Sorafenib: A Review in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Sorafenib (Nexavar^®) is currently the only systemic agent approved for use in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its approval was based on the results of the pivotal SHARP and Sorafenib Asia-Pacific (AP) trials in Child-Pugh (CP) class A patients with advanced HCC, which showed significantly longer median overall survival (OS) and time to radiological progression (TTP) with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily than with placebo, with no significant between-group difference in the median time to symptomatic progression (TTSP). Subsequent results from real-world studies such as GIDEON also support the use of sorafenib in HCC, including in carefully selected CP class B patients, although the median OS achieved in these patients appears relatively short. Sorafenib has a well characterized tolerability and safety profile, with strategies available to prevent and manage adverse effects such as hand-foot skin reactions. In conclusion, sorafenib remains an important option for the treatment of HCC.

Open image in new window

     

Our experience of the treatment with sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

We report here the experience of the treatment with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in our department. Forty patients received the therapy of sorafenib until April 2011. Twenty seven unresectable advanced HCC, 7 lung metastasis, 6 bone metastasis, 3 abdominal lymph node metastasis, and 2 peritoneal dissemination were included. The median duration of sorafenib treatment was 197 days. Grade 3 adverse event occurred in 9 patients (22.5%), and grade 4 adverse event occurred in 1 patient (3%). The response rate and disease control rate were 5% and 55%, respectively (CR 2, PR 0, SD 20, PD 9). The median overall survival was 15.2 months, and median recurrence-free survival was 3.7 months. These results suggested that a prevention of adverse events would lead to a continued treatment with sorafenib, and could expect to have a prolonged survival in patients with advanced HCC.     

FDA Supplemental Approval Summary: Lenvatinib for the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

On August 16, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved lenvatinib (Lenvima, Eisai Inc.) for first‐line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Approval was based on an international, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, noninferiority trial (REFLECT; {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01761266","term_id":"NCT01761266"}}NCT01761266) conducted in 954 patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable HCC. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive lenvatinib (12 mg orally once daily for patients with a baseline body weight ≥60 kg and 8 mg orally once daily for patients with a baseline body weight <60 kg) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until radiological disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. REFLECT demonstrated that lenvatinib was noninferior but not statistically superior to sorafenib for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio, [HR] 0.92; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.79–1.06), with median OS of 13.6 and 12.3 months in the lenvatinib and sorafenib arms, respectively. REFLECT also demonstrated statistically significant improvements in investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57–0.77]; p < 0.001), corresponding to median PFS of 7.4 and 3.7 months and overall response rate of 24.1% vs 9.2% per modified RECIST for HCC (mRECIST) in the lenvatinib and sorafenib arms, respectively. Consistent results were observed by an independent review facility per RECISTv1.1 and per mRECIST. The most common adverse reactions observed in the lenvatinib‐treated patients (≥20%) in decreasing frequency were hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, decreased appetite, arthralgia/myalgia, decreased weight, abdominal pain, palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, proteinuria, dysphonia, hemorrhagic events, hypothyroidism, and nausea.Implications for PracticeThis article describes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration''s review of data from a single trial, REFLECT, that supported the approval of lenvatinib, as a single agent, for the first‐line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). REFLECT was an open‐label, noninferiority trial that randomized 954 patients with HCC who were ineligible for liver‐directed therapy with no prior systemic therapy for HCC to lenvatinib or sorafenib. REFLECT demonstrated that lenvatinib‐treated patients had similar survival, more responses, and longer time to progression than those receiving sorafenib. Serious side effects were more common among lenvatinib‐treated patients. Lenvatinib is an effective treatment for patients with previously untreated HCC.     

Sorafenib Continuation after First Disease Progression Could Reduce Disease Flares and Provide Survival Benefits in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Pilot Retrospective Study

Background: Sorafenib is a promising drug for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however,treatment may be discontinued for multiple reasons, such as progressive disease, adverse events, or the costof treatment. The consequences of sorafenib discontinuation and continuation are uncertain. Materials andMethods: We retrospectively analyzed 88 HCC patients treated with sorafenib from July 2007 to January 2013.Overall survival (OS), post-disease progression overall survival (pOS), and time to disease progression (TTP)were compared for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to assess the effectof important factors on OS in the overall patient population and on pOS in patients who continued sorafenibtreatment. Results: Sorafenib was discontinued and continued in 24 and 64 patients, respectively. The medianOS (355 vs 517 days respectively; p=0.015) and median post-PD OS (260 vs 317 days, respectively; p=0.020) werestatistically different between the discontinuation and continuation groups. Neither the median time to first PDnor the time to second PD were significantly different between the 2 groups. In the discontinuation group, 3 of the24 patients (12.5%) suffered disease outbreaks. In Cox proportional hazard regression analysis after correctionfor confounding factors, BCLC stage (p=0.002) and PD site (p=0.024) were significantly correlated with pOS inpatients who continued sorafenib treatment. Conclusions: Sorafenib discontinuation may cause HCC flares oroutbreaks. It is advisable to continue sorafenib treatment after first PD, particularly in patients with BarcelonaClinic Liver Cancer stage B disease or only intrahepatic PD.     

TACE联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期肝细胞性肝癌的临床研究

目的探讨经导管动脉化疗栓塞（transcatheterarterialchemoembolization,TACE）联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期肝细胞性肝癌（hepatocellularcarcinoma,HCC）的疗效及安全性。方法选择我院70例中晚期HCC患者,其中35例给予TACE联合索拉非尼治疗（观察组）,35例单纯行TACE治疗（对照组）。每4-8周根据实体瘤疗效评估标准（RECIST）行肿瘤应答评价,评估临床疗效及索拉非尼毒副反应,比较两组患者治疗后的中位生存期及中位疾病进展时间。结果观察组和对照组中位0s分别为14_8个月和8．2个月,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）,中位TIP分别为10．3个月和5．8个月,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。观察组服用索拉非尼后有27例（77．1％）患者出现毒副反应,经对症治疗后好转。结论TACE联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期HCC疗效好,不良反应可耐受,有望成为中晚期HCC的一种治疗模式。     

The Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib in Combination with TACE

Objective: Sorafenib have been shown to be effective in the treatment of advanced HCC and has been standard therapy since its release in Japan in 2009 (Llovet et al., 2008; Cheng et al., 2009). However, due to a low response rate, more aggressive combination treatment has been utilized as a multimodal strategy. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of sorafenib alone and in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of advanced HCC. Methods: All patients with unresectable advanced HCC who were prescribed sorafenib at Kanto Rosai Hospital were included in the study. Five-year overall survival (OS) rates were estimated for patients treated with sorafenib alone or in combination with TACE. Multivariate and univariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors affecting OS. Analysis using propensity score matching and inverse-probability weights were also performed. Results: A total of 46 patients were treated with sorafenib up to June 2018. The total sorafenib dose administered was higher in the TACE combination group (70900 mg vs. 24000 mg vs. with sorafenib alone), although the relative dose intensity was lower (11.7% vs. 17.6%, respectively). The 5-year survival prognosis estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method was longer in patients treated with sorafenib in combination with TACE versus sorafenib alone (36.3% vs. 7.7%). Combination with TACE was the only factor associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Among cases matched by propensity scores the hazard rate for combination with TACE was 0.067 (95% CI 0.091-1.128). Conclusion: With an array of therapeutic options currently available, it is important to determine the efficacy of different multimodal strategies, such as sorafenib combined TACE, for patients with unresectable HCC.     

mRECIST response combined with sorafenib‐related adverse events is superior to either criterion alone in predicting survival in HCC patients treated with TACE plus sorafenib

The mRECIST and dermatologic adverse events (AEs) can be used to assess the patient response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and/or sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we aimed to combine the two criteria to stratify the prognosis in patients with unresectable HCC receiving TACE plus sorafenib (TACE‐S). In total, 176 consecutive HCC patients treated with TACE‐S were enrolled. CT scans and laboratory tests were conducted pretreatment (at baseline, 5–7 days before the TACE‐S) and post‐treatment (at 1, 2 and 3 months). The radiological response was assessed according to mRECIST. Sorafenib‐related AEs were recorded every 2 weeks after oral administration, and patients with dermatologic AEs of Grade 2 or more were defined as dermatologic responders. The earliest time at which mRECIST and dermatologic responses correlated with survival was 2 months after therapy. The mRECIST‐dermatologic AE combination assessment stratified patients into three different prognoses; responders on both assessments exhibited the longest median overall survival (OS), followed by responders on one assessment and non‐responders on both assessments (30.5, 17.4 and 8.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001). Achieving the highest C‐index, the mRECIST‐dermatologic AE combination showed better performance in predicting survival than either mRECIST or dermatologic AEs alone. Furthermore, the mRECIST‐dermatologic AE combination remained a significant predictor of OS, even when the patients were stratified according to the BCLC stage, ECOG score or alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) value. This study showed that the combination of mRECIST response and dermatologic AEs is superior to either criterion used alone for predicting the survival of HCC patients treated with TACE‐S.     

Phase 2 open‐label study of single‐agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B–endemic Asian population

BACKGROUND:

The current study was a phase 2 open–label study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of single‐agent sorafenib in the treatment of advanced HCC patients in a hepatitis B–endemic Asian population.

METHODS:

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in 4‐week cycles. Tumor response was assessed every 3 cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria.

RESULTS:

Fifty‐one patients were enrolled in the study and were treated with sorafenib for at least 12 weeks. The median age was 56 years (range, 28‐79 years). Approximately 90% had hepatitis B virus–related HCC. Thirty‐six (71%) patients had underlying Child‐Pugh A cirrhosis, 13 (26%) Child‐Pugh B, and 2 (3%) Child‐Pugh C. Four (8%) patients achieved partial responses, and 9 (18%) patients had stable disease for at least 12 weeks. The median overall survival was 5 months (range, 4‐17 months). Patients without extrahepatic spread, particularly without lung metastasis (P<.01), are more likely to benefit from sorafenib treatment. The most common toxicities were diarrhea (67%), malaise (55%), and hand‐foot‐skin reaction (54%). The majority of patients had transient liver function derangement. Patients with and without underlying portal vein thrombosis had similar therapeutic benefits and likewise shared a similar treatment‐related toxicity profile with sorafenib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Single‐agent sorafenib demonstrates good efficacy and acceptable tolerability in treating an advanced HCC patient population in a hepatitis B–endemic area. The presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response to sorafenib in advanced HCC patients. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma pre-treated with sorafenib

Some patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progressing under sorafenib remain eligible for further systemic therapy. Little is known on the feasibility of systemic treatment beyond sorafenib in this setting. Consecutive HCC patients pre-treated with sorafenib received gemcitabine 1,000?mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100?mg/m2 every 14?days. Exclusion criteria included Child C cirrhosis, PS?≥?3, creatinine clearance <20?ml/min, albumin <25?g/L and bilirubin?>?54?μmol/L. Pre-treatment body composition was evaluated by CT scan to detect muscle wasting (sarcopenia). The primary evaluation criterion was safety. Secondary evaluation criteria were response rate, and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Eighteen patients (median age: 64?years, range 25-77) received a total of 90 cycles (median per patient: 4, range 1-16). Eight patients (44.4 %) had a PS of 2, 5 (27.8 %) had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis and 13 (72.2 %) had a CLIP score >3. The most frequent toxicities were thrombocytopenia (grade 2-4: n?=?7, 38.9 %) and peripheral neuropathy (grade 2-3: n?=?7, 38.9 %). The overall response rate was 18.8 % (95 % CI: 0-37.9), and another 18.8 % of patients had stable disease. The median PFS and OS were 3.2 (95 % CI: 2.3-3.9) and 4.7 (95 % CI: 3.8-8.1) months, respectively. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients without sarcopenia [10.0?months (95 % CI: 7.0-13.8) vs. 3.0?months (95 % CI: 2.5-3.9), p?相似文献   

Traitement systémique du carcinome hépatocellulaire

Systemic cytotoxic treatments provide marginal benefit in unresectable or metastatic HCC. With the arrival of molecularly targeted agents, there has been renewed interest in developing novel systemic treatments for HCC. For the first time, results of a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial were recently presented in which sorafenib demonstrated improved survival in patients with advanced HCC. Therefore, sorafenib is now the new standard for the first-line treatment of advanced HCC. The identification of predictive factors and the search for new molecules remain major challenges for this poor prognostic disease.     

Evaluation of the mRECIST and α-Fetoprotein Ratio for Stratification of the Prognosis of Advanced-Hepatocellular-Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sorafenib

Objective: To compare the assessment of response and prognosis of patients to sorafenib treatment by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST (mRECIST), α-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP). Methods: Sixty-six patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib were enrolled in this retrospective study. The response to treatment was evaluated by RECIST, mRECIST and changes in AFP and DCP. Results: The median survival time of all patients was 8.6 months. The median time to radiological progression was 3.3 months. The response rates [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] by RECIST and mRECIST were 3.0 and 9.0%, respectively, while the disease control rates [CR + PR + stable disease (SD)] were 50 and 50%, respectively. Assessment by mRECIST of overall survival provided a better stratification of the patients according to the response to treatment (p = 0.009) than RECIST (p = 0.09). Assessment of overall survival by a change in AFP ratio of ≤1 at 8 weeks was better than that of >1 at 8 weeks (p = 0.002). The DCP ratio was not useful for assessment of overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified mRECIST response (CR + PR + SD; p = 0.001), AFP ratio at 8 weeks (≤1; p = 0.046) and Child-Pugh A before treatment (p = 0.012) as significant and independent determinants of survival. The combination of AFP ratio at 8 weeks, assessment by mRECIST and Child-Pugh score before treatment allows stratification of prognosis of patients treated with sorafenib. Conclusion: The combination of mRECIST and AFP ratio is useful for the assessment of prognosis of patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib.     

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib or atezolizumab alone for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUNDDespite the use of current standard therapy, the prognosis of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poor, with median survival times of 40 mo for intermediate HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] stage B) and 6–8 mo for advanced HCC (BCLC stage C). Although patients with early-stage HCC are usually suitable for therapies with curative intention, up to 70% of patients experience relapse within 5 years. In the past decade, the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved different immunogenic treatment options for advanced HCC, the most common type of liver cancer among adults. Nevertheless, no treatment is useful in the adjuvant setting. Since 2007, the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib has been used as a first-line targeted drug to address the increased mortality and incidence rates of HCC. However, in 2020, the IMbrave150 trial demonstrated that combination therapy of atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) and bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]) is superior to sorafenib, a single anti-programmed death 1/PD-L1 antibody inhibitor used as an anti-cancer monotherapy for HCC treatment.AIMTo conduct a systematic literature review to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab/bevacizumab as preferred first-line drug therapy over the conventional sorafenib or atezolizumab monotherapies, which are used to improve survival outcomes and reduce disease progression in patients with unresectable HCC and non-decompensated liver disease. METHODSA comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, clinicaltrials.gov, PubMed Central, Embase, EuropePMC, and CINAHL databases to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria using relevant MeSH terms. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and risk of bias (RoB) were assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and Sevis.RESULTSIn the atezolizumab/bevacizumab group, an improvement in overall tumor response, reduction of disease progression, and longer progression-free survival were observed compared to monotherapy with either sorafenib or atezolizumab. Hypertension and proteinuria were the most common adverse events, and the rates of adverse events were comparable to those with the monotherapy. Of the studies, there were two completed trials and two ongoing trials analyzed using high quality and low bias. A more thorough analysis was only performed on the completed trials.CONCLUSIONTreatment of HCC with atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination therapy was confirmed to be an effective first-line treatment to improve survival in patients with unresectable HCC and non-decompensated liver disease compared to monotherapy with either sorafenib or atezolizumab.     

Sorafenib plus octreotide is an effective and safe treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: multicenter phase II So.LAR. study

Purpose

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not eligible for local therapies has limited chances of cure. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with proven activity in advanced HCC. Octreotide is used in this setting with conflicting results. Treatment with sorafenib and long-acting octreotide was tested in advanced HCC to evaluate safety and activity.

Methods

Fifty patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A or B, received sorafenib at a dosage of 800 mg/day for 28 days with a following week of rest and long-acting octreotide at a dose of 40 mg, administered every 28 days.

Results

All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. Sixteen patients out of 50 (34%) were naïve from other therapies, while all the others were previously treated with local and/or systemic treatments. We achieved 5 partial responses (10%), 33 stable diseases (66%) and 12 progressions of disease (24%). Median time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.0–10.9 months), and median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI, 6.3–17.4 months). Treatment was well tolerated. Diarrhoea (6%) and hypertension (4%) were the most frequent grade 3 toxicities.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the combination between sorafenib and long-acting octreotide is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC and could represent another efficacious chance for the management of this population.     

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): from bench to bedside

Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer mortality. For patients with early resectable disease, surgical resection or transplantation is considered a potentially curative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); on the other hand, for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, treatment is essentially palliative and prior to the approval of sorafenib, there was no globally approved systemic treatment for patients presenting with unresectable or metastatic HCC. Sorafenib is the only systemic treatment to demonstrate a statistically significant but modest overall survival benefit in a large phase III trial. Thus, novel systemic approaches represent a high unmet medical need in advanced HCC. In this review article, we will try to take a journey through the history of systemic therapeutic options for HCC passing through the current standard options and exploring the potential new systemic options for this disease.     

阿昔替尼与索拉非尼一线治疗晚期肾癌的临床疗效

目的:比较阿昔替尼与索拉非尼一线治疗晚期肾癌的临床疗效,探讨分子靶向药物阿昔替尼能否作为一线治疗晚期肾癌的优选药物.方法:选取海口市人民医院肿瘤科60例晚期肾癌患者,以数字表法随机分为试验组和对照组,每组30例.实验组给予阿昔替尼,对照组给予索拉非尼治疗,比较两组患者的DCR、ORR、PFS、OS及不良反应的差异.结果:两组患者均能完成试验并进行结果评价.试验组和对照组的DCR分别为83.33％和80.00％、ORR分别为20.00％和20.00％,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05);试验组和对照组的中位PFS分别为12.8个月和10.1个月,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);中位OS分别为22.2个月和22.8个月,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).两组患者不良反应发生率相近,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),主要表现在高血压、全身反应、手足皮肤综合征、消化道反应、肝功能损害,未见严重不良反应.结论:分子靶向药物阿昔替尼较索拉非尼一线治疗晚期肾癌更能延长患者中位PFS,两药治疗后患者的DCR、ORR、OS及不良反应相似,阿昔替尼可以作为一线治疗晚期肾癌的优选.     

A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab (a human agonistic monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1) in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients and MethodsPatients with advanced HCC (stratified by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) were randomized 1:1 to receive sorafenib (400 mg, twice daily per 21-day cycle) and either placebo (placebo–sorafenib arm) or mapatumumab (30 mg/kg on day 1 per 21-day cycle; mapatumumab–sorafenib arm). The primary end point was time to (radiologic) progression (TTP), assessed by blinded independent central review. Key secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response.ResultsIn total, 101 patients were randomized (placebo–sorafenib arm: N = 51; mapatumumab–sorafenib arm: N = 50). There was no significant difference in median TTP between both arms [5.6 versus 4.1 months, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio (one-sided 90% confidence interval) 1.192 (0–1.737)]. No mapatumumab-related benefit was identified when TTP was evaluated in the stratified subgroups. The addition of mapatumumab to sorafenib did not demonstrate improvement in the secondary efficacy end points. The reported frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was comparable in both treatment arms.ConclusionsThe addition of mapatumumab to sorafenib did not improve TTP or other efficacy end points, nor did it substantially change the toxicity profile of sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Based on these results, further development of the combination of mapatumumab and sorafenib in HCC is not planned.     

Early Skin Toxicity as a Predictive Factor for Tumor Control in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sorafenib

Introduction.

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets Raf kinase and receptor tyrosine kinases and has led to a longer median overall survival (OS) time and time to progression (TTP) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was conducted to assess the link between the antitumor efficacy of sorafenib and its early cutaneous side effects in advanced HCC patients.

Materials and Methods.

All patients received 800 mg daily of sorafenib until progression or unacceptable toxicities. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of rash and hand–foot skin reactions (HFSR) during the first month of treatment, comparing tumor control (partial response plus stable disease) and TTP.

Results.

Sixty-five HCC patients treated with sorafenib were included in this analysis: 47 (73.3%) received sorafenib after failure of some local treatment, whereas 18 (27.7%) received it as first-line treatment. Twenty-nine patients developed at least grade 1 skin toxicity (rash, 13; HFSR, 16). In patients who developed skin toxicity, the tumor control rate was 48.3%, versus 19.4% in patients without cutaneous side effects. The median TTP was 8.1 months in the group of patients with skin toxicity versus 4.0 months in those without skin toxicity. This difference was also statistically significant on multivariate analysis. A borderline statistically significant difference was also observed in terms of OS in patients with early skin toxicity.

Conclusions.

Skin toxicity should be closely monitored in HCC patients treated with sorafenib in relation to its potential role as a surrogate marker of efficacy.     

Prognostic impact of pERK in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib

Background

Sorafenib represents the standard of care targeted therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, biomolecules that predict a patient's response to sorafenib treatment for HCC remain largely unknown. Thus, this study was designed to investigate whether phosphorylated ERK (pERK) and members of the sorafenib target or PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway predict the efficacy of sorafenib in advanced HCC patients.

Methodology

From December 2008 to October 2011, pathological specimens from 54 advanced HCC patients received sorafenib treatment were obtained. Clinicopathological variables, treatment response, survival and time to progression (TTP) were recorded. Immunophenotypical analysis was carried out using antibodies against pERK, phosphorylated S6K (pS6K), VEGFR2 and PTEN.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) and TTP were 14.2 and 3.4 months, respectively, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 59.3%. Better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (95% CI: 3.27–4.93 m vs. 1.15–2.85 m, p = 0.01), Child–Pugh class A score (95% CI: 3.47–4.53 vs. 1.14–2.06 m, p < 0.01), and higher pERK (3.34–6.66 m vs. 1.33–2.67 m, p = 0.03) and VEGFR2 (3.49–6.52 m vs. 2.15–2.73 m, p = 0.04) immunohistochemical staining score were associated with increased TTP by univariate analysis. The ECOG PS (p = 0.022), Child–Pugh class (p = 0.045) and pERK staining score (p = 0.012) were found to be associated with TTP using multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Sorafenib treatment outcome is favorable in advanced HCC patients who received tumor resection and who have a good ECOG PS and Child–Pugh class A liver function. The pERK immunohistological staining score, ECOG PS and Child–Pugh class may be helpful in determining patients most likely to benefit from sorafenib therapy.     

Relationship of ethnicity and overall survival in patients treated with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Although both the SHARP and the Asian-Pacific trials showed improved overall survival (OS) for sorafenib, the magnitude of benefit was substantially less for Asians, who have a higher prevalence of hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection. Whether the worse prognosis is related to ethnicity or to the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors among patients with HCC who received sorafenib in British Columbia (BC), which has a sizeable Asian population.

Methods

A total of 255 consecutive patients with advanced HCC who initiated sorafenib from January 2008 to February 2013 were identified using our pharmacy database. Clinicopathological variables and outcomes were retrospectively collected. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Median age was 63 years, 80.2% were men, and 38% were Asian. Among them, 34.5% had HBV and 29.8% had hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. In addition, 68.6% had cirrhosis and 45.9% had liver-limited disease. Median progression-free and OS were 3.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.3-4.2] and 7.5 months (95% CI: 5.7-9.2), respectively. On multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and HCV positivity correlated with better OS (P<0.001 and 0.04, respectively), but ethnicity did not (P=0.622).

Conclusions

When treated with sorafenib at the same institution, Asians and Caucasians with advanced HCC had similar OS. ECOG PS and HCV were the only significant prognostic factors. A higher proportion of HCV positivity might explain why the SHARP trial achieved better OS when compared to the Asian-Pacific trial.     

Phase III study of sorafenib after transarterial chemoembolisation in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundIn Japan and South Korea, transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is an important locoregional treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has been shown effective and safe in patients with advanced HCC. This phase III trial assessed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable HCC who responded to TACE.MethodsPatients (n = 458) with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis and ?25% tumour necrosis/shrinkage 1–3 months after 1 or 2 TACE sessions were randomised 1:1 to sorafenib 400 mg bid or placebo and treated until progression/recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end-point was time to progression/recurrence (TTP). Secondary end-point was overall survival (OS).FindingsBaseline characteristics in the two groups were similar; >50% of patients started sorafenib >9 weeks after TACE. Median TTP in the sorafenib and placebo groups was 5.4 and 3.7 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–1.09; P = 0.252). HR (sorafenib/placebo) for OS was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.69–1.64; P = 0.790). Median daily dose of sorafenib was 386 mg, with 73% of patients having dose reductions and 91% having dose interruptions. Median administration of sorafenib and placebo was 17.1 and 20.1 weeks, respectively. No unexpected adverse events were observed.InterpretationThis trial, conducted prior to the reporting of registrational phase III trials, found that sorafenib did not significantly prolong TTP in patients who responded to TACE. This may have been due to delays in starting sorafenib after TACE and/or low daily sorafenib doses.