Oral misoprostol in the third stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravenous ergometrine, intramuscular oxytocin, and oral misoprostol in the control of postpartum hemorrhage. METHODS: Mean blood loss, rates of blood loss between 500 and 1000 ml, hematocrit fall greater than 10%, and need for additional oxytocic agents and nature and rates of adverse effects were assessed in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. RESULTS: All outcomes were similar in the 3 groups. The main adverse effects in the misoprostol group were temperatures higher than 99 degrees F, which normalized within 2 h and shivering, which was mild and self-limiting. CONCLUSIONS: Oral misoprostol is as effective as conventional oxytocic agents in preventing postpartum hemorrhage and can be recommended for use in low-resource settings.     

Benefits of cord blood collection in the prevention of post-partum hemorrhage: a cohort study

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of umbilical cord drainage through cord blood collection (CBC) for the prevention of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study based on data collected prospectively including all vaginal delivery of singletons pregnancies after 37 weeks of gestation between July 2011 and May 2013 at the Strasbourg Teaching Hospital. We performed a univariate comparison of PPH risk factors with χ² tests and then we built multivariate logistic regressions to predict PPH, severe PPH (>1000?cc), retained placenta over 30?min and manual removal of the placenta.

Results: A total of 7810 vaginal deliveries were analyzed, among which 1957 benefited from CBC (25%). In the CBC group, 71 PPH (3.6%) were observed versus 260 (4.4%) in the control group (p?=?0.12). In multivariate analysis, after adjustment on PPH risk factors, CBC revealed to be a protective factor of PPH: OR?=?0.69 (95% CI 0.50–0.97; p?=?0.03). CBC is neither a significant predictive factor of severe PPH, time to placental delivery nor rate of manual removal of the placenta.

Conclusions: In our study, CBC and thus umbilical cord drainage was a protective factor against PPH but it did reduce neither retained placenta nor the need for artificial placental delivery.     

Misoprostol and active management of the third stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare current practices for the active management of the third stage of labor (AMTSL) with the use of 600 mug of oral misoprostol. METHODS: An operations research study was designed to compare blood loss with current AMTSL practices and misoprostol use. RESULTS: Women in the misoprostol group were less likely to bleed 500 ml or more (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.56) compared with those in the current practices group. In the current practices group 73% women required interventions because of postpartum hemorrhage, compared with 11% in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: In situations where oxytocin and or ergometrine are not consistently and appropriately used during third stage of labor, misoprostol should be considered for inclusion in the AMTSL protocol.     

Misoprostol use during the third stage of labor.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the efficacy of misoprostol compared with placebo or other uterotonics in preventing maternal morbidity associated with the third stage of labor. METHODS: We identified, retrieved, evaluated, abstracted data, and assessed the quality of all published studies (from January 1996 to May 2002) which assessed misoprostol's efficacy in minimizing uterine blood loss during the third stage of labor. Seventeen studies included 28170 subjects; of these, approximately one-half received misoprostol with the remainder receiving either a placebo or another uterotonic agent. An estimate of the odds ratio (OR) and risk difference for dichotomous outcomes was calculated using a random- and fixed-effects model. Continuous outcomes were pooled using a variance-weighted average of within-study difference in means. RESULTS: In assessing studies comparing misoprostol with placebo, those who received oral misoprostol had a decreased risk of needing additional uterotonics (OR 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.46, 0.90). Compared with placebo, use of misoprostol was associated with an increased risk for shivering and pyrexia. In contrast, in studies comparing misoprostol with oxytocin, oxytocin was associated with significantly lower rates of postpartum hemorrhage, maternal shivering and pyrexia. In studies comparing misoprostol with Syntometrine, misoprostol was associated with higher rates of the need for additional uterotonic agent as well as shivering. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol was inferior to oxytocin and other uterotonics with regard to any of the third stage of labor outcomes assessed. However, when compared to placebo, misoprostol had a decreased risk of needing additional uterotonics. Thus, in less-developed countries where administration of parenteral uterotonic drugs may be problematic, misoprostol represents a reasonable agent for the management of the third stage of labor. Additional randomized clinical trials examining objective outcome measures (i.e. need for blood transfusion or 10% hemoglobin change) may further define benefits and risks of misoprostol use during the third stage of labor.     

Prospective randomized trial of oxytocin administration for active management of the third stage of labor

Objective

To determine the most efficient route and timing of oxytocin administration for active management of the third stage of labor.

Methods

A prospective randomized study was done at one center in Ankara, Turkey, between January and October 2010. Women with a singleton pregnancy (> 37 weeks) who had a live vaginal birth were randomly allocated to four groups: iv-A (intravenous oxytocin after delivery of the fetus), iv-B (when anterior shoulder seen), im-A (intramuscular oxytocin after delivery), and im-B (when anterior shoulder seen). Postpartum blood loss within the first hour, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and duration of the third stage were compared.

Results

A total of 600 eligible women were recruited; 150 were assigned to each group. Postpartum blood loss, prepartum and postpartum hemoglobin and hematocrit, and need for additional uterotonics were similar among groups (P > 0.05). The duration of the third stage of labor and changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly reduced in group iv-B (P < 0.05). Among women not exposed to oxytocin before delivery, postpartum blood loss was significantly lower in group iv-B (P = 0.019). Labor augmentation was related to significantly increased postpartum blood loss in all groups except iv-A.

Conclusion

Although postpartum blood loss was similar in all groups, early intravenous administration seemed to have beneficial effects.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01954186.     

Comparison of sublingual misoprostol, intravenous oxytocin, and intravenous methylergometrine in active management of the third stage of labor

Objective

To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of sublingual misoprostol, intravenous oxytocin, and intravenous methylergometrine in active management of the third stage of labor (AMTSL).

Methods

A double-blind randomized trial of 300 women with a healthy singleton pregnancy allocated into 4 groups to receive either: 400 µg or 600 µg of sublingual misoprostol, 5 IU of intravenous oxytocin, or 200 µg of intravenous methylergometrine. The primary outcome measure was blood loss in the third and fourth stage of labor; secondary measures were duration of the third stage of labor, changes in hemoglobin levels, and adverse effects.

Results

Patients who received 600 µg of misoprostol had the lowest blood loss (96.05 ± 21.1 mL), followed by 400 µg of misoprostol (126.24 ± 49.3 mL), oxytocin (154.7 ± 45.7 mL), and methylergometrine (223.4 ± 73.7 mL) (P < 0.01). Shortest mean duration of the third stage of labor (5.74 minutes) was with 600 µg of misoprostol, while methylergometrine had the longest (6.83 minutes) (P < 0.05). Pyrexia was observed in the misoprostol groups, and raised blood pressure in the methylergometrine group (P < 0.001). The 24-hour postpartum hemoglobin level was similar among the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Administration of 600 µg of sublingual misoprostol was more effective than 400 µg of misoprostol, intravenous oxytocin, and intravenous methylergometrine for AMTSL.     

Advance distribution of misoprostol for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in South Sudan

Objective

To determine if high uterotonic coverage can be achieved in South Sudan through a facility- and community-focused postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) prevention program.

Methods

The program was implemented from October 2012 to March 2013. At health facilities, active management of the third stage of labor (AMTSL) was emphasized. During prenatal care and home visits, misoprostol was distributed to pregnant women at approximately 32 weeks of pregnancy for the prevention of PPH at home births. Data on uterotonic coverage and other program outcomes were collected through facility registers, home visits, and postpartum interviews.

Results

In total, 533 home births and 394 facility-based births were reported. Misoprostol was distributed in advance to 787 (84.9%) pregnant women, of whom 652 (82.8%) received the drug during home visits. Among the women who delivered at home, 527 (98.9%) reported taking misoprostol. A uterotonic for PPH prevention was provided at 342 (86.8%) facility-based deliveries. Total uterotonic coverage was 93.7%. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

It is feasible to achieve high coverage of uterotonic use in a low-resource and postconflict setting with few skilled birth attendants through a combination of advance misoprostol distribution and AMTSL at facilities. Advance distribution through home visits was key to achieving high coverage of misoprostol use.     

Rectal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of 800 μg of rectal misoprostol compared with an intravenous infusion of 5 IU of oxytocin as prophylaxis against postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

Methods

A total of 514 women in labor were randomized into two groups (257 women in each). Within 1 minute of delivery of the anterior shoulder participants in group 1 received 800 μg of rectal misoprostol and 1 ampoule of normal saline in 5 mL lactated Ringer solution intravenously; group 2 received a rectal placebo tablet and 5 IU of oxytocin in 5 mL lactated Ringer solution intravenously.

Results

Both groups were comparable regarding the need for uterotonics, blood transfusion, and hematocrit drop of 10% or greater, 24 hours post partum (P = 0.54, P = 0.25, and P = 0.85, respectively). Fever was significantly higher among misoprostol patients (18.7% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Routine use of 800 μg of rectal misoprostol was effective in reducing blood loss after delivery. We recommend the regimen for low-resource, busy obstetric settings.     

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of misoprostol and routine uterotonics for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage

Objective

To assess the effects of 400-μg sublingual misoprostol plus routine uterotonics on postpartum hemorrhage.

Methods

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed. After delivery of the child, eligible women received routine uterotonics and were randomly allocated to receive 400-μg misoprostol or placebo sublingually. The primary outcome measure was blood loss of at least 500 mL within 1 hour of taking the trial tablets.

Results

In total, 672 women received misoprostol and 673 received placebo. The baseline data were similar for both groups. Misoprostol plus routine uterotonics reduced postpartum blood loss, but the effect was not significant for blood loss of at least 500 mL (relative risk [RR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.45) or blood loss of at least 1000 mL (RR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.15-1.66). Misoprostol also reduced the need for non-routine oxytocin, manual removal of the placenta, and hysterectomy, but these differences were not significant either. Misoprostol was associated with pyrexia and moderate/severe shivering. There was no death in either group.

Conclusion

Misoprostol plus routine uterotonics resulted in modest reductions of blood loss in the third stage of labor, but the effects did not reach statistical significance. Larger studies are recommended.     

Management of the third stage of labor

Management of the third stage of labor has been an issue of discussion, concern, and continued debate for the past two decades. Despite the many strategies employed and the divergent approaches to care and philosophies espoused, there has not been a significant, consistent reduction in the postpartum hemorrhage rates reported in industrialized countries in recent times. This article explores the strategies that have been and are currently being used in an effort to reduce the risk of postpartum hemorrhage.     

Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of misoprostol with PGE(2) for induction of labor by intracervical administration. METHODS: Eighty-six women with indications for labor induction at term were randomly assigned to two groups. Each woman received either 50 microg of misoprostol or 0.5 mg of prostaglandin E(2) intracervically. If labor was not initiated after 4 h, the same dose was repeated every 4 h to a maximum of 200 microg of misoprostol or 1.5 mg of PGE(2) until adequate labor was achieved. RESULTS: Forty-three women were allocated to the misoprostol group and 43 to the prostaglandin E(2) group. Misoprostol was more effective than PGE(2) in producing cervical changes (P<0.025). Delivery within 12 h after the first administration occurred more often in the misoprostol group than in the PGE(2) one (85% vs. 56%, P<0.05). Less patients in the misoprostol group required oxytocin augmentation than in the PGE(2) one (16.3% vs. 39.5%, P<0.05). Uterine tachysystole and hyperstimulation occurred more frequently in the misoprostol group (44.1%) than in the PGE(2) group (18.7%) (P<0.05). Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups including mode of delivery and neonatal or maternal adverse outcome. The interval from induction to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (480+/-172 min vs. 657+/-436 min, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with prostaglandin E(2), intracervical misoprostol is more effective in cervical ripening and labor induction at term. The higher frequency of uterine hypercontractility associated with the use of misoprostol did not increase the risk of adverse intrapartum and neonatal outcomes.     

Length of the third stage of labor at term pregnancies is shorter if placenta is located at fundus: prospective study

AIM: To investigate how the location of the placenta at term pregnancies affects the duration of the third stage of labor and to discuss the possible mechanisms affecting the duration of the third stage. We believe that this is the first prospective study comparing the duration of the third stage of labor according to placental location. METHODS: The placental implantation was determined as anterior (n = 78), posterior (n = 59), or fundal (n = 64) by ultrasound, in 201 women with singleton pregnancies. After delivery of the newborn, oxytocin infusion was routinely given. Duration of the third stage of labor was compared by anova. P < 0.05 was determined as significant. RESULTS: The duration of the third stage of labor was 10.36 +/- 5.94 min, 10.44 +/- 5.35 min, and 8.12 +/- 4.25 min with placentas located anteriorly, posteriorly, and fundal, respectively. The length of the third stage was significantly shorter in the fundal placenta group. CONCLUSION: In this study, the length of the third stage of labor was approximately 2 min shorter with placentas located at the fundus compared to the other two groups. The mechanism responsible for shorter duration may be the bipolar separation of fundal placentas in contrast to usual unipolar down-up separation of anterior or posterior placentas. Another contributing factor may be the use of oxytocin infusion for the management of the third stage, however this should be investigated by further studies by using real time ultrasonography.     

The clinical research into the application of multifunctional airbag abdominal pressure belt in midwifery and in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage

Objective: Explore the effect of the multifunctional airbag abdominal pressure belt on midwifery and on the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.

Methods: Select 363 natural delivery cases of hospitalized primiparae and divide them randomly into two groups. In the observation group, 182 primiparae used the multifunctional airbag abdominal pressure belt during the second and third stages of labor, whereas the control group of 181 did not use the belt. Delivery outcomes of the primiparae and their fetus were then observed.

Results: The average duration for the second stage of labor, from head emergence to delivery, placenta delivery and postpartum hemorrhage were all shorter in the observation group (p?p?>?0.05). No statistical difference was found in primipara signs and no fetal heart rate change of the primiparae under different internal pressures of the belt during the second stage of labor in the observation group (p?>?0.05).

Conclusion: By closely monitoring and appropriately adjusting the internal pressure of the belt, the multifunctional airbag abdominal pressure belt can speed up the second and third stages of labor, prevent postpartum hemorrhage and promote natural delivery.     

Placebo-controlled randomized comparison of vaginal with rectal misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage

AIM: To compare vaginally administered misoprostol to rectally administered misoprostol and placebo in a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. METHODS: One hundred and fifty women with singleton vaginal deliveries were randomized (50 women in each arm) to receive 400-microg misoprostol tablets (crushed and suspended in a microenema) intravaginally, or 400-microg misoprostol tablets rectally, or two placebo lactose tablets rectally. The medication was administered immediately after delivery of the placenta. Women with profuse hemorrhage and delayed placental separation (>30 min) were excluded. Our outcome measures were postpartum blood loss 1 h after administration, and change in hemoglobin and hematocrit values from baseline to postpartum day 1. Analysis of variance and chi-squared tests were used to compare the outcome variables between groups. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six women were available for analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar across the groups. The number of excluded subjects, the estimated blood loss, and the drop in hemoglobin and hematocrit values did not differ between the three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol administered vaginally or rectally at a dosage of 400 microg following placental separation was not effective for decreasing postpartum bleeding in women without excessive hemorrhage.     

Sublingual vs. vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sublingual with vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labor. METHODS: This double-blind clinical trial randomized 150 women to receive every 6 h 25 mug of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal placebo or 25 mug of vaginal misoprostol and sublingual placebo. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated. The significance level was 5%. RESULTS: Vaginal delivery rates were 57% in the sublingual group and 69% in the vaginal group (RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.1). There were 11 cases of fetal distress in the sublingual group and 4 cases in the vaginal group (RR, 2.7; 95% CI, 0.9-8.2). There were no significant differences in the number of doses needed, interval between first dose and delivery, incidence of contractility disturbances, or neonatal results. CONCLUSION: The administration of misoprostol 25 mug by the sublingual route was neither more effective nor safer than the same dose administered vaginally.