18F alpha-methyl tyrosine PET studies in patients with brain tumors.

We have developed 18F-labeled alpha-methyl tyrosine (FMT) for PET imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical application potential of FMT for patients with brain tumors. METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers and 20 patients with brain tumors were injected with 185 MBq (5 mCi) FMT. In 3 healthy volunteers, whole-body imaging and urinary and plasma analysis were conducted for the assessment of the biodistribution of FMT. The normal range of cortical standardized uptake value (SUV) as a reference for comparing tumor SUV of FMT was estimated by using PET data obtained at 30 min postinjection in 8 healthy volunteers. Dynamic PET scans were conducted for 100 min in 4 healthy volunteers and for 30 min in 15 patients with brain tumors. The 10-min static images in another 4 volunteers and all patients were obtained at 30 min postinjection. In 13 patients, FMT uptake in the brain tumor was compared with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Tumor-to-normal cortex count (T/N) ratio and tumor-to-white matter count (T/W) ratio and SUVs of brain tumors were determined on FMT and FDG PET images. RESULTS: Approximately 1480 MBq (40 mCi) FMT were produced in one radiosynthesis. Percentage injected dose (%ID) of FMT in the brain ranged from 2.8% to 4.9%, and approximately 50%ID of FMT was excreted in urine during 60 min postinjection, of which 86.6% was unmetabolized FMT. A faint physiological brain uptake with SUV of 1.61 +/- 0.32 (mean +/- SD, n = 8) was observed in healthy volunteers. Tumor SUV of FMT ranged from 1.2 to 8.2, with mean value of 2.83 +/- 1.57 (n = 23), which was significantly higher than that of the cortical area in healthy volunteers (P < 0.01). T/N and T/W ratios of FMT were significantly higher than those of FDG (2.53 +/- 1.31 versus 1.32 +/- 1.46, P < 0.001; 3.99 +/- 2.10 versus 1.39 +/- 0.65, P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: FMT, like other radiolabeled amino acids, can provide high-contrast PET images of brain tumors.     

PET imaging of brain astrocytoma with 1-11C-acetate

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the use of 1-¹¹C-acetate (ACE) as a metabolic tracer for the detection and characterisation of astrocytomas. Methods Positron emission tomography (PET) studies with ACE and 2-¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) were performed sequentially in 26 patients with primary astrocytomas. Images were analysed by visual interpretation and determination of the tumour to cortex ratio (T/C ratio) and standardised uptake value (SUV). The tumour uptake was visually scored into three grades as compared with the contralateral cortex: clearly lower (–), almost equal (+) and clearly higher (++). Results There were 85% of astrocytomas with ++ ACE uptake, 15% with + ACE uptake and none with – ACE uptake. Only 19% of astrocytomas had ++ FDG uptake. Thirty-seven percent of high-grade astrocytomas had + FDG uptake and 37% had – FDG uptake. The sensitivity and specificity of the FDG T/C ratio in discriminating high-grade from low-grade astrocytomas were 79% and 100%, respectively, at the cutoff value of 0.75. Using 2.33 as the cutoff value of the ACE T/C ratio, the sensitivity and specificity were 42% and 86%, respectively. FDG was better than ACE in discriminating high-grade from low-grade astrocytomas. T/C ratios and SUVs of FDG uptake of tumours correlated with the histological grades, but those of ACE uptake did not. Conclusion ACE appears to be a promising tracer for use in the detection of primary astrocytomas, but is of limited value in the differentiation of high- and low-grade astrocytomas. ACE is complementary to FDG for the diagnosis and characterisation of astrocytoma.     

FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions

PURPOSE: To evaluate the standardized uptake value (SUV) of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) at positron emission tomography (PET) in the differentiation of benign from malignant bone lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two (19 malignant, 33 benign) primary bone lesions were examined with FDG PET prior to tissue diagnosis. The SUVs were calculated and compared between benign and malignant lesions and among histologic subgroups that included more than four cases. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in SUV between benign (2.18 +/- 1.52 [SD]) and malignant (4.34 +/- 3.19) lesions in total (P =.002). However, giant cell tumors (n = 5; SUV, 4.64 +/- 1.05) showed significantly higher SUV than chondrosarcomas (n = 7; SUV, 2.23 +/- 0.74) (P =.036, adjusted for multiple comparisons) and had no statistically significant difference in SUV compared with osteosarcomas (n = 6; SUV, 3.07 +/- 0.96) (P =.171). There was no statistically significant difference in SUV between fibrous dysplasias (n = 6; SUV, 2.05 +/- 0.98) and osteosarcoma (P =.127) or chondrosarcomas (P =.667). Although the number of cases was small, three chondroblastomas, one sarcoidosis, and one Langerhans cell histiocytosis showed levels of FDG accumulation as high as that of osteosarcomas. CONCLUSION: Radiologists should be aware of the high accumulation of FDG in some benign bone lesions, especially histiocytic or giant cell-containing lesions. Consideration of histologic subtypes should be included in analysis of SUV at FDG PET of primary bone tumors.     

Evaluation of intraoperative radiation therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer with FDG PET.

This investigation was undertaken to evaluate 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in monitoring patients after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for unresectable pancreatic cancer and to compare its usefulness with CT. METHODS: FDG PET was performed in 12 consecutive unresectable ductal adenocarcinoma patients before (n = 12) and after IORT (0.7-11.9 mo, n = 14). In the follow-up period, FDG PET results after IORT were divided into three groups: early (0-2.0 mo after IORT, n = 7), intermediate (2.1-4.0 mo, n = 5) and delayed period (4.1 mo or later, n = 2). FDG uptake at 60 min after injection of 185 MBq FDG under fasting conditions was analyzed with standardized uptake value (SUV). Three parameters, the highest SUV in the tumor, the area of tumor showing SUV of more than 2.0 and the average SUV in the tumor area were calculated. Ratios of each parameter after IORT to that before IORT were defined as residual uptake ratio (RUR)-1, -2 and -3, respectively. Tumor regression after IORT was evaluated with CT as tumor size ratio (TSR) every 2 mo. RESULTS: Results of RUR-1 and -3 were consistent with tumor size measured by CT. They decreased in 10 patients with partial response and increased in 2 patients with no change, although these 2 patients had abscesses. RUR-3 decreased consistently as 0.65+/-0.33 in 2 mo, 0.51+/-0.39 in 4 mo and 0.24 in 4 mo or later after IORT, respectively. RUR-1 decreased in early period, but demonstrated no change through the remaining periods. There were discrepancies between the results of RUR-2 and those of the other RURs. CT results revealed a slow decrease in tumor size, because TSR was 0.91 +/-0.10, 0.76+/-0.11 and 0.70+/-0.18 in 2, 4 and 6 mo after IORT, respectively. RUR-3 was smaller than TSR at 2 mo (P < 0.05) and 4 mo (P = 0.056). These results indicate that the measurement of the average SUV in the tumor area with FDG PET could evaluate the local response of pancreatic cancer after IORT earlier and more markedly than with CT. CONCLUSION: FDG PET was useful in monitoring patients after IORT, because the decrease of metabolism in pancreatic tumor could be detected earlier than the decrease in tumor size.     

Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.

3'-Deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) is a recently developed PET tracer to image tumor cell proliferation. We characterized (18)F-FLT PET of brain gliomas and compared (18)F-FLT with (18)F-FDG PET in side-by-side studies of the same patients. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated glioma underwent PET with (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG on consecutive days. Three stable patients in long-term remission were included as negative control subjects. Tracer kinetics in normal brain and tumor were measured. Uptake of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG was quantified by the standardized uptake value (SUV) and the tumor-to-normal tissue (T/N) ratio. The accuracy of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG PET in evaluating newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas was compared. More than half of the patients underwent resection after the PET study and correlations between PET uptake and the Ki-67 proliferation index were examined. Patients were monitored for a mean of 15.4 mo (range, 12-20 mo). The predictive power of PET for tumor progression and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS: (18)F-FLT uptake in tumors was rapid, peaking at 5-10 min after injection and remaining stable up to 75 min. Hence, a 30-min scan beginning at 5 min after injection was sufficient for imaging. (18)F-FLT visualized all high-grade (grade III or IV) tumors. Grade II tumor did not show appreciable (18)F-FLT uptake and neither did the stable lesions. The absolute uptake of (18)F-FLT was low (maximum-pixel SUV [SUV(max)], 1.33) but image contrast was better than with (18)F-FDG (T/N ratio, 3.85 vs. 1.49). (18)F-FDG PET studies were negative in 5 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma who subsequently suffered tumor progression within 1-3 mo. (18)F-FLT SUV(max) correlated more strongly with Ki-67 index (r = 0.84; P < 0.0001) than (18)F-FDG SUV(max) (r = 0.51; P = 0.07). (18)F-FLT uptake also had more significant predictive power with respect to tumor progression and survival (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Thirty-minute (18)F-FLT PET 5 min after injection was more sensitive than (18)F-FDG to image recurrent high-grade tumors, correlated better with Ki-67 values, and was a more powerful predictor of tumor progression and survival. Thus, (18)F-FLT appears to be a promising tracer as a surrogate marker of proliferation in high-grade gliomas.     

FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings

Gastric cancer carries a poor prognosis and is the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In spite of the clinical importance of this tumour entity, only a few fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) studies have been published on gastric carcinomas. The aim of this study was to characterise the FDG uptake of gastric carcinomas by relating it to the histopathological properties of the tumours. Within this context, we focussed particularly on the microscopic growth type according to Lauren since our preliminary observations indicated low FDG accumulation in the non-intestinal growth type compared with the intestinal type. Forty patients with locally advanced gastric carcinomas and ten control subjects were studied by FDG PET (300 MBq i.v., emission scan: 40 min p.i., one bed position, measured transmission, filtered back-projection). Detectability of the tumours was qualitatively assessed by two independent observers. For quantitative analysis the regional tumour uptake was measured by standardised uptake values (SUV normalised to the body surface area) using a region of interest technique. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed with respect to the microscopic growth type according to Lauren (intestinal type vs non-intestinal type). Other histopathological characteristics were also assessed: mucus content, grading, tumour extension and tumour location. In 36 patients the survival rates were compared for detectable vs non-detectable tumours and for tumour FDG uptake above and below the median. Only 24 of the 40 locally advanced gastric carcinomas (60%) were detected by FDG PET. The detection rate for tumours of the intestinal type was significantly higher than that for tumours of the non-intestinal type (83% vs 41%, P=0.01). Only 2/18 intestinal type tumours contained extracellular or intracellular mucus whereas 17/22 non-intestinal tumours did so (P<0.01). The mean SUV was significantly different between the intestinal type and the non-intestinal type (6.7+/-3.4 vs 4.8+/-2.8, P=0.03), between non-mucus-containing tumours and mucus-containing tumours (7.2+/-3.2 vs 3.9+/-2.1, P<0.01) and between grade 2 tumours and grade 3 tumours (7.4+/-2.3 vs 5.2+/-3.3, P=0.02). The survival rate was not significantly different in patients with detectable tumours on FDG PET and patients with non-detectable tumours (P=0.85). It is concluded that advanced malignant tumours with a poor prognosis may show low FDG uptake due to special histopathological characteristics. The overall low detection rate of gastric carcinomas is attributable to the frequent occurrence of diffusely growing and mucus-containing tumour types. This may limit the value of FDG PET for diagnosis and therapy monitoring in patients with gastric carcinomas. Furthermore, the intensity of tumour FDG uptake is not predictive of survival in gastric carcinomas.     

F-18 FDG PET/CT in the management of thyroid cancer

PURPOSE: There are approximately 32,000 new cases of thyroid carcinoma annually in the United States. F-18 FDG PET/CT has an established role in cancer management, including thyroid cancer, usually in patients who are thyroglobulin (Tg) positive/iodine negative. We reviewed our experience with F-18 FDG PET/CT in thyroid cancer, with an emphasis on correlation with Tg, and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV). We also analyzed the role of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) on PET/CT results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study (January 2003 to December 2006) of 76 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, who had F-18 FDG PET/CT scans. There were 44 women and 32 men, with age range of 20 to 81 years (average, 51.1 +/- 18.1). The administered doses of F-18 FDG ranged from 396 to 717 MBq (15.8-19.4 mCi) (average, 566 +/- 74.8) (15.3 +/- 2). Reinterpretation of the imaging studies for accuracy and data analysis from medical records were performed. RESULTS: A total of 98 PET/CT scans were analyzed (59 patients had 1 scan, 12 patients had 2, and 5 patients had 3). PET/CT was 88.6% sensitive (95% CI: 78.-94.3) and 89.3% specific (95% CI: 71.9-97.1). Mean Tg level was 1203 ng/mL (range, 0.5-28,357) in patients with positive PET/CT and 9.72 ng/mL (range, 0.5-123.0) in patients with negative PET/CT scans (P = 0.0389). Mean SUV max was 10.8 (range, 2.5-32) in the thyroid bed recurrence/residual disease and 7.53 (range, 2.5-26.2) in metastatic lesions (P = 0.0114). Mean SUV max in recurrent/residual disease in patients with TSH 30 mIU/L was 8.1 (range, 2.6-32) (P = 0.2994). CONCLUSION: F-18 FDG PET/CT had excellent sensitivity (88.6%) and specificity (89.3%) in this patient population. Metastatic lesions were reliably identified, but were less F-18 FDG avid than recurrence/residual disease in the thyroid bed. TSH levels at the time of PET/CT did not appear to impact the FDG uptake in the lesions or the ability to detect disease. In the setting of high or rising levels of Tg, our study confirms that it is indicated to include PET/CT in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.     

11C-choline PET for the detection of bone and soft tissue tumours in comparison with FDG PET

We assessed and compared the usefulness of C-choline positron emission tomography (PET) with that of 2-[ F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET for the differentiation between benign and malignant bone and soft tissue tumours. A total of 43 patients with 45 lesions were included. C-choline PET and FDG PET were performed from 5 and 40 min, respectively, after injection of 275-370 MBq tracer. PET data were evaluated by using the standardized uptake value (SUV) and were analysed according to the pathological data. C-choline uptake in malignancies was 4.9+/-2.1 (n=14), which was significantly higher than that in benign lesions (2.5+/-1.7, n=31) (P <0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of C-choline PET were 100%, 64.5% and 75.6%, respectively, when 2.59 of the SUV was used as the cut-off value. The FDG uptake in malignancies was 5.1+/-4.2 (n=14) and was also significantly larger than that in benign lesions 2.9+/-2.9 (n=31) (P<0.003). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG PET were 85.7%, 41.9% and 55.6%, respectively (cut-off=1.83). The C-choline uptake in the lesions correlated with FDG uptake ( r=0.61, P<0.003). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve for C-choline PET (area=0.847) was higher than that for FDG PET (area=0.717). This study showed that C-choline PET was superior to FDG PET in differentiation between malignant and benign lesion in bone and soft tissue tumours. C-choline PET might be useful as a screening method for malignant bone and soft tissue tumours.     

Imaging prostate cancer with 11C-choline PET/CT.

The ability of 11C-choline and multimodality fusion imaging with integrated PET and contrast-enhanced CT (PET/CT) was investigated to delineate prostate carcinoma (PCa) within the prostate and to differentiate cancer tissue from normal prostate, benign prostate hyperplasia, and focal chronic prostatitis. METHODS: All patients with PCa gave written informed consent. Twenty-six patients with clinical stage T1, T2, or T3 and biopsy-proven PCa underwent 11C-choline PET/CT after intravenous injection of 1,112 +/- 131 MBq 11C-choline, radical retropubic prostatovesiculectomy, and standardized prostate tissue sampling. Maximal standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 11C-choline within 36 segments of the prostate were determined. PET/CT results were correlated with histopathologic results, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and pT stage. RESULTS: The SUV of 11C-choline in PCa tissue was 3.5 +/- 1.3 (mean +/- SD) and significantly higher than that in prostate tissue with benign histopathologic lesions (2.0 +/- 0.6; P < 0.001 benign histopathology vs. cancer). Visual and quantitative analyses of segmental 11C-choline uptake of each patient unambiguously located PCa in 26 of 26 patients and 25 of 26 patients, respectively. A threshold SUV of 2.65 yielded an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.89 +/- 0.01 for correctly locating PCa. The maximal 11C-choline SUV did not correlate significantly with PSA or Gleason score but did correlate with T stage (P = 0.01; Spearman r = 0.49). CONCLUSION: 11C-Choline PET/CT can accurately detect and locate major areas with PCa and differentiate segments with PCa from those with benign hyperplasia, chronic prostatitis, or normal prostate tissue. The maximal tumoral 11C-choline uptake is related to pT stage.     

Solitary brain lesions enhancing at MR imaging: evaluation with fluorine 18 fluorocholine PET

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine whether differences between benign and malignant brain lesions can be depicted with fluorine 18 ((18)F) fluorocholine positron emission tomography (PET). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (14 women, 16 men; age range, 26-79 years) with solitary brain lesions that were enhanced at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging underwent whole-brain (18)F-fluorocholine PET after giving informed consent in this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Histopathologic diagnoses were made in 24 cases (13 high-grade gliomas, eight metastases to the brain, and three benign lesions). In six cases, benign lesions were diagnosed on the basis of longitudinal follow-up MR findings. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) for lesion and peritumoral regions was measured on PET images, and a lesion-to-normal tissue uptake ratio (LNR) was calculated. Differences were assessed with one-way analysis of variance, Fisher exact, and Student t tests. RESULTS: Differences in SUV(max) between high-grade gliomas (1.89 +/- 0.78 [mean +/- standard deviation]), metastases (4.11 +/- 1.68), and benign lesions (0.59 +/- 0.31) were significant (P < .0001). LNRs also differed significantly (5.15 +/- 2.51, 10.91 +/- 2.14, and 1.28 +/- 0.32, respectively; P < .0001). These differences were also significant at pairwise analysis. The peritumoral LNR exceeded 2.0 in seven high-grade gliomas and no metastases (P = .02). In 14 radiation-treated patients, the lesions classified as benign demonstrated significantly less uptake compared with the recurrent tumors (SUV(max): 0.72 +/- 0.38 vs 2.27 +/- 1.24, P < .01; LNR: 1.36 +/- 0.43 vs 5.88 +/- 3.66, P < .01). CONCLUSION: High-grade gliomas, metastases, and benign lesions can be distinguished on the basis of measured fluorocholine uptake. Increased peritumoral fluorocholine uptake is a distinguishing characteristic of high-grade gliomas.     

A comparative study of 11C-choline PET and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the evaluation of lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET imaging in the detection of primary lung cancer and mediastinal lymph node metastases. Seventeen patients with histologically proven primary lung cancer were examined with both 11C-choline and FDG PET within a week of each study. Lung cancers were analysed visually and semiquantitatively using the ratio of tumour-to-normal radioactivity (T/N ratio) and standardized uptake value (SUV). Mediastinal lymph node metastases were analysed visually. Although both techniques delineated focal lesions with an increase in tracer accumulation in 13 patients, FDG PET identified three additional patients in whom 11C-choline PET did not visualize any lesion. In the detection of lung cancer <2 cm in size, FDG PET provided higher sensitivity (six of seven, 85.7%) than 11C-choline PET (four of seven, 57.1%). The T/N ratio and SUV were significantly higher with FDG PET (T/N ratio, 7.43+/-6.22; SUV, 4.05+/-3.05) than these were with 11C-choline PET (T/N ratio, 2.93+/-1.19; SUV, 2.93+/-0.79) (P<0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the T/N ratios and SUVs of FDG and 11C-choline. In the assessment of mediastinal lymph node involvement, FDG PET detected lymph node metastases in two patients who were negative on 11C-choline PET, whereas both techniques could not detect tumour involvement in one patient. Both techniques have clinical value for the non-invasive detection of primary lung cancer that is 2 cm or greater in size. However, FDG PET is superior to 11C-choline PET in the detection of lung cancer that is less than 2 cm in diameter and in mediastinal lymph node metastases.     

18F-FDG hybrid PET in patients with suspected spondylitis

This study investigated the value of fluorine-18 2'-deoxy-2-fluoro- D-glucose (FDG) imaging with a double-headed gamma camera operated in coincidence (hybrid PET) detection mode in patients with suspected spondylitis. Comparison was made with conventional nuclear medicine imaging modalities and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sixteen patients with suspected spondylitis (nine male, seven female, mean age 59 years) prospectively underwent FDG hybrid PET (296 MBq) and MRI. For intra-individual comparison, the patients were also imaged with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) (555 MBq) ( n=13) and/or gallium-67 citrate (185 MBq) ( n=11). For FDG hybrid PET, two or three transverse scans were performed. Ratios of infected (target) to non-infected (background) (T/B) vertebral bodies were calculated. MR images were obtained of the region of interest. Patients found positive for spondylitis with MRI and/or FDG hybrid PET underwent surgical intervention and histological grading of the individual infected foci. Twelve out of 16 patients were found to be positive for spondylitis. Independent of the grade of infection and the location in the spine, all known infected vertebrae ( n=23, 9 thoracic, 12 lumbar, 2 sacral) were detected by FDG hybrid PET. T/B ratios higher than 1.45+/-0.05 (at 1 h p.i.) were indicative of infectious disease, whereas ratios below this value were found in cases of degenerative change. FDG hybrid PET was superior to MRI in patients who had a history of surgery and suffered from a high-grade infection in combination with paravertebral abscess formation ( n=2; further computed tomography was needed) and in those with low-grade spondylitis ( n=2, no oedema) or discitis ( n=2, mild oedema). False-positive 67Ga citrate images ( n=5: 2 spondylodiscitis, 1 aortitis, 1 pleuritis, 1 pulmonary tuberculosis) and 99mTc-MDP SPET ( n=4: 1 osteoporosis, 2 spondylodiscitis, 1 fracture) were equally well detected by FDG hybrid PET and MRI. No diagnostic problems were seen in the other patients ( n=5). In this study, FDG hybrid PET was superior to MRI, 67Ga citrate and (99m)Tc-MDP, especially in patients with low-grade spondylitis (as compared with MRI), adjacent soft tissue infections (as compared with 67Ga citrate) and advanced bone degeneration (as compared with 99mTc-MDP).     

Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET imaging for the detection of recurrent or metastatic gynecologic cancer

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the diagnostic role and accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) for the detection of tumor foci in patients with suspected recurrent or metastatic lesions of gynecologic cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FDG PET imaging was performed on 51 patients with a previous history of gynecologic cancer who were referred for a clinical suspicion of recurrent disease. PET acquisition was started 50-60 min after the intravenous injection of 5-6 MBq/kg FDG in all patients. The PET images were interpreted visually, and tracer uptake was quantitated as the standardized uptake value adjusted to body weight (SUV) in the lesions showing FDG uptake. The accuracy of the PET results was assessed by a consensual verdict based on histology, cytology, other imaging and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: FDG PET correctly diagnosed 33 of 36 patients with recurrent disease and 12 of 15 patients without recurrence. On patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG PET were 91.7%, 80.0% and 88.2%, respectively, depending on the selected scheme for visual scoring of the lesions. The area index in receiver-operating characteristic analysis was 0.95 for patient detection. Malignant lesions accumulated significantly more FDG than the benign ones (the mean SUVs were 3.7 +/- 1.9 and 1.6 +/- 1.1, respectively, p = 0.004). The sensitivity and specificity in correct identification of tumor recurrence or metastases using a threshold SUV 1.9 were 88.8% and 66.7% in contrast to the visual analysis (sensitivity 96.4%, specificity 50%) on a lesion-based analysis. The partial volume effect of SUV in a few small lesions and the presence of bone lesions in which FDG uptake was relatively low might be the reason for the lower sensitivity in SUV analysis. FDG PET was valuable when CT/MRI was negative or inconclusive, and in patients with elevated tumor marker levels as well as with normal tumor marker levels when recurrence was suspected clinically. However, PET failed to visualize some small metastatic lesions in lung and bone, and showed falsely high FDG uptake in some benign lesions. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that FDG PET is a reliable and accurate diagnostic method for detecting recurrent or metastatic gynecologic cancer particularly lymph node metastases. Although the sensitivity of PET for detecting small metastases was relatively limited, the overall sensitivity of FDG PET was significantly higher than morphologic imaging.     

111In-labelled bleomycin complex for the differentiation of high- and low-grade gliomas

The aim of this study was to evaluate 111In-labelled bleomycin complex (111In-BLMC) SPET in the differentiation of high- and low-grade gliomas. Nineteen glioma patients, 14 with high-grade and five with low-grade tumours, were studied 1, 4 and 24 h after the injection of 111In-BLMC. In the high-grade glioma group, there was significant uptake of 111In-BLMC in 12 patients and no uptake in two patients based on the visual classification of SPET images at 4 and 24 h. In the low-grade glioma group, one patient had low uptake at 4 and 24 h, but the other four patients showed no visible uptake. The mean tumour to extracerebral circulation activity ratio (T/Cr) at 4 h was 0.13 +/- 0.10 (n = 5) in low-grade gliomas and 1.7 +/- 1.0 (n = 14) in high-grade gliomas. At 24 h the T/Cr ratios were 0.56 +/- 0.21 and 3.4 +/- 1.7, respectively. The mean tumour to contralateral normal brain activity ratios (T/Br) were 5.0 +/- 3.9 (4 h) and 3.0 +/- 2.8 (24 h) in low-grade gliomas, and 37.2 +/- 37.3 (4 h) and 8.3 +/- 8.2 (24 h) in high-grade gliomas. These higher T/Br ratios did not, however, result in improved differentiation between the two groups of gliomas; at 4 h the T/Cr and T/Br ratios were of equal value, as two high-grade gliomas would have been misclassified as low-grade, but at 24 h the T/Br ratio resulted in more misclassifications. Our results show that 111In-BLMC can be used in the differentiation of high- and low-grade gliomas and that the selection of the reference area for calculating tumour to non-tumour ratios is important.     

^13N—NH3·H2O联合^18F-FDG显像鉴别诊断原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和胶质瘤

目的探讨^13N-NH3·H2O联合^18F—FDGPET／CT显像在鉴别原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤（PCNSL）和胶质瘤中的价值。方法对2010年1月至2012年7月就诊的10例PCNSL患者[男7例,女3例,年龄43—74（59．10±12．47）岁]和15例胶质瘤患者[男8例,女7例,年龄14～72（46．73±19．61）岁]进行^13N-NH3·H2O和^18F—FDGPET／CT显像。以肿瘤与脑灰质摄取比（T／G）评价肿瘤的放射性摄取量。采用两样本t检验比较不同肿瘤对显像剂的摄取差异,通过判别函数分析两者联合的诊断效果。结果PCNSL组^18F—FDG的T／G值明显高于胶质瘤组,分别为3．27±1．21和1．57±0．39（t=5．630,P〈0．001）,而PCNSL组^13N—NH3·H2O的T／G值明显低于胶质瘤组,分别为1．43±0．26和2．12±0．69（t=-3．551,P〈0．01）。相对于^13N—NH3·H2O的T／G值,所有PCNSL病灶（14个）均表现为高的^18F-FDGT／G值,而77．8％（14／18）的胶质瘤病灶则显示相反的结果。利用判别函数分析,2种显像剂联合对肿瘤分类的整体准确性达96．9％（31／32）,仅1例胶质瘤病灶误判为PCNSL。结论^13N-NH3·H2O联合^18F-FDG有助于鉴别PCNSL和胶质瘤。     

Quantitative assessment of truncal FDG-PET examination with postinjection transmission scan —comparison with preinjection transmission scan—

The purpose of this study was to assess the quantitative accuracy of truncal FDG PET with a postinjection transmission scan. METHODS: Ten subjects with lung cancer were recruited for this study. Prior to the emission scan, a transmission scan was performed for 10 min. All subjects received 370 MBq of intravenous administration of FDG prior to a 60-min emission scan. Immediately following the emission scan, a postinjection transmission scan was performed. Emission data from 40 to 60 min postinjection were reconstructed with either pre- or postinjection transmission data and converted to a standardized uptake value (SUV) image. On each SUV image, 5 regions of interest were placed and regions of interest on the SUV image with a postinjection transmission scan (SUVpost) were plotted against those with preinjection transmission (SUVpre), and a regression line was generated. Using the slope and Y-intercept of the regression line, percent error of estimation of the SUV was calculated based on the following equation: % error = ISUVpre - SUVpostI x 100/SUVpre. RESULTS: In the low SUV area (SUV = 1), the averaged percent error was 9.4 +/- 12.0% (mean +/- SD), whereas in the high SUV area (SUV = 10), the averaged percent error was 2.8 +/- 3.1%. The least percent error was 1.8 +/- 1.8% (SUV = 3.8) in this study. CONCLUSION: In the study on truncal FDG PET with postinjection transmisson scan, the quantitative accuracy was preserved and the method is clinically available.     

PET with FDG-labeled leukocytes versus scintigraphy with 111In-oxine-labeled leukocytes for detection of infection

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) with leukocytes labeled in vitro with (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) versus that of conventional scintigraphy with leukocytes labeled in vitro with (111)In oxine in patients suspected of having infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients were 25 men and 26 women aged 32-86 years. In vitro labeling of autologous human leukocytes with FDG and (111)In-oxine was performed according to published methods. Labeling efficiencies and cell viability were determined. Imaging was performed 2.5-5.8 hours after injection of 196-315 MBq of FDG-labeled leukocytes and approximately 24 hours after injection of 17-25 MBq of (111)In-oxine-labeled leukocytes. Forty-three (20 men, 23 women; mean age, 59 years; range, 32-86 years) patients could be successfully imaged with both tracers. Six patients were not injected with FDG-labeled leukocytes because of low labeling efficiency (<35%). Two patients were injected with FDG-labeled leukocytes but were not imaged. One reader interpreted all results as positive or negative for infection. Imaging results were compared with final diagnoses. Labeling efficiencies and cell viabilities were compared by using the paired t test. Differences between PET and scintigraphy were determined by using the McNemar test. RESULTS: For the 43 patients who were imaged with both tracers, labeling efficiency of FDG was lower than that of (111)In oxine (72% +/- 8 [standard deviation] vs 90% +/- 5, P < .001). Viability of FDG-labeled leukocytes was not different from that of (111)In-oxine-labeled leukocytes (98% +/- 1 vs 97% +/- 3). There were no differences between FDG PET and (111)In scintigraphy in terms of sensitivity (87% vs 73%), specificity (82% vs 86%), or accuracy (84% vs 81%). CONCLUSION: PET with FDG-labeled leukocytes was comparable to scintigraphy with (111)In-oxine-labeled leukocytes. Further investigation in a larger population with dedicated PET or PET/computed tomography seems warranted.     

Evaluation of FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer.

Although many human cancers can be imaged by 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and PET, there is little clinical experience with FDG PET in cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of FDG PET scans on patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: FDG PET scans were performed on 21 patients with histologically proven uterine cervical cancer (17 newly diagnosed, 4 recurrence). After two levels of transmission scanning, approximately 370 MBq FDG were injected, and dynamic scans over 60 min were obtained at the level of suspected tumors, followed by static scans. Postvoid scans were also obtained in 11 patients to minimize FDG activity in the urinary bladder. FDG uptake was interpreted visually and classified into 4 grades (0 = normal, 1 = probably normal, 2 = probably abnormal and 3 = definitely abnormal). For a semiquantitative index of FDG uptake in tumors, the standardized uptake value (SUV) corrected by predicted lean body mass (SUL) was calculated and compared. The detectability of lymph node metastases by PET was compared with that by CT. RESULTS: Of the 21 newly diagnosed or recurrent cancers, 16 (76%) were detected by FDG PET without use of postvoid imaging (i.e., interpreted as grade 2 or 3). The SULs of tumors ranged from 2.74-13.03, with a mean of 8.15 +/- 3.00 (SUV range 3.68-14.94, mean 10.31 +/- 3.19). There was no significant relationship between the SUL of cervical cancer and the clinical stage. Postvoid FDG PET images substantially reduced the tracer activity in the urinary bladder and improved the visualization of cervical cancers, with three additional cases detected using the postvoid images. In the 11 patients with postvoid imaging, all 11 cancers (100%) were detected. FDG PET detected lymph node metastases in 6 (86%) of 7 patients with known metastases, whereas CT was positive in 4 patients (57%), equivocal in 2 patients (29%) and negative in 1 patient (14%). All PET and CT scans were true-negative in the patients with no lymph node metastases (interpreted as grade 0 or 1 by PET, and as negative by CT). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data demonstrate the feasibility of FDG PET imaging in patients with cervical cancer. FDG PET appears to be promising for detecting untreated or recurrent cervical cancers and lymph node metastases, although the excreted FDG in the urine remains problematic in some cases.     

Low-grade gliomas and focal cortical developmental malformations: differentiation with proton MR spectroscopy

PURPOSE: To assess proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy in differentiating between low-grade gliomas and focal cortical developmental malformations (FCDMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with seizures and a cortical brain lesion on MR images were studied with proton MR spectroscopy. A metabolite ratio analysis was performed, and the metabolite signals in the lesion core were compared with those in the contralateral centrum semiovale and in the corresponding brain sites in 18 control subjects to separately obtain the changes in N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline-containing compounds (Cho), and creatine-phosphocreatine (Cr). Ten patients had a low-grade glioma (three, oligodendrogliomas; three, oligoastrocytomas; three, astrocytomas; and one, pilocytic astrocytoma), and eight had FCDM (five, focal cortical dysplasias and three, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors). Linear discriminant analysis and Student t test were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Loss of NAA and increase of Cho were more pronounced in low-grade gliomas than in FCDMs (NAA, -72% +/- 15 [+/- SD] vs -29% +/- 22, P <.001; Cho, 117% +/- 56 vs 21% +/- 66, P <.01). Changes in NAA and Cho helped differentiate low-grade gliomas from FCDMs, and changes in Cho and Cr helped differentiate astrocytomas from oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas. Metabolite NAA/Cho and NAA/Cr ratios helped differentiate low-grade gliomas from FCDMs but did not differentiate glioma subtypes. CONCLUSION: MR spectroscopy allows distinction between low-grade gliomas and FCDMs and between low-grade glioma subtypes. Metabolite changes are more informative than are metabolite ratios.     

Differential diagnosis of thymic tumors using a combination of 11C-methionine PET and FDG PET.

We assessed the usefulness of PET studies in making a differential diagnosis of thymic tumors by using 11C-methionine (MET) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). METHODS: We examined 31 patients with thymic tumors, including 14 patients with thymic cancer, 9 with invasive thymoma, 5 with noninvasive thymoma and 3 with thymic cysts. The histological diagnosis was confirmed by either surgery or biopsy. MET PET and FDG PET were performed in 28 and 29 patients, respectively. Both the MET and FDG uptakes were evaluated by the standardized uptake value (SUV). RESULTS: MET uptake was not substantially different among thymic cancer (4.8 +/- 1.4), invasive thymoma (4.3 +/-1.1) and noninvasive thymoma (4.5 +/- 1.2), bat MET uptake in thymic cysts (0.9 +/- 0.1) was lower than that in the other three tumors (P < 0.01). The FDG uptake in thymic cancer (7.2 +/- 2.9) was higher than that in invasive thymoma (3.8 -/+ 1.3), noninvasive thymoma (3.0 +/- 1.0) and thymic cysts (0.9) (P < 0.01). MET uptake in thymic tumors correlated with the FDG uptake (r = 0.65), whereas MET uptake in thymic cancer was lower than FDG uptake (FDG/MET ratio = 1.52 +/- 0.52) but was higher than FDG uptake in both invasive and noninvasive thymoma (FDG/ MET ratio = 0.86 +/- 0.33). To differentiate thymic cancer from thymoma, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. The area under the curve of FDG PET was 0.90, whereas the FDG/MET ratio was 0.87. CONCLUSION: The MET PET, FDG PET and the FDG/MET ratios were unable to differentiate benign thymic tumors from malignant ones, although FDG PET was considered to be useful in the differential diagnosis between thymic cancer and thymoma. Although the difference in the uptake ratio between FDG and MET suggests a different origin of the tumors, the FDG/MET ratio is not considered to be useful as a complementary method for the differential diagnosis of thymic tumors.