Louisiana dentists' attitudes toward the dental Medicaid program.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine factors associated with Louisiana dentists' participation in the Dental Medicaid Program. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to all pediatric and general dentists as reported by the Louisiana State Board of Licensing. A second mailing was made to non-respondents. RESULTS: Surveys from 956 of 1,926 dentists (50%) were returned. Of 607 general dentists and 40 pediatric dentists who treated dental Medicaid-enrolled children in the past year, 269 (44%) and 18 (45%), respectively, treated all Medicaid-enrolled children. Newly graduated dentists were more likely to be actively enrolled than their more established counterparts (chi 2 = 10.67; p = 0.01). Medicaid reimbursement levels were viewed as "much less" than private fees by 62%, "less" by 33% and "the same" by 4% of the respondents. Broken appointments were the most prevalent reported problem (80%), followed by low fees (61%), patient non-compliance (59%), unreasonable denial of payments (57%), slow payment (44%), and complicated paperwork (42%). With the exception of the perceived importance of Medicaid reimbursement levels, active and inactive general and pediatric dentists' perceptions of the importance of Medicaid issues were not significantly different. These findings indicated that significantly more Medicaid-active general dentists who allocated 10% of their office visits to Medicaid-eligible children felt that slow payment (p = 0.002) and complicated paperwork (p < 0.001) were more important problems than general dentists who allocated less time to Medicaid-eligible children. CONCLUSIONS: Louisiana dentists' sources of dissatisfaction with Medicaid are similar to those of dentists in other states. Some of the issues are programmatic and are within the power of the dental Medicaid director and state legislature to address. Patient-related issues such as frequent broken appointments may be addressed by assigning case managers to Medicaid beneficiaries.     

Rural versus urban analysis of dental procedures provided to Virginia Medicaid recipients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the distribution of procedures provided to Virginia Medicaid children by 3 types of dental providers in rural and urban areas. METHODS: Medicaid claims filed for dental patients less than 21 years old were obtained and analyzed for fiscal years 1994-1995. Dental providers were categorized according to their practice type: (1) general practice (GP); (2) pediatric (PD); and (3) public health (PH) dentists. Each type of practice was categorized as practicing in a metropolitan, urban, rural, or completely rural location and evaluated for percentages of preventive, diagnostic, and corrective services provided. RESULTS: Rural areas had a higher percentage of significant providers than did metropolitan or urban areas. General dentists performed more diagnostic and preventive but fewer corrective procedures than pediatric dentists. Pediatric dentists and general dentists in completely rural areas performed more corrective procedures than their counterparts in metropolitan or urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: General, pediatric, and public health dentists in metropolitan and urban areas perform slightly more diagnostic services and fewer corrective services than practitioners in more rural areas.     

Method of payment for children's dental services by practice type and geographic location.

The purpose of this project was to evaluate practice type and geographical differences in methods of payment accepted for children's dental services. A survey was mailed to 2000 general dentists and 1000 pediatric dentists randomly selected to provide representation from the 50 United States. Dentists were asked to specify the type of practice and the state in which they primarily practice. The survey included Medicaid, dental insurance, preferred provider organizations (PPO), and self-payment as payment options. Dentists were asked to indicate whether they never, occasionally, or frequently accepted each option of payment for children's dental services. Responses were received from 1245 (42%) dentists, including 723 general dentists and 522 pediatric dentists. Chi-square statistical analysis revealed significant practice type and regional differences in the acceptance of Medicaid for payment. Pediatric dentists accept Medicaid more frequently than general dentists (P < 0.001). Most dentists accept dental insurance and self-payment, while few indicate involvement with a PPO. The study revealed significant practice type differences only in the acceptance of Medicaid as payment for children's dental services. On a geographic basis, there were significant differences in the acceptance of Medicaid and dental insurance.     

Dental case management: increasing access to oral health care for families and children with low incomes

BACKGROUND: Medicaid beneficiaries have lower rates of dental visits and higher rates of dental disease compared with the rest of the population. Beneficiaries ascribe their low use of services to difficulties finding dentists who treat patients with Medicaid. Dentists cite low reimbursement rates, excessive paperwork, and patients' not keeping appointments and poor oral health literacy as reasons for not accepting patients with Medicaid. The authors pilot-tested the effectiveness of a dental case management program (DCMP) in increasing dentists' participation in Medicaid and Medicaid beneficiaries' use of services. METHODS: A dental case manager recruits dentists to participate in the Medicaid program, arranges training in billing procedures, resolves billing and payment problems, educates clients about the use of dental services and keeping appointments, links clients to dental offices, identifies potential barriers to care and helps clients obtain transportation to appointments. The authors evaluated the levels of participation of dentists in the DCMP in Medicaid and Medicaid beneficiaries' use of services. RESULTS: Dentists accepting new Medicaid patients increased from two to 28, with 145 dental visits a month provided to Medicaid beneficiaries. The percentage of Medicaid beneficiaries receiving dental services increased from 9 to 41 percent after the DCMP was implemented. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that the DCMP was effective in increasing Medicaid beneficiaries' use of services, increasing dentists' participation in Medicaid, minimizing administrative burdens related to Medicaid participation, and increasing oral health literacy and treatment compliance among clients with low incomes.     

Hospital-Based Emergency Department Visits With Dental Conditions: Impact of the Medicaid Reimbursement Fee for Dental Services in New York State, 2009-2013

Objectives

Hospital-based emergency department (ED) visits for dental problems have been on the rise. The objectives of this study are to provide estimates of hospital-based ED visits with dental conditions in New York State and to examine the impact of Medicaid reimbursement fee for dental services on the utilization of EDs with dental conditions.

Geriatric oral health issues in the United States

Of the more than 270 million people in the United States, about 13 per cent are aged 65 years or older. As in most other countries throughout the world, this proportion of the population is projected to increase in the coming years. To care for this ageing and racially/ethnically diverse population, health care professionals, especially dentists, must initiate changes in public policies, available resources and access to services. The dental profession especially must improve awareness among the general public and health care professionals of the link between oral health and general health. Immediate improvements should be made to increase the proportion of dentists who are willing and qualified to treat these patient groups. Increasing the reimbursement rates available through the Medicaid programme and expanding the types of services Medicaid recipients can seek are critical. Dental education programmes must continue to provide more training opportunities to prepare professionals to meet the needs of these patients.     

Dentists' ranking of Medicaid reimbursement rates as a measure of their pediatric Medicaid participation

The objective of the study was to determine the usefulness of dentists' ranking of Medicaid reimbursement rates as a measure of their participation in the Medicaid program for children. Data were obtained from two mail-in questionnaire surveys of Connecticut dentists, before and after an increase in Medicaid reimbursement rates for children. Dentists ranked acceptability of Medicaid reimbursement rates on a seven-point index, while their participation in the Medicaid program was assessed by whether they acknowledged treating Medicaid children and were currently accepting new Medicaid children into their practices. There was a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the dentists' ranking of Medicaid reimbursement rates following the rate increase indicating that the index was responsive. Acceptance of new Medicaid children into dental practices was a better measure of active participation in the Medicaid program. Following the increase in Medicaid reimbursement rates, dentists ranking it as acceptable/equivocal were more likely (p < 0.02) to accept new Medicaid children into their practices. In conclusion, the index of dentists' ranking of Medicaid reimbursement rates was a responsive and valid measure of their participation in the Medicaid program.     

Pharmacological management of the pediatric dental patient

Pharmacological management of the pediatric dental patient is considered a subcategory of a broader collection of professional mediated activities known as behavior management techniques. Pharmacological techniques are generally divided into either: (1) various levels of sedation; or (2) general anesthesia. Pharmacological techniques are not universally offered by practicing dentists for a host of reasons including, but not limited to: (1) variation in practitioner training and philosophy; (2) state rules and regulations; (3) cost and reimbursement; and (4) safety issues.     

The pediatric dental workforce in 2016 and beyond

BackgroundChildhood caries is a major oral and general health problem, particularly in certain populations. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the adequacy of the supply of pediatric dentists.MethodsThe authors collected baseline practice information from 2,546 pediatric dentists through an online survey (39.1% response rate) in 2017. The authors used a workforce simulation model by using data from the survey and other sources to produce estimates under several scenarios to anticipate future supply and demand for pediatric dentists.ResultsIf production of new pediatric dentists and use and delivery of oral health care continue at current rates, the pediatric dentist supply will increase by 4,030 full-time equivalent (FTE) dentists by 2030, whereas demand will increase by 140 FTE dentists by 2030. Supply growth was higher under hypothetical scenarios with an increased number of graduates (4,690 FTEs) and delayed retirement (4,320 FTEs). If children who are underserved experience greater access to care or if pediatric dentists provide a larger portion of services for children, demand could grow by 2,100 FTE dentists or by 10,470 FTE dentists, respectively.ConclusionsThe study results suggest that the supply of pediatric dentists is growing more rapidly than is the demand. Growth in demand could increase if pediatric dentists captured a larger share of pediatric dental services or if children who are underserved had oral health care use patterns similar to those of the population with fewer access barriers.Practical ImplicationsIt is important to encourage policy changes to reduce barriers to accessing oral health care, to continue pediatric dentists’ participation with Medicaid programs, and to urge early dental services for children.     

Access to dental care for children in the United States: a survey of general practitioners

BACKGROUND: In response to concern that inadequate dental school training may create a barrier to access to care for children, the authors conducted a survey concerning general practitioners' practice patterns involving child patients. METHODS: The authors requested a list of 4,970 randomly chosen general practitioners from the American Dental Association Survey Center. They then sent those dentists a written survey asking whether and in what numbers they treat children; the ages and caries levels of any children they do treat; their perceptions of their educational experiences in pediatric dentistry, and their perceived needs for continuing education in pediatric dentistry. They analyzed data using chi2. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of the general dentists surveyed treated children, but those younger than 4 years of age, with high levels of caries, and whose care is funded by Medicaid were represented in very low numbers. The types of patients treated and procedures performed by the respondents were significantly (P < or = .05) associated with the intensity of the respondents' educational experiences, except for the number and types of Medicaid patients they treated. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the vast majority of general practitioners treat children in their practices, but there still are groups of children for whom access to dental care is a problem. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Very young children, children with high levels of caries and Medicaid-covered children have difficulty finding dental care in the general practice community.     

Dentists' attitudes towards mouthguard protection.

PURPOSE: This study analyzed the attitudes of Virginia general dentists, orthodontists, and pediatric dentists towards mouthguard protection. METHODS: Questionnaires were constructed and mailed to 2500 dentists in Virginia. RESULTS: In this survey, 97% of orthodontists, 84% of pediatric dentists, and 67% of general dentists recommended mouthguard protection for their athletically active patients. The two main reasons for not recommending mouthguards were that the patient could obtain one from a less expensive source than the dental office and the dentist had not received formal training on fabrication or use of mouthguards. More recent graduates were more likely to have been taught mouthguard use and fabrication during their dental training. General dentists (59%) and pediatric dentists (56%) recommended the custom mouthguard while orthodontists recommended the prefabricated stock type (77%) as their primary choice of mouthguard. A majority of general dentists (58%), orthodontists (81%), and pediatric dentists (76%) recommended mouthguard protection for the contact sport of basketball which presently is a non-mandated mouthguard sport. CONCLUSION: Most dentists agree that athletically active patients require mouthguard protection. Many dentists, however, question whether they were the ones responsible for distributing and fabricating the mouthguards.     

Opinions on the provision of dental care in Iowa nursing homes

Using a stratified random sample, a questionnaire was mailed to 400 practicing dentists and 200 directors of nursing (DONs). Response rates were 58.3% for dentists and 50% for DONs. Dentists were representative of Iowa dentists, with 85% male, mean age 49.1 years, and 22.4 years in practice. All DONs were female, with mean age of 44.9 years. Of the participating dentists, 86% had provided dental care for nursing home residents, but the majority of care was completed in dental offices. Three‐quarters of dentists were somewhat/not interested in nursing home dentistry. Dentists and DONs held common perceptions of the most frequent problems related to care provision at nursing homes: low financial reimbursement, especially for Medicaid patients; no portable dental equipment; no suitable area for dentistry; dentist's preference to treat patients at their dental practice; and transportation of residents to a dental practice. Dentists and DONs had some differing perceptions about oral health care (p < .01). Minimal dental care was provided on‐site at Iowa nursing homes.     

Reimbursement rates and policies for primary molar pit-and-fissure sealants across state Medicaid programs

BackgroundLittle is known about Medicaid policies regarding reimbursement for placement of sealants on primary molars. The authors identified Medicaid programs that reimbursed dentists for placing primary molar sealants and hypothesized that these programs had higher reimbursement rates than did state programs that did not reimburse for primary molar sealants.MethodsThe authors obtained Medicaid reimbursement data from online fee schedules and determined whether each state Medicaid program reimbursed for primary molar sealants (no or yes). The outcome measure was the reimbursement rate for permanent tooth sealants (calculated in 2012 U.S. dollars). The authors compared mean reimbursement rates by using the t test (α = .05).ResultsSeventeen Medicaid programs reimbursed dentists for placing primary molar sealants (34 percent), and the mean reimbursement rate was $27.57 (range, $16.00 [Maine] to $49.68 [Alaska]). All 50 programs reimbursed dentists for placement of sealants on permanent teeth. The mean reimbursement for permanent tooth sealants was significantly higher in programs that reimbursed for primary molar sealants than in programs that did not ($28.51 and $23.67, respectively; P = .03).ConclusionsMost state Medicaid programs do not reimburse dentists for placing sealants on primary molars, but programs that do so have significantly higher reimbursement rates.Practical ImplicationsMedicaid reimbursement rates are related to dentists' participation in Medicaid and children's dental care use. Reimbursement for placement of sealants on primary molars is a proxy for Medicaid program generosity.     

Appointment-keeping behavior of Medicaid-enrolled pediatric dental patients in eastern Iowa

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the appointment-keeping behavior of Medicaid-enrolled pediatric dental patients in three Eastern Iowa practices. METHODS: During the month of October 1998, a tally was kept of all patient appointments at a private pediatric dental office, a public health dental clinic, and a university-based pediatric dentistry clinic. Patients were categorized as either Medicaid or non-Medicaid. Appointment behavior categories were defined as: On time; Failure; Late-notice Cancellation (less than 24 hours notice); and Tardy (greater than 10 minutes). The data was entered in SPSS and analyzed using the chi square statistic. Statistical significance was P < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1,406 appointments were recorded for all three sites. Overall, patients on Iowa Medicaid had higher appointment failure, late-notice cancellation, and tardiness rates than non-Medicaid patients at all three clinics. However, these differences were only statistically significant for the private office and the university-based clinic. Failed appointment rates for Medicaid patients were much higher at the private office (38%) than at the other two sites. CONCLUSION: Consistent with anecdotal reports from dentists, Medicaid patients had higher rates of broken appointments than did non-Medicaid patients, particularly in a private practice setting.     

Patients with special health care needs in general and pediatric dental practices in Ontario

The objective of this study was to determine the involvement of Ontario's general and pediatric dentists in providing care to patients with special health care needs (PSHCNs). A questionnaire was developed and sent to a randomly selected sample of general dentists and to all pediatric dentists in Ontario; response rates were 52% and 90%, respectively. Most general dentists and all pediatric dentists reported that they provided a full range of dental services to PSHCNs. Most (80%) general dentists treat PSHCNs of all ages, whereas 60% of pediatric dentists report only treating PSHCNs up to the age of 18 years. A majority of both groups report treating PSHCNs whose dental care is paid through various government-funded programs. Most general dentists received training in the treatment of PSHCNs in undergraduate dental school, and 40% reported taking continuing education courses in this area. Most pediatric dentists received this training during their advanced dental specialty training, and 29% reported taking continuing education courses in this area. The results of this survey appear to demonstrate that general and pediatric dentists in Ontario provide a full range of dental services to PSHCNs, treat patients with a variety of disabilities and of all ages and are interested in pursuing continuing education that focuses on the delivery of dental care to PSHCNs. However, the results may be inaccurate because of question design flaws and responder bias among the 52% of surveyed general dentists who returned their questionnaires.     

Practices and opinions of pediatric and general dentists in Connecticut regarding the age 1 dental visit and dental care for children younger than 3 years old

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the percentage of general and pediatric dentists in Connecticut that were aware of, and practice, the current AAPD guidelines for the age one dental visit and to determine the services they provide to 0-2-yr-old patients. METHODS: A survey was mailed to Connecticut general and pediatric dentists seeking information on practice type, years in practice, training, ages of children seen, procedures performed and opinions regarding the age one dental visit. RESULTS: The response rate was 42% for general dentists and 84% for pediatric dentists, giving a sample of 113 and 60 dentists, respectively. All responding pediatric dentists reported seeing 0-2-yr-olds as compared to 42% of general dentists. Although not statistically significant, general dentists who were female or in practice less than 10 years were more likely to see 0-2-yr-olds. The majority of pediatric dentists reported performing all procedures surveyed, however, only just over half of general dentists provided topical fluoride or restorative care. Among pediatric dentists, 98% were aware of the AAPD guidelines and 92% agreed with them compared to 41% and 45% of general dentists respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all Connecticut pediatric dentists are caring for 0-2-yr-olds compared to 42% of Connecticut general dentists.     

Access to appropriate dental care.

For this review, publications were considered in the context of a broad definition of access to dental care, including the ability to gain available, appropriate services as determined by personal, economic, cultural, geographic, and other factors. None of the studies fully integrated the multiple dimensions explicit in this definition. Nonetheless, it is clear that certain segments (ie, the poor and members of racial and ethnic minoritites) of the US population use dental services less frequently. When these people do use the system, they are less likely to receive preventive services and more likely to have a dental emergency. The availability of services to poor populations through Medicaid programs is compromised due to low provider participation, which is attributed to dissatisfaction with reimbursement rates and limitations in the breadth of covered services. Concerning the appropriateness of care, it is shown that practices with homogenous patient populations vary widely in the rates of the types of services provided.