Caspofungin: a review of its use in oesophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis

Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agents with a novel mechanism of action (interference with fungal cell wall synthesis). Caspofungin (Cancidas), Caspofungin MSD) is the first echinocandin to be approved and is administered intravenously.Caspofungin 50 mg/day had similar efficacy to intravenous fluconazole 200 mg/day and was at least as effective as intravenous amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day in patients with oesophageal candidiasis in two randomised, double-blind studies. A favourable combined clinical and endoscopic response occurred in 81% of caspofungin recipients versus 85% of fluconazole recipients and in 74% of caspofungin recipients versus 63% of amphotericin B recipients. A favourable combined response rate of approximate, equals 90% and approximate, equals 60% occurred in the stratum of patients with oesophageal candidiasis who received caspofungin or amphotericin B in a third randomised, double-blind study.Caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) had similar efficacy to intravenous amphotericin B (0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day in patients with neutropenia and 0.6-0.7 mg/kg/day in patients without neutropenia) in patients with invasive candidiasis in a double-blind, randomised trial. A favourable overall response occurred in 73.4% of caspofungin recipients and in 61.7% of amphotericin B recipients.In a noncomparative study, salvage therapy with caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) was effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or did not tolerate standard antifungal therapy. A favourable response (complete plus partial response) occurred in 37 of 83 patients (45%).Caspofungin was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; it had similar tolerability to intravenous fluconazole and was better tolerated than intravenous amphotericin B. Significantly fewer caspofungin than amphotericin B recipients reported chills, fever, nausea or infusion-related adverse events. In conclusion, caspofungin is a valuable new antifungal agent with a novel mechanism of action. In comparative trials, caspofungin had similar efficacy to fluconazole and was at least as effective as amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and had similar efficacy to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis. In addition, caspofungin had similar tolerability to fluconazole and was better tolerated than amphotericin B in these indications. Caspofungin was also effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or intolerant of standard antifungal agents. Thus, caspofungin provides an alternative to triazoles or amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and an alternative to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis, as well as being an effective salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis.     

symbol: see text]Caspofungin and [symbol: see text]voriconazole for fungal infections

Systemic fungal infections are difficult to treat and often fatal. Established treatment options include conventional amphotericin B or one of its lipid-based or liposomal formulations, or a triazole antifungal such as fluconazole or itraconazole. [symbol: see text]Caspofungin (Cancidas--Merck Sharp & Dohme) and [symbol: see text]voriconazole (Vfend--Pfizer) are two new antifungals for severe infections caused by Candida spp. (invasive candidiasis) and Aspergillus spp. (invasive aspergillosis). Caspofungin is the first licensed echinocandin antifungal, while voriconazole is a triazole. Promotional claims for caspofungin include that it "provides an effective, yet less toxic, alternative to amphotericin B" while voriconazole is claimed to offer "significantly improved survival in invasive aspergillosis compared with amphotericin B". Here we consider the place of caspofungin and voriconazole in managing patients with severe fungal infections.     

Caspofungin

Caspofungin is the first in a new class of antifungal agents, the glucan synthesis inhibitors, that interfere with fungal cell wall synthesis. Caspofungin exhibited in vitro and in vivo efficacy against a wide range of fungi and yeasts including Aspergillus and Candida species. A complete or partial response to caspofungin therapy was seen in 40.7% of immunocompromised adults with invasive aspergillosis who did not respond to, or did not tolerate, other antifungal agents in a noncomparative multicentre study. Caspofungin was effective in patients with oropharyngeal or oesophageal candidiasis, according to the preliminary results of 2 randomised double-blind trials. Caspofungin was generally well tolerated in a multicentre noncomparative trial involving patients with invasive aspergillosis. One or more drug-related clinical adverse effects were experienced by 13.8% of caspofungin recipients (the most common were fever, nausea, vomiting and complications associated with the vein into which caspofungin was infused). The tolerability of caspofungin appeared to be better than that of amphotericin B and similar to that of fluconazole in double-blind, randomised trials involving patients with mucosal candidiasis.     

Micafungin: a review of its use in adults for the treatment of invasive and oesophageal candidiasis, and as prophylaxis against Candida infections

Intravenous micafungin (Mycamine; Fungard), an echinocandin, inhibits the synthesis of 1,3-beta-D-glucan, an essential cell wall component in many fungi. It is approved in adults (focus of this review) and in neonates and paediatric patients (Pediatric Drugs [in press]) in the EU and elsewhere for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and oesophageal candidiasis, and as prophylactic treatment to prevent Candida infections in haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.Intravenous micafungin shows very good activity against clinically relevant isolates of Candida spp. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic profile of micafungin permits once-daily treatment and means that it is associated with relatively few drug-drug interactions. However, like all of the echinocandins and all formulations of amphotericin B, micafungin must be given intravenously. In large, well designed clinical trials in adult patients (>or=16 years of age) with invasive candidiasis, intravenous micafungin was shown to be noninferior to intravenous caspofungin or liposomal amphotericin B. In similarly designed trials in adult patients with oesophageal candidiasis, intravenous micafungin was shown to be noninferior to fluconazole or caspofungin treatment. As prophylactic treatment in adult and paediatric patients who had undergone HSCT, micafungin was superior to fluconazole therapy in a large, well designed trial. Micafungin was generally well tolerated by participants in these clinical trials. Furthermore, it was as well tolerated as caspofungin and fluconazole, and better tolerated than liposomal amphotericin B. The position of micafungin relative to newer antifungal therapies, such as anidulafungin, voriconazole and posaconazole, remains to be fully determined. Thus, micafungin is an emerging option for the treatment of adult patients with invasive or oesophageal candidiasis, and as prophylaxis against Candida infections in HSCT recipients.     

Caspofungin: pharmacology,safety and therapeutic potential in superficial and invasive fungal infections

Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients. Current therapy with amphotericin B and antifungal triazoles has overlapping targets and is limited by toxicity and resistance. The echinocandin lipopeptide caspofungin is the first of a new class of antifungal compounds that inhibit the synthesis of 1,3-β-D-glucan. This homopolysaccharide is a major component of the cell wall of many pathogenic fungi and yet is absent in mammalian cells. It provides osmotic stability and is important for cell growth and cell division. In vitro, caspofungin has broad-spectrum antifungal activity against Candida and Aspergillus spp. without cross-resistance to existing agents. The compound exerts prolonged post-antifungal effects and fungicidal activity against Candida spp. and causes severe damage of Aspergillus fumigatus at the sites of hyphal growth. Animal models have demonstrated efficacy against disseminated candidiasis and disseminated and pulmonary aspergillosis, both in normal and in immunocompromised animals. Caspofungin possesses favourable pharmacokinetic properties and is not metabolised through the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. It showed highly promising antifungal efficacy in Phase II and III clinical trials in immunocompromised patients with oesophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin was effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis intolerant or refractory to standard therapies. Based on its documented antifungal efficacy and an excellent safety profile, caspofungin has been approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients who are refractory to or intolerant of other therapies (i.e., amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and/or itraconazole). Phase III clinical trials in patients with candidaemia and in persistently febrile neutropenic patients requiring empirical antifungal therapy are ongoing. This paper reviews the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of caspofungin and its potential role for treatment of invasive and superficial fungal infections in patients.     

Caspofungin: new indication. No progress in invasive candidiasis

(1) The reference treatment for invasive candidiasis in patients without neutropenia is standard amphotericin B. If this treatment fails or is too nephrotoxic, second-line alternatives are liposomal amphotericin B and fluconazole. Voriconazole is a third-line option. (2) Caspofungin, an antifungal drug belonging to the echinocandin class, is now approved for use in this indication in France. (3) The clinical evaluation dossier contains no data from comparative trials with fluconazole or voriconazole. It only gives the results of a double-blind trial in 239 patients, designed to show simply that caspofungin was not inferior to standard amphotericin B. Most of the patients did not have neutropenia. About one-third of the patients died. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups. No data are available from trials versus other forms of amphotericin B. (4) In this trial, caspofungin had fewer adverse effects (especially nephrotoxicity) than standard amphotericin B. However, in other trials in other indications, caspofungin had more adverse effects than fluconazole. (5) In France, caspofungin costs nearly 100 times more than standard amphotericin B. (6) In practice, caspofungin has no proven advantages over existing options for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in patients without neutropenia.     

Caspofungin: first approved agent in a new class of antifungals

Caspofungin (Cancidas, Merck & Co. Inc.) is the first echinocandin antifungal agent to gain FDA-approval for use in the US. It has excellent clinical activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. but lacks significant activity against Cryptococcus neoformans. Caspofungin may have some activity against dimorphic fungi such as Histoplasma capsulatum and Coccidioides immitis, but no clinical data is available for treatment of these infections. Caspofungin has demonstrated poor activity against most filamentous fungi in vitro. Several clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in the treatment of oropharyngeal, oesophageal and invasive candidiasis, as well as invasive aspergillosis. As a result of caspofungin's unique mechanism of action, and the high morbidity and mortality of invasive fungal infections, there is considerable interest in using this new antifungal agent as part of a combination antifungal therapy. In vitro studies and small case series indicate that caspofungin does not appear to be antagonistic when combined with other antifungals, such as itraconazole, voriconazole or amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. Caspofungin exerts concentration-dependent killing effects in many different in vitro and animal models of disseminated fungal infection. The usual daily dose is 50 mg/day i.v. following a 70 mg i.v. loading dose. However, higher caspofungin doses have been safely administered and up to 70 mg/day can be administered for patients who fail to respond to lower doses. Caspofungin has an excellent safety profile with reduced toxicities, compared to other licensed antifungal agents. Fever, thrombophlebitis, headache and liver enzyme elevations were the most common drug-related side effects reported in clinical trials so far. Additional data are needed to document its safety in long-term use, and with higher doses in patients with invasive fungal infections. Caspofungin is a promising agent as first-line therapy for invasive candidiasis, and as salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis. However, more clinical data are needed to define its role as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis, and its role in combination antifungal therapy.     

The echinocandins: comparison of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical applications

Caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin are three drugs of the echinocandin class of antifungals available for intravenous treatment of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis. They exhibit high in vitro and in vivo activities against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. In various clinical studies investigating candidemia and invasive candidiasis, Candida esophagitis, and fever in neutropenia, the clinical efficacy of the echinocandin tested was similar to that of established antifungals. Antifungal activity against strains no longer susceptible to conventional antifungal agents, such as fluconazole and amphotericin B suggests that echinocandins can be used as salvage therapy in life-threatening fungal infections. There is no cross-resistance to other antifungals. Excellent safety and tolerability of treatment with caspofungin has been documented over a total of 4.3 million patient days. Echinocandins are poor substrates of the cytochrome P450 enzyme family and can be safely co-administered with most drugs without the need for dosage adaptation. No dose reduction is required in renal impairment. A reduction in the daily maintenance dose has been recommended for caspofungin, but not for micafungin and anidulafungin in patients presenting with mild to moderate hepatic failure.     

Caspofungin: new preparation. A last resort in invasive aspergillosis

(1) Invasive aspergillosis is rare. It usually occurs in immunocompromised patients and is fatal despite treatment in 40-90% of cases. The reference treatments are standard amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, and itraconazole. (2) Caspofungin, an antifungal drug, is now approved in the Europe Union for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, when reference drugs fail or are poorly tolerated. (3) In a non comparative trial in 69 patients, intravenous caspofungin infusion was at least partly effective: 40% of patients survived with few relapses for at least one year following treatment. A historical comparison also favours caspofungin therapy. (4) The safety profile of caspofungin is poorly documented. It includes local reactions at the injection site, systemic reactions linked to the infusion (especially due to histamine release) and hepatic disorders. (5) Caspofungin is known to interact with tacrolimus (lower tacrolimus concentrations), ciclosporin (increased caspofungin bioavailability) and rifampicin (reduced caspofungin bioavailability). (6) In practice, caspofungin is an acceptable option for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis when standard amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, and itraconazole are ineffective or poorly tolerated. Its clinical assessment is limited and must be continued.     

Developments in the treatment of candidiasis: more choices and new challenges

The incidence of oesophageal candidiasis, candidaemia and disseminated candidiasis has increased dramatically. In addition to the amphotericin B formulations and fluconazole, the echinocandins anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin and the newer triazoles posaconazole and voriconazole are in the last stages of development and are becoming available for the management of candidiasis. This review presents these new agents and addresses their role in the treatment of candidiasis. All new antifungal agents exhibit potent activity against Candida spp. and echinocandins are fungicidal against most Candida spp. but appear to be less potent against certain species, such as Candida parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii. Systemic antifungal therapy can now be individualised based on the severity of the infection, comorbid conditions and the Candida spp. causing the infection. Studies are needed to investigate the possible development of resistance and the efficacy of these antifungal agents against the more resistant Candida spp.     

新型抗真菌药物caspofungin

caspofungin是新型葡聚糖合成酶抑制剂类抗真菌药物中第 1个上市的药物 ,它能有效抑制 β ( 1,3) D 葡聚糖的合成 ,从而干扰真菌细胞壁的合成。caspofungin在体内、外具有广泛的抗真菌活性 ,包括曲菌和念珠菌。多中心试验表明 ,caspofungin治疗难治性或不能耐受其他治疗的侵袭性曲菌感染病人的临床有效率为 4 0 .7%。 2个随机双盲试验表明 ,caspofungin能有效治疗咽或食道念珠菌感染。侵袭性曲菌病人对caspofungin的耐受性较好。本文综述了caspofungin的药效学、药动学特性、临床疗效和不良反应等。     

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal dispersion of a stable complex of amphotericin B with cholesteryl sulphate in a 1:1 proportion, forming uniform disk-shaped particles. ABCD is associated with less nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related adverse events are more frequent in patients receiving ABCD than in patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B deoxycholate. ABCD has been shown in a randomised, double-blind study, to be an effective alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia. ABCD is active in the treatment of invasive Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. infections in immunocompromised hosts, however most of the data supporting its use for these types of infections is derived from non-comparative open-label clinical trials of patient refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. ABCD is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients where renal impairment or unacceptable toxicity precludes the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate in effective doses, and in patients with invasive aspergillosis where prior amphotericin B deoxycholate therapy has failed. Two other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B, are available and, like ABCD, are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity as compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. The role of ABCD in comparison with these other lipid formulations of amphotericin B is discussed herein. High cost remains an issue with all lipid formulations of amphotericin B.     

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal dispersion of a stable complex of amphotericin B with cholesteryl sulphate in a 1:1 proportion, forming uniform disk-shaped particles. ABCD is associated with less nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related adverse events are more frequent in patients receiving ABCD than in patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B deoxycholate. ABCD has been shown in a randomised, double-blind study, to be an effective alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia. ABCD is active in the treatment of invasive Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. infections in immunocompromised hosts, however most of the data supporting its use for these types of infections is derived from non-comparative open-label clinical trials of patient refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. ABCD is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients where renal impairment of unacceptable toxicity precludes the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate in effective doses, and in patients with invasive aspergillosis where prior amphotericin B deoxycholate therapy has failed. Two other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B, are available and, like ABCD, are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity as compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. The role of ABCD in comparison with these other lipid formulations of amphotericin B is discussed herein. High cost remains an issue with all lipid formulations of amphotericin B.     

Caspofungin acetate: an antifungal agent.

The pharmacology, bioavailability and pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of caspofungin acetate are reviewed. Caspofungin acetate is an echinocandin with fungicidal activity against a wide range of pathogens, including Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and Histoplasma spp. It is active against fluconazole-resistant and fluconazole-susceptible strains of Candida albicans. Caspofungin acetate irreversibly inhibits the enzyme 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase, preventing the formation of glucan polymers and disrupting the integrity of the fungal cell wall. Caspofungin acetate has an elimination half-life of 9-10 hours and is suitable for once-daily regimens. Data from animal and human studies demonstrate that the drug is 80-96% protein bound. Less than 3% of the dose is eliminated unchanged in the urine, and the proposed route of elimination is hepatic. In a trial of 128 patients with Candida esophagitis, clinical response rates were higher with caspofungin acetate 50 or 70 mg/day (85%) than with amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day (67%). Most enrolled patients had HIV infection, and almost half had CD4+ lymphocyte counts of less than 50 cells/microL in another study, 56 immunocompromised patients with aspergillosis were treated with one 70-mg dose of caspofungin acetate, then 50 mg once a day. All patients had refractory invasive aspergillosis or were intolerant of amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, or azole therapy. In patients who received at least one dose of caspofungin acetate, a favorable response was reported in 41%. In 128 patients who received either caspofungin acetate or amphotericin B, fewer caspofungin acetate recipients (1.4%) had elevated serum creatinine levels and discontinued therapy because of adverse effects (4%) than amphotericin B recipients (15% and 22%, respectively). The manufacturer's recommended dose for infections caused by Candida or Aspergillus spp. has not been determined. Caspofungin acetate appears to be fungicidal, with a wide spectrum of antifungal activity and a good safety profile. The lack of adequate efficacy and safety data in humans makes a recommendation to add this drug to the formulary premature. Pending advanced clinical trials and cost information, caspofungin acetate may be a reasonable addition to the formulary, particularly in hospitals with large immunocompromised patient populations.     

Echinocandins: A ray of hope in antifungal drug therapy

Invasive fungal infections are on the rise. Amphotericin B and azole antifungals have been the mainstay of antifungal therapy so far. The high incidence of infusion related toxicity and nephrotoxicity with amphotericin B and the emergence of fluconazole resistant strains of Candida glabrata egged on the search for alternatives. Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal drugs that act by inhibition of β (1, 3)-D- glucan synthase, a key enzyme necessary for integrity of the fungal cell wall.Caspofungin was the first drug in this class to be approved. It is indicated for esophageal candidiasis, candidemia, invasive candidiasis, empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and invasive aspergillosis. Response rates are comparable to those of amphotericin B and fluconazole. Micafungin is presently approved for esophageal candidiasis, for prophylaxis of candida infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and in disseminated candidiasis and candidemia. The currently approved indications for anidulafungin are esophageal candidiasis, candidemia and invasive candidiasis.The incidence of infusion related adverse effects and nephrotoxicity is much lower than with amphotericin B. The main adverse effect is hepatotoxicity and derangement of serum transaminases. Liver function may need to be monitored. They are, however, safer in renal impairment. Even though a better pharmacoeconomical choice than amphotericin B, the higher cost of these drugs in comparison to azole antifungals is likely to limit their use to azole resistant cases of candidial infections and as salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis rather than as first line drugs.     

Antifungal agents in neonates: issues and recommendations

Fungal infections are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period, particularly among premature neonates. Four classes of antifungal agents are commonly used in the treatment of fungal infections in pediatric patients: polyene macrolides, fluorinated pyrimidines, triazoles, and echinocandins. Due to the paucity of pediatric data, many recommendations for the use of antifungal agents in this population are derived from the experience in adults. The purpose of this article was to review the published data on fungal infections and antifungal agents, with a focus on neonatal patients, and to provide an overview of the differences in antifungal pharmacology in neonates compared with adults. Pharmacokinetic data suggest dosing differences in children versus adult patients with some antifungals, but not all agents have been fully evaluated. The available pharmacokinetic data on the amphotericin B deoxycholate formulation in neonates exhibit considerable variability; nevertheless, the dosage regimen suggested in the neonatal population is similar to that used in adults. More pharmacokinetic information is available on the liposomal and lipid complex preparations of amphotericin B and fluconazole, and it supports their use in neonates; however, the optimal dosage and duration of therapy is difficult to establish. All amphotericin-B formulations, frequently used in combination with flucytosine, are useful for treating disseminated fungal infections and Candida meningitis in neonates. Fluconazole, with potent in vitro activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and almost all Candida spp., has been used in neonates with invasive candidiasis at dosages of 6 mg/kg/day, and for antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk neonates. There are limited data on itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole use in neonates. Caspofungin, which is active against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., requires higher doses in children relative to adults, and dosing is best accomplished based on body surface area. Micafungin shows a clear trend toward lower levels in the smallest patients. There are no data on the use of other new antifungal drugs (ravuconazole and anidulafungin) in neonates. In summary, the initial data suggest dosage differences in neonates for some antifungal agents, although the newer agents have not been fully tested for optimal administration in these patients.     

Caspofungin for the treatment of fungal infections: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

During the last decade, owing to the low effectiveness and high toxicity of older antifungals, new antifungal agents have been released to the market for the treatment of patients with fungal infections. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of caspofungin in comparison with other antifungal agents. This review was conducted to examine further the role of caspofungin in the treatment of patients with fungal, mainly Candida, infections. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search, study selection and data extraction from relevant RCTs. A total of six RCTs comparing caspofungin with amphotericin B (deoxycholate in four and liposomal in one RCT) or fluconazole (in one RCT), which studied a total of 1974 patients, were included in our review. Success of the applied treatment in the clinically evaluable patients was achieved in 496/943 (52.6%) of the caspofungin-treated patients and in 381/852 (44.7%) of the amphotericin B- and lipid amphotericin B-treated patients. Discontinuation due to drug toxicity was significantly less common in patients receiving caspofungin than amphotericin B (odds ratio (OR) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.85, random effects model). Development of nephrotoxicity, hypokalaemia and fever also occurred significantly less often with caspofungin than amphotericin B (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.36, fixed effects model; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.12-0.76, random effects model; and OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.79, random effects model, respectively). No difference in mortality was noted. Caspofungin was associated with better clinical outcomes (higher cure and fewer adverse effects) than amphotericin B in the treatment of patients with fungal infections.     

Antifungals in systemic neonatal candidiasis

Fungal infections are common in the newborn period, especially among premature neonates, and are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Currently, three classes of antifungals are commonly used in the treatment of systemic fungal infections in neonates: the polyene macrolides (e.g. amphotericin B [deoxycholate and lipid preparations]); the azoles (e.g. fluconazole); and the fluorinated pyrimidines (e.g. flucytosine). The echinocandins (e.g. caspofungin and micafungin) are a newer class of antifungals which shows promise in this population.The available kinetic data on amphotericin B deoxycholate in neonates are derived from very small studies and exhibit considerable variability. There are no kinetic data available for the use of lipid preparations in this population and, again, much has been inferred from adult studies. The information available for flucytosine is also limited but appears similar to what is observed in adults. Fluconazole has the most neonatal pharmacokinetic data, which show slightly less variability than the other antifungals. Genomic factors which affect the metabolism of amphotericin B and fluconazole may explain some of the observed variability.Most of the data for the efficacy of antifungal drugs in neonates are derived from retrospective studies and case reports. The data for amphotericin B deoxycholate and flucytosine are limited. There are more data for the liposomal and lipid complex preparations of amphotericin B and for fluconazole in this population. These support the use of these drugs in neonates, but because of their largely noncomparative nature they can not define the optimal dosage or duration of therapy.Amphotericin B deoxycholate is primarily nephrotoxic. It also induces electrolyte abnormalities and is to a lesser degree cardiotoxic. This toxicity in neonates appears similar to published data in older children and adults. While the lipid preparations of amphotericin B owe their existence to a presumed decrease in toxicity, the observed toxicity in neonates appears to be equal to that seen with the deoxycholate, although it should be noted that the lipid preparations are usually given at much higher dosages. Fluconazole toxicity appears to be milder and less frequent in this population than is seen with amphotericin B.In the final analysis, we do not have sufficient data to define the pharmacokinetic profiles, optimal dose or duration of therapy, or toxicity for any of these compounds in neonates. Further studies are necessary if the optimisation of antifungal therapy in this population is to continue.     

新型抗真菌药物卡泊芬净

卡泊芬净为美国及欧洲批准的棘球白素类中第一个用于临床的药物,是真菌细胞壁1,3-β-D葡聚糖合成酶抑制剂,用于两性霉素B治疗无效或不能耐受两性霉素B的侵袭性曲霉病成年患者.综述了卡泊芬净(caspofungin)的抗真菌作用机制、药动学及临床评价.     

The pharmacology and clinical use of caspofungin

Caspofungin was the first echinocandin to be licensed for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Caspofungin has in vitro and in vivo activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., which constitute the majority of medically important opportunistic fungal pathogens. Caspofungin inhibits the synthesis of the 1,3-beta-glucan, with resultant osmotic instability and lysis. The pharmacology of caspofungin is relatively complex. Trafficking of drug into tissues is an important determinant of the shape of the concentration-time relationship. Caspofungin has demonstrated efficacy in experimental models of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis, which reflect its activity in the treatment of oropharyngeal, esophageal and disseminated candidiasis, as well as salvage therapy for patients with invasive aspergillosis.