underwent prophylactic TAE, and 255 were compared against a control group of 580 patients that underwent standard treatment with ET alone. Patients who underwent ET with TAE had lower 30-day rebleeding rates (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15–0.85; P = .02; I² = 50%). The ET with TAE group had a lower 30-day mortality rate (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10–0.83; P = .02; I² = 58%). There was no difference in pooled reintervention rates (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43–1.08; P = .10; I² = 0%) and length of hospitalization (mean difference, ?0.32; 95% CI, ?1.88 to 1.24; P = .69; I² = 0%). Technical success rate of prophylactic TAE was 90.5% (95% CI, 83.09–97.98; I² = 75.9%). Pooled proportion of overall complication rate was 0.18% (95% CI, 0.00–1.28; I² = 0%). Prophylactic TAE has lower rebleeding and mortality with a good success rate and low complications. Prophylactic TAE after primary ET may be recommended for selected patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers; however, further studies should be performed to establish this as a routine tool in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer disease.     

Clinical Outcomes of Transarterial Embolization for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy Refractory to Conservative Treatment: A Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transarterial embolization (TAE) for chronic Achilles tendinopathy (AT) refractory to conservative treatment.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 20 patients (12 men and 8 women; mean age, 30.3 years) who received TAE using imipenem/cilastatin sodium for refractory chronic AT from May 2019 to April 2021. Nine patients had bilateral involvement. A total of 29 procedures were performed (8 for nonathletes and 21 for athletes). If feasible, embolization was performed superselectively of the arterial branch demonstrating hypervascularity, early venous drainage, and/or supplying the pain site noted using a radiopaque marker. The visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10) score was used to assess pain symptoms at baseline and during the follow-up period (1 day; 1 week; 1, 3, and 6 months; and open period). Clinical success was defined as a decrease of >50% in the VAS score at 6 months when compared with baseline.ResultsIn 25 (86.2%) of 29 procedures, clinical success was achieved. Significant decreases in the VAS scores were noted at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (6.86 at the baseline vs 3.48, 3.41, 3.10, 2.55, and 1.62, respectively; all P < .01). For patients available for the 12- and 24-month follow-ups (n = 19 and 6, respectively), the mean VAS scores significantly decreased (6.84 vs 2.00 and 7.33 vs 1.17, respectively; all P < .01). No serious adverse events were observed during follow-up.ConclusionsTAE may alleviate pain for patients with chronic AT refractory to the conservative treatment with a low risk of adverse events.     

Transarterial Embolization of Neovascularity for Refractory Nighttime Shoulder Pain: A Multicenter,Open-Label,Feasibility Trial

PurposeTo assess the feasibility of transarterial embolization (TAE) for recalcitrant nighttime shoulder pain in a multicentric study.Materials and MethodsThis prospective, open-label, feasibility trial included 100 patients treated at 5 institutions. TAE was performed in 76 patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) and 24 patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears (sRCTs). The ipsilateral radial artery was punctured, and imipenem/cilastatin sodium was infused as an embolic agent. Adverse events, 10 point pain numerical rating scale (NRS), range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint, and quality of life (via the EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D]) were evaluated.ResultsAll patients exhibited neovascularity on baseline angiography, and all TAE procedures were performed successfully. No patient experienced a major adverse event. The mean nighttime pain NRS scores at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after TAE were 6.4 ± 2.2, 3.4 ± 2.6, 2.3 ± 2.5, and 1.6 ± 2.2, respectively (for all, P < .001). The mean ROM of anterior elevation at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after TAE were 97° ± 29°, 119° ± 28°, 135° ± 27°, and 151° ± 17°, respectively (for all, P < .001). The mean EQ-5D scores at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after TAE were 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.73 ± 0.16, 0.80 ± 0.17, and 0.84 ± 0.17, respectively (for all, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the clinical success rate between the AC and sRCT groups.ConclusionsTAE for nighttime shoulder pain caused by AC and sRCTs was feasible with sufficient safety and efficacy.     

Evaluation of the Benefit of Extended Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis with Serial Angiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

PurposeTo evaluate whether extended catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with repeat visits to the angiography suite provide added benefit in treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective review of CDT procedures performed for acute PE in 156 patients (age 56.1 y ± 15.3, 46.2% women) between 2009 and 2019. All patients underwent at least 1 follow-up visit to the angiography suite for evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and thrombus burden (Miller score) before termination (111/156, 71.2%) or continuation of CDT (45/156, 28.8%).ResultsPatients who had CDT extended beyond the first follow-up visit required a higher total dose of tissue plasminogen activator (40.7 mg ± 14.3 vs 22.6 mg ± 9.9, P < .001) to achieve a similar final Miller score (6.4 ± 3.8 vs 7.6 ± 3.9, P = .1) and a similar reduction in systolic PAP (?14.4 mm Hg ± 10.2 vs ?12.6 mm Hg ± 11.9, P = .6). The initial Miller scores were similar in both groups (19.7 ± 5.8 vs 19 ± 4, P = .4) but were significantly higher during the first follow-up visit (after 18 hours ± 5.5 vs 20 hours ± 4.8, P = .06) in patients requiring multiple follow-up visits (12.2 ± 5 vs 7.6 ± 3.9, P < .001). Multiple regression analyses identified heart rate > 100 beats/min and systolic PAP > 55 mm Hg as associated with the need for extended CDT. Extended CDT did not result in a higher hemorrhagic complication rate (1/45 vs 6/111, P = .7).ConclusionsPatients presenting with higher heart rates and systolic PAP may benefit from extended CDT to achieve similar reductions in PAP and thrombus burden, without clear added risk of hemorrhage.     

Repeat Prostatic Artery Embolization for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeat prostatic artery (PA) embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2018 in 108 patients with symptomatic BPH treated with repeat PAE: group A (n = 39; 36.1%) were patients who never showed a response to PAE, and group B (n = 69; 63.9%) were patients who had clinical improvement in the first 6 months following PAE but relapsing symptoms afterward. The main patterns of revascularization were 75% from the previously embolized PA and 25% from collateral vessels (superior vesical, posterior-lateral PA, penile branches). Technical outcomes and adverse events were registered. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), and clinical success were compared between groups.ResultsMedian follow-up was 18 months (range, 1–36 mo); median interval between PAE and repeat PAE was 420 days (range, 77–2,240 d). Mean procedural time was significantly longer for repeat PAE vs initial PAE (81.1 min vs 67.4 min; P = .0007). There were no major complications and no urinary incontinence. Mean IPSS/QOL improvements were greater in group B vs group A: 9.51 vs 6.13 and 1.30 vs 0.56, respectively (P < .001). The cumulative probability of clinical success after repeat PAE was higher in group B than in group A (P = .0001): 84.1% vs 46.2% at 1 month, 56.7% vs 28.2% at 12 months, and 51.9% vs 16.9% at 24–36 months.ConclusionsRepeat PAE is safe and effective for recurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by BPH but has limited impact in patients who did not show a response to initial PAE.     

Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Bleomycin-Eluting versus Bland Microspheres in a Canine Model

PurposeTo prospectively assess safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with bleomycin-eluting microspheres for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a canine model.Materials and MethodsTwelve adult male beagles (mean age, 1.6 y ± 0.2; range, 1.2–2.0 y) were randomly assigned to group A (n = 6; PAE with bleomycin-eluting 30–60-μm HepaSphere microspheres) and group B (n = 6; PAE with bland 30–60-μm HepaSphere microspheres) between April 2017 and November 2018. Plasma bleomycin concentration in group A was measured within 7 days. Prostate volume (PV) and ischemic volume after PAE were measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Prostates and adjacent organs were harvested after the last magnetic resonance study and histopathologically examined.ResultsPlasma bleomycin concentration peaked at 10 minutes at 2,055.0 ng/mL ± 606.1 and lasted for 1,440 min at low levels after PAE. PV reduction percentage was greater in group A than in group B at 1 month (74.1% ± 4.3 vs 63.7% ± 3.5; P = .006) and 3 months (61.5% ± 6.7 vs 46.1% ± 3.8; P = .001) after PAE. Proportion of prostate ischemic volume was greater in group A than in group B (75.3% ± 3.0 vs 62.0% ± 7.1; P = .006) at 1 month after PAE. Proportion of prostate ischemic volume at 1 month positively correlated with PV percentage reduction at 3 months in group A (r = 0.840, P = .036) and group B (r = 0.844, P = .035). There were no complications or nontarget embolization to surrounding organs after the procedures.ConclusionsIn a canine model, PAE with bleomycin-eluting microspheres was feasible and well tolerated and caused ischemic necrosis and reduction in PV.     

Safety and Efficacy of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access: A randomized trial Comparing with Angioplasty Alone

PurposeTo assess whether angioplasty of hemodialysis access (HA) stenosis with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) would prevent restenosis in comparison with plain-balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).Materials and MethodsThis prospective randomized clinical trial enrolled 120 patients with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae (n = 109) and grafts (n = 11), due to a ≥50% stenosis between March 2014 and April 2018. All patients underwent high-pressure balloon angioplasty and were then randomized to either DCB (n = 60) or PTA (n = 60). Patients were followed-up for 1 year, and angiography was performed 6 months after angioplasty. The primary endpoint was the late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included other angiographic parameters at 6 months and HA failures, adverse event, and mortality at 12 months. Continuous variables were compared with a Student t-test, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for freedom from HA failure and for mortality.ResultsLLL in the DCB and in the PTA group were 0.64 mm ± 1.20 and 1.13 mm ± 1.51, respectively (P = .082, adjusted P = .0498). DCB was associated with lower percentage stenosis (54.2% ± 19.3 vs 61.7% ± 18.2; P = .047) and binary restenosis ≥50% (56.5% vs 81.1%; P = .009) than PTA. The number of HA failures after 12 months was lower for DCB than for PTA (45% vs 66.7%; P = .017). Mortality at 12 months was 10% and 8.3% in the DCB and PTA groups, respectively (P = .75).ConclusionsDespite LLL improvement that failed to reach statistical significance, this study demonstrated decreased incidence and severity of restenosis with DCB compared with PTA to treat dysfunctional HA.     

Endovascular Revascularization as Primary Treatment for Acute Embolic Mesenteric Ischemia: Stent Thrombectomy plus Aspiration versus Aspiration Alone

PurposeTo investigate the outcomes of stent thrombectomy combined with aspiration versus aspiration alone in acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).Materials and MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Between May 1, 2012, and January 1, 2021, 41 patients (mean age, 73.8 years ± 7.9) with AMI who underwent stent thrombectomy plus aspiration (Group 1, n = 14) or aspiration alone (Group 2, n = 27) were included. The treatment regimens and clinical and follow-up outcomes of the patients were reviewed and analyzed. Group differences were compared using a χ² test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or Mann-Whitney U test. The cumulative survival rate was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier curve.ResultsThe overall clinical success rate was 78.0% (32/41), and no significant differences were found between Group 1 and Group 2 (78.6% vs 77.8%, P = 1.00). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 was associated with a higher complete clearance rate (44.4% vs 78.6%, P = .04), less adjunctive local thrombolysis (48.1% vs 14.3%, P = .03), and a shorter length of hospital stay (10.7 days ± 9.0 vs 5.7 days ± 4.7, P = .03). The estimated survival rates at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 73.2%, 72.5%, 71.4%, 65.3%, and 59.8%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the survival rate between the groups (log-rank test, P = .96). The recurrence rates for Group 1 and Group 2 were 8.3% (1/12) and 4.0% (1/25), respectively.ConclusionsCompared with aspiration alone, aspiration combined with stent thrombectomy showed a higher complete clearance rate, reduced adjunctive thrombolysis, and a shorter length of hospital stay.     

The Lutonix AV Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis: 2-Year Results and Subgroup Analysis

PurposeTo present final, 2-year results of a randomized trial comparing paclitaxel-coated vs uncoated balloon angioplasty following vessel preparation with ultra–high-pressure percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs).Materials and MethodsTwenty-three sites enrolled 285 subjects with dysfunctional AVFs located in the arm. Before 1:1 randomization, successful vessel preparation was achieved (full waist effacement, < 30% residual stenosis). Follow-up was clinically driven except for a 6-month office visit.ResultsNinety-six of 141 subjects in the drug-coated balloon (DCB) arm and 111 of 144 in the control arm completed the study. Target lesion primary patency (TLPP) rates for the DCB and control groups were 58% ± 4 vs 46% ± 4 (P = .02) at 9 months, 44% ± 5 vs 36% ± 4 (P = .04) at 12 months, 34% ± 5 vs 28% ± 4 (P = .06) at 18 months, and 27% ± 4 vs 24% ± 4 (P = .09) at 24 months, respectively. Mean time to TLPP event for subjects with an event was longer for DCBs (322 vs 207 d; P < .0001). Fewer interventions were needed to maintain target lesion patency in the DCB group at 9 months (P = .02) but not at 12 (P = .08), 18 (P = .13), or 24 months (P = .19). The noninferiority safety target was met at all intervals (P < .01). Mortality did not differ between groups (P = .27). Post hoc analyses showed equivalent DCB effect in all subgroups.ConclusionsTwo-year results demonstrate long-term safety and variable efficacy of DCB angioplasty in AVFs.     

Preoperative Transarterial Embolization of Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma Using n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate: Case-Control Comparison with Microspheres

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial embolization (TAE) with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (nBCA) for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA).Materials and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on patients with JNA who underwent TAE and endoscopic resection between 2020 and 2022. Patients embolized with nBCA were identified, and those embolized with microspheres were set as the control group. Data on demographics, symptoms, tumor characteristics, blood loss, adverse events, residual disease, and recurrence were collected, and case-control analysis was performed for the 2 groups. Differences in characteristics between the groups were tested using the Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to analyze the univariate and multivariate influences on blood loss.ResultsTwenty patients were included in this study: 13 in the microsphere group and 7 in the nBCA group. The median blood loss was 400 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 200–520 mL) in the nBCA group and 1,000 mL (IQR, 500–1,000 mL) in the microsphere group (P = .028). The GLM confirmed lower blood loss in the nBCA group (relative risk, 0.58 [0.41–0.83]; P = .01). A residual tumor was found in 1 patient in each group (7.7% vs 14.3%; P = 1.000). Recurrence was not observed in any patient. None of the patients experienced adverse events during embolization.ConclusionsTAE of advanced JNA with nBCA glue is safe and effective and can significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss compared with microspheres.     

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block for Adjunctive Analgesia during Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis

PurposeTo determine whether hepatic hilar nerve block techniques reduce analgesic and sedation requirements during percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of hepatic tumors.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort analysis was performed of 177 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 33–86 years) who underwent percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors. All patients were treated utilizing local anesthetic and moderate sedation between November 2018 and November 2021 at a tertiary level hospital, with or without the administration of a hepatic hilar nerve block. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the administration of the hilar nerve block and fentanyl and midazolam dosages.ResultsA total of 114 (64%) patients received a hilar nerve block in addition to procedural sedation, and 63 (36%) patients received procedural sedation alone. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic and tumor characteristics between the cohorts. The procedure duration was longer in the hilar block cohort than in the unblocked cohort (median, 95 vs 82 minutes; P = .0012). The technical success rate (98% in both the cohorts, P = .93) and adverse event rate (11% vs 3%, P = .14) were not significantly different between the cohorts. After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, ablation modality, and procedure and ablation durations, hilar nerve blocks were associated with lower fentanyl (?18.4%, P = .0045) and midazolam (?22.7%, P = .0007) dosages.ConclusionsHepatic hilar nerve blocks significantly decrease the fentanyl and midazolam requirements during thermal ablation of hepatic tumors, without a significant change in the technical success or adverse event rates.     

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Biliary Endoscopy: A 7-Year Single-Institution Experience

PurposeTo evaluate safety and effectiveness of percutaneous biliary endoscopy (PBE) performed on patients ineligible for surgery or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review was conducted for all patients who underwent PBE at a single academic institution between June 2013 and February 2020; 39 patients underwent 58 choledochoscopy sessions, and 21 patients underwent 48 cholecystoscopy sessions. Choledochoscopy indications included stone removal (23 of 39 patients) or biliary stenosis evaluation (19 of 39 patients). Cholecystoscopy indications included calculous cholecystitis (18 of 21 patients) and symptomatic cholelithiasis (3 of 21 patients). Technical success, procedural and fluoroscopy times, and tube-free survival were assessed.ResultsFor all PBEs performed for stone clearance, using disposable endoscopes led to shorter mean ± SD procedural (128.7 minutes ± 56.2 vs 240.2 minutes ± 184.6; P < .01) and fluoroscopy times (10.7 minutes ± 7.9 vs 16.5 minutes ± 12.0; P = .01) than using reusable endoscopes. Increasing institutional experience was associated with reduced procedural time (β = −56.73; P < .001). Choledochoscopy technical success was 94.8% with 1 adverse event of bile duct perforation with bile leak requiring drainage. For patients with choledocholithiasis, biliary drains were removed in 14 (60.9%) patients, with a mean tube-free survival of 22.1 months ± 23.8. For cholecystoscopy, technical success was 93.8% with no adverse events. Cholecystostomy tubes were removed in 15 (71.4%) patients, with a mean tube-free survival of 7.5 months ± 8.8.ConclusionsThis study supports PBE as a safe and feasible option for nonsurgical patients or those with altered anatomy precluding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Moreover, PBE may result in tube-free survival.     

Utilization and Comparative Effectiveness of Uterine Artery Embolization versus Hysterectomy for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage: A National Inpatient Sample Study

PurposeTo identify differences in mortality or length of hospital stay for mothers treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) or hysterectomy for severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), as well as to analyze whether geographic or clinical determinants affected the type of therapy received.Materials and MethodsThis National Inpatient Sample study from 2005 to 2017 included all patients with live-birth deliveries. Severe PPH was defined as PPH that required transfusion, hysterectomy, or UAE. Propensity score weighting–adjusted demographic, maternal, and delivery risk factors were used to assess mortality and prolonged hospital stay.ResultsOf 9.8 million identified live births, PPH occurred in 31.0 per 1,000 cases. The most common intervention for PPH was transfusion (116.4 per 1,000 cases of PPH). Hysterectomy was used more frequently than UAE (20.4 vs 12.9 per 1,000 cases). The following factors predicted that hysterectomy would be used more commonly than UAE: previous cesarean delivery, breech fetal position, placenta previa, transient hypertension during pregnancy without pre-eclampsia, pre-existing hypertension without pre-eclampsia, pre-existing hypertension with pre-eclampsia, unspecified maternal hypertension, and gestational diabetes (all P < .001). Delivery risk factors associated with greater utilization of hysterectomy over UAE included postterm pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, cervical laceration, forceps vaginal delivery, and shock (all P < .001). There was no difference in mortality between hysterectomy and UAE. After balancing demographic, maternal, and delivery risk factors, the odds of prolonged hospital stay were 0.38 times lower with UAE than hysterectomy (P < .001).ConclusionsDespite similar mortality and shorter hospital stays, UAE is used far less than hysterectomy in the management of severe PPH.     

Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonmaturing Fistulae for Hemodialysis Access via Transradial Approach: A Case-Control Study

PurposeTo compare outcomes of transradial access for endovascular treatment of nonmaturing hemodialysis fistulae compared to brachial arteriography followed by unidirectional or bidirectional fistula access for intervention.Materials and MethodsIn this institutional review board-approved, retrospective, case-control study, 56 consecutive patients with nonmaturing arteriovenous fistulae underwent percutaneous intervention between 2015 and 2018. The transradial group (n = 28) underwent radial artery access for diagnostic fistulography and intervention. The control group (n = 28) underwent retrograde brachial artery access for fistulography followed by unidirectional/bidirectional fistula access for intervention. Both groups had similar demographics, fistula characteristics, and stenosis locations.ResultsFewer punctures were required in the transradial group compared to controls (1.2 vs 2.4, P < .0001), and procedure time was shorter (64.9 vs 91.3 minutes, P = .0016). Anatomic, technical, and clinical success rates trended higher in the transradial group compared to controls (93% vs 86%, 96% vs 89%, and 82% vs 64%, respectively). Nonmaturation resulting in fistula abandonment was lower in the transradial group (3.7% vs 25%, P = .025). Primary unassisted patency at 3, 6, and 12 months was 77.1% ± 8.2%, 73.1% ± 8.7%, and 53.3% ± 10.6% in the transradial group, respectively, and 63.0% ± 9.3%, 55.6% ± 9.6%, and 48.1% ± 9.6% in the control group, respectively (P = .76). Primary assisted patency at 12 months was 92.3% ± 5.3% in the transradial group compared to 61.8% ± 9.6% at 12 months in the control group (P = .021). No major complications occurred. Minor complications were lower in the transradial group than in the control group (14% vs 39%, P = .068).ConclusionsTreatment of nonmaturing fistulae via a transradial approach was safe, improved midterm patency, and was associated with lower rates of fistula abandonment.