Comparison of FDG PET and positron coincidence detection imaging using a dual-head gamma camera with 5/8-inch NaI(Tl) crystals in patients with suspected body malignancies

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) images obtained with (a) a dual-head coincidence gamma camera (DHC) equipped with 5/8-inch-thick NaI(Tl) crystals and parallel slit collimators and (b) a dedicated positron emission tomograph (PET) in a series of 28 patients with known or suspected malignancies. Twenty-eight patients with known or suspected malignancies underwent whole-body FDG PET imaging (Siemens, ECAT 933) after injection of approximately 10 mCi of 18F-FDG. FDG DHC images were then acquired for 30 min over the regions of interest using a dual-head gamma camera (VariCam, Elscint). The images were reconstructed in the normal mode, using photopeak/photopeak, photopeak/Compton, and Compton/photopeak coincidence events. FDG PET imaging found 45 lesions ranging in size from 1 cm to 7 cm in 28 patients. FDG DHC imaging detected 35/45 (78%) of these lesions. Among the ten lesions not seen with FDG DHC imaging, eight were less than 1.5 cm in size, and two were located centrally within the abdomen suffering from marked attenuation effects. The lesions were classified into three categories: thorax (n=24), liver (n=12), and extrahepatic abdominal (n=9). FDG DHC imaging identified 100% of lesions above 1.5 cm in the thorax group and 78% of those below 1.5 cm, for an overall total of 83%. FDG DHC imaging identified 100% of lesions above 1.5 cm, in the liver and 43% of lesions below 1.5 cm, for an overall total of 67%. FDG DHC imaging identified 78% of lesions above 1.5 cm in the extrahepatic abdominal group. There were no lesions below 1.5 cm in this group. FDG coincidence imaging using a dual-head gamma camera detected 90% of lesions greater than 1.5 cm. These data suggest that DHC imaging can be used clinically in well-defined diagnostic situations to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.     

Usefulness of dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick nal crystals for nuclear oncology: Comparison with dedicated PET camera and conventional gamma camera with thin NaI crystals

AIM: A comparative study of the images obtained with a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystals (19 mm), a dedicated PET camera with BGO crystals and a conventional gamma camera with thin NaI crystals (9.5 mm) was conducted to clarify the clinical feasibility of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystals. METHODS: FDG images of 27 patients with malignant tumors were obtained by means of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystal and a dedicated PET camera with BGO crystals. The images of bone scintigraphy in 10 cancer patients obtained with the dual-head coincidence gamma camera were compared with those taken by a conventional dual-head gamma camera with thin NaI crystals. RESULTS: Patient-basis sensitivity in 27 patients with neoplasms and lesion-basis sensitivity of the dual-head coincidence gamma camera and the dedicated PET camera were 74.1% and 85.2% (n.s.), 66.7% and 72.2% (n.s.), respectively. The tumor to background FDG uptake ratio derived from the coincidence gamma camera was significantly lower than that derived from the dedicated PET camera (mean +/- s.d.; 3.48 +/- 3.77 vs. 8.12 +/- 8.92, p < 0.0001), but the tumor to background FDG uptake ratio obtained with both methods correlated well (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Similar whole body bone scans were obtained with the dual-head coincidence gamma camera and the conventional dual-head gamma camera in all 10 patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystals has potentially high clinical applicability for community hospitals.     

Comparison of dual-head coincidence gamma camera FDG imaging with FDG PET in detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis.

Dual-head coincidence gamma camera 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging was compared with FDG PET in the detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. METHODS: Both coincidence gamma camera FDG imaging and FDG PET were performed in a cylindrical phantom containing spheres of different sizes and activity ratios (5:1, 10:1 and 15:1) and in 30 women (age range 32-78 y) with suspected breast cancer. Biopsies or mastectomies were performed in all patients. Images were visually assessed, and the count ratio between tumor and normal tissue (T/N ratio) was calculated. RESULTS: In the phantom studies, coincidence gamma camera imaging visualized the smallest sphere (1.0 cm) at a ratio of 15:1 but not at ratios of 5:1 and 10:1. Coincidence gamma camera imaging visualized the other spheres (> or =1.3 cm) at all ratios. PET visualized all spheres at all ratios. In the clinical studies, 22 of 26 breast carcinomas detected by PET were also detected by coincidence gamma camera imaging.. Coincidence gamma camera imaging detected all of the carcinomas > or =2 cm in diameter (n = 10) and 12 of 16 carcinomas <2 cm. In breast carcinomas detected by both PET and coincidence gamma camera imaging, the T/N ratio in non-attenuation-corrected PET (7.12 +/- 7.13) was significantly higher than in coincidence gamma camera imaging (2.90 +/- 1.47, P < 0.005). Four of 8 axillary lymph node metastases detected by PET were detected by coincidence gamma camera imaging. Of 9 axillary lymph node metastases <1.0 cm in diameter, 7 and 3 were detected by PET and coincidence gamma camera imaging, respectively. CONCLUSION: Coincidence gamma camera imaging is useful in detecting breast carcinoma > or =2 cm in diameter but is not reliable for breast carcinoma <2 cm in diameter. Coincidence gamma camera imaging may be useless or even dangerous in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis.     

Cardiac fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging using a dual-head gamma camera with coincidence detection: a clinical pilot study

Dual-headed gamma cameras with coincidence detection (MCD) are increasingly used for imaging of positron-emitting tracers, such as fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). In this study, we examined differences between FDG MCD and FDG positron emission tomography (PET) as the gold standard to determine whether FDG MCD could be used for assessment of myocardial viability in daily practice. Nineteen patients with a previous myocardial infarction (17 men; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 44%±13%) underwent FDG MCD, FDG PET, resting echocardiography and technetium-99m tetrofosmin gated single-photon emission tomography (SPET). At the 50% threshold value for FDG PET, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for FDG MCD was 0.77±0.03. In 107 dyssynergic segments on echocardiography and 151 segments with hypoperfusion on ^99mTc-tetrofosmin SPET, the specificity of FDG MCD for the detection of myocardial viability was 72% and 76% respectively, with a sensitivity of 69% and 72% respectively. Regional analysis showed a significantly lower agreement of FDG MCD and FDG PET in the inferior and septal regions (58% for dyssynergic segments and 65% for segments with hypoperfusion), as compared with the other regions (85% for dyssynergic regions, P<0.05, and 86% for segments with hypoperfusion, P<0.05). Five patients (26%), who all had a body mass index ≥25% kg/m², showed more than 25% disagreement between FDG MCD and FDG PET. Because of the moderate overall agreement with FDG PET, the low sensitivity in akinetic or dyskinetic regions and the low agreement in the inferior and septal regions, further studies and implementations of technical developments are needed before FDG MCD can be introduced into clinical practice for the assessment of myocardial viability. Received 4 December 1999 and in revised form 5 February 2000     

胸部模型~(18)F-FDG双探头符合显像实验研究

目的　评价18F 脱氧葡萄糖 (FDG)双探头符合线路显像对肺部结节的探测效果。方法用胸部模型作双探头符合显像。结果　符合计数率足够时 ,衰减校正 (AC)和非衰减校正 (NOAC)均能见到≥ 11mm的球体 ,AC的靶 /本底 (T/B)比值小于NOAC ,大结节的T/B值比小结节高。增大T/B值则结节的分辨率提高。随着符合计数率的减低 ,NOAC仅能发现≥ 15mm的球体 ,而AC能发现所有的球体。结论　符合计数率适当时产生的图像最佳 ,AC比NOAC能发现更小的结节。     

Initial experience with a prototype dual-crystal (LSO/NaI) dual-head coincidence camera in oncology

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of a prototype dual-crystal [lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO)/sodium iodide (NaI)] dual-head coincidence camera (DHC) for PET and SPET (LSO-PS), in comparison to BGO-PET with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in oncology. This follows earlier reports that LSO-PS has noise-equivalent counting (NEC) rates comparable to partial ring BGO-PET, i.e. clearly higher than standard NaI DHCs. Twenty-four randomly selected oncological patients referred for whole-body FDG-PET underwent BGO-PET followed by LSO-PS. Four nuclear medicine physicians were randomised to read a single scan modality, in terms of lesion intensity, location and likelihood of malignancy. BGO-PET was considered the gold standard. Forty-eight lesions were classified as positive with BGO-PET, of which LSO-PS identified 73% (95% CI 60–86%). There was good observer agreement for both modalities in terms of intensity, location and interpretation. Lesions were missed by LSO-PS in 13 patients in the chest (n=6), neck (n=3) and abdomen (n=4). The diameter of these lesions was estimated to be 0.5–1 cm. Initial results justify further evaluation of LSO-PS in specific clinical situations, especially if a role as an instrument of triage for PET is foreseen.     

Comparative impact of standard approach, FDG PET and FDG dual-head coincidence gamma camera imaging in preoperative staging of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

We prospectively compared the impact of the standard approach, of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and of FDG dual-head coincidence gamma camera imaging (DHC) in preoperative staging of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition to traditional staging, 42 patients were studied with a PET system and a DHC system. The number of lesions detected on DHC and on PET were compared independently of the proof of a tumoural invasion. Then, for the sub-group of lesions with the proof of a tumoural invasion, the sensitivity of the different imaging modalities was compared. Finally, stagings were compared with final staging established by histopathological findings (n=28), additional imaging modalities (n=4), clinical and traditional imaging follow-up over at least 4 months. DHC detected 105 of the 145 lesions considered as pathological on PET (73%, P=0.01), with a concurrence of 89% (NS) in lesions larger than 1.5 cm, and only 17% (P=0.03) in those smaller or equal to 1 cm. Traditional staging detected 87 of the 114 verified tumoural lesions (76%), PET 110/114 (96%, P=0.01 vs traditional staging), DHC 88/114 (77%, NS vs traditional staging, P=0.01 vs PET). PET correctly predicted the N stage in 39/42 (93%) patients, DHC in 38/42 (90%), and computed tomography in 32/42 (76%). PET correctly predicted the M stage in 42/42 (100%) patients, DHC in 41/42 (98%), and traditional staging in 38/42 (90%). Identical NM staging was obtained with DHC and PET in 38/42 (90%) patients. Compared to traditional NM staging, PET correctly up-staged 9/42 (21%) patients and down-staged 3/42 (7%), with one additional false N up-staging. DHC correctly up-staged 7/42 (17%) patients and down-staged 3/42 (7%), with one additional false N down-staging. PET correctly reclassified 4/42 (9.5%) patients from resectable to unresectable and incorrectly reclassified one. DHC correctly reclassified 3/42 (7%) patients without false therapeutic reclassification. Although DHC detected fewer lesions than PET, DHC is a possible alternative to PET since the impact on staging was high as compared with traditional staging and was very similar to that of PET.     

18F-FDG for the staging of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: Comparison of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with dedicated PET

Coincidence imaging with a dual-head gamma camera may offer a cost-effective alternative to dedicated PET. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of coincidence imaging and PET in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Thirty-one patients were studied after thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablation. They were injected with a single dose of 300 MBq 18F-FDG. Scanning was performed on a dedicated PET system after 1 hr, and on a coincidence gamma camera after 4 hrs. Based on a lesion-by-lesion comparison, coincidence imaging and PET concurred in 69% of 118 lesions. Based on lesion size, concurrence was 96% in lesions larger than 1.5 cm, and 62% in those between 1 and 1.5 cm. Lesions smaller than 1 cm could not be identified with coincidence imaging. Identical staging was obtained with coincidence imaging and PET in 26/31 patients (84%). In four patients FDG accumulating lesions were shown by both the coincidence camera and the dedicated scanner, but not detectable with any other imaging means and were confirmed histologically on surgery. Although a coincidence camera is technically inferior to a dedicated PET scanner, it may provide clinically useful results in situations were a lesion of sufficient size and FDG uptake is to be expected, e.g. when evaluating a known lesion for malignancy.     

Evaluation of FDG uptake by renal malignancies (primary tumor or metastases) using a coincidence detection gamma camera.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of FDG scanning using an ordinary gamma camera equipped with coincidence detection (CDET) for 2 renal cancer indications: characterization and staging of renal masses before nephrectomy and search for recurrence after nephrectomy. METHODS: Between September 1997 and June 1998, a whole-body scan and at least 1 tomoscintigram were obtained on 23 occasions in 22 patients (fasting for at least 6 h) using a Prism XP 2000 CDET gamma camera; scanning was begun 45 min after intravenous injection of 150-250 MBq FDG. RESULTS: Postoperative histologic evidence was obtained from 13 of 16 patients who underwent FDG using a CDET gamma camera before renal surgery; 4 renal masses did not accumulate FDG (3 true-negatives, 1 false-negative), whereas 9 renal tumors accumulated FDG (8 true-positives, 1 false-positive). In the other 3 patients, only 1 extrarenal site of FDG uptake was checked and confirmed on histologic examination: a bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma in 2 cases and lymph node metastasis from a squamous cell carcinoma (3 true-positives). The primary local and regional staging of the malignant renal tumors was accurate in the 9 patients who underwent nephrectomy (8 true-negatives, 1 true-positive). The primary distant staging was positive in 1 case (focus in the chest corresponding to a probable true-positive on follow-up). In the 7 examinations performed because of suspected recurrence of renal cell carcinoma several months after nephrectomy, metastases were visualized by FDG in 4 patients, confirmed by biopsy in 2 patients, and confirmed by conventional imaging or follow-up (or both) in 2 patients. The other 3 patients had negative FDG scans, corresponding to probable true-negative results on follow-up. CONCLUSION: FDG using a CDET gamma camera can be used effectively for the staging and restaging of renal tumors and might be useful for characterization of the primary renal tumor in doubtful cases.     

Imaging of lung cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: comparison of a dual-head gamma camera in coincidence mode with a full-ring positron emission tomography system

Dual-head gamma cameras operated in coincidence mode are a new approach for tumour imaging using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of such a camera system in comparison with a full-ring positron emission tomography (PET) system in patients with lung cancer. Twenty-seven patients (1 female, 26 males, age 62±9 years) with lung cancer or indeterminate pulmonary nodules were studied on the same day with a full-ring PET scanner (Siemens ECAT EXACT) and a coincidence gamma camera system (ADAC Vertex MCD). Sixty minutes after injection of 185–370 MBq FDG, a scan of the chest was performed with the full-ring system. Approximately 2 h p.i., the coincidence camera study was performed. Coincidence gamma camera (CGC) and PET images with (PETac) and without attenuation correction (PETnac) were analysed independently by two blinded observers. In addition, FDG uptake in primary tumours and involved lymph nodes was quantified relative to normal contralateral lung (T/L ratios). All primary tumours were histologically proven. The lymph node status was histologically determined in 23 patients. In four patients, no lymph node sampling was performed because of extensive disease or concurrent illnesses. In the 27 patients, 25 primary lung cancers and two metastatic lesions were histologically diagnosed. The number of coincidences per centimetre axial field of view was 3.33±0.93×10⁵ for the CGC and 1.09±0.36×10⁶ for the dedicated PET system. All primary tumours (size: 4.6±2.6 cm) were correctly identified in the CGC and dedicated PET studies. T/L ratios were 4.7±2.5 for CGC and 6.9±2.8 for PETnac (P <0.001). Histopathological evaluation revealed lymph node metastases in 11 of 88 sampled lymph node stations (size: 2.3±1.0 cm). All lymph node metastases were identified in the PETac studies, while PETnac detected 10/11 and CGC 8/11. For positive lymph nodes that were visible in CGC and PETnac studies, T/L ratios were 3.7±2.3 for CGC and 6.6±3.1 for PETnac (P=0.02). The diameters of false-negative lymph nodes in the CGC studies were 0.75, 1.5 and 2 cm. False-positive FDG uptake in lymph nodes was found in two patients with all three imaging methods. For all lesions combined, T/L ratios in CGC relative to PETnac studies decreased significantly with decreasing lesion size (r=0.62; P<0.001). In conclusion, compared with a full-ring PET system the sensitivity of CGC imaging for detection of lung cancer is limited by a lower image contrast which deteriorates with decreasing lesion size. Nevertheless, the ability of CGC imaging to detect pulmonary lesions with a diameter of at least 2 cm appears to be similar to that of a full-ring system. Both systems provide a similar specificity for the evaluation of lymph node involvement. Received 29 August and in revised form 7 December 1998     

18F-FDG心肌PET显像检测存活心肌的临床评价

目的 评价＾１８Ｆ－脱氧葡萄糖（ＦＤＧ）ＰＥＴ心肌葡萄糖代谢与＾９９ｍＴｃ－甲氧基异腈（ＭＩＢＩ）心肌灌注显像相结合对存活心肌的诊断价值。方法 ９０例临床确认为陈旧性心肌梗塞（ＯＭＩ）患者，男８０例，女１０例，平均年龄５５．８±９．７岁。所有患者行心肌灌注显像和心肌代谢显像，均做超声心动图心功能测定，其中７６例做冠状动脉造影。血运重建术后，３６例复查超声心动图，测定心功能（Ａ组）；２４例复查心肌灌     

Value of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose imaging with dual-head gamma camera in coincidence mode: comparison with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected recurrent head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the value of dual-head gamma-camera (DHGC) imaging in the coincidence mode using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in differentiating recurrent tumor from posttreatment changes in previously treated head and neck cancer. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study performed with the approval of our Institutional Review Board. Twenty-nine patients with suspected recurrent head and neck cancers were prospectively enrolled in this study. Dual-head gamma-camera imaging in the coincidence mode followed computed tomography (CT; n = 24)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 5) within a period of 1 week (mean = 3.5 days) in all patients. Thirteen patients had definite pathologic confirmation of recurrence by undergoing a biopsy. Sixteen patients, however, did not have a definite pathologic confirmation and were followed clinically. The mean duration of follow-up for the subgroup of patients who were followed clinically was 22.8 months (range: 4-48 months). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for CT/MRI and DHGC imaging in the coincidence mode were calculated. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CT/MRI in the detection of recurrent cancer were 76.5%, 58.3%, 72.2%, 63.6%, and 69%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity (100%), NPV (100%), and accuracy (82.8%) of DHGC imaging in the coincidence mode were superior to that of CT/MRI. Dual-head gamma-camera imaging in the coincidence mode had a specificity (58.3%) and PPV (77.3%) comparable to those of CT/MRI. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that modified positron emission tomography with DHGC imaging in the coincidence mode is a useful tool in the assessment of recurrent head and neck cancer.     

Baseline/post-nitrate Tc-99m tetrofosmin mismatch for the assessment of myocardial viability in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: Comparison with baseline Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintigraphy/FDG PET imaging

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) flow/metabolic mismatch is considered the nuclear medicine gold standard for the assessment of myocardial viability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline/nitrate technetium 99m tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) mismatch may provide equivalent clinical information. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 23 patients (aged 62 +/- 10 years, 19 men) with previous myocardial infarction (16 anterior, 4 inferior, and 3 anterior plus inferior) and postischemic heart failure (gated SPECT [G-SPECT] ejection fraction, 26% +/- 8%). All patients underwent Tc-99m tetrofosmin G-SPECT at rest and after nitrates (intravenous isosorbide dinitrate, 0.2 mg/mL, 10 mL/h) as well as a fluorine 18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET scan. Regional wall motion analysis was performed with quantitative G-SPECT (QGS). Myocardial dysfunction was defined as a regional QGS score of 2 or greater. Regional perfusion was assessed by quantitative perfusion score (QPS) providing percent Tc-99m tetrofosmin uptake in a 20-segment model. Semiquantitative analysis of FDG uptake was performed by use of polar maps generated by Siemens ECAT HR + software. In areas with a perfusion rate lower than 80%, PET viability was identified by a normalized FDG percent uptake/baseline Tc-99m tetrofosmin percent uptake ratio greater than 1.2. We analyzed 460 segments; 298 (64%) were dysfunctional by QGS analysis. Of these, 170 were viable by PET imaging whereas 128 were nonviable. Regional Tc-99m tetrofosmin uptake was higher in viable than in nonviable segments both at rest (60% +/- 24% vs 42% +/- 12%, P <.01) and after nitrates (67% +/- 20% vs 41% +/- 18%, P <.01). According to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a cutoff value of 63% for resting as well as post-nitrate G-SPECT provided the highest diagnostic accuracy for the detection of myocardial viability (67% and 72% at rest and after nitrates, respectively). When the same algorithm used for the comparison with PET (normalized nitrate percent uptake/baseline percent uptake) was applied to G-SPECT, we obtained the highest agreement with PET (accuracy, 93%; sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 92%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, perfusion data alone, both at rest and after nitrates, do not allow an accurate estimate of myocardial viability. In dysfunctioning segments, the analysis of rest/post-nitrate Tc-99m tetrofosmin mismatch provides results similar to those obtained by PET flow/metabolic mismatch.     

Early prediction of survival following induction chemotherapy with DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) using FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a high rate of recurrence. Induction chemotherapy with DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) before chemoradiotherapy could lead to the best disease control of inoperable stage III/IV HNSCC but with an increased risk of acute toxicity. Early assessment of therapeutic efficacy is a key issue in considering the benefit of escalation in a poor prognosis population.

Methods

Patients with stage III/IV HNSCC, in whom DCF induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy had been validated by a multidisciplinary team, were prospectively included in the study. FDG PET/CT scans were performed in all patients before and after two of the three cycles of DCF. EORTC99 criteria were used to evaluate PET responses as follows: group 1 (metabolic responders) showing a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), and subgroup 0 (metabolic nonresponders) showing stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). The primary endpoint for monitoring patients was event-free survival (EFS). EFS probabilities between the two groups were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistically compared using the log-rank test.

Results

Fifteen consecutive patients (14?men, 1?woman; age 57.5?±?6.2?years, mean?±?SD) were analysed. Therapeutic assessment by PET/CT demonstrated CR in four patients, PR in six, SD in four and PD in one. Among the ten patients with a metabolic response (group 1), none had relapsed at the time of this report, while four of five patients with no metabolic response (group 0) showed recurrence within an average of 9.0?±?1.6?months. Median EFS was, respectively, 18.9?months (3.8–25.3?months) and 10.2?months (7.5–12.7?months) in group 1 and group 0. The corresponding 1-year EFS rates were 100?% and 20?%, respectively. The difference in EFS between the two groups was statistically significant (p?=?0.0014).

Conclusion

Early therapeutic response demonstrated on FDG PET/CT after two cycles of induction chemotherapy with DCF in patients with inoperable stage III/IV HNSCC seems to be a predictive factor for EFS.     

Comparisons between glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose and 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer patients with bone lesions

AIM: To compare 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-D-glucose(¹⁸F-FDG) and ¹⁸F-sodium (¹⁸F-NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) accuracy in breast cancer patients with clinically/radiologically suspected or known bone metastases.METHODS: A total of 45 consecutive patients with breast cancer and the presence or clinical/biochemical or radiological suspicion of bone metastatic disease underwent ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT. Imaging results were compared with histopathology when available, or clinical and radiological follow-up of at least 1 year. For each technique we calculated: Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), overall accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, error rate, and Youden’s index. McNemar’s χ² test was used to test the difference in sensitivity and specificity between the two diagnostic methods. All analyses were computed on a patient basis, and then on a lesion basis, with consideration ofthe density of independent lesions on the co-registered CT (sclerotic, lytic, mixed, no-lesions) and the divergent site of disease (skull, spine, ribs, extremities, pelvis). The impact of adding ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT to the work-up of patients was also measured in terms of change in their management due to ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT findings.RESULTS: The two imaging methods of ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT were significantly different at the patient-based analysis: Accuracy was 86.7% and 84.4%, respectively (McNemar’s χ² = 6.23, df = 1, P = 0.01). Overall, 244 bone lesions were detected in our analysis. The overall accuracy of the two methods was significantly different at lesion-based analysis (McNemar’s χ² = 93.4, df = 1, P < 0.0001). In the lesion density-based and site-based analysis, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provided more accurate results in the detection of CT-negative metastasis (P < 0.002) and vertebral localizations (P < 0.002); ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT was more accurate in detecting sclerotic (P < 0.005) and rib lesions (P < 0.04). ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT led to a change of management in 3 of the 45 patients (6.6%) by revealing findings that were not detected at ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.CONCLUSION: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a reliable imaging tool in the detection of bone metastasis in most cases, with a diagnostic accuracy that is slightly, but significantly, superior to that of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT in the general population of breast cancer patients. However, the extremely high sensitivity of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT can exploit its diagnostic potential in specific clinical settings (i.e., small CT-evident sclerotic lesions, high clinical suspicious of relapse, and negative ¹⁸F-FDG PET and conventional imaging).     

Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study

BackgroundRecent studies demonstrated a significant improvement in the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, coronary stent assessment is still challenging, especially because of beam-hardening artifacts due to metallic stent struts and high atherosclerotic burden of non-stented segments. Adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion assessed by CT (CTP) recently demonstrated to be a feasible and accurate tool for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, scarce data are available on the performance of CTP in patients with previous stent implantation.Aim of the studyWe aim to assess the diagnostic performance of CCTA alone, CTP alone and CCTA plus CTP performed with a new scanner generation using quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as standard of reference.MethodsWe will enroll 300 consecutive patients with previous stent implantation, referred for non-emergent and clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) due to suspected ISR or progression of CAD in native coronary segments. All patients will be subjected to stress myocardial CTP and a rest CCTA. The first 150 subjects will undergo static CTP scan, while the following 150 patients will undergo dynamic CTP scan. Measurement of invasive FFR will be performed during ICA when clinically indicated.ResultsThe primary study end points will be: 1) assessment of the diagnostic performance (diagnostic rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy) of CCTA, CTP, combined CCTA-CTP and concordant CCTA-CTP vs. ICA as standard of reference in a territory-based and patient-based analysis; 2) assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA, CTP, combined CCTA-CTP and concordant CCTA-CTP vs. invasive FFR as standard of reference in a territory-based analysis.ConclusionsThe ADVANTAGE study aims to provide an answer to the intriguing question whether the combined anatomical and functional assessment with CCTA plus CTP may have higher diagnostic performance as compared to CCTA alone in identifying stented patients with significant ISR or CAD progression.