Time course of action of sugammadex (Org 25969) on rocuronium-induced block in the Rhesus monkey, using a simple model of equilibration of complex formation

Background. Reversal of neuromuscular block can be accomplishedby chemical encapsulation of rocuronium by sugammadex (Org 25969),a synthetic     

Reversal of rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg kg-1) profound neuromuscular block by accidental high dose of sugammadex (40 mg kg-1)

Sugammadex is the first selective relaxant binding agent andreverses rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. A case is reportedin which a patient accidentally received a high dose of sugammadex(40 mg kg^–1) to reverse a rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg kg^–1)profound neuromuscular block. A fast and efficient recoveryfrom profound neuromuscular block was achieved and no adverseevents or other safety concerns were reported.     

Intubating conditions and onset of neuromuscular block of rocuronium (Org 9426); a comparison with suxamethonium

The intubating conditions and neuromuscular blocking profile following 600 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium (Org 9426) have been investigated in patients under various experimental conditions. They were compared with conditions following 1.5 mg.kg-1 suxamethonium, preceded by a precurarising dose (10 mg) of gallamine, and with those in a control group in the absence of a muscle relaxant. Rocuronium produced good to excellent intubating conditions at 60 as well as at 90 s after administration, even though there was only a partial blockade of the adductor pollicis muscle. Intubating conditions following suxamethonium were comparable with those after rocuronium. Half of the control patients could be intubated. The clinical duration and the recovery time of 600 micrograms.kg-1 of rocuronium were 24(4) and 9(3) min (mean(s.d.)), respectively. Rocuronium may have a major advantage over existing non-depolarising muscle relaxants due to the early presence of excellent intubating conditions. The results indicate that rocuronium may replace suxamethonium in procedures in which rapid sequence induction is required.     

Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by the selective relaxant binding agent sugammadex: a dose-finding and safety study

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex (Org 25969) forms a complex with steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents, thereby reversing neuromuscular block. This study investigated the dose-response relation, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sugammadex to reverse rocuronium-induced block. METHODS: Twenty-seven male surgical patients aged 18-64 yr were randomly assigned to receive placebo or sugammadex (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0 mg/kg) for reversal of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using intravenous fentanyl and propofol. Neuromuscular function was assessed using acceleromyography. Sugammadex or placebo was administered at reappearance of T2 of the train-of-four. The primary efficacy variable was the time required for recovery to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9. RESULTS: Sugammadex decreased median recovery time in a dose-dependent manner from 21.0 min in the placebo group to 1.1 min in the group receiving 4.0 mg/kg sugammadex. Doses of sugammadex of 2.0 mg/kg or greater reversed rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block within 3 min. A median of 59-77% of sugammadex was excreted unchanged in the urine within 16 h, mostly in the first 8 h. Sugammadex increased the proportion of the rocuronium dose excreted unchanged in the urine (from a median of 19% in the placebo group to 53% in the 4.0-mg/kg group within 16 h). Sugammadex was safe and well tolerated. No evidence of recurarization was observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: At doses of 2.0 mg/kg or greater, sugammadex safely reversed 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in a dose-dependent manner. Sugammadex enhanced renal excretion of rocuronium and was excreted unchanged by the kidneys.     

Safety and tolerability of single intravenous doses of sugammadex administered simultaneously with rocuronium or vecuronium in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex rapidly reverses rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block. To investigate the effect of combination of sugammadex and rocuronium or vecuronium on QT interval, it would be preferable to avoid the interference of anaesthesia. Therefore, this pilot study was performed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and plasma pharmacokinetics of single i.v. doses of sugammadex administered simultaneously with rocuronium or vecuronium to anaesthetized and non-anaesthetized healthy volunteers. METHODS: In this phase I study, 12 subjects were anaesthetized with propofol/remifentanil and received sugammadex 16, 20, or 32 mg kg(-1) combined with rocuronium 1.2 mg kg(-1) or vecuronium 0.1 mg kg(-1); four subjects were not anaesthetized and received sugammadex 32 mg kg(-1) with rocuronium 1.2 mg kg(-1) or vecuronium 0.1 mg kg(-1) (n=2 per treatment). Neuromuscular function was assessed by TOF-Watch SX monitoring in anaesthetized subjects and by clinical tests in non-anaesthetized volunteers. Sugammadex, rocuronium, and vecuronium plasma concentrations were measured at several time points. RESULTS: No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Fourteen subjects reported 23 AEs after study drug administration. Episodes of mild headache, tiredness, cold feeling (application site), dry mouth, oral discomfort, nausea, increased aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, and moderate injection site irritation were considered as possibly related to the study drug. The ECG and vital signs showed no clinically relevant changes. Rocuronium/vecuronium plasma concentrations declined faster than those of sugammadex. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose administration of sugammadex 16, 20, or 32 mg kg(-1) in combination with rocuronium 1.2 mg kg(-1) or vecuronium 0.1 mg kg(-1) was well tolerated with no clinical evidence of residual neuromuscular block, confirming that these combinations can safely be administered simultaneously to non-anaesthetized subjects. Rocuronium and vecuronium plasma concentrations decreased faster than those of sugammadex, reducing the theoretical risk of neuromuscular block developing over time.     

Recovery characteristics of patients receiving either sugammadex or neostigmine and glycopyrrolate for reversal of neuromuscular block: a randomised controlled trial

Sugammadex more rapidly and reliably reverses rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular block compared with neostigmine, but it is not known if subsequent patient outcomes, including nausea, vomiting and other aspects of recovery are modified. In this study, we compared the recovery characteristics of sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate following reversal of neuromuscular block. This was a single‐centre, randomised, blinded, parallel‐group clinical trial in women undergoing elective day‐surgical laparoscopic gynaecological surgery, with a standardised general anaesthesia regimen that included rocuronium. Neuromuscular block was reversed with either sugammadex 2 mg.kg^?1 or neostigmine 40 μg.kg^?1 and glycopyrrolate 400 μg. The primary outcome was the incidence of nausea and vomiting during the first six postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included other measures of postoperative recovery such as patient symptoms and recovery scores. Three‐hundred and four women were analysed by intention‐to‐treat (sugammadex n = 151, neostigmine n = 153), which included four major protocol violations. There was no significant difference between sugammadex and neostigmine groups in the incidence of early nausea and vomiting (49.0% vs. 51.0%, respectively; OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.59–1.45; p = 0.731). Double vision (11.5% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.044) and dry mouth (71.6% vs. 85.5%; p = 0.003) were less common after sugammadex. Sedation scores at 2 h were also lower after sugammadex (median (IQR [range]) 0 (0‐3 [0‐10]) vs. 2 (0‐4.[0‐10]); p = 0.021). Twenty‐four‐hour recovery scores were not significantly different between groups. Reversal with sugammadex in this patient population did not reduce postoperative nausea or vomiting compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate.     

Reversal of rocuronium‐induced profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

A case is reported in which a child with Duchenne muscular dystrophy received a dose of sugammadex to reverse a rocuronium‐induced profound neuromuscular block. Sugammadex is the first selective relaxant binding agent and reverses rocuronium‐ and vecuronium‐induced neuromuscular block. A fast and efficient recovery from profound neuromuscular block was achieved, and no adverse events or other safety concerns were observed.     

A comparison of antagonism of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia

Volatile anaesthetic agents potentiate neuromuscular blocking agents and retard their rate of reversal. We hypothesised that there was a difference in the rate of reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade based on the selection of inhalation agent. Thirty-eight patients undergoing elective surgical procedures received either sevoflurane or isoflurane, by random allocation. Neuromuscular blockade was induced using rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 followed by continuous intravenous infusion to maintain 90% suppression of the single twitch response. Upon completion of surgery, the rocuronium infusion was discontinued, neostigmine 50 microg.kg-1 and glycopyrrolate 10 microg.kg-1 were administered. Times from reversal to T1 = 25, 50 and 60% and train-of-four ratio = 0.6 were recorded. The mean (SD) times to train-of-four ratio = 0.6 in the isoflurane and sevoflurane groups were 327 (132) and 351 (127) s, respectively. The mean (SD) times to single twitch response T1 = 25, 50 and 60% in the isoflurane group were 81 (33), 161 (59) and 245 (84) s, respectively, and in the sevoflurane group were 95 (35), 203 (88) and 252 (127) s, respectively. It is concluded that reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade is similar during isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia.     

Rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex after continuous infusion of rocuronium in patients with liver dysfunction undergoing hepatic surgery

ObjectiveSugammadex rapidly reverses neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by rocuronium. NMB induced by rocuronium is prolonged in patients with liver dysfunction, because the drug is mainly excreted into the bile. However, the efficacy and safety of sugammadex in terms of reversing rocuronium-induced NMB in patients with liver dysfunction undergoing hepatic surgery have not been evaluated. This observational study investigated the efficacy and safety of sugammadex after continuous infusion of rocuronium in patients with liver dysfunction undergoing hepatic surgery.MethodsRemifentanil/propofol anesthesia was administered to 31 patients: 15 patients in the control group, and 16 patients from a group with liver dysfunction. Rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) was administered, followed by continuous infusion. The enrolled patients were then subdivided into two groups according to the dose of sugammadex. In the first group a single dose of sugammadex (2.0 mg/kg) was given at the reappearance of the second twitch (T2). In the second group a single dose of sugammadex (4.0 mg/kg) was given at the first twitch response if T2 did not reappear in 15 minutes after stopping rocuronium. The primary outcome was time from administration of sugammadex to recovery of a train-of-four ratio to 0.9.ResultsThe dose of rocuronium required in the liver dysfunction group was lower than that in the control group (6.2 vs. 8.2 μg/kg/min, p = 0.002). The mean time from the administration of sugammadex to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 was not significantly different between the liver dysfunction group and the control group (2.2 minutes vs. 2.0 minutes in the 2 mg/kg administration group, p = 0.44 and 1.9 minutes vs. 1.7 minutes in the 4 mg/kg administration group, p = 0.70, respectively). No evidence of recurarization was observed in any of the patients. Most of the adverse events were found to be mild and such events were not related to the use of sugammadex. None of the patients was eliminated from the study because of an adverse event. One patient died due to cholestatic liver cirrhosis because of repeated hepatic surgery.ConclusionSugammadex can rapidly reverse NMB after continuous infusion of rocuronium in patients with liver dysfunction undergoing hepatic surgery. Sugammadex was found to be safe and well tolerated. However, further studies of sugammadex under similar conditions should be conducted involving a large number of patients with liver dysfunction undergoing hepatic surgery.     

Rocuronium 0.3 mg x kg-1 (ED95) induces a normal peak effect but an altered time course of neuromuscular block in patients with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND: In patients with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD) recovery from neuromuscular block is delayed. It has been assumed that this is because of a higher potency of muscle relaxants in this patient cohort. We determined the peak effect, and the time course of action of rocuronium 0.3 mg x kg(-1) (ED(95)) in DMD patients. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (12 with DMD and 12 controls; aged 10-18 years) were studied. All patients were anesthetized with propofol and fentanyl/remifentanil. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored by acceleromyography. After induction all patients received a single dose of rocuronium 0.3 mg x kg(-1). The complete time course of action as onset, peak effect and spontaneous recovery was recorded. RESULTS: The onset time (s) to maximum block was significantly (P < 0.01) prolonged in DMD patients (median: 315; range: 120-465) compared with controls (195, 75-270). The peak effect (% twitch depression relative to baseline) was not different between the groups (DMD: 59-100; controls: 28-100). In the DMD group, recovery was significantly (P < 0.01) delayed compared with controls at all recorded time points. The clinical duration (min) was 40.3 (22-89) in the DMD group vs 9.8 (6-17) in the control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The similar peak effect in both groups does not confirm the thesis of rocuronium having a higher potency in DMD patients. The documented very long recovery after the ED(95) of rocuronium emphasizes the need for careful assessment of neuromuscular function in DMD patients.     

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of Org 9426, a new non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent,in patients anaesthetized with nitrous oxide,halothane and fentanyl

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a new non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, Org 9426, were investigated. Ten patients undergoing elective head and neck surgery and anaesthetized with nitrous oxide, halothane and fentanyl, received a bolus dose of Org 9426 (I mg · kg^?1, 3 × ED₉₀). The isometric contractions of the adductor pollids muscle following ulnar nerve stimulation (0.1 Hz and intermittent TOF) were measured. Blood and urine were sampled over 8 and 24 hr, respectively. Concentrations of Org 9426 and its possible metabolites in plasma and urine were determined using HPLC. Pharmacokinelic variables were calculated by iterative linear least square regression analysis. Intubation conditions were excellent one minute after administration at a neuro-muscular block of 88 (13)% (Mean (CV)). Onset time until maximum block, duration until 25% recovery of twitch height, and recovery from 25 until 75% of twitch height were 1.7 (32), 53 (19) and 20 (37) min, respectively. The TOF reached a ratio of 0.7 after 87 (19) min. Half lives were 1.8(33), 19(34), 131 (62) min, respectively, in a three exponential decay; distribution volume at steady-state and plasma clearance were 0.264 (56) L · kg^{? 1} and 4.0 (21) ml · kg^{? 1} · min_{? 1}, respectively. Plasma concentration at 25% recover)1 of the twitch height was 1.0 mg · L^{? 1}. Within 24 h, 33 (37)% of Org 9426 was excreted unchanged in the urine. Metabolites were absent both in plasma and urine. We conclude that the difference in potency between Org 9426 and vecuronium is similar to the difference between their effective concentrations. Org 9426 mimics vecuronium in its time-course of action and pharmacokinetic behaviour and produces excellent intubaling conditions one minute following the administration of I mg · kg^{? 1}.     

Piboserod (SB 207266), a selective 5-HT4 receptor antagonist, reduces serotonin potentiation of neurally-mediated contractile responses of human detrusor muscle

The aim of this study is to evaluate the potency of piboserod (SB 207266), a selective 5-HT₄ receptor antagonist, at inhibiting the 5-HT₄-mediated potentiating effect of serotonin (5-HT) on the neurally-mediated contractile responses of human detrusor strips to electrical field stimulations (EFS). Strips of human detrusor muscle were mounted in Krebs-HEPES buffer under a resting tension of 500 mg and EFS (20 Hz, 1 ms duration at 300 mA for 5 s) was applied continuously at 1 min intervals. After stabilization of the EFS-induced contractions, concentration-response curves to 5-HT (0.1 nM–100 M) were constructed in the absence or presence of 1 or 100 nM of piboserod. The experiments were performed in the presence of methysergide (1 M) and ondansetron (3 M) to block 5HT₁/5HT₂ and 5-HT₃ receptors, respectively. 5-HT potentiated the contractile responses to EFS of human bladder strips in a concentration-dependent manner, with a maximum mean of 60.0±19.9% of the basal EFS-evoked contractions. Piboserod did not modify the basal contractions but concentration-dependently antagonized the ability of 5-HT to enhance bladder strip contractions to EFS. In presence of 1 and 100 nM of piboserod, the maximal 5-HT-induced potentiations were reduced to 45.0±7.9 and 38.7±8.7%, respectively. A mean apparent antagonist dissociation constant value (K_B) of 0.56±0.09 nM was determined. These data show the ability of piboserod to antagonize with high potency the enhancing properties of 5-HT on neurally-mediated contractions of isolated human bladder strips. Therefore, the 5-HT₄ receptor might represent an attractive pharmacological target for the treatment of overactive bladder.     

Uroselectivity in male dogs of silodosin (KMD-3213), a novel drug for the obstructive component of benign prostatic hyperplasia

AIMS: Our main aim was to compare the prostatic selectivity of silodosin with that of other alpha(1)-adrenoceptor (AR) antagonists. METHODS: We examined uroselectivities in two sets of experiments namely, in vitro and in vivo functional studies using male dogs. In the in vitro study, after evaluating the inhibitory effects of silodosin on noradrenaline (NA)-induced contractions in the isolated prostate and isolated carotid artery using the Magnus method, we calculated prostatic selectivity. In the in vivo study, we examined the effects of drugs on the hypogastric nerve stimulation (HNS)-induced increase in intraurethral pressure (IUP) and on blood pressure. The uroselectivity of silodosin was compared with those of tamsulosin and naftopidil. RESULTS: In vitro, all drugs antagonized NA-induced contraction in both prostate and carotid artery. The prostatic selectivity of silodosin (79.4) was much higher than those of tamsulosin (1.78), naftopidil (0.55), BMY 7378 (0.115), and prazosin (0.01). In vivo, intravenously (i.v.) administered silodosin dose-dependently inhibited the HNS-induced increase in IUP with much less hypotensive effect than either tamsulosin or naftopidil, the uroselectivity (ED(15)/ID(50)) of silodosin (237) being significantly higher than those of tamsulosin (1.21) and naftopidil (2.65). CONCLUSIONS: Our results clearly demonstrate that silodosin is a potent and highly selective alpha(1A)-AR antagonist. A selective alpha(1A)-AR antagonist such as silodosin may have good potential as a less-hypotensive drug for the treatment of urinary dysfunction in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients.