Delaying forelimb responses by microstimulation of macaque V1

Electrical microstimulation of macaque V1 has previously been shown to delay saccadic eye movements made to a punctate visual target placed in the receptive field of the stimulated neurons. It remains unclear whether this delay effect is specific to the oculomotor system or whether the effect can be demonstrated in the skeletomotor system as well. To address this question, a rhesus monkey was trained to depress a left or right lever with its respective hand in response to a visual target presented in the left or right hemifield. On 50% of trials, a 100 ms train of stimulation consisting of 100 μA, 0.2-ms anode-first pulses was delivered to the neurons before the onset of the visual target. Stimulation of V1 delayed the execution of the lever response when the visual target was positioned within the receptive field of the stimulated neurons. We suggest that the delay effect induced by microstimulation of V1 is largely due to a disruption of the visual signal as it is transmitted along the geniculostriate pathway.     

Microstimulation of V1 affects the detection of visual targets: manipulation of target contrast

Electrical microstimulation of the striate cortex (area V1) in monkeys delays the execution of saccadic eye movements generated to a visual target located in the receptive field of the stimulated neurons. We have argued that this effect is because of disruption of the visual signal transmitted along the geniculostriate pathway. The delivery of electrical stimulation to V1 evokes a punctate light or dark phosphene in human subjects. If electrical stimulation of V1 in monkeys evokes a light or dark phosphene, then one might expect that the delay effect might vary according to whether monkeys are required to detect a light or a dark visual target. For instance, if the stimulation is activating V1 elements coding for a light visual stimulus but not a dark visual stimulus then stimulation may delay saccades generated to a light target but not to a dark target. We tested this idea by having monkeys generate saccadic eye movements to light or dark visual targets immediately after the stimulation was delivered to V1. We found that the delay effect induced by stimulation varied with target contrast, but remained invariant to whether a bright or dark visual target was presented in the receptive field of the stimulated neurons. The significance of these results is discussed with regard to using monkeys to develop a visual prosthesis for the blind.     

Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole

Transient visual field defects (VFDs) and phosphenes were induced in normal volunteers by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a circular magnetic coil of 12.5 cm diameter placed with its lower rim 2–4 cm above the inion in the midline. Subjects had to detect small, bright dots presented randomly for 14 ms in one of 60 locations on a computer screen resulting in a plot of the central 9° of the visual field. In 8 of 17 subjects, transient VFDs were inducible at peak magnetic field strenghts of 1.1–1.4 T. In the central 1–3°, detection of targets was impaired in both the upper and lower visual field, whereas at 4–9° large parts of only the lower visual field were affected with a sharp cut-off along the horizontal meridian. Targets at 1° in the lower field were affected with lower TMS intensities than corresponding locations in the upper or peripheral locations in the lower field. Detection of central targets was affected at more caudal stimulation sites than detection of peripheral targets. Phosphenes were elicitable in 14 of 17 subjects at clearly lower field strengths of 0.6–1.0 T. Many subjects perceived chromatophosphenes. From a discussion of the literature on patients with VFDs and the known topography of the human visual system, it is concluded that the transient VFDs at 1–3° are probably due to stimulation of both striate cortex (V1) and extrastriate areas (V2/V3), while VFDs in the lower visual field at eccentricities 4–9° are due to stimulation of V2/V3 but not V1. Received: 14 January 1997 / Accepted: 2 June 1997     

What delay fields tell us about striate cortex

It is well known that electrical activation of striate cortex (area V1) can disrupt visual behavior. Based on this knowledge, we discovered that electrical microstimulation of V1 in macaque monkeys delays saccadic eye movements when made to visual targets located in the receptive field of the stimulated neurons. This review discusses the following issues. First, the parameters that affect the delay of saccades by microstimulation of V1 are reviewed. Second, the excitability properties of the V1 elements mediating the delay are discussed. Third, the properties that determine the size and shape of the region of visual space affected by stimulation of V1 are described. This region is called a delay field. Fourth, whether the delay effect is mainly due to a disruption of the visual signal transmitted through V1 or whether it is a disturbance of the motor signal transmitted between V1 and the brain stem saccade generator is investigated. Fifth, the properties of delay fields are used to estimate the number of elements activated directly by electrical microstimulation of macaque V1. Sixth, these properties are used to make inferences about the characteristics of visual percepts induced by such stimulation. Seventh, the disruptive effects of V1 stimulation in monkeys and humans are compared. Eighth, a cortical mechanism to account for the disruptive effects of V1 stimulation is proposed. Finally, these effects are related to normal vision.     

Discharge of pursuit-related neurons in the caudal part of the frontal eye fields in juvenile monkeys with up–down pursuit asymmetry

The smooth-pursuit system uses retinal image-slip-velocity information of target motion to match eye velocity to actual target velocity. The caudal part of the frontal eye fields (FEF) contains neurons whose activity is related to direction and velocity of smooth-pursuit eye movements (pursuit neurons), and these neurons are thought to issue a pursuit command. During normal pursuit in well-trained adult monkeys, a pursuit command is usually not differentiable from the actual eye velocity. We examined whether FEF pursuit neurons signaled the actual eye velocity during pursuit in juvenile monkeys that exhibited intrinsic differences between upward and downward pursuit capabilities. Two, head-stabilized Japanese monkeys of 4 years of age were tested for sinusoidal vertical pursuit of target motion at 0.2–1.2 Hz (±10°, peak target velocity 12.5–75.0°/s). Gains of downward pursuit were 0.8–0.9 at 0.2–1.0 Hz, and peak downward eye velocity increased up to ~60°/s linearly with target velocity, whereas peak upward eye velocity saturated at 15–20°/s. The majority of downward FEF pursuit neurons increased the amplitude of their discharge modulation almost linearly up to 1.2 Hz. The majority of upward FEF pursuit neurons also increased amplitude of modulation nearly linearly as target frequency increased, and the regression slope was similar to that of downward pursuit neurons despite the fact that upward peak eye velocity saturated at ~0.5 Hz. These results indicate that the responses of the majority of upward FEF pursuit neurons did not signal the actual eye velocity during pursuit. We suggest that their activity reflected primarily the required eye velocity.     

The assessment of position of stationary targets perceived during saccadic eye movement

Summary The experiment was performed to establish the accuracy with which visual targets perceived during saccadic eye movement are localised. Subjects were presented with the task of executing saccades of 30° plus amplitude, passing through primary gaze, about the time of peak velocity a 5 ms red flash was presented at some random position (up to 30° left or right of centre) on a horizontal visual display. Subjects were required to indicate the direction in which they thought the flash was localised by fixating in that direction. Observations were made under conditions of prolonged total darkness and in the presence of a contrasting background. Measurement was made of saccade velocity and eye displacement as an index of target positions. Eye displacement was linearly scaled with respect to true target direction. Targets were localised with an average error of 5°–6° although the variance was high. No systematic differences were found between conditions or subjects. Error was unrelated to saccade velocity. It is concluded that during saccadic eye movements the appreciation of target position is maintained with an acceptable degree of accuracy.     

Neurons in the lateral intraparietal area create a priority map by the combination of disparate signals

Primates search for objects in the visual field with eye movements. We recorded the activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) in animals performing a visual search task in which they were free to move their eyes, and reported the results of the search with a hand movement. We distinguished three independent signals: (1) a visual signal describing the abrupt onset of a visual stimulus in the receptive field; (2) a saccadic signal predicting the monkey’s saccadic reaction time independently of the nature of the stimulus; (3) a cognitive signal distinguishing between the search target and a distractor independently of the direction of the impending saccade. The cognitive signal became significant on average 27 ms after the saccadic signal but before the saccade was made. The three signals summed in a manner discernable at the level of the single neuron. A.E. Ipata and A.L. Gee have contributed equally to this work.     

Comparison of cortico-cortical and cortico-collicular signals for the generation of saccadic eye movements

Many neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) and lateral intraparietal (LIP) areas of cerebral cortex are active during the visual-motor events preceding the initiation of saccadic eye movements: they respond to visual targets, increase their activity before saccades, and maintain their activity during intervening delay periods. Previous experiments have shown that the output neurons from both LIP and FEF convey the full range of these activities to the superior colliculus (SC) in the brain stem. These areas of cerebral cortex also have strong interconnections, but what signals they convey remains unknown. To determine what these cortico-cortical signals are, we identified the LIP neurons that project to FEF by antidromic activation, and we studied their activity during a delayed-saccade task. We then compared these cortico-cortical signals to those sent subcortically by also identifying the LIP neurons that project to the intermediate layers of the SC. Of 329 FEF projection neurons and 120 SC projection neurons, none were co-activated by both FEF and SC stimulation. FEF projection neurons were encountered more superficially in LIP than SC projection neurons, which is consistent with the anatomical projection of many cortical layer III neurons to other cortical areas and of layer V neurons to subcortical structures. The estimated conduction velocities of FEF projection neurons (16.7 m/s) were significantly slower that those of SC projection neurons (21.7 m/s), indicating that FEF projection neurons have smaller axons. We identified three main differences in the discharge properties of FEF and SC projection neurons: only 44% of the FEF projection neurons changed their activity during the delayed-saccade task compared with 69% of the SC projection neurons; only 17% of the task-related FEF projection neurons showed saccadic activity, whereas 42% of the SC projection neurons showed such increases; 78% of the FEF projection neurons had a visual response but no saccadic activity, whereas only 55% of the SC projection neurons had similar activity. The FEF and SC projection neurons had three similarities: both had visual, delay, and saccadic activity, both had stronger delay and saccadic activity with visually guided than with memory-guided saccades, and both had broadly tuned responses for disparity stimuli, suggesting that their visual receptive fields have a three-dimensional configuration. These observations indicate that the activity carried between parietal and frontal cortical areas conveys a spectrum of signals but that the preponderance of activity conveyed might be more closely related to earlier visual processing than to the later saccadic stages that are directed to the SC.     

Early- and late-responding cells to saccadic eye movements in the cortical area V6A of macaque monkey

The cortical area V6A, located in the dorsal part of the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus, contains retino- and craniocentric visual neurones together with neurones sensitive to gaze direction and/or saccadic eye movements, somatosensory stimulation and arm movements. The aim of this work was to study the dynamic characteristics of V6A saccade-related activity. Extracellular recordings were carried out in six macaque monkeys performing a visually guided saccade task with the head restrained. The task was performed in the dark, in both the dark and light, and sometimes in the light only. The discharge of certain neurones during saccades is due to their responsiveness to visual stimuli. We used a statistical method to distinguish responses due to visual stimulation from those responsible for saccadic control. Out of 597 V6A neurones tested, 66 (11%) showed responses correlated with saccades; 26 of 66 responded also to visual stimulation and 31 of 66 did not; the remaining 9 were not visually tested. We calculated the response latency to saccade onset and its inter-trial variance in 24 of 66 neurones. Saccade neurones could respond before, during or after the saccade. Neurones responding before saccade-onset or during saccades had much higher latency variance than neurones responding after saccades. The early-responding cells had a mean latency (±SD) of –64±62 ms, while the late-responding cells a mean latency of +89±20 ms. The responses to saccadic eye movements were directionally sensitive and varied with the amplitude of the saccade. Responses of late-responding cells disappeared in complete darkness. We suggest that the activity of early-responding cells represents the intended saccadic eye movement or the shift of attention towards another part of the visual space, whereas that of late-responding cells is a visual response due to retinal stimulation during saccades. Electronic Publication     

The dorsomedial frontal cortex of the macaca monkey: fixation and saccade-related activity

Summary The activity of 249 neurons in the dorsomedial frontal cortex was studied in two macaque monkeys. The animals were trained to release a bar when a visual stimulus changed color in order to receive reward. An acoustic cue signaled the start of a series of trials to the animal, which was then free to begin each trial at will. The monkeys tended to fixate the visual stimuli and to make saccades when the stimuli moved. The monkeys were neither rewarded for making proper eye movements nor punished for making extraneous ones. We found neurons whose discharge was related to various movements including those of the eye, neck, and arm. In this report, we describe the properties of neurons that showed activity related to visual fixation and saccadic eye movement. Fixation neurons discharged during active fixation with the eye in a given position in the orbit, but did not discharge when the eye occupied the same orbital positions during nonactive fixation. These neurons showed neither a classic nor a complex visual receptive field, nor a foveal receptive visual field. Electrical stimulation at the site of the fixation neurons often drove the eye to the orbital position associated with maximal activity of the cell. Several different kinds of neurons were found to discharge before saccades: 1) checking-saccade neurons, which discharged when the monkeys made self-generated saccades to extinguish LED's; 2) novelty-detection saccade neurons, which discharged before the first saccade made to a new visual target but whose activity waned with successive presentations of the same target. These results suggest that the dorsomedial frontal cortex is involved in attentive fixation. We hypothesize that the fixation neurons may be involved in codifying the saccade toward a target. We propose that their involvement in arm-eye-head motor-planning rests primarily in targeting the goal of the movement. The fact that saccaderelated neurons discharge when the saccades are self initiated, implies that this area of the cortex may share the control of voluntary saccades with the frontal eye fields and that the activation is involved in intentional motor processes.     

Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention

Many studies have established that the strength of visual perception and the strength of visual representations within visual cortex vary according to the focus of covert spatial attention. While it is clear that attention can modulate visual signals, the source of this modulation remains unknown. We have examined the possibility that saccade related mechanisms provide a source of spatial attention by studying the effects of electrical microstimulation of the frontal eye fields (FEF) on spatial attention. Monkeys performed a task in which they had to detect luminance changes of a peripheral target while ignoring a flashing distracter. The target luminance change could be preceded by stimulation of the FEF at current levels below that which evoked saccadic eye movements. We found that when the target change was preceded by stimulation of FEF, the monkey could detect smaller changes in target luminance. The increased sensitivity to the target change only occurred when the target was placed in the part of the visual field represented by neurons at the stimulation site. The magnitude of improvement depended on the temporal asynchrony of the stimulation onset and the target event. No significant effect of stimulation was observed when long intervals (>300 ms) between stimulation and the target event were used, and the magnitude of the increased sensitivity decreased systematically with increasing asynchrony. At the shortest asynchrony, FEF stimulation temporally overlapped the target event and the magnitude of the improvement was comparable to that of removing the distracter from the task. These results demonstrate that transient, but potent improvements in the deployment of covert spatial attention can be obtained by microstimulation of FEF sites from which saccadic eye movements are also evoked.     

Response fields of intraparietal neurons quantified with multiple saccadic targets

The activity of each of 99 intraparietal neurons was studied in three awake-behaving rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) while subjects performed 100–900 delayed saccade trials. On each trial, a saccadic target was presented at one location selected randomly from a grid of 441 locations spanning 40° of horizontal and vertical visual space. Individual neurons in our population were sensitive to both the direction and amplitude of saccades. Response fields, which plotted firing rate as a function of the horizontal and vertical amplitude of movements for each neuron, were characterized by a Cartesian two-dimensional gaussian model. The goodness-of-fit of these gaussian models was tested by: (1) comparing observed responses with predicted responses for each movement; and (2) by computing the percentage of variance explained by each model. Cartesian Gaussian models provided a good fit to the response fields of most neurons. Across our population, the Gaussian fit to the response field of each neuron accounted for more of the variance in neuronal activity when the data were plotted with regard to the horizontal and vertical amplitude of the saccade than when the same data were plotted with regard to the position of the saccadic target. The Gaussian functions were used to estimate the eccentricity and spatial tuning breadth of each neuronal response field. Modal response field radius was less than 5°, whereas mean response field radius was about 10°. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that response field eccentricity accounted for less than 30% of the variance in response field radius. Analysis of the horizontal distribution of response field centers showed an approximately normal distribution around central fixation. Most histologically recovered neurons were located on the lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus, although a small number of saccade-related neurons were recorded from Brodmann’s area 5 on the medial bank of the intraparietal sulcus. Received: 10 July 1997 / Accepted: 8 January 1998     

Visual and visual-vestibular responses of frog cerebellar neurons

Summary Micropipette recordings were obtained from single neurons of the frog cerebellum to monocular and binocular visual stimuli. 64% of the visually activated cerebellar neurons could be identified as Purkinje cells. Two major groups of cerebellar visual neurons could be distinguished: The neurons of the first group have restricted receptive fields within the visual field of one or both eyes and respond to diffuse illumination or to small contrast stimuli moving through the receptive field. The neurons of the second group have no restricted receptive fields and respond best to a moving patterned surround, stimulating one or both eyes. Among these neurons four classes could be distinguished by binocular surround stimulation: Neurons activated by horizontal movement to the right (C1 neurons), neurons activated by movement to the left (C2 neurons), neurons activated by movement in both directions (C3 neurons) and neurons which are inhibited by movement in both directions (C4 neurons). The contribution of each eye to the binocular response revealed that the signals from both retinae interact either in a Homodirectional or a Heterodirectional manner. Stimulation of the receptors in the horizontal semicircular canal (horizontal turning movement) leads to a change in the activity of cerebellar visual neurons. Depending on the directionality of the neurons, an enhancement or a reduction in the neuronal activity can be achieved by combining visual and vestibular stimulation. Electrical optic nerve stimulation revealed two latency ranges for the activation elicited by the mossy fiber as well as by the climbing fiber system.     

Retrograde transneuronal transport of wheat-germ agglutinin to the retina from visual cortex in the cat

Summary The stability of visual perception despite eye movements suggests the existence, in the visual system, of neural elements able to recognize whether a movement of an image occurring in a particular part of the retina is the consequence of an actual movement that occurred in the visual field, or self-induced by an ocular movement while the object was still in the field of view. Recordings from single neurons in area V3A of awake macaque monkeys were made to check the existence of such a type of neurons (called real-motion cells; see Galletti et al. 1984, 1988) in this prestriate area of the visual cortex. A total of 119 neurons were recorded from area V3A. They were highly sensitive to the orientation of the visual stimuli, being on average more sensitive than V1 and V2 neurons. Almost all of them were sensitive to a large range of velocities of stimulus movement and about one half to the direction of it. In order to assess whether they gave different responses to the movement of a stimulus and to that of its retinal image alone (self-induced by an eye movement while the stimulus was still), a comparison was made between neuronal responses obtained when a moving stimulus swept a stationary receptive field (during steady fixation) and when a moving receptive field swept a stationary stimulus (during tracking eye movement). The receptive field stimulation at retinal level was physically the same in both cases, but only in the first was there actual movement of the visual stimulus. Control trials, where the monkeys performed tracking eye movements without any intentional receptive field stimulation, were also carried out. For a number of neurons, the test was repeated in darkness and against a textured visual background. Eighty-seven neurons were fully studied to assess whether they were real-motion cells. About 48% of them (42/87) showed significant differences between responses to stimulus versus eye movement. The great majority of these cells (36/42) were real-motion cells, in that they showed a weaker response to visual stimulation during tracking than to the actual stimulus movement during steady fixation. On average, the reduction in visual response during eye movement was 64.0 ± 15.7% (SD). Data obtained with a uniform visual background, together with those obtained in darkness and with textured background, indicate that real-motion cells receive an eye-motion input, either retinal or extraretinal in nature, probably acting presynaptically on the cell's visual input. In some cases, both retinal and extraretinal eye-motion inputs converge on the same real-motion cell. No correlation was observed between the real-motion behaviour and the sensitivity to either orientation or direction of movement of the visual stimulus used to activate the receptive field, nor with the retinotopic location of the receptive field. We suggest that the visual system uses real-motion cells in order to distinguish real from self-induced movements of retinal images, hence to recognize the actual movement in the visual field. Based on psychophysical data, the hypothesis has been advanced of an internal representation of the field of view, stable despite eye movement (cf. MacKay 1973). The real-motion cells may be neural elements of this network and we suggest that the visual system uses the output of this network to properly interpret the large number of sensory changes resulting from exploratory eye movements in a stable visual world.     

Primate frontal eye fields. III. Maintenance of a spatially accurate saccade signal

1. We studied the activity of single neurons in the monkey frontal eye fields during oculomotor tasks designed to assess the activity of these neurons when there was a dissonance between the spatial location of a target and its position on the retina. 2. Neurons with presaccadic activity were first studied to determine their receptive or movement fields and to classify them as visual, visuomovement, or movement cells with the use of the criteria described previously (Bruce and Goldberg 1985). The neurons were then studied by the use of double-step tasks that dissociated the retinal coordinates of visual targets from the dimensions of saccadic eye movements necessary to acquire those targets. These tasks required that the monkeys make two successive saccades to follow two sequentially flashed targets. Because the second target disappeared before the first saccade occurred, the dimensions of the second saccade could not be based solely on the retinal coordinates of the target but also depended on the dimensions of the first saccade. We used two versions of the double-step task. In one version neither target appeared in the cell's receptive or movement field, but the second eye movement was the optimum amplitude and direction for the cell (right-EM/wrong-RF task). In the other the second stimulus appeared in the cell's receptive field, but neither eye movement was appropriate for the cell (wrong-EM/right-RF task). 3. Most frontal-eye-field cells discharged in the right-EM/wrong-RF version of the double-step task. Their discharge began after the first saccade and continued until the second saccade was made. They usually discharged even on occasional trials in which the monkey failed to make the second saccade. They discharged much less, or not at all, in the wrong-EM/right-RF version of the double-step paradigm. Thus most presaccadic cells in the frontal eye fields were tuned to the dimensions of saccadic eye movements rather than to the coordinates of retinal stimulation. 4. Eleven movement cells (including 1 which also had independent postsaccadic activity for saccades opposite its presaccadic movement field) were studied, and all had significant activity in the right-EM/wrong-RF task. 5. Almost all (28/32) visuomovement cells, including 12 with independent postsaccadic activity, discharged in the right-EM/wrong-RF task. None of the four that failed had independent postsaccadic activity. 6. The majority (26/40) of visual cells were responsive in the right-EM/wrong-RF task.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Discharge of pursuit neurons in the caudal part of the frontal eye fields during cross-axis vestibular-pursuit training in monkeys

Previous studies in monkeys have shown that pursuit training during orthogonal whole body rotation results in task-dependent, predictive pursuit eye movements. We examined whether pursuit neurons in the frontal eye fields (FEF) are involved in predictive pursuit induced by vestibular-pursuit training. Two monkeys were rotated horizontally at 20°/s for 0.5 s either rightward or leftward with random inter-trial intervals. This chair motion trajectory was synchronized with orthogonal target motion at 20°/s for 0.5 s either upward or downward. Monkeys were rewarded for pursuing the target. Vertical pursuit eye velocities and discharge of 23 vertical pursuit neurons to vertical target motion were compared before training and during the last 5 min of the 25–45 min training. The latencies of discharge modulation of 61% of the neurons (14/23) shortened after vestibular-pursuit training in association with a shortening of pursuit latency. However, their discharge modulation occurred after 100 ms following the onset of pursuit eye velocity. Only four neurons (4/23 = 17%) discharged before the eye movement onset. A significant change was not observed in eye velocity and FEF pursuit neuron discharge during pursuit alone after training without vestibular stimulation. Vestibular stimulation alone without a target after training induced no clear response. These results suggest that the adaptive change in response to pursuit prediction was induced by vestibular inputs in the presence of target pursuit. FEF pursuit neurons are unlikely to be involved in the initial stage of generating predictive eye movements. We suggest that they may participate in the maintenance of predictive pursuit.     

Asymmetry of the internal connections of the striate cortex of the cat in the projection zone of the center of the field of vision

Studies were carried out on the organization of the internal connections of the striate cortex in cats in the projection zone of the center (0–5°) of the field of vision by microintophoretic application of horseradish peroxidase to electrophysiologically identified orientational columns. The area containing neurons showing retrograde labeling in most cases extended in the mediolateral direction. Labeled cells were located in the upper (II, III) and lower (V, VI) layers of the cortex, and the shapes and orientations of the areas containing labeled neurons in these layers coincided. Spatial asymmetry was detected in the distribution of labeled neurons relative to the orientational column studied. Labeled cells were located predominantly medial to the columns, regardless of the distance from the projection of the area centralis. Considering the visuotopical map of field 17, the asymmetry detected here provides evidence that neurons in orientational columns have more extensive connections with neurons of the peripheral part of the cortex. An asymmetrical distribution of “silent” zones around the receptive fields of neurons in orientational columns is suggested, and that these appear to receive influences from the periphery of the visual field. Laboratory of Visual Physiology and Laboratory of Central Nervous System Morphology, I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 6 Makarov Bank, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. Translated from Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 82, No. 12, pp. 23–29, December, 1996.     

Tests of two hypotheses to account for different-sized saccades during disjunctive gaze shifts

Rapid shifts of the point of visual fixation between objects that lie in different directions and at different depths require disjunctive eye movements. We tested whether the saccadic component of such movements is equal for both eyes (Hering’s law) or is unequal. We compared the saccadic pulses of abducting and adducting movements when horizontal gaze was shifted from a distant to a near target aligned on the visual axis of one eye (Müller paradigm) in ten normal subjects. We similarly compared horizontal saccades made between two distant targets lying in the same field of movement as during the Müller paradigm tests, and between targets lying symmetrically on either side of the midline, at near side of the midline, at near or far. We measured the ratio of the amplitude of the movements of each eye in corresponding directions due to the saccadic component, as well as corresponding ratios of peak velocity and peak acceleration. In response to a Müller test paradigm requiring about 17° of vergence, the change in position of the unaligned eye was typically twice the size of the corresponding movement of the aligned eye. The ratio of peak velocities for the unaligned/aligned eyes was about 1.5, which was greater than for saccades made between distant targets. The ratio of peak acceleration for unaligned/aligned eyes was about 1.0 during shifts from near to far and about 1.3 for shifts from far to near, these values being similar to corresponding ratios for saccades between distant targets. These measurements of peak acceleration indicate that the saccadic pulses sent to each eye during the Müller paradigm are more equal than would be deduced by comparing the changes in eye position. We retested five subjects to compare directly the peak acceleration of saccades made during the Müller paradigm with similar-sized ”conjugate” saccades made between targets at optical infinity. Saccades made during the Müller paradigm were significant slower (P<0.005) than similar-sized conjugate saccades; this indicated that the different-sized movements during Müller paradigm are not simply due differences in saccadic pulse size but are also influenced by the concurrent vergence movement. A model for saccade-vergence interactions, which incorporates equal saccadic pulses for each eye, and differing contributions from convergence and divergence, accounts for many of these findings. Received: 31 December 1998 / Accepted: 14 July 1999     

Visual responses with and without fixation: neurons in premotor cortex encode spatial locations independently of eye position

 The ventral premotor cortex (PMv) of the macaque monkey contains neurons that respond both to visual and to tactile stimuli. For almost all of these “bimodal” cells, the visual receptive field is anchored to the tactile receptive field on the head or the arms, and remains stationary when the eyes fixate different locations. This study compared the responses of bimodal PMv neurons to a visual stimulus when the monkey was required to fixate a spot of light and when no fixation was required. Even when the monkey was not fixating and the eyes were moving, the visual receptive fields remained in the same location, near the associated tactile receptive field. For many of the neurons, the response to the visual stimulus was significantly larger when the monkey was not performing the fixation task. In control tests, the presence or absence of the fixation spot itself had little or no effect on the response to the visual stimulus. These results show that even when the monkey’s eye position is continuously changing, the neurons in PMv have visual receptive fields that are stable and fixed to the relevant body part. The reduction in response during fixation may reflect a shift of attention from the visual stimulus to the demands of the fixation task. Received: 8 April 1997 / Accepted: 16 July 1997     

Saccadic eye movements to visual and auditory targets

 Recent neurophysiological studies of the saccadic ocular motor system have lent support to the hypothesis that this system uses a motor error signal in retinotopic coordinates to direct saccades to both visual and auditory targets. With visual targets, the coordinates of the sensory and motor error signals will be identical unless the eyes move between the time of target presentation and the time of saccade onset. However, targets from other modalities must undergo different sensory-motor transformations to access the same motor error map. Because auditory targets are initially localized in head-centered coordinates, analyzing the metrics of saccades from different starting positions allows a determination of whether the coordinates of the motor signals are those of the sensory system. We studied six human subjects who made saccades to visual or auditory targets from a central fixation point or from one at 10° to the right or left of the midline of the head. Although the latencies of saccades to visual targets increased as stimulus eccentricity increased, the latencies of saccades to auditory targets decreased as stimulus eccentricity increased. The longest auditory latencies were for the smallest values of motor error (the difference between target position and fixation eye position) or desired saccade size, regardless of the position of the auditory target relative to the head or the amplitude of the executed saccade. Similarly, differences in initial eye position did not affect the accuracy of saccades of the same desired size. When saccadic error was plotted as a function of motor error, the curves obtained at the different fixation positions overlapped completely. Thus, saccadic programs in the central nervous system compensated for eye position regardless of the modality of the saccade target, supporting the hypothesis that the saccadic ocular motor system uses motor error signals to direct saccades to auditory targets. Received: 8 September 1995 / Accepted: 22 November 1996