Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones

HYPOTHESIS: Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) offers the potential for accurate, noninvasive detection of common bile duct stones (CBDSs) before cholecystectomy, and for a consequent reduction in the incidence of preoperative negative diagnoses associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study: MRC results were correlated with ERC (high-risk patients) or intraoperative cholangiography (moderate-risk patients). SETTING: A university hospital providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care. PATIENTS: Seventy patients with suspected CBDSs scheduled to undergo elective cholecystectomy between April 15, 1997, and September 30, 1998. Forty patients were considered at high risk and 30 at moderate risk for CBDSs, according to results of liver function tests and sonograms of the upper abdomen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Confirmation or exclusion of CBDSs by MRC was assessed by a panel of radiologists who were unaware of the ERC results. Results of ERC and intraoperative cholangiography were analyzed by the investigating gastroenterologists or surgeon. RESULTS: Results of MRC were positive for CBDSs in 21 (52%) of 40 high-risk patients, a finding confirmed by preoperative ERC in 19 (90%) of 21 patients. Results of MRC were positive for CBDSs in 6 (20%) of 30 moderate-risk patients, all of which were confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography. Finally, CBDSs were present in 19 (48%) of 40 high-risk patients and 6 (20%) of 30 moderate-risk patients (P = .02). Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRC were 100% and 95.6%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 92.6% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiography is a reliable, noninvasive method for the detection or exclusion of CBDSs, and seems to reduce the frequency of negative diagnoses associated with ERC. Magnetic resonance cholangiography revealed no CBDSs in 19 (48%) of 40 patients at high risk for CBDSs. Thus, MRC-based diagnosis has the potential to reduce the number of invasive preoperative diagnostic procedures and their associated risks and overall health care costs.     

The biliary tract in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis

The biliary tract has been prospectively studied in a consecutive series of 769 patients undergoing surgery for gallstones to determine whether differences exist between subjects with and without a history of acute pancreatitis. The incidence of acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP) was 7.7 per cent and men with gallstones were significantly more likely to develop pancreatic inflammation. Operations on patients with AGP were accompanied by a higher mortality rate which was almost entirely due to the severity of the disease at the time of surgery. The earlier operations were performed after the onset of pancreatitis the more often stones were found in the common bile duct and at the ampulla. Patients with AGP had smaller and more numerous gallbladder stones in association with a wider cystic duct that controls. The common bile duct diameter in patients with AGP was independent of the presence of choledochal calculi implying either previous temporary obstruction to the biliary tree or a dilated duct ab initio. Pancreatic duct reflux was far more commonly observed on the cholangiograms of patients with AGP and in these patients reflux occurred into a wider pancreatic duct, at a greater angle and was associated with a longer functioning common channel. No patient developed recurrent pancreatitis following biliary surgery. These features strongly support the concept of gallstone migration and suggest that patients with gallstones who develop acute pancreatitis have essential differences in their biliary tree which mechanically facilitate migration of calculi.     

磁共振胆胰管成像在决定胆源性胰腺炎胆道探查中的指导作用

目的　探讨胆源性胰腺炎中磁共振胆胰管成像 (MRCP)在决定胆道探查中的作用。方法　回顾性分析 1995～ 2 0 0 2年间两阶段胆源性胰腺炎行胆道探查的病例资料 :1995～ 1999年 46例无MRCP检查 ,术前B超提示胆囊结石、胆总管结石及胆管扩张 ;2 0 0 0～ 2 0 0 2年 3 0例术前经MRCP检查提示胆囊结石、胆总管结石及胆管扩张或胆总管下段狭窄。结果　第一阶段术中探查及术后T管造影显示无结石 ,无胆总管下段梗阻或十二指肠乳头狭窄 2 8例 (60 .9% ) ;第二阶段术中探查及术后T管造影显示无结石 ,无胆总管下段梗阻或十二指肠乳头狭窄 7例 (2 3 .3 % )。第二阶段经MRCP指导的胆道探查阴性率较第一阶段明显为低 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论　胆源性胰腺炎应严格掌握胆道探查指征 ,术前MRCP检查可显著降低术中胆总管探查阴性率 ,MRCP有助于判断胆源性胰腺炎是否需行胆道探查。     

Effect of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy on outcome after gallstone pancreatitis

Acute gallstone pancreatitis has traditionally been managed by early cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). To evaluate the effect of IOC on patient outcome, we analyzed all patients operated on for acute gallstone pancreatitis at our institution over a 3-year period. A total of 200 patients (37 open, 163 laparoscopic) were evaluated. Nineteen of 34 patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were found to have common bile duct (CBD) stones. The 59 patients who underwent cholecystectomy with IOC had significantly longer operative times compared to the 141 patients who underwent cholecystectomy alone (167 vs. 105 minutes for open [P= 0.008] and 89 vs. 68 minutes for laparoscopic [P< 0.0001] operations). Of the 59 patients who underwent IOC, only nine (15%) had abnormal cholangiograms, and CBD exploration in seven revealed stones in four patients, edematous ampullae in two, and no abnormality in one. Six of eight patients (5 IOC, 3 no IOC) who required immediate postoperative ERCP were noted to have CBD stones. Patients who underwent IOC had significantly longer postoperative hospital stays (3.8 vs. 2.0 days [P= 0.007]). The incidence of retained CBD stones following surgery was similar (5.1% IOC, 2.8% no IOC). Although 7 of 122 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy without IOC were readmitted, only one was found on ERCP to have a retained CBD stone. Age, sex, preoperative days, procedure type, and biliary-pancreatic complications after discharge did not differ significantly between patients with and without IOC. We conclude that IOC in patients operated on for acute gallstone pancreatitis results in a longer operative time and a prolonged postoperative course, but has no effect on the incidence of retained CBD stones. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Huntington Beach, California, January 21–23, 2000.     

Definitive management of gallstone pancreatitis in England

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate whether definitive treatment of gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) by either cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy in England conforms with British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines and to validate these guidelines.

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics data were used to identify patients admitted for the first time with GSP between April 2007 and April 2008. These patients were followed until April 2009 to identify any who underwent definitive treatment or were readmitted with a further bout of GSP as an emergency.

RESULTS

A total of 5,454 patients were admitted with GSP between April 2007 and April 2008, of whom 1,866 (34.2%) underwent definitive treatment according to BSG guidelines, 1,471 on the index admission. Patients who underwent a cholecystectomy during the index admission were less likely to be readmitted with a further bout of GSP (1.7%) than those who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy alone (5.3%) or those who did not undergo any form of definitive treatment (13.2%). Of those patients who did not undergo definitive treatment before discharge, 2,239 received definitive treatment following discharge but only 395 (17.6%) of these had this within 2 weeks. Of the 505 patients who did not undergo definitive treatment on the index admission and who were readmitted as an emergency with GSP, 154 (30.5%) were admitted during the 2 weeks immediately following discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Following an attack of mild GSP, cholecystectomy should be offered to all patients prior to discharge. If patients are not fit for surgery, an endoscopic sphincterotomy should be performed as definitive treatment.     

Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis

Background

Gallstone pancreatitis is a consequence of ampullary obstruction by common bile duct (CBD) calculi. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been advocated for routine use to diagnose choledocholithiasis. However, the selective use of MRCP in clinically equivocal situations has not been explored until now. This study examines the diagnostic value of selective MRCP in gallstone pancreatitis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective audit of all presentations of gallstone pancreatitis between January 2001 and December 2007 at Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. Demographic data, clinical presentation, biochemical and radiological findings and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

There were 339 cases of gallstone pancreatitis during the study period; 236 patients were women and the mean age was 52 years. Overall, choledocholithiasis was diagnosed in 95 patients. A total of 117 patients underwent MRCP within a median of 4 days of admission, with 15 (13.7%) showing choledocholithiasis. There was no significant difference in time to MRCP between positive and negative groups. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) confirmed 13 of 15 stones within a median of 2.5 days. However, MRCP missed 8 cases of choledocholithiasis subsequently demonstrated on ERCP/IOC, where clinical suspicion remained after a negative MRCP. Its sensitivity was 62% and specificity 98%. The positive likelihood ratio was 6.5 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.1. In all, 222 patients followed different clinical pathways with 82 CBD stones diagnosed by ERCP/IOC.

Conclusion

Selective MRCP is highly specific in gallstone pancreatitis but may not be sensitive enough to exclude choledocholithiasis in this context.     

Value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease. Biliary injury during LC is still a serious problem. Knowledge of anatomic detail is important for not encountering the injury. Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is a noninvasive method for imaging the biliary ducts. However, MRC has many drawbacks such as not showing anatomic structures in detail and respiratory motion. In this study, contrast-enhanced MRC is used to show cystic ducts that are not seen by MRC. Reasons for patient referral for MRC and contrast-enhanced MRC included suspicion of cholecystolithiasis, adenomyomatosis, and gallbladder polyp. Our results show that routine MRC revealed cystic ducts in 38 patients (77.5%) and contrast-enhanced MRC in 46 patients (93.8%). Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was taken as gold standard for all patients. We found that contrast-enhanced MRC can provide a useful supplement to MRC in patients with nonvisualized cystic ducts by MRC. To our knowledge, this is the first study of visualization of cystic duct in patients undergoing LC depicted by both MRC and contrast-enhanced MRC.     

Value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease. Biliary injury during LC is still a serious problem. Knowledge of anatomic detail is important for not encountering the injury. Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is a noninvasive method for imaging the biliary ducts. However, MRC has many drawbacks such as not showing anatomic structures in detail and respiratory motion. In this study, contrast-enhanced MRC was used to show cystic ducts that are not seen on MRC. Reasons for patient referral for MRC and contrast-enhanced MRC included suspicion of cholecystolithiasis, adenomyomatosis, and gallbladder polyp. Our results show that routine MRC revealed cystic ducts in 38 patients (77.5%) and contrast-enhanced MRC in 46 patients (93.8%). Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was taken as gold standard for all patients. We found that contrast-enhanced MRC can provide a useful supplement to MRC in patients with cystic ducts not seen on MRC. To our knowledge, this is the first study of visualization of a cystic duct in patients undergoing LC depicted by both MRC and contrast-enhanced MRC.     

Evolving management of mildtomoderate gallstone pancreatitis

The objective of this study was to describe recent trends in the management of mild-to-moderate gallstone pancreatitis and assess patient outcomes. Acute gallstone pancreatitis has traditionally been managed with open cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiography during the initial hospitalization. The popularization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has made a reassessment necessary. Two consecutive time periods were retrospectively analyzed: prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (prelaparoscopic era [PLE]) and after the diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (laparoscopic cholectomy era [LCE]). There were 35 patients in the PLE group and 58 in the LCE group. LCE patients waited 37.1 +63 days from admission until cholecystectomy, compared to 9.8 +14.8 days in the PLE group (P = 0.04). Biliary-pancreatic complications occurred in 24% of LCE patients and only 6% of PLE patients (P = 0.05), nearly always while they were awaiting cholecystectomy (P = 0.009). Patients in either time period who underwent cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography developed less pancreatic-biliary complications than those who underwent ERCP prior to cholecystectomy, with or without sphincterotomy. Delaying the interval from pancreatitis to laparoscopic cholecystectomy beyond historical values is associated with a greater risk of recurrent biliary-pancreatic complications, which are not prevented by the use of ERCE Early cholecystectomy with intraoperative ductal evaluation is still the approach of choice. Drs. J.S. Barkun and A.N. Barkun are Chercheurs Cliniciens Boursier of the Fonds de la Recherche en Sant6 du Qurbec. Dr. S.M. Mehta is the recipient of an American Digestive Health Foundation/American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Training Award.     

Endoscopic management of gallstone pancreatitis.

The use of minimally invasive techniques of removing gallstones, and the gall-bladder, is an attractive option for patients who may be severely ill with pancreatitis. We describe here a patient with gallstone pancreatitis who was managed completely by endoscopic techniques consisting of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: The time required for air leak resolution after chest trauma is not well described. Based on an institutional review of posttraumatic air leaks our hypothesis was that video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for persistent posttraumatic air leak would decrease chest tube days and length of stay compared with nonoperative management. METHODS: Patients were offered VATS versus nonoperative management when air leaks persisted longer than 3 days and the patients were otherwise ready for discharge. Chest tube days and length of stay were recorded. RESULTS: Of 223 trauma patients requiring chest tubes, 50 had persistent air leaks, 39 of whom were otherwise ready for discharge. Twenty-five chose VATS and 14 nonoperative (NOP) treatment. The mean chest tube days was 8.1 for VATS versus 11.8 for NOP (P = 0.001). Mean length of stay was 9.7 days for VATS and 16.5 days for NOP (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients otherwise ready for discharge VATS reduces chest tube days and length of stay when used to treat persistent posttraumatic air leak.     

The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease

BACKGROUND: The application of available predictive scoring systems for the detection of common bile duct (CBD) stones has not reduced the number of patients who undergo unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The aim of this study was to create a predictive model for CBD stones and to assess the value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in prediction. METHODS: In 1998, 366 patients with gallstone disease (118 males, 248 females; mean age 57 (range 8-84) years) underwent cholecystectomy. Statistical analysis was performed on patient data obtained at the time of first presentation. RESULTS: CBD stones were demonstrated in 43 (12 per cent) of 366 patients. The predictive model for common duct stones included ultrasonography showing CBD stones or bile duct dilatation, age greater than 60 years, fever, serum alkaline phosphatase level above 670 units/l and serum amylase level above 95 units/l. In patients with a predicted probability greater than 5 per cent, CBD stones were present in 11 per cent, compared with 1 per cent in patients with a probability of 5 per cent or less. MRCP had an observed sensitivity of 95 per cent, specificity of 100 per cent, positive predictive value of 100 per cent and negative predictive value of 98 per cent. CONCLUSION: In patients with a predicted probability for CBD stones of more than 5 per cent, MRCP is recommended in order to confirm the presence or absence of stones and as guidance in further management.     

Development of gallstone pancreatitis. The role of the common channel

Whether bile reflux through a common channel into the pancreatic duct is a causative factor in the development of gallstone pancreatitis is controversial. To address this issue, we have reviewed a consecutive series of cholecystectomies performed with intraoperative cholangiograms. The cholangiograms and the patients' charts were reviewed independently to determine the incidence of a common channel in patients both with and without pancreatitis and to analyze their clinical courses. The group of patients who had pancreatitis showed a common channel in 19 (90%) of 20 cases, while those patients who did not have pancreatitis showed a common channel in 23 (35%) of 66 cases. The patients who had pancreatitis were less likely to have choledocholithiasis than were those patients who did not have pancreatitis, and these patients were less likely to require exploration of the common bile duct.     

The role of Chiba-needle cholangiography in the diagnosis of possible acute pancreatitis with cholelithiasis.

In patients with suspected severe acute pancreatitis and known or suspected cholelithiasis, it may be extremely difficult to exclude the diagnosis of gangrenous cholecystitis or obstructive cholangitis by nonoperative means. Since early intra-abdominal surgery has, in our experience, led to markedly increased morbidity in patients with gallstone pancreatitis, non-operative visualization of the biliary tree by percutaneous transhepatic Chiba-needle cholangiography (PTCNC) has been evaluated in 14 patients with suspected acute pancreatitis in whom life-threatening acute biliary disease could not be excluded by other nonoperative means. The final diagnosis was acute pancreatitis in nine patients (Group A) (mean serum amylase 3242 SU%) and acute biliary disease with hyperamylasemia in five patients (Group B) (mean serum amylase 2084 SU%). PTCNC made visualization of the biliary system possible in all patients and excluded the diagnosis of cystic duct or common duct obstruction in each case. Following PTCNC, potentially hazardous early laparotomy was avoided in eight of nine Group A patients. Biliary surgery was undertaken on day 3 to 13 in four Group B patients. When early laparotomy may be needed to evaluate or treat possible life-threatening acute biliary disease but is considered undesirable because of possible acute pancreatitis. PTCNC appears to be a safe and effective nonoperative method of obtaining precise anatomical delineation of the biliary tree.