Cilostazol treatment of claudication in diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of cilostazol in diabetic and non-diabetic patients from eight (six placebo- and two active-controlled) randomised, double-blind phase III trials. DESIGN: We only included patients from the trial data set receiving cilostazol 100 mg twice daily (216 diabetic/599 non-diabetic) or placebo (220/616). Efficacy was measured by absolute claudication distance (ACD), using standard treadmill exercise protocols. RESULTS: Among diabetic and non-diabetic patients, cilostazol was superior to placebo (estimated treatment effect 1.15, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.25, p = 0.001; and 1.24, 1.18-1.31, p < 0.0001, respectively). There was no statistical difference in response between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. In the efficacy analysis, cilostazol-treated diabetic subjects with the lowest baseline ACD (but not those with greater baseline ACD) walked approximately 34% farther than at baseline, whereas their non-diabetic counterparts walked 23% farther. There was no significant difference in the adverse event profile of the diabetic and non-diabetic patients on cilostazol. No excess haemorrhagic events occurred in cilostazol-treated diabetic patients. Trial duration varied from 12 to 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic and non-diabetic patients with intermittent claudication respond favourably to cilostazol, with no significant difference in their overall response. Diabetic individuals with the most severe claudication respond better than those less affected, but the response of non-diabetic patients increases as baseline ACD increases. Adverse event incidence was comparable in the two populations, although diabetic patients might be expected to experience greater morbidity. Cilostazol is a safe and effective treatment for claudication in diabetic and non-diabetic populations.     

Naftidrofuryl: a review of its use in the treatment of intermittent claudication

Naftidrofuryl (Praxilene) is a vasodilator that has been used in the treatment of intermittent claudication for >30 years in Europe to improve walking distance and provide symptomatic relief. However, earlier trials had inconsistencies in design and the clinical relevance of the treatment effect has been controversial. Recent randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, however, have generally been conducted in accordance with updated methodology guidelines. In these studies, naftidrofuryl 200mg three times daily improved pain-free and maximal walking distances and health-related quality of life by a significantly greater extent than placebo in patients with intermittent claudication. The magnitude of these effects appears to support claims that the effects of naftidrofuryl are clinically relevant in these patients.     

Cilostazol Treatment of Claudication in Diabetic Patients

Summary

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of cilostazol in diabetic and non-diabetic patients from eight (six placebo- and two active-controlled) randomised, double-blind phase III trials.

Design: We only included patients from the trial data set receiving cilostazol 100?mg twice daily (216 diabetic/599 non-diabetic) or placebo (220/616). Efficacy was measured by absolute claudication distance (ACD), using standard treadmill exercise protocols.

Results: Among diabetic and non-diabetic patients, cilostazol was superior to placebo (estimated treatment effect 1.15, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.25, p?=?0.001; and 1.24,1.18-1.31, p?<?0.0001, respectively). There was no statistical difference in response between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. In the efficacy analysis, cilostazol-treated diabetic subjects with the lowest baseline ACD (but not those with greater baseline ACD) walked approximately 34% farther than at baseline,

whereas their non-diabetic counterparts walked 23% farther. There was no significant difference in the adverse event profile of the diabetic and non-diabetic patients on cilostazol. No excess haemorrhagic events occurred in cilostazol-treated diabetic patients. Trial duration varied from 12 to 24 weeks.

Conclusions: Diabetic and non-diabetic patients with intermittent claudication respond favourably to cilostazol, with no significant difference in their overall response. Diabetic individuals with the most severe claudication respond better than those less affected, but the response of non-diabetic patients increases as baseline ACD increases. Adverse event incidence was comparable in the two populations, although diabetic patients might be expected to experience greater morbidity. Cilostazol is a safe and effective treatment for claudication in diabetic and non-diabetic populations.     

Cilostazol: a new drug in the treatment intermittent claudication

The most common symptom of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is intermittent claudication. The severity of PAD is closely related with the risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and death from vascular causes. Despite the higher prevalence of PAD, far less importance is given to its diagnosis and management. Patients with peripheral arterial disease should be offered secondary prevention strategies including aggressive risk factor modification and anti-platelet drug therapy. Cilostazol, a reversible, selective inhibitor of PDE III with antiplatelet, antithrombotic and vasodilatory effects, was approved by the FDA in 1999 for the treatment of Intermittent Claudication. It is believed that the collective pharmacology effect of cilostazol actually improves blood flow to the lower extremities. The efficacy of cilistazol has been demonstrated in eight Phase three clinical trials. Cilostazol is the first drug to consistently demonstrate clinical efficacy in many double-blind randomised control trials. It is indicated for the improvement of the maximal and pain-free walking distances in patients with IC, who do not have rest pain and who do not have evidence of peripheral tissue necrosis. In this review we highlight the role of Cilostazol in the management of peripheral arterial disease. The combined effect of aspirin with Cilostazol was recently patented.     

Cilostazol (pletal): a dual inhibitor of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase type 3 and adenosine uptake

Cilostazol (Pletal), a quinolinone derivative, has been approved in the U.S. for the treatment of symptoms of intermittent claudication (IC) since 1999 and for related indications since 1988 in Japan and other Asian countries. The vasodilatory and antiplatelet actions of cilostazol are due mainly to the inhibition of phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) and subsequent elevation of intracellular cAMP levels. Recent preclinical studies have demonstrated that cilostazol also possesses the ability to inhibit adenosine uptake, a property that may distinguish it from other PDE3 inhibitors, such as milrinone. Elevation of interstitial and circulating adenosine levels by cilostazol has been found to potentiate the cAMP-elevating effect of PDE3 inhibition in platelets and smooth muscle, thereby augmenting antiplatelet and vasodilatory effects of the drug. In contrast, elevation of interstitial adenosine by cilostazol in the heart has been shown to reduce increases in cAMP caused by the PDE3-inhibitory action of cilostazol, thus attenuating the cardiotonic effects. Cilostazol has also been reported to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro and has been demonstrated in a clinical study to favorably alter plasma lipids: to decrease triglyceride and to increase HDL-cholesterol levels. One, or a combination of several of these effects may contribute to the clinical benefits and safety of this drug in IC and other disease conditions secondary to atherosclerosis. In eight double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials, cilostazol significantly increased maximal walking distance, or absolute claudication distance on a treadmill. In addition, cilostazol improved quality of life indices as assessed by patient questionnaire. One large randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter competitor trial demonstrated the superiority of cilostazol over pentoxifylline, the only other drug approved for IC. Cilostazol has been generally well-tolerated, with the most common adverse events being headache, diarrhea, abnormal stools and dizziness. Studies involving off-label use of cilostazol for prevention of coronary thrombosis/restenosis and stroke recurrence have also recently been reported.     

Cilostazol and atherogenic dyslipidemia: a clinically relevant effect?

INTRODUCTION: Cilostazol is a reversible, selective inhibitor of PDE3A able to significantly improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication. However, beyond its antiplatelet and vasodilator properties, cilostazol seems to have significant effects on atherogenic dyslipidemia. AREAS COVERED: The effects of cilostazol on plasma lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins and postprandial lipemia are reviewed. A literature search (using Medline and Scopus) was performed up to 24 October 2010. The authors also manually reviewed the references of selected articles for any pertinent material. EXPERT OPINION: Cilostazol is able to significantly lower plasma triglyceride levels, with a concomitant increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations. Additional effects on pro-atherogenic lipoproteins and apolipoproteins include those on remnant-like particles, HDL subclasses, apolipoprotein B and postprandial lipemia. Cilostazol can improve the pro-atherogenic lipid profile in patients with peripheral arterial disease or type 2 diabetes. Further studies are needed to establish whether cilostazol treatment exerts clinically relevant effects on atherogenic dyslipidemia in high-risk patients.     

Comparison of the effects of cilostazol and milrinone on intracellular cAMP levels and cellular function in platelets and cardiac cells.

Cilostazol is a potent cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 3 (PDE3) inhibitor that was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of intermittent claudication. Its efficacy is presumed to be due to its vasodilatory and platelet activation inhibitory activities. Compared with those treated with placebo, patients treated with cilostazol showed a minimal increase in cardiac adverse events. Because of its PDE3 inhibitory activity, however, the possibility that cilostazol exerts positive cardiac inotropic effects is a safety concern. Therefore we compared the effects of cilostazol with those of milrinone, a selective PDE3 inhibitor, on intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in platelets, cardiac ventricular myocytes, and coronary smooth muscle cells. We also compared the corresponding functional changes in these cells. Cilostazol and milrinone both caused a concentration-dependent increase in the cAMP level in rabbit and human platelets with similar potency. Furthermore, cilostazol and milrinone were equally effective in inhibiting human platelet aggregation with a median inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.9 and 2 microM, respectively. In rabbit ventricular myocytes, however, cilostazol elevated cAMP levels to a significantly lesser extent (p < 0.05 vs. milrinone). By using isolated rabbit hearts with a Langendorff preparation, we showed that milrinone is a very potent cardiotonic agent; it concentration-dependently increased left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and contractility. Cilostazol was less effective in increasing LVDP and contractility (p < 0.05 vs. milrinone), which is consistent with the cardiac cAMP levels. The cardiac effect of OPC-13015, a metabolite of cilostazol with about sevenfold higher PDE3 inhibition, was similar to cilostazol. Whereas milrinone concentration-dependently increased cAMP in rabbit coronary smooth muscle cells, cilostazol did not have such an effect. However, both compounds increased coronary flow equally in rabbit hearts. Our results show that although cilostazol and milrinone both inhibit PDE3, cilostazol preferentially acts on vascular elements (platelets and flow). This unique profile of cilostazol is consistent with its beneficial and safe clinical outcomes in patients with intermittent claudication.     

Cilostazol and peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease is both common and disabling. Contemporary management of peripheral arterial disease is multimodal, encompassing both medical and interventional treatments. Cilostazol (Pletal), a 2-oxoquinolone derivative, is currently licensed in the UK for the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication to improve their walking distance in the absence of tissue necrosis or rest pain. The therapeutic effects of cilostazol are thought to be mediated through antiplatelet, antiproliferative and vasodilatory activities. This review aims to provide an overview of the management of peripheral arterial disease focusing upon cilostazol pharmacotherapy.     

Drug treatment of intermittent claudication

The US FDA has approved two drugs for the management of intermittent claudication: pentoxifylline and cilostazol. The mechanism of action that provides symptom relief with pentoxifylline is poorly understood but is thought to involve red blood cell deformability as well as a reduction in fibrinogen concentration, platelet adhesiveness and whole blood viscosity. The recommended dose of pentoxifylline is 400 mg three times daily with meals. Cilostazol is a potent, reversible, phosphodiesterase III inhibitor. The inhibition of phosphodiesterase allows for the increased availability of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). cAMP mediates many agonist-induced platelet inhibitory, vasodilatory and vascular antiproliferative responses. Cilostazol, at a dose of 100 mg twice daily, is recommended to be taken 30 minutes before or 2 hours after breakfast and dinner. In addition to pentoxifylline and cilostazol, clinical trials indicate many other drugs may relieve the symptoms of intermittent claudication. Ginkgo biloba, available as an over-the-counter extract, provides symptom relief comparable to pentoxifylline. Two European agents, naftidrofuryl and buflomedil, also have efficacy that is reported to be similar to pentoxifylline. Policosanol is a mixture of fatty alcohols derived from honeybee wax which, according to very limited data, reduces symptoms of claudication. Amino acids, certain peptides and prostaglandins may have a therapeutic role. Finally, novel approaches including angiogenesis mediated by growth factors, are currently under investigation.     

Cilostazol and peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease is both common and disabling. Contemporary management of peripheral arterial disease is multimodal, encompassing both medical and interventional treatments. Cilostazol (Pletal^?), a 2-oxoquinolone derivative, is currently licensed in the UK for the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication to improve their walking distance in the absence of tissue necrosis or rest pain. The therapeutic effects of cilostazol are thought to be mediated through antiplatelet, antiproliferative and vasodilatory activities. This review aims to provide an overview of the management of peripheral arterial disease focusing upon cilostazol pharmacotherapy.     

Cilostazol and atherogenic dyslipidemia: a clinically relevant effect?

Introduction: Cilostazol is a reversible, selective inhibitor of PDE3A able to significantly improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication. However, beyond its antiplatelet and vasodilator properties, cilostazol seems to have significant effects on atherogenic dyslipidemia.

Areas covered: The effects of cilostazol on plasma lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins and postprandial lipemia are reviewed. A literature search (using Medline and Scopus) was performed up to 24 October 2010. The authors also manually reviewed the references of selected articles for any pertinent material.

Expert opinion: Cilostazol is able to significantly lower plasma triglyceride levels, with a concomitant increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations. Additional effects on pro-atherogenic lipoproteins and apolipoproteins include those on remnant-like particles, HDL subclasses, apolipoprotein B and postprandial lipemia. Cilostazol can improve the pro-atherogenic lipid profile in patients with peripheral arterial disease or type 2 diabetes. Further studies are needed to establish whether cilostazol treatment exerts clinically relevant effects on atherogenic dyslipidemia in high-risk patients.     

Cilostazol and dipyridamole synergistically inhibit human platelet aggregation

It has been previously shown that cilostazol (Pletal), a drug for relief of symptoms of intermittent claudication, potently inhibits cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase type 3 (PDE3) and moderately inhibits adenosine uptake. It elevates extracellular adenosine concentration, by inhibiting adenosine uptake, and combines with PDE3 inhibition to augment inhibition of platelet aggregation and vasodilation while attenuating positive chronotropic and inotropic effects on the heart. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that cilostazol combined with a more potent adenosine uptake inhibitor, dipyridamole, synergistically inhibited platelet aggregation in human blood. In the presence of exogenous adenosine (1 microM), the combination of cilostazol and dipyridamole synergistically increased intra-platelet cAMP. Furthermore, cilostazol inhibited platelet aggregation in a washed platelet assay concentration-dependently with IC50s of 0.17 +/- 0.04 microM (P < 0.05 versus plus adenosine alone of 0.38 +/- 0.05 microM), 0.11 +/- 0.06 microM (P < 0.05), and 0.01 +/- 0.01 microM (P < 0.005) when combined with 1, 3, or 10 microM dipyridamole, respectively (n = 5). In whole blood, cilostazol (0.3 to 3 microM) and dipyridamole (1 or 3 microM) synergistically inhibited collagen- and ADP-induced platelet aggregation in vitro. Furthermore, the synergism was confirmed in an open-label, sequential study in healthy human subjects using ex vivo whole-blood collagen-induced platelet aggregation. Four hours after oral co-administration of cilostazol (100 mg) and dipyridamole (200 mg), platelet aggregation was inhibited by 45 +/- 17%, while no significant inhibition was observed from subjects treated with either drug alone. The combination may provide a potential treatment of arterial thrombotic disorders.     

Indobufen: an updated review of its use in the management of atherothrombosis

Indobufen inhibits platelet aggregation by reversibly inhibiting the platelet cyclooxygenase enzyme thereby suppressing thromboxane synthesis. Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of oral indobufen in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with or without atrial fibrillation, in the prevention of graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and in the treatment of intermittent claudication. In the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events indobufen 200 mg once or twice daily was significantly more effective than no treatment although not as effective as ticlopidine 250 mg once or twice daily, during 1-year nonblind clinical trials. Compared with placebo, indobufen 100 mg twice daily significantly reduced the risk of stroke in a small 28-month trial of patients at increased risk of systemic embolism (50% had atrial fibrillation). Furthermore, in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a recent cerebrovascular event enrolled in the 1-year Studio Italiano Fibrillazione Atriale (SIFA) trial, indobufen 100 or 200 mg twice daily was as effective as warfarin (titrated to produce an international normalised ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events; the incidences of the composite end-point of major vascular events (10.6 vs 9.0%) and recurrent stroke (5 vs 4%) were similar between treatments. In 2 large 12-month trials, the Studio Indobufene nel Bypass Aortocoronarico (SINBA) and the UK study, indobufen 200 mg twice daily was as effective as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) 300 or 325 mg plus dipyridamole 75 mg 3 times daily in the prevention of early and late occlusion of saphenous grafts in patients after CABG surgery. Indobufen 200 mg twice daily for 6 months significantly improved walking capacity compared with placebo, and caused a more pronounced improvement in both pain-free and total walking distance than either pentoxifylline 300 mg or aspirin 500 mg twice daily in separate 6- and 12-month studies of patients with intermittent claudication. Oral indobufen up to 200 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated in >5000 patients with atherosclerotic disease. Adverse events (predominantly gastrointestinal), reported by 3.9% of patients, rarely required withdrawal from treatment. In the SINBA and UK studies, fewer adverse events and less gastrointestinal bleeding were seen with indobufen than with aspirin plus dipyridamole treatment, while in the SIFA trial, noncerebral bleeding events occurred significantly less frequently in indobufen than warfarin recipients (0.6 vs 5.1%) and major bleeding events occurred only in the warfarin group. Conclusion: Indobufen is as effective as warfarin in the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, as aspirin plus dipyridamole in the prevention of CABG occlusion and may be more effective than aspirin or pentoxifylline in improving walking capacity in patients with intermittent claudication. The improved tolerability profile of indobufen (favourable gastric tolerance and reduced haemorrhagic complications) compared with aspirin 300 to 325 mg 3 times daily or warfarin, in addition to a similar antiplatelet effect, suggests indobufen can be considered a drug with a definite role in the management of atherothrombotic events. In particular, indobufen may be an effective alternative for at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation in whom anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or who are at higher risk of bleeding.     

Treatment of intermittent claudication with pentoxifylline and cilostazol.

The pathophysiology of intermittent claudication (IC) and the role of pentoxifylline and cilostazol for treating IC are discussed. IC, a result of inadequate blood flow to the musculature, is the primary symptom of occlusive peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Patients with IC often have a decreased quality of life because of mobility limitations. PVD is a sign of generalized atherosclerosis and increases the risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and increasing age may hasten the progression of PVD. Strategies for treating IC are aimed at improving symptoms and reducing the progression of atherosclerosis and include risk-factor modification, exercise, and antiplatelet therapy. Cilostazol and pentoxifylline are the only two drugs with FDA-approved labeling for use in treating IC. Both drugs have been shown to increase pain-free walking time and total distance walked, although there is some conflicting evidence for pentoxifylline. Cilostazol and pentoxi-fylline are fairly well tolerated; the most common adverse effects involve the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system. Inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes 3A4 and 2C19 should be used cautiously in patients taking cilostazol, and this drug is contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure. Cilostazol is more costly than pentoxifylline. Initiation of therapy with either pentoxifylline or cilostazol may be reasonable if risk-factor modifications, lifestyle changes, and antiplatelet therapy are not effective. The mainstays of therapy for IC are risk-factor modification, exercise, and antiplatelet therapy. If these prove inadequate, treatment with pentoxifylline or cilostazol may be reasonable.     

Controlled trial of suloctidil in intermittent claudication

Forty-five patients with intermittent claudication were first treated with placebo tablets for 3 months and then randomly allocated to double-blind therapy with either suloctidil or placebo for 6 months. Walking distance improved significantly in both groups during the 3 months of placebo treatment. During the 6 months of double-blind treatment with a further significant improvement occurred only in the placebo group when all patients were analyzed. However, when patients who stopped for reasons unrelated to claudication such as angina and exhaustion during repeated walking tests were eliminated, only suloctidil-treated patients improved significantly. The evolution of leg flow and distal pressure was similar in the two treatment groups whether all legs or only legs with abnormal flow and pressure values were considered. By contrast, when the analysis was limited to legs with claudication pain, a significant improvement occurred only in the suloctidil-treated group. These findings suggest that suloctidil may improve the claudication symptoms of patients with chronic arterial obstructive disease and in particular the perfusion of legs experiencing claudication pain. However, the clinical significance of this improvement appears limited.     

A controlled trial of pentoxifylline (Trental 400) in intermittent claudication: clinical, haemostatic and rheological effects

A formulation of pentoxifylline (Trental 400) has been claimed to increase claudication distance by improving red cell deformability and decreasing blood viscosity and platelet aggregation. In order to test this claim 30 stable claudicants recruited from one population took part in a double-blind randomised trial of placebo versus pentoxifylline. Both placebo and pentoxifylline treated patients improved subjectively and increased their claudication distance over the study period. Analysis of the blood results showed that the only apparent change was a tendency towards increased red cell filtration in the group treated with pentoxifylline; but no significant difference was found between claudicants and normal controls in the degree of red cell filterability nor did red cell filterability correlate with claudication distance. Pentoxifylline did not affect claudication distance or have any useful effect on blood flow properties, calling into question both its efficacy and suggested mode of action.     

前列地尔联合西洛他唑治疗2型糖尿病合并下肢动脉病变的临床观察

目的 观察前列地尔联合西洛他唑治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并下肢动脉病变(PAD)早期疗效.方法 86例T2DM合并PAD早期患者在血糖控制良好基础上(糖化血红蛋白＜7.0),给予静脉滴注前列地尔20μg/天,共3周;同时口服西洛他唑100mg,2次/天,连续6个月,治疗前后分别监测无痛行走距离和最大行走距离、踝/肱指数(ABI)及患者自觉症状及体征的变化.结果 联合治疗后患者无痛行走距离和最大行走距离、ABI均显著增加,间歇性跛行、下肢疼痛、麻木明显好转.结论前列地尔联合西洛他唑治疗2型糖尿病合并下肢动脉病变早期效果显著.     

Heparan sulfate in the treatment of intermittent claudication: results of a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled multicenter trial

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is by far the most common cause of intermittent claudication. This disease can greatly reduce the affected individual's walking capacity and can seriously affect daily life activities. Few therapeutic options are aimed at improving walking capacity. This was a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, performed in 24 Italian centers. Two hundred seventeen patients with intermittent claudication (stages IIa and IIb of Fontaine's PAD classification) were randomly assigned to heparan sulfate (40 mg orally twice a day) or placebo for 6 months. The primary end-point was an increase in pain-free walking distance [initial claudication distance (ICD)] during the 24 weeks of treatment. The pain-free and the absolute walking distance (ACD) were monitored by standardized treadmill test at baseline and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks. The change in initial claudication distance during treatment, expressed as integrated change over time, was significantly greater with heparan sulfate than with placebo (306 +/- 494 vs. 250 +/- 510 meters x months, p = 0.019). Significantly fewer treated patients worsened during treatment (decreased initial claudication distance) compared with controls (9.1% vs. 19.6%; p = 0.027). Functional recovery in the most severely affected subgroup of patients (stage IIb of Fontaine's classification) was more clearly detected and significantly greater among treated than among control patients (absolute increase in ICD: 70 +/- 113 vs. 58 +/- 172 meters, p = 0.028; integrated increase: 304 +/- 422 vs. 208 +/- 503 meters x months; p = 0.004). Heparan sulfate appeared to increase the walking capacity of patients with intermittent claudication to a significantly greater extent than did placebo. The treatment was well tolerated.     

Cost effectiveness of cilostazol compared with naftidrofuryl and pentoxifylline in the treatment of intermittent claudication in the UK

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness of cilostazol (Pletal) compared to naftidrofuryl and pentoxifylline (Trental) in the treatment of intermittent claudication in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a modelling study on the management of patients with intermittent claudication who are 40 years of age or above and have at least six months history of symptomatic intermittent claudication, secondary to lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. The study was performed from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: Clinical outcomes attributable to managing intermittent claudication were obtained from the published literature and resource utilisation estimates were derived from a panel of vascular surgeons. Using decision analytical techniques, a decision model was constructed depicting the management of intermittent claudication with cilostazol, naftidrofuryl and pentoxifylline over 24 weeks in the UK. The model was used to estimate the cost effectiveness (at 2002/2003 prices) of cilostazol relative to the other treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Starting treatment with cilostazol instead of naftidrofuryl is expected to increase the percentage improvement in maximal walking distance by 32% (from 57% to 75%) for a 12% increase in NHS costs (from 801 pounds sterling to 895 pounds sterling). Treatment with cilostazol instead of pentoxifylline is expected to increase the percentage improvement in maximal walking distance by 67% (from 45% to 75%) and reduce NHS costs by 2% (from 917 pounds sterling to 895 pounds sterling). Treatment with naftidrofuryl instead of pentoxifylline is expected to increase the percentage improvement in maximal walking distance by 27% (from 45% to 57%) and decrease NHS costs by 14% (from 917 pounds sterling to 801 pounds sterling). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of our model, starting treatment with cilostazol is expected to be a clinically more effective strategy for improving maximal walking distance at 24 weeks than starting treatment with naftidrofuryl or pentoxifylline and potentially the most cost effective strategy. Moreover, the acquisition cost of a drug should not be used as an indication of the cost effectiveness of a given method of care.