The “Network Effect” on Interfacility Transfers Among Regional Stroke Certified Hospitals

Introduction and purposeTimely inter-facility transfer of thrombectomy-eligible patients is a mainstay of Stroke Systems of Care. We investigated transfer patterns among stroke certified hospitals in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Metroplex (19 counties, 9,286 sq mi, > 7.7 million people), by hospital network and stroke center status.MethodsWe conducted a North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council (NCTTRAC) Stroke Regional Care Survey at all 44 centers involved in the treatment of MT-eligible ischemic stroke patients between June-September 2019, with a response rate of 100%. All hospitals identified network status, stroke designation – Acute Stroke Ready Hospital (ASRH), Primary Stroke Center (PSC), Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) - and geographic location. Stroke Assessment and Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) screening tool use was evaluated. The distance between the sending and receiving facility was calculated using GPS coordinates. If the closest CSC was not used, the average distance between the selected and the closest CSC was geospatially mapped via R statistical analysis software (Vienna, Austria) gmapsdistance package.ResultsOf the 44 facilities, 6 were ASRHs, 27 were PSCs, 11 were CSCs. Seventy-seven percent (n=34) belonged to one of four hospital networks. All facilities used stroke assessment tools; 57% completed LVO screening. There was significant heterogeneity in inter-facility transfer patterns with no regional standardization. Seventeen percent of ASRHs (n=1) and 56% of PSCs (n=15) conducted inter-facility transfers using ground transportation via EMS. Sixty percent of non-network facilities transferred to the closest CSC. Of the remaining 40%, the average distance between the closest and the selected CSC was 1.5 miles (min max 0.2-2.9 miles). Seventeen percent of network facilities transferred to the closest CSC. Among the remaining 83%, the average distance between the closest and the selected CSC was 4.1 miles (min-max 1-8 miles).ConclusionsNon-network facility status increased the likelihood of transfer to the closest Comprehensive Stroke Center. Transfer distance variability among network facilities may contribute to delays in reperfusion therapy.     

Trends in Interhospital Transfers and Mechanical Thrombectomy for United States Acute Ischemic Stroke Inpatients

Objective: Stroke care in the US is increasingly regionalized. Many patients undergo interhospital transfer to access specialized, time-sensitive interventions such as mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: Using a stratified survey design of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2009-2014) we examined trends in interhospital transfers for ischemic stroke resulting in mechanical thrombectomy. International Classification of Disease—Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes were used to identify stroke admissions and inpatient procedures within endovascular-capable hospitals. Regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with patient outcomes. Results: From 2009-2014, 772,437 ischemic stroke admissions were identified. Stroke admissions that arrived via interhospital transfer increased from 12.5% to 16.8%, 2009-2014 (P-trend < .001). Transfers receiving thrombectomy increased from 4.0% to 5.2%, 2009-2014 (P-trend?=?.016), while those receiving tissue plasminogen activator increased from 16.0% to 20.0%, 2009-2014 (P-trend < .001). One in 4 patients receiving thrombectomy were transferred from another acute care facility (n?=?6,014 of 24,861). Compared to patients arriving via the hospital “front door” receiving mechanical thrombectomy, those arriving via transfer were more often from rural areas and received by teaching hospitals with greater frequency of thrombectomy. Those arriving via interhospital transfer undergoing thrombectomy had greater odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42) versus “front door” arrivals. There were no differences in inpatient mortality (AOR 1.11, 95% CI: .93-1.33). Conclusions: From 2009 to 2014, interhospital stroke transfers to endovascular-capable hospitals increased by one-third. For every ～15 additional transfers over the time period one additional patient received thrombectomy. Optimization of transfers presents an opportunity to increase access to thrombectomy.     

Recurrent stroke arrival time

BackgroundStroke patients and family members should receive stroke education including recognition of stroke symptoms and prompt activation of emergency medical services (EMS). The impact of this education is unclear. We aimed to measure the associations between EMS use and timing of hospital arrival and first-ever and recurrent strokes as a proxy for stroke education.MethodsThe study analyzed data from validated strokes identified by the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) project between 1/1/2000-1/1/2020. We analyzed 5,617 first-ever strokes, 259 instances of recurrent stroke within 1 year of the first (early recurrence), and 451 recurrent strokes over 1 year from the first (late recurrence). Following imputation, associations of both EMS arrival (available starting late 2011) and early arrival (< 3 hours) with first-ever versus recurrent stroke (early and late) were assessed with logistic models, accounting for the clustering of multiple strokes per participant with generalized estimating equations. Full model covariates included stroke type, initial stroke severity, marital status, race/ethnicity, gender, age, insurance, education, and EMS use (early arrival model only).ResultsCompared to first-ever stroke, there were significantly higher unadjusted odds of arrival by EMS for the late recurrence group (late recurrence OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.18-1.99; early arrival OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.87-1.76). The association for late recurrence remained significant after adjustment (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09-1.95). The pre-2010 unadjusted odds of early arrival were non-significant for both early and late recurrence groups (late recurrence OR = 1.05, CI = 0.70-1.56; early recurrence OR = 0.85, CI = 0.54-1.33), while late recurrence was associated with early arrival after 2010 (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.03-1.69). After full adjustment, it was no longer significant (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.96-1.62). Higher initial stroke severity, married status, and EMS use were associated with higher odds of early arrival, while African Americans (AAs) had lower odds than non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). However, AAs did have higher odds of EMS use relative to NHWs. Those who were married and living together had borderline significant lower odds of EMS use compared to those who were not.ConclusionsOur study examines the association of repeat stroke on early arrival and EMS use as a surrogate for adequate stroke education. Recurrence at least one year after the first stroke was associated with higher EMS usage, but there was not enough evidence to establish a relationship with early arrival after accounting for EMS usage and possible confounders. By examining subsets, we can identify groups that would benefit from targeted education. For example, younger, non-AA patients with smaller strokes would benefit from more education on EMS use and African American patients would benefit from education related to faster recognition or urgency of presentation.     

The Effect of a County Prehospital FAST-ED Initiative on Endovascular Treatment Times

BackgroundAcute stroke outcomes depend on timely reperfusion. In 3/2017, local EMS agencies implemented a prehospital triage algorithm with hospital bypass and field activation of the neurointerventional team using the Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED). A score ≥4 bypasses to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and a score ≥6 also has the interventional team field activated off-hours.AimWe analyzed effects of this initiative on volume, acute stroke transfers, treatment times, and outcomes and determined the tool's ability to predict large vessel occlusion.MethodsStroke cases brought to our center by EMS during 3/2016-2/2018 were analyzed, which included one year before and after FAST-ED implementation. Treatment times were compared on- vs. off-hours and to those with field activation.ResultsOf 1153 patients, 761 (67%) were coded as stroke and 235 (20%) underwent reperfusion. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, stroke severity, length of stay, door-to-needle, and 90-d mRS were comparable between periods. Scale compliance was 85%. Concordance rate of ±1 between EMS and calculated score was 53%. Compared to the previous year, door-to-puncture (DTP) improved by 17 min (p < 0.01) overall, 25 min (p < 0.001) off-hours, and 33 min (p < 0.05) with field activation. A cutoff of 4 vs. 6 would have led to 140% increase in field activations but only 36% increase in procedures.ConclusionsThis prehospital initiative led to faster DTP by up to 33 min. The highest impact was off-hours with field activation. Only 1/3 of activations led to endovascular treatment. FAST-ED≥6 appears to be appropriate for field activation.     

Is Door-to-Needle Time Reduced for Emergency Medical Services Transported Stroke Patients Routed Directly to the Computed Tomography Scanner on Emergency Department Arrival?

BackgroundA nationally recommended practice to accelerate thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke is to route emergency medical services (EMS)-transported stroke patients directly to the computed tomography (CT) scanner on arrival. We evaluated door-to-needle time with direct-to-CT routing versus emergency department (ED)-bed first routing.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis from a large regionalized stroke system. Paramedics utilize the modified Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen and transport acute stroke patients to Approved Stroke Centers. Individual stroke centers postarrival protocols vary, with some routing patients directly to CT. Stroke centers report treatment and outcomes to a registry, from which data were abstracted from May 2015 through April 2016. Adult patients transported by EMS and treated with thrombolytic therapy were included. The primary outcome was door-to-needle time. Secondary outcome was door-to-imaging time.ResultsEMS transported 6315 patients for suspected stroke and 789 (13%) were treated with thrombolysis at 41 stroke centers, 171 (22%) at hospitals with direct-to-CT routing and 618 (78%) at hospitals with ED-bed routing. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Door-to-needle time was not different in the 2 groups, median 57 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 44-76) for CT routing versus 54 minutes (IQR 40-74) for ED routing, median difference 3 (95% CI −1, 7), P == .2. Door-to-imaging time was shorter with CT routing compared to ED routing, median 13 minutes (IQR 8-21) and 16 minutes (IQR 10-24), respectively.ConclusionsIn this regional stroke system, hospitals with protocols for routing EMS-transported stroke patients directly to CT did not have reduced door-to-needle compared to hospitals without such protocols.     

Prehospital and Emergency Department-Focused Mission Protocol Improves Thrombolysis Metrics for Suspected Acute Stroke Patients

Background: The Mission Protocol was implemented in 2017 to expedite stroke evaluation and reduce door-to-needle (DTN) times at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital. The key system changes were team-based evaluation of suspected stroke patients at ambulance entrance by an Emergency Department (ED) physician, ED nurse, and neurologist and immediate emergency medical service (EMS) provider transport of patients to CT. Methods: Patients were eligible for a Mission Protocol prehospital stroke activation if an EMS provider found a positive Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale and a last known normal time within 6 hours. We retrospectively compared treatment metrics between the first year of Mission Protocol patients and patients from the year prior also brought in via ambulance with suspected stroke and a last known normal time within 6 hours. Median Door to CT and DTN times were compared using 2 sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) tests. Results: There were 236 patients in the Mission Protocol group and 112 in the comparison group. The Mission Protocol was associated with a 10 minutes faster median door to CT time (P < .00001), a 6 minutes faster median DTN time (P = .0046), a 22% increase in the proportion of patients treated within 45 minutes of arrival (84% versus 62%), and a 12% increase in the proportion of patients treated within 60 minutes (92% versus 80%). There were 8 stroke mimics treated in the Mission Protocol cohort compared to 2 in the comparison cohort. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in one Mission Protocol patient with an ischemic stroke. Conclusions: The EMS direct to CT based Mission Protocol was associated with faster median door to CT and DTN times. There was a 22% increase in the proportion of thrombolysis patients treated within 45 minutes or less. More stroke mimic patients received thrombolysis but symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage only occurred in 1 ischemic stroke patient.     

Code Stroke Patient Referral by Emergency Medical Services During the Public COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic caused public lockdowns around the world. We analyzed if the public lockdown altered the referral pattern of Code Stroke patients by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to our Comprehensive Stroke Center.MethodsRetrospective single-center study at a Bavarian Comprehensive Stroke Center. Patients who were directly referred to our stroke unit by EMS between the 1^st of January 2020 and the 19^th of April 2020 were identified and number of referrals, clinical characteristics and treatment strategies were analyzed during the public lockdown and before. The public lockdown started on 21^st of March and ended on 19^th April 2020.ResultsIn total 241 patients were referred to our center during the study period, i.e. 171 before and 70 during the lockdown. The absolute daily number of Code Stroke referrals and the portion of patients with stroke mimics remained stable. The portion of female stroke patients decreased (55% to 33%; p = 0.03), and stroke severity as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (median 3 (IQR 0-7) versus 6 (IQR 1-15.5) points; p = 0.04) increased during the lockdown. There was no difference of daily numbers of patients receiving thrombolysis and thrombectomy.ConclusionsReferral of Code Stroke patients by EMS could be maintained sufficiently despite the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. However, patients’ health care utilization of the EMS may have changed within the public lockdown. EMS remains a useful tool for Code Stroke patient referral during lockdowns, but public education about stroke is required prior to further lockdowns.     

Activation of emergency medical services for acute stroke in a nonurban population: the T.L.L. Temple Foundation Stroke Project

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Activating emergency medical services (EMS) is the most important factor in reducing delay times to hospital arrival for stroke patients. Determining who calls 911 for stroke would allow more efficient targeting of public health initiatives. METHODS: The T.L.L. Temple Foundation Stroke Project is an acute stroke surveillance and intervention project in nonurban East Texas. Prospective case ascertainment allowed chart abstraction and structured interviews for all hospitalized stroke patients to determine if EMS was activated, and if so, by whom. RESULTS: Of 429 validated strokes, 38.0% activated EMS by calling 911. Logistic regression analysis comparing those who called 911 with those who did not activate EMS found that individuals who were employed were 81% less likely to have EMS activated (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.63). Of the 163 cases in which 911 was called, the person activating EMS was: self (patient), 4.3%; family member of significant other, 60. 1%; paid caregiver, 18.4%; and coworker or other, 12.9%. Significant associations between the variables age group (P=0.02), insurance status (P=0.007), and living alone (P=0.05) with who called 911 was found on chi(2) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Educational efforts directed at patients themselves at risk for stroke may be of low yield. To increase the use of time dependent acute stroke therapy, interventions may wish to concentrate on family, caregivers, and coworkers of high-risk patients. Large employers may be good targets to increase utilization of EMS services for acute stroke.     

A Comparison of Probabilistic and Deterministic Match Strategies for Linking Prehospital and in-Hospital Stroke Registry Data

BackgroundUnderstanding and improving EMS stroke care requires linking data from both the prehospital and hospital settings. In the US, such data is collected in separate de-identified registries that cannot be directly linked due to lack of a common, unique patient identifier. In the absence of unique patient identifiers two common approaches to linking databases are deterministic matching, which uses combinations of non-unique matching variables to define matches, and probabilistic matching, which generates estimates of match probability based on the degree of similarity between records. This analysis seeks to compare these two approaches for matching EMS and stroke registry data.MethodsStroke cases transported by EMS to Michigan hospitals participating in the Michigan Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry were linked to records from Michigan's EMS Information System (MI-EMSIS) between January 2018 and June 2019. Destination hospital, date-of-service, patient age, date-of-birth, and sex were used to perform deterministic and probabilistic linkages. Match rates and representativeness of the matched samples were compared between the two matching strategies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with successful matching.ResultsDuring the 18-month study period there were 8,828 EMS transported confirmed stroke cases in the registry and 620,907 EMS transports to 38 Coverdell registry-participating hospitals. The probabilistic match linked 5985 (67.7%) strokes to EMS records; the deterministic match linked 4012 (45.5%). Within each strategy the characteristics of matched and unmatched cases were similar, with the exception that deterministically matched cases were less likely to be older than 89 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.3), white (aOR=0.8), and more likely to have subarachnoid hemorrhage (aOR=1.4) than unmatched cases.ConclusionProbabilistic matching resulted in higher match rates and a more representative sample of EMS transported strokes, suggesting it may be superior in assessing EMS stroke care compared to a deterministic approach.     

Prehospital Notification from the Emergency Medical Service Reduces the Transfer and Intra-Hospital Processing Times for Acute Stroke Patients

Background and Purpose

There is little information available about the effects of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) hospital notification on transfer and intrahospital processing times in cases of acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

This study retrospectively investigated the real transfer and imaging processing times for cases of suspected acute stroke (AS) with EMS notification of a requirement for intravenous (IV) tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and for cases without notification. Also we compared the intra-hospital processing times for receiving t-PA between patients with and without EMS prehospital notification.

Results

Between December 2008 and August 2009, the EMS transported 102 patients with suspected AS to our stroke center. During the same period, 33 patients received IV t-PA without prehospital notification from the EMS. The mean real transfer time after the EMS call was 56.0±32.0 min. Patients with a transfer distance of more than 40 km could not be transported to our center within 60 min. Among the 102 patients, 55 were transferred via the EMS to our emergency room for IV t-PA. The positive predictive value for stroke (90.9% vs. 68.1%, p=0.005) was much higher and the real transfer time was much faster in patients with an EMS t-PA call (47.7±23.1 min, p=0.004) than in those without one (56.3±32.4 min). The door-to-imaging time (17.8±11.0 min vs. 26.9±11.5 min, p=0.01) and door-to-needle time (29.7±9.6 min vs. 42.1±18.1 min, p=0.01) were significantly shorter in the 18 patients for whom there was prehospital notification and who ultimately received t-PA than in those for whom there was no prehospital notification.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that prehospital notification could enable the rapid dispatch of AS patients needing IV t-PA to a stroke centre. In addition, it could reduce intrahospital delays, particularly, imaging processing times.     

Referral and care for acute ischemic stroke in a Japanese tertiary emergency hospital

To examine the current emergency referral and care for acute stroke at a Japanese tertiary emergency hospital with a 24-h stroke team and care unit, we surveyed the presentations of patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) seen within 7 days of onset. Delay from symptom onset to arrival at our hospital, from arrival to initial diagnostic brain computed tomography (CT), and the type of anti-thrombotic treatments were evaluated. During the 18-month period, there were 254 ischemic events in 244 patients; 239 (94%) had an ischemic stroke and 15 (6%) TIA. Eighty-two (32%) events presented within 3 h of onset, and 102 (40%) and 179 (70%) within the first 6 and 24 h, respectively. The median delay from hospital arrival to CT was 32 min, ranging 10 min to 22 h. Two hundred (79%) events underwent CT within 1 h of arrival (n=172) or at the referral hospitals before transfer (n=28). Direct ambulance transportation and more severe neurological deficits were independent predictors both for early arrival and short in-hospital delay to CT. Anti-thrombotic therapies including anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet medications were given in 237 (93%) episodes. Two (1%) patients received thrombolysis, although 18 (7%) patients fulfilled the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke guidelines for intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator. As in western communities, our pre-hospital emergency referral systems for acute stroke require substantial improvements including the wider use of ambulance calling. Although our in-hospital stroke management is functioning relatively well, further efforts are necessary in reducing the diagnostic delay.     

What is still missing in acute-phase treatment of stroke: a prospective observational study

Early recognition of stroke symptoms and activation of emergency medical service (EMS) positively affects prognosis after a stroke. To assess stroke awareness among stroke patients and medical personnel in the catchment area of Verona Hospital and how it affects stroke care, we prospectively studied timing of acute stroke care in relation to patients’ characteristics. Patients admitted to Medical Departments of Verona University Hospital between January 1st and December 31st 2009 with a diagnosis of TIA or stroke were enrolled. Outcome measures were: time between (i) symptoms onset and hospital arrival, (ii) hospital arrival and brain CT scan, blood examination, ECG and neurological evaluation. The following patient/event characteristics were also collected: means of hospital arrival, sex, age, degree of disability, type of event (first or recurrent) and acute-phase treatment. Of 578 patients providing complete information, 60 % arrived to the emergency department with the EMS (EMS+ group), while 40 % arrived on their own (EMS?). EMS+ group was older than EMS? (mean age 76.2, SD 13.2, vs. 72.3, SD 13, respectively), displayed more severe symptoms (mRS 4 vs. 2) and shorter time interval between symptoms onset and hospital arrival, hospital arrival and CT scan, ECG, laboratory tests and neurological evaluation (p < 0.0001); 22 % of the EMS+ patients were stroke recurrences versus 29 % of the EMS? (p = 0.058); 85 % of thrombolised patients were EMS+. We conclude that there is a lack of awareness of stroke symptoms and risks of recurrence even among patients who already had a stroke and among medical personnel.     

National Trends in Transfer of Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Analysis of 12-Year Nationwide Data

ObjectivesThe guidelines of the American Hospital Association encourage transferring intracerebral hemorrhage patients from community hospitals to centers with stroke expertise. However, research on the differences in outcomes between transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations and directly admitted hospitalizations have been largely limited to small single-center studies. In this study, we explored the national trends in transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations, as well as evaluated the differences, in terms of demographic characteristics, co-morbidity, resource utilization, and outcomes, between transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations and directly admitted hospitalizations.Materials and methodsFrom the National Inpatient Sample (2004 - 2016), we assessed the linear trends in the proportion of interhospital transfers for intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations. We constructed a series of multivariate logistic regression models to explore the association of transfer status with inpatient mortality and discharge disposition, controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics. We used survey design variables to report nationally weighted estimates.ResultsAmong 786,999 hospitalizations, 137,340 (17.5%, 95% CI: 16.4–18.6) were transferred. Overall, interhospital transfers for intracerebral hemorrhage has been increasing over the 12-year period of this study. Patients in transferred hospitalizations were younger, more likely to be white, and more likely to have private insurance. Transferred hospitalizations were associated with significantly lower adjusted odds of inpatient mortality, compared to directly admitted hospitalizations.ConclusionsAs the US healthcare system continues shifting towards value-based care, evidence on the short- and long-term outcomes of transfer of intracerebral hemorrhage patients will inform optimal management of intracerebral hemorrhage patients.     

Stroke-Unit and emergency medical service: a 48-month experience in northern Italy

Since the therapeutic window for acute ischaemic stroke is very short, early arrival at emergency care rooms is mandatory. Emergency medical service (EMS), assuring fast patients transportations, plays a fundamental role in the management of stroke. We have prospectively analysed the utilisation of EMS in the management of stroke patients in a countryside area of northern Italy. Among patients presenting with an acute stroke during the period January 2007–December 2010, those with an ascertained time of onset and documented ongoing brain ischaemia at neuroimaging were included in the study. For all of those patients, the personal data, means of arrival, nature of stroke, whether first stroke or recurrence, severity of stroke and the in-hospital outcome were recorded. Of 1,188 patients hospitalised with a definite diagnosis of stroke, 757 patients were included in the study. Of those, 285 patients (37.6 %) were transported by EMS. EMS allowed earlier admissions (75 % within 3 h of stroke onset), but also transportation of patients of an older age (75 vs. 71 years, p < 0.001), and with more severe strokes (62 % of total anterior circulation infarctions). Our study confirms that EMS is essential in delivering the earliest therapy to patients with acute cerebral infarction living in an extra-urban area of northern Italy. However, work is needed in optimising EMS, since transported patients are often not prone to therapy.     

Visual review of acute stroke neuroimaging prior to transfer acceptance increases likelihood of endovascular therapy

ObjectivesDemand for thrombectomy, and interhospital transfer to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs), for acute stroke is increasing. There is an urgent need to identify patients most likely to benefit from transfer. We evaluated whether CSC providers’ review of neuroimaging prior to transfer acceptance improved patient selection for thrombectomy and correlated with higher rates of treatment.Materials and methodsA retrospective database of all patients transferred to Stanford's CSC for thrombectomy between 2015-2019 was used. Pre-acceptance images, when available for visual review, were reviewed by the CSC stroke team via virtual PACS, RAPID software, or LifeImage platforms.Results525 patients met inclusion criteria. 147 (28%) had neuroimaging available for review prior to transfer. Of those who did not recanalize en route, 267 (50.8%) underwent thrombectomy. Patients with imaging available for review prior to acceptance were significantly more likely to receive thrombectomy (68% vs 54%, RR 1.26; p=0.006, 95% CI 1.09-1.48). Patient images that were reviewed via RAPID were CT-based perfusion studies; these were more likely to receive thrombectomy (70% vs 54%, RR 1.30; p=0.01, 1.09-1.56). Patients who received EVT were more likely to have had pre-transfer vessel imaging, regardless of availability for visual review (76% vs 59%, RR 1.44; p<0.001, 1.18-1.76).ConclusionsPatients with concern for acute stroke transferred for consideration of thrombectomy who had neuroimaging visually reviewed prior to transfer acceptance and did not recanalize by time of arrival were significantly more likely to undergo thrombectomy. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.     

Stroke in Airplane Passengers: A Study from a Large International Hub

IntroductionStroke in air travelers is being increasingly recognized. We report on stroke among passengers arriving at or transiting through a busy air travel hub.MethodsThe stroke database of the sole tertiary care center for stroke in a large busy international hub was interrogated. Demographic data of transit passengers, their stroke risk factors, stroke severity, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), acute stroke interventions, discharge status and outcome utilizing the Modified Raking scale (mRS) were retrieved and compared between passengers and non-passenger controls.ResultsForty-three flight-related stroke patients were compared to 2564 non-passenger stroke patients. The mean age in the flight-related stroke group was 59.53±10.83 years, 30/43 (69.8%) were males. The stroke subtypes were ischemic in 30 (69.8%) patients, hemorrhagic in 9 (20.9%), and transient ischemic attack in 3 (7.0%), with one cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (2.3%). The mean NIHSS score was 7.79±6.44 in passengers, demonstrating moderate severity. Ten patients (23.3%) received thrombolysis, one (2.3%) received thrombectomy, and one (2.3%) received both thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Outcomes, 54.8% had a good outcome (mRS 0-2), and 45.2% had dependence/death (mRS 3-6).ConclusionAir passengers with stroke were found to be older with more severe strokes and a higher probability of receiving acute stroke treatment compared to non-passengers. Increased awareness with appropriate and timely recognition and triaging of transit passengers with stroke is warranted.     

Interactive Direct Interhospital Transfer Network System for Acute Stroke in South Korea

Background and PurposeInterhospital transfer is an essential practical component of regional stroke care systems. To establish an effective stroke transfer network in South Korea, an interactive transfer system was constructed, and its workflow metrics were observed.MethodsIn March 2019, a direct transfer system between primary stroke hospitals (PSHs) and comprehensive regional stroke centers (CSCs) was established to standardize the clinical pathway of imaging, recanalization therapy, transfer decisions, and exclusive transfer linkage systems in the two types of centers. In an active case, the time metrics from arrival at PSH (“door”) to imaging was measured, and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT) were used to assess the differences in clinical situations.ResultsThe direct transfer system was used by 27 patients. They stayed at the PSH for a median duration of 72 min (interquartile range [IQR], 38–114 min), with a median times of 15 and 58 min for imaging and subsequent processing, respectively. The door-to-needle median times of subjects treated with IVT at PSHs (n=5) and CSCs (n=2) were 21 min (IQR, 20.0–22.0 min) and 137.5 min (IQR, 125.3–149.8 min), respectively. EVT was performed on seven subjects (25.9%) at CSCs, which took a median duration of 175 min; 77 min at the PSH, 48 min for transportation, and 50 min at the CSC. Before EVT, bridging IVT at the PSH did not significantly affect the door-to-puncture time (127 min vs. 143.5 min, p=0.86).ConclusionsThe direct and interactive transfer system is feasible in real-world practice in South Korea and presents merits in reducing the treatment delay by sharing information during transfer.     

Analysis of Stroke Care Among 2019-2020 National Emergency Medical Services Information System Encounters

ObjectivesEmergency Medicine Service (EMS) providers play a pivotal role in early identification and initiation of treatment for stroke. The objective of this study is to characterize nationwide EMS practices for suspected stroke and assess for gender-based differences in compliance with American Stroke Association (ASA) guidelines.Materials and MethodsUsing the 2019-2020 National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) Datasets, we identified encounters with an EMS designated primary impression of stroke. We characterized patient characteristics and EMS practices and assessed compliance with eight metrics for “guideline-concordant” care. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between gender and the primary outcome (guideline-concordant care), adjusted for age, EMS level of service, EMS geographical region, region type (i.e. urban or rural), and year.ResultsOf 693,177 encounters with a primary impression of stroke, overall compliance with each performance metric ranged from 18% (providing supplemental oxygen when the pulse oximetry is less than 94%) to 76% (less than 90sec from incoming call to EMS dispatch). 2,382 (0.39%) encounters were fully guideline-concordant. Women were significantly less likely than men to receive guideline-concordant care (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89; 0.36% women, 0.43% men with guideline-concordant care).ConclusionsA minority of patients received prehospital stroke care that was documented to be compliant with ASA guidelines. Women were less likely to receive fully guideline-compliant care compared to men, after controlling for confounders, although the difference was small and of uncertain climical importance. Further studies are needed to evaluate the underlying reasons for this disparity, its impact on patient outcomes, and to identify potential targeted interventions to improve prehospital stroke care.     

Telemedicine impact on post-stroke outpatient follow-up in an academic healthcare network during the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundThe expansion of telemedicine associated with the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced outpatient medical care. The objective of our study was to determine the impact of telemedicine on post-acute stroke clinic follow-up.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the impact of telemedicine in Emory Healthcare, an academic healthcare system of comprehensive and primary stroke centers in Atlanta, Georgia, on post-hospital stroke clinic follow-up. We compared the frequency of 90-day follow-up in a centralized subspecialty stroke clinic among patients hospitalized before the local COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2019- February 28, 2020), during (March 1- April 30, 2020) and after telemedicine implementation (May 1- December 31, 2020). A comparison was made across hospitals less than 1 mile, 10 miles, and 25 miles from the stroke clinic.ResultsOf 1096 ischemic stroke patients discharged home or to a rehab facility during the study period, 342 (31%) had follow-up in the Emory Stroke Clinic (comprehensive stroke center 46%, primary stroke center 10 miles away 18%, primary stroke center 25 miles away 14%). Overall, 90-day follow-up increased from 19% to 41% after telemedicine implementation (p<0.001) with telemedicine appointments amounting for up to 28% of all follow-up visits. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with teleneurology follow-up (vs no follow-up) included discharge from the comprehensive stroke center, thrombectomy treatment, private insurance, private transport to the hospital, NIHSS 0-5 and history of dyslipidemia.ConclusionsDespite telemedicine implementation at an academic healthcare network successfully increasing post-stroke discharge follow-up in a centralized subspecialty stroke clinic, the majority of patients did not complete 90-day follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Modified Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation (MAStR): feasibility study of a method to apply procedural memory concepts to transfer training

Objective: Training and implementation for a multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation method emphasizing procedural memory.

Background: Current practice in stroke rehabilitation relies on explicit memory, often compromised by stroke, failing to capitalize on better-preserved procedural memory skills. Recruitment of procedural memory requires consistency and practice, characteristics difficulty to promote on inpatient rehabilitation units. We designed a method Modified Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation (MAStR) to maximize consistency and practice for transfer training with stroke patients.

Design: Phase I, single-group study. MAStR has two innovations: (1) simplification of instructions to only three words, other direction provided non-verbally; (2) having all rehabilitation staff apply the same approach for transfers. Staff training in MAStR included review of written material describing the rationale for MAStR and demonstration of a transfer using MAStR. Enrolled patients completed each transfer with MAStR in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy.

Results: The MAStR method was taught to a large, multidisciplinary rehabilitation staff (n = 31). Training and certification required 15 min per staff member. Five stroke patients were enrolled. No transfers with MAStR resulted in injury, no negative feedback was received from staff or patients. Staff reported satisfaction with the brief MAStR training and reported transfers were easier to complete with the MAStR method.

Conclusions: Feasibility was demonstrated for an innovative application of procedural memory concepts to stroke rehabilitation. All rehabilitation disciplines were successfully trained. MAStR was well-tolerated and liked by rehabilitation staff and patients. These results support pursuit of a Phase II pilot study.