Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting in Iran

Objective Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are a major cause of patient morbidity and mortality. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs remains the cornerstone of pharmacovigilance and is important in maintaining patient safety. In order to determine whether our pharmacovigilance system could be improved, and identify reasons for under-reporting, a study to investigate the role of pharmacists in ADR reporting was performed in Shiraz. Setting: The pharmacies in Shiraz, capital of Fars province in Iran. Methods A questionnaire was prepared to investigate knowledge and attitude of pharmacists regarding ADR reporting. The questionnaire was given to 200 pharmacists who participated in a pharmacist association meeting. Main outcomes measured: The knowledge of pharmacovigilance practice, reasons for not reporting ADR, and perceptions of the Iranian pharmacists on pharmacovigilance practice were evaluated Results The response rate was 55% (n = 110). 29% of the respondents were not aware of the Iranian Pharmacovigilance Center. More than half of those responding felt that ADR reporting should be voluntary, while 26% felt it was a professional obligation. As for the purposes of ADR reporting scheme, 60% of the pharmacists falsely believed that monitoring ADR spontaneous reports aims at measuring the incidence of ADR. 42% of the pharmacists indicated that they have suspected an ADR without reporting it. Doubt about causality was the major reason for not reporting an ADR. Although our ADR center states that all suspected reactions to any drug on the market must be reported, only 17% of the respondents seemed to be aware of this responsibility. Conclusion Our pharmacists have little knowledge regarding the operation, purposes, and usefulness of ADR spontaneous reporting system. However, education and training will be important in maintaining and increasing ADR reports from pharmacists.     

Pharmacists' attitudes towards the reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions in Norway

BACKGROUND: In Scandinavian countries, pharmacists have not reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs), either due to legislative restrictions or because of lack of tradition. From 1 January 2005, Norwegian pharmacists have been encouraged by the Norwegian Medicines Agency to take a larger role in the reporting of ADRs. OBJECTIVE: To explore pharmacists' attitudes towards pharmacovigilance and their experiences with ADR reporting, to evaluate the effect of an educational programme and to compare these findings to the attitudes in a control group. METHODS: From September 2004, pharmacies in two of Norway's five health regions were invited to attend a 3-month ADR reporting study, and 39 pharmacies were recruited. One pharmacist from each pharmacy participated in a 1 day pre-study educational programme and a 1 day post-study evaluation meeting. Pharmacists involved in the study answered a questionnaire (A) regarding their attitudes to ADR reporting (active group). A control group answered the same questionnaire. One reminder was sent. The active group evaluated the study by answering questionnaire A once more and an evaluation questionnaire (B). Qualitative aspects of ADR reporting were discussed with the active group post-study. RESULTS: The response rate for questionnaire A was 97% (n = 158) in the active group, 74% (n = 184) in the control group and the response rate for questionnaire A and B post-study was 68% (n = 105) in the active group. Pharmacists in the active group had more positive attitudes to ADR reporting after taking part in the study than the control group (p < 0.001). Lack of time, confidence and knowledge of reporting rules could potentially prevent them from reporting ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacists had positive attitudes towards pharmacovigilance, but very little experience with reporting. The educational programme clarified their role and increased their knowledge about the reporting requirements.     

Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions

AIMS: Voluntary adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting schemes have operated since the early sixties in many Western countries. It is generally recognized, however, that only a small proportion of ADRs is actually reported. The current survey was conducted to assess attitudes towards reporting of ADRs, and to study which types of ADRs are reported. METHODS: A questionnaire seeking reasons for nonreporting was sent to a random sample of 10% of medical practitioners in The Netherlands in October 1997. After 6 weeks, a reminder was sent to those who had not responded. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and forty-two (73%) questionnaires were returned, of which 94% were complete. The percentage of GPs (51%) which had ever reported an ADR to the national reporting centre was significantly higher than the percentage of specialists (35%), who reported more often to the pharmaceutical industry (34% vs 48%). 86% of GPs, 72% of surgical specialists and 81% of medical specialists had ever diagnosed an ADR, which they had not reported. Uncertainty as to whether the reaction was caused by a drug (72%), the ADR being trivial (75%) or too well known (93%) were the most important reasons for not reporting. 18% were not aware of the need to report ADRs, 22% did not know how to report ADRs, 38% did not have enough time, 36% thought that reporting was too bureaucratic and only 26% of Dutch physicians knew which ADRs to report. A serious ADR, an unlabelled ADR, an ADR to a new drug, history of reporting of one or more ADRs, and specialty were all independently associated with reporting of 16 hypothetical ADRs. Surgical and medical specialists tended to report less often than GPs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a considerable degree of underreporting, which might partly be explained by lack of knowledge and misconceptions about spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions.     

Developing an adverse drug reaction reporting system at a teaching hospital

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a frequent cause for hospitalization and occur often in hospitalized patients. The objective of this study was to establish an ADR reporting and monitoring system at a teaching hospital. The pharmacovigilance unit of Masih Daneshvari hospital was established by a clinical pharmacist and a clinical pharmacologist. Healthcare professionals were encouraged to report any suspected ADRs encountered in in-patients. The incidence, pattern, seriousness, severity and preventability of the reported ADRs were analysed. During the period of 12 months, for 6840 patients, 112 spontaneous reports were received. The most frequently reported reactions were due to anti-infective agents (58.2%). Ceftriaxone accounted for the highest number of the reported ADRs among anti-infective agents. The skin and appendages system was the most frequently affected system (32.5% of all reactions). Seventeen per cent of the ADRs were reported as serious reactions. Although the incidence of ADRs reported by physicians and nurses was found to be low, this programme was useful as a preliminary programme in initiating a culture of ADR reporting among healthcare professionals. Improved communication between the physicians and nurses with the pharmacovigilance centre in the hospital is suggested.     

Pharmacovigilance in China: development and challenges

Background Rational drug use and drug safety are becoming increasingly important concerns in China with the increasing public access to drugs and the health-care system, and this has led to the development of pharmacovigilance in China. Aim of the review To provide a brief introduction about pharmacovigilance in China in terms of system development, utilization and challenges. Method Relevant studies on pharmacovigilance related to the study aim was undertaken through literature search to synthesize the extracted data. Results The creation and evolvement of China’s pharmacovigilance system spans across 30 years since 1989. The system consists of four progressing administrative layers: county, municipal, provincial and national levels. China has passed over 20 laws and regulations related to pharmacovigilance covering the processes of drug development, manufacture, distribution and use with the aim to guard drug safety. An online spontaneous self-reporting Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Monitoring System was established in 2003. ADRs are mainly reported by medical institutions, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and drug distributors. Currently there is no mandatory ADR reporting requirement for pharmaceutical manufacturers, and a proposed regulation under public comment will likely change this. China has started to build active pharmacovigilance surveillance programs in addition to the passive ADR reporting system. The China Food and Drug Administration has established the intensive Safety Monitoring Program and the National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Sentinel Alliance Program based on electronic health records to further the efforts of ADR reporting, monitoring and analysis. Conclusion The practice of ADR monitoring and pharmacovigilance in China have made great progress. More efforts are needed both in system building, and creation of laws and regulations to strengthen the safe use of medicines.     

Quality check of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting forms of different countries

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are considered as one of the leading causes of death among hospitalized patients. Thus reporting of adverse drug reactions become an important phenomenon. Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting form is an essential component and a major tool of the pharmacovigilance system of any country. This form is a tool to collect information of ADRs which helps in establishing the causal relationship between the suspected drug and the reaction. As different countries have different forms, our aim was to study, analyze the suspected adverse drug reaction reporting form of different countries, and assess if these forms can capture all the data regarding the adverse drug reaction. For this analysis we identified 18 points which are essential to make a good adverse drug reaction report, enabling proper causality assessment of adverse reaction to generate a safety signal. Adverse drug reaction reporting forms of 10 different countries were collected from the internet and compared for 18 points like patient information, information about dechallenge–rechallenge, adequacy of space and columns to capture necessary information required for its causality assessment, etc. Of the ADR forms that we analyzed, Malaysia was the highest scorer with 16 out of 18 points. This study reveals that there is a need to harmonize the ADR reporting forms of all the countries because there is a lot of discrepancy in data captured by the existing ADR reporting forms as the design of these forms is different for different countries. These incomplete data obtained result in inappropriate causality assessment. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Factors influencing the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions--the experience of the Slovak Republic

The system of adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring in the Slovak Republic is greatly influenced by changes taking place in the current health care delivery system. Under-reporting and reporting biases due to selective ADR reporting provide very serious problems in pharmacovigilance. In the year 2001, the number of reported ADRs increased due to reports of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-induced cough; this coincided with limits being imposed on the use of angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. These factors provide an example of selective ADR reporting, deforming the quality of drug safety monitoring. They also indicate that administrative strategies can significantly affect spontaneous reporting activities.     

Developing a consumer reporting program in Malaysia: a novel initiative to improve pharmacovigilance

The national pharmacovigilance program in Malaysia is limited to very few centers and under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a major limitation. Studies from developed countries have documented the importance and usefulness of consumer reporting of ADRs. Involving consumers in ADR reporting can be very useful in improving the reporting rates in Malaysia. The present article highlights the proposed plan of initiating a consumer based pharmacovigilance program in University Wellness Center located inside the campus of the Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.     

Criteria-based adverse drug reaction reporting and the use of a relational database

The criteria-based ADR reporting program at Shands Hospital has been successful. When the Joint Commission reviewed this program in January 1991, they were satisfied that it met their standards. Efforts are now focusing on improving the capture of ADRs, which will make the information available from the database even more valuable. Data from Shands Hospital will contribute to postmarketing surveillance, patient care, and staff education, and these data will influence drug usage evaluations and the formulary. Observations will be used to recommend alternate therapies to prevent ADRs as well as methods to manage reactions should they occur. The listing of criteria has facilitated the reporting of ADRs at Shands Hospital, and communication of the information has been greatly enhanced by the ADR database. Efficiency has been improved as a result.     

Under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions in Sweden

INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) constitute a major problem, both from a medical point of view and as an economical burden. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs is one of the methods for post marketing surveillance of drug safety. Under-reporting can also provide an important obstacle to rapid and relevant signal detection. AIM: To investigate the rate of under-reporting serious ADRs of selected ICD 10 diagnoses. METHOD: In order to investigate the under-reporting rate we investigated at five hospitals within the county of Norrbotten in Sweden the total number of diagnosed cases during a period of 5 years (1996-2000) with the following diagnoses: cerebral haemorrhage (I 61.0-I 61.9), pulmonary embolism (I 26.0 and I 26.9), embolism or thrombosis (I 74.0-I 74.9), phlebititis, thrombophlebitits or venous thrombosis (I 80.0-I 80.3, I 80.8 and I 80.9) and portal vein thrombosis and other thrombosis or emboli (I 82.0-I 82.3, I 82.8 and I 82.9). The identity of these patients was obtained through a database search. The patients' case records were then scrutinized by a specially trained nurse and the drugs used at the time of the event were noted. An assessment of the possibility of an ADR was performed using standard WHO causality criteria. Later, database search in the Swedish ADR registry was performed in order to investigate whether these suspected ADRs had been reported to the national authority in Sweden or not. RESULTS: In total 1349 case records were found and scrutinized. Of these, 107 patients had received drugs that could have been a probable or possible cause to the diagnoses. Of these 92 cases had not been reported and only 15 patients were found in the database, giving an overall under-reporting rate of all ADRs of 86%.The most commonly occurring diagnoses were cerebral haemorrhage followed by venous thrombosis, 545 and 468 respectively. Among those cases that should have been reported according to the existing rules for spontaneous reporting of suspected ADRs the most frequently occurring diagnosis was cerebral haemorrhage (I 61.0) in connection to treatment with anticoagulants. CONCLUSION: The rate of spontaneous ADR reporting is very low, also for serious and fatal reactions.     

Adverse drug reactions: a review of relevant factors

We examined some of the factors that contribute to the development of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and analyzed postmarketing ADR reports for 22 drugs. The role of metabolic-based drug-drug interaction in the development of ADRs can not be overstated. Assessment of the postmarketing ADR data for 22 drugs revealed that drugs with high potential for eliciting clinically significant ADRs are usually detected and either withdrawn from the market or placed on restricted use within the first year or two of marketing. Postmarketing data could be a useful tool for understanding the ADR profile of drugs if reporting can be adequately monitored and verified. It is hoped that early evaluation of the clinically meaningful factors such as metabolism, pharmacogenetics, and effect of physiologic and pathophysiologic states on the clinical effect of a drug during drug development would significantly reduce the incidence and severity of post-marketing ADRs.     

Food and Drug Administration monitoring of adverse drug reactions

Food and Drug Administration requirements for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs), processing of ADR reports, and actions in response to these reports are described. FDA requires that drug manufacturers report ADRs to the FDA Division of Epidemiology and Surveillance; 90% of the ADR reports received are from manufacturers. Of the remaining 10%, one third are from pharmacists. FDA regulations were revised in 1985 to specifically define reportable ADRs and procedures for reporting; manufacturers are required to report within 15 days reactions that are serious and unlabeled. For newly approved drugs, reports on ADRs must be submitted quarterly for three years; subsequently, annual reporting is required. Any increase in the frequency of serious, labeled reactions must be reported. Serious reactions not listed in the product labeling must be reported for products marketed before 1962 for which new drug applications or abbreviated new drug applications were not filed. ADR information received by FDA is coded into standard terms and entered in a computerized database for evaluation by reviewers. If an important reaction is suspected, the report is entered in a tracking system for further monitoring. ADR reports may result in requirements for changes in product labeling, "Dear Doctor" letters, requirement of further study by the manufacturer, or withdrawal of the product. Information about ADRs is communicated to health-care practitioners in product labeling and in the literature. Pharmacists are encouraged to report suspected serious and unlabeled reactions to FDA so that the medical community and the public can benefit from current information about drug safety.     

Pharmacovigilance Skills,Knowledge and Attitudes in our Future Doctors – A Nationwide Study in the Netherlands

Pharmacovigilance centres monitor the safety of drugs, based on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported by doctors, pharmacists and pharmaceutical companies. However, the under‐reporting of ADRs remains a major problem. Our aim was to investigate preparedness of future doctors for their role in pharmacovigilance, by assessing their pharmacovigilance awareness, skills and knowledge. The study was a nationwide e‐survey among medical students (third to sixth year) of all eight medical schools in the Netherlands. The survey consisted of questions regarding pharmacovigilance awareness, skills and knowledge. Overall, 874 students provided informed consent and participated (response 12%). Almost all students (96%) intended to report serious ADRs in their future practice. Almost half (44%) of the students did not know where to report an ADR, and 78% did not know which items were necessary for a good‐quality ADR report. While more than 78% of the students agreed that pharmacovigilance is an important topic in their medical education, only 26% found that their current curriculum covered pharmacovigilance adequately. Although ADR reporting is considered relevant and important among future doctors, many do not know where and what to report. This is highly undesirable and should have consequences for pharmacotherapy teaching.     

近年我国药品不良反应报告与监测总体情况分析

目的了解我国近年来药品不良反应报告的现状,找出存在的问题,为加强药品不良反应报告和监测管理提出建议。方法收集2010~2014年连续5年国家药品不良反应监测年度报告,采用内容分析、二次分析、对比分析等方法对药品不良反应报告情况进行了探讨。结果我国药品不良反应报告的数量逐年增加,新的和严重的药品不良反应数量较少;药品不良反应报告主体是医疗机构,药品生产经营企业的报告比例较低,抗感染药品的药品不良反应仍居首位。结论加强药品不良反应报告管理依然是业内关注的重要问题之一。建议:提高新的、严重的不良反应报告率;强化药品生产、经营企业药品不良反应报告工作;重视抗感染药品的不良反应;促进药品不良反应的信息共享。     

药品不良反应文献数据库的建立与应用

目的:建立药品不良反应（ADRs）文献数据库,配合ADRs监测工作的开展,以防止药害事件的发生。方法:利用计算机网络技术和数据库技术,建立ADRs专题数据库及相应检索系统。结果与结论;ADRAs文献数据库能为药品上市后再评价、新药审批和注册提供依据,为药物不良反应的流行病学研究提供有用信息,是医院开展临床药学工作、进行ADRs监测、提供用药咨询的重要工具。     

Do pharmacists' reports of adverse drug reactions reflect patients' concerns?

Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the concerns patients express to a Drug Information Line about possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs) they have experienced, are sufficiently reflected by the ADR reports submitted by pharmacists to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb with regard to the type of ADRs and the drug groups involved. Methods: ADR-related questions patients addressed to the Dutch Drugs Information Line were compared with the ADR reports pharmacists sent in to Lareb in the same period. The similarities and differences between the characteristics of the suspected ADRs and the kinds of drugs mentioned were investigated, as well as the severity of the reported ADRs. To compare the two data sets and to establish whether significant differences were present, a logistic regression analysis was conducted on the reported drugs and ADRs. Results: Analysis of the content of the phone calls yielded 1168 (14.6%) calls concerning possible experienced ADRs. The suspected ADRs pharmacists reported to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb in the same period included 1734 reports. There were only slight differences between the queries patients put to the Drug Information Line regarding possible adverse drug reactions and the reports on suspected ADRs pharmacists submitted to the pharmacovigilance centre. With respect to possible ADRs in the psychiatric spectrum and ADRs associated with the use of antidepressants, there seems to be a deficiency in the reporting by pharmacists. Conclusion: The ADRs pharmacists report to the national pharmacovigilance centre reflect patients' concerns about ADRs they experience in relation to the medication they are taking.     

Applying quantitative methods for detecting new drug safety signals in pharmacovigilance national database

OBJECTIVES: To applies three different methods of signal detection to the registered adverse events in Iranian Pharmacovigilance database over the period of 1998-2005. METHODS: All adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to Iranian Pharmacovigilance Center (IPC) from March 1998 through January 2005, were used for the analysis. The data were analysed based on three different signal detection methods including reporting odds ratios (RORs), information component (IC) and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs). The signals detected were categorised based on the number of reports per drug-adverse event combination, severity of the event and labelled or unlabelled ADRs. RESULTS: During the study period, 6353 cases of ADR reports describing 11 130 reactions were received by IPC. The dataset involved 4975 drug-adverse event combinations. The count of drug-event combinations was 1, 2 and 3 or more for 3470, 726 and 779 combinations, respectively. According to PRRs, there were 2838, 872 and 488 drug-event combinations known as a signal for the pairs with the reporting frequency of 1, 2 and 3 reports, respectively. The results of estimating RORs showed that 2722, 862 and 481 drug-adverse event combinations were detected to be signal for the pairs with the reporting frequency of 1, 2 and 3 reports, respectively, while measuring IC and IC-2SD detected 1120, 378 and 235 for the same reporting frequencies. Diclofenac-induced paralysis and tramadol-induced severe reactions were the most important signals. CONCLUSION: Applying quantitative signal detection methods to the database of national pharmacovigilance centres is necessary to early detection of drug safety alerts.