Hepatitis C Positive Grafts may be used in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Matched Analysis

Hepatitis C (HCV)-positive liver grafts have been increasingly used in patients with decompensated liver disease from HCV because of critical shortage of available organs. Fifty-nine recipients of HCV-positive grafts were matched to patients who received HCV-negative grafts. All recipients were transplanted for HCV liver disease. Matching variables were (1) status, (2) pre-transplant creatinine, (3) recipient age, (4) donor age, (5) warm ischemia time, and (6) year of transplantation. Both unmatched and matched analyses were performed on patient survival, graft survival, and time to HCV recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in patient, graft, or HCV recurrence-free survival between recipients of HCV-positive and HCV-negative grafts with matched and unmatched analyses (p > 0.05). The 3-year estimates of HCV disease-free survival were 12% (+/- 9%) and 19% (+/- 7%) using HCV-positive and -negative grafts, respectively. The use of HCV-positive grafts in recipients with HCV does not appear to affect patient survival, graft survival, or HCV recurrence when compared with the use of HCV-negative grafts. Our results suggest that HCV-positive grafts can be used in a HCV liver transplant recipient.     

Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model that determines patient survival outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) using readily available pretransplant variables. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The current liver organ allocation system strongly favors organ distribution to critically ill recipients who exhibit poor survival outcomes following OLT. A severely limited organ resource, increasing waiting list deaths, and rising numbers of critically ill recipients mandate an organ allocation system that balances disease severity with survival outcomes. Such goals can be realized only through the development of prognostic models that predict survival following OLT. METHODS: Variables that may affect patient survival following OLT were analyzed in hepatitis C (HCV) recipients at the authors' center, since HCV is the most common indication for OLT. The resulting patient survival model was examined and refined in HCV and non-HCV patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Kaplan-Meier methods, univariate comparisons, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were employed for analyses. RESULTS: Variables identified by multivariate analysis as independent predictors for patient survival following primary transplantation of adult HCV recipients in the last 10 years at the authors' center were entered into a prognostic survival model to predict patient survival. Accordingly, mortality was predicted by 0.0293 (recipient age) + 1.085 (log10 recipient creatinine) + 0.289 (donor female gender) + 0.675 urgent UNOS - 1.612 (log10 recipient creatinine times urgent UNOS). The above variables, in addition to donor age, total bilirubin, prothrombin time (PT), retransplantation, and warm and cold ischemia times, were applied to the UNOS database. Of the 46,942 patients transplanted over the last 10 years, 25,772 patients had complete data sets. An eight-factor model that accurately predicted survival was derived. Accordingly, the mortality index posttransplantation = 0.0084 donor age + 0.019 recipient age + 0.816 log creatinine + 0.0044 warm ischemia (in minutes) + 0.659 (if second transplant) + 0.10 log bilirubin + 0.0087 PT + 0.01 cold ischemia (in hours). Thus, this model is applicable to first or second liver transplants. Patient survival rates based on model-predicted risk scores for death and observed posttransplant survival rates were similar. Additionally, the model accurately predicted survival outcomes for HCV and non-HCV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Posttransplant patient survival can be accurately predicted based on eight straightforward factors. The balanced application of a model for liver transplant survival estimate, in addition to disease severity, as estimated by the model for end-stage liver disease, would markedly improve survival outcomes and maximize patients' benefits following OLT.     

Marginal grafts: finding the correct treatment for fatty livers

The influence of steatosis on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was evaluated in 860 liver transplantations carried out in 784 patients from October 1990 to August 2001. Donor variables considered were: age, hepatic enzymes, bilirubin, total and warm ischemia times, macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis. Recipient variables considered were: age, UNOS status, Child-Pugh score and indication for OLT. Patient and graft survival were the main outcome indicators. Macrovesicular steatosis affecting 15% or more of the hepatocytes was the only variable independently associated with shorter patient and graft survival ( P=0.0012 and 0.0028). A significantly worse prognosis was to be expected if >15% macrovesicular steatosis was associated with a total ischemia time >10 h ( P=0.048), or donor age >65 years ( P=0.016) or with HCV-positive recipients ( P=0.0014). From our study we can conclude that macrovesicular steatosis involving 15% or more of the hepatocytes identifies marginal livers. The risk of graft non-function or patient loss after OLT rises if macrovesicular steatosis >15% is associated with long ischemia time, high donor age, or HCV positivity in recipients.     

Long-term outcome of liver transplants for chronic hepatitis C: a 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of hepatitis C (HCV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in HCV-positive patients is almost universal. Severity of graft hepatitis increases during the long-term follow-up, and up to 30% of patients develop severe graft hepatitis and cirrhosis. However, there are still no clear predictors for severe recurrence. The aim of this study was to examine the 10-year outcome and risk factors for graft failure caused by HCV recurrence. METHODS: In a prospective analysis, 234 OLTs in 209 HCV-positive patients with a median age of 53 years were analyzed. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine A or tacrolimus in different protocols. Predictors for outcome were genotype, viremia, donor variables, recipient demographics, postoperative immunosuppression, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibilities. RESULTS: Actuarial 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 75.8% and 68.8%. Eighteen of 209 (8.7%) patients died because of HCV recurrence, which was responsible for 35.9% of the total 53 deaths. Significant risk factors for HCV-related graft failure in an univariate analysis were multiple steroid pulses, use of OKT3, and donor age greater than 40. However, in a multivariate analysis, multiple rejection treatments with steroids and OKT3 treatment proved to be significantly associated with HCV-related graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of causes leading to graft failure in patients with HCV showed that HCV recurrence is responsible for one of three deaths in HCV-positive patients. Rejection treatment contributed significantly to an enhanced risk for HCV-related graft loss. New antiviral treatments, as well as adapted immunosuppressive protocols, will be necessary to further improve the outcome of HCV-positive patients after liver transplantation.     

The impact of donor variables on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Morphologic characteristics of the graft have been proposed as a major contributor to the long-term outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Our objective was to determine the impact of donor variables, including donor age, donor-recipient HLA match, and type of donation (DCD vs donation after brain death [DBD]), on the outcome of OLT in 192 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Fourteen patients underwent OLT from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors and 188 from DBD donors. Mean donor age, warm ischemia time at recovery, and cold ischemia time were similar between the groups. Overall graft survival rate at 1 year (55% DCD vs 85% DBD) and 5 years (46% DCD vs 78% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0003). Similarly, patient survival rate at 1 year (62% DCD vs 93% DBD) and 5 years (62% DCD vs 82% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0295). Incidences of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and primary nonfunction were similar between the DCD and DBD groups. The incidence of liver abscess with ischemic-type biliary stricture was higher in recipients from DCD as compared with DBD (42% vs 2%). A trend toward lower graft survival was noted in recipients from donors older than 60 years of age in the HCV population (P = .07), with statistically lower patient survival (P = .02). Donor- recipient HLA matching did not appear to correlate with OLT outcome in patients with HCV. DCD donors and donors older than 60 years of age significantly impact patient and graft survival. Lower graft and patient survival in recipients from DCD donors does not appear to be related to early disease recurrence.     

Effect of nonviral factors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis C (HCV) is now the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While graft reinfection remains universal, progression to graft cirrhosis is highly variable. This study examined donor, recipient, and operative variables to identify factors that affect recurrence of HCV post-OLT to facilitate graft-recipient matching. METHODS: Retrospective review of 307 patients who underwent OLT for HCV over a 10-year period at our center. Recurrence of HCV was identified by the presence of biochemical graft dysfunction and concurrent liver biopsy showing diagnostic pathologic features. Time to recurrence was the endpoint for statistical analysis. Five donor, 6 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect recurrence were analyzed by univariate comparison and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival in the 307 study patients was 69% and 34% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Four predictive variables related to either donor or recipient characteristics were identified. Advanced donor age, prolonged donor hospitalization, increasing recipient age, and elevated recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. Examination of HLA disparity between donors and recipients demonstrated no correlation between class I or class II mismatches and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified donor and recipient characteristics that significantly predict hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. These factors are identifiable before transplant and, if considered when matching donors to HCV recipients, may decrease the incidence of HCV recurrence after OLT. A change in the current national liver allocation system would be needed to realize the full value of this benefit.     

The outcome of liver grafts procured from hepatitis C-positive donors

BACKGROUND: The growing prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the general population has resulted in an increased frequency of potential organ donors that carry the virus. The survival of grafts from HCV+ donors has not been studied in detail. METHODS: Two study populations were examined retrospectively to assess the survival of liver grafts procured from HCV+ donors. First, we evaluated the survival of all 13 HCV+ and 103 HCV- grafts that were transplanted at our institution to HCV+ recipients from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1999. In parallel, we analyzed a subset of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) liver transplant database from the same 5-year time period that was comprised of 14,195 adult patients for whom donor and recipient HCV serologies were known. Kaplan-Meier graft survival for both patient populations was calculated based on donor and recipient HCV serologic status. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed on UNOS data to identify variables independently predicting graft survival. RESULTS: For transplants performed at our institution, we found no statistically significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier graft survival of HCV+ and HCV- grafts transplanted to HCV+ recipients (P=0.68). The incidence of biopsy-proven, recurrent HCV posttransplant was similar in recipients receiving either HCV+ or HCV- grafts (4/13 vs. 18/103, chi-square P=0.211). Analysis of UNOS data revealed that the survival of HCV+ grafts in HCV+ recipients was equivalent to the survival of HCV- grafts in HCV+ recipients. Unexpectedly, the survival of grafts in HCV+ recipients in general was significantly inferior to that of grafts in HCV- recipients. Multivariate analysis of all patients found recipient but not donor HCV status to be independently predictive of graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of data from a single center and the national UNOS database suggests that transplantation of liver allografts from HCV+ donors to HCV+ recipients results in graft survival comparable to HCV- grafts transplanted to HCV+ recipients. In contrast, recipient HCV positivity is an independent predictor of graft failure compared with patients transplanted for other causes of liver disease.     

Factors differentially correlated with the outcome of liver transplantation in hcv+ and HCV- recipients

BACKGROUND: Survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is significantly poorer than for liver transplants performed for other causes of chronic liver disease. The factors responsible for the inferior outcome in HCV+ recipients, and whether they differ from factors associated with survival in HCV- recipients, are unknown. METHODS: The UNOS database was analyzed to identify factors associated with outcome in HCV+ and HCV- recipients. Kaplan-Meier graft and patient survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis were conducted on 13,026 liver transplants to identify the variables that were differentially associated with outcome survival in HCV- and HCV+ recipients. RESULTS: Of the 13,026 recipients, 7386 (56.7%) were HCV- and 5640 were HCV+. In HCV- and HCV+ recipient populations, five-year patient survival rates were 83.5% vs. 74.6% (P<0.00001) and five-year graft survival rates 80.6% vs. 69.9% (P<0.00001), respectively. In a multivariate regression model, donor age and recipient creatinine were observed to be significant covariates in both groups, while donor race, cold ischemia time (CIT), female to male transplants, and recipient albumin were independent predictors of survival of HCV- recipients. In the HCV+ cohort, recipient race, warm ischemia time (WIT), and diabetes also independently predicted graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: A number of parameters are differentially correlated with outcome in HCV- and HCV+ recipients of orthotopic liver transplantation. These findings may not only have practical implications in the selection and management of liver transplant patients, but also may shed new insight into the biology of HCV infection posttransplant.     

Transplantation of kidneys from HCV-positive donors: a safe strategy?

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is the most important cause of liver disease after renal transplantation (RT). The impact of HCV on patient and graft survival after RT remains controversial; however, the great majority of studies with large size and adequate follow-up have shown the detrimental impact of HCV on long-term patient and graft survival after RT. The use of kidneys from anti-HCV positive donors could help decrease the continuing disparity between the number of patients on the transplant waiting list and the number of patients receiving a transplant each year. Single-center experiences have suggested transplanting kidneys from anti-HCV positive donors only in anti-HCV positive dialysis patients. Such practice has not demonstrated any adverse effect on the short-term patient survival; the waiting times for RT were shortened. A better alternative seems to be a policy of transplanting kidneys from anti-HCV positive donors only in HCV RNA positive recipients. This requires HCV RNA testing of all anti-HCV positive dialysis patients awaiting RT. Matching donors and recipients for HCV genotype has been suggested; however, the assessment of donor HCV genotype is currently hampered by time constraints. Recent evidence based on large data base demonstrated that RT recipients of HCV-positive donors are at independent increased risk of mortality; unadjusted 3-year patient survival was 85% versus 93% (P=0.01) in all recipients of donor HCV-positive and HCV-negative kidneys, respectively. This was observed in all recipient subgroups including elderly and HCV-positive recipients. In the near future, rapid nucleic acid testing (NAT) of donors and recipients will allow the assessment of the HCV viremic status in order to maximize organ use. With appropriate informed consent, use of a renal graft from an HCV positive donor may be offered to an HCV infected recipient. Additional studies are needed to clarify the link between donor HCV-positive kidneys and patient mortality.     

Liver transplantation from old donors into HCV and non-HCV recipients

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver failure due to HCV-related cirrhosis is the leading indication for liver transplantation in Western countries. Inferior long-term results have been reported for liver transplantation in HCV patients, especially when marginal donor livers are utilized. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of liver transplantation from elderly donors in HCV versus non-HCV recipients. METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine patients receiving 204 liver transplantations were divided into four groups according to HCV positivity and donor age (> or <65 years). Long-term survivals were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Grafts from donors of >65 years into HCV-positive patients displayed lower patient and graft survival rates than HCV-negative cases, although macrosteatosis was more frequent (55% vs 9%, P =.02) among organs used for non-HCV cases. Moreover, HCV-positive recipients transplanted with a donor aged >65 years had significantly lower patient and graft survival (40% vs 78% [P =.01] and 40% vs 68% [P =.06], respectively) than patients receiving a liver from a younger donor. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis, although hampered by a small number of patients transplanted with an old liver, suggest that the results of liver transplantation with a donor graft >65 years of age into an HCV-positive recipient shows a worse outcome than those from younger donors. Older livers should be reserved for non-HCV cases.     

Use of hepatitis C virus-positive grafts in liver transplantation: a single-centre experience

AIM: Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of HCV(+) recipients after liver transplantation (LT) using HCV(+) donors and the interaction between donor and recipient viral strain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 21 LT performed between 1998 and 2004 using livers from HCV(+) donors in HCV(+) recipients. Two hundred thirty-seven patients with HCV cirrhosis who underwent LT with livers from HCV(-) donors were the control group. Ishak score (IS) was evaluated for all HCV(+) grafts. The considered variables included donor age, hepatic enzymes, intensive care unit stay, HCV genotype, ischemia time, recipient age, UNOS status, Child score, HCV genotype (before and 6 months after LT) and IS (after LT). We analyzed patient, graft, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: HCV(+) donors were significantly older than HCV(-) donors. The cumulative 5-year patient and graft survivals and disease free intervals were not different between groups. IS grading was more than 2/18 in two cases; the only graft with a staging score over 2/6 was retransplanted for early nonfunction. In two cases, different HCV genotypes were matched and donor strain took over the recipient strain. In one patient, donor genotyping 2a-2c took over recipient genotyping 1b and 9 months after LT recurrent hepatitis was documented, but antiviral therapy cleared HCV. CONCLUSIONS: Livers from HCV(+) donors can safely be used in HCV(+) recipients. Hepatic biopsy must always be performed; livers with bridging fibrosis should not be used. The takeover of one strain by another may change the prognosis of the patient if the predominant strain is more sensitive to antiviral therapy.     

Impact of donor, technical, and recipient risk factors on survival and quality of life after liver transplantation

HYPOTHESIS: Donor, technical, and recipient risk factors cumulatively impact survival and health-related quality of life after liver transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A total of 483 adults undergoing primary orthotopic liver transplantation between January 1, 1991, and July 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft and patient survival, Karnofsky functional performance scores, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Survey scores, and Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale scores as influenced by potential risk factors including donor age, weight, warm ischemia time, cold ischemia time (CIT), sex, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status (1 or 2A vs 2B or 3), recipient age and disease, bilirubin level, and creatinine level. RESULTS: Five-year graft survival was 72% for recipients of donors younger than 60 years and 35% for recipients of donors 60 years and older (P<.001). A CIT of 12 hours or more was associated with shorter 5-year graft survival (71% vs 58%; P = .004). Five-year graft survival for UNOS status 2B or 3 was 71% vs 60% for status 1 or 2A (P = .02). A comparable pattern was seen for patient survival in relation to donor age (P = .003), CIT (P = .005), and urgency status (P = .03). Urgent UNOS status, advanced donor age, and prolonged CIT were independently associated with shorter graft and patient survival (P<.05). Functional performance and health-related quality of life were not affected by donor, recipient, or technical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Combining advanced donor age, urgent status, and prolonged CIT adversely affects graft and patient survival, and the cumulative effects of these risk factors can be modeled to predict posttransplant survival.     

Liver transplantation from anti-hepatitis C virus-positive donors: our experience

Background

Hepatitis C (HCV) is among the most common causes of end-stage liver disease worldwide. The donor shortage leads us to consider alternative organ sources such as HCV-positive donors. The outcomes of these transplants must be evaluated thoroughly since there is universal recurrence of disease among HCV-positive liver transplant recipients.

Methods

From January 2005 to April 2011, we performed 143 liver transplants (OLT) to treat end-stage liver disease secondary to HCV infection. Thirteen patients (9,1%) received livers from HCV-positive donors. A control group consisted of 130 HCV-positive patients who underwent OLT during the same period with organs from HCV-negative donors. Donor HCV status was assessed by 2 tests: HCV antibodies and viral load. Not only recipient and graft survivals were analyzed, but also frequency, timing and severity of hepatitis recurrence.

Results

Among 143 transplants performed in HCV-positive recipients during a 6-year period from January 1, 2005, to April 30, 2011, 9.1% of patients received an organ from an anti-HCV-positive donor, 72.7% of whom showed a negative viral load. The vast majority (80%) of our patients suffered hepatitis during their follow-up, 22.4% of which were severe cases.

Conclusions

No significant difference in patient or graft survival was observed between the 2 groups. A high percentage of grafts with initial positive serology for HCV showed no viral replication. Grafts from HCV-positive donors can be considered to be a safe, effective source for liver donation.     

Analysis of clinical variables of donors and recipients with respect to short-term graft outcome in human liver transplantation

Donor and recipient factors are closely associated with graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study was performed to analyze clinical characteristics of recipients and donors, which affect 30-day graft loss after OLT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-six livers from heart-beating donors were accepted between May 1997 and June 1998 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Donor variables that were analyzed included age, sex, cold ischemia time (CIT), warm ischemia time (WIT), imported versus local procurement, cardiopulmonary arrest, serum sodium level, and dopamine dose. The recipient characteristics included native liver disease and UNOS status. Two-sided Fisher exact test and stepwise logistic regression were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty-eight grafts (15.1%) were lost within 30 days of OLT. The following factors were found to adversely affect graft survival: donor sodium > 155 mEq/L (P = .002); CIT > 12 hours (P = .002); WIT > 45 minutes (P = .002); and imported liver graft (P = .048). Logistic regression revealed that donor sodium (odds ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.05 to 8.74), CIT (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.38), WIT (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09) were independent predictors of early graft loss. CONCLUSION: Donor hypernatremia as well as warm and cold ischemia times independently affect graft outcomes in the early postoperative period after OLT. Avoidance of long preservation and correction of donor sodium level are recommended to optimize results and survival in OLT.     

Prediction of 6-month survival after liver transplantation using Cox regression

BACKGROUND: The outcome of liver transplantation (LTx) has been correlated with several donor and recipient factors. METHODS: A database of 191 consecutive LTx cases was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression statistics based on 80 variables. To avoid additional effects of late events on patient survival, the chosen endpoint was 6 months. Data were evaluated using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a difference in 1- to 6-month graft survival between patients transplanted with organs from donors older versus younger than 60 years (Breslow, P <.01). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survivals were observed between patients listed as UNOS status 3, 2B, 2A, and 1: the outcomes for UNOS status 2B versus UNOS status 2A and UNOS status 2B versus status 1 were significant (P <.05). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survival rates were found between patients with versus without sepsis (P <.05), and with versus without rejection episodes (P <.01). Cox regression analysis revealed only three of the variables to be independent prognostic predictors of graft failure: donor age; postoperative septic status; and rejection. The best mathematical multivariate Cox regression model linked donor age + donor Na + rejection + sepsis to 1- to 6-month graft survival (chi-square = 29.06, P <.001). CONCLUSION: Factors predictive of 1- to 6-month graft survival after liver transplantation include donor age; UNOS status; sepsis; and rejection.     

An analysis of pretransplantation variables associated with long-term allograft outcome in pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving primary tacrolimus (FK506) therapy.

BACKGROUND: The present study analyzes pretransplantation variables associated with long-term liver allograft survival in 278 children who underwent transplantation under primary tacrolimus (FK506) therapy at a single center between October 1989 and October 1996. METHODS: The influence of 17 pretransplantation variables on long-term liver allograft outcome was analyzed. Donor variables included age, weight, gender, and cold ischemia time. Recipient variables included age, weight, gender, original liver disease, pretransplantation waiting time, previous abdominal surgery, United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, ABO blood group, bilirubin level, prothrombin time, ammonia level, creatinine level, and reduced-size/split liver grafts. RESULTS: Overall actuarial graft survival was 79.9% at 1 year, 79.1% at 2 years, and 78.3% at 3, 4, and 5 years. Retransplantation rate was 10.8%. Pretransplantation variables with a significant adverse effect on graft survival by univariate analysis were donor age < or = 1 year (P<0.004), donor weight < or = 10 kg (P<0.003), UNOS status I and II (P<0.007), ABO type O, B, and AB (P<0.03), and reduced-size/split liver grafts (P<0.02). Pretransplantation variables significant by multivariate analysis and therefore independent predictors of inferior graft outcome were donor weight '10 kg (relative risk [RR] 2.91, confidence interval [CI] 1.53-5.51); reduced-size/split liver grafts (RR 2.53, CI 1.30-5.64); and UNOS status I (RR 2.22, CI 1.11-4.43). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving primary tacrolimus therapy have long-term graft survival rates approaching 80%. UNOS status, donor weight, and the use of reduced-size/split liver grafts are the most important factors affecting survival.     

Liver transplantation using donors older than 80 years: a single-center experience

AIM: The shortage of organs for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has forced transplantation centers to expand the donor pool by using donors traditionally labeled as "extended criteria donors." One such example is OLT using a donor with advanced age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 10 patients who received a liver graft from cadaveric donors older than 80 years. We analyzed pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics, as well as the evolution of the recipients. RESULTS: All 10 donors were older than 80 years (median age, 83.5; range, 80-93). No steatosis (>30%) was accepted in the older donor group. Medium follow-up was 19.5 months. The most frequent cause for OLT was hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (8/10 patients). We had 1 case of primary nonfunction, 1 patient died immediately after surgery because of extrahepatic complications (cardiac arrest), and 2 other patients had a severe HCV recurrence and died after 1 and 2 years from OLT, respectively. Five patients had HCV recurrence and biliary complications were present in 60% of the patients. No cases of acute or chronic rejection were described. Overall survival rates after 1 and 3 years were 80% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Old donor age is not an absolute contraindication to OLT. Liver grafts from donors older than 80 years can be used knowing that there is a high risk of postoperative complications. Furthermore, the increased risk of developing severe HCV recurrence, related to older donor age, suggests that such livers should be used in HCV-negative recipients.     

Graft and patient survival after adult live donor liver transplantation compared to a matched cohort who received a deceased donor transplantation.

Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become increasingly common in the United States and around the world. In this study, we compared the outcome of 764 patients who received LDLT in the United States and compared the results with a matched population that received deceased donor transplantation (DDLT) using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. For each LDLT recipient (n = 764), two DDLT recipients (n = 1,470), matched for age, gender, race, diagnosis, and year of transplantation, were selected from the UNOS data after excluding multiple organ transplantation or retransplantation, children, and those with incomplete data. Despite our matching, recipients of LDLT had more stable liver disease, as shown by fewer patients with UNOS status 1 or 2A, in an intensive care unit, or on life support. Creatinine and cold ischemia time were also lower in the LDLT group. Primary graft nonfunction, hyperacute rejection rates, and patient survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis were similar in both groups (2-year survival was 79.0% in LDLT vs. 80.7% in case-controls; P = .5), but graft survival was significantly lower in LDLT (2-year graft survival was 64.4% vs. 73.3%; P < .001). Cox regression (after adjusting for confounding variables) analysis showed that LDLT recipients were 60% more likely to lose their graft compared to DDLT recipients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6; confidence interval 1.1-2.5). Among hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, LDLT recipients showed lower graft survival when compared to those who received DDLT. In conclusion, short-term patient survival in LDLT is similar to that in the DDLT group, but graft survival is significantly lower in LDLT recipients. LDLT is a reasonable option for patients who are unlikely to receive DDLT in a timely fashion.     

New era of liver transplantation for hepatitis B: a 17-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variables affecting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) outcome for hepatitis B virus (HBV) in a large patient cohort over a 17-year period. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Historically, OLT for chronic HBV infection has been associated with aggressive reinfection and poor survival results. More recently, OLT outcome has been improved with the routine use of antiviral therapy with either hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) or lamivudine; however, HBV recurrence remains common. The authors studied the factors affecting HBV recurrence and outcome of transplantation, including the effects of combination viral prophylaxis with HBIg and lamivudine. METHODS: A retrospective review of 166 OLT recipients for chronic HBV over a 17-year period at a single center was performed. Median follow-up was 29 months. HBV recurrence was defined by HBsAg seropositivity after OLT. HBIg monotherapy was used in 28 (17%) patients, lamivudine monotherapy in 20 (12%), and HBIg and lamivudine combination in 89 (54%); 29 (17%) did not receive any HBV prophylaxis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was present in 43 patients (26%) and urgent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status was assigned to 27 patients (16%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that affected OLT outcome. RESULTS: Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 85.8%, 73.6%, and 71.8%, respectively. As expected, HBV recurrence-free survival rates were significantly lower than overall survival rates (76.4%, 58.7%, and 48.3%). When compared with a nontreated cohort, OLT recipients receiving combination viral prophylaxis with HBIg and lamivudine showed markedly reduced HBV recurrence rates and significantly improved 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates. By univariate estimates, patient survival was reduced in the presence of HCC, in the Asian population, and urgent candidates by UNOS classification. Graft loss rates were significantly increased in urgent OLT candidates, Asians, patients with pretransplant positive DNA, and in the presence of HCC. Factors that were significant by univariate analysis or thought to be clinically relevant were subjected to multivariate analysis. By multivariate estimates, urgent UNOS or presence of HCC adversely affected patient and graft survival rates, whereas combination prophylactic therapy strongly predicted improved patient and graft survival rates as well as recurrence-free survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Orthotopic liver transplantation for HBV under combination viral prophylaxis results in survival rates equivalent to other indications. Pretransplant viral replication, UNOS status, and the presence of HCC are all sensitive markers for posttransplantation outcome. Viral prophylactic therapy has effectively reduced HBV recurrence and prolonged survival outcomes. The combination of HBIg and lamivudine is the prophylactic regimen of choice.     

The mismatch choice in liver transplantation: a suggestion for the selection of the recipient in relation to the characteristics of the donor

Two hundred seventy-six liver transplants were retrospectively reviewed to analyze 6-month graft survival in relation to the combination of donor quality (standard donor vs nonstandard donor) and risk related to the severity of recipient liver disease low-risk, ie, United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS] status 3/2b; high-risk, ie, UNOS status 1/2a). The overall 6-month survival rate of 82% was stratified into 4 classes: (1) standard donor to low-risk recipient = 88%; (2) standard donor to high-risk recipient = 86%; (3) nonstandard donor to low-risk recipient = 84%; and (4) nonstandard donor to high-risk recipient = 67%. According to the observed graft survival in the 4 different classes, 2 simulations were performed: the "match simulation" (transplantation of all low-risk recipients using standard donors, and transplantation of all high-risk recipients using nonstandard donors), and the "mismatch simulation" (transplantation of all the high-risk patients using low-risk donors and transplantation of low-risk patients using high-risk donors). The 6-month survival rates, calculated using the match simulation, were 74% and using the mismatch simulation, 84%. The authors suggest that, in the era of marginal donors, the recipient should be selected in relation to the characteristics of the donor according to the mismatch model.