Effect of budesonide enema on remission and relapse rate in distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticosteroid enemas are equally effective as 5-ASA enemas in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis (UC). With the introduction of budesonide, the risk of systemic side effects may be reduced. We investigated whether budesonide enema, 2 mg/100 ml, administered twice daily (b.i.d.) could increase the remission rate in comparison with the once daily (o.d.) standard regimen. Furthermore, we evaluated whether 2 mg budesonide enema, given twice weekly, could have a relapse preventing effect. METHODS: 149 patients with active distal UC were treated in a controlled, double-blind multicentre study with two parallel groups: placebo enema in the morning and budesonide enema in the evening (i.e. 2 mg/day) or budesonide enema b.i.d. (i.e. 4 mg/day) until remission (absence of clinical symptoms and endoscopic healing) or at most 8 weeks. Patients in remission were randomized to either budesonide enema or placebo enema twice weekly for 24 weeks or until relapse. RESULTS: The remission rates at 4 weeks were 33% for o.d. and 41% for b.i.d. regimens (NS) and correspondingly 51% and 54% at 8 weeks (NS). The b.i.d. group had an increased frequency of impaired adrenal function, 32% versus 4.8% (P = 0.001). The relapse rates during maintenance treatment with budesonide enema and placebo were 15% versus 24% after 8 weeks, 31% versus 27% after 16 weeks and 41% versus 51% after 24 weeks (NS). CONCLUSION: Budesonide enema 2 mg o.d. appears to be the optimal dosage in active distal UC. We could not show that budesonide enema twice weekly is sufficient to maintain remission.     

Effect of Budesonide Enema on Remission and Relapse Rate in Distal Ulcerative Colitis and Proctitis

Background: Glucocorticosteroid enemas are equally effective as 5-ASA enemas in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis (UC). With the introduction of budesonide, the risk of systemic side effects may be reduced. We investigated whether budesonide enema, 2 mg/100 ml, administered twice daily (b.i.d.) could increase the remission rate in comparison with the once daily (o.d.) standard regimen. Furthermore, we evaluated whether 2 mg budesonide enema, given twice weekly, could have a relapse preventing effect. Methods: 149 patients with active distal UC were treated in a controlled, double-blind multicentre study with two parallel groups: placebo enema in the morning and budesonide enema in the evening (i.e. 2 mg/day) or budesonide enema b.i.d. (i.e. 4 mg/day) until remission (absence of clinical symptoms and endoscopic healing) or at most 8 weeks. Patients in remission were randomized to either budesonide enema or placebo enema twice weekly for 24 weeks or until relapse. Results: The remission rates at 4 weeks were 33% for o.d. and 41% for b.i.d. regimens (NS) and correspondingly 51% and 54% at 8 weeks (NS). The b.i.d. group had an increased frequency of impaired adrenal function, 32% versus 4.8% ( P = 0.001). The relapse rates during maintenance treatment with budesonide enema and placebo were 15% versus 24% after 8 weeks, 31% versus 27% after 16 weeks and 41% versus 51% after 24 weeks (NS). Conclusion: Budesonide enema 2 mg o.d. appears to be the optimal dosage in active distal UC. We could not show that budesonide enema twice weekly is sufficient to maintain remission.     

Effect of weekend 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) enema as maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis: results from a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is known to be effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of 5-ASA enemas, as a maintenance therapy for UC, when administered twice weekly as a weekend treatment regimen, compared to daily oral 5-ASA alone. We hypothesized that the weekend enema therapy would be better tolerated by patients who worked or attended school. METHODS: Between January 2004 and August 2005, patients with UC, in whom remission of the condition had just been induced, were randomly assigned to either: the weekend 5-ASA enema group (n=11), who received 1 g 5-ASA enemas twice a week on Saturday and Sunday plus oral 5-ASA 3 g/day for 7 days, or to the daily oral 5-ASA use only group (n=13), who received only oral 5-ASA 3 g/day for 7 days. The primary endpoint of the study was defined as the incidence of relapse. The study was stopped after 24 patients had been enrolled because an interim analysis showed a significant benefit of the weekend 5-ASA enema group. RESULTS: In the weekend enema group, 2 patients (18.2%) had relapses compared with 10 (76.9%) in the oral 5-ASA only group. The multivariate hazard ratio of relapse associated with weekend 5-ASA enema, relative to the oral alone group, was 0.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the beneficial effects of adding weekend 1 g 5-ASA enema to daily 3 g oral 5-ASA as maintenance therapy for UC.     

Treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis with 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Twenty-five patients with active left-sided ulcerative colitis were randomly assigned to receive either 2 g of 4-aminosalicylic acid (para-aminosalicylic acid) or placebo in a 60-mL volume as a nightly retention enema. The duration of treatment was 8 weeks. Disease activity was assessed by grading clinical symptoms of blood, mucus, urgency, sigmoidoscopic findings, and degree of histologic inflammation in rectal biopsies. At 8 weeks, 10 of 12 patients (83%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55% to 97%) who received 4-aminosalicylic acid showed improvement in clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histologic variables. In contrast, only 2 of 13 patients (15%, 95% CI, 4% to 38%) who had received placebo showed clinical improvement (P less than 0.005). The 11 patients in the placebo group who showed no improvement were treated subsequently with open-label 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas. Of the 11, 9 showed clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histologic improvement. No adverse effects were seen. 4-Aminosalicylic acid enemas are a safe and effective means of treating left-sided ulcerative colitis.     

Optimum dosage of 5-aminosalicylic acid as rectal enemas in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), the active moiety of sulphasalazine (SASP), was given as a rectal enema to patients with mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis to determine the minimum effective dosage. A double blind study was carried out using enemas containing 1, 2, or 4 g or 5-ASA or placebo for a one month treatment period. One hundred and thirteen patients with ulcerative colitis attending our outpatient clinic volunteered to participate. Clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological assessments were carried out at the beginning of the study and after 15 and 30 days of treatment. All patients who received 5-ASA enemas showed significantly better results than those who received a placebo enema (p less than 0.001) but no difference was detected among the patients receiving differing concentrations of 5-ASA. This study suggests that 1 g 5-ASA (in a 100 ml enema) is a sufficient dosage for patients with a mild to moderate attack of ulcerative colitis.     

Maintenance Oral Sulfasalazine Prolongs Remission in Ulcerative Proctitis and Proctosigmoiditis

We have retrospectively compared the effectiveness of five different regimens for inducing and maintaining clinical remission in 206 patients with idiopathic proctitis (n = 115) and proctosigmoiditis (n = 91). The five therapeutic regimens were: corticosteroid enemas, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas, oral 5-ASA (sulfasalazine or mesalamine), corticosteroid enemas plus oral 5-ASA, or 5-ASA enemas plus oral 5-ASA. Clinical remission was achieved within 28 days of therapy in 47%, and eventually in 94% of these patients. No significant differences in efficacy were found among the five regimens. Most patients ultimately experienced a recurrence of symptoms, but the duration of remission was significantly longer with maintenance oral sulfasalazine or mesalamine (17.2 months) than with no therapy (11.8 months), P less than 0.01. We conclude that several regimens are equally effective in inducing remission of proctitis and proctosigmoiditis, although prolonged therapy may be needed to accomplish this goal. Maintenance oral 5-ASA significantly prolongs symptomatic remission in proctitis and proctosigmoiditis.     

5-Aminosalicylic Acid Enemas in Refractory Distal Ulcerative Colitis: Long-Term Results

In this trial, we examined the role of 4-g 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enema in the long-term management of patients with previously refractory distal ulcerative colitis. Of 20 such patients treated with nightly 5-ASA enemas, 16 improved symptomatically, with 15 achieving clinical remission and 14 achieving sigmoidoscopic remission within 3 to 5 wk. An attempt was made to maintain clinical remission with 5-ASA enemas in these 16 by successively decreasing the frequency of administration to every other night and then every third night, as long as remission was maintained. Relapses were treated by reinstituting nightly 5-ASA enema administration followed by another attempt at tapering the frequency of administration. Follow-up has ranged from 5 to 16 months. Nine patients were rapidly tapered to every third night administration, but six relapsed. Of these six, four were brought into remission with reinitiation of nightly enemas and tapered to every three nights, whereas one ultimately required enemas every two nights for control and one required enemas nightly (with mild symptoms). Six other patients relapsed when the enemas were tapered to every two nights, and after retreatment on a nightly regimen, four could be maintained on an every third night regimen while two have required every second night administration. One patient has required nightly administration from the outset. Currently, one patient is off all medication, while eight are on an every third night, three are on an every second night, and three are on a nightly schedule. We conclude that in patients with distal ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional therapy but responsive to 5-ASA enemas, relapse is common as the frequency of 5-ASA enema administration is decreased, although some patients may be maintained on a less than nightly schedule. The optimal maintenance regimen remains to be determined.     

Quantitative distribution of radiolabeled 5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis

Rectally administered suspensions of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) are topically effective in treating left-sided ulcerative colitis. The extent to which the contents of these enemas are distributed to inflamed mucosal linings has not previously been determined. This study was undertaken to validate a technique for labeling 5-ASA with^99mTc and to quantitate the distribution of [^99mTc]5-ASA in eight patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis. Eight patients underwent three colonic scintigraphic exams within five days, receiving a 60-ml radiolabeled 5-ASA enema into the unprepared rectum for each study, with sequential anterior abdominal images obtained for 4 hr. Activity within the rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, and ascending colon was quantitated. Over 50% of the labeled enema had advanced beyond the rectum in five of eight patients and in six of eight patients by 30 min and 60 min, respectively. The distribution of [^99mTc]5-ASA was quantitatively reproducible when repeated in the same patient on different days, despite apparent visual differences. By 2 hr, the amount of the enema present within the rectum decreased significantly (P<0.05) compared to the initial distribution. The amount of enema present within the descending colon was increased significantly at 0.5 hr (P< 0.05) and at 2 hr (P< 0.01). There were no significant changes in the distribution from initial values for the sigmoid, transverse, or ascending colon at any time. In each of these cases the spread of the enema to or beyond the extent of disease was documented. In patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis, small volume [^99mTc]5-ASA enemas reliably reach the area of inflammation.Supported by a grant from Reid-Rowell, Inc.     

Comparison of bismuth citrate and 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas in distal ulcerative colitis: a controlled trial.

An enema that contained a complex of bismuth citrate and polyacrylate was compared with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas for treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. The multicentre trial involving 63 patients was randomised and double blind with enemas given over four weeks; clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological assessments were made. Improvements were seen in both treatment groups. Clinical remission was seen in 18 of 32 patients treated with 5-ASA and 12 of 31 patients treated with bismuth citrate-carbomer (chi 2 1.94; p = 0.16). Sigmoidoscopic remission occurred in 20 of 32 patients in the 5-ASA group and 15 of 31 patients given bismuth (chi 2 1.27; p = 0.26). Improvement of rectal biopsy histology by at least one grade was seen in 16 of 32 patients in the 5-ASA group and 14 of 31 patients with bismuth (chi 2 0.15; p = 0.70). Analysis of covariance gave no significant difference between groups, although there was a trend favouring 5-ASA. There was no evidence of bismuth accumulation during the trial. Bismuth enemas may offer a new therapeutic option in distal ulcerative colitis.     

4-Aminosalicylic acid retention enemas in treatment of distal colitis

Forty-five of 47 patients with distal ulcerative colitis completed a two-week double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to determine if 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) enemas, 1 g bid or 2 g bid, were therapeutically effective compared to placebo. Forty-one patients enrolled because they were refractory to or had side effects during conventional therapy with sulfasalazine or corticosteroids. Proctoscopic examination was done before and after two weeks of treatment. Patients kept daily diaries assessing: (1) blood in stools, (2) mucus in stools, (3) tenesmus, (4) abdominal pain, (5) loss of appetite, (6) fatigue, (7) weight loss, and (8) malaise. Severity of each symptom ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). A total severity score was calculated from the above for each patient. At the end of the two-week study, 35 patients elected to take 4-ASA in an open-label trial for one year. 4-ASA enemas in the 1-g bid but not the 2-g bid dosage were significantly more effective in improving symptoms than placebo:P<-0.05. Neither dose of 4-ASA enema was better than placebo in improving the sigmoidoscopic appearance at the end of two-weeks. Forty-six percent of patients had complete resolution of all signs and symptoms in the open-label trial and 31% were better but still had sigmoidoscopic evidence of disease, a total response rate of 77%. Side effects were similar in the placebo and 4-ASA groups. We conclude that 4-ASA enemas in a dose of 1 g bid are safe and effective in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.Supported in part by Research Training Grant AM 07024 from the National Institutes of Health     

三种灌肠剂治疗左半结肠溃疡性结肠炎疗效观察

研究氢化可的松,对氨基水杨酸,水杨酸偶氮磺胺吡啶三种灌肠剂治疗左半结肠溃疡性结肠炎（ＵＣ）的疗效和安全性。方法用随机双盲对照方法对６２例ＵＣ病人分组治疗,以安慰剂为对照,疗程４周,观察临床症状,结肠镜和组织学炎症及疾病活动指数（ＤＡＩ）的改善情况。结果三种灌肠剂和对照组治疗后症状改善率分别为７５％、６８．７％、６８．７％和２１．４％（Ｐ〈０．０５）;结肠镜下炎症改善率下７５％、６８％、６１．５％和     

Better quality of therapy with 5-ASA colonic foam in active ulcerative colitis

We evaluated the efficacy, tolerance, and acceptance of a new 5-ASA colonic foam versus 5-ASA liquid enema in the short-term treatment of active ulcerative colitis in a three-week prospective, randomized, investigator-blind study, enrolling 233 patients from 12 outpatient clinics in Italy. In arm 1 of the study, 117 patients with mild attacks received 2 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. In arm 2, 116 patients with moderate attacks were given 4 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. End points were defined as complete relief of symptoms, and endoscopic and histological evidence of remission or improvement. In patients with mild relapse, 34 of 63 (54%) treated with foam were in clinical remission after only 10 days compared with 17 of 51 (31%) treated with enemas (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between foam (83%) and enema (74%) after three weeks. In patients with moderate relapse, a higher proportion of patients achieved complete clinical remission in the foam group (63%) compared with enema group (52%) after three weeks (difference 11%, 95% CI –7 to 29). No significant differences were observed in endoscopic and histological evaluation of colonic mucosa between treatment groups in either arm. 5-ASA foam was well tolerated. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Patient evaluation of therapy showed that foam was much better accepted than enema because foam was more comfortable, more practical, easier to retain, and interfered less with daily living. The results of this study suggest that 5-ASA foam may provide prompter remission of symptoms compared to liquid enema and it improves the quality of topical therapy in ulcerative colitis.This paper was presented in part at the Research Forum of the 92nd annual meeting of The American Gastrointestinal Association, New Orleans, May 18–24, 1991.The multicenter group included: M. Campieri, A. Belluzzi, G. Brunetti, P. Gionchetti, M. Miglioli, L. Barbara (Bologna); C. Prantera, A. Andreoli, E. Berto (Roma); P. Paoluzi, M.C. Di Paolo, A.O. Paoluzi (Roma); F. Pallone, F. Luzza (Catanzaro); M. Cottone, L. Oliva (Palermo); G. Bianchi Porro, S. Ardizzone, M. Petrillo (Milano); G. D'Albasio, G. Trallori (Firenze); G.C. Sturniolo, M.C. Montino (Padova); A. Pera, C. Barletti (Torino); R. de Franchis, G. Grandinetti, G.M. Meucci, M. Vecchi (Milano); P. Bianchi, M.C. Campanini, T. Ranzi (Milano); L. Capurso, C. Papi (Roma).Supported by a grant from Bracco and Giuliani (Milan, Italy).     

Long-term intermittent treatment with low-dose 5-aminosalicylic enemas is efficacious for remission maintenance in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: The standard remission maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC) is 5-amino-salicylic acid (5-ASA), given orally and topically and in different doses, with various frequencies and duration of administration. Both the efficacy of long-term intermittent therapy with low-dose 5-ASA enemas in preventing UC relapses and its economic implications were evaluated. METHODS: In accordance with a prospective case control study, 42 adult UC outpatients (29 M and 13 F) were treated with 5-ASA tablets (1.6 g/day) and 5-ASA enemas (2 g/50 mL) twice weekly, and 42 concurrent UC outpatients, matched for sex, age, extension and duration of disease, received only the oral therapy; the median treatment period was 6 years. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the number (42%: P = 0.034) and incidence of relapses (43%: P = 0.022) in the patients receiving combined oral + topical 5-ASA, who also had a significantly higher cumulative probability of not experiencing a first relapse (P = 0.001). There were no dropouts or side effects. Local therapy increased drug costs, but decreased the costs of relapses by 48% and completely precluded hospitalization costs. CONCLUSIONS: The scheduled oral + topical 5-ASA treatment, at the lowest cumulative topical dosage tested over the longest known observation period, is efficacious in improving clinical outcome and decreasing overall costs in UC patients.     

5-ASA enemas for refractory distal ulcerative colitis. An open trial

We conducted an open trial of 5-ASA enemas to determine the role of this drug in idiopathic distal ulcerative colitis resistant to conventional therapeutic approaches. Fifty-one such refractory patients were given 4 g 5-ASA enemas once nightly for 2 weeks, and the response was then assessed clinically and sigmoidoscopically. Overall, 29 patients (57%) had an excellent response, 11 (21%) had a satisfactory response, and a further 11 (21%) had a poor outcome. Two patients developed adverse reactions. Of the 11 patients with a poor response, nine remained dependent on oral prednisone for remission of their colitis. Although the role of 5-ASA enemas in the treatment of refractory distal ulcerative colitis remains to be determined, it appears that the drug appears to be beneficial for only a minority of patients dependent on systemic corticosteroids.     

Spread and distribution of 5-ASA colonic foam and 5-ASA enema in patients with ulcerative colitis

Rectal treatment with enemas, foams, and suppositories is the most efficient method of delivering an adequate quantity of locally active drugs to the distal colon. In a pilot study carried out by colonoscopy in four patients, it was observed that 4 g 5-ASA in 20 ml foam spread up or beyond the splenic flexure and more extensively than 2 g 5-ASA in 10 ml foam. Therefore we have undertaken a study in order to compare by scintigraphy the colonic distribution of 4 g 5-ASA foam versus 4 g 5-ASA in 100 ml liquid enemas in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis using a crossover randomized design. Both preparations were labeled with 100 MBq [^99mTc] sulfur colloid before administration. Anterior scans were taken at intervals for 4 hr. Activity, expressed as a percentage of total radioactivity, was measured in the rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, and ascending colon. Six patients had the same extent of spread with the two formulations; in three patients with foam and in one patient with enema a greater spread was observed. the foam reached the upper limit of disease in all cases, while enema failed in two cases. The maximum spread with foam was observed within 30 min in nine of 10 patients compared with seven of 10 after enema. Compared to enema, foam distributes more uniformly and seems to persist longer in the descending and sigmoid colon. The 5-ASA colonic foam shows some more favorable characteristics than enema for the local treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis.This work was supported in part by Bracco S.p.A (Milan, Italy).Part of this study was presented at the 92th Annual Meeting of The American Gastrointestinal Association, May 18–24, 1991, in New Orleans, Louisiana.     

5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas: effective agent in maintaining remission in left-sided ulcerative colitis

The efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas in maintaining remission in left-sided ulcerative colitis was studied. Twenty-five patients in remission for at least 2 mo were randomized to receive either 1-g 5-aminosalicylic acid or placebo enemas daily and were followed up for 1 yr. Eleven of 13 patients randomized to placebo relapsed after a mean of 16 wk. Nine of 12 patients randomized to 5-aminosalicylic acid remained in remission for 1 yr, 2 others in remission withdrew by request, and 1 relapsed at 10 wk. The difference between relapse rate on 1-g 5-aminosalicylic acid versus placebo was significant (p less than 0.005). Seven patients entered the blinded trial a second time. Three of 4 patients randomized to 5-aminosalicylic acid remained in remission and 1 relapsed. Three randomized to placebo relapsed at a mean of 14 wk. One-gram 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas are safe and effective in maintaining remission in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis.     

5-ASA in ulcerative colitis： Improving treatment compliance

5-aminosalicylic acid （5-ASA） compounds are a highly effective treatment for ulcerative colitis （UC）. While UC patient compliance in clinical studies is over 90%, only 40% of patients in every day life take their prescribed therapy. Adherence to medication has been emphasized recently by a Cochrane meta-analysis that has suggested that future trials of 5-ASA in UC should look at patient compliance rather than drug efficacy. Better compliance can be obtained by reducing the number of tablets and times of administration. Given that the 5-ASA formulations have different delivery systems that split the active moiety in various regions of the intestine, it is particularly important that an adequate dose of the drug arrives at the inflamed part of the colon. 5-ASA Multi matrix （MMx） is a novel, high strength （1.2 g）, oral formulation designed for oncedaily dosing. It releases the active moiety throughout the colon. Different studies with this compound have shown that it is as effective as 5-ASA enema in the treatment of mild-to-moderate, left-sided UC, and is comparable to a pH-dependent, delayed release 5-ASA （Asacol）, even if given once daily. Recently, the effectiveness in the acute phase of UC has been confirmed also in maintenance. In conclusion, at present, 5-ASA MMx seems theoretically the best agent for maintaining patient compliance, and consequently, treatment effectiveness.     

5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas in treatment of distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis in Canada

The efficacy and safety of 4 g 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas were assessed in 59 patients with ulcerative colitis involving up to 50 cm of their distal colon. Twenty-nine patients received 5-ASA and 30 received a placebo. There were 12 dropouts (five in the active and seven in the placebo group) during the study because of insufficient efficacy. After six weeks of therapy, 63% of the patients receiving the 5-ASA were considered to be “much improved” by the study physician compared to 20% patients on placebo (P<0.0001). A disease activity index (DAI), based upon patient symptoms and sigmoidoscopic appearance, was used to assess efficacy. Mean DAI declined 75% for patients on 5-ASA enemas and 32% for patients on placebo (P<0.05). The 5-ASA enemas are well tolerated and are of benefit in the treatment of ulcerative colitis confined to the distal colon.     

A prospective randomized double blind trial comparing prednisolone and 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas in acute distal ulcerative colitis

A prospective double blind and randomized study was conducted to compare 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) and prednisolone-21-phosphate enemas in inducing remission in patients with acute distal ulcerative colitis. Patients with ulcerative colitis distal to the splenic flexure as assessed by flexible colonoscopy, barium enema and histology were included in the study. Of 40 consecutive patients, 20 were randomized to each of the two treatment groups. Clinical evaluation was done weekly; sigmoidoscopy and histology were performed at entry and at the end of 4 weeks. Therapy was discontinued in four patients treated with prednisolone enemas due to worsening of symptoms. The clinical improvement was significant in the remaining patients (P less than 0.001) and was similar in the two groups (P greater than 0.1). Sigmoidoscopic and histological improvement were better with 4-ASA than with prednisolone enemas. No adverse effects were observed in any of the patients treated. The present study suggests that 4-ASA is a safe and effective treatment for inducing remission in acute distal ulcerative colitis.     

Ulcerative colitis: analyses of 116 cases (do extraintestinal manifestations effect the time to catch remission?)

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evaluation of clinical, demographic and epidemiologic features of ulcerative colitis and therapy response of these patients. METHODOLOGY: Retrospectively, 116 patients (64.7% female) were enrolled in this study. Mean age and mean follow-up period were 36+/-16, 5+/-2 years, respectively. RESULTS: The most common anatomic involvement was pancolitis (60.3%) and the others were as follows: left side 25%, rectum 13.8% and ileum (backwash ileitis) 0.9%. Extraintestinal manifestations were observed in 42.2% of patients (sacroiliitis 12%, primary sclerosing cholangitis 7.6%, pyoderma gangrenosum 2.4%, peripheral arthropathy 1.6%, autoimmune hepatitis 1.6%, steatosis 12.9%, gallstone 0.8%, perianal fistulas 0.8%, sagittal sinus thrombosis 0.8%, psoriasis 0.8%). Multiple extraintestinal manifestations were observed (primary sclerosing cholangitis + pyoderma gangrenosum) in 2 patients. Colonic perforation due to toxic megacolon was observed in only one patient during follow-up period. The mean period for remission was 3.7 months in 72% of patients with pancolitis by the treatment of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) (2-3 gr/day) + methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) +/- (for maintenance of remission) azathioprine (AZT) (1.5-2 mg/kg/day); 3.7 months in 72% of left-sided colitis by 5-ASA +/- corticosteroid enemas +/- methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) +/- (for maintenance of remission) AZT (1.5-2 mg/kg/day) and 3.7 months in 62.5% of patients with distal colitis by 5-ASA (p.o. +/- enema) +/- corticosteroid enemas. Colectomy was performed on 7 patients refractory to these treatments. Six patients (4 of them had pancolitis) were treated with cyclosporine (Cys) (4 mg/kg/day, p.o.). Only one patient, a non-responder to Cys therapy, had colectomy. The mean remission time was 4.7 months in 80.6% of patients with extraintestinal involvement and 3.2 months in 71.2% of patients without extraintestinal involvement (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy was generally enough for the treatment. Cys and/or surgery can be another choice for the patients that do not respond to the medical therapy. Extraintestinal manifestations do not change the remission rate, but prolong the time to catch remission.