Mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression for late cardiac-transplant recipients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-related renal failure is a common problem after cardiac transplantation (HTx). The aim of this study was to introduce a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen to HTx recipients with late posttransplant renal impairment and to evaluate the impact of conversion to this new immunosuppression (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] and sirolimus [Sir]) treatment on renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one HTx patients (25 men, 6 women; 0.2-14.2 years after transplantation) with CNI-based immunosuppression and a serum creatinine greater than 1.9 mg/dL were included in the study. Creatinine and cystatin levels were monitored to detect renal function. Mean patient age was 50+/-14 (range 19-74) years. Conversion was started with 6 mg Sir, continued with 2 mg, and the dose was adjusted to achieve target trough levels between 8 and 14 ng/mL. MMF was continued with trough level adjusted (1.5-4 microg/mL). Subsequently, the CNIs were tapered down and stopped. Clinical follow-up (first and every 3 months after conversion) included endomyocardial biopsies, echocardiography, and laboratory studies. Survival was 90% after a mean follow-up of 13+/-95 months. No acute rejection episode was detected during the study period. Renal function improved significantly after conversion: creatinine preconversion vs. postconversion: 3.14+/-0.76 mg/dL vs. 2.14+/-0.83 mg/dL, P =0.001. Cystatin preconversion vs. postconversion: 2.95+/-1.06 mg/L vs. 2.02+/-1.1 mg/L, P =0.01. In three patients, hemodialysis therapy was stopped completely after conversion. Graft function remained stable. Fractional shortening preconversion vs. postconversion: 36.9+/-6% vs. 36.4+/-6%. There were no serious adverse events. One patient had to be excluded because of noncompliance. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from CNI-based immunosuppression to MMF and Sir in HTx patients with chronic renal failure was safe, preserved graft function, and improved renal function.     

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in high-risk renal allograft recipients on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression

OBJECTIVE: In a randomized control trial of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) with cyclosporine and steroids, we demonstrated that MMF reduced acute rejection (AR) among renal allograft recipients (RTX) who were of low to moderate risk. However, 10% had AR when converted from MMF to AZA at 6 months, postrenal transplantation (RT). Two clinical markers, abnormal serum creatinine (SCr) and proteinuria at 6 months, post-RT, were associated with AR postconversion. The present study examined the safety of such conversion in selected high-risk RTX at 1 year of MMF therapy. METHODS: Thirteen high-risk RTX receiving MMF for either high panel reactive antibody (n = 9) or following AR (n = 4), with normal SCr and no proteinuria at 1 year, were selected for conversion. The incidence of AR, adverse events, and renal parameters (SCr, creatinine clearance, proteinuria) at 6 months postconversion was evaluated. Eight high-risk RTX who did not meet these selection criteria were retrospectively reviewed and used as controls. RESULTS: Renal parameters (SCr 123 +/- 26 vs 129 +/- 27 mumol/L; pre- vs postconversion) were not significantly different; no episodes of AR or proteinuria were documented. Azathioprine was discontinued in two patients due to leukopenia. In the control group, one patient had graft loss from chronic rejection, whereas one developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease necessitating MMF withdrawal. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that selective conversion from MMF to AZA after 1 year is safe, even in high-risk RTX. Normal SCr and absence of proteinuria are good screening parameters to identify patients at low risk for AR following such conversion.     

Renal allograft biopsy and conversion of cyclosporine to azathioprine

A prospective nonrandomized study was conducted to evaluate the results of two conversion protocols on two similar groups of renal graft recipients totaling 54 patients who were converted from CsA to AZA at 6-12 months posttransplant. With protocol I, 24 patients (3 haploidentical, 21 cadaveric recipients) were converted with a graft biopsy followed by a 14-day overlap of CsA and AZA before the CsA dose was tapered and discontinued in 6 days. Of the 24 patients, 8 were found to have occult rejection in biopsy and received methylprednisolone 500 mg boluses for three days before overlap started. Thirty patients (2 haploidentical, 28 cadaveric recipients) were converted with protocol II, which had CsA and AZA overlap and tapering schedules identical to those of protocol I without a preconversion biopsy. Follow-up extended as far as 3 years posttransplant. There was a substantial incidence of chronic rejection and graft loss after conversion in protocol II patients. We also found that there was a possible link between postconversion acute rejection and late graft loss from chronic rejection. The incidence of acute rejection after conversion was significantly lower among protocol I patients as compared with that of protocol II (4% vs. 37%, P less than 0.001). However, if 8 patients with occult rejection in the preconversion biopsy were added to the total number of postconversion rejection in protocol I, the incidence of postconversion rejection in this group (38%) would be similar to that of protocol II. Using the time of conversion as the onset of the risk, protocol I patients had better graft survival than protocol II (100% vs. 80%, P less than 0.005) at 3 years posttransplant. If conversion becomes necessary, we recommend a preconversion graft biopsy to identify and treat patients with occult rejection before the beginning of CsA and AZA overlap, especially for those patients whose creatinine is higher than 2 mg/dl without obvious cause before conversion.     

Preliminary experience with mycophenolate mofetil for preservation of renal function in cardiac transplant patients with documented cyclosporine nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CyA) has positively impacted on the outcome of cardiac transplantation; however, the nephrotoxicity associated with CyA has been a major drawback. METHODS: In an effort to reduce exposure to CyA and possibly alleviate its nephrotoxic effects, we undertook a therapeutic strategy to switch cardiac transplant patients with biopsy-proven CyA nephrotoxicity from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with subsequent CyA dose reduction or elimination. RESULTS: MMF was substituted for AZA in five cardiac transplant patients (four males; mean age, 60 +/- 6 years old; average time from transplant was 7 +/- 3 years) who had biopsy proven evidence of CyA nephrotoxicity, and in whom CyA dose was reduced (3/5) or discontinued (2/5). At the time of the therapeutic intervention, four patients had an average serum creatinine of 230 +/- 62 micromol/L and one patient had just been started on haemodialysis (HD). During an average follow-up period of 42 months, the slope of the inverse serum creatinine significantly improved in three patients and continued to deteriorate in one patient. The patient on HD could be transiently taken off HD. However, he developed a severe episode of cardiac rejection requiring antirejection therapy and increase in the dose of CyA. The patient was subsequently returned back on HD. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary report, we show that AZA to MMF switch with subsequent CyA dose reduction or discontinuation may slow down the progression of kidney disease in some patients. However, the patients should be followed closely for evidence of cardiac rejection.     

Reversal of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after heart transplantation-potential role of mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (CCN) after heart transplantation is a progressive condition that may lead to end-stage renal failure. The extent to which CCN is reversible with reduction or withdrawal of cyclosporine therapy is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the reversibility of CCN and to assess the safety and efficacy of a strategy of cyclosporine dosage reduction, combined with conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil (AZA/MMF switch) to maintain immunosuppression. METHODS: An AZA/MMF switch followed by cyclosporine dose reduction was undertaken in 30 heart transplant recipients (23 men, 7 women; mean age, 54 +/- 2 years) with established CCN at a mean of 90 +/- 9 months after transplantation (range, 17-182 months). The mean maintenance MMF dosage was 2.3 +/- 0.1 g/day (n = 28). Mean cyclosporine dosage was decreased from 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day before AZA/MMF switch to 1.6 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: Three patients (10%) were withdrawn from MMF, 2 because of diarrhea and the third because of severe pneumonia that developed within 2 weeks of AZA/MMF switch. All 3 were restabilized with AZA. One patient (4%) experienced acute rejection 7 months after AZA/MMF switch. This resolved after an oral pulse of prednisolone. Systemic infections occurred in 6 patients within 12 months of AZA/MMF switch. Actuarial survival 1 year after AZA/MMF switch was 86% +/- 6%. One patient died of infection and 3 of other causes. Serum creatinine concentration decreased from 248 +/- 15 micromol/liter before cyclosporine dosage reduction to 193 +/- 11 micromol/liter and 206 +/- 19 micromol/liter at 3 and 12 months after dosage reduction (both p < 0.01 versus baseline, n = 23). Of the 23 patients who remained on MMF at 12 months, a decrease in serum creatinine was documented in 19 (83%). Four patients showed no improvement or showed deterioration in renal function, and three of these progressed to end-stage renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity has a significant reversible component in most patients. A strategy of AZA/MMF switch combined with cyclosporine dosage reduction is generally well tolerated and results in short-term improvement in renal function in most patients. Close vigilance is required during the first 12 months after AZA/MMF switch because both acute rejection and infection may occur.     

Randomized, prospective trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: In simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplantation, manifestations of renal allograft rejection typically become evident before those of pancreatic rejection. This study compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in prevention of renal rejection after primary SPK transplantation. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, multicenter study, patients received MMF 1.5 g twice daily (n=74) or AZA 1-3 mg/kg daily (n=76) for 1 year after transplantation. The incidence of rejection was assessed at 6 months. Adverse events were tracked through 1 year. Survival data are reported through 2 years. RESULTS: At 6 months, efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: rejection (27% vs. 39%); rejection or death (34% vs. 42%); rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal (i.e., treatment failure; 41% vs. 55%). Six-month efficacy trends favored MMF, and time to rejection or treatment failure was significantly longer when compared with AZA (P=0.049). One-year efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: treatment of renal rejection (35% vs. 47%); renal allograft loss or death (9% vs. 12%); pancreas allograft loss or death (15% vs. 14%). Five MMF patients (7%) and four (5%) in the AZA group died. More MMF than AZA patients developed opportunistic infections (54% vs. 38%), but the pathogens did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Trends for most efficacy parameters favored MMF over AZA, and time to renal allograft rejection or treatment failure was statistically significantly longer for MMF. The use of MMF in the treatment of SPK recipients is a useful advance.     

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine therapy is associated with a significant protection against long-term renal allograft function deterioration

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association of long-term continuous mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) therapy and renal allograft function, as measured by the slope of reciprocal creatinine, we analyzed 49,666 primary renal allograft recipients reported to the United States Renal Data System between October 31, 1988 and June 30, 1998. METHODS: The primary study endpoint was defined as a greater than 20% decrease below a 6-month baseline of 1/serum creatinine (SCr) (slope of reciprocal creatinine) at or beyond 1 year after transplantation. A secondary endpoint was defined as reaching an SCr value greater than 1.6 mg/dL. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the risk of reaching the study endpoints. Multivariate analyses were corrected for potential confounding covariates. RESULTS: According to the Cox proportional hazard model, 12-month continued therapy of MMF versus AZA was associated with a protective effect against declining renal function, as measured by the slope of reciprocal creatinine (relative risk [RR]=0.84, confidence interval 0.78-0.91, P<0.001). For 24-month continued therapy of MMF versus AZA, MMF was associated with a further decreased risk for a decline in renal function (RR=0.66, confidence interval=0.57-0.77, P<0.001). Furthermore, MMF was associated with a protective effect against reaching the SCr threshold of 1.6 mg/dL (RR=0.80, P<0.001) beyond 12 months posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous use of MMF versus AZA was associated with a protective effect against declining renal function beyond 1 year after transplantation. Further study is needed to confirm that continued MMF therapy is protective against long-term deterioration in renal function.     

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplant recipients: a single center experience.

The long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) is associated with significant morbidity in liver transplant recipients. Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is well tolerated, two small studies reported an unacceptable rate of acute allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients receiving MMF monotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the safety and efficacy of MMF monotherapy in liver transplant recipients. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent liver transplant at our institution. Sixteen patients were identified who received MMF either as monotherapy (n = 13) or with corticosteroids (n = 3; 2 of them for other comorbid conditions), and these patients were studied to determine the efficacy and complications. Fifteen (15/16) patients were converted from a CI to MMF because of renal insufficiency. Patients were converted to MMF monotherapy after a median of 2,056 days (range, 606-5,893) after liver transplantation. The median postconversion follow-up was 668 days (range, 60-1,509). Four patients required dialysis despite conversion; of those patients not requiring dialysis, serum creatinine stabilized and showed a trend toward improvement (2.51 +/- 1.12 mg/dL to 1.85 +/- .58 mg/dL, P = .1). However, there were 3 episodes (47, 107, and 1,203 days after conversion) of severe, irreversible allograft rejection after conversion resulting in death in 2 patients and necessitating retransplantation in 1 patient. There were no patient characteristics, except perhaps African-American race, that predicted the development of rejection. In conclusion, MMF monotherapy was associated with a significant risk (19%) of unpredictable, severe, and irreversible allograft rejection even among long-term transplant survivors. Caution should be exercised before converting patients to MMF monotherapy.     

Conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil followed by calcineurin inhibitor minimization or elimination in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the conversion from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) followed by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) elimination or minimization in patients with progressive chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). METHODS: Between November 6, 1999 and February 12, 2003, 169 patients receiving CNI/AZA/prednisone (153 CsA; 14 tacrolimus) were included in this study. Demographics, immunosuppression, graft function, hematology, and biochemistry were obtained before (-6, -3, and -1 month) and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after and at last follow-up visit after conversion. RESULTS: Mean age was 34 +/- 12 years, 66% males, 51% Caucasian, and 72% living allograft recipients. Mean follow-up times before and after conversion were 32.4 and 19.4 months; 10 patients completed 3 years of follow-up. CNI elimination was performed in 39% and minimization in 61% of patients. Overall there was significantly improved graft function at 1 year after conversion (2.6 +/- 1.0 vs 2.1 +/- 0.6 mg/dL, P = .038). The slopes of the regression lines of 1/Cr vs time were significantly improved from preconversion to after conversion (-0.026 vs +0.007 mg(-1)/dL per day(-1), P = .001). There was a significant decrease in mean systolic (141 +/- 21 vs 135 +/- 22 mm Hg, P = .015) and diastolic (89 +/- 15 vs 84 +/- 14 mm Hg, P = .005) blood pressure values at 1 year. There were four episodes of acute rejection (Banff IA) treated with steroids. Three years after conversion, patient and graft survivals were 95% and 79%, respectively. One patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. CONCLUSION: Among patients with CAD, conversion from AZA to MMF followed by CNI minimization or elimination was a safe and effective strategy to preserve or improve graft function.     

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of chronic renal rejection

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of chronic renal rejection in rats. Studies on the efficacy of MMF in chronic renal rejection in man are scarce and controversial. AIM: The aim of this study was to verify in a prospective non-randomized study the efficacy of MMF given at the dose of 2 g/day in substitution of azathioprine (AZA) in the chronic rejection of cadaveric kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with histologically proven chronic renal rejection were enrolled. The patients were 5 males and 7 females. Mean age 38.3 +/- 13.8 years, with a mean duration of transplant of 39 +/- 19 months. Mean serum creatinine values at -6, -3, 0, +3, +6, +12 months were respectively 1.72 +/- 0.33, 1.84 +/- 0.36, 2.15 +/- 0.50, 1.88 +/- 0.54, 1.81 +/- 0.71, 1.73 +/- 0.58 mg/dl. Mean creatinine clearance values were 58.85 +/- 10.06,48.8 +/- 13.3,45.8 +/- 10.2, 54.7 +/- 13.3, 51 +/- 12.7, 57.7 +/- 18.5 ml/min. Mean deltaGFR before MMF was -2.15 ml/month. RESULTS: After MMF introduction, the overall GFR decrease attenuated. In particular in seven patients after MMF administration, we obtained a significant reduction of mean serum creatinine value (1.84 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.41mg/dl; p = 0.004). In three patients, we obtained a stabilization in GFR. Two patients were slowly progressing even after MMF introduction. After a switch to MMF in almost all patients, we obtained an improvement of renal function. In three patients, we obtained a stabilization of renal function without regression. In particular, seven patients showed a remarkable improvement of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion our data even if concerning a small number of patients, confirm the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of renal allograft chronic dysfunction.     

Cyclosporin withdrawal with concomitant conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy: a 2-year follow-up

Because recent large studies have demonstrated that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to azathioprine (AZA) as a post-transplant immunosuppressant, it has been speculated that MMF could have a cyclosporin (CsA)-sparing effect in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft dysfunction. Between April 1996 and October 1998, 31 patients with chronic allograft dysfunction were assigned to have conversion from AZA to MMF with concomitant CsA withdrawal. Patient and graft outcomes were analysed. Mean follow-up time after MMF conversion was 27+/-11 months. Serum creatinine concentration (sCt) significantly decreased after conversion and remained stable at the end of follow-up (227+/-31 micro mol/l vs. 185+/-50 micro mol/l; P<0.0005). Mean variation in sCt was -24% after conversion, whereas it was +20% in the year before conversion ( P<0.001). There was a significant inverse relationship between proteinuria at baseline and improvement in renal function (r=-0.35; P=0.01). Proteinuria increased during follow-up (0.79+/-0.6 vs. 1.79+/-1.08 g/day; P=0.04). Isolated CsA nephropathy was associated with the best outcome. Renal function significantly improved in patients with grade 1 chronic rejection and remained stable in patients with grade 2 chronic rejection. Two patients (6.5%) experienced late acute rejection, respectively 13 and 24 months after CsA withdrawal. Eight patients (29%) experienced systemic infections requiring hospitalization. Blood pressure control and lipid profile improved after conversion. CsA withdrawal with a concomitant switch from AZA to MMF allows a substantial and durable improvement in renal function. Both allograft histology and proteinuria at baseline are predictive of the evolution of renal function after conversion. Physicians should consider the risk of over-immunosuppression possibly associated with this therapeutic strategy.     

Rapamycin at six years can exhibit normal renal function without proteinuria or neoplasia after renal transplantation. A single-center experience

Currently, long-term experience with Rapamune (RAPA) after renal transplantation is scarce. We present our experience with RAPA in patients who were included in clinical trials. Between 1996 and 1999, 27 renal transplant patients received RAPA alone or in combination with cyclosporine (CyA). We study 15 of them (9 males, 6 females; mean age 36 years) who are currently functioning with a mean follow-up of 6 years (range, 5.2-8 years). The presence of delayed graft function was 40% and acute rejection 26.6%, all of them controlled with steroids. Notably, no patients experienced an acute rejection episode after the first year. Among 15 patients, 12 received steroids, RAPA and CyA; and 3 received steroids, RAPA, azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for immunosuppression. At the end of follow-up, the situation was the opposite: 12 patients received steroids (2.5-5 mg/d) and RAPA associated with or without AZA/MMF, and 3 were maintained with steroids, RAPA and CyA. Renal function was excellent in the entire group: mean SCr 1.1 mg/dL (range, 0.7-1.8) with mean RAPA blood levels (HPLC) of 11 ng/dL (range 8-16). Hyperlipidemia was universal with all patients (100%) receiving statins maintaining acceptable levels of cholesterol (mean 209 +/- 28 mg/dL) and tryglycerides (mean 154 +/- 76 mg/dL). Arterial hypertension present in 12 of 15 (80%) patients was controlled with a mean of 1.5 drugs. Notably, no patient presented with proteinuria, neoplasia, posttransplant diabetes, or cardiovascular events. In conclusion, these single-center results suggest that Rapamune may be useful in the long-run after renal transplantation. The presence of normal renal function and the absence of proteinuria and neoplasia in these renal transplant patients may have important clinical implications.     

A case of acute vascular rejection after overseas deceased kidney transplantation

Abstract:  A 54-yr-old Japanese male received overseas deceased kidney transplantation in January 2006. His allograft functioned immediately and he received immunosuppression with cyclosporine A (CyA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (PR). On day 24 after transplantation, he came back to Japan. His serum creatinine level (s-Cr) was 1.39 mg/dL at two months after transplantation when he was admitted into Toda Central General Hospital on March 2006, for follow-up his renal allograft. He had taken only two immunosuppressive drugs, MMF and PR, and had not taken CyA at that time. His serum creatinine gradually rose after hospitalization. Allograft biopsy performed on April 6, 2006, showed acute vascular rejection (Banff 97 acute/active cellular rejection Grade III), together with suspicious for acute humoral rejection (Banff 97 antibody-mediated rejection Grade II). After treatment of two courses of steroid pulses and five d of gusperimus, acute vascular rejection and acute humoral rejection were relieved, which had been proven by the third allograft biopsy. In conclusion, this was a case of acute vascular rejection after overseas deceased kidney transplantation, resulted from non-compliance with immunosuppressive therapy.     

Mycophenolate mofetil may allow cyclosporine and steroid sparing in de novo heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) provides superior prophylaxis against acute rejection when compared with azathioprine (AZA) in heart and renal transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this results in improved survival or reduced morbidity after heart transplantation. METHOD: In a sequential study, 240 cardiac transplant patients were treated with either MMF (n=119) or AZA (n=121) both in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids after rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. RESULTS: By protocol lower cyclosporine levels were targeted in the MMF group during the first year (e.g. 203+/-52 ng/mL MMF vs. 236+/-59 ng/mL AZA, P=0.0006 at 6 months). Patient survival at 1 year (82% MMF vs. 79% AZA, P=0.55) and at 3 years was similar in both groups. The cumulative probability of receiving antirejection treatment within 1 year was lower in the MMF group, as was biopsy-proven acute rejection with International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or =3A (24% vs. 35%, P=0.03). The MMF group also had fewer episodes requiring cytolytic therapy (6% vs. 13%, P=0.04) and more patients had steroids withdrawn by 1 year (66% vs. 32%, P<0.001). Renal function was better in the MMF group with lower creatinine levels at 1 year (133+/-45 vs. 155+/-46 micromol/L, P=0.0004). Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft and Gault formula) at 1 year was also better (MMF 74+/-32 mL/min vs. AZA 62+/-24 mL/min, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that immunosuppression with MMF rather than AZA may allow lower cyclosporine levels, better renal function, and increased steroid weaning at 1 year while also achieving better control of acute rejection.     

Sirolimus attenuates the rate of progression of early chronic allograft nephropathy

Optimal treatment for patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is not known. Early intervention is preferred. We examined the benefit of adding sirolimus (SRL; C(0) 5-12 ng/mL: HPLC) on the rate of progression of early CAN. We identified patients with biopsy-confirmed Banff grade 1 CAN. After biopsy, patients were switched to SRL + CsA + prednisolone (SRL), MMF + CsA + prednisolone (MMF), or CsA + AZA + prednisolone (AZA). GFR was estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulae. The rate of GFR decline (delta GFR) was determined by calculating the slope of the regression line of estimated GFR (MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault method) at different times. Statistical analysis was performed by the Wilcoxon test. The 41 patients with CAN grade 1 were assigned to SRL: MMF: AZA = 12: 20: 9. Before biopsy; the graft age for SRL: MMF: AZA were 56 +/- 27: 70 +/- 48: 51 +/- 36 months; and the GFR (MDRD method), 38 +/- 8: 42 +/- 15: 36 +/- 14 mL/min; GFR (C-G method) 45 +/- 13, 42 +/- 12, 41 +/- 15 mL/min; trough CsA levels 152 +/- 36: 145 +/- 46: 177 +/- 61 ng/dL; delta GFR (MDRD method) -0.18 +/- 0.20: -0.15 +/- 0.59: -0.20 +/- 1.08; delta GFR (C-G method) -0.13 +/- 0.37: -0.19 +/- 0.24: -0.65 +/- 0.99. Follow-up time for SRL: MMF: AZA was 19 +/- 4: 35 +/- 32: 59 +/- 54 months. At last follow-up; GFR (MDRD method) for SRL: MMF: AZA were 39 +/- 13: 35 +/- 21: 40 +/- 24 mL/min; GFR (C-G method) 46 +/- 17, 37 +/- 18, 46 +/- 25 mL/min; BP 128 +/- 11/79 +/- 7: 131 +/- 22/80 +/- 14: 132 +/- 20/82 +/- 11 mm Hg; and CsA level 52 +/- 25: 122 +/- 41: 155 +/- 49. After biopsy, statin was prescribed in nine SRL, 10 MMF, and three AZA. ACEI was prescribed in two SRL, three MMF, and two AZA. Compared with the prebiopsy values, the delta GFR (MDRD method) changed to -0.04 +/- 0.31 (SRL; P = .04), -0.17 +/- 0.40 (MMF; P = .60), and -0.97 +/- 1.52 (AZA: P = .16). Delta GFR (C-G method) was also significantly improved in the SRL group (-0.02 +/- 0.47; P = .05) but not in the MMF (-0.13 +/- 0.51; P = .53) or AZA (-0.54 +/- 1.78; P = .44). We concluded that patients with early CAN who are switched to SRL and low-dose CsA have a significant attenuation of the rate of GFR declination when compared with patients who receive MMF or AZA addition.     

Renal transplant patients with gastrointestinal intolerability to mycophenolate mofetil: conversion to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium

The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was an important advance in immunosuppressive therapy, although its use is limited by adverse gastrointestinal events. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; myfortic) has been developed to avoid these side effects. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that EC-MPS is a safe drug in both de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients. In this prospective study, therapeutically equivalent doses of EC-MPS were administered to 39 stable kidney transplant patients receiving MMF. After 3 months of treatment with EC-MPS the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal events was lower (15.8% of the patients). There were higher levels of mycophenolic acid after conversion to EC-MPS, probably due to better absorption. These factors allowed decreased doses and levels of calcineurin inhibitors without increasing the risk of graft rejection. At 3 months postconversion, serum creatinine improved from the mean baseline value of 1.83 +/- 0.12 mg/dL to 1.70 +/- 0.10 mg/dL. In conclusion, EC-MPS was well tolerated in maintenance renal transplant patients with adverse gastrointestinal events secondary to MMF.     

Posttransplantation conversion to sirolimus-based immunosuppression: a single center experience

Sirolimus (SRL) has become an option in kidney transplantation, especially among patients who develop chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRL in 103 kidney recipients of mean age 40 years, including 78 recipients of organs from deceased donors. The major reason for conversion was calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity (42.3%) followed by CAN (35.4%). A preconversion kidney biopsy was performed in 89 patients with CAN diagnosed in 51. Mean time to conversion was 40.5 months. The new therapy was: SRL/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone (Pred) in 79 patients; SRL/tacrolimus (TAC)/Pred in 15; and other SRL combinations in 9. The target SRL trough level was 5.0 to 8.0 ng/mL. To evaluate the impact of conversion on renal function, we compared the proteinuria and inverse serum creatinine at 3 months before conversion, at conversion, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postconversion. The overall mean follow-up time was 13.2 months. The analysis showed significant improvement in renal function at month 1 postconversion (P<.05) with stabilization thereafter. The SRL/MMF combination frequently induced anemia and/or leukopenia (n=23). Infections included pneumonia (n=10), herpes zoster (n=7), herpes simplex (n=3), cytomegalovirus (n=2), histoplasmosis (n=2), tuberculosis (n=2), and neurocryptococcosis (n=1). Reasons for SRL discontinuation were myelotoxicity (n=4), infection (n=3), nephrotoxicity (n=3), gastrointestinal intolerance (n=3), myopathy (n=1), pneumonitis (n=1), hyperlipidemia (n=1), and other reasons (n=3). Graft loss occurred in 29 patients due to CAN (n=21) followed by death (cardiovascular, n=2; infectious, n=2), acute rejection (n=3), and infection following immunosuppression withdrawal (n=1). We concluded that SRL represented an option but reducing associated immunosuppression should strongly be considered to minimize the frequent side effects, especially infections.     

Renal function and safety of heart transplant recipients switched to mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: We evaluated cyclosporine (CSA) dose reduction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment versus maintained CSA dosage and azathioprine (AZA) in HTX regarding renal function and safety from CSA nephrotoxicity (creatinine > 1.7 mg/dL). METHODS: Fourteen recipients (group 1: 12 men, 2 women) with CSA-based immunosuppression (plus azathioprine and/or steroids) were started on 2000 mg MMF/d. Azathioprine was discontinued and CSA tapered to trough whole blood levels of 70 to 120 microg/L. Ten recipients (group 2: seven men, three women) were maintained on their CSA dosages. Creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, uric acid, urea nitrogen, and rejection were monitored. RESULTS: Mean age was 58 (range 44 to 69 years) and 48 years (range 24 to 61 years) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 1 creatinine fell from 2.7 +/- 0.8 to 1.9 +/- 0.5 mg/dL (baseline vs control 2: P =.001); uric acid and urea nitrogen remained constant. CSA levels decreased from 173 +/- 56 to 110 +/- 33 microg/L (P =.02). In group 2 creatinine (2.4 +/- 0.7 vs 2.3 +/- 0.5 mg/dL), uric acid, urea nitrogen, and CSA levels remained constant. Comparison between groups showed higher creatinine clearance (50 +/- 18 vs 29 +/- 14 mL/min; group 1 vs group 2: P =.02), lower CSA levels (110 +/- 33 vs 161 +/- 35 microg/L; P <.001) and a trend toward lower serum creatinine (1.9 +/- 0.5 vs 2.3 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, P =.077). There were two rejections >/= 1B according to ISHLT in the study and four in the control group. Two deaths occurred in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from AZA to MMF after CSA reduction improves creatinine clearance in HTX recipients and reduces serum creatinine. No negative effect on patient safety was identified by rejection rate or survival.     

Sirolimus experience in heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Sirolimus is a potent, nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressant with antiproliferative activity in nonimmune cells. Recent data support the conversion in late renal failure secondary to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), with limited experience in de novo regimens in patients with predictive factors of postoperative renal impairment. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience of sirolimus-based immunosuppression administered to 25 heart transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 25 heart transplant recipients who received sirolimus included 17 conversions due to late CNI-related chronic renal dysfunction, six patients with a de novo regimen, and two patients who developed posttransplant pulmonary neoplasms. The conversion from CNI to sirolimus was started with 2 mg, with an average time after transplantation of 78 +/- 43 months and a mean baseline serum creatinine level of 2.1 +/- 0.45 mg/dL. The mean clinical follow-up was 17 +/- 9 months postconversion, and included echocardiography and laboratory studies. In the de novo group successive endomyocardial biopsies were performed during the first semester. RESULTS: Serum creatinine fell from 2.1 +/- 0.45 mg/dL to 1.8 +/- 0.51 mg/dL (P = .012). Mean sirolimus levels were 15 +/- 9 ng/mL (doses 2.2 +/- 0.4 mg). This improvement continued until 3 months (creatinine 1.5 +/- 0.35 P < .01)/sirolimus levels 11.7 +/- 5 ng/mL [1.9 +/- 0.7 mg]), with maintenance at 6 months (1.58 +/- 0.3 mg/dL/14 +/- 4 ng/mL [1.85 +/- 0.7 mg]) and 1-year postconversion (1.53 +/- 0.39 mg/dL; P = .019/10.7 +/- 2.5 ng/mL [1.5 +/- 0.7 mg]). De novo, after a mean follow-up of 13 months (range 3 to 35), sirolimus appeared to increase the incidence of a moderate histological grade of rejection without hemodynamic compromise. Side effects were common (63%), including peripheral edema, skin eruptions, and pericardial effusion. Only one patient discontinued treatment, due to intestinal intolerance. Four patients died during follow-up: two because of lung neoplasms and two because of progressive graft vessel disease. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus improved late CNI-related chronic renal dysfunction. Kidney function was preserved using a de novo CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen for recent cardiac transplant recipients.     

Conversion of azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil and chronic graft failure progression

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of conversion from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on graft function in 35 renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The immunosuppressive regimen originally consisted of AZA, cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pr). At the onset of the study (mean period = 39 posttransplant months), a graft biopsy was performed on all patients who were randomly divided into group 1 (n = 17) in whom MMF was introduced instead of AZA. The remaining 18 subjects (group 2) were maintained on the previous regimen. Two periods were analyzed: period I: 12 months before, and period II: 12 months after biopsy and therapy conversion. Graft function was assessed monthly by measurements of the 24-hour creatinine clearance (CCr). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences in CCr and proteinuria between the two groups. No difference was observed in the baseline characteristics, in the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection, or in the mean CsA dose. Pathohistological analysis revealed advanced CAN in the majority of patients in both groups. The morphological changes negatively correlated with graft function. The graft function showed parallel deterioration in the two groups; no significant difference was observed in the mean CCr values in the periods studied. Proteinuria was similar for both groups throughout the study. Conversion of AZA to MMF in recipients with CAN, albeit safe, was without significant benefit on the progression of chronic graft failure over the period of a year.