Association of the predominant symptom with clinical characteristics and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is considered a heterogeneous disorder with different pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to the symptom pattern. The Rome II committee proposed that subdividing patients with FD into groups with predominant pain versus discomfort might identify subgroups with homogeneous pathophysiological and clinical properties. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship of predominant pain or discomfort with pathophysiological mechanisms and to evaluate whether considering individual predominant symptoms yields better results. METHODS: Consecutive FD patients (n = 720; 489 women; mean age, 41.3 +/- 0.6 years) filled out a dyspepsia questionnaire and identified a single most bothersome symptom. We analyzed the association of this predominant symptom with demographic, clinical, and pathophysiological features (Helicobacter pylori status, gastric emptying in 592 patients, and gastric sensitivity and accommodation testing in 332 patients). RESULTS: According to Rome II criteria, 22% were pain predominant and 78% discomfort predominant. Patients with predominant pain had a higher prevalence of hypersensitivity (44% vs 25%) and delayed gastric emptying was observed less frequently in these patients (16% vs 26%), but there was major overlap. Detailed analysis showed that any of 8 dyspeptic symptoms could be predominant. Predominant early satiety or vomiting was associated with significantly higher prevalences of weight loss (89% and 75%, respectively) and of acute onset (61% and 60%, respectively). Impaired accommodation was found in 79% of patients with predominant early satiety. The highest prevalence of delayed emptying was found in predominant fullness (38%) and of hypersensitivity in predominant pain (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Subdividing FD patient groups according to the predominant symptom does not reliably identify subgroups with a homogeneous underlying pathophysiological mechanism.     

Gastric accommodation and emptying in evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopy-negative dyspepsia is a common symptom that often is difficult to define in pathophysiologic terms. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of disordered gastric accommodation and emptying in patients referred with unexplained upper gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: A computerized diagnostic index was used to identify all patients, 18-70 years old, who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess gastric accommodation at Mayo Clinic Rochester over a 3-year period. Demographics, clinical features, and results of diagnostic testing, including scintigraphic gastric emptying, were extracted from the electronic record. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were identified; the primary clinical diagnoses were functional dyspepsia, postfundoplication syndromes, rumination syndrome, and diabetic dyspepsia. Gastric accommodation was impaired in 43% of the whole group: 47% of functional dyspepsia, 44% of postfundoplication syndromes, and 33% of diabetic dyspepsia. Delayed gastric emptying was most prevalent in diabetic dyspepsia, and was accelerated in postfundoplication syndromes groups. Thirty-seven percent of patients had abnormal gastric emptying. The highest prevalence of delayed gastric emptying was in the diabetic dyspepsia and accelerated gastric emptying in postfundoplication syndromes groups. Twenty-five percent of patients with normal gastric emptying had impaired accommodation. Upper-gastrointestinal symptoms were not different in groups based on gastric accommodation or emptying results. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired gastric accommodation is common in patients with unexplained dyspepsia. Symptoms alone cannot predict physiologic disturbances. These noninvasive tests identify single or combined pathophysiologic disturbances and may help to identify subgroups of patients as candidates for more selective pharmacotherapy in the future.     

Dyspepsia and its overlap with irritable bowel syndrome

Patients with functional dyspepsia and the irritable bowel syndrome are commonly seen in both primary care and gastroenterology subspecialty settings. Although functional dyspepsia and the irritable bowel syndrome can occur separately, recent research suggests that they often appear together as an overlap syndrome and thus may represent different portions of a unifying spectrum of disease. Despite their widespread prevalence, the pathogenesis of these disorders is not well established but may include impaired gastric emptying, gastric dysrhythmias, hypersensitivity (to acid exposure and to stretch), and Helicobacter pylori infection. Once other disorders in the differential diagnosis have been excluded, treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and the overlap syndrome without alarm signs underscores current prevailing pathophysiologies and is generally empiric and symptom based. It is hoped that management of these disorders will become more targeted and efficacious as our understanding of them improves.     

3 Is functional dyspepsia just a subset of the irritable bowel syndrome?

To determine whether functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome are different entities, epidemiological data, factor analysis studies, physiological data and associated psychological symptoms were reviewed. Between 30% and 60% of patients with either diagnosis also meet the criteria for the other diagnosis, a level greater than expected to occur by chance but not sufficient to infer an identity. Most factor analysis studies identify independent clusters of symptoms corresponding to functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Visceral hypersensitivity is seen throughout the gastrointestinal tract in both disorders, but the motility patterns seen in association with functional dyspepsia (principally antral hypomotility and delayed gastric emptying) differ from the motility patterns seen in irritable bowel syndrome. Psychological symptoms are similar in these two disorders but are not believed to be aetiological for either of them. Thus, based on a factor analysis of gastrointestinal symptoms and differences in intestinal motility, functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome appear to be different entities.     

Relation among personality and symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia and the irritable bowel syndrome

The importance of personality traits in nonulcer dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome is a controversial issue. We wished to assess the distribution of abnormal personality traits in nonulcer dyspepsia and the irritable bowel syndrome, define any relation among personality and symptoms, and determine whether personality factors discriminate among patients with functional, psychiatric, or organic gastrointestinal diseases. Patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (n = 31), irritable bowel syndrome (n = 67), organic gastrointestinal disease (n = 64), somatoform disorder (n = 36) and healthy controls (n = 128) were studied. Before diagnostic evaluation by an independent physician, all patients completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and a symptom questionnaire. Symptom scores for abdominal pain and the Manning criteria, which is considered to be diagnostic for the irritable bowel syndrome, were evaluated. Personality scales in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and organic disease were very similar. However, patients in the other groups differed from somatoform disorder on nearly all scales. In nonulcer dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and organic disease, hypochondriasis weakly correlated with pain. Subgroups of irritable bowel syndrome patients with predominant constipation and those with predominant diarrhea had similar personality traits, although hypomania was minimally increased in constipation. Patients who fulfilled the Manning criteria for irritable bowel syndrome had more psychological distress than those who did not. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory correctly classified somatoform disorder and health 81% and 75% of the time, respectively, but it classified nonulcer dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome correctly in only 32% and 34% of cases. Our results suggest that psychopathology may not be the major explanation for functional gastrointestinal disorders.     

Can symptoms discriminate among those with delayed or normal gastric emptying in dysmotility-like dyspepsia?

OBJECTIVE: Different subgroups can be identified in functional dyspepsia based on symptom type or severity, and may correlate with pathophysiological disturbances. In particular, female sex and severe fullness and vomiting have been reported to be strong independent predictors of slow solid gastric emptying. We aimed to determine if symptom patterns or severity could identify those with abnormal gastric emptying among patients with dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia and, for comparison, type I diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Patients with postprandial symptoms and documented functional dyspepsia by endoscopy (n = 551) and patients with type I diabetes who had postprandial dyspepsia (n = 247) enrolling in two separate randomized controlled trials were evaluated at baseline. Patients were assigned to either the delayed or normal gastric emptying strata, based on a validated C13 octanoic acid breath test with sampling over 4 h. A self-report questionnaire measured the presence and severity of eight symptoms on visual analog scales. The validated Nepean Dyspepsia Index measured the frequency, severity, and bothersomeness of 15 upper GI symptoms on Likert scales. RESULTS: Gastric emptying was definitely delayed (t1/2 > 192 min) in 24% of patients with functional dyspepsia and 28% with diabetes. Delayed gastric emptying was associated with female gender but not age or Helicobacter pylori status. The age- and sex-adjusted risk (odds ratio) of delayed gastric emptying for the upper GI symptoms ranged from 0.99 to 1.0 (all p values > or =0.2). The results were very similar in functional dyspepsia and diabetes. There was also no correlation between t1/2 and number of symptoms or symptom severity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom prevalence and severity were similar in dyspeptic patients with and without delayed gastric emptying. Specific symptoms do not seem to be of predictive value in dysmotility-like dyspepsia for identifying alterations of gastric emptying.     

Ambulatory electrogastrography in patients with sclerodermia, delayed gastric emptying, dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome. Is there any clinical relevance?

Background: Changes in electrogastrographic parameters are described in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, sclerodermia, dyspepsia, and delayed gastric emptying in static measurements. However, no information is available about changes in ambulatory measurements. The objective of this study was to find parameters that discriminate between these diseases using cutaneous 24-h-electrogastrography. Methods: Cutaneous 24-h electrogastrography (EGG) measurements were taken from 20 patients with dyspepsia, 10 patients with systemic sclerosis (sclerodermia, SSc), 7 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), 7 patients with delayed gastric emptying, and 10 healthy volunteers. Measurements were made using a DIGITRAPPER EGG (Synectics Medical Inc., Stockholm, Sweden) and the accompanying computerized data analysis package (ElectroGastroGram Version 6.30, Gastrosoft Inc., Synectics Medical Inc., Stockholm, Sweden). Frequency and power were compared pre- and postprandially, as well as during the entire day of measurement. Results: The 24-h measurements in healthy volunteers revealed 45.00%+/-12.12% normal values (2.4-3.7 cpm), 30.10%+/-7.15% bradygastric values (<2.4 cpm), and 24.20%+/-7.76% tachygastric values (>3.7 cpm). There was no significant change in frequency between rest and motion, but there was a significant increase in power (P<0.05). There was significantly more bradygastria in patients with dyspepsia periprandially as well as after 24 h (P<0.01) than in healthy volunteers. The mean power of patients with dyspepsia was significantly higher than that of patients with IBS (P<0.05). Conclusion: Cutaneous 24-h-EGG may be used as an additional means of differentiating between dyspepsia and IBS.     

Abnormalities of the electrogastrogram in functional gastrointestinal disorders

OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous electrogastrography records gastric electrical activity and detects gastric arrhythmias. Abnormalities of the electrogastrogram have been described in a variety of disorders, but their specificity and their prevalence in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders has not been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the specificity of electrogastrography as well as the prevalence and pattern of abnormalities in functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS: Electrogastrography was performed in 170 patients with functional dyspepsia, 70 patients with irritable bowel syndrome, 20 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 30 asymptomatic controls. The abnormal electrogastrogram was defined as <70% normal electrical activity either before or after a test meal. RESULTS: The electrogastrogram was abnormal in 36% of patients with functional dyspepsia and in 25% with irritable bowel syndrome who complained of concurrent dyspepsia. The electrogastrogram was normal in 93% of asymptomatic controls, 90% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux, and 92% of patients with irritable bowel syndrome who did not complain of dyspepsia. As a group, functional dyspepsia patients had a greater degree of tachygastrias both before (p < 0.02) and after (p < 0.01) a test meal. The electrical frequency after the test meal was also more unstable (p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The electrogastrogram is abnormal in approximately 36% of functional dyspepsia patients and has a specificity of approximately 93%. Electrogastrography defines a subgroup of patients with functional dyspepsia and electrical rhythm disturbance. In irritable bowel syndrome, the electrogastrogram is usually abnormal only if concurrent dyspepsia is present.     

Symptom patterns in functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: relationship to disturbances in gastric emptying and response to a nutrient challenge in consulters and non-consulters

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess the relationship between gastric motor and sensory function and symptom patterns in community subjects and patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We recruited 291 asymptomatic blood donors, 151 symptomatic blood donors (recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort), and 40 patients with FD or IBS. Abdominal symptoms were assessed using the bowel disease questionnaire (BDQ) and, in addition, the most bothersome symptom complex identified (dysmotility-type, ulcer-type dyspepsia, or IBS). Gastric emptying time (GET (t(1/2), min)) was measured by (13)C-octanoic breath test and a nutrient challenge performed. Twenty randomly selected asymptomatic blood donors, 48 symptomatic blood donors (30 FD, 18 IBS), and 40 patients (23 FD, 17 IBS) had additional function testing. RESULTS: GET (t(1/2)) was significantly (p<0.05) longer in blood donors with FD symptoms (99 (6) min) and FD patients (110 (12) min) compared with asymptomatic controls (76.7 (7) min), but was not significant in IBS blood donors or patients. Overall, 25 of 48 blood donors with symptoms and 18 of 40 patients had slow gastric emptying. GET was most delayed in subjects with predominantly dysmotility-type symptoms (167 (36) min v controls; p<0.01). Symptom intensities after a nutrient challenge were significantly higher in FD patients and symptomatic blood donors compared with asymptomatic controls; 14 of 48 blood donors with symptoms and 16 of 40 patients had a symptom response to the nutrient challenge exceeding the response (mean (2SD)) of healthy asymptomatic controls. CONCLUSION: Gastric emptying and the global symptom response to a standardised nutrient challenge are abnormal in population based (non-health care seeking) subjects with dyspepsia.     

9 Gastrointestinal sensory abnormalities in functional dyspepsia

Symptoms of functional dyspepsia, such as epigastric pain, bloating or early satiety and nausea, are non-specific and are likely to arise from different mechanisms. Current evidence suggests the presence of at least two subgroups: patients who respond to a prolonged course of acid suppression and patients who show a significant overlap of symptoms with other functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome. An enhanced sensitivity of visceral afferent pathways with or without associated autonomic dysregulation appears to play an important role in the aetiology of symptoms in the second group. In the absence of visceral hypersensitivity, neither the slowing of gastric emptying nor the presence of chronic gastritis appears to be sufficient to cause symptoms of functional dyspepsia. The mechanisms and aetiology of visceral hypersensitivity are incompletely understood. An alteration in the interplay between vagal and spinal afferents, and the inadequate activation of antinociceptive systems in response to tissue irritation, may play a role in symptom generation.     

Symptoms associated with impaired gastric emptying of solids and liquids in functional dyspepsia

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between functional dyspepsia and delayed gastric emptying of solids or liquids is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate in dyspeptic patients the prevalence of delayed gastric emptying for solids or for liquids and to investigate the relationship to the dyspepsia symptom pattern. METHODS: In 392 and 330 patients with functional dyspepsia, the solid and liquid gastric emptying, respectively, was measured using breath tests, and the severity of eight dyspeptic symptoms was scored. RESULTS: Gastric emptying of solids and liquids were delayed in 23% and 35% of the patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of vomiting and postprandial fullness was associated with delayed solid emptying (OR 2.65, 95% CI = 1.62-4.35 and OR 3.08, 95% CI = 1.28-9.16, respectively). Postprandial fullness was also associated with the risk of delayed liquid emptying when symptom was present (OR 3.5, 95% CI = 1.57-8.68), relevant or severe (OR 2.504, 95% CI = 1.41-4.65), and severe (OR 2.214, 95% CI = 1.34-3.67). Severe early satiety was associated with the risk of delayed liquid emptying (OR 1.902, 95% CI = 1.90-3.30). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of dyspeptic patients has delayed gastric emptying of solids or of liquids. Delayed gastric emptying of solids was constantly associated with postprandial fullness and with vomiting. Delayed emptying for liquids was also associated with postprandial fullness and with severe early satiety.     

A database on dyspepsia.

A prospective study of dyspepsia was carried out in a primary referral hospital between 1974-1987 including 1540 patients of whom 1433 were seen as outpatients. The study protocol was agreed in advance and a structured questionnaire was used to elicit relevant clinical information: up to three diagnoses were permitted for each patient. The commonest principal diagnoses were duodenal ulcer (26%), functional dyspepsia (22%), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (15%); alcohol related dyspepsia (4%) was as common as gastric carcinoma or symptomatic gall stones. Multiple diagnoses were common (31% given two diagnoses, and 6% given three) so that in all 2111 diagnoses were given to 1540 patients; the functional disorders (IBS and functional dyspepsia) considered together accounted for 39% of all diagnoses made. Whereas organic conditions were diagnosed by clinicians with confidence (63-98% considered 'certain'), even when given as the principal or first diagnosis IBS was considered 'certain' in only 61% and functional dyspepsia 48%. The demographic symptom data, together with information on tobacco and alcohol use, and work lost are described in detail.     

Dyspeptic symptoms and gastric emptying in the irritable bowel syndrome

OBJECTIVES: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and dyspepsia often overlap. Delayed gastric emptying has been reported in IBS patients, although conflicting results exist. Whether overlapping dyspepsia correlates with gastric emptying abnormalities in IBS patients has not been clarified. This study aimed to evaluate gastric emptying of solids and its relationship with dyspeptic symptoms in IBS patients. METHODS: A total of 146 IBS outpatients seen in a referral center were evaluated for dyspeptic symptoms using a validated questionnaire. Gastric emptying of solids was evaluated scintigraphically in all patients and in 50 healthy controls. RESULTS: Overlapping dyspepsia was diagnosed in 96 (66%) IBS patients. On average, gastric emptying rates were lower in IBS patients (mean +/- SEM, 33% +/- 1%/h) compared with controls (40% +/- 2%/h; p < 0.01). Specifically, gastric emptying was delayed in IBS patients with overlapping dyspepsia (31% +/- 1%/h; p < 0.01), whereas IBS patients without dyspeptic complaints showed gastric emptying rates (37% +/- 2%/h) that were similar to those of healthy controls (40% +/- 2%/h). Relevant postprandial fullness (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.8-12.5) and relevant nausea (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-9.3) were independently associated with delayed gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: IBS patients without overlapping dyspepsia have normal gastric emptying of solids. A significant association exists in IBS patients between delayed gastric emptying and overlapping relevant postprandial fullness and nausea.     

Functional dyspepsia, delayed gastric emptying, and impaired quality of life

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial as to whether delayed gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia is associated with a specific symptom pattern, and it is unknown if gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia is a driver of impaired health related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between functional dyspepsia symptoms, gastric emptying, and HRQOL. METHODS: US patients (n=864; mean age 44 years (range 18-82); 74% female) with functional dyspepsia, as defined by Rome II criteria, were enrolled into one of four clinical trials. All patients had a baseline scintigraphic assessment of gastric emptying of an egg substitute meal, and the trials were stratified on this assessment. Delayed gastric emptying was defined as having at least 6.3% residual volume at four hours. A total of 290 (34%) patients had delayed gastric emptying. HRQOL was assessed by the SF 36 and Nepean dyspepsia index (NDI). RESULTS: Postprandial fullness was independently associated with delayed gastric emptying but the association was weak (odds ratio (OR) 1.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02, 3.86); p=0.04). No independent association was seen with epigastric pain, early satiety, nausea, or bloating. Mean SF 36 physical composite score (PCS) was 42.3 (95% CI 41.6, 43.0) and the mean SF 36 mental composite score (MCS) was 46.8 (95% CI 46.0, 47.5); both mean scores were significantly lower than age and sex adjusted national norms of 50 (p<.0001). Female sex, increasing age, and higher symptom scores for fullness, epigastric pain, and nausea were each independently associated with decreased PCS scores (all p<0.05). Higher baseline nausea symptom score, lower gastric emptying rates at one hour, and lower body mass index were associated with decreased MCS (all p<0.05). Female sex, epigastric pain, and nausea, but not gastric emptying, were associated with an impaired score on the NDI. However, the magnitude of the significant associations were all small. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with functional dyspepsia selected for a clinical trial programme, gastric emptying did not usefully stratify them symptomatically. Quality of life of patients with functional dyspepsia enrolled in this clinical trial programme was significantly impaired but this was not explained by delayed gastric emptying.     

Heterogeneity of symptom pattern,psychosocial factors,and pathophysiological mechanisms in severe functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Categorization of functional dyspepsia into subgroups is based on expert opinion according to (dominant) symptoms or on underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. We used an evidence-based approach to the determination of subtypes of functional dyspepsia. METHODS: Consecutive functional dyspepsia patients were recruited from a tertiary referral center. The following were performed: (1) exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of symptom patterns in a large group of patients with functional dyspepsia; (2) external validation of these factors by the determination of their association pattern with physio- and psychopathological mechanisms, and with health-related quality of life and sickness behavior; and (3) cluster analysis of their distribution in this population. RESULTS: Both EFA and CFA do not support the existence of functional dyspepsia as a homogeneous (unidimensional) condition. A 4-factor model is found to be valid, with differential distribution within the patient population according to cluster analysis. Factor 1 is characterized by nausea, vomiting, early satiety, and weight loss and factor 2 by postprandial fullness and bloating. Both factor 1 and 2 are associated with delayed emptying, but only factor 1 is associated with younger age, female sex, and sickness behavior. Factor 3 is characterized by pain symptoms and associated with gastric hypersensitivity and several psychosocial dimensions including medically unexplained symptoms and health-related quality of life dimensions. Factor 4, characterized by belching, is also associated with hypersensitivity, but is unrelated to psychosocial dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary care population, functional dyspepsia is a heterogeneous condition characterized by 4 major dimensions differentially associated with psychopathological and physiopathological mechanisms.     

Delayed gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia

Opinion statement Functional dyspepsia is a complex syndrome with a poorly defined pathophysiology, resulting in uncertainties in its therapeutic approach. Abnormalities in gastrointestinal motility and sensitivity alone or combined seem to play a role in a substantial subgroup of patients. Drugs capable of prokinetic effects, such as antidopaminergics (eg, metoclopramide, domperidone, levosulpiride) and serotonin 5-HT4 receptor agonists (eg, tegaserod) can be potentially used in the treatment of dyspeptic patients. Furthermore, 5-HT4 receptor agonists do not appear to increase the gastric fundus tone which may also contribute to improved symptoms in subsets of patients. Alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has been investigated mainly in irritable bowel syndrome, and the few studies performed in functional dyspepsia have provided conflicting results. Erythromycin and related derivatives, the motilides, represent another class of prokinetic compounds able to accelerate gastric emptying and potentially indicated in functional dyspepsia. The stimulatory effect on fundic tone and the occurrence of tachyphilaxis hamper the efficacy of these drugs in the long-term treatment. к-opioid receptor agonists might be useful for functional digestive syndromes because of their antinociceptive effects, but there are few available results and most are inconclusive. Results are also needed to prove efficacy of antidepressants (tricyclic agents and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors). Future clinical trials should be performed so that the formal structure required by good clinical practice can be adapted to detect significant effects in subgroups of patients with functional dyspepsia. Therapy should be ideally targeted to the different pathophysiologic abnormalities of these subgroups. The identification of the mechanisms leading to symptom generation should facilitate the development of newer and more effective therapeutic strategies in functional dyspepsia.     

Impact of coexisting irritable bowel syndrome on symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia

Epidemiological studies suggest considerable overlap between functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether coexisting IBS is also associated with symptom pattern or pathophysiology in FD. METHODS: In 309 consecutive FD patients (207 women, age 42 +/- 0.8 yr), questionnaires were used to assess the dyspepsia symptom pattern and the Rome II criteria for IBS. The overall symptom severity was calculated adding the severity score (0-3, 0 = absent, 3 = severe) of eight dyspepsia symptoms. All patients underwent Helicobacter pylori testing, gastric barostat to determine sensitivity to distention and accommodation to a meal, and gastric emptying breath test. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the patients had FD alone, whereas 46% had FD + IBS. FD + IBS patients were more likely to be female (75%vs 60%, p < 0.01) and to have a greater weight loss (5.4 +/- 0.6 vs 3.5 +/- 0.4 kg, p < 0.05). Coexisting IBS did not increase the risk of having any of the dyspeptic symptoms but the overall symptom severity was significantly higher in FD + IBS (12.4 +/- 0.4 vs 9.8 +/- 0.3, p < 0.01). FD + IBS patients had a lower threshold for first perception (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs 3.8 +/- 0.3 mmHg, p < 0.05) and for discomfort (7.9 +/- 0.4 vs 9.5 +/- 0.5 mmHg, p < 0.05) and a greater prevalence of hypersensitivity to gastric distention (44%vs 28%, p < 0.05). Gastric emptying, accommodation to a meal, and prevalence of H. pylori infection did not differ in the two groups. CONCLUSION: About half of the FD patients fulfill the Rome II criteria for IBS. FD + IBS is more prevalent in female patients and is associated with a higher weight loss, with greater overall symptom severity, and with hypersensitivity to distention.     

Lack of association between gastric emptying of solids and symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia

Gastric motor dysfunction and concomitant gastric stasis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of nonulcer dyspepsia, but a cause-and-effect relationship is not established. Essential dyspepsia refers to a subgroup of nonulcer dyspepsia patients who have no evidence of irritable bowel syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux, or pancreaticobiliary disease. In 32 patients with essential dyspepsia, and 32 randomly selected dyspepsia-free community controls of similar age and sex, we measured gastric emptying of solids using Tc99m-Sulphur Colloid in a fried egg sandwich. Subjects with neuromuscular or other diseases that may alter gastric emptying were excluded. Symptoms were assessed by a standard questionnaire. Data processing was carried out "blinded" to the subjects' clinical status. Female patients took significantly longer to empty half the initial stomach activity (mean 90 min) than female controls (mean, 73 min; p = 0.02). The rate of emptying at 25 min was also significantly less in female patients than in controls. Female and male controls, and male patients, had similar emptying times. Delayed emptying was not associated with the occurrence of postprandial pain, belching, or nausea; there was a trend for the half-time rate of emptying to be greater in patients with abdominal distention. While gastric emptying of solids is slightly delayed in females with essential dyspepsia as a group, this may not explain their symptoms.     

Measurement and Evaluation of Gastric Emptying Using Radiopaque Barium Markers

To simplify assessment of gastric emptying, we have developed a radiopaque barium marker method. The subjects were 11 healthy volunteers, 30 patients with progressive systemic sclerosis, 16 patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia, 7 patients with irritable bowel syndrome, and 6 patients with diabetes mellitus. We tested three types of radiopaque markers with manometry by a three-channel strain gauge transducer. The 4.5-mm ring-shaped markers with a specific gravity of 1.2 were emptied from the stomach in correlation with the number of high-amplitude (>50 mm Hg) antral contractions. The percentage of residual markers at 2 hr was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in patients with irritable bowed syndrome than in normal controls, and at 5 hr it was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in patients with systemic sclerosis with esophageal dysmotility, dysmotility-like dyspepsia, or diabetes than in normal controls. This radiopaque barium marker method may be useful as a screening test for determining whether gastric emptying is rapid or delayed.     

Somatization an independent psychosocial risk factor for irritable bowel syndrome but not dyspepsia: a population-based study

BACKGROUND: A psychosocial conceptualization for irritable bowel syndrome and unexplained dyspepsia has been proposed, but remains untested. We conducted a comprehensive population-based study to determine what psychiatric and psychosocial factors, if any, are important in irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia. METHODS: Two hundred and seven participants identified from two previous Australian population surveys who also met Rome I criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (n=156) or unexplained dyspepsia (n=51) were included in the study. Consulters (n=103) were those who had had visited their general practitioner for gastrointestinal symptoms at least once in the prior 12 months. Nonconsulters had not sought medical care for gastrointestinal symptoms in the past year. Controls (n=100) did not report having any abdominal pain in a previous population survey. Psychosocial variables were assessed using structured interviews and validated self-report measures. RESULTS: Psychiatric diagnoses, neuroticism, more highly threatening life event stress, an external locus of control and ineffectual coping styles were significantly associated with having a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome and/or dyspepsia. Only somatization (odds ratio=5.28, 95% confidence interval 1.57-17.68), however, was independently associated with irritable bowel syndrome. Psychosocial factors did not discriminate between consulters and nonconsulters. CONCLUSIONS: Somatization is likely play a key role in explaining irritable bowel syndrome but not dyspepsia.