Pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX

Summary.  A survey of principal pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) plasma- and rDNA-derived concentrates, analysed by means of the PKRD program, has been performed. Notwithstanding the accurate definition of the study design, released in 1991 by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SSC-ISTH), a large variability of PK parameters has been pointed out. In the majority of the PK studies, the size of the population is small. In this situation, a careful individualization of haemophilia therapy is strongly recommended. The tailored prediction of loading and maintenance dosages and the need for strict control of trough FVIII/IX levels are mandatory not only to decrease the risk of bleeds but also to spare financial resources. Recently, the old problem of FVIII assay standardization has again become a concern among physicians, especially after the introduction of B-domain deleted rFVIII concentrate. The discrepancies between the widely used one-stage clotting assay and the chromogenic substrate assay seem to be solved by the introduction of a product-specific laboratory standard.     

Kinetics of factor IX activity differ from that of factor IX antigen in patients with haemophilia B receiving high-purity factor IX replacement

Pharmacokinetic studies in haemophilia B have found in vivo recovery of FIX (FIX) to be uniformly lower than the factor VIII recovery in haemophilia A. We hypothesized that this lower recovery could result from rapid binding to high-affinity receptors on platelets and endothelium. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the kinetics of FIX activity and protein in haemophilia B patients. Twelve patients were enrolled in a double dosing, crossover study with two high-purity FIX concentrates, AlphaNine SD and MonoNine. Subjects were given 40 U kg-1 of FIX concentrate and blood samples were taken at 15, 30, and 60 min. A second infusion of 40 U kg-1 was given after the 60 min blood sample and further blood samples removed at 15, 60, 120, and 360 min after the second dose. Patients were infused with the alternate concentrate at least 7 days later. Plasma samples were assayed for FIX activity by coagulation assay and antigen by RIA. FIX antigen in the infused concentrates was measured and quantified as microg U-1. There was no difference between the two FIX concentrates (AlphaNine vs. MonoNine) in the initial (15 min) activity (57% +/-1 19% vs. 53% +/-1 12%) and antigen (62% +/-1 16% vs. 55% +/-1 19%) recoveries. Recoveries after the second FIX dose were not statistically different than those observed after the first FIX dose. In one patient, a doubling of the initial infusion dose did not increase FIX recovery after the second FIX dose. However, the recovery of FIX antigen was significantly greater than the recovery of FIX activity and the differences became more significant in the post-15 min samples. We calculated a ratio of plasma FIX antigen to FIX activity in microg U-1. Average antigen to activity ratio increased from 5.8 +/-1 1.9 microg U-1 at 15 min to 7.1 +/-1 2.2 microg U-1 at 60 min. At 420 min the ratio increased to 9.3 +/-1 2.4 microg U-1. Although these studies failed to demonstrate a significant FIX receptor pool, they did demonstrate a phenomenon of progressive loss of biologic activity of the FIX protein after infusion of FIX concentrates.     

Prophylaxis in factor IX deficiency product and patient variation

To determine the dosing needed to maintain a prophylactic level of factor IX (FIX) >/=2%, 15 non-inhibitor severe (/=2%. Based on pharmacokinetic analysis the median amount of concentrate needed to maintain a prophylactic level >/=2% for 30 days when administered every third day is 677 IU kg(-1) pd-FIX (range 388-6005 IU kg(-1) pd-FIX) compared with 1168 IU kg(-1) r-FIX (range 268-13085 IU kg(-1) r-FIX). The median cost for 30 days of prophylaxis of an average 25-kg 8-year-old child at the current University of Iowa Price (0.87 US dollars Mononine/0.86 US dollars BeneFix as of December 2002) if given every third day would be 19,972 US dollars and 34,456 US dollars for r-FIX. However, because of wide inter-patient variability in recovery and half-life, pharmacokinetic evaluation of each patient is necessary to determine the appropriate dosing schedule and product best suited for prophylaxis.     

A study of reported factor IX use around the world

Summary. Replacement therapy has significantly improved the life expectancy and lifestyle of people with haemophilia. The objectives of this article were to study the reported factor IX (FIX) use on a country‐by‐country basis and address the following question: Does the reported FIX use vary by national economies? We obtained data on the reported number of international units (IUs) of FIX used for 90 countries from the Marketing Research Bureau and the World Federation of Hemophilia. Results show that the reported FIX use varies considerably across national economies, even among the wealthiest of countries.Trends suggest that the reported FIX usage increases with increasing economic capacity and has been increasing over time. Trends also suggest that consumption of FIX has been increasing at a greater rate in high income countries. Given these trends, there will likely be an overall increase in the amount of FIX concentrates used in the treatment of haemophilia B. We also found that FIX use both in terms of IUs per capita and IUs per person provide a complete picture of the level of haemophilia care within a country. Such information is critical for planning efforts of national healthcare agencies to determine realistic budget priorities and pharmaceutical manufacturers to determine adequate production levels of FIX concentrates. By improving the data collection and surveillance of FIX use for the treatment of people with haemophilia B, we can identify trends and needs of patients and highlight best treatment practices among countries.     

Vitronectin in clotting factor IX concentrates

Highly purified, plasma-derived factor IX (FIX) concentrates are produced in large part by a combination of anion exchange and heparin affinity chromatography. However, the concentrates still contain some accompanying proteins. The main impurity has turned out to be the adhesive glycoprotein, vitronectin. It occurs in concentrates exclusively in its multimeric form, in contrast to the situation in plasma. The multimeric vitronectin can be removed either by nanofiltration with a crossflow system or by size-exclusion chromatography. When these FIX concentrates are used as therapeutic agents, the fact has to be taken into account that considerable amounts of multimeric vitronectin are given to the patient. The physiological consequences of the dosage of this protein have not yet been investigated. Although no thrombogenicity has been reported in connection with the above-mentioned FIX concentrates, we recommend that the impurity should be removed from the preparation with the methods described here.     

Prophylactic dosing of factor VIII and factor IX from a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective

Summary.  The high cost and limited availability of factor concentrates make dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) a crucial issue in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. It has often been recommended that this treatment should aim to maintain a minimum plasma level of 1% of normal coagulation factor activity (FVIII:C or FIX:C). The dosage needed is commonly given as 25–40 U kg⁻¹ three times weekly for FVIII or twice weekly for FIX. However, these guidelines are valid only with several qualifications. First, the actual trough levels required may vary considerably between patients. The clinical severity of haemophilia may depend on more factors than the endogenous level of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Secondly, interindividual variations in dose requirements are also due to variance in the pharmacokinetics of the coagulation factors. Pharmacokinetic calculations are useful to design optimal dosing schedules to achieve required trough levels of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Moreover, tailoring of the dosing of FVIII or FIX according to their disposition in the individual patient can markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic treatment. However, the usefulness of in vivo recovery as a guide for prophylactic dosing seems questionable. It should be clearly understood that maintaining a certain trough level of FVIII:C or FIX:C is not an end in itself. Clinical outcome, not the achieved trough level, determines whether a dosage is adequate. Chiefly for economic reasons, the minimum effective dosage of coagulation factor should be determined and used in every patient. The dose requirement should also be re-evaluated at appropriate times.     

Epitope mapping of human factor IX inhibitor antibodies

Summary. We have determined the location of epitopes on the factor IX for three haemophilia B inhibitor antibodies (HB-1, HB-3, HB-7) and a monoclonal anti-factor IX inhibitory antibody (designated 65–10). The main binding region of HB-1, HB-3 and HB-7 was ¹⁵⁵YVNSTEAETI¹⁶⁴ (residues 155–164), ¹⁶⁷NITQSTQSFN¹⁷⁶ and ¹⁵⁶VNSTEAETI¹⁶⁴, respectively. The binding region of 65–10 was ¹⁶⁸ITQSTQSFNDFTRVV¹⁸², which included the cleavage site (¹⁸⁰R-V¹⁸¹) for activation by factor XIa. By neutralization experiments using two peptides, ¹⁵⁶VNSTEAETI¹⁶⁴ and ¹⁶⁷NITQSTQSFN¹⁷⁶, the degree of neutralization of anti-factor IX IgG purified by protein A was determined. Neutralization of three antibodies, HB-1, HB-3 and HB-7, in the presence of 10m m of the peptides ¹⁵⁶VNSTEAETI¹⁶⁴ was 30.1%, 0% and 10.8%, respectively, and in the presence of 4 m m of ¹⁶⁷NITQSTQSFN¹⁷⁶ it was 0%, 13.5% and 17.3%, respectively. On the other hand, when plasmas of patients instead of purified IgG were used for neutralization, 10 m m of ¹⁵⁶VNSTEAETI¹⁶⁴ and 4 m m of ¹⁶⁷NITQSTQSFN¹⁷⁶ failed to neutralize the inhibitor in the plasmas.     

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti‐FVIII or anti‐FIX antibodies of IgG₄ subclass best correlate with the presence of functional inhibitors. Improvements in inhibitor measurement have been recently introduced. Preanalytical heat treatment of patient specimens allows testing of patients without delaying treatment. Use of chromogenic and immunologic assays may aid in identification of false‐positive results, which are frequent among low‐titre inhibitors. Validated reagent substitutions can be used to reduce assay cost. New methods for defining assay positivity and reporting low‐titre inhibitors have been suggested. Challenges remain in the areas of quality control, assay standardization, monitoring of patients undergoing immune tolerance induction therapy and testing in the presence of modified and novel treatment products.     

Human factor IX inhibitors: immunochemical characteristics and treatment with activated concentrate

Summary Plasma was obtained from two patients with severe factor IX deficiency who had developed specific inhibitors of factor IX. Immunochemical characterization of the inhibitors by coagulation inhibitor neutralization assays and by immunoelectrophoretic methods demonstrated that both were IgG antibodies. One of the antibodies appeared to be monoclonal in origin with IgG subclass 4 heavy chains and lambda light chains. The other appeared to be oligoclonal and contained IgG subclass 1 and subclass 4 heavy chains and kappa and lambda light chains. One of the patients was treated with conventional, non-activated factor IX concentrate and with activated factor IX concentrate (Feiba) for repeated bleeding episodes. Administration of Feiba resulted in a progressive shortening of the kaolin cephalin clotting time and was followed by a good clinical response. Infusion of non-activated factor IX concentrate failed to induce clinical resolution of haemarthroses and had minimal effect on laboratory tests. The presence of circulating immune complexes could not be demonstrated in this patient.     

Combined factor IX and protein C deficiency in a child: Thrombogenic effects of two factor IX concentrates

We have recently described an unusual situation which involved a combination of a factor IX and a protein C deficiency in a young child who presented, according to the bleeding tendency, as a hemophilia B patient in this particular hemophiliac, baseline prothrombin fragment F₁₊₂ levels were unexpectedly elevated and increased after an injection of a very high purity factor IX concentrate. This observation raised a question regarding the substitution schedule in the case of repeated injections of factor IX, since the thrombotic tendency has been a major concern with some factor IX concentrates. We monitored factor IX, prothrombin fragment F₁₊₂ and D-dimer plasma levels before and during the 6 hr following the injection of an immunopurified factor IX concentrate. The results showed an increase in the F₁₊₂ levels after the factor IX injection, but an increase lower than previously observed with an ion-exchange chromatography-purified concentrate. Furthermore the F₁₊₂ level returned to baseline value 6 hr after administration. This factor IX concentrate seems to be best for use in the patient where repeated injections are involved (as employed during surgery). Moreover, the data point out the advantage of a monoclonal antibody-purified factor IX concentrate over less purified concentrates in a specific situation, with regard to the thrombogenic risk.     

Consequences of factor IX mutations in 26 families with haemophilia B

Haemophilia B is due to a variety of mutations within the factor IX gene. In the Seattle series, 26 additional unrelated families have had a mutation identified within the past 2 years. Of these, 11 were common recurrent point mutations identifiable by rapid restriction digest screening; eight of these probably represent founder mutations. 15 others were identified by sequencing amplified coding region fragments; eight are novel. Two each had frameshift and donor splice mutations and 11 had missense mutations. Five of these mutations associated with normal levels of circulating dysfunctional factor IX were computer modelled into coordinates for factor IXa.     

Recombinant factor IX: discrepancies between one‐stage clotting and chromogenic assays

New and modified recombinant factor IX (rFIX) products are in development and accurate potency estimation is important to ensure the consistency of production and efficacy of these therapeutics. Collaborative study data obtained during the replacement of the 3rd International Standard (IS) for FIX concentrate suggested that there was a discrepancy between potency estimates for rFIX using clotting and chromogenic methods, when the rFIX candidate was measured against the plasma‐derived FIX (pdFIX) IS. This study explores potential chromogenic and one‐stage clotting method discrepancies in more detail. Five batches each of rFIX and pdFIX were assayed against the 4th IS FIX concentrate (a pdFIX) by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) one‐stage clotting assay and specific functional chromogenic assay. The potency of rFIX by chromogenic assay was consistently around 70% of the one‐stage clotting potency (average 78 and 108 IU mL^?1 respectively). These differences were not observed with pdFIX, which had similar potencies (average 96 IU mL^?1) by each assay method. In addition, different APTT reagents yielded different potency estimates for rFIX when assayed against the pdFIX IS, with a variation of up to 23%. In all cases, the differences were largely resolved when a rFIX reference was used as the standard. This study highlights some of the challenges associated with assay of rFIX products in the laboratory and that careful consideration needs to be given to the choice of reference material used. This is especially important with the imminent arrival of new and modified rFIX products.     

In vivo recovery and half-life time of a steam-treated factor IX concentrate in hemophilia B patients

Summary Factor IX (FIX) recovery and half-life was measured in ten hemophilia B patients under standardized conditions. Each patient received a steam-treated high-purity factor IX concentrate at a dose of 19–39 U/kg body weight. FIX activity was determined using a one-stage assay, which was calibrated against the international concentrate standard (reagents from Immuno, Heidelberg). The in vivo recovery ranged from 24% to 53% (mean value 37.7%) and the half-disappearance time (HDT) from 8–30 h (mean 16.7 h). In four of the ten patients, the distribution and elimination half-lives were estimated and ranged from 0.3 h to 3.9 h (mean 1.4 h) and from 28.6 h to 39.7 h (mean 33.1 h), respectively. In six patients FIX was redetermined using a different FIX deficient plasma and a plasma standard (reagents from Merz & Dade, Munich, FRG). Recoveries and HDT based on the results obtained with this method were significantly higher (68.2% vs 39.7%; p<0.05), and longer (14.8 h vs 10.6 h; p<0.05), respectively. FIX activity was also measured by both assay systems in 100 healthy subjects (50 males, 50 females). The reagents from Immuno yielded a mean value of 0.77 U/ml, while the mean FIX activity utilizing standards and reagents from Merz & Dade was 1.11 U/ml (p<0.000001). The coefficient of correlation between the FIX activity measurements, as determined in 100 healthy subjects and 6 hemophilia B patients using the different test systems, was r=0.9 (N=159; y=0.08+1.3 * x; p<0.001). Our data suggest that recovery and HDT of factor IX concentrate strongly depend on the assay and calibration conditions and that an international FIX activity plasma standard is urgently required.     

Haemophilia B carrier detection by factor IX:C analysis; no impact of the type of mutation or severity of disorder

Haemophilia B, an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder characterized by lack or deficiency of factor IX, has been shown to be caused by any of a variety of DNA abnormalities (partial or total deletions, nonsense or missense mutations). Since in most countries carrier detection is based on factor IX coagulant activity (FIX:C) assay, this study was designed to determine whether carriers' FIX:C values are dependent on the severity of haemophilia (mild, moderate or severe) or on the genetic anomaly in the family. FIX:C concentrations were studied in 28 obligate carriers, 39 women known to carry the mutation and 33 verified noncarriers subgrouped by severity of disorder or genetic anomaly. No significant subgroup differences in FIX:C values were found, thus suggesting the level of FIX:C concentrations in carriers to be unaffected by the severity of haemophilia, or by its expression (i.e. deficient or dysfunctional factor IX). The specificity and sensitivity of FIX:C analysis for the purpose of carrier diagnosis was judged by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, where an FIX:C cut-off level of 75 IU dL-1 was found to be optimal (sensitivity 93% and specificity 88%).     

Comparison of the behavior of normal factor IX and the factor IX BM variant hilo in the prothrombin time test using tissue factors from bovine,human, and rabbit sources

A subset of hemophilia B patients have a prolonged bovine-brain prothrombin time. These CRM⁺ patients are classified as having hemophilia Bm. The prolongation of the prothrombin time has been reported only with bovine brain (referred to as ox brain in some literature) as the source of thromboplastin; prothrombin times determined with thromboplastin from rabbit brain or human brain are not reported to be prolonged. Factor IX from a hemophilia Bm patient (factor IX Hilo) was isolated. The activity of factor IX Hilo was compared to that of normal factor IX in prothrombin time assays when the thromboplastin source was of bovine, rabbit, or human origin. Factor IX, either normal or Hilo, prolonged a prothrombin time regardless of the tissue factor source. However, unless thromboplastin was from a bovine source, this prolongation required high concentrations of factor IX. Further, factor IX normal was as effective as factor IX Hilo in prolonging the prothrombin time when rabbit or human thromboplastin was used. With bovine thromboplastin, factor IX Hilo was significantly better than factor IX normal at prolonging the prothrombin time. The amount of prolongation was dependent on the amount of factor IX Hilo added. In addition, the prolongation was dependent on the concentration of factor × present in the sample. The prothrombin time changed as much as 20 seconds when the factor × concentration was varied from 50% to 150% to normal (fixed concentration of factor IX Hilo). These results demonstrate the difficulty of classifying the severity of a hemophilia Bm patient based on the bovine brain prothrombin time unless both the factor IX and factor × concentrations are known.