Long-term results of the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma with cladribine (2-CDA) alone (95-80-53) or 2-CDA and rituximab (N0189) in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to test cladribine (2-CDA) alone and in combination with rituximab in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). METHODS: Patients with MCL were treated on 2 sequential trials. In Trial 95-80-53, patients received 2-CDA as initial therapy or at relapse. In Trial N0189, patients received combination 2-CDA and rituximab as initial therapy. In both trials, 2-CDA was administered at a dose of 5 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 every 4 weeks for 2 to 6 cycles, depending on response. In Trial N0189, rituximab 375 mg/m2 was administered on Day 1 of each cycle. RESULTS: Results were reported for 80 patients. Twenty-six previously untreated patients and 25 patients who had recurrent disease with a median age of 68 years received single-agent 2-CDA. The overall response rate (ORR) was 81% with 42% complete responses (CRs) in the previously untreated group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 7.2-22.1 months), and 81% of patients remained alive at 2 years. The ORR was 46% with a 21% CR rate in the recurrent disease group. The median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.6-13.1 months), and 36% of patients remained alive at 2 years. Twenty-nine eligible patients with a median age of 70 years received 2-CDA plus rituximab. The ORR was 66% (19 of 29 patient), and the CR rate was 52% (15 of 29 patients). The median duration of response for patients who achieved a CR had not been reached at the time of the current report, and only 3 of the patients who achieved a CR developed recurrent disease at a median follow-up of 21.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: 2-CDA had substantial single-agent activity in both recurrent and untreated MCL, and the results indicated that it may be administered safely to elderly patients. The addition of rituximab to 2-CDA may increase the duration of response.     

Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) following successful treatment of systemic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL): a case series

Management of PCNSL occurring after successful treatment of systemic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) is poorly defined. Illustrate a treatment approach for PCNSL following prior treatment of a systemic NHL. A retrospective case series of 6 patients (mean age 60 years; range 46–65) diagnosed with a diffuse large B cell lymphoma of the CNS following prior successful treatment of a systemic NHL (low-grade in 2; high-grade in 4). Mean interval to diagnosis of PCNSL after diagnosis of systemic NHL was 12 months (range 7–18). In 4/6 patients in whom genetic analysis could be performed, the PCNSL and NHL differed. Treatment utilized high-dose methotrexate and rituximab (immunochemotherapy) followed in patients with a radiographic complete response by autologous peripheral stem cell transplant (ASCT) with total body irradiation (TBI) and multi-agent conditioning chemotherapy (BEAM: carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). 5/6 patients had a radiographic complete response to immunochemotherapy and were treated with ASCT. 4/5 patients were free of disease following ASCT with a mean follow-up of 3 years (range 0.5–4 years). There were no toxic deaths and all patients transplanted successfully engrafted within 28 days (mean 18). Using a treatment paradigm similar to that utilized for recurrent systemic NHL (induction chemotherapy followed by ASCT) for PCNSL occurring metachronously after successful treatment of systemic NHL appears safe and effective.     

替莫唑胺联合利妥昔单抗对复发的老年原发中枢神经淋巴瘤的应用

Objective: The aim of our study was to analyze the long-term results of rituximab combined with temozolomide in treatment of elderly patients (> 60 years) with relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Methods: Twelve postoperative elderly patients (> 60 years) were treated between August 2004 and October 2009. Temozolomide 100 mg/m2 to 200 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 days 1, 5, 8, 22. The maximum number of rituximab cycles was two. After one or two cycles of this ...     

Salvage chemotherapy with temozolomide in primary CNS lymphomas: preliminary results of a phase II trial

Temozolomide is a well-tolerated alkylating agent, that is able to permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and has additive cytotoxicity when given with radiotherapy (RT). A phase II trial assessing temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day, for 5 days every 28 days in primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) patients with negative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS)<4, previously treated with high-dose methotrexate-containing (HD-MTX) chemotherapy and/or RT was started. Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years. Five complete remissions (median duration 6+ months; range 2-36 months), one partial response, four stable disease (median duration 7.2 months, range 2-16.5 months), and 13 progressions were observed. No major toxicities were observed, apart grade 3 vomiting in a single cycle. Main grade 1-2 toxicities were: 15% nausea, 6% vomiting, 9% fatigue and 9% neurological symptoms. This is the first prospective trial assessing single-agent activity in PCNSL at failure. Although some patients had a poor PS and had been heavily pre-treated, temozolomide yielded 26% objective responses and was well tolerated without any major toxicity.     

Phase I study of temozolomide and escalating doses of oral etoposide for adults with recurrent malignant glioma

BACKGROUND: Although temozolomide is active against recurrent malignant glioma, responses in many patients are modest and short-lived. Temozolomide may prove more effective in combination with other agents. Therefore, combination oral chemotherapy for these patients is a particularly attractive approach. METHODS: The authors conducted a Phase I study of temozolomide in combination with escalating doses of oral etoposide (VP-16) to determine the maximum tolerated doses of these two agents when given together. The temozolomide dose was fixed at 150 mg/m(2) per day on Days 1-5. The oral VP-16 was escalated in cohorts of 3 to 6 patients by numbers of days of VP-16 administered: 50 mg/m(2) per day, Days 1-5 (dose level 1), Days 1-8 (dose level 2), Days 1-12 (dose level 3), Days 1-16 (dose level 4), and Days 1-20 (dose level 5). Therapy was given in 28-day cycles. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients enrolled, 26 were fully evaluable and 3 were partially evaluable for toxicity. The 29 patients received a total of 92 cycles. The median age of the patients was 49 years (range, 28-76 years). Diagnoses included glioblastoma (n = 19), gliosarcoma (n = 3), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 5), and anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (n = 2). The median time from diagnosis to disease recurrence was 8 months (3-188 months). Twenty patients were treated at the first disease recurrence, seven at the second, and two at the third. Twenty-four patients (83%) were receiving anticonvulsants and 24 were receiving dexamethasone. All patients had received previous radiation, and 25 of 29 had been treated with chemotherapy previously. Of the 3 patients at dose level 1, none had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Of the 6 patients at dose level 2, 1 patient had DLT: Grade 3 thrombocytopenia resulting in a > 2-week delay in starting the next cycle of chemotherapy. Of the 6 patients at dose level 3, 1 patient had DLT: death due to pneumonia. There were 2 DLTs in the 7 patients at dose level 4: fever, neutropenia, and herpes zoster infection in 1 patient and death due to pneumonia in another. Seven patients had been started at dose level 5 when DLT was established at dose level 4: of the 5 fully evaluable and 2 partially evaluable patients at dose level 5, there was no DLT. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of temozolomide and oral VP-16 in this heavily treated group of patients with recurrent malignant glioma is temozolomide 150 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days and oral VP-16 50 mg/m(2) per day for 12 days.     

Temozolomide and methotrexate for primary central nervous system lymphoma in the elderly

Background Treatment for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) in the elderly is associated with lower response rates and higher risks of acute and late delayed toxicity as compared to younger patients. Temozolomide has emerged as a new alternative treatment for PCNSL and constitutes an attractive option for the elderly because of its favorable toxicity profile. In this study we report outcomes of a consecutive series of PCNSL elderly patients initially treated with an innovative regimen combining methotrexate and temozolomide without radiotherapy or intra-thecal chemotherapy. Methods Histologically confirmed newly-diagnosed PCNSL patients older than 60 years were included. An induction chemotherapy was initially given (methotrexate 3 g /m² on days 1, 10, and 20, and temozolomide 100 mg/m² on days 1–5). Patients achieving a partial or complete response proceeded to a maintenance phase (up to 5 monthly cycles of methotrexate 3 g/m² on day 1, and temozolomide 100 mg/m² days 1–5). Non-responders were treated on an individual basis. Results Among the 23 included patients, a complete response was observed in 55%, and disease progressed in the other 45%. Median event-free survival was 8 months, and median overall survival was 35 months. Grades 3 or 4 toxicities included nephrotoxicity in three patients, and hematotoxicity in five; no neurotoxicity has been observed to date. One patient died while on treatment from complications of intestinal obstruction. Conclusion Our efficacy results are comparable to other reported regimens, with the advantages of a favorable toxicity profile, and absence of intra-thecal chemotherapy. Prospective, controlled studies are warranted to confirm such results.     

Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced, untreated, indolent B-cell nonfollicular lymphomas: phase 2 study of the Italian Lymphoma Foundation

BACKGROUND:

Indolent nonfollicular non‐Hodgkin B‐cell lymphomas (INFLs) are clonal mature B‐cell proliferations for which treatment has not been defined to date.

METHODS:

In this phase 2 study of patients with advanced INFL, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of first‐line rituximab, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide (FCR) as induction immunochemotherapy (rituximab 375 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of each cycle and on days 1 and 14 of cycles 4 and 5; fludarabine 25 mg/m² intravenously on days 2‐4, cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² intravenously on Days 2‐4) every 28 days for 6 cycles followed by a maintenance phase with 4 infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m² intravenously on day 1) every 2 months for responders.

RESULTS:

Forty‐seven patients were enrolled. Among 46 evaluable patients (28 men; median age, 59 years), 19 were diagnosed with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, 21 were diagnosed with small lymphocytic lymphoma, and 6 were diagnosed with nodal marginal zone lymphoma. The overall response rate after maintenance was 89.1% with a 67.4% complete remission (CR) rate (CR/unconfirmed CR) and a 21.7% partial response rate. After a median follow‐up of 40.9 months, the failure‐free survival and progression‐free survival rates both were 90.1%, and the overall survival rate was 97.4%. The main toxicity was hematologic, and related grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 55.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

FCR induction therapy followed by a short maintenance phase is a highly effective regimen with acceptable toxicity. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Phase 2 study of gemcitabine in combination with rituximab in patients with recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND: The management of recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) remains challenging. The objective of this phase 2 trial was to investigate the activity of gemcitabine in combination with rituximab in patients with recurring or refractory HL. METHODS: Patients were considered eligible if they had recurring or refractory HL, had received >or=2 prior chemotherapy regimens, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 相似文献   

Immunochemotherapy with rituximab, vincristine and 5-day cyclophosphamide for heavily pretreated follicular lymphoma

PURPOSE: Therapeutic options for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma include combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy and, for selected patients, autotransplant. Because of the different mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicities, combination of rituximab with chemotherapy is a rational approach. METHODS: 30 patients with follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with advanced-stage disease were treated with four cycles of immunochemotherapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, vincristine 2 mg i.v. on day 2 and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 i.v. from days 2 to 6, repeated at 3-week intervals. All patients had received multiple lines of therapy (median 3); 9 (30%) had relapses (2 after high-dose therapy with autologous transplant), and 21 (70%) were in relapse and refractory to salvage treatment (with an anthracycline-containing regimen in 19). RESULTS: Of 29 patients evaluable for response, 16 (55 %) obtained a complete response (CR) and 3 (10%) a partial response (PR), with an overall response rate of 65% (19/29); 10 patients (35%) achieved less than PR. The median event-free survival was 16.1 months for all patients, being 22.8 months for responders. After a median follow-up of 2 years from the start of therapy (range 6 months to 3.8 years), of 16 patients who achieved CR, 10 remain free of disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of rituximab with vincristine and 5-day cyclophosphamide is able to produce CR in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma, even in patients resistant to third-generation regimens. The regimen designed on the basis of pharmacokinetics of the chimeric antibody seemed important for the clinical efficacy of the combination.     

Primary CNS lymphoma in the elderly: temozolomide therapy and MGMT status

This retrospective series explores temozolomide monotherapy in elderly patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and severe comorbidities. In 17 patients (62–90 years old), the complete response rate was 47%, median progression-free survival was 5 months, and median overall survival was 21 months. Five of 17 patients (29.4%) had prolonged responses for at least 12 months and survived for more than 24 months. Three of these patients had a methylated O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter, while the MGMT status was not assessable in the remaining two patients. Temozolomide monotherapy appears to be effective in a subgroup of elderly PCNSL patients and deserves further evaluation.     

23例原发中枢神经系统生殖细胞瘤综合治疗的疗效分析

背景与目的:原发中枢神经系统生殖细胞瘤(primary central nervoussystem germ cell tumors,CNS GCTs)是较罕见的恶性肿瘤,病理类型多样。除纯生殖细胞瘤和成熟畸胎瘤外,其它类型预后较差。目前的研究多联合包括化疗在内的综合治疗以改善生存。本文分析PEB方案化疗联合放疗/手术的综合治疗的疗效及不良反应。方法:2002年5月至2006年6月期间中山大学肿瘤防治中心收治的23例CNS GCTs患者入组,中位年龄16岁,82.6%的患者AFP和/或β-HCG升高。所有患者均采用PEB方案化疗结合手术/放射治疗。PEB方案:顺铂20mg/m2d1～5或80～100mg/m2d1,足叶乙甙或替尼泊甙60～100mg/m2d1～5,博来霉素10mg/m2,d1,d5,每3周重复。结果:17例初治患者采用诱导化疗后放射治疗或手术/放疗后辅助化疗;6例复发患者行挽救化疗,其中3例肿瘤播散的患者挽救化疗后补充全中枢放疗。23例患者共完成61个周期的PEB方案化疗,中位化疗3周期,单纯化疗的客观有效率为87.0%,完全缓解率为30.4%。全中枢放疗14例,局部放疗8例,1例未放疗。13例接受过手术治疗但均未能完全切除肿瘤。综合治疗后60.9%(14/23)的患者持续完全缓解至今生存未复发。中位随访24个月,死亡6例,均死于肿瘤进展。全组2年生存率为67.4%。主要不良反应为迟发性放射性损伤:继发性再生障碍性贫血并下丘脑综合征1例,放射性脑病1例,垂体功能减退2例。结论:对CNS GCTs特别是伴有肿瘤标记物升高的患者,PEB方案化疗联合放疗/手术的综合治疗可获得较好的疗效和生存率,但全中枢放疗的远期副作用不容忽视。     

Combination therapy with rituximab and intravenous or oral fludarabine in the first‐line,systemic treatment of patients with extranodal marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma of the mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue type

BACKGROUND:

Currently, there are no consensus guidelines regarding the best therapeutic option for patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of the mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type.

METHODS:

Patients with systemically untreated or de novo extranodal MALT lymphoma received rituximab 375 mg/m² intravenously on Day 1 and fludarabine 25 mg/m² intravenously on Days 1 through 5 (Days 1‐3 in patients aged >70 years) every 4 weeks, for 4 to 6 cycles. After the first cycle, oral fludarabine could be given orally at 40 mg/m² on the same schedule. After 3 cycles, a workup was done. Patients who achieved a complete remission (CR) received an additional cycle, and patients who achieved a partial remission (PR) received a total of 6 cycles.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐two patients were studied, including 12 patients with gastric lymphoma and 10 patients with extragastric MALT lymphoma. Six patients (27%) had stage IV disease. In total, 101 cycles were administered (median, 4 cycles per patients). After the third cycle, 13 patients (62%) achieved a CR, and 8 patients (38%) achieved a PR. Primary extragastric disease was an adverse factor to achieve CR after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 23.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.0‐273.3). At the end of treatment, the overall response rate was 100%, and 90% of patients achieved a CR. The progression‐free survival rate at 2 years in patients with gastric and extragastric MALT lymphoma was 100% and 89%, respectively. Toxicities were mild and mainly were hematologic.

CONCLUSIONS:

Combination therapy with rituximab and fludarabine is a very active treatment with favorable safety profile as first‐line systemic treatment for patients with extranodal MALT lymphoma. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Combined modality therapy for primary CNS lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), formerly rare, is being seen with increased frequency among apparently immunocompetent patients. Conventional treatment has consisted of whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) and corticosteroids, with a median survival of 15 to 18 months and a 3% to 4% 5-year survival. Chemotherapy has been useful in the treatment of recurrent PCNSL. In 1985 we began a treatment protocol using chemotherapy and cranial irradiation for the initial therapy of non-AIDS PCNSL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (group A) completed the combined modality regimen. All had placement of an Ommaya reservoir and received pre-RT systemic methotrexate, 1 g/m2, plus six doses of intra-Ommaya methotrexate at 12 mg per dose. A full course of cranial RT (4,000-cGy whole-brain RT plus a 1,440-cGy boost) was followed by two cycles of high-dose cytarabine (ara-C), with each course consisting of two doses of 3 g/m2 ara-C separated by 24 hours and infused over 3 hours. During this period, 16 additional patients (group R) were treated with RT alone, either because patients refused chemotherapy or RT was initiated before our consultation; all would have been eligible to participate in the protocol. Follow-up extended through April 1, 1991. RESULTS: Group A had a significantly prolonged time to recurrence (median, 41 months) compared with group R (median, 10 months; P = .003). Although median survival was doubled from 21.7 months for group R to 42.5 months for group A, this was not statistically significant because of small sample size. More importantly, group R patients received systemic chemotherapy for recurrent PCNSL, which improved survival. CONCLUSION: The addition of chemotherapy to cranial RT for initial treatment of PCNSL significantly improved disease-free survival and contributed to overall survival; all non-AIDS patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL should be considered for combined modality therapy.     

Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND: The combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FC-R) shows significant in vitro synergism and may improve patient outcome with little overlapping toxicity. METHODS: Between December 2000 and June 2005, 77 patients completed therapy after a median of 4 cycles of FC-R (fludarabine at a dose of 25 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on Days 1-3, cyclophosphamide at a dose of 250 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1-3, and rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on Day 1). The median age of the patients was 59 years, 65% were male; 31% had previously untreated disease; and 44% had chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 29% had follicular lymphoma, and 27% other indolent lymphoid malignancies. In addition to standard disease response criteria, patients underwent evaluation using flow cytometric and/or molecular studies. RESULTS: Objective responses (OR) and complete responses (CR) were observed in 83% and 42%, respectively, of evaluable patients (n=76), respectively. For patients with CLL, the respective OR and CR rates were 100% and 67% as firstline therapy, and 95% and 14% as salvage therapy. For patients with follicular lymphoma, the respective OR and CR rates were 100% and 86% as firstline therapy, and 87% and 67% as salvage therapy. Responders who had no detectable disease on flow cytometric and/or molecular studies experienced prolonged remissions with no recurrences reported at a median 25 months of follow-up. Peripheral stem cell collection using stem cell factor plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was successful in 10 of 13 patients who underwent mobilization (77%). CONCLUSIONS: FC-R is highly active as initial or salvage therapy in patients with CLL or indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Collection of autologous stem cells during molecular remission is feasible and may facilitate future exploration of high-dose therapy in these patients.     

Rituximab,methotrexate, procarbazine,vincristine and intensified cytarabine consolidation for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in the elderly: a LOC network study

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is chemosensitive to high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. However, responses in the elderly are short-lasting and outcome is poor. Given that radiotherapy and intensive chemotherapy expose elderly to severe toxicities, alternative consolidation approaches need to be evaluated. In this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL, aged >60, treated with a (R)-MPV-AAA regimen. The regimen consisted of three 28-day cycles of methotrexate (3.5 g/m² D1, D15), procarbazine, vincristine, followed by three 28-day cycles of cytarabine consolidation (3 g/m² D1-2). Addition of rituximab (375 mg/m² D1) was optional. The results were compared with the historical MPV-A regimen. Ninety patients received the (R)-MPV-AAA regimen with (n?=?39) or without (n?=?51) rituximab. Median age was 68 and median KPS 60. 55% of patients achieved a complete response, 8% a partial response and 37% progressed. The median PFS was 10 months, the median OS 28.1 months. Toxicity was mainly hematological, with 54 and 51% of grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombopenia. The response rate was higher in patients receiving rituximab (77 vs. 53%; p?=?0.03), whereas no difference was observed in terms of PFS or OS. When comparing the results to the historical MPV-A, there was no difference in terms of response rate, PFS or OS, but a higher rate of hematotoxicity. This study suggests that extending cytarabine consolidation after methotrexate-based chemotherapy does not improve the MPV-A efficacy but increases toxicity in the elderly. The addition of rituximab may improve the response rate, but its impact on final outcome remains unclear.     

Combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-10.

PURPOSE: Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive primary brain tumor. Cranial irradiation alone rarely results in long-term disease control or prolonged survival. We prospectively studied the use of combination chemotherapy plus cranial irradiation in newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 102 newly diagnosed, immunocompetent patients with PCNSL; 98 were assessable. Patients first received five cycles of methotrexate 2.5 g/m(2), vincristine, procarbazine, and intraventricular methotrexate (12 mg). Whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) was administered to a total dose of 45 Gy and all patients received high-dose cytarabine after RT. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of patients with measurable disease had a complete response to preirradiation chemotherapy and 36% had a partial (> 50%) response, for a 94% response rate. Median progression-free survival was 24.0 months and overall survival was 36.9 months. Age was an important prognostic factor; median survival was 50.4 months in patients younger than 60 and only 21.8 months in those aged 60 or older (P <.001). Fifty-three percent of patients had grade 3 or 4 toxicity during induction chemotherapy, half of which was hematologic. However, 12 patients (15%) experienced severe delayed neurologic toxicity, eight of whom died. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter trial demonstrating improved survival with the combination of chemotherapy plus RT compared with previous reports of RT alone. A high-dose methotrexate-based regimen produced a high response rate before RT was administered. High-dose methotrexate combined with cranial irradiation is an effective therapeutic approach to PCNSL, but neurotoxicity is a delayed risk of this approach.     

An open-label pilot study of pentostatin, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in patients with previously untreated, Stage III or IV, low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, the authors demonstrated that the combination of pentostatin (P) and rituximab (R) was well tolerated and was active in patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In the current study, mitoxantrone (M) was added to P + R to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of this three-drug combination (PMR). METHODS: Twenty-four previously untreated patients with histologically proven, Stage III or IV, low-grade NHL were registered between April and September, 2002. Patients received P (4 mg/m2), M (10 mg/m2), and R (375 mg/m2) every 28 days (M on Day 1; P and R on Days 1 and 8; in Cycle 1, R was given on Day 8 only). Eighty-three percent of patients had Stage IV disease, the median patient age was 62 years (range, 4-81 years), and the performance status was 0-2. RESULTS: Responses included 9 patients who achieved complete remission (CR) (38%), 3 patients with unconfirmed CR (CRu) (12%), 8 patients who achieved partial remission (33%), and 4 patients who achieved stable disease (17%); the overall response rate (CR + CRu + PR) was 83%. PMR appeared to result in comparable activity in all histologies. The median response duration was 10.0 months (range, 3.5-15.1 months). Patients received a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). Eighteen patients (75%) required dose reduction or delay due to toxicity, mainly neutropenia (the administration of growth factors was not permitted). Three patients died (two patients died of disease progression, and one patient died from unrelated cardiopulmonary arrest). Grade > or = 3 drug-related toxicities included neutropenia (67%), leukopenia and febrile neutropenia (17% each), and sepsis (8%), and 38% of neutropenic episodes occurred in Cycles 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, PMR was active and well-tolerated in patients with low-grade NHL, and the combination is deserving of further study.     

Treatment for primary CNS lymphoma: the next step.

PURPOSE: The use of preradiotherapy (RT) methotrexate (MTX) has improved disease control and survival in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). The reported protocol was designed to optimize and enhance the chemotherapeutic component of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients were treated with five cycles of high-dose MTX 3.5 g/m(2), procarbazine 100 mg/m(2)/d, and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2). Thirty patients received whole-brain RT (45 Gy). Twenty-two older patients deferred RT to diminish the risk of delayed neurotoxicity; these patients are compared with 12 older patients who completed the entire treatment regimen. Most patients (n = 35) received high-dose cytarabine after RT. RESULTS: Objective response rate to the induction chemotherapy regimen was 90%; overall median survival is 60 months. Grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression was seen in 30 patients, primarily in association with cytarabine; grade 3 nephrotoxicity due to MTX was seen in two patients. Older patients had similar median survival with or without the addition of RT: 32 versus 33 months, respectively. However, late neurotoxicity was significantly more common in those older patients who received RT (P: =.00004). Patients younger than 60 years who received the complete treatment regimen have not reached median disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Increasing the dose of MTX and adding procarbazine and vincristine improved disease control and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL. Younger patients in particular fared extremely well with this treatment regimen. In older patients, deferring whole-brain RT did not compromise overall survival but did reduce treatment-related toxicity.     

Intensive methotrexate and cytarabine followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: an intent-to-treat analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of intensive methotrexate-based chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem-cell rescue in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients received induction chemotherapy using high-dose systemic methotrexate (3.5 g/m2) and cytarabine (3 g/m2 daily for 2 days). Fourteen patients with chemosensitive disease evident on neuroimaging then received high-dose therapy using carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan with autologous stem-cell rescue. RESULTS: The objective response rate to the induction-phase chemotherapy was 57%, and median overall survival is not yet assessable, with a median follow-up time of 28 months. The overall median event-free survival time is 5.6 months for all patients and 9.3 months for 14 patients who underwent transplantation. Six of these 14 patients (43%) remained disease-free at last follow-up. Treatment was well tolerated; there was one transplantation-related death. Prospective neuropsychologic evaluations have revealed no evidence of treatment-related neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: This treatment approach is feasible in patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL without evidence of significant related neurotoxicity. Although the transplantation results are similar to those achieved in patients with aggressive or poor-prognosis systemic lymphoma, the low response rate to induction chemotherapy and the significant number of patients who experienced relapse soon after HDT suggest that more aggressive induction chemotherapy may be warranted.     

A prospective study on glioblastoma in the elderly

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients (age > 65 years) with glioblastoma multiforme frequently are excluded from clinical studies, and prospective trials for patients with this age group do not exist to date. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective trial in 79 consecutive elderly patients with glioblastoma who underwent surgery and received radiotherapy (59.44 grays in 33 fractions; Group A; n = 24 patients) or received the same radiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with procarbizine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV; lomustine 110 mg/m(2) on Day 1, procarbazine 60 mg/m(2) on Days 8-21, and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) on Days 8 and 29 every 42 days; Group B; n = 32 patients), or received the same radiotherapy plus adjuvant temozolomide (150 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 28 days; Group C; n = 22 patients). RESULTS: The median time to disease progression (TTP) and median survival MST were 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 6.34-8.64) and 12.5 months (95%CI, 11.6-14.8), respectively. The TTP was significantly better for Group C compared with Groups A and B (10.7 months vs. 5.3 months and 6.9 months, respectively; P = 0.0002). Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (P < 0.001) and temozolomide (P < 0.001) were the only independent prognostic factors. Overall survival was better in Group C compared with Group A (14.9 months vs. 11.2 months; P = 0.002), but there were no statistical differences found between Groups A and B or between Groups B and C. Only KPS (P < 0.001) was predictive of overall survival, even if temozolomide chemotherapy was very close to the significance level (P = 0.058). Hematologic Grade 3-4 toxicity was higher with the PCV chemotherapy regimen compared with the temozolomide chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Age alone should not preclude appropriate treatment in elderly patients with good performance status, for whom definitive radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide is advised.