Characteristics of an MM 22 medical microtron 6-MV photon beam

Instrument AB Scanditronix offers a 6-MV therapeutic photon beam as an option with the 22-MeV medical microtron (MM 22). The method of acceleration, target assembly, and use of two flattening filters produce beams having several characteristics (e.g., field flatness, penetration, and intensity) that are superior to many 6-MV Linac beams. Characteristics of the microtron's 6-MV photon beams including quality, surface dose, depth of maximum dose, peak dose rates, peak scatter factors, central axis percentage depth doses, tissue maximum ratios, and beam profiles are described.     

基于EPID采用参数化梯度法测定光子束射野边界

【摘 要】 目的:探究参数化梯度方法（PGM）测量电子射野影像系统（EPID）光子束射野大小的可行性。 方法:PGM通过一个修改的双曲正切函数拟合Profile半影区。瓦里安EDGE机载aS1200采集6 MV和10 MV FF及FFF射束EPID数据,TrueBeam机载aS1000采集6 MV FF射束EPID数据。γ分析1 mm/1%标准量化PGM拟合Profile半影区与EPID测量半影区一致性。比较半高宽方法与PGM测量的FF射束射野大小,比较最大斜率方法与PGM测量的FFF射束射野大小;比较PGM在不同射束能量、不同EPID探测器类型和引入铅门位置误差后测量射野边界的稳定性和扩展性。 结果:半影区PGM拟合与EPID实测数据Pearson相关系数大于0.999,γ值小于0.2。FF射束,半高宽方法测定射野均大于PGM,且随着射野增大而增大,Profile本影去除后,两种方法测量差值显著减小;FFF射束,最大斜率方法与PGM测定射野大小差值在0.1 mm以内。PGM能够稳定测量不同能量、不同模态、不同EPID探测器类型射野边界,能够准确识别铅门1 mm位置变动。 结论:PGM可作为一种鲁棒通用的方法适用于EPID光子束射野质量保障。     

Mixing intensity modulated electron and photon beams: combining a steep dose fall-off at depth with sharp and depth-independent penumbras and flat beam profiles.

For application in radiotherapy, intensity modulated high-energy electron and photon beams were mixed to create dose distributions that feature: (a) a steep dose fall-off at larger depths, similar to pure electron beams, (b) flat beam profiles and sharp and depth-independent beam penumbras, as in photon beams, and (c) a selectable skin dose that is lower than for pure electron beams. To determine the required electron and photon beam fluence profiles, an inverse treatment planning algorithm was used. Mixed beams were realized at a MM50 racetrack microtron (Scanditronix Medical AB, Sweden), and evaluated by the dose distributions measured in a water phantom. The multileaf collimator of the MM50 was used in a static mode to shape overlapping electron beam segments, and the dynamic multileaf collimation mode was used to realize the intensity modulated photon beam profiles. Examples of mixed beams were generated at electron energies of up to 40 MeV. The intensity modulated electron beam component consists of two overlapping concentric fields with optimized field sizes, yielding broad, fairly depth-independent overall beam penumbras. The matched intensity modulated photon beam component has high fluence peaks at the field edges to sharpen this penumbra. The combination of the electron and the photon beams yields dose distributions with the characteristics (a)-(c) mentioned above.     

Methods for beam data acquisition offered by a mini-phantom

Mini-phantoms are an important tool for measurement of basic head scatter parameters in high-energy photon beams, and recently they have also been used for beam quality specification. Therefore the feasibility and reliability of basic beam parameter acquisition using only a mini-phantom is checked in 6, 18 and 25 MV photon beams. These parameters include head scatter correction factors, phantom scatter correction factors, total scatter correction factors, wedge factors, off-axis ratios, as well as beam attenuation coefficients and beam hardening coefficients. In order to specify beam quality variations and beam quality modifications by a wedge, two different methods are compared: the first method uses a constant source to chamber distance of 1 m, the second method refers to narrow beam geometry. Mu values derived with two different beam quality specification methods show a systematic deviation. However, relative variations of the attenuation coefficient within the beam and the associated beam quality modifications observed with the two methods show good agreement in open and wedged beams. Phantom scatter correction factors are calculated from measured head scatter correction factors and total scatter correction factors as well as from attenuation coefficients. Measured and calculated phantom scatter correction factors agree within 1% with the values given in literature. For 18 and 25 MV photon beam, wedge factors measured in water or in the mini-phantom agree within 0.5%, but maximum deviations of approximately 1.5% are observed at 6 MV for the largest field sizes. It is demonstrated that the determination of several beam data related to full scatter conditions does not necessarily require the availability of a full scatter phantom. The mini-phantom is a reliable but very cheap and simple tool. It offers versatile possibilities to measure, check and verify basic beam parameters in high-energy photon beams.     

Optimization of combined electron and photon beams for breast cancer

Recently, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and modulated electron radiotherapy have gathered a growing interest for the treatment of breast and head and neck tumours. In this work, we carried out a study to combine electron and photon beams to achieve differential dose distributions for multiple target volumes simultaneously. A Monte Carlo based treatment planning system was investigated, which consists of a set of software tools to perform accurate dose calculation, treatment optimization, leaf sequencing and plan analysis. We compared breast treatment plans generated using this home-grown optimization and dose calculation software for different treatment techniques. Five different planning techniques have been developed for this study based on a standard photon beam whole breast treatment and an electron beam tumour bed cone down. Technique 1 includes two 6 MV tangential wedged photon beams followed by an anterior boost electron field. Technique 2 includes two 6 MV tangential intensity-modulated photon beams and the same boost electron field. Technique 3 optimizes two intensity-modulated photon beams based on a boost electron field. Technique 4 optimizes two intensity-modulated photon beams and the weight of the boost electron field. Technique 5 combines two intensity-modulated photon beams with an intensity-modulated electron field. Our results show that technique 2 can reduce hot spots both in the breast and the tumour bed compared to technique 1 (dose inhomogeneity is reduced from 34% to 28% for the target). Techniques 3, 4 and 5 can deliver a more homogeneous dose distribution to the target (with dose inhomogeneities for the target of 22%, 20% and 9%, respectively). In many cases techniques 3, 4 and 5 can reduce the dose to the lung and heart. It is concluded that combined photon and electron beam therapy may be advantageous for treating breast cancer compared to conventional treatment techniques using tangential wedged photon beams followed by a boost electron field.     

Backscatter towards the monitor ion chamber in high-energy photon and electron beams: charge integration versus Monte Carlo simulation

In some linear accelerators, the charge collected by the monitor ion chamber is partly caused by backscattered particles from accelerator components downstream from the chamber. This influences the output of the accelerator and also has to be taken into account when output factors are derived from Monte Carlo simulations. In this work, the contribution of backscattered particles to the monitor ion chamber response of a Varian 2100C linac was determined for photon beams (6, 10 MV) and for electron beams (6, 12, 20 MeV). The experimental procedure consisted of charge integration from the target in a photon beam or from the monitor ion chamber in electron beams. The Monte Carlo code EGS4/BEAM was used to study the contribution of backscattered particles to the dose deposited in the monitor ion chamber. Both measurements and simulations showed a linear increase in backscatter fraction with decreasing field size for photon and electron beams. For 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams, a 2-3% increase in backscatter was obtained for a 0.5 x 0.5 cm2 field compared to a 40 x 40 cm2 field. The results for the 6 MV beam were slightly higher than for the 10 MV beam. For electron beams (6, 12, 20 MeV), an increase of similar magnitude was obtained from measurements and simulations for 6 MeV electrons. For higher energy electron beams a smaller increase in backscatter fraction was found. The problem is of less importance for electron beams since large variations of field size for a single electron energy usually do not occur.     

Surface dosimetry for oblique tangential photon beams: a Monte Carlo simulation study

The effect of beam obliquity on the surface relative dose profiles for the tangential photon beams was studied. The 6 and 15 MV photon beams with 4 x 4 and 10 x 10 cm2 field sizes produced by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator were used. Phase-space models of the photon beams were created using Monte Carlo simulations based on the EGSnrc code, and were verified using film measurements. The relative dose profiles in the phantom skin, at 2 mm depth from the surface of the half-phantom geometry, or HPG, were calculated for increasing gantry angles from 270 to 280 deg clockwise. Relative dose profiles of a full phantom enclosing the whole tangential beam (full phantom geometry, or FPG) were also calculated using Monte Carlo simulation as a control for comparison. The results showed that, although the relative dose profiles in the phantom skin did not change significantly with an oblique beam using a FPG, the surface relative depth dose was increased for the HPG. In the HPG, with 6 MV photon beams and field size = 10 x 10 cm2, when the beam angle, starting from 270 deg, was increased from 1 to 3 deg, the relative depth doses in the phantom skin were increased from 68% to 79% at 10 cm depth. This increase in dose was slightly larger than the dose from 15 MV photon beams with the same field size and beam angles, where the relative depth doses in phantom skin were increased from 81% to 87% at 10 cm depth. A parameter called the percent depth dose (PDD) ratio, defined as the relative depth dose from the HPG to the relative depth dose from the FPG at a given depth along the phantom skin, was used to evaluate the effect of the phantom-air interface. It is found that the PDD ratio increased significantly when the beam angle was changed from zero to 1-3 degrees. Moreover, the PDD ratio, for a given field size, experienced a greater increase for 6 MV than for 15 MV. For the same photon beam energy, the PDD ratio increased more with a 4 x 4 cm2 field compared to 10 x 10 cm2. The results in this study will be useful for physicists and dosimetrists to predict the surface relative dose variations when using clinical tangential-like photon beams in radiation therapy.     

Small-beam calibration by 0.6- and 0.2-cm3 ionization chambers

Small beams are often applied in radiotherapy, e.g., in shrinking field and high-dose techniques with curative intent. For a given beam, measured field size factors (FSF) may vary with responses of different detectors to nonuniform radiation fluence. Dose rates of small photon and electron beams with diverse profiles were measured in polystyrene with 0.6- and 0.2-cm3 Farmer ionization chambers. FSF of 60Co, 4-, 8-, and 16-MV photon beams, and of 6-, 12-, and 20-MeV electron beams, were determined as ratios of dose rates of beams with differing field dimensions to dose rates of 10 X 10 cm beams. 60Co and 4-MV photon beam FSF were also determined in air using acrylic buildup caps. FSF obtained via 0.6- and 0.2-cm3 chambers are compared as functions of beam flatness and quality.. It is shown that notable discrepancies can exist between FSF for the same field obtained with different detectors, even when chamber volumes are well within nominal beam dimensions. Possible dose delivery errors arising from use of the 0.6-cm3 chamber were found to be from 0% to 2% for 4 X 4 to 5 X 5 cm photon beams, and from - 1% to 5% for electron beams 4 cm in diameter. Possible errors greater than 5% were noted for most beams less than 3.5 X 3.5 cm. Consequently, it is recommended that detectors smaller than the Farmer 0.6-cm3 chamber be employed in determining FSF of beams less than or equal to 5 X 5 cm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

An apparatus for applying strong longitudinal magnetic fields to clinical photon and electron beams

Monte Carlo studies have recently renewed interest in the use of the effect of strong transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields to manipulate the dose characteristics of clinical photon and electron beams. A 3.5 T superconducting solenoidal magnet was used to evaluate the effect of a longitudinal field on both photon and electron beams. This note describes the apparatus and demonstrates some of the effects on the beam trajectory and dose distributions for measurements in a homogeneous phantom. The effects were studied using film in air and in phantoms which fit in the magnet bore. The magnetic field focused and collimated the electron beams. The converging, non-uniform field confined the beam and caused it to converge with increasing depth in the phantom. Due to the field's collecting and focusing effect, the beam flux density increased, leading to increased dose deposition near the magnetic axis, especially near the surface of the phantom. This study illustrates some benefits and challenges associated with the use of non-uniform longitudinal magnetic fields in conjunction with clinical electron and photon beams.     

Energy spectra, angular spread, fluence profiles and dose distributions of 6 and 18 MV photon beams: results of monte carlo simulations for a varian 2100EX accelerator

The purpose of this study is to provide detailed characteristics of incident photon beams for different field sizes and beam energies. This information is critical to the future development of accurate treatment planning systems. It also enhances our knowledge of radiotherapy photon beams. The EGS4 Monte Carlo code, BEAM, has been used to simulate 6 and 18 MV photon beams from a Varian Clinac-2100EX accelerator. A simulated realistic beam is stored in a phase space data file, which contains details of each particle's complete history including where it has been and where it has interacted. The phase space files are analysed to obtain energy spectra, angular distribution, fluence profile and mean energy profiles at the phantom surface for particles separated according to their charge and history. The accuracy of a simulated beam is validated by the excellent agreement between the Monte Carlo calculated and measured dose distributions. Measured depth-dose curves are obtained from depth-ionization curves by accounting for newly introduced chamber fluence corrections and the stopping-power ratios for realistic beams. The study presents calculated depth-dose components from different particles as well as calculated surface dose and contribution from different particles to surface dose across the field. It is shown that the increase of surface dose with the increase of the field size is mainly due to the increase of incident contaminant charged particles. At 6 MV, the incident charged particles contribute 7% to 21% of maximum dose at the surface when the field size increases from 10 x 10 to 40 x 40 cm2. At 18 MV, their contributions are up to 11% and 29% of maximum dose at the surface for 10 x 10 cm2 and 40 x 40 cm2 fields respectively. However, the fluence of these incident charged particles is less than 1% of incident photon fluence in all cases.     

Dose buildup for obliquely incident photon beams

For obliquely incident photon beams, the buildup of dose with depth is markedly different from normally incident beams. However, relatively little data on this topic exists for high-energy photon beams of energy greater than 6 MV. Measurements of dose in the buildup region were made using a plane-parallel ionization chamber in a polystyrene phantom with obliquely incident 6-, 10-, 18-, and 24-MV x-ray beams angled 0 degrees to 84 degrees. Buildup curves at these angles were plotted and from these an obliquity factor, defined as the ratio of ionization charge collected at a point for a particular angle of incidence to that collected at the same point at normal incidence, was determined. For each energy, the obliquity factor as a function of depth, field size, and source-chamber distance was studied. Results indicate that the obliquity factor is highly dependent on the beam energy, angle of incidence, the collimator opening, and the source-skin distance. A mathematical expression has been developed to predict the dose in the buildup region of high-energy photon beams for various angles of beam incidence, field size, and chamber distance.     

Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) of carbon-doped aluminum oxide (Al2O3:C) for film dosimetry in radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Conventional x-ray films and radiochromic films have inherent challenges for high precision radiotherapy dosimetry. Here we have investigated basic characteristics of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) of irradiated films containing carbon-doped aluminum oxide (Al2O3:C) for dosimetry in therapeutic photon and electron beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The OSL films consist of a polystyrene sheet, with a top layer of a mixture of single crystals of Al2O3:C, ground into a powder, and a polyester base. The total thickness of the films is 0.3 mm. Measurements have been performed in a water equivalent phantom, using 4, 6, 10, and 18 MV photon beams, and 6-22 MeV electron beams. The studies include assessment of the film response (acquired OSL signal/delivered dose) on delivered dose (linearity), dose rate (1-6 Gy/min), beam quality, field size and depth (6 MV, ranges 4 x 4-30 x 30 cm2, dmax-35 cm). Doses have been derived from ionization chamber measurements. OSL films have also been compared with conventional x-ray and GafChromic films for dosimetry outside the high dose area, with a high proportion of low dose scattered photons. In total, 787 OSL films have been irradiated. RESULTS: Overall, the OSL response for electron beams was 3.6% lower than for photon beams. Differences between the various electron beam energies were not significant. The 6 and 18 MV photon beams differed in response by 4%. No response dependencies on dose rate were observed. For the 6 MV beam, the field size and depth dependencies of the OSL response were within +/-2.5%. The observed inter-film response variation for films irradiated with the same dose varied from 1% to 3.2% (1 SD), depending on the measurement day. At a depth of 20 cm, 5 cm outside the 20 x 20 cm2 6 and 18 MV beams, an over response of 17% was observed. In contrast to GafChromic and conventional x-ray films, the response of the Al2O3:C films is linear in the clinically relevant dose range 0-200 cGy. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the OSL signal of irradiated films containing Al2O3:C is a promising technique for film dosimetry in radiotherapy with no or small response variations with dose rate, beam quality, field size and depth, and a linear response from 0 to 200 cGy.     

Evaluation of Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters for passive dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams in radiotherapy

This article investigates the performance of Al2O3: C optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) for application in radiotherapy. Central-axis depth dose curves and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) responses were obtained in a water phantom for 6 and 18 MV photons, and for 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV electron beams from a Varian 21EX linear accelerator. Single OSL measurements could be repeated with a precision of 0.7% (one standard deviation) and the differences between absorbed doses measured with OSLDs and an ionization chamber were within +/- 1% for photon beams. Similar results were obtained for electron beams in the low-gradient region after correction for a 1.9% photon-to-electron bias. The distance-to-agreement values were of the order of 0.5-1.0 mm for electrons in high dose gradient regions. Additional investigations also demonstrated that the OSL response dependence on dose rate, field size, and irradiation temperature is less than 1% in the conditions of the present study. Regarding the beam energy/quality dependence, the relative response of the OSLD for 18 MV was (0.51 +/- 0.48)% of the response for the 6 MV photon beam. The OSLD response for the electron beams relative to the 6 MV photon beam. The OSLD response for the electron beams relative to the 6 MV photon beam was in average 1.9% higher, but this result requires further confirmation. The relative response did not seem to vary with electron energy at dmax within the experimental uncertainties (0.5% in average) and, therefore, a fixed correction factor of 1.9% eliminated the energy dependence in our experimental conditions.     

A Monte Carlo study of a flattening filter-free linear accelerator verified with measurements

A Monte Carlo model of an Elekta Precise linear accelerator has been built and verified by measured data for a 6 and 10 MV photon beam running with and without a flattening filter in the beam line. In this study the flattening filter was replaced with a 6 mm thick copper plate, provided by the linac vendor, in order to stabilize the beam. Several studies have shown that removal of the filter improves some properties of the photon beam, which could be beneficial for radiotherapy treatments. The investigated characteristics of this new beam included output, spectra, mean energy, half value layer and the origin of scattered photons. The results showed an increased dose output per initial electron at the central axis of 1.76 and 2.66 for the 6 and 10 MV beams, respectively. The number of scattered photons from the accelerator head was reduced by (31.7 ± 0.03)% (1 SD) for the 6 MV beam and (47.6 ± 0.02)% for the 10 MV beam. The photon energy spectrum of the unflattened beam was softer compared to a conventional beam and did not vary significantly with the off-axis distance, even for the largest field size (0-20 cm off-axis).     

Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods

The purpose of this investigation is to study the feasibility of using an alternative method to commission stereotactic radiosurgery beams shaped by micro multi-leaf collimators by using Monte Carlo simulations to obtain beam characteristics of small photon beams, such as incident beam particle fluence and energy distributions, scatter ratios, depth-dose curves and dose profiles where measurements are impossible or difficult. Ionization chambers and diode detectors with different sensitive volumes were used in the measurements in a water phantom and the Monte Carlo codes BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc were used in the simulation. The Monte Carlo calculated data were benchmarked against measured data for photon beams with energies of 6 MV and 10 MV produced from a Varian Trilogy accelerator. The measured scatter ratios and cross-beam dose profiles for very small fields are shown to be not only dependent on the size of the sensitive volume of the detector used but also on the type of detectors. It is known that the response of some detectors changes at small field sizes. Excellent agreement was seen between scatter ratios measured with a small ion chamber and those calculated from Monte Carlo simulations. The values of scatter ratios, for field sizes from 6 x 6 mm2 to 98 x 98 mm2, range from 0.67 to 1.0 and from 0.59 to 1.0 for 6 and 10 MV, respectively. The Monte Carlo calculations predicted that the incident beam particle fluence is strongly affected by the X-Y-jaw openings, especially for small fields due to the finite size of the radiation source. Our measurement confirmed this prediction. This study demonstrates that Monte Carlo calculations not only provide accurate dose distributions for small fields where measurements are difficult but also provide additional beam characteristics that cannot be obtained from experimental methods. Detailed beam characteristics such as incident photon fluence distribution, energy spectra, including composition of primary and scattered photons, can be independently used in dose calculation models and to improve the accuracy of measurements with detectors with an energy-dependent response. Furthermore, when there are discrepancies between results measured with different detectors, the Monte Carlo calculated values can indicate the most correct result. The data set presented in this study can be used as a reference in commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams shaped by a BrainLAB m3 on a Varian 2100EX or 600C accelerator.     

Peak scatter factors for high energy photon beams.

The peak scatter factor (PSF) for a photon beam is defined as the ratio of the total dose and the primary dose at the depth of dose maximum. The values of the PSF for photon beams ranging from 60Co to 24 MV are calculated using the EGS4 Monte Carlo technique, to avoid measurement difficulties. The calculation shows that the effect of SSD on PSF for high energy photon beams is not significant for small fields, but can be as high as 1% for large fields. For the 60Co beam, the calculation agrees with the data tabulated on BJR Supplement 25 to within 0.8%. The BJR value (1.054) of 10 x 10 cm2 for 60Co is 0.6% lower than the present value due to the underestimation of scatters from the source capsule and collimators. For a given field size, PSF is varied by up to 2% when beam quality changes from 60Co to 24 MV. For normalized PSF, the values of BJR Supplement 25 (which are assumed to be the same for beams ranging from 60Co to 50 MV) agree well with the present calculation for small field sizes, but are higher than our data by up to 2% for large field sizes. The presently calculated PSFs are related to field size(s) by an empirical expression, PSF = 1 + ms/(s + n), where m and n are the fitting parameters. This equation describes the PSFs within 0.4% (0.15% on average).     

Characteristics of the high-energy photon beam of a 25-MeV accelerator

The CGR Saturne 25 is an isocentrically mounted standing wave medical linear accelerator that produces dual-energy photon beams and a scanned electron beam with six selectable energies between 4 and 25 MeV. The highest energy photon beam is nominally referred to as 23 MV. For this beam the mean energy of the accelerated electron beam on the 1.3 radiation length (4 mm) tungsten x-ray target is found to be approximately 21 MeV, with the energy acceptance stated to be +/- 5%. The electron beam traverses a 270 degrees bending magnet upstream of the x-ray production target. The resulting bremsstrahlung beam passes through a combination steel and lead flattening filter, 4-cm maximum thickness. Dosimetric data for the 23-MV beam are presented with respect to rectangular field output factor, depth of maximum dose as a function of field size, surface and buildup dose, central axis percent depth dose, tissue-phantom ratios, beam profile, applicability of inverse square, and block transmission. Some data are also presented on the effect of different flattening filter designs on apparent beam energy.     

Monte Carlo simulations of dose near a nonradioactive gold seed

The relative doses and hot/cold spot positions around a non-radioactive gold seed, irradiated by a 6 or 18 MV photon beam in water, were calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. Phase space files of 6 and 18 MV photon beams with a field size of 1 x 1 cm2 were generated by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator using the EGSnrc and BEAMnrc code. The seed (1.2 x 1.2 x 3.2 mm3) was positioned at the isocenter in a water phantom (20 x 20 x 20 cm2) with source-to-axis distance = 100 cm. For the single beam geometry, the relative doses (normalized to the dose at 5 mm distance above the isocenter) at the upstream seed surface were calculated to be 1.64 and 1.56 for the 6 and 18 MV beams respectively when the central beam axis (CAX) is parallel to the width of the seed. These doses were slightly higher than those (1.58 and 1.52 for 6 and 18 MV beams respectively) calculated when the CAX is perpendicular to the width of the seed. Compared to the relative dose profiles with the same beam geometry without the seed in the water phantom, the presence of the seed affects the dose distribution at about 3 mm distance beyond both the upstream and downstream seed surface. For a pair of opposing beams with equal and unequal beam weight, the hot and cold spots of both opposing beams were mixed. For a 360 degree photon arc around the longitudinal axis of the seed, the relative dose profile along the width of the seed was similar to that of the opposing beam pair, except the former geometry has a larger dose gradient near the seed surface. In this study, selected results from our simulation were compared to previous measurements using film dosimetry.     

Beam characteristics of a new model of 6-MV linear accelerator.

This paper describes the beam characteristics and dosimetry measurements performed on the 6-MV photon beam of a new model of linear accelerator, three of which were recently introduced and installed in our institution. Percent depth dose and tissue maximum ratio tables for a variety of field sizes and depths, as well as other parameters used for treatment planning are presented. These accelerators are the first of their kind using both hardware and software tools to control interlocks. Checking procedures for these interlocks are available from the authors upon request. Comparison of characteristic parameters between these three new 6-MV linear accelerators and with the 6-MV beams of two other accelerators is also made.     

Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA TRS-398) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM TG-51) have published new protocols for the calibration of radiotherapy beams. These protocols are based on the use of an ionization chamber calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in a standards laboratory's reference quality beam. This paper compares the recommendations of the two protocols in two ways: (i) by analysing in detail the differences in the basic data included in the two protocols for photon and electron beam dosimetry and (ii) by performing measurements in clinical photon and electron beams and determining the absorbed dose to water following the recommendations of the two protocols. Measurements were made with two Farmer-type ionization chambers and three plane-parallel ionization chamber types in 6, 18 and 25 MV photon beams and 6, 8, 10, 12, 15 and 18 MeV electron beams. The Farmer-type chambers used were NE 2571 and PTW 30001, and the plane-parallel chambers were a Scanditronix-Wellh?fer NACP and Roos, and a PTW Markus chamber. For photon beams, the measured ratios TG-51/TRS-398 of absorbed dose to water Dw ranged between 0.997 and 1.001, with a mean value of 0.999. The ratios for the beam quality correction factors kQ were found to agree to within about +/-0.2% despite significant differences in the method of beam quality specification for photon beams and in the basic data entering into kQ. For electron beams, dose measurements were made using direct N(D,w) calibrations of cylindrical and plane-parallel chambers in a 60Co gamma-ray beam, as well as cross-calibrations of plane-parallel chambers in a high-energy electron beam. For the direct N(D,w) calibrations the ratios TG-51/TRS-398 of absorbed dose to water Dw were found to lie between 0.994 and 1.018 depending upon the chamber and electron beam energy used, with mean values of 0.996, 1.006, and 1.017, respectively, for the cylindrical, well-guarded and not well-guarded plane-parallel chambers. The Dw ratios measured for the cross-calibration procedures varied between 0.993 and 0.997. The largest discrepancies for electron beams between the two protocols arise from the use of different data for the perturbation correction factors p(wall) and p(dis) of cylindrical and plane-parallel chambers, all in 60Co. A detailed analysis of the reasons for the discrepancies is made which includes comparing the formalisms, correction factors and the quantities in the two protocols.