Horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch

PURPOSE: Functional outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is improved by the construction of a colonic J-pouch. One disadvantage of this type of reconstruction is evacuation difficulty, which has been associated with large pouches. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the causes of evacuation difficulty in large pouches using pouchography. METHODS: The angle between the longitudinal axis of the pouch and the horizontal line (pouch-horizontal angle) on lateral pouchography was determined in 26 patients with 10-cm J-pouch reconstructions (10-J group) and 27 patients with 5-cm J-pouch reconstructions (5-J group). Measurement were made at three months, one year, and two years after surgery. Clinical function was evaluated using a questionnaire one year postoperatively. RESULTS: The pouch-horizontal angle in the 10-J group was significantly smaller than that in the 5-J group at all three time points. In both groups the pouch-horizontal angle at one year was significantly smaller than that at three months. There were no significant differences between the pouch-horizontal angles at one and two years. An evacuation difficulty was significantly more common in the 10-J group than the 5-J group. CONCLUSIONS: The evacuation difficulty observed in patients with large colonic J-pouch reconstructions may be attributed to the development of a horizontal inclination within one year of surgery.Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and a grant for Cancer Research from the Osaka Cancer Foundation.     

Misconceptions about the colonic J-pouch

INTRODUCTION: Since 1986 when the colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis was first described, it has gained increasing acceptance as the operation of choice for low rectal cancer surgery. However, there still exist several misconceptions about its use, namely anastomotic complications, alterations in anorectal physiology, and functional outcome. METHODS: All relevant articles derived from MEDLINE databases from 1986 to the present were reviewed. Emphasis was placed on reviewing the features that are claimed to make the colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis superior to a straight anastomosis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The colonic J-pouch has a role in ultra-low rectal cancer surgery, with an apparent reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leaks and reduced bowel frequency. Continence is unchanged and defecatory difficulties can be reduced by constructing a small pouch (< or =5 cm).     

Colonic J-pouch decreases bowel frequency by improving the evacuation ratio

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the functional outcome of ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer with colonic J-pouch reconstruction with that of straight reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-three patients who underwent ultra-low anterior resection with or without J-pouch reconstruction underwent bowel transit study, videodefecography, and answered a questionnaire survey 4 months and 1 year after surgery. Eleven healthy subjects underwent similar testing as controls. RESULTS: Patients with a J-pouch had less frequent stools than patients with straight reconstruction 4 months after surgery (p<0.05), but the two groups were similar at 1 year. Bowel transit time was similar at both study points. The evacuation ratio was higher after J-pouch than straight reconstruction 4 months after surgery (p<0.05). However, the ratio improved in the straight group, and no difference existed at 1 year. Colonic contraction was seen only near the anastomosis 4 months after surgery, but the contraction proximal to the anastomosis improved over the next 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: J-pouch reconstruction facilitates evacuation by improving the evacuation ratio. Although straight anastomosis caused excessive stool frequency 4 months after surgery, colonic function continued to improve and was comparable with J-pouch and straight reconstruction 1 year after surgery because the contraction ratio proximal to the anastomosis improved.     

Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis prevents a definitive stoma in patients with distal rectal cancer. However, imperative stool urge, stool fragmentation, prolonged stooling sessions, and minor problems of incontinence are frequently observed in the postoperative situation and negatively affect quality of life. Therefore, the colonic J-pouch was originally constructed to create a stool reservoir. In a randomized, prospective study, the short (5 cm) colonic J-pouch was tested for function and continence vs. straight coloanal anastomosis. METHODS: Over a period of 30 months, 74 consecutive patients (55 males) with rectal cancer in the lower and middle third of the rectum were included and randomized into two groups. Anastomosis was performed either as a coloanal or a colon-pouch-anal anastomosis. The standardized surgical procedure included mobilization of the left hemicolon, central ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and vein, preaortal lymph node dissection, autonomic nerve preservation, and total mesorectal excision. The anastomosis was performed at the upper anal canal or at the intersphincteric level. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and six months postoperatively for fecal continence, including sphincter manometry and defecation habits. In addition, quality of life was determined by use of a standardized questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC-QLQ-C30). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were randomized into each group. In general, problems with continence for liquids or gas occurred less frequently in the colonic J-pouch group 6 months after surgery. The frequency of bowel movements was lower in the J-pouch group (2.5 per day) than in the coloanal group (4.7 per day). Importantly, in a manometric study at the same postoperative point, neorectal capacity was decreased to a similar degree in both groups compared with the preoperative rectal volume. Thus, the expected and postulated reservoir effect could not be achieved by forming a 5-cm colonic J-pouch. CONCLUSION: The colonic J-pouch was superior with regard to continence for gas and liquids compared with a straight coloanal anastomosis. Furthermore, stool frequency was significantly lower in the J-pouch group than in the coloanal reconstruction group. However, because neorectal capacity decreased equally in both groups, we speculate that the advantage of the colonic J-pouch is not in the creation of a larger neorectal reservoir but rather may be related to decreased motility.     

Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch

AIM: This study was designed to analyze the functional and clinical outcomes of straight coloanal anastomosis compared with colonic J-pouch performed after low anterior resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 1989 and June 1996, all patients who underwent low anterior resection with anastomosis less than 4 cm from the dentate line were classified into two groups based on the restoration of intestinal continuity: “straight” coloanal anastomosis (n=39) or colonic J-pouch (n=44). Both groups were assessed according to the level of anastomosis, anastomotic complications (stricture, leak, pelvic abscess), age, and gender. For comparison of functional outcome, daily bowel movements, tenesmus, urgency, incontinence score (range, 0–20), and anorectal manometric findings were evaluated preoperatively and at six months, and one and two years after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups relative to age: (coloanal anastomosis, 66.3±10.1 (range, 46–86),vs. colonic J-pouch, 64.9±13.2 (range, 39–88) years); gender (females): (coloanal anastomosis, 46.2 percentvs. colonic J-pouch; 38.6 percent); diagnosis: (rectal carcinoma: coloanal anastomosis, 84.6 percent,vs. colonic J-pouch, 77.3 percent); preoperative incontinence score (coloanal anastomosis, 1.5±4.6,vs. colonic J-pouch, 1.1±4); bowel movements: (coloanal anastomosis, 2.1±2.3,vs. colonic J-pouch, 2.1±1.9/day); level of anastomosis: (coloanal anastomosis, 1.8±1.3,vs. colonic J-pouch, 1.5±1.3 cm from the dentate line); history of perioperative radiation therapy: (coloanal anastomosis, 15.4 percent,vs. colonic J-pouch, 20.5 percent); or manometric findings. There was also no significant difference in postoperative mortality: (coloanal anastomosis, 5.1 percent,vs. colonic J-pouch, 2.3 percent); or anastomotic complications: (coloanal anastomosis, 7/39 (17.9 percent),vs. colonic J-pouch, 2/44 (4.5 percent)P=0.08); strictures: (10.3vs. 0 percent); leaks: (5.1vs. 2.3 percent); bleeding: (2.6vs. 0 percent); rectovaginal fistula: (0vs. 2.3 percent). Also, in the colonic J-pouch group, two patients developed pouchitis, and one patient experienced difficult evacuation one year after surgery. There was a statistically significant better function judged by less frequent bowel movements (4±2vs. 2.4±1.3/day;P<0.005) and urgency (36.7vs. 7.7 percent;P<0.05), incontinence score (2.2±3.7vs. 0.8±1.6;P<0.05) up to one year after surgery. At two years, the coloanal anastomosis group did not show statistical improvement in functional results compared with one year postoperatively. Rectal compliance in manometric findings was significantly increased in the coloanal anastomosis group at one year after surgery (12.4±12.6vs. 4.2±1.5 ml/mmHg;P<0.05). However, these differences were less profound after two years. CONCLUSION: The functional superiority of the colonic J-pouch was greatest at one year after surgery. By two years, adaptation of the “straight” coloanal anastomosis yielded similar functional results. However, the almost fourfold reduction in anastomotic complications in the colonic J-pouch group reveals a second potential advantage of this technique.     

Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer

PURPOSE: The colonic J-pouch anastomosis has been advocated to obviate urgent and frequent defecations following a sphincter-saving rectal excision. Physiologic characteristics of the colonic J-pouch were compared with those of the traditional straight anastomosis and related to clinical function. METHOD: Patients with total mesorectal excision for carcinoma were randomized to either a straight (n=23) or a colonic pouch anastomosis (n=23). The patients were examined before and at one year after surgery (n=42), which included laboratory studies, and a questionnaire regarding anorectal function was completed. RESULTS: Preoperative compliance of the rectum was restored after surgery in the pouch group, 2.9 (2.2–3.4) ml/cm H ₂ O, but there was a significant decrease after surgery in the straight anastomosis group, 1.9 (1.1–2.3) P <0.001 (median (interquartile range)). Sphincter pressures in both groups were similar. In a multiple regression analysis, high compliance was associated with favorable clinical function, and hypermotility of the anal canal was associated with adverse clinical function. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic pouch-anal anastomosis restores neorectal compliance, which is important for good function after low anterior resection. Presence of an unstable internal sphincter is a negative factor for clinical function in both straight and pouch anastomoses.Supported by the Research Funds of the University Hospital in Linköping and the County of Östergötland.     

The blind colonic J-pouch: an original technique to reduce the surgical risk in the treatment of extra-peritoneal rectal cancer

Background Low and ultra-low anterior resection with colo-rectal or colo-anal anastomosis is accompanied by high frequency of postoperative anastomotic leakage. The aim of this report is to describe a novel technical approach to colorectal reconstruction. Materials and methods The innovative procedure introduces the principle of ‘no anastomosis–no leakage’, and it can be performed both laparascopically or by means of a laparotomy. It consists of a simple colo-rectal or colo-anal apposition with latero-terminal modality, with the creation of a colonic J-pouch called “blind” because it remains closed in the external site and the anus is sealed up. The surgery is completed with an exclusive derivative colostomy, and the reconstruction of the intestinal continuity is postponed to a second operation. Within 4–6 weeks from the first, the blind pouch is opened, the communication between the anus and the colon is established, and the colostomy is closed and reduced in the peritoneal cavity. Results and conclusions Ethics committee of our hospital approved the experimental program; actually, we are finishing the first step on 15 patients, and preliminary clinical results look like to be very good. The innovative methodology is here described in advance, and we pledge to spread clinical results in a subsequent report.     

Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch

PURPOSE: Functional outcome after low anterior resection with ultralow coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer is improved by construction of a colonic J-pouch vs. straight anastomosis. Optimum size of this pouch has yet to be determined. Therefore, we initiated a prospective, randomized trial using 5-cm and 10-cm pouches to determine this size. METHODS: Patients with tumors 5 to 10 cm from the anal verge were included in the study. Before a low anterior resection anastomosis was performed, patients were randomized to either a 5-cm J-pouch group (5-J group) or a 10-cm J-pouch group (10-J group). Functional assessments were performed one year postoperatively. Clinical functions were evaluated using a functional scoring system. Physiologic functions, such as sphincter and reservoir function, were evaluated by anorectal manometry and evacuation function by the balloon expulsion and saline evacuation tests. RESULTS: Forty patients among 43 randomized patients were assessed for functional outcome one year postoperatively (5-J group, n=20; 10-J group, n=20). The functional score was similar for the two groups, although reservoir function in the 5-J group was significantly less than in the 10-J group. Sphincter function was similar between the two groups. Evacuation function in the 5-J group was significantly superior to that in the 10-J group. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-cm J-pouch conferred adequate reservoir function without compromising evacuation.Supported, in part, by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science.     

Scintigraphic comparison of neorectal emptying between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis after stapled low anterior resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS. Colonic J-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection of the rectum has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of evacuation difficulty. Using scintigraphy we compared neorectal emptying after stapled low anterior resection between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We studied 19 patients after colonic J-pouch anastomosis and 22 after straight anastomosis. After the introduction of an artificial stool containing (99m)Tc-DTPA into the neorectum sequential lateral gamma images were obtained. From the time activity curve of radioactivity in the whole pelvis the time taken to evacuate one-half of the introduced artificial stool ( t(1/2)) and the percentage of artificial stool evacuated in 1 min (Evac(1)) were calculated. Fourteen volunteers were also studied as the reference group. RESULTS. The t(1/2) was significantly longer and Evac(1) significantly lower in patients after low anterior resection than in the reference group. t(1/2) was significantly longer in the pouch group than in the straight group. Anastomotic height was significantly correlated with both t(1/2) and Evac(1). Neither t(1/2) nor Evac(1) was correlated with the severity of impaired defecatory function. CONCLUSION. Although neither of the two parameters of neorectal emptying was correlated with the severity of impaired defecatory function, less effective neorectal emptying in patients after colonic J-pouch anastomosis than in those after straight anastomosis may be a factor causing evacuation difficulty after colonic J-pouch anastomosis.     

Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty

We prospectively evaluated 36 patients who complained of chronic constipation and/or defecatory difficulties to determine the role of anorectal manometry and evacuation proctography in delineating the pathogenesis of these complaints. Twenty patients with constipation also underwent a colonic transit study with radioopaque markers, which identificd one group with normal transit (N=10) and another with slow transit (N=10). Nine of 36 patients (25%) had inappropriate puborectalis muscle contraction or exhibited weak expulsion efforts during evacuation proctography, and these correlated highly with poor rectal emptying of barium paste (20±6% vs 61±5% in patients with normal relaxation; P<0.01). However, poor rectal emptying did not correlate with the presence of high-grade intussusceptions, large rectoceles, anorectal angles at rest or with straining, rectal diameter, clinical features, or colonic transit. Moreover, abnormal expulsion patterns as seen with anorectal manometry correlated poorly with the presence of inappropriate puborectalis contraction and decreased rectal emptying by proctography. Although anatomic abnormalities occurred frequently in patients with constipation and/or defecatory difficulties, they were also prevalent in asymptomatic controls. In view of these findings, surgical intervention to correct anatomic abnormalities in patients with constipation and/or defecatory difficulties should be considered only with great caution.     

老年右半结肠癌32例误诊原因分析

目的老年结肠癌发病率逐年增高，其右半结肠癌的误诊、漏诊率颇高，为提高其临床诊断率，对其误诊原因进行了分析。方法通过对１８８例老年右半结肠癌患者中入院时被误诊的３２例进行了临床分析。结果本组经手术证实的老年右半结肠癌３２例被误诊为缺铁性贫血１０例，胃肠道神经官能症６例，阑尾脓肿４例，慢性阑尾炎４例，下消化道出血２例，慢性胆囊炎２例，慢性胰腺炎、克隆病、肠结核及肠伤寒各１例，误诊时间３～２０个月。结论老年人由于其病理生理特点，右半结肠癌的临床表现往往不典型，因此对老年人不明原因贫血、消瘦、大便性状改变等进行规范的物理检查，钡灌肠、纤维肠镜等检查可减少误诊、漏诊的发生     

Relationship between the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and alcohol craving in alcohol-dependent patients: a longitudinal study

Background: A relationship between some hypothalamic–pituitary–related hormones and craving for alcohol has been suggested, leading to hypothesize a role of some hormones in the neurobiology of alcohol dependence. Investigating this association in alcohol‐dependent (AD) patients was the aim of this preliminary and exploratory study. Methods: Cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone, prolactin, thyroid‐stimulating hormone (TSH), free T3, free T4, growth hormone, follicle‐stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone as well as administering the Obsessive‐Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks in 25 current AD patients. Patients were treated with baclofen (10 mg t.i.d.) for these 12 weeks. Sixteen patients remained totally abstinent for 12 weeks. Results: At baseline, a significant inverse correlation was found between TSH and PACS (r = ?0.46; p = 0.022) and OCDS scores (r = ?0.53; p = 0.007). A significant direct correlation was found between free T3 and OCDS score (r = 0.44; p = 0.026). In the 16 abstinent patients, craving scores were significantly decreased at 12 weeks (p < 0.01). At 12 weeks, no significant correlation was found between TSH and craving, but free T3 remained directly correlated with OCDS score (r = 0.60; p = 0.013). Conclusions: A relationship between alcohol craving and free T3 and TSH was demonstrated in AD patients, suggesting the potential involvement of the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis in the neurobiology of alcohol craving.     

Can the longitudinal anatomical axis of the ventricles be estimated from the electrocardiogram?

The direction of the longitudinal anatomical axis of the ventricles was estimated from the orthodiagram in each of forty-five normal persons. Quite independently, the same estimate was made from the QRS complex of the electrocardiogram, taken in the same recumbent body position. The two series of estimates were then compared. It is concluded that the form of the QRS complex correctly indicates the direction of the anatomical axis in a large majority of normal persons.     

Rectocele repair improves evacuation and prolapse complaints independent of anorectal function and colonic transit time

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Evacuation disorders associated with a rectocele can be improved by rectocele repair. This study investigated whether anorectal function tests results change after rectocele repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with 2nd or 3rd degree rectocele and evacuation disorder were treated by posterior colporrhaphy and evaluated pre- and postoperatively (after 8 months, range 3-14) using questionnaires, anal manometry and endosonography, rectal barostat testing, and colonic transit time measurement with radio-opaque markers. Results from female controls were used for comparison. RESULTS: Preoperatively, rectocele patients had high maximal basal sphincter pressures, large sphincter lengths, and low maximal squeeze pressures, with an anal sphincter defect in seven and lower visceral sensitivity scores than in controls. Postprandial rectal responses (more than 10% decrease in postprandial volume after 1 h) were found in 3 of 14 patients compared to 2 of 11 parous and 9 of 11 nulliparous controls. After repair, a rectocele of 2nd degree was found in four patients. Questionnaire scores were significantly decreased for straining, evacuation disorder, manual support, and protrusion. Overall patient satisfaction with the operation scored 8.25 (range 3-10). Defecation frequencies and stool consistencies were unaltered. Anal pressures, rectal compliance-curves, visceral sensitivity, and colonic transit times were unaltered after the rectocele repair. CONCLUSION: Rectocele repair improved complaints of evacuation disorder and protrusion, but defecation frequency and stool consistency were not affected. Anorectal function was unaltered after rectocele repair. Selection of patients for rectocele repair should be performed based on evacuation and protrusion complaints, anorectal function, or colonic transit time measurements have a limited role.