Novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor mediates inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus

Psychoactive effects of cannabinoids are thought to be mediated, at least in part, by suppression of both glutamate and GABA release via CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Two types of cannabinoid receptor (CB1 and CB2) have been cloned so far. The CB1 receptors are abundantly expressed in the nervous system, whereas CB2 receptors are limited to lymphoid organs (Matsuda et al., 1990; Munro et al., 1993). Immunocytochemical and electrophysiological studies revealed that in the hippocampus CB1 receptors are expressed on axon terminals of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons (Tsou et al., 1999; Katona et al., 1999) and activation of these receptors decreases GABA release (Hájos et al., 2000). Other physiological studies pointed out the involvement of CB1 receptors in the modulation of hippocampal glutamatergic synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation (Stella et al., 1997; Misner and Sullivan, 1999), but anatomical studies could not confirm the existence of CB1 receptors on glutamatergic terminals. Here we examined cannabinoid actions on both glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus of wild type (CB1+/+) and CB1 receptor knockout mice (CB1-/-). The synthetic cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 reduced the amplitudes of excitatory postsynaptic currents in both wild type and CB1-/- mice, while inhibitory postsynaptic currents were decreased only in wild type mice, but not in CB1-/- animals. Our findings are consistent with a CB1 cannabinoid receptor-dependent modulation of GABAergic postsynaptic currents, but a novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor must be responsible for the inhibition of glutamatergic neurotransmission.     

GABA enhances acetylcholine release from hippocampal nerve endings through a mechanism blocked by a GABA uptake inhibitor

The effect of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on the release of [³H]acetylcholine ([³H]ACh) was investigated using superfused rat hippocampal synaptosomes. GABA enhanced the basal efflux of [³H]ACh. The effect of GABA was bicuculline-insensitive. Muscimol, (±)-baclofen or (−)-baclofen did not increase [³H]ACh release. The effect of GABA was counteracted by SK&F 89976 A (N-(4,4-diphenyl-3-butenyl)-nipecotic acid), a GABA uptake inhibitor. One possible interpretation of the results is that a GABA transport system is present on cholinergic terminals, suggesting that GABA and ACh may coexist in some rat hippocampus nerve endings. Another possibility is that the effect of GABA is mediated by a novel subtype of GABA receptor sensitive to SK&F 89976 A.     

The effects of cannabinoids on the brain.

Cannabinoids have a long history of consumption for recreational and medical reasons. The primary active constituent of the hemp plant Cannabis sativa is delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC). In humans, psychoactive cannabinoids produce euphoria, enhancement of sensory perception, tachycardia, antinociception, difficulties in concentration and impairment of memory. The cognitive deficiencies seem to persist after withdrawal. The toxicity of marijuana has been underestimated for a long time, since recent findings revealed delta9-THC-induced cell death with shrinkage of neurons and DNA fragmentation in the hippocampus. The acute effects of cannabinoids as well as the development of tolerance are mediated by G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors. The CB1 receptor and its splice variant CB1A, are found predominantly in the brain with highest densities in the hippocampus, cerebellum and striatum. The CB2 receptor is found predominantly in the spleen and in haemopoietic cells and has only 44% overall nucleotide sequence identity with the CB1 receptor. The existence of this receptor provided the molecular basis for the immunosuppressive actions of marijuana. The CB1 receptor mediates inhibition of adenylate cyclase, inhibition of N- and P/Q-type calcium channels, stimulation of potassium channels, and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. The CB2 receptor mediates inhibition of adenylate cyclase and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. The discovery of endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligands, anandamide (N-arachidonylethanolamine) and 2-arachidonylglycerol made the notion of a central cannabinoid neuromodulatory system plausible. Anandamide is released from neurons upon depolarization through a mechanism that requires calcium-dependent cleavage from a phospholipid precursor in neuronal membranes. The release of anandamide is followed by rapid uptake into the plasma and hydrolysis by fatty-acid amidohydrolase. The psychoactive cannabinoids increase the activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area-mesolimbic pathway. Since these dopaminergic circuits are known to play a pivotal role in mediating the reinforcing (rewarding) effects of the most drugs of abuse, the enhanced dopaminergic drive elicited by the cannabinoids is thought to underlie the reinforcing and abuse properties of marijuana. Thus, cannabinoids share a final common neuronal action with other major drugs of abuse such as morphine, ethanol and nicotine in producing facilitation of the mesolimbic dopamine system.     

Cannabinoid CB(1) receptor expression and affinity in the rat hippocampus following bilateral vestibular deafferentation

Numerous studies have shown that bilateral vestibular deafferentation (BVD) results in spatial memory deficits and hippocampal dysfunction in rats and humans. Since cannabinoid CB(1) receptors are well known to regulate synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, we investigated whether BVD resulted in changes in CB(1) receptor expression and affinity in the rat hippocampus at 1, 3 and 7 days post-surgery, using a combination of Western blotting and radioligand binding. Using Western blotting, we found that CB(1) receptor expression was significantly lower in BVD animals compared to sham controls only in the CA3 area across the 3 time points (P=0.03). CB(1) receptor expression decreased significantly over time for both the BVD and sham animals (P=0.000). The radioligand binding assays showed no significant change in the IC(50) of the CB(1) receptor for the cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist, WIN55,212-2. These results suggest that the CB(1) receptor down-regulates in the CA3 region of the hippocampus following BVD, but with no changes in the affinity of the CB(1) receptor for WIN55,212-2.     

A light and electron microscopic study of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in primate brain.

The immunohistochemical distribution and subcellular localization of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor was determined in the adult monkey using a polyclonal antiserum raised against the amino terminus of the rat CB1 receptor. At the level of light microscopy, our results generally parallel earlier studies investigating CB1 distribution in rodent brain with a few differences. In particular, high levels of receptor were found in the cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum. However significant differences were also noted. The most striking differences were high levels of CB1 receptor in the monkey substantia nigra pars compacta, cerebellar Purkinje cells, and the principal cells of the hippocampus, while few receptors were found in the globus pallidus or substantia nigra pars reticulata. In contrast, in a previous study investigating the rat, using the same antibody, the opposite staining pattern was observed. At the electron microscopic level CB1 receptor was restricted to neurons. Here it was found both pre- and postsynaptically, particularly on dendritic spines and axon terminals. The CB1 receptor is widely distributed in higher brain regions in the monkey. While its distribution is similar to that in the rat, there are major differences, some of which may be significant when extrapolating the behavioral effects of cannabinoids observed in rodents to primates (e.g., humans). The ultrastructural localization of the CB1 receptor suggests that it modulates neuronal excitability by both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms.     

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor mediates glutamatergic synaptic suppression in the hippocampus

Cannabinoids have profound effects on synaptic function and behavior. Of the two cloned cannabinoid receptors, cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is widely distributed in the CNS and accounts for most of the neurological effects of cannabinoids, while cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) expression in the CNS is very limited. The presence of additional receptors [i.e. cannabinoid receptor 3 (CB3)] is suggested by growing evidence of cannabinoid effects that are not mediated by CB1 or CB2. The most direct functional evidence for a CB3 comes from a study in hippocampus where deletion of CB1 was shown to have no effect on cannabinoid-mediated suppression of the excitatory synapse between Schaffer collateral/commissural fibers and CA1 pyramidal cells [Novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor mediates inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 106:1-4]. In contrast, we report here that in extracellular field recordings, the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 (5 microM) had no effect on Schaffer collateral/commissural fiber-CA1 pyramidal cell (Sch-CA1) synaptic transmission in slices from two independently made cannabinoid receptor 1-/- lines [Zimmer et al 1999 and Ledent et al 1999] while strongly suppressing Sch-CA1 synaptic transmission in CB1+/+ mice of the background strains. Also, we observed robust cannabinoid-mediated suppression of the Sch-CA1 synapse in pure C57BL/6 mice, contradicting a recent report that cannabinoid suppression of this synapse is absent in this strain [Hoffman AF, Macgill AM, Smith D, Oz M, Lupica CR (2005) Species and strain differences in the expression of a novel glutamate-modulating cannabinoid receptor in the rodent hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 22:2387-2391]. Our results strongly suggest that cannabinoid-induced suppression of the Sch-CA1 synapse is mediated by CB1. Non-canonical cannabinoid receptors do not seem to play a major role in inhibiting transmitter release at this synapse.     

Retrograde signaling changes the venue of postsynaptic inhibition in rat substantia nigra

Both endocannabinoids through cannabinoid receptor type I (CB1) receptors and dopamine through dopamine receptor type D1 receptors modulate postsynaptic inhibition in substantia nigra by changing GABA release from striatonigral terminals. By recording from visually identified pars compacta and pars reticulata neurons we searched for a possible co-release and interaction of endocannabinoids and dopamine. Depolarization of a neuron in pars reticulata or in pars compacta transiently suppressed evoked synaptic currents which were blocked by GABA(A) receptor antagonists (inhibitory postsynaptic currents [IPSCs]). This depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) was abrogated by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (1 microM). A correlation existed between the degree of DSI and the degree of reduction of evoked IPSCs by the CB1 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (1 microM). The cholinergic receptor agonist carbachol (0.5-5 microM) enhanced DSI, but suppression of spontaneous IPSCs was barely detectable pointing to the existence of GABA release sites without CB1 receptors. In dopamine, but not in GABAergic neurons DSI was enhanced by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (3-10 microM). Both the antagonist for CB1 receptors and the antagonist for dopamine D1 receptors enhanced or reduced, respectively, the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs. This tonic influence persisted if the receptor for the other ligand was blocked. We conclude that endocannabinoids and dopamine can be co-released. Retrograde signaling through endocannabinoids and dopamine changes inhibition independently from each other. Activation of dopamine D1 receptors emphasizes extrinsic inhibition and activation of CB1 receptors promotes intrinsic inhibition.     

γ-Aminobutyrate as an autonomic neurotransmitter: Release and uptake of [H]γ-Aminobutyrate in guinea pig large intestine and cultured enteric neurons using physiological methods and electron microscopic autoradiography

To provide further evidence that some enteric neurons use γ-aminobutyrate (GABA) as a neurotransmitter, we have demonstrated a depolarization-induced release of [³H]GABA from isolated myenteric ganglia in culture, and from segments of large intestine containing the myenteric plexus. In addition, light and electron microscopic autoradiography has been employed to visualize the putative GABAergic neurons and their projections, both in cultured ganglia and in sections from the gut wall.

Explant cultures of the guinea-pig myenteric plexus, containing only neurons and glia intrinsic to the gut, were incubated with 0.14μ M [³H]GABA, washed and then repeatedly depolarized by 62 mM K⁺. The depolarizations always evoked release of [³H]GABA. The evoked release was reversibly blocked by 5mM Co²⁺, suggesting a dependence on Ca²⁺ influx, a characteristic of neuronal transmitter release. Strips of the guinea-pig taenia coli, containing the myenteric plexus, were incubated with 0.14 or 0.7μM [³H]GABA, washed and subjected to electrical field stimulation. This caused release of [³H]GABA, which could be evoked successively on repeated stimulation. The release was of neuronal origin and Ca²⁺ dependent, since it was abolished by 3μ M tetrodotoxin and reversibly blocked by 10 mM Co²⁺. By combined electrophoresis and chromatography the released tritium was identified as being attached to GABA.

Autoradiography, following incubation with low concentrations of [³H]GABA, was used to identify specifically putative GABAergic neurons. Light microscopic autoradiography of cultured ganglia, and electron microscopic autoradiography of sections from the taenia coli including the myenteric plexus, were in good agreement, showing a selective and heavy labelling over a sub-population of neurons, and light labelling over glial cells. The majority of neurons and the non-neural cells were unlabelled. The electron microscopic autoradiographs also showed heavy labelling over some, but not all, axons in the fine axon bundles that innervate the longitudinal muscle of the taenia.

These results strongly support our previous suggestion that a population of myenteric neurons are GABAergic, although more work is needed before this is fully established. Our data also suggest that some of the putative GABAergic neurons project out to the gut musculature, where their axons, together with axons from other neurons, run in bundles to form the intramuscular nerves. We therefore propose that one of the roles of these neurons in the gut is the presynaptic modulation of transmitter released from neighbouring axons in these nerves.     

Redistribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors during evolution of cholinergic basal forebrain territories and their cortical projection areas: a comparison between the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus, primates) and rat

Endocannabinoid signaling, mediated by presynaptic CB1 cannabinoid receptors on neurons, is fundamental for the maintenance of synaptic plasticity by modulating neurotransmitter release from axon terminals. In the rodent basal forebrain, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-like immunoreactivity is only harbored by a subpopulation of cholinergic projection neurons. However, endocannabinoid control of cholinergic output from the substantia innominata, coincident target innervation of cholinergic and CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing afferents, and cholinergic regulation of endocannabinoid synthesis in the hippocampus suggest a significant cholinergic-endocannabinergic interplay. Given the functional importance of the cholinergic modulation of endocannabinoid signaling, here we studied CB1 cannabinoid receptor distribution in cholinergic basal forebrain territories and their cortical projection areas in a prosimian primate, the gray mouse lemur. Perisomatic CB1 cannabinoid receptor immunoreactivity was unequivocally present in non-cholinergic neurons of the olfactory tubercule, and in cholecystokinin-containing interneurons in layers 2/3 of the neocortex. Significantly, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-like immunoreactivity was localized to cholinergic perikarya in the magnocellular basal nucleus. However, cortical cholinergic terminals lacked detectable CB1 cannabinoid receptor levels. A dichotomy of CB1 cannabinoid receptor distribution in frontal (suprasylvian) and parietotemporal (subsylvian) cortices was apparent. In the frontal cortex, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing axons concentrated in layers 2/3 and layer 6, while layer 4 and layer 5 were essentially devoid of CB1 cannabinoid receptor immunoreactivity. In contrast, CB1 cannabinoid receptors decorated axons in all layers of the parietotemporal cortex with peak densities in layer 2 and layer 4. In the hippocampus, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing terminals concentrated around pyramidal cell somata and proximal dendrites in the CA1-CA3 areas, and granule cell dendrites in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. CB1 cannabinoid receptors frequently localized to inhibitory GABAergic terminals while leaving glutamatergic boutons unlabeled. Aging did not affect either the density or layer-specific distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptor-immunoreactive processes. We concluded that organizing principles of CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing neurons and their terminal fields within the basal forebrain are evolutionarily conserved between rodents and prosimian primates. In contrast, the areal expansion and cytoarchitectonic differentiation of neocortical subfields in primates is associated with differential cortical patterning of CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing subcortical and intracortical afferents.     

The cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A facilitates memory acquisition and consolidation in the mouse elevated T-maze

Δ⁹-THC and synthetic cannabinoids produce memory impairment in humans as well as in laboratory animals. The high concentration of cannabinoid CB1 receptors and the presence of endocannabinoids in the hippocampus suggest that a cannabinoid neurochemical system may play a role in learning and memory processes. Thus, the objective of the present work was to study the effect of the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (SR) on memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval in a recently developed elevated T-maze (ETM) model of anxiety and memory. In addition, we investigated whether pre-training SR administration was capable of reversing scopolamine-induced memory impairment. Adult male mice were exposed to the closed arm as many times as necessary for the animals to reach the avoidance criterion of remaining in the closed arm for 300 s; they were then tested (exposed to the closed arm) 24 h and 7 days after the training. SR (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg) was administered i.p. 20 min before the training, immediately after training or 20 min before the test in the mice. The elevated plus-maze (EPM) was used to investigate a possible influence of SR on locomotion and on the anxiety-related behavior. SR provoked memory improvement, which was observed when the drug was administered before (effect on memory acquisition/consolidation) or immediately after the training (effect on memory consolidation), but not when the drug was administered before the test (effect on memory retrieval). Also, SR administration reversed scopolamine-induced amnesia. These effects were observed in the absence of changes in locomotion or anxiety levels. Our results demonstrate that the blockade of cannabinoid receptors may improve memory acquisition and consolidation in the ETM model.     

Mitochondrial CB₁ receptors regulate neuronal energy metabolism

The mammalian brain is one of the organs with the highest energy demands, and mitochondria are key determinants of its functions. Here we show that the type-1 cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)) is present at the membranes of mouse neuronal mitochondria (mtCB(1)), where it directly controls cellular respiration and energy production. Through activation of mtCB(1) receptors, exogenous cannabinoids and in situ endocannabinoids decreased cyclic AMP concentration, protein kinase A activity, complex I enzymatic activity and respiration in neuronal mitochondria. In addition, intracellular CB(1) receptors and mitochondrial mechanisms contributed to endocannabinoid-dependent depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition in the hippocampus. Thus, mtCB(1) receptors directly modulate neuronal energy metabolism, revealing a new mechanism of action of G protein-coupled receptor signaling in the brain.     

Regulation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the central nervous system by chronic cannabinoids

Marijuana produces a number of characteristic behaviors in humans and animals, including memory impairment, antinociception, and locomotor and psychoactive effects. However, tolerance and dependence to cannabinoids develops after chronic use, as demonstrated both clinically and in animal models. The potential therapeutic benefits of certain cannabinoid-mediated effects, as well as the use of marijuana for its psychoactive properties, has raised interest in understanding the cellular adaptations produced by chronic administration of this class of drugs. The primary active constituent of marijuana, delta9-tetrahydrohydrocannabinol (THC), binds to specific G-protein-coupled receptors. The central nervous system (CNS) effects of THC are mediated by CB1 receptors, which couple primarily to inhibitory G-proteins. High levels of CB1 receptors are found in the basal ganglia, hippocampus, cortex, and cerebellum, consistent with the profile of behavioral effects. Studies over the past decade have determined that CB1 receptors undergo downregulation and desensitization following chronic administration of THC or synthetic cannabinoid agonists. In general, these adaptations are regionally widespread and of considerable magnitude, and are thought to contribute to tolerance to cannabinoid-mediated behavioral effects. Adaptation at the effector level has been more difficult to characterize, although it appears that alterations in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and protein kinase A (PKA) activity may be particularly important in cannabinoid dependence. A striking characteristic of CB 1 receptor adaptation is the region dependence of the magnitude and rate of development of downregulation and desensitization. These regional differences may provide interesting insights into the mechanisms of CB1 receptors receptor signaling in different brain regions. Moreover, region-specific adaptations in CB1 receptors following chronic cannabinoid administration may produce differential adaptations at the in vivo level.     

Subcellular localization of type 1 cannabinoid receptors in the rat basal ganglia

Endocannabinoids, acting via type 1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1), are known to be involved in short-term synaptic plasticity via retrograde signaling. Strong depolarization of the postsynaptic neurons is followed by the endocannabinoid-mediated activation of presynaptic CB1 receptors, which suppresses GABA and/or glutamate release. This phenomenon is termed depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) or excitation (DSE), respectively. Although both phenomena have been reported to be present in the basal ganglia, the anatomical substrate for these actions has not been clearly identified. Here we investigate the high-resolution subcellular localization of CB1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens, striatum, globus pallidus and substantia nigra, as well as in the internal capsule, where the striato-nigral and pallido-nigral pathways are located. In all examined nuclei of the basal ganglia, we found that CB1 receptors were located on the membrane of axon terminals and preterminal axons. Electron microscopic examination revealed that the majority of these axon terminals were GABAergic, giving rise to mostly symmetrical synapses. Interestingly, preterminal axons showed far more intense staining for CB1, especially in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, whereas their terminals were only faintly stained. Non-varicose, thin unmyelinated fibers in the internal capsule also showed strong CB1-labeling, and were embedded in bundles of myelinated CB1-negative axons. The majority of CB1 receptors labeled by immunogold particles were located in the axonal plasma membrane (92.3%), apparently capable of signaling cannabinoid actions. CB1 receptors in this location cannot directly modulate transmitter release, because the release sites are several hundred micrometers away. Interestingly, both the CB1 agonist, WIN55,212-2, as well as its antagonist, AM251, were able to block action potential generation, but via a CB1 independent mechanism, since the effects remained intact in CB1 knockout animals. Thus, our electrophysiological data suggest that these receptors are unable to influence action potential propagation, thus they may not be functional at these sites, but are likely being transported to the terminal fields. The present data are consistent with a role of endocannabinoids in the control of GABA, but not glutamate, release in the basal ganglia via presynaptic CB1 receptors, but also call the attention to possible non-CB1-mediated effects of widely used cannabinoid ligands on action potential generation.     

Distribution and postnatal ontogeny of adenosine A2A receptors in rat brain: comparison with dopamine receptors

In adult rat brain, adenosine A_2A receptors and dopamine D₂ receptors are known to be located on the same cells where they interact in an antagonistic manner. In the present study we wanted to examine when this situation develops and compared the postnatal ontogeny of the binding of the adenosine A_2A receptor agonist [³H]CGS 21680, the binding of the dopamine D₁ receptor antagonist [³H]SCH 23390 and the dopamine D₂ receptor antagonist [³H]raclopride.

All three radioligands bound to the striatum at birth and this binding increased several-fold during the postnatal period. [³H]SCH 23390 binding developed first (mostly during the first week), followed by [³H]raclopride binding (first to third week) and [³H]CGS 21680 binding (only during second and third week). For all three radioligands the binding tended to decrease between 21 days and adulthood. This occurred earlier and was more pronounced in the globus pallidus than in the other examined structures. The increase in [³H]CGS 21680 binding from newborn to adult was mainly due to four-fold increase in the number of binding sites. The pharmacology of [³H]CGS 21680 binding to caudate–putamen was similar in newborn, one-week-old and adult animals, and was indicative of A_2A receptors. The binding was inhibited by guanylyl imidodiphosphate at all ages, indicating that A_2A receptors are G-protein-coupled already at birth. In contrast to the large increase in [³H]CGS 21680 binding, there was a decrease in the levels of A_2A messenger RNA during the postnatal period in the caudate–putamen. In cerebral cortex [³H]CGS 21680 bound to a different site than the A_2A receptor. From birth to adulthood cortical binding of [³H]CGS 21680 increased four-fold and that of the adenosine A₁ agonist [³H]cyclohexyladenosine 19-fold. During early postnatal development [³H]SCH 23390 binding was higher in deep than in superficial cortical layers, but this difference disappeared in adult animals. There was binding of both [³H]CGS 21680 and [³H]cyclohexyladenosine to the olfactory bulb, suggesting a role of the two adenosine receptors in processing of olfactory information. [³H]CGS 21680 binding was present in the external plexiform layer and glomerular layer, and increased during development, but the density of binding sites was about one tenth of that seen in caudate–putamen. [³H]cyclohexyladenosine showed a very different labelling pattern, resembling that observed with [³H]SCH 23390.

Postnatal changes in adenosine receptors may explain age-dependent differences in stimulatory caffeine effects and endogenous protection against seizures. Since A_2A receptors show a co-distribution with D₂ receptors throughout development, caffeine may partly exert such actions by regulating the activity of D₂ receptor-containing striatopallidal neurons     

Adenosine A1 receptors in human hippocampus: inhibition of [H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine binding by antagonist drugs

Adenosine A₁ receptors were visualized in human hippocampus using [³H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) as a radioactive ligand probe. The receptor antagonists caffeine, the xanthine derivative KFM 19 and the carbamazepine analogue oxcarbazepine displaced [³H]DPCPX binding homogeneously without any marked difference between the individual layers in the investigated hippocampal subregions (n = 4). K_i's in the individual layers were in a range between 8.5 ± 6.5 μM and 18.9 ± 16.0 μM for caffeine and 11.5 ± 2.8 nM and 18.1 ± 14.1 nM for KFM 19.K_i's could not be calculated for oxcarbazepine as the IC₅₀'s were greater than 100 μM with estimated IC₂₅'s varying between 51.2 ± 53.3 μM and 179.9 ± 89.9 μM. Antagonism of endogenous adenosine at A₁ receptors may thus explain part of the clinical effects of caffeine in humans and possibly exclusively the behavioral effects of KFM 19 in non-human primates.     

Multiple effects of drugs acting on benzodiazepine receptors

The actions on [³H]noradrenaline release of chlordiazepoxide and FG 7142 were investigated in rat hippocampal synaptosomes. The release evoked by GABA, an action mediated by GABA_A receptors, was enhanced by chlordiazepoxide and depressed by FG 7142. K⁺-evoked release, however, was depressed by both chlordiazepoxide and FG 7142 and occurred in the absence of GABA. The actions on both GABA-evoked and K⁺-evoked release were blocked by Ro 15-1788. The results suggest that the distinction between agonist and inverse agonist applies to the GABA-dependent but not to the GABA-independent action of benzodiazepines.     

Altered CB1 receptor and endocannabinoid levels precede motor symptom onset in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's disease

Huntington's disease (HD) is an inherited neurodegenerative disease characterised by cell dysfunction and death in the basal ganglia and cortex. Currently there are no effective pharmacological treatments available. Loss of cannabinoid CB1 receptor ligand binding in key brain regions is detected early in HD in human postmortem tissue [Glass M, Dragunow M, Faull RL (2000) The pattern of neurodegeneration in Huntington's disease: a comparative study of cannabinoid, dopamine, adenosine and GABA(A) receptor alterations in the human basal ganglia in Huntington's disease. Neuroscience 97:505–519]. In HD transgenic mice environmental enrichment upregulates the CB1 receptors and slows disease progression [Glass M, van Dellen A, Blakemore C, Hannan AJ, Faull RL (2004) Delayed onset of Huntington's disease in mice in an enriched environment correlates with delayed loss of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Neuroscience 123:207–212]. These findings, combined with data from lesion studies have led to the suggestion that activation of cannabinoid receptors may be protective. However, studies suggest that CB1 mRNA may be decreased early in the disease progression in HD mice, making this a poor drug target. We have therefore performed a detailed analysis of CB1 receptor ligand binding, protein, gene expression and levels of endocannabinoids just prior to motor symptom onset (12 weeks of age) in R6/1 transgenic mice. We demonstrate that R6/1 mice exhibit a 27% decrease in CB1 mRNA in the striatum compared to wild type (WT). Total protein levels, determined by immunohistochemistry, are not significantly different to WT in the striatum or globus pallidus, but are significantly decreased by 19% in the substantia nigra. CB1 receptor ligand binding demonstrates significant but small decreases (<20%) in all basal ganglia regions evaluated. The levels of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol are significantly increased in the cortex (147%) while anandamide is significantly decreased in the hippocampus to 67% of WT. Decreases are also apparent in the ligand binding of neuronal D1 and D2 dopamine receptors co-located with CB1, while there is no change in GABA_A receptor ligand binding. These results suggest that in this R6/1 mouse colony at 12 weeks there are only very small changes in CB1 protein and receptors and thus this would be an appropriate time point to evaluate therapeutic interventions.     

Distribution of dopaminergic receptors in the primate cerebral cortex: Quantitative autoradiographic analysis using [H]raclopride, [H]spiperone and [H]SCH23390

A widespread distribution of dopamine D₁ receptors in the neocortex is well recognized. However, the presence of dopamine D₂ receptors in this structure has only recently been established [Martres et al. (1985) Eur. J. Pharmac.118, 211–219; Lidow et al. (1989) Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.86, 6412–6416]. In the present paper, a highly specific antagonist, [³H]raclopride, was used for autoradiographic determination of the distribution of D₂ receptors in 12 cytoarchitectonic areas of the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes of the rhesus monkey. A low density of D₂-specific [³H]raclopride binding (1.5–4.0 fmol/mg tissue) was detected in all layers of all cortical areas studied. Throughout the entire cortex, the highest density of binding was consistently found in layer V. This is a unique distribution not observed so far for any other neurotransmitter receptor subtype in monkey cerebral cortex, including D₁ receptor. In addition, a comparison was made of the distribution of [³H]raclopride and [³H]spiperone, which has been commonly used in previous attempts to label cortical D₂ receptors. We found marked differences in the distribution of these two radioligands. In the prefrontal cortex, the pattern of [³H]spiperone binding in the presence of ketanserin resembled the combined distribution of 5-HT_ic serotoninergic and ₂-adrenergic sites as well as D₂ receptors. Thus, [³H]raclopride provides a better estimation of the D₂ receptor distribution than does [³H]spiperone. The distribution of D₂-specific binding of [³H]raclopride was also compared with the D₁-specific binding of [³H]SCH23390 in the presence of mianserin to block labeling to 5-HT₂ and 5-HT_IC sites. The density of D₁-specific [³H]SCH23390 binding was 10–20 times higher than that of D₂-speciflc [³H]raclopride binding throughout the cortex. The densities of both [³H]raclopride and [³H]SCH23390 binding sites display a rostral-caudal gradient with the highest concentrations in prefrontal and the lowest concentrations in the occipital cortex. However, the binding sites of these two ligands had different laminar distributions in all areas examined. In contrast to preferential [³H]raclopride binding in layer V, a bilaminar pattern of [³H]SCH23390 labeling was observed in most cytoarchitectonic areas, with the highest concentrations in supragranular layers I, II and IIIa and infragranular layers V and VI. Whereas [³H]raclopride binding was similar in all cytoarchitectonic areas, [³H]SCH23390 exhibited some region-specific variations in the primary visual and motor cortex.

The different regional and laminar distributions of D₁ and D₂ dopaminergic receptors indicates that they may subserve different aspects of dopamine function in the cerebral cortex.     

The proximal and distal C-terminal tail domains of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor mediate G protein coupling.

The human CB1 cannabinoid receptor couples to G(i/o) proteins and inhibits neuronal voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. The role of the C-terminal tail of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in G(i/o) protein coupling was examined using the superior cervical ganglion neuronal expression system. Deletion of the distal intracellular C-terminal tail (amino acids 418-472) slowed the kinetics and reduced the magnitude of Ca2+ channel inhibition. Deletion of the entire intracellular C-terminal tail (amino acids 401-472) abolished Ca2+ channel inhibition demonstrating the critical role of the proximal amino acids 401-417 of the C-terminal tail in G protein signaling. Expression of the C-terminal truncated receptors on the cell surface was examined using an N-terminal CB1 antibody. Both the C-terminal truncated receptors were expressed on the cell surface and were no different from wild type CB1 cannabinoid receptors.This study establishes that the proximal CB1 cannabinoid receptor intracellular C-terminal tail domain (amino acids 401-417) is critical for G(i/o) protein coupling and that the distal C-terminal tail domain (amino acids 418-472) profoundly modulates both the magnitude and kinetics of signal transduction. Thus, the C-terminal tail of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor has a wider role in G protein coupling than was previously thought.