Safety and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement by flap reelevation in high myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment following primary procedures for high myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Corneal Diseases and Excimer Laser Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. METHODS: This prospective observational study of retreatment comprised a cohort of 109 eyes having primary LASIK for high myopia and astigmatism with a spherical equivalent (SE) of -9.70 diopters (D) +/- 4.06 (SD). Twenty-four eyes (22%) with an initial myopic SE of -9.83 +/- 3.50 D, a comparable subset of the entire group (P < .05), had retreatment for residual myopia (-3.02 +/- 2.17 D) to improve uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) by reelevating the corneal flap and ablating the stromal bed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after retreatment was 12.8 +/- 5.1 months (range 1.5 to 24 months; 19 eyes >/=6 months, 13 eyes > or = 12 months). The mean myopic SE was reduced to +0.53 +/- 0.62 D at 1 week, +0.05 +/- 0.50 D at 1 month, +0.30 +/- 0.50 D at 6 months, and +0.18 +/- 0.42 D at the latest follow-up, 12.8 months. At the latest review, 62% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia and 100% were within +/-1.00 D. The mean refraction did not alter statistically between 1 week and subsequent times. The mean UCVA improved from 6/30 prior to retreatment to 6/9 at the latest follow-up. Uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better, 6/9 or better, and 6/12 or better was achieved by 33.0%, 75.0%, and 95.8% of eyes, respectively. No significant complications that led to a loss of best corrected visual acuity were encountered, although retreatment procedures were more uncomfortable than primary procedures and self-limiting; epithelial ingrowth that did not threaten vision was common, and 2 patients complained of nighttime visual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment of residual myopia by reelevating the flap was relatively safe and predictable, with a low risk of sight-threatening complications. However, longer term studies may be required to detect late complications.     

LASIK for myopia with the Zeiss meditec MEL 80

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate a new high-speed, small spot-scanner laser for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism between -1.00 and -8.25 diopters (D) and up to -2.75 D astigmatism underwent LASIK treatment using the MEL 80 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and aberrometry. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 20/20, which improved to 20/18 postoperatively. Postoperative UCVA was 20/20 at 1 month and 20/18 at 1 year. Uncorrected visual acuity > or = 20/20 was achieved in 58 (83%) of 70 eyes at 1 month and in 60 (88%) of 68 eyes at 1 year. The average refractive error before LASIK was -4.41 +/- 1.98 D. The mean residual refractive error was 0.14 +/- 0.31 D at 1 month and 0.13 +/- 0.30 D at 1 year. At 1-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively, 66 (94%) of 70 eyes and 65 (96%) of 68 eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refractive correction. No eye lost two lines. At 1 month 17% of eyes and at 1 year 13% of eyes gained two lines or more. Between 1-month and 1-year follow-up, 100% of eyes were stable. Mean root-mean-square high order aberration changed from 0.20 microm preoperatively to 0.28 microm postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The MEL 80 is effective and safe in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术术后早期应用卡替洛尔滴眼液对屈光状态的影响

目的 评估准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（LASIK）术后早期应用盐酸卡替洛尔滴眼液对屈光状态及眼压的影响。 设计 前瞻性比较性病例系列。研究对象 2009年11月-2011年9月北京同仁医院行LASIK手术的近视患者32例（32眼）。 方法 试验组15眼LASIK术后第1周开始使用2%盐酸卡替洛尔滴眼液每日2次,低中度近视患者持续1个月,高度近视患者持续1.5个月。对照组17眼术后不使用2%盐酸卡替洛尔滴眼液。术前、术后1、3、6个月进行显然验光、Oculyzer眼前节测量系统、眼压等检查。主要指标 等效球镜度、角膜后表面高度、眼压。结果 试验组术后1、3、6个月时等效球镜度分别为（-0.150±0.742）、（-0.170±0.595）和（-0.525±0.618）D;对照组分别为（-0.258±0.581）、（-0.290±0.657）和（-0.459±0.591）D（P均＞0.05）。试验组术后1、3、6个月时角膜后表面高度分别为（7.47±2.326）、（6.60±3.158）和（5.86±2.610）μm;对照组分别为（6.59±3.355）、（7.35±3.622）和（7.33±2.992）μm（P均＞0.05）。试验组术后1、3、6个月眼压分别为（7.80±0.941）、（8.07±1.534）、（8.70±1.337） mm Hg;对照组分别为（9.35±2.827）、（9.59±2.717）、（8.73±1.580）mm Hg。术后1个月时试验组和对照组眼压有统计学差异（P=0.045）,余时间点均无统计学差异。结论 LASIK术后早期应用盐酸卡替洛尔滴眼液通过降低眼压可能对屈光状态具有稳定作用。（眼科,2013,22：49-52）     

Visual outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with moderate or high myopia and compound myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery for the treatment of moderate to high myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with moderate (-6.0 to -8.0 diopters [D]) and high (greater than -8.00) myopia treated with wavefront-guided LASIK using the WaveScan linked to the CustomVue system (AMO USA, Inc.). Eyes were analyzed preoperatively and 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 38.4 years +/- 7.14 (SD). Eighty-nine eyes of 45 patients were evaluated at 3 months and 50 eyes of 25 patients at 12 months. No eye was retreated during the study. The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was -8.10 +/- 0.98 D (range -6.00 to -10.63 D) preoperatively and -0.33 +/- 0.55 D (range -1.625 to 1.375 D) 12 months postoperatively. Ninety percent of the eyes were within +/-1.00 D of the intended correction and 64.0%, within +/-0.50 D. For all eyes, the safety index was 1.00 and the efficacy index, 1.18. CONCLUSION: The data support the safety and efficacy of correcting moderate to high myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using wavefront-guided LASIK.     

Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix system

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the Zyoptix system. METHODS: Twelve patients (24 eyes) underwent wavefront-guided LASIK with the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix system. Uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were measured at postoperative day 1, week 1, and months 1 and 3. A subjective vision quality questionnaire evaluated light sensitivity, dryness, tearing, glare, halos, ghost images, and difficulties in night driving, preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean sphere was -3.70 +/- 2.33 D (range -0.50 to -8.00 D), mean cylinder was -0.90 +/- 0.98 D (range 0 to -3.00 D), and mean spherical equivalent refraction was -4.15 +/- 2.16 D (range -1.38 to -8.25 D). Three-month postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia in 17 eyes (70.8%) and within +/- 1.00 D in 22 eyes (91.7%). At 3 months postoperatively, no eyes lost any lines of BSCVA and eight eyes (33.3%) gained 2 lines. The ratio of postoperative BSCVA to preoperative BSCVA (safety) was 1.05 +/- 0.09 (range 1.00 to 1.20) at 1 month and 1.07 +/- 0.10 (range 1.00 to 1.29) at 3 months. The ratio of postoperative UCVA to preoperative BSCVA (efficacy) was 0.96 +/- 0.12 (range 0.80 to 1.20) at 1 month and 0.95 +/- 0.12 (range 0.8 to 1.2) at 3 months. The subjective vision quality questionnaire revealed less tearing, fewer halos, and less difficulty in night driving after wavefront-guided LASIK. Comparison of higher order optical aberrations before and after surgery was not done. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix system was safe and effective in correcting low to moderate myopic refractive error.     

Wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia with the Technolas 217z: results at 3 years

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of wavefront-guided LASIK in patients with low to high myopia. METHODS: The study included 316 eyes of 158 patients; 172 eyes with low to moderate myopia (< or = 6.00 diopters [D]) and 144 eyes with high myopia (> or = 6.25 D). Preoperative wavefront analysis was performed with the Hartmann-Shack aberrometer, and LASIK was done with the Technolas 217z excimer laser. Follow-up was 36 months. Safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SE) was -6.50 +/- 7.72 D (range: -1.50 to -16.00 D) in the entire study group, -4.91 +/- 1.38 D in the low to moderate myopia group, and -9.41 +/- 2.51 D in the high myopia group. At 36 months, 222 (70%) eyes showed no change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and 67 (21%) eyes gained > or = 1 line. In the low to moderate myopia group, SE of +/- 0.50 D was achieved by 85% of eyes and +/- 1.00 D by 97%, and 65% and 80%, respectively, in the high myopia group. Undercorrection > 0.50 D was observed in 25% (36 eyes) of the high myopia group and 5% (8 eyes) of the low to moderate myopia group. All eyes showed significant reduction in spherical aberration (Z4,0) at 12 months postoperatively with no complications except diffuse lamellar keratitis in 2 eyes (1 eye in each group). CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK is an efficient refractive surgery technique for patients with low to moderate myopia. Higher degrees of myopia may be subject to under- and overcorrection.     

Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D

PURPOSE: To compare laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and LASIK for the correction of high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, single-masked study was conducted. Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia > or = -7.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent manifest refraction) with a cylinder < or = -3.50 D (LASEK group) were compared to patients treated with LASIK (LASIK group) using the same excimer laser (Technolas 217C). Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% was applied for 1 minute in all LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive eyes were included in the study (114 in each group, matched for preoperative refraction). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -8.72 +/- 1.20 D in the LASEK group and -8.74 +/- 1.20 D in the LASIK group (range: -7.00 to -13.75 D) (P = .9). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was significantly lower in LASEK eyes 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P = .0001 for each comparison). No significant differences were found at 3 months postoperatively in UCVA (P = .3), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (P = .2), or in the safety (P = .6) and efficacy (P = .8) indices. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 or better in 34.2% of LASEK eyes and 44.7% of LASIK eyes. Spherical refraction was +0.25 +/- 0.6 D after LASEK and -0.06 +/- 0.5 D after LASIK (P = .0001). Sixty-eight percent of LASEK eyes and 79% of LASIK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction. No LASEK eye versus 7 LASIK eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA. Eight LASEK eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA versus 1 LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after LASEK with intraoperative MMC was significantly slower than after LASIK. Visual outcomes (UCVA, BSCVA, and safety and efficacy indices) 3 months after surgery were similar with both techniques for the correction of high myopia. Ten percent more eyes after LASIK were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis with the VISX Star laser for myopia over -10.0 diopters.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia over -10.00 diopters (D). SETTING: The Eye Institute of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: The prospective study included 332 eyes of 183 patients having LASIK with the VISX Star laser to correct myopia of -10.00 to -18.00 D. The eyes were divided into 3 groups according to the preoperative refraction: Group A (n = 208), -10.00 to -11.90 D; Group B (n = 94), -12.00 to -14.00 D; Group C (n = 30), -14.10 to -18.00 D. The mean follow-up was 12.0 months +/- 5.6 (SD) (range 6 to 37 months). RESULTS: Overall, the mean spherical equivalent decreased 96%, from -11.69 +/- 1.46 D preoperatively to -0.37 +/- 0.80 D postoperatively. The mean astigmatism decreased 72%, from 1.66 +/- 1.22 D to 0.46 +/- 0.53 D. At the last visit, 84.0% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and 96.4% were within +/-2.00 D. An overcorrection of more than +1.00 D was experienced by 1.8% of patients. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/20 or better in 45.8% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 89.5%. Six eyes (1.8%) lost 2 or more lines of best corrected visual acuity; this included 1 eye in which iatrogenic keratectasia developed 18 months after LASIK retreatment. Retreatment was done in 37.0% of eyes at a mean of 6.3 +/- 5.3 months (3 to 32 months) after the initial treatment. At the last examination, 86.0% of eyes in Groups A and B and 70.0% in Group C were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. A significant difference was found between Groups A and C (P =.032). The UCVA was 20/20 in 52.0% of Group A eyes, 38.0% of Group B eyes, and 23.0% of Group C eyes. The difference between Groups A and C was significant (P =.001), but the difference between Groups A and B was not (P =.055). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, LASIK was effective in correcting myopia up to -14.00 D. The efficacy, predictability, and safety were significantly less in eyes with myopia greater than -14.00 D.     

Stability after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderately and extremely myopic eyes

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stability, mechanism, and degree of regression following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in cases with moderate to extreme myopia after 2 years of follow-up. SETTING: Single-center clinical trial. METHODS: Fifty-two eyes of 38 patients were enrolled in the study. One year follow-up was available for 47 eyes of 35 patients and 2 year follow-up for 39 eyes of 27 patients. Eyes were divided into 2 groups based on the level of preoperative myopia: Group 1, moderate to high myopia > or =15.0 diopters (D) (range -7.0 to -15.0 D, n = 24); Group 2, extreme myopia >15.0 D (range -15.3 to -25.8 D, n = 15). Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper(R) microkeratome and the Summit OmniMed excimer laser. Manifest spherical equivalent, mean central keratometry, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured preoperatively and 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Group 1 exhibited a mild myopic shift (mean -0.07 +/- 0.28 D; P >.2) and a mild increase in keratometry (mean 0.05 +/- 0.46 D; P >.6), with an accompanying increase in CCT (mean 7.5 +/- 12.2 microm; (P =.006) at 24 months. Group 2 displayed a significant myopic shift (mean -0.7 +/- 0.7 D; P =.001) and a significant increase in keratometry (mean 0.4 +/- 0.5 D; P =.01), with a mild increase in CCT (mean 2.4 +/- 9.7 microm; P =.35) at 24 months. Corneal ectasia was evident in 1 eye in the extreme myopia group. CONCLUSION: The refractive effect of myopic LASIK up to -15.0 D remained reasonably stable during the second postoperative year. Significant regression of the refractive effect occurred in eyes with higher levels of myopia (>15.0 D), with the risk of progressive ectasia. Extreme caution is recommended when myopic LASIK is performed in eyes with higher levels of myopia.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement after radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To present results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement after radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: Sixteen eyes of 10 patients were treated with LASIK for residual myopia and hyperopia after RK. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.14+/-3.04 D (range, -6.675 to +6.00 D). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 9 eyes, 20/25 in 6 eyes, and 20/30 in 1 eye. Uncorrected visual acuity was better than 20/40 in only 2 eyes. Patients were followed at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year. Mean follow-up was 8.3 months (range, 1 to 17 mo). RESULTS: All eyes received one LASIK enhancement. Mean final spherical equivalent refraction was +0.16+/-0.68 D (range, -1.00 to +1.75 D). No eyes experienced any visual loss. Five eyes gained 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 9 eyes, 20/25 in 6 eyes, and 20/30 in 1 eye. Two eyes of one patient had the previous RK incisions open. CONCLUSION: LASIK was an effective treatment for correction of residual myopia and hyperopia after RK.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -1.50 to -6.00 diopters

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of low and moderate myopia and astigmatism using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser with a modified algorithm. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-six eyes of 257 patients with myopia ranging from -1.50 to -6.00 D and astigmatism of no more than 4.00 D were included. Manifest spherical equivalent refraction, uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity were assessed at 1 month (357 eyes, 90%), 3 months (220 eyes, 56%), and 6 months (168 eyes, 42%) after LASIK. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.60 +/- 1.27 D and mean cylinder was -1.01 +/- 1.08 D. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.12 +/- 0.31 D and mean cylinder was -0.19 +/- 0.33 D. At 6 months follow-up, 158 eyes (94%) had a mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia; 168 eyes (100%) were within +/- 1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 81% (136 eyes) and 20/40 or better in 100%. Two eyes (1.2%) lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to a decentered ablation. No eye lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Our modified LASIK algorithm with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser resulted in safe and predictable outcomes for treatment of low and moderate amounts of myopia and astigmatism.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 laser

PURPOSE: We studied the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate to high simple and compound myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 consecutive patients who had LASIK for myopic astigmatism (64 eyes, astigmatism 3.00 to 9.00 D; myopia 0 to -20.00 D), or simple myopia (28 eyes, myopia -4.00 to -20.00 D; astigmatism 0 to 0.50 D) were retrospectively studied. Mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction (SE) in the myopia group was -8.11 +/- 3.94 D and in the astigmatism group, -8.55 +/- 4.49 D. All eyes underwent LASIK using the Nidek EC-5000 laser by the same surgeon. RESULTS: At 6 months after LASIK in the myopia group versus the astigmatism group, 24 eyes (85%) vs. 54 eyes (84%) were available for follow-up, 12 eyes (50%) vs. 13 eyes (24%) had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20, 19 eyes (79%) vs. 44 eyes (81%) had UCVA of 20/40, 8 eyes (33%) vs. 18 eyes (33%) had SE within +/- 0.50 D, 15 eyes (62%) vs. 39 eyes (72%) had SE within +/- 1.00 D, and mean SE was -1.22 +/- 1.17 D vs. -0.74 +/- 1.46 D. Mean astigmatism (vertexed to the corneal plane) in the astigmatism group was 2.77 D at 0 degrees before surgery and 0.32 D at 7 degrees at 6 months. None of the myopic eyes and three of the astigmatic eyes (5%) lost > or = 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 laser for myopic astigmatism was reasonably effective, predictable, and safe. Astigmatism was under-corrected with the nomogram implemented in this study.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia. SETTING: Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗超高度近视远期疗效分析

目的探讨准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗超高度(等效球镜度数>-10.00 D)近视的远期效果和安全性.方法对99例(173只眼)超高度近视行LASIK矫正,术前屈光度数-10.00～-23.50 D,平均(-13.7±3.6)D(等效球镜),其中-15.00 D以上41只眼.常规行裂隙灯显微镜、三面镜眼底检查、OrbscanⅡ眼前段分析系统、眼压、A超、角膜测厚、电脑验光、散瞳检影、主观验光等检查.术后随访18个月以上.结果术后18个月时裸眼视力≥0.5者148只眼(85.6%),最佳矫正视力高于或等于术前最佳矫正视力者147只眼(84.4%),未见术后最佳矫正视力较术前最佳矫正视力低于2行以上的眼;屈光度数稳定在±1.00 D以下者109只眼(63.0%),术前屈光度数在-14.75 D以下和-15.00 D以上达到±1.00 D内者的百分数分别为73.5%(97只眼/132只眼)和29.3%(12只眼/41只眼).术后角膜后表面前移,术后3个月时后表面顶点距理想球面的距离为(0.069±0.031)mm,18个月为(0.065±0.025)mm,均大于术前的(0.029±0.010)mm;角膜微皱褶2只眼,诉暗视力下降眩光6例(10只眼).结论 LASIK矫正超高度近视有效安全,同时在选择手术适应证方面应谨慎从之.对于屈光度数太高而角膜厚度偏薄者行LASIK应慎重,可考虑其他方法矫正如晶状体屈光手术或联合手术.(中华眼科杂志,2004,40816-818)     

Results of resident-performed laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of resident-performed laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Rush University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Chicago, Illinois, USA. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 44 consecutive eyes of 22 patients who had LASIK performed from August 2000 through February 2002. Based on preoperative spherical equivalent, the eyes were divided into a low myopia group (A) (-1.0 to -6.0 diopter [D]) and a higher myopia group (B) (> -6.01 D). Preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) were measured and analyzed within each group. Patients had at least 2 follow-up visits, with the second visit occurring between 1 and 9 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean SE in Group A was -3.93 D +/- 1.53 (SD) and in Group B, -8.49 +/- 1.70 D. At the final visit, the SE in Group A decreased to -0.29 +/- 0.55 D and in Group B, -1.09 +/- 0.87 D. The UCVA in Group A at the final visit was 20/20 or better in 43% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes. In Group B, the UCVA was 20/20 or better in 31% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 75% of eyes. In all eyes, the BCVA improved by 1 line in 16% or remained the same in 84%. No eyes lost any lines of BCVA. The SE taken at the last visit was within +/-0.5 D in 69% of all eyes and within +/-1.0 D in 82% of all eyes. The incidence of patients needing retreatment in resident-performed LASIK surgery was 3 of 44 (6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis performed by residents is a safe and effective procedure for correction of refractive error. Postoperative UCVA, refractive error, retreatment rate, and loss of BCVA were consistent with published results from nonresident surgeons. These results also exceeded the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirements for LASIK surgery.     

SMILE与飞秒激光制瓣LASIK治疗近视的疗效对比

目的:比较VisuMax飞秒激光角膜基质透镜切除术(small incision lenticule extraction,SMILE)与飞秒激光制瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(femtosecond laser assisted LASIK,FEMTO LASIK)治疗近视的临床效果。方法:该研究纳入的近视及近视散光患者中,42例83眼接受了VisuMax飞秒激光SMILE手术,47例94眼接受了非球面切削的FEMTO LASIK。通过手术前及手术后1d;1wk;1,3mo的检查结果评价两种手术的安全性、有效性、预测性、稳定性及其不良事件。结果:术后3mo,平均安全性指数SMILE组为1.10±0.16,FEMTO LASIK组为1.09±0.16;平均有效性指数两组分别为1.10±0.16,1.08±0.12。术后3mo时等效球镜值在±1.00D范围内者两组分别为82眼(98.8%)和91眼(96.8%);±0.50D范围内者两组分别为73眼(88.0%)和78眼(83.0%)。术后3mo时等效球镜分别为0.11±0.23,0.08±0.25D。两组均无明显并发症。结论:VisuMax飞秒激光角膜基质透镜取出术与飞秒激光制瓣的非球面切削LASIK治疗近视同样安全有效、有很好的可预测性和稳定性。     

200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism: six and 12 month outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability in the treatment of myopic astigmatism with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using the 200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser. SETTING: SynsLaser Clinic, Troms?, Norway. METHODS: This retrospective study included 110 eyes treated with LASIK and 87 eyes treated with PRK that were available for evaluation at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.35 diopters (D) +/- 2.50 (SD) (range -1.13 to -11.88 D) in the LASIK eyes and -4.72 +/- 2.82 D (range -1.00 to -15.50 D) in the PRK eyes. The treated cylinder was 4.00 D in both groups. Eleven (8.5%) LASIK eyes and 8 (7.4%) PRK eyes had secondary surgical procedures before 6 and 12 months, respectively, and were excluded when the 6 and 12 month outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: None of the eyes lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Seventy-seven percent of the LASIK eyes and 78% of the PRK eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better; 98% in both groups achieved 20/40 or better. The SE was within +/-0.5 D of the desired refraction in 83% of the LASIK eyes and 77% of the PRK eyes; it was within +/-1.0 D in 97% and 98%, respectively. The cylinder correction had a mean magnitude of error of 0.04 +/- 0.31 D (range -0.96 to +0.85 D) in the LASIK eyes and 0.02 +/- 0.37 D (range -1.44 to +0.72 D) in the PRK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 1 month and beyond in the LASIK eyes and at 3 months and beyond in the PRK eyes. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this study are comparable to those achieved with lasers that use small-beam technology with a lower frequency, as well as with other types of delivery systems. They suggest that the 200 Hz technology used in the LaserSight LSX excimer laser is safe, effective, and predictable and that with LASIK and PRK the results are stable when treating low to moderate myopia and astigmatism up to 4.0 D.     

Results of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -10 to -19 diopters with a Technolas 217 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia greater than -10.00 D. METHODS: Sixty-five eyes of 37 patients with myopia greater than -10.00 D underwent LASIK. Patients were evaluated on day 1, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and presence of any complication. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.745 +/- 0.234, which improved to 0.8070 +/- 0.237 postoperatively. The average preoperative UCVA was 0.022 +/- 0.02; postoperative UCVA at 6 months was 0.536 +/- 0.255. UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 58% (38 eyes) and 20/20 or better in 26% (17 eyes). The average refractive error before LASIK was -12.64 +/- 2.16 D (range -10.00 to -19.00 D). Mean residual refractive error 1 week following LASIK was -0.63 +/- 1.36 D, which regressed to a mean -1.78 +/- 2.08 D at the end of 6 months. Nineteen eyes (29%) were within +/-0.50 D of intended refractive correction. CONCLUSION: LASIK was partially effective in the correction of high myopia. An initial overcorrection may be programmed to offset the effect of refractive regression.     

Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and contrast sensitivity. DESIGN: Prospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twelve eyes, in 65 patients with myopia and myopia with astigmatism, who underwent LASIK. TESTING AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity using the Snellen visual acuity chart and contrast sensitivity using the CSV 1000 (Vector Vision, Dayton OH) was tested before surgery and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery in patients who underwent LASIK. RESULTS: Contrast sensitivity was depressed for patient eyes with spherical equivalence (SE) between -1.25 diopters (D) and -13.75 D, at 12 cycles/degree for at least 3 months and at 18 cycles/degree for 1 week after LASIK. For patient eyes with SE between -1.25 D and -6.00 D, contrast sensitivity was depressed only at 12 cycles/degree for at least 3 months after LASIK. For patient eyes with SE between -6.00 D and -13.75 D, contrast sensitivity was depressed at 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree 1 week after LASIK but returned toward preoperative levels by 1 month after surgery. Despite the slight decreases in contrast sensitivity, all scores were still within the range of normal values except for 12 cycles/degree for 3 months and 18 cycles/degree at 1 week after surgery in the high myopia group. Although highly myopic patients, compared with patients with low myopia, had slightly less BCVA before surgery, both groups maintained their preoperative BCVA at all postoperative visits. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, we conclude that LASIK has little effect on BCVA and contrast sensitivity for up to 3 months after surgery.     

Comparison of two procedures: photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE: A prospective study was conducted to compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of low to moderate myopia. METHODS: Forty-five patients with a manifest refraction (PRK, -4.54 +/- 0.80; LASIK, -4.82 +/- 1.10) from -1.50 to -6.00 diopters (D) were treated and followed-up for 6 months. In each case, 1 eye received PRK and the other LASIK. The first eye treated, and the surgical method used in the first eye, were randomized. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal haze, and topographic analysis of ablation decentration were examined. RESULTS: The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 35 PRK eyes (77.8%) and 28 LASIK eyes (62.2%) at 6 months (P =.107). At 6 months, 28 eyes (62.2%) that received PRK showed a spherical equivalent of within +/-0.5 D as compared with 24 eyes (53.4%) that received LASIK (P =.393). The amount of ablation decentration was 0.37 +/- 0.25 mm in PRK eyes and 0.49 +/- 0.38 mm in LASIK eyes at 3 months (P =.36). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, PRK and LASIK were found to be similarly effective and predictive of correction in low to moderate myopia. PRK has the advantage of less ablation decentration and is safer than LASIK, so we recommend PRK for eyes with low to moderate myopia.