Immune tolerance induction in haemophiliacs with inhibitor to FVIII: high- or low-dose programme

Summary. In 1993–94, 15 high responders were treated in our centre according to the Malmo protocol which was modified as follows: serial plasmapheresis was performed instead of extracorporeal adsorbtion to protein A for reducing inhibitor levels and, after the bolus dose to neutralize the inhibitor, factor VIII concentrate was administered by a continuous infusion. Thus, this regimen included continuous infusion of factor VIII(FVIII) for 1–4 weeks, iv cyclophosphamide for 2 days and orally for 8–10 days, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) from the fourth day for 5 days. All patients had been qualified for the treatment when the antibody level was < 15 BU mL⁻¹. Tolerance was induced in 10 patients (66.6% very good and good results). The treatment failed in five cases in which, due to a high inhibitor level, it was not possible to maintain a measurable factor VIII:C concentration throughout the whole period of infusion. We compared these results with results of our low-dose regimen: 25 IU FVIII kg⁻¹ b.w. twice a week (1985–89, 11 high responders). The modified Malmo Protocol is much shorter than the low-dose programme and this is a method of first choice in patients undergoing surgery in the near future.     

Frequency of inhibitor development in severe haemophilia A children treated with cryoprecipitate and low-dose immune tolerance induction.

The frequency of factor VIII inhibitor development was evaluated in a hundred severe haemophilia A patients < 18 years of age (mean 10.4 +/- 5.1 years); 25 were previously untreated patients (PUPs), with a mean age of 11.2 +/- 2.9 months. All were followed up for 3 years from December 1996. Immune tolerance (IT) was induced with low-dose factor VIII (FVIII); 25-50 IU kg(-1) every other day for the 10 haemophiliacs who developed persistent inhibitors. The incidence of inhibitors for PUPs was 3/25 (12%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0. 7-24.7%) and were detected after 4, 15 and 20 exposure days (mean 13 +/- 8.2 days; 95% CI, 3.7-22.2%). Children with maximum inhibitor levels of > 40 Bethesda units (BU) per mL (n=4) received IT therapy as 25 U kg(-1) FVIII in the form of cryoprecipitate every other day for 1-4 months (mean 2.4 +/- 1.6 months; 95% CI, 0.8-3.9%), which was successful in all of them. FVIII (50 U kg(-1)) was given every other day for six patients with maximum inhibitor level > 40 BU mL(-1) for 3-9 months (mean 5.4 +/- 3.2 months; 95% CI, 2.9 -7.9%) with success in 4/6 (66.6%; 95% CI, 28.8-104.3%). Patients who showed a good IT response had an inhibitor level < or = 30 BU mL(-1), were < or = 9 years of age at inhibitor development with few exposure days to FVIII and had an early immune tolerance. In conclusion, inhibitor development in severe haemophilia A children exclusively treated with cryoprecipitate is low. Early low-dose IT induction for high responders may be achieved successfully if inhibitor level is < or = 50 BU mL(-1).     

Postoperative paraneoplastic factor VIII auto‐antibodies in patients with solid tumours

Summary. Paraneoplastic FVIII antibodies may occur concurrent with the diagnosis or at various times after diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Between 2002 and 2009, we observed two patients with acquired haemophilia A due to an FVIII auto‐antibody, which appeared 4 and 5 months after uncomplicated cancer surgery. We aimed to evaluate if such an association of cancer surgery and FVIII antibody formation has been observed previously. We retrieved all published case reports of cancer‐associated FVIII auto‐antibodies from PubMed for the period 1950–2010. The search in the literature revealed 13 patients in whom a FVIII inhibitor developed after uncomplicated surgery for cancer and a bleeding‐free time interval of up to 6 months; 11/15 patients had abdominal cancers (five colon cancer, four pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer and choledochus carcinoma one each). The median time period between surgery and antibody detection was 3 months (1 week–6 months). In most cases, the antibody titre was low (median: 14 BU mL^?1, range: 1.7–64 BU mL^?1). Immunosuppressive treatment was successful in most of the cases – nine of the treated patients reached a sustained CR of the antibody after a median time of 3 months. Postoperative paraneoplastic FVIII inhibitors may be regarded as a special, not yet recognized subgroup of acquired FVIII antibodies. They share some characteristics with postpartum FVIII inhibitors with regard to the latency period between the triggering event and the appearance of the antibody, and between the usually low antibody titres and their good response to immunosuppressive treatment.     

Occurrence of inhibitors in previously untreated or minimally treated patients with haemophilia A after exposure to a plasma-derived solvent-detergent factor VIII concentrate

A solvent-detergent virus-inactivated plasma-derived FVIII concentrate (SD-pdFVIII) has been employed for treatment of Italian patients with haemophilia A for 15 years. This product is a non-monoclonally purified, high purity FVIII concentrate, containing large amounts of von Willebrand factor (VWF). A retrospective survey was carried out in Italy in order to evaluate the immunogenicity of SD-pdFVIII in previously untreated patients (PUPs) or in minimally treated patients (MTPs), i.e. previously exposed for up to 5 days only to other plasma-derived concentrates. The survey included 99 patients with ages ranging from 6 to 64 years (median=21.3) of whom 31 PUPs and 68 MTPs, the latter with a median of four exposure days (EDs; range 1-5) to other plasma products. Surveyed patients had been exposed to SD-pdFVIII for a median of 83 EDs (range 21-1580). Seven patients (three PUPs and four MTPs), all with severe haemophilia, had developed inhibitors [7.1%, 95%; confidence interval: 3-14%] after a median of 11 EDs (range 4-22). Of them, two were low responders (相似文献   

Continuous infusion of porcine factor VIII in the management of patients with factor VIII inhibitors

The effectiveness of continuous infusion porcine factor VIII (PFVIII) has been evaluated in the treatment of 7 consecutive patients with factor VIII(FVIII) inhibitors. Two patients had hemophilia A and five were nonhemophiliacs with acquired FVIII inhibitors. The median pretreatment anti-porcine FVIII titre was 0.2 (range: 0–15.0) Bethesda units (BU), and the anti-human FVIII titer was 12.0 BU (range: 2.4–50.0). All patients presented with major bleeding. Patients were given a bolus dose of PFVIII followed by continuous infusion. Six patients also received immunosuppressive therapy. Therapeutic FVIII levels (>0.5 U/ml) were achieved in 6 of 7 patients at a median time of 12.5 hr, and then maintained with continuous infusion PFVIII. Six patients were treated for more than 7 days, and in four of these there was a decline in FVIII recovery between days 7 to 11, presumably related to a rising antibody response to PFVIII. These four patients were plasmapheresed and the three patients with autoantibodies recovered therapeutic FVIII levels but this did not occur in the patient with hemophilia. Thrombocytopenia developed in 4 patients at days 18 to 24, with the platelet count falling to 11 to 87 × 10⁹/L, and the PFVIII was discontinued in 3 patients. All patients recovered from the acute bleeding events. With prolonged immunosuppressive therapy, the FVIII inhibitor disappeared in all patients with autoantibodies and there have been no relapses after a median follow-up period of 581 days. This study demonstrates that continuous infusion PFVIII is an effective therapy for patients with FVIII inhibitors, but that prolonged treatment is associated with the development of inhibitors to porcine FVIII and severe thrombocytopenia, which readily corrects with discontinuation of PFVIII. Am. J. Hematol. 56:112–118, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Antibodies to factor VIII in plasma of patients with hemophilia A and normal subjects

 Non-neutralizing factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (FVIII-Ab) in hemophilia A may be associated with an abnormal clinical response to FVIII concentrates. Patients with FVIII inhibitors may develop noncoagulation FVIII-Ab after the induction of immunotolerance. Natural FVIII-Ab may be detected in the plasma of some healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of FVIII-Ab in the plasma of 53 normal blood donors and 124 patients with hemophilia A (18 patients had a previous history of FVIII inhibitor, but only 12 had inhibitor at the moment this study was performed). FVIIII inhibitor was measured using the Bethesda method. FVIII-Ab were analyzed by a specific ELISA assay using purified FVIII from a monoclonal concentrate and a standard plasma containing 26 Bethesda units (BU) of FVIII inhibitor. Purified FVIII was used to coat wells of a microtiter plate and was incubated with dilutions of plasma to be tested. Bound human IgG FVIII-Ab were detected by incubation with polyclonal sheep anti.human IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate, and the OD₄₀₅ was quantitated. A linear fit was obtained (by plotting FVIII-Ab positivity [OD 405nm] versus BU titer) when serial dilutions of this standard inhibitor plasma, containing titers of 0.5 BU or higher, were used. Four different levels of FVIII-Ab positivity [OD 405nm] were distinguished in this assay: Negative levels (–) were obtained with dilutions of the standard inhibitor containing <0.5 BU. Mild levels (+) were obtained with dilutions of 0.5–5 BU. Moderate levels (++) were obtained for dilutions ranging from 5–25 BU. Maximum positivity (+++) was obtained for dilutions of titers > 25 BU. FVIII-Ab positivity was detected in eight of the normal subjects (15%): three were found to be moderately positive (++) and five mildly positive (+). No inhibitory activity was detectable when whole plasma was used. All the hemophilic patients with a presence of FVIII inhibitor at the time of the study were found to be positive for FVIII-Ab. In addition, the level of positivity correlated with the corresponding BU. Four of the six patients who had a history of inhibitor were negative and two positive. Twenty additional patients (16.12%) in whom no inhibitory activity was detected were found to be positive for FVIII-Ab: 16 + and four ++. The mean age of patients with FVIII-Ab positivity was significantly higher than that of patients of the FVIII-Ab negative group (p<0.005). In conclusion, FVIII-Ab positivity in patients with hemophilia A was 17.7% higher than the level of positivity detected by an inhibitory assay. We propose that this method for FVIII-Ab analysis could be used for patients with hemophilia A, at least to complement the functional inhibitor assay. FVIII recovery or half-life should be assessed in patients who test positive for FVIII-Ab and who show no evidence of inhibitor. Received: 31 July 1995 / Accepted: 25 January 1996     

A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (recombinate): safety, efficacy, and inhibitor risk in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A. The Recombinate Study Group

In July 1990, the Recombinate Study Group initiated a prospective, open- labeled investigation of recombinant factor VIII (r-FVIII) to assess its safety and efficacy and to characterize the natural history of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A. All study subjects have severe FVIII deficiency (baseline FVIII level < or = 2% of normal) and no history of blood product exposure before study entry. Following the first r-FVIII infusion, plasma was screened for inhibitors once every 3 months, and plasma recovery of r-FVIII at 30 minutes and 24 hours postinfusion was assayed at least once every 6 months. As of May 1993, 73 of 79 patients originally enrolled in the trial continue to participate. The median number of r-FVIII exposure-days for the 71 subjects who have received at least one r-FVIII infusion is 11. A total of 1,785 infusions have been administered to treat 810 bleeding events. Ninety-two percent of bleeding events responded as anticipated to one or two infusions. Two, nonrecurring, acute adverse reactions occurred coincident with r-FVIII infusion, one of which was unrelated and the other, possibly related to the infusion. Seventeen (23.9%) subjects have developed inhibitors: five with peak titers more than 10 Bethesda units (BU) and 12 with peak titers < or = 10 BU (range, 0.5 to 10). Survival analysis showed that the probability of remaining inhibitor-free in this group of patients with severe hemophilia A is 88.4% after 8, 73.6% after 10, and 61.6% after 25 r-FVIII exposure-days. Inhibitors disappeared in five (29.4%) subjects on retesting 2 to 16 months after the last positive inhibitor assay. r-FVIII is safe and effective in the treatment of hemophilia A- related bleeding. To date, the inhibitor risk associated with its use is comparable to that in patients treated with plasma-derived concentrates. The majority of inhibitors identified are low in titer and do not preclude continued on-demand therapy with r-FVIII.     

Successful surgical haemostasis in patients with von Willebrand disease with Koate®DVI

Summary. This report describes our experience with Koate^®DVI, a factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) for surgery in patients with von Willebrand’s disease (VWD). Twenty‐one patients underwent 26 procedures, 10 of which were major and 16 were minor. The median age was 27 years (3–55) and the mean weight was 52 kg (16–88). Among the ten patients (type 2–5; type 3–5) who underwent major procedures, the pre‐operative dose was 35 IU kg^?1 of FVIII followed by 10–20 IU kg^?1 once daily depending on FVIII:C levels. The mean total dose of FVIII used per procedures was 106 IU kg^?1 (30–190) over a mean duration of 7 days (3–11). In this group, pre‐infusion FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF: ristocetin cofactor (RCoF) level that were 19.5% (1–64), 20 U dL^?1 (0–96) and 12% (0–66) increased to 72% (54–198), 131 U dL^?1 (68–206) and 68% (27–108) postinfusion, respectively. Sixteen minor procedures were performed in 11 patients (type 1–3, type 2–6, type 3–2). The preparative dose of FVIII was 10–20 IU kg^?1. The average duration of factor support was 2 days (1–3) for a mean total dose of 23 IU kg^?1 (9–60). The pre‐infusion levels of FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:ristocetin cofactor (RCo) which were 31% (22–64), 25.5 U dL^?1 (0–63) and 21% (0–76), respectively, increased to 76% (27–111), 73 U dL^?1 (30–137) and 45% (2–106) postinfusion. Whereas surgical haemostasis was achieved in all patients, minor postoperative bleeding occurred after one procedure in each group. Both were controlled with additional doses of factor replacement. We conclude that Koate^®DVI in modest doses provide adequate haemostasis for surgery in patients with VWD.     

Decline of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors during long-term treatment with NovoSeven.

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (NovoSeveng) is used to treat bleeding episodes in hemophilia A and B patients with inhibitor antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX. rFVIIIa has been studied in home treatment of mild-to-moderate joint, muscle, and mucocutaneous bleeds to assess safety and efficacy. Treatment with other factor concentrates was allowed according to treating physician's judgment. Blood samples were drawn before study start and after 6 and 12 months. It has thus been possible to follow the inhibitor titres during this period. Analyses of 53 patients (49 hemophilia A, four hemophilia B) showed inhibitor levels up to 1,208 BU/ml before study start. Based on the first analysis, hemophilia A patients were divided into high responders (> 5 BU/ml; 28 patients), low responders (> 1 and < 5 BU/ml; 15 patients) and very low responders (< or = 1 BU/ml; six patients). In high responders receiving rFVIIa as only treatment, FVIII inhibitor titre decreased to one-third of the initial level. For high responders receiving other factor treatments such as FVIII or prothrombin complex concentrates, inhibitor titre remained unchanged. Titres for low responders and very low responders remained unchanged independent of treatment. Thus, when rFVIIa is used as the only coagulation factor to treat hemophilia A/B high-responder inhibitor patients, inhibitor level declines significantly.     

Relationships between factor VIII:Ag and factor VIII in recombinant and plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates

A variety of plasma-derived (pd) and recombinant (r) factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates are used to prevent and treat bleeding in severe hemophilia A patients. A significant side effect of FVIII replacement is the development of FVIII neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) in up to 30% of patients receiving FVIII concentrates. The FVIII protein content (FVIII:Ag) per unit of FVIII:C in FVIII concentrates, and how effectively the FVIII:Ag in FVIII concentrates binds to von Willebrand factor (VWF) may provide information relevant for the survival of FVIII:C in vivo and for estimating the risk for inhibitor development. The FVIII:Ag content of nine r-FVIII and nine pd-FVIII concentrates were quantified in this study using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) platforms. The two ELISA platforms were based on the use of a monoclonal anti-(FVIII light chain)-IgG and polyclonal anti-FVIII antibodies as capture antibodies and both ELISAs were equally able to detect > or =0.005 IU of FVIII:Ag. Measured in international units, the r-FVIII concentrates contained significantly higher FVIII:Ag per unit of FVIII:C than the pd-FVIII concentrates. The VWF-binding profiles of the r-FVIII and pd-FVIII concentrates were also determined by gel filtration chromatography. Unlike the plasma-derived products, the r-FVIII concentrates invariably contained a fraction of FVIII:Ag molecules (approximately 20%) which was unable to associate with VWF. Given that VWF regulates both factor VIII proteolysis and survival of FVIII:Ag in vivo, the fraction of FVIII:Ag unable to bind to VWF may have a reduced survival and be more susceptible to proteolytic degradation in vivo. The extent to which the fractions of FVIII:Ag in concentrates able and unable to bind to VWF contribute to inhibitor development in severe FVIII-deficient patients is unknown.     

A review of immune tolerance induction with Haemate® P in haemophilia A

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) has been shown to successfully eliminate factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. We performed a literature search to identify reports from January 1980 to October 2012 on the use of the plasma‐derived, von Willebrand factor (VWF)‐containing FVIII concentrate Haemate^® P/Humate‐P^® in the setting of ITI. Six reports were identified that specifically evaluated the use of Haemate^® P/Humate‐P^® including 32 children and 9 adults. Dosing regimens ranged from 20 IU kg⁻¹ every 2–3 days in patients with low‐responding (LR; n = 5) inhibitors to 300 IU kg⁻¹ day⁻¹ in patients with high‐responding (HR; n = 36) inhibitors. Complete success was achieved in all five LR patients, in all three HR patients with good prognostic factors (age ≤7 years, pre‐ITI inhibitor titre <10 BU, historical inhibitor titre <200 BU, time between inhibitor detection and ITI start <2 years), and in 24 of 33 (73%) HR patients with poor prognostic factors. The time to complete success was 0.5–4 months in good‐prognosis patients and 0.5–42 months in poor‐prognosis patients. Few adverse events were observed during ITI, and no cases of inhibitor relapse were reported with follow‐up periods of up to 12 years. On the basis of this retrospective review of a diverse range of studies and case reports, we conclude that Haemate^® P/Humate‐P^® for ITI in patients with inhibitors is effective and produces high rates of ITI success.     

New early prophylaxis regimen that avoids immunological danger signals can reduce FVIII inhibitor development

Summary. The most problematic complication of haemophilia A treatment is the development of inhibitors to FVIII. The highest risk of developing inhibitors is during the first 20 exposure days (EDs). If the patient can be brought through this high risk period without inhibitor development, the subsequent risk is low. Therefore, as a pilot project, we developed a prophylaxis regimen for the first 20–50 EDs specifically designed to induce tolerance to the administered FVIII and to minimize inhibitor development by avoiding immunological danger signals. Twenty‐six consecutive previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A were treated with the new prophylaxis regimen and the incidence of inhibitor development in this group was compared with that in a historical control group of 30 consecutive PUPs treated with a standard joint protection prophylaxis regimen (40–50 IU kg^?1, three times a week). There were no significant differences between the study and control groups in patient‐related inhibitor risk factors such as ethnicity (all Caucasian), severity of haemophilia (all <1% FVIII), severity of FVIII gene mutation (P < 0.0006) nor in some treatment‐related factors such as product type, age at first exposure, vaccination regimen or the need for surgery. 14 of 30 subjects given standard prophylaxis but only one of the 26 subjects given the new regimen developed an inhibitor (P = 0.0003, odds ratio 0.048, 95% CI: 0.001–0.372). Our results indicate that minimizing danger signals during the first 20 EDs with FVIII may reduce the risk of inhibitor formation. These results should be confirmed in a larger prospective clinical study.     

Immunogenetics of factor VIII inhibitor development

Objective: Progressive destruction of joints resulting from recurrent intra-articular haemorrhage represents the major morbidity resulting from haemophilia A or B. In addition to systemic clotting factor replacement, therapies localized to haemophilic joints may provide adjunctive protection. In a factor VIII^-/- mice model, we investigated if extra-vascular delivery of recombinant human clotting factor VIII (rhFVIII) via intra-articular (IA) injection can prevent bleeding-induced joint damage, and also examined the possibility that IA delivery of FVIII carries greater risk of developing anti-rhFVIII inhibitor antibody. Methods: FVIII^-/- mice received rhFVIII by inserting a 30.5 G needle into the left knee joint, along with a range doses of FVIII(100, 25 and 5 IU kg⁻¹) in 5 μL, normal saline as the control. Comparison group received the same needle injury and intravenous (IV) rhFVIII (100, 25 and 5 IU kg⁻¹). 14 days after injury, both knee joints were collected for histological examination. To exclude the possibility that IA clotting factor was entering into circulation, mice received 100 IU kg⁻¹ rhFVIII IA, and FVIII activity was measured by aPTT. To see if IA rhFVIII delivery can carry greater risk of developing anti-FVIII antibody, mice were treated with a total dose of 300 IU kg⁻¹ rhFVIII over 10 days, either by IA or IV. 14 days after exposure, anti-FVIII was detected. After induction of anti-FVIII antibody by IV rhFVIII, mice were subjected either to needle puncture under coverage of bypassing agent (FEIBA) 100 IU kg⁻¹ or 100 IU kg⁻¹ IV rhFVIII, or needle puncture with 25 IU kg⁻¹ rhFVIII. Control mice received needle puncture with normal saline. Two weeks later, knee joints were collected for histological examination. Summary: Mice receiving only saline at the time of needle puncture developed synovitis (mean score 5.0 ± 0.5). Mice treated with 25 IU kg⁻¹ IA rhFVIII developed better protection than mice treated with 100 IU kg⁻¹ IV rhFVIII (lower pathology score for IA, 0.733 ± 0.278 vs. IV 2.57 ± 1.70) and even better protection was achieved by the dose of 100IU IU kg⁻¹ IA (Pathology score of 0.25 ± 0.31). IA injection of 100 IU kg⁻¹ rhFVIII did not lead to increased circulating FVIII activity at any time point up to 48 h. In IV-treated mice, 100% of mice developed anti-FVIII antibody (8.06BU), while only 50% of mice developed anti-FVIII inhibitor at the lowest detection limit (0.61BU). In the presence of inhibitory antibody, only 46% of mice receiving IV FVIII survived the needle injury, 58% with FEIBA and 100% of mice survived with 25 IU kg⁻¹ FVIII IA injection. In the saline-injected control mice, needle injury led to a mean pathology score of 6.8. Neither IV FVIII nor FEIBA provided effective protection, with pathology scores of 6.3 and 5.4, respectively. Surprisingly, 25 IU kg⁻¹ IA rhFVIII produced a pathology score of only 1.7. Conclusion: Extravascular rhFVIII in the joint space can contribute protection against bleeding-induced joint damage. Intra-articular rhFVIII delivery did not induce greater risk of inhibitory antibody formation in FVIII knockout mice than circulating factor VIIII challenge; in fact, a lower incidence was observed. In the presence of anti-FVIII inhibitory antibodies, IA delivery of FVIII still can offer protection from bleeding-induced joint damage.     

Inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: a prospective long-term follow-up comparing plasma-derived and recombinant products

In order to assess inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe (factor VIII [FVIII]<1%) and moderate (FVIII 1 to 5%) hemophilia A, a prospective study was initiated in 1976. During the 23-year study period, 72 hemophiliacs were frequently exposed prophylactically or on demand to plasma-derived (pd) (n = 51) or recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) (n = 21) concentrates (median 270 exposure days [ED]). Inhibitor testing was performed before the first exposure and at regular intervals thereafter. Of the 72 hemophilia A patients, 22 (32%) developed an inhibitor after 15 ED in median (range 4 to 195); 17 (77%) were high responders (>5 Bethesda Units [BU]), and the remaining 5 patients (23%) were low responders (>0.6 to 5 BU). The severely affected patients (n = 46) showed a significantly higher frequency of inhibitor formation (43%) than did the moderate ones (8%). Comparing the severely affected patients receiving pd products exclusively (n = 35) with those treated with recombinant concentrate (n = 11), 37% of the pd group developed a high-titer inhibitor (>5 BU, median 290 ED in noninhibitor patients) and 36% of the recombinant group (median 49 ED in the noninhibitor patients). However, the exposure status of the recombinant noninhibitor patients is rather low and therefore remains a high risk of developing further inhibitors in the future. The mutation type profile revealed no difference between the pd- and the recombinant-treated patients.     

von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate (Humate‐P) for management of elective surgery in adults and children with von Willebrand disease

Summary. von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Treatment guidelines recommend the use of von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrate for VWD patients with type 2 or 3 VWD undergoing surgery, and type 1 patients undergoing surgery who are unresponsive, or for whom desmopressin acetate is contraindicated. This prospective, open‐label, multinational study evaluated the safety, efficacy and optimal dosing of a VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate‐P) in subjects with VWD undergoing elective surgery. Dosing was based on VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) and FVIII pharmacokinetic assessments performed before surgery. Pharmacokinetic assessments were completed in 33 adults and 9 children. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed on a 4‐point scale (excellent, good, moderate/poor or none). Overall effective haemostasis was achieved in 32/35 subjects. Median terminal VWF:RCo half‐life was 11.7 h, and median incremental in vivo recovery was 2.4 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1 infused. Major haemorrhage occurred after surgery in 3/35 cases despite achieving target VWF and FVIII levels. Median VWF/FVIII concentrate loading doses ranged from 42.6 IU VWF:RCo kg^?1 (oral surgery) to 61.2 IU VWF:RCo kg^?1 (major surgery), with a median of 10 (range, 2–55) doses administered per subject. Adverse events considered possibly treatment‐related (n = 6) were generally mild and of short duration. The results indicate that this VWF/FVIII concentrate is safe and effective in the prevention of excessive bleeding during and after surgery in individuals with VWD.     

Immune tolerance induction in the treatment of paediatric haemophilia A patients with factor VIII inhibitors

The development of an inhibitor to transfused factor VIII (FVIII) is a serious treatment-related problem in haemophiliac children. The management of patients with high titre FVIII inhibitors is difficult, and immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only method available for the eradication of these inhibitors. The results of the ITI regimen used at the Children's Hospital of Michigan Haemophilia Treatment Center are described and discussed. ITI was attempted in 14 children with severe haemophilia A (13 high responders, one low responder), with daily doses of FVIII alone. FVIII dosage was chosen according to the patient's historical peak inhibitor titre. ITI included three phases; induction phase, dose reduction phase and maintenance phase. During the first phase, the starting dose was 50 or 100 U kg-1 d-1; during the second phase the FVIII dosage was reduced gradually to 25 U kg-1 every other day according to the inhibitor titre, FVIII recovery and/or half-life study. In the third (maintenance) phase, the children received either prophylactic therapy or episodic therapy for 12 months. The inhibitor elimination was defined as the time taken to achieve a negative inhibitor assay with no anamnestic response and normal FVIII recovery and/or normal half-life. Immune tolerance was achieved in 11 of 14 patients (79%) patients within a median time of 6 months; two children are still on therapy, three failed ITI. We observed either failure or prolongation of immune tolerance if the historical peak titre or the maximum titre during ITI was >200 BU. The success rate of our low dose ITI regimen is not different from that reported by other investigators and the inhibitor elimination time is similar to some of the studies reported previously.     

Native plasma‐derived FVIII/VWF complex has lower sensitivity to FVIII inhibitors than the combination of isolated FVIII and VWF proteins. Impact on Bethesda assay titration of FVIII inhibitors

Sensitivity to FVIII inhibitors of the native plasma‐derived (pd) FVIII/VWF complex vs. the complexes formed after exogenous FVIII infusion in the haemophilic patient has not been thoroughly studied. The role of VWF in the interaction of FVIII with inhibitors was studied in vitro using different combinations of VWF and FVIII concentrates. Normal plasma, pdFVIII/VWF and isolated FVIII (recombinant FVIII, B‐domain deleted and pdFVIII) were used. Titre (BU) was kinetically determined (up to 2 h) in serial dilutions of inhibitor IgG (purified from a pool of plasmas with inhibitors) mixed with VWF and then incubated with the different FVIII. Inhibitor was also added to previously mixed VWF+FVIII. Residual FVIII:C was determined. TGA assays were performed with FVIII‐deficient plasma spiked with the FVIII‐VWF mixtures with/without an ESH‐8 antibody. Inhibitor titres for plasma and pdFVIII/VWF were comparable at all time points. Titres for all concentrates of isolated FVIII were significantly higher than those for plasma or pdFVIII/VWF (1.4–1.9 fold) even after preincubation with VWF. At t = 0 h, titres for plasma or pdFVIII/VWF were unquantifiable, but were detectable for isolated FVIII (0.6–1.6 BU). In contrast to pdFVIII/VWF, the decrease in thrombin generation parameters by isolated FVIII in the presence of ESH‐8 was significant (P < 0.01) even when previously combined with VWF. In conclusion, VWF protection against FVIII inhibitor activity might be higher with native pdFVIII/VWF complex than with the corresponding compound formed from the isolated proteins. Bethesda assay titration using different FVIII concentrates would be advisable to guide the treatment of inhibitor patients.     

Immune tolerance induction with a high purity von Willebrand factor/VIII complex concentrate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors at high risk of a poor response

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is effective in approximately 70% of haemophilia patients with inhibitors. Poor prognostic factors are age >6 years, ITI started >1 year from inhibitor development, inhibitor peaks >200 BU, inhibitor titre >10 BU when ITI is started and previously failed ITI. The objective of this study was to identify the effectiveness in ITI of a high purity von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) complex concentrate in inhibitor patients at high risk of failure. Patients with severe or moderate haemophilia A and high responding inhibitors who had at least one poor prognostic factor for ITI failure were prospectively followed-up. Success was defined by undetectable inhibitor, recovery and half life >66% of expected values. ITI dose regimens were chosen by each haemophilia centre. Seventeen haemophiliacs (16 severe, one moderate), aged 4-54 years (median 23) were followed-up for 6-71 months. Poor prognostic factors were delayed-onset ITI (n = 16), age >6 years (n = 16), previously failed ITI (n = 4), inhibitor peak >200 BU (n = 2) and inhibitor >10 BU when ITI was started (n = 4). Complete success was obtained in nine patients (53%) after 4-30 months of treatment (median 24), including two of four patients who had previously failed ITI. Seven patients achieved a partial success, with sustained low inhibitor titres (median 1.5 BU, range 1.1-2.8) but abnormal recovery and/or half-life, while the remaining patient withdrew ITI after 12 months when the inhibitor titer was still 70 BU. These findings suggest that high purity VWF/FVIII complex concentrates are effective in ITI, even in patients at high risk of failure.     

Immune tolerance therapy in paediatric haemophiliacs with factor VIII inhibitors: 14 years follow-up

We report our clinical experience in the immune tolerance (IT) therapy of 21 paediatric haemophiliacs with FVIII inhibitor: high responders (16HR) received initially FVIII twice daily at a dosage of 50–300 U/kg/day, 11/16 received a concomitant treatment with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (100–200 U/kg/day). Low responders (five LR) received 20–100 FVIII U/kg every second or third day. Inhibitor elimination was achieved in 19/21 patients in a median time of 4 months in HR and 1.5 months in LR. The outcome and length of time needed to induce IT was significantly correlated with FVIII exposure between the first inhibitor detection and onset of IT therapy and to interruption of IT therapy. For a rapid elimination of FVIII inhibitors it is important to start continuous administration of high-dose FVIII (≥ 100 FVIII U/kg/day) before repeated exposure to FVIII, in order to prevent rebooster effects, prolongation of elimination time, and to reduce expense.