Dynamic Transperineal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pelvic Floor Disorders

PURPOSE: Defecating proctography and more recently, magnetic resonance imaging have both been used for diagnosis in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of dynamic transperineal ultrasound in a range of specific disorders affecting evacuation. METHODS: A protocol of sagittal and transverse transperineal imaging was established defining the infralevator viscera and soft tissues and the margins of the puborectalis muscle. Dynamic measurements were possible for the extent of puborectalis shortening, the anorectal angle, and the movement during straining of the anorectal junction. Calculations were made of the depth of demonstrated rectoceles, the posterior urethrovesical angle, and the movement of the urethrovesical junction. Diagnoses were confirmed by proctography (where appropriate) and clinical examination. RESULTS: Transverse images of the anal sphincter were comparable with those obtained using endoanal ultrasonography. Sagittal images permitted the measurement of puborectalis contraction and the anorectal angle comparable with those obtained during defecography. Cystoceles were able to be diagnosed during closure of the posterior urethrovesical angle and abnormal urethrovesical junction descent during straining. Rectoceles, peritoneoceles, enteroceles, and rectoanal intussusception were readily identified using dynamic transperineal ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound is a simple, noninvasive way to assess dynamically the interaction of the pelvic viscera and their relationship to the pelvic floor musculature in patients with evacuatory disorders and pelvic floor dysfunction.     

Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Defecating proctography has been traditionally used to assess patients with evacuatory dysfunction. More recently, dynamic transperineal ultrasound has been described, defining the interaction between the infralevator viscera and the pelvic floor at rest and during straining. This study compared qualitative diagnosis and quantitative measurement obtained by defecography and dynamic transperineal ultrasonography in patients with evacuatory difficulty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three women were examined using both techniques with both examiners blinded to the results of the other method. Quantitative measurement was made of rectocele depth, anorectal angle (at rest and during maximal straining) and anorectal junction position at rest and movement during straining. RESULTS: There was good agreement for the diagnoses of rectocele, rectoanal intususseption, and rectal prolapse. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound was more likely than defecography to make multiple diagnoses or to diagnose an enterocele when a rectocele was present. There was no difference noted between the two techniques for the measurement of anorectal angle at rest, anorectal junction position at rest, or anorectal junction movement during straining. The mean anorectal angle during straining was 123.3+/-4.3 degrees as measured by defecography and 116.4+/-3.3 degrees as measured by dynamic transperineal ultrasound, nearly reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound is a simple and accurate technique for assessment of the pelvic floor and soft-tissues in patients with evacuatory dysfunction.     

Is anorectal endosonography valuable in dyschesia?

AIMS: Dyschesia can be provoked by inappropriate defecation movements. The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate dysfunction of the anal sphincter and/or the musculus (m.) puborectalis in patients with dyschesia using anorectal endosonography. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with a medical history of dyschesia and a control group of 20 healthy subjects underwent linear anorectal endosonography (Toshiba models IUV 5060 and PVL-625 RT). In both groups, the dimensions of the anal sphincter and the m. puborectalis were measured at rest, and during voluntary squeezing and straining. Statistical analysis was performed within and between the two groups. RESULTS: The anal sphincter became paradoxically shorter and/or thicker during straining (versus the resting state) in 85% of patients but in only 35% of control subjects. Changes in sphincter length were statistically significantly different (p<0.01, chi(2) test) in patients compared with control subjects. The m. puborectalis became paradoxically shorter and/or thicker during straining in 80% of patients but in only 30% of controls. Both the changes in length and thickness of the m. puborectalis were significantly different (p<0.01, chi(2) test) in patients versus control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Linear anorectal endosonography demonstrated incomplete or even absent relaxation of the anal sphincter and the m. puborectalis during a defecation movement in the majority of our patients with dyschesia. This study highlights the value of this elegant ultrasonographic technique in the diagnosis of "pelvic floor dyssynergia" or "anismus".     

Anismus: Fact or fiction?

PURPOSE: Although anismus has been considered to be the principal cause of anorectal outlet obstruction, it is doubtful whether contraction of the puborectalis muscle during straining is paradoxical. The present study was conducted to answer this question. METHODS: During the first part of the study, we retrospectively reviewed 121 patients with constipation and/or obstructed defecation (male:female, 10/111; median age, 51 years). All of these patients underwent electromyography (EMG) of the pelvic floor and the balloon expulsion test (BET) in the left lateral position. Evacuation proctography was performed in all of these patients in the sitting position. Both the posterior anorectal angle and the central anorectal angle were measured. EMG and BET were also performed in ten controls (male:female, 4/6; median age, 47). In 147 patients with fecal incontinence (male:female, 24/123; median age, 58) only EMG activity was recorded. Criteria for anismus during straining were increase or insufficient (<20 percent) decrease of EMG activity, failure to expel an air-filled balloon on BET, and decrease or insufficient (<5 percent) increase of anorectal angle on evacuation proctography. Between June 1994 and March 1995, we conducted a second prospective study in a consecutive series of 49 patients with constipation and/or obstructed defecation and 28 patients with fecal incontinence. Both groups were compared with 19 control subjects. In this study, all three tests were performed. EMG and BET were performed both in the left lateral position and in the sitting position. RESULTS: The retrospective study was undertaken by comparing the constipated patients with the incontinent patients and the controls, and the anismus detected by EMG was found in, respectively, 60, 46, and 60 percent. Failure to expel the air-filled balloon was observed in 80 constipated patients (66 percent) and in 9 control subjects (90 percent). Based on posterior anorectal angle and central anorectal angle measurements, anismus was diagnosed in, respectively, 21 and 35 percent of constipated patients. In the prospective study, none of the tests showed significant differences regarding the prevalence of anismus between the two subgroups of patients and the control subjects. The prevalence of anismus only differed between constipated and incontinent patients when the diagnosis was based on BET in the sitting position (67 vs.32 percent;P <0.005). Our study shows that contraction of the puborectalis muscle during straining is not exclusively found in patients with constipation and/or obstructed defecation. The three tests most commonly used for the diagnosis of anismus showed an extremely poor agreement. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, we doubt the clinical significance of anismus.     

Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography in 10 asymptomatic volunteers

AIM: Evaluation of the wide range of normal findings in asymptomatic women undergoing dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) defecography.METHODS: MR defecography of 10 healthy female volunteers (median age: 31 years) without previous pregnancies or history of surgery were evaluated. The rectum was filled with 180 mL gadolinium ultrasound gel mixture. MR defecography was performed in the supine position. The pelvic floor was visualized with a dynamic T2-weighted sagittal plane where all relevant pelvic floor organs were acquired during defecation. The volunteers were instructed to relax and then to perform straining maneuvers to empty the rectum. The pubococcygeal line (PCGL) was used as the line of reference. The movement of pelvic floor organs was measured as the vertical distance to this reference line. Data were recorded in the resting position as well as during the defecation process with maximal straining. Examinations were performed and evaluated by two experienced abdominal radiologists without knowledge of patient history.RESULTS: Average position of the anorectal junction was located at -5.3 mm at rest and -29.9 mm during straining. The anorectal angle widened significantly from 93° at rest to 109° during defecation. A rectocele was diagnosed in eight out of 10 volunteers showing an average diameter of 25.9 mm. The bladder base was located at a position of +23 mm at rest and descended to -8.1 mm during defecation in relation to the PCGL. The bladder base moved below the PCGL in six out of 10 volunteers, which was formally defined as a cystocele. The uterocervical junction was located at an average level of +43.1 mm at rest and at +7.9 mm during straining. The uterocervical junction of three volunteers fell below the PCGL; described formally as uterocervical prolapse.CONCLUSION: Based on the range of standard values in asymptomatic volunteers, MR defecography values for pathological changes have to be re-evaluated.     

Translabial ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor and anorectal function in women with defecatory disorders

This article shows how modern ultrasound imaging can contribute to the investigation of patients with posterior vaginal wall prolapse, obstructed defecation, fecal incontinence and rectal intussusception/prolapse, conditions that should be similarly relevant and of interest to colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists and gynecologists. Translabial/perineal ultrasound, a simple, universally available technique, may serve as a first-line diagnostic tool in women with posterior compartment prolapse and/or symptoms of obstructed defecation, largely replacing defecation proctography and magnetic resonance proctography. This has advantages for healthcare systems, since sonographic imaging is less expensive, non-invasive, less time-consuming and does not involve radiation exposure. However, there is a substantial need for teaching that remains unmet to date. This article illustrates in details the technique of translabial ultrasonography adopted by our unit and reviews the literature supporting this method of assessing pelvic floor and anorectal function in women with defecatory disorders.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders

OBJECTIVE: Endoanal ultrasound identifies anal sphincter anatomy, and evacuation proctography visualizes pelvic floor motion during simulated defecation. These complementary techniques can evaluate obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. Our aim was to develop a single, nonionizing, minimally invasive modality to image global pelvic floor anatomy and motion. METHODS: We studied six patients with fecal incontinence and seven patients with obstructed defecation. The anal sphincters were imaged with an endoanal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coil and endoanal ultrasound (five patients). MR fluoroscopy acquired images every 1.4-2 s, using a modified real-time, T2-weighted, single-shot, fast-spin echo sequence, recording motion as patients squeezed pelvic floor muscles and expelled ultrasound gel; no contrast was added to other pelvic organs. Six patients also had scintigraphic defecography. RESULTS: Endoanal ultrasound and MRI were comparable for imaging defects of the internal and external sphincters. Only MRI revealed puborectalis and/or external sphincter atrophy; four of these patients had fecal incontinence. MR fluoroscopy recorded pelvic floor contraction during squeeze and recorded relaxation during simulated defecation. Corresponding comparisons for angle change and perineal descent during defecation were not significant; only MRI, but not scintigraphy, identified excessive perineal descent in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic MRI is a promising single, comprehensive, nonradioactive modality to measure structural and functional pelvic floor disturbances in defecatory disorders. This method may provide insights into mechanisms of normal and disordered pelvic floor function in health and disease.     

Intrarectal pressures and balloon expulsion related to evacuation proctography.

Seventy four patients with constipation were examined by standard evacuation proctography and then attempted to expel a small, non-deformable rectal balloon, connected to a pressure transducer to measure intrarectal pressure. Simultaneous imaging related the intrarectal position of the balloon to rectal deformity. Inability to expel the balloon was associated proctographically with prolonged evacuation, incomplete evacuation, reduced anal canal diameter, and acute anorectal angulation during evacuation. The presence and size of rectocoele or intussusception was unrelated to voiding of paste or balloon. An independent linear combination of pelvic floor descent and evacuation time on proctography correctly predicted maximum intrarectal pressure in 74% of cases. No patient with both prolonged evacuation and reduced pelvic floor descent on proctography could void the balloon, as maximum intrarectal pressure was reduced in this group. A prolonged evacuation time on proctography, in combination with reduced pelvic floor descent, suggests defecatory disorder may be caused by inability to raise intrarectal pressure. A diagnosis of anismus should not be made on proctography solely on the basis of incomplete/prolonged evacuation, as this may simply reflect inadequate straining.     

The spastic pelvic floor syndrome

In 12 patients with constipation, it was detected by defecography that, during straining, the anorectal angle did not increase, but remained at 90 degrees. These patients were unable to excrete barium. since the anorectal angle is a measure of activity of the pelvic floor musculature, a dysfunction of this muscle was suspected. In order to determine whether this abnormality represented a true functional disorder or just a voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles due to embarrassment, we performed electromyographic, manometric, and transit time studies in these patients. The electromyographic studies confirmed the persistent contraction during defecation straining. Both manometry and electromyography revealed normal muscle function at rest and during squeezing. Colonic transit time studies demonstrated rectal retention in nine of 12 patients, indicating outlet obstruction. Persistent contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, for which we propose the name “spastic pelvic floor syndrome,” represents a functional disorder of normal pelvic floor muscles, causing a functional outlet obstruction. Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Diego, California, May 5 to 10, 1985.     

Transperineal ultrasound compared to evacuation proctography for diagnosing enteroceles and intussusceptions

Introduction

This study concerns the level of agreement between transperineal ultrasound and evacuation proctography for diagnosing enteroceles and intussusceptions.

Method

In a prospective observational study, 50 consecutive women who were planned to have an evacuation proctography underwent transperineal ultrasound too. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value, as well as the positive and negative likelihood ratio of transperineal ultrasound were assessed in comparison to evacuation proctography. To determine the interobserver agreement of transperineal ultrasound, the quadratic weighted kappa was calculated. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to show the diagnostic capability of transperineal ultrasound.

Results

For diagnosing intussusceptions (PPV 1.00), a positive finding on transperineal ultrasound was predictive of an abnormal evacuation proctography. Sensitivity of transperineal ultrasound was poor for intussusceptions (0.25). For diagnosing enteroceles, the positive likelihood ratio was 2.10 and the negative likelihood ratio, 0.85. There are many false-positive findings of enteroceles on ultrasonography (PPV 0.29). The interobserver agreement of the two ultrasonographers assessed as the quadratic weighted kappa of diagnosing enteroceles was 0.44 and that of diagnosing intussusceptions was 0.23.

Conclusion

An intussusception on ultrasound is predictive of an abnormal evacuation proctography. For diagnosing enteroceles, the diagnostic quality of transperineal ultrasound was limited compared to evacuation proctography.     

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: a diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology

PURPOSE: Standard diagnostic proctologic procedures in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders include clinical evaluation and endoscopy. Particular aspects of combined pelvic floor disorders, especially those involving more than one pelvic compartment, may remain undetected without additional technical diagnostic procedures such as videoproctoscopy, cinedefecography, or colpocystodefecography. The aim of the study was to review the potentials of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography to elucidate the underlying anatomic and pathophysiologic background of pelvic floor disorders in proctologic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography was performed in 20 Patients (13 females) with main diagnoses such as rectal prolapse or intussusception, rectocele, descending perineum, fecal incontinence, outlet obstruction, and dyskinetic puborectalis muscle after clinical evaluation. The investigation was performed on a 1.5 T-magnetic resonance imaging machine in supine position. The rectum was filled with Gd-DTPA enriched ultrasound gel. First a T1/T2 weighted investigation of the pelvis was performed, followed by defecography with evacuation of the rectum. Images were obtained in a sagittal plane in a frequency of 1 image/second (true FISP) at rest and during straining. The obtained magnetic resonance imaging video tapes were analyzed off-line with cinematographic evaluation of bladder base, uterus, and anal canal position in relation to the pubococcygeal line by a blinded radiologist. Investigation time was 20 minutes. RESULTS: In dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography of the pelvic floor, 12 patients with descending perineum, 10 rectoceles (10 females), 6 cystoceles (6 females), 4 enteroceles (4 females), 8 intussusceptions (5 females), and a dyskinetic puborectalis muscle in 3 males were detected. In 11 females and 3 males multifocal disorders were found, involving more than one compartment in females, whereas in males complex defects were restricted to the posterior compartment. Magnetic resonance imaging defecography revealed diagnoses consistent with clinical results in 77.3 percent and defects in addition to clinical diagnoses in combined pelvic floor disorders in 34 percent. CONCLUSIONS: In complex pelvic floor disorders, involving more than a single defect, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging represents a convenient diagnostic procedure in females and to a lesser extent in males, in particular in terms of dynamic imaging of pelvic floor organs during defecation. In addition to the clinical assessment, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging had clinical impact in proctologic and interdisciplinary treatment.Presented in part at the 116th German Congress of Surgery, 1999     

Are pelvic floor movements abnormal in disordered defecation?

Pelvic floor movements were assessed by videoproctography in 126 subjects: neuropathic fecal incontinence patients (n=44), chronic constipation patients (n =52), and controls (n=30). A significantly lower pelvic floor position at rest and a more obtuse anorectal angle were found in incontinent patients than in controls (P <0.01). constipated patients showed no significant difference from controls at rest. There was less pelvic floor movement during contraction in incontinent patients than in controls, indicating a flaccid, noncontractile pelvic floor in neuropathic incontinence. Movement during contraction in constipated subjects was also less than in controls. Changes in the pelvic floor position during straining were the same as in controls. These data indicate that the pelvic floor is flaccid and noncontractile in neuropathic fecal incontinence, which supports the concept of a progressive neuropathy involving the sacral outflow. Similar changes are not seen at rest in patients with constipation even though they have a long history of straining.     

Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty

We prospectively evaluated 36 patients who complained of chronic constipation and/or defecatory difficulties to determine the role of anorectal manometry and evacuation proctography in delineating the pathogenesis of these complaints. Twenty patients with constipation also underwent a colonic transit study with radioopaque markers, which identificd one group with normal transit (N=10) and another with slow transit (N=10). Nine of 36 patients (25%) had inappropriate puborectalis muscle contraction or exhibited weak expulsion efforts during evacuation proctography, and these correlated highly with poor rectal emptying of barium paste (20±6% vs 61±5% in patients with normal relaxation; P<0.01). However, poor rectal emptying did not correlate with the presence of high-grade intussusceptions, large rectoceles, anorectal angles at rest or with straining, rectal diameter, clinical features, or colonic transit. Moreover, abnormal expulsion patterns as seen with anorectal manometry correlated poorly with the presence of inappropriate puborectalis contraction and decreased rectal emptying by proctography. Although anatomic abnormalities occurred frequently in patients with constipation and/or defecatory difficulties, they were also prevalent in asymptomatic controls. In view of these findings, surgical intervention to correct anatomic abnormalities in patients with constipation and/or defecatory difficulties should be considered only with great caution.     

Contribution of posture to the maintenance of anal continence

The anorectal angle (ARA) is believed to provide one of the most important contributions to anal continence. The normal resting angle is approx. 90 degrees, but the erect position may modify the ARA and other parameters usually considered in a proctometrogram. We compared the proctometrogram in different postures to elucidate the role of changes in the ARA in maintaining fecal continence. Sixty-three patients with constipation underwent static proctography. Variations in the ARA, perineal descent, puborectalis muscle length, and pubococcygeal distance were determined during resting, squeezing, and pushing with the patient in the Sims' position (SP); further evaluations used radiographs in resting position but with straight legs, in erect and sitting positions. The resting mean ARA was 95.3 +/- 15 degrees in SP and 79.8 +/- 14 degrees standing erect; the latter value was also significantly less during squeezing (84 +/- 11 degrees). The mean ARA during pushing was 118 +/- 16 degrees. A systematic and statistically significant difference in the mean resting ARA was demonstrated using the baseline of the rectal shape instead of the major rectal axis when measuring the anorectal angle. When sitting on a toilet, the mean resting ARA was significantly wider than in SP. The length of the puborectalis sling at rest did not change but was significantly reduced during squeezing and increased during pushing. The descent of the perineum at rest was near to 0 (-0.089 +/- 1.76 cm) in SP and significantly less when standing (-0.65 +/- 1.9 cm) and during squeezing (-0.97 +/- 1.7 cm). Perineal descent during pushing was +2.94 +/- 2.2 cm. The mean pubococcygeal distance did not change significantly in SP and in the erect position. The erect position thus contributes significantly to the maintenance of fecal continence by sharpening the ARA. This effect is stronger than any active contraction of the puborectalis muscle and is not related to shortening of the puborectalis sling but is secondary to lifting of the pelvic floor.     

Update of tests of colon and rectal structure and function

This review deals with the indications, methods, strengths, and limitations of anorectal testing in clinical practice. In chronic constipation, anal manometry and a rectal balloon expulsion test, occasionally supplemented by defecography, are useful to identify a functional defecatory disorder, because symptoms may respond to pelvic floor retraining. In patients with fecal incontinence, diagnostic testing complements the clinical assessment for evaluating the pathophysiology and guiding management. Manometry measures anal resting and squeeze pressures, which predominantly reflect internal and external anal sphincter function, respectively. Defecation may be indirectly assessed by measuring the recto-anal pressure gradient during straining and by the rectal balloon expulsion test. Endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify anal sphincter structural pathology, which may be clinically occult, and/or amenable to surgical repair. Only MRI can identify external sphincter atrophy, whereas ultrasound is more sensitive for internal sphincter imaging. By characterizing rectal evacuation and puborectalis contraction, barium defecography may demonstrate an evacuation disorder, excessive perineal descent or a rectocele. Dynamic MRI can provide similar information and also image the bladder and genital organs without radiation exposure. Because the measurement of pudendal nerve latencies suffers from several limitations, anal sphincter electromyography is recommended when neurogenic sphincter weakness is suspected.     

Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders

To evaluate the results and clinical impact of defecography in patients with anorectal disorders, 100 results of defecographic examinations from 92 patients were reviewed. The defecographic results were screened for the anorectal angle, defined both at rest and during straining, perineal descent, and abnormalities of the rectal configuration during straining. Anal manometry, saline infusion test, rectal capacity measurement, and anal electromyography (EMG) were also performed. There was a significant difference (P<0.001) both at rest (22°) and during straining (12°) between the two anorectal angle measurements. Incontinent patients had a larger anorectal angle, both at rest and during straining, than continent patients (P<0.04), but with a large overlap. The anorectal angle was not influenced by gender or age. An abnormal rectal configuration was found in 62 defecographic examinations. From the 8 patients with rectopexy performed for a large rectocele or intussusception, incontinent patients with an intussusception had the best results. In four patients, anal EMG showed an increased activity of the external sphincter during straining. Two of these four patients had abnormal defecograhic results. No correlations were found between anorectal angle and the other function tests. In conclusion, the anorectal angle lacks clinical relevance. In patients with defecation problems, defecography may be indicated whenever other investigations (physical examination, anal manometry, anal EMG) have excluded local pathology or a spastic pelvic floor syndrome. In these situations, defecography could detect an intussusception, which could easily be treated with rectopexy.Read in part at the meeting of the Dutch Society of Gastroenterology, Noordwijkerhout (The Netherlands), March 25 to 26, 1988.     

Observer variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle

Determination of the anorectal angle (ARA) and the position of the pelvic floor is, theoretically, very important in understanding the mechanisms of anorectal continence and defaecation. The variability in the measurement of the ARA was analyzed. Nine experts drew the rectal axis either as a line along the posterior wall of the distal rectum or as the central axis of the rectal lumen on the outlines of 18 representative proctographic images. The standard deviations and ranges of the mean values of each ARA were comparable but large in both methods. On average, the S.D. was 8° and the range value about 23°. Inter-observer variation was not related to the magnitude of the ARA, but rather to the anorectal configuration. Drawing a line along the posterior distal rectal wall is difficult when it is irregular or when the puborectalis impression is indistinct. The central rectal axis is difficult to draw when the junction between the upper and lower rectum is ill defined or when the outlines of the distal rectum are asymmetric e.g by the presence of a rectocele. Thus, the variability of both methods was not strongly interrelated (r=0.68 for the median values). It is concluded that, in general, radiologic assessment of the ARA is not reliable enough for comparative investigation of the dynamics of the anorectum.     

The spastic pelvic floor syndrome

To determine whether a persistent contraction of the pelvic floor muscle during straining, as observed in constipated patients during defaecography, was due to a conscious action of the patients or really represented a functional disorder, segmental colonic transit studies were performed in 24 patients in whom the diagnosis spastic pelvic floor syndrome was made. Abnormal segmental transit indicating outlet obstruction occurred in 92% of the patients. Four different types of segmental transit abnormalities were observed which suggested that the spastic pelvic floor syndrome involved a functional outlet obstruction leading to retrograde filling of the colon and severe straining. A causative relation with other anorectal abnormalities is suggested.     

Botulinum toxin type-A injection to treat patients with intractable anismus unresponsive to simple biofeedback training

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injection to the puborectalis and external sphincter muscle in the treatment of patients with anismus unresponsive to simple biofeedback training.METHODS: This retrospective study included 31 patients suffering from anismus who were unresponsive to simple biofeedback training. Diagnosis was made by anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, surface electromyography of the pelvic floor muscle, and defecography. Patients were given botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection and pelvic floor biofeedback training. Follow-up was conducted before the paper was written. Improvement was evaluated using the chronic constipation scoring system.RESULTS: BTX-A injection combined with pelvic floor biofeedback training achieved success in 24 patients, with 23 maintaining persistent satisfaction during a mean period of 8.4 mo.CONCLUSION: BTX-A injection combined with pelvic floor biofeedback training seems to be successful for intractable anismus.