Constitutive activity and ligand selectivity of human, guinea pig, rat, and canine histamine H2 receptors

Previous studies revealed pharmacological differences between human and guinea pig histamine H(2) receptors (H(2)Rs) with respect to the interaction with guanidine-type agonists. Because H(2)R species variants are structurally very similar, comparative studies are suited to relate different properties of H(2)R species isoforms to few molecular determinants. Therefore, we systematically compared H(2)Rs of human (h), guinea pig (gp), rat (r), and canine (c). Fusion proteins of hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rH(2)R, and cH(2)R, respectively, and the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS), were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. In the membrane steady-state GTPase activity assay, cH(2)R-G(salphaS) but neither gpH(2)R-G(salphaS) nor rH(2)R-G(salphaS) showed the hallmarks of increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), i.e., increased efficacies of partial agonists, increased potencies of agonists with the extent of potency increase being correlated with the corresponding efficacies at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), increased inverse agonist efficacies, and decreased potencies of antagonists. Furthermore, in membranes expressing nonfused H(2)Rs without or together with mammalian G(salphaS) or H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the highest basal and GTP-dependent increases in adenylyl cyclase activity were observed for cH(2)R. An example of ligand selectivity is given by metiamide, acting as an inverse agonist at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), and rH(2)R-G(salphaS) in the GTPase assay in contrast to being a weak partial agonist with decreased potency at cH(2)R-G(salphaS). In conclusion, the cH(2)R exhibits increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R, and there is evidence for ligand-specific conformations in H(2)R species isoforms.     

Mutations of Cys-17 and Ala-271 in the human histamine H2 receptor determine the species selectivity of guanidine-type agonists and increase constitutive activity

In a steady-state GTPase activity assay, N-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl)]guanidines and N(G)-acylated derivatives are more potent and efficacious at fusion proteins of guinea pig (gpH(2)R-G(salphaS)) than human (hH(2)R-G(salphaS)) histamine H(2) receptor, coupled to the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS). Whereas Ala-271 (hH(2)R) and Asp-271 (gpH(2)R) in transmembrane domain 7 were identified to determine the potency differences of guanidine-type agonists, the molecular basis for the efficacy differences remains to be elucidated. A homology model of the gpH(2)R suggested that an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 stabilizes an active receptor conformation of the gpH(2)R. In the present study, we generated a mutant hH(2)R-G(salphaS) with Cys-17--> Tyr-17/Ala-271--> Asp-271 exchanges (hH(2)R-->gpH(2)R) that exhibited an enhanced level of constitutive GTPase activity and adenylyl cyclase activity compared with wild-type hH(2)R-G(salphaS) and gpH(2)R-G(salphaS). Potencies and efficacies of guanidines and N(G)-acylguanidines were increased at this mutant receptor compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), but they were still lower than at gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), suggesting that aside from Tyr-17 and Asp-271 additional amino acids contribute to the distinct pharmacological profiles of both species isoforms. Another hH(2)R-G(salphaS) mutant with a Cys-17--> Tyr-17 exchange showed inefficient coupling to G(salphaS) as revealed by reduced agonist-stimulated GTPase and basal adenylyl cyclase activities. Collectively, our present pharmacological study confirms the existence of an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 favoring the stabilization of an active receptor conformation. Distinct potencies and efficacies of agonists and inverse agonists further support the concept of ligand-specific conformations in wild-type and mutant H(2)R-G(salphaS) fusion proteins.     

Differential efficacies of somatostatin receptor agonists for G-protein activation and desensitization of somatostatin receptor subtype 4-mediated responses

Both the histamine H1-receptor (H1R) and H2-receptor (H2R) exhibit pronounced species selectivity in their pharmacological properties; i.e., bulky agonists possess higher potencies and efficacies at guinea pig (gp) than at the corresponding human (h) receptor isoforms. In this study, we examined the effects of NG-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines substituted with a single phenyl or cyclohexyl substituent on H1R and H2R species isoforms expressed in Sf9 insect cells. N1-(3-Cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N2-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57) turned out to be the most potent hH2R agonist identified so far (EC50 of 23 nM in the GTPase assay at the hH2R-Gsalpha fusion protein expressed in Sf9 insect cells). UR-AK57 was almost a full-hH2R agonist and only slightly less potent and efficacious than at gpH2R-Gsalpha. Several NG-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines showed similar potency at hH2R and gpH2R. Most unexpectedly, UR-AK57 exhibited moderately strong partial hH1R agonism with a potency similar to that of histamine, whereas at gpH1R, UR-AK57 was only a very weak partial agonist. Structure/activity relationship studies revealed that both the alkanoyl chain connecting the aromatic or alicyclic substituent with the guanidine moiety and the nature of the carbocycle (cyclohexyl versus phenyl ring) critically determine the pharmacological properties of this class of compounds. Collectively, our data show that gpH1R and gpH R do not necessarily exhibit preference for bulky agonists (2) compared with hH1R and hH2R, respectively, and that UR-AK57 is a promising starting point for the development of both potent and efficacious hH1R and hH2R agonists.     

Pharmacological profile of histaprodifens at four recombinant histamine H1 receptor species isoforms

There are differences in the pharmacological properties of phenylhistamines and histaprodifens between guinea pig histamine H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) and human histamine H(1) receptor (hH(1)R). The aim of this study was to analyze species differences in more detail, focusing on histaprodifen derivatives and including the bovine histamine H(1) receptor (bH(1)R) and rat histamine H(1) receptor (rH(1)R). H(1)R species isoforms were coexpressed with the regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 in Sf9 insect cells. We performed [(3)H]mepyramine binding assays and steady-state GTPase assays. For a novel class of histaprodifens, the chiral histaprodifens, unique species differences between hH(1)R, bH(1)R, rH(1)R, and gpH(1)R were observed. The chiral histaprodifens 8R and 8S were both partial agonists at gpH(1)R, but only 8R was a partial agonist at the other H(1)R species isoforms. An additional phenyl group in chiral histaprodifens 10R and 10S, respectively, resulted in a switch from agonism at gpH(1)Rto antagonism at hH(1)R, bH(1)R, and rH(1)R. In general, histaprodifens showed the order of potency hH(1)R < bH(1)R < rH(1)R < gpH(1)R. An active-state model of gpH(1)R was generated with molecular dynamics simulations. Dimeric histaprodifen was docked into the binding pocket of gpH(1)R. Hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions were detected between dimeric histaprodifen and Asp-116, Ser-120, Lys-187, Glu-190, and Tyr-432. We conclude the following: 1) chiral histaprodifens interact differentially with H(1)R species isoforms; 2) gpH(1)R and rH(1)R, on one hand, and hH(1)R and bH(1)R, on the other hand, resemble each other structurally and pharmacologically; and 3) histaprodifens interact with H(1)R at multiple sites.     

Multiple differences in agonist and antagonist pharmacology between human and guinea pig histamine H1-receptor

Species isoforms of histamine H2-, H3-, and H4-receptors differ in their pharmacological properties. The study aim was to dissect differences between the human H1R (hH1R) and guinea pig H1R (ghH1R). We coexpressed hH1R and gpH1R with regulators of G-protein signaling in Sf9 insect cells and analyzed the GTPase activity of Gq-proteins. Small H1R agonists showed similar effects at hH1R and gpH1R, whereas bulkier 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. Most 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were more efficacious at gpH1R than at hH1R. Several first-generation H1R antagonists were approximately 2-fold, and arpromidine-type H1R antagonists up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. [3H]Mepyramine competition binding studies confirmed the potency differences of the GTPase studies. Phe-153-->Leu-153 or Ile-433-->Val-433 exchange in hH1R (hH1R-->gpH1R) resulted in poor receptor expression, low [3H]mepyramine affinity, and functional inactivity. The Phe-153-->Leu-153/Ile-433-->Val-433 double mutant expressed excellently but only partially changed the pharmacological properties of hH1R. Small H1R agonists and 2-phenylhistamines interacted differentially with human and guinea pig H2R in terms of potency and efficacy, respectively. Our data show the following: 1) there are differences in agonist- and antagonist-pharmacology of hH1R and gpH1R encompassing diverse classes of bulky ligands. These differences may be explained by higher conformational flexibility of gpH1R relative to hH1R; 2) Phe-153 and Ile-433 are critical for proper folding and expression of hH1R; and 3) H2R species isoforms distinguish between H1R agonists.     

Ligand-specific contribution of the N terminus and E2-loop to pharmacological properties of the histamine H1-receptor

There are species differences between human histamine H(1) receptor (hH(1)R) and guinea pig (gp) histamine H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) for phenylhistamines and histaprodifens. Several studies showed participation of the second extracellular loop (E2-loop) in ligand binding for some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Because there are large species differences in the amino acid sequence between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R for the N terminus and E2-loop, we generated chimeric hH(1)Rs with gp E2-loop (h(gpE2)H(1)R) and gp N terminus and gp E2-loop (h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R). hH(1)R, gpH(1)R, and chimeras were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. [(3)H]Mepyramine binding assays and steady-state GTPase assays were performed. In the series hH(1)R > h(gpE2)H(1)R > h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R, we observed a significant decrease in potency of histamine 1 in the GTPase assay. For phenoprodifen 5 and the chiral phenoprodifens 6R and 6S, a significant decrease in affinity and potency was found in the series hH(1)R > h(gpE2)H(1)R > h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R. In addition, we constructed new active-state H(1)R models based on the crystal structure of the human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (hbeta(2)AR). Compared with the H(1)R active-state models based on the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin, the E2-loop differs in its contact to the ligand bound in the binding pocket. In the bovine rhodopsin-based model, the backbone carbonyl of Lys187 (gpH(1)R) interacts with large histaprodifens in the binding pocket, but in the hbeta(2)AR-based model, Lys187 (gpH(1)R) is located distantly from the binding pocket. In conclusion, the differences in N terminus and E2-loop between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R exert an influence on affinity and/or potency for histamine and phenoprodifens 5, 6R, and 6S.     

Evaluation of histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-receptor ligands at the human histamine H4 receptor: identification of 4-methylhistamine as the first potent and selective H4 receptor agonist

The histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) is involved in the chemotaxis of leukocytes and mast cells to sites of inflammation and is suggested to be a potential drug target for asthma and allergy. So far, selective H(4)R agonists have not been identified. In the present study, we therefore evaluated the human H(4)R (hH(4)R) for its interaction with various known histaminergic ligands. Almost all of the tested H(1)R and H(2)R antagonists, including several important therapeutics, displaced less than 30% of specific [(3)H]histamine binding to the hH(4)R at concentrations up to 10 microM. Most of the tested H(2)R agonists and imidazole-based H(3)R ligands show micromolar-to-nanomolar range hH(4)R affinity, and these ligands exert different intrinsic hH(4)R activities, ranging from full agonists to inverse agonists. Interestingly, we identified 4-methylhistamine as a high-affinity H(4)R ligand (K(i) = 50 nM) that has a >100-fold selectivity for the hH(4)R over the other histamine receptor subtypes. Moreover, 4-methylhistamine potently activated the hH(4)R (pEC(50) = 7.4 +/- 0.1; alpha = 1), and this response was competitively antagonized by the selective H(4)R antagonist JNJ 7777120 [1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)-carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine] (pA(2) = 7.8). The identification of 4-methylhistamine as a potent H(4)R agonist is of major importance for future studies to unravel the physiological roles of the H(4)R.     

Similar apparent constitutive activity of human histamine H(2)-receptor fused to long and short splice variants of G(salpha).

Fusion proteins allow for the analysis of receptor/G protein coupling under defined conditions. The beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta(2)AR) fused to the long splice variant of G(salpha) (G(salphaL)) exhibits a higher apparent constitutive activity than the beta(2)-adrenoceptor fused to the short splice variant of G(salpha) (G(salphaS)). Experimentally, this results in higher efficacy and potency of partial agonists and in higher efficacy of inverse agonists at the beta(2)AR fused to G(salphaL) relative to the beta(2)AR fused to G(salphaS), indicating that the agonist-free beta(2)AR and the beta(2)AR occupied by partial agonists promote GDP dissociation from G(salphaL) more efficiently than from G(salphaS). In fact, the GDP affinity of G(salphaS) fused to the beta(2)AR is higher than the GDP affinity of G(salphaL) fused to the beta(2)AR. We asked the question whether the histamine H(2)-receptor (H(2)R) exhibits similar coupling to G(salpha) splice variants as the beta(2)AR. To address this question, we studied H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins expressed in Sf9 cells. In contrast to beta(2)AR-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the potencies and efficacies of partial agonists and the efficacies of inverse agonists were similar at the H(2)R fused to G(salphaL) and G(salphaS) as assessed by guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding and/or steady-state GTPase activity. However, the time course analysis of guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding indicated that G(salphaS) fused to the H(2)R possesses a higher GDP-affinity than G(salphaL) fused to the H(2)R. Our data show that the H(2)R fused to G(salphaL) and G(salphaS) possesses similar constitutive activity and is insensitive to differences in GDP affinity of G(salpha) splice variants. Thus, GDP affinity of G proteins does not generally determine constitutive activity of receptors.     

pH-dependent activity of H1- and H2-histamine receptors in guinea-pig gallbladder

Utilizing histamine and selective agonists for H1- and H2-receptors, we examined the pH dependence of histamine-stimulated tension changes in guinea-pig gallbladder, which contains both contracting H1-receptors and relaxing H2-receptors. In muscle strips contracted with histamine and pH 7.3, increasing pH to 7.8 raised tension further (P less than .025), while decreasing pH caused a fall in tension (P less than .025). The H2-agonist Dimaprit relaxed tension at pH 7.3 and increasing the pH decreased the relaxation (p less than .0125). Contractions in response to H1-agonist 2-pyridylethylamine at pH 7.3 were unchanged when pH was elevated but decreased when pH was lowered (P less than .05). Tension changes in response to slow pH alterations suggested that H1-receptor activity is inhibited below pH 7.1 and H2-receptor activity is inhibited above pH 7.6. These reversible changes in activity probably reflect changes at H1- and H2-receptors rather than alterations in the ionic species of histamine.     

An 80-amino acid deletion in the third intracellular loop of a naturally occurring human histamine H3 isoform confers pharmacological differences and constitutive activity

In this article, we pharmacologically characterized two naturally occurring human histamine H3 receptor (hH3R) isoforms, hH3R(445) and hH3R(365). These abundantly expressed splice variants differ by a deletion of 80 amino acids in the intracellular loop 3. In this report, we show that the hH3R(365) is differentially expressed compared with the hH3R(445) and has a higher affinity and potency for H3R agonists and conversely a lower potency and affinity for H3R inverse agonists. Furthermore, we show a higher constitutive signaling of the hH3R(365) compared with the hH3R(445) in both guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio) triphosphate binding and cAMP assays, likely explaining the observed differences in hH3R pharmacology of the two isoforms. Because H3R ligands are beneficial in animal models of obesity, epilepsy, and cognitive diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and currently entered clinical trails, these differences in H3R pharmacology of these two isoforms are of great importance for a detailed understanding of the action of H3R ligands.     

Histamine receptors in the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig ileum: H1- and H2-receptor-mediated potentiation of the contractile response to electrical stimulation

The effect of histamine on the contractile response to low frequency-electrical field stimulation in the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation of the guinea-pig ileum was investigated. By blocking the direct increase in smooth muscle tone caused by histamine with low concentrations of pyrilamine (10(-9)--5 x 10(-8) M) a dose-dependent, histamine-induced potentiation of the twitch response to electrical stimulation was observed. Blocking the direct actions of histamine with concentrations of pyrilamine greater than 10(-7) M resulted in a biphasic histamine dose-response curve: lower histamine concentrations produced a dose-dependent decrease of the twitch response; higher concentrations produced a potentiation. The potentiating effect of histamine was inhibited by high concentrations of H2-receptor antagonists. Tiotidine (ICI 125, 211) had a pA2 of 5.25, 100 times greater than its pA2 in isolated guinea-pig atria. Blockade of the actions of the H2-receptor agonists dimaprit and tetrahydrozoline also required greater antagonist concentrations. The selective H1-receptor agonist, 2-(2-thiazolyl)-ethylamine, also enhanced the response to electrical stimulation. The potentiating effect of histamine could be blocked by hexamethonium (10(-7)--10(-5) M) but not by atropine. Atropine (10(-9)--10(-8) M) did prevent the decrease in the contraction amplitude induced by histamine in the presence of 10(-7) M pyrilamine. The purinergic antagonist theophylline, adrenergic antagonists or depletion of endogenous catecholamines were without effect. Tetrodotoxin (10(-6) M) inhibited the augmentation induced by histamine. Our results demonstrate that histamine potentiates the acetylcholine-mediated contractile response to electrical field stimulation of guniea-pig ileum via H1- and what may be an H2-receptor subtype.     

Studies on the cardiovascular actions of central histamine H1 and H2 receptors

Histamine administered i.c.v. to conscious freely moving rats results in dose-related pressor responses and bradycardia. The selective H1 agonist pyridylethylamine (PEA) and the H2 agonist impromidine (IMP) were utilized to characterize the central receptor subtypes involved in the central cardiovascular actions of histamine. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored directly via indwelling carotid catheters, and drugs were administered i.c.v. through permanently implanted cannulas. Central administration of PEA or IMP produced dose-dependent pressor responses and bradycardia. The H1 antagonist chlorpheniramine blocked the pressor response, but not the bradycardia produced by PEA. In contrast, the H2 antagonist BMY-25405 blocked both the increase in blood pressure and the bradycardia induced by IMP. Crossover experiments were carried out to examine the specificity of the antagonists' actions. Chlorpheniramine failed to block the actions of IMP and BMY-25405 likewise was ineffective in blocking the actions of PEA. These results suggest that both central H1 and H2 receptors mediate the central pressor effects of histamine, and that PEA and IMP are selectively acting at their respective receptors in the brain. The heart rate effects appear to be mediated directly by central H2 actions, as BMY-25405 was capable of blocking the heart rate changes. The finding that IMP is less potent in the central nervous system, compared to its known greater potency in the periphery, suggests that peripheral and central H2 receptors may be pharmacologically distinct.     

Two novel and selective nonimidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists A-304121 and A-317920: I. In vitro pharmacological effects

Histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonists enhance neurotransmitter release and are being developed for the treatment of a variety of neurological and cognitive disorders. Many potent histamine H3R antagonists contain an imidazole moiety that limits receptor selectivity and the tolerability of this class of compounds. Here we present the in vitro pharmacological data for two novel piperazine amide ligands, A-304121 [4-(3-((2R)-2-aminopropanoyl-1-piperazinyl)propoxy)phenyl)cyclopropylmethanone] and A-317920 [N-((1R)-2-(4-(3-(4-(cyclopropylcarbonyl)phenoxy)propyl)-1-piperazinyl)-1-methyl-2-oxo-ethyl-)-2-furamide], and compare them with the imidazole H3R antagonists ciproxifan, clobenpropit, and thioperamide. Both A-304121 and A-317920 bind potently to recombinant full-length rat H3R(pKi values = 8.6 and 9.2, respectively) but have lower potencies for binding the full-length human H3R (pKi values = 6.1 and 7.0, respectively). A-304121 and A-317920 are potent antagonists at rat H3R in reversing R-alpha-methylhistamine [(R)-alpha-MeHA] inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation (pKb values = 8.0 and 9.1) but weak antagonists at human H3Rs in cyclase (pKb values = 6.0 and 6.3) and calcium mobilization (pKb values = 6.0 and 7.3) assays in cells co-expressing Galphaqi5-protein. Both compounds potently antagonize native H3Rs by blocking histamine inhibition of potassium-evoked [3H]histamine release from rat brain cortical synaptosomes (pKb values = 8.6 and 9.3) and (R)-alpha-MeHA reversal of electric field-stimulated guinea pig ileum contractions (pA2 values = 7.1 and 8.3). A-304121 and A-317920 are also more efficacious inverse agonists in reversing basal guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding at the human H3R (pEC50 values = 5.7 and 7.0) than are the imidazole antagonists. These novel and selective piperazine amides represent useful leads for the development of H3R antagonist therapeutic agents.     

Characterization of histamine receptors in isolated rabbit veins

Veins were isolated from 16 sites of the rabbit venous tree and responses to histamine and histamine receptor agonists were studied to characterize the histamine receptors. Isometric contraction and relaxation of ring segment preparations were recorded. Histamine produced concentration-dependent contractions in all veins in the resting state. Both the maximum response and pD2 value varied remarkably from vein to vein and regional differences in sensitivities to histamine varied considerably from previous findings in dog veins. Also in the precontracted state with a vasoconstricting agent, histamine predominantly contracted the veins. The contractile responses to histamine, in both resting and precontracted states, were antagonized competitively by the histamine H1-receptor antagonist, mepyramine. On the other hand, histamine relaxed the precontracted veins, in the presence of mepyramine. Selective H2-receptor agonists, dimaprit and impromidine, relaxed the precontracted veins even in the absence of mepyramine. These responses to histamine were antagonized competitively by the H2-receptor antagonist, cimetidine or ranitidine. The present study provides quantitative and systematic data regarding histamine receptors in rabbit veins. We propose that: 1) there are both vasoconstrictor H1-receptors and vasodilator H2-receptors, 2) histamine generally contracts rabbit veins through predominant H1-receptors and that 3) the H2-receptor-mediated relaxation does not depend on the presence of the endothelium.     

Effect of histamine H1- and H2-receptor blockade on canine gastric acid secretion

In dogs with gastric fistulae and Heidenhain pouches, inhibition of histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion by the histamine H2-receptor antagonist metiamide is not increased by the addition of a histamine H1-receptor antagonist (mepyramine maleate). Under the conditions of this study there is no evidence for the presence of histamine H1-receptor sites on the gastric parietal cell.     

A comparison of some of the pharmacological properties of etintidine, a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist, with those of cimetidine, ranitidine and tiotidine

Etintidine is a competitive antagonist of histamine H2-receptors in the isolated spontaneously beating guinea-pig right atrium with a pA2 value of 6.6 relative to values of 6.2, 6.7 and 7.3 for cimetidine, ranitidine and tiotidine, respectively. Low affinities for histamine H1 (pA2 = 4.2), cholinergic (pA2 = 4.4) and beta adrenergic (pA2 = 3.8) receptors indicated that etintidine has a high degree of specificity for the H2-receptor. The other antagonists studied also exhibited low affinities for these receptors; however, relative to these compounds, etintidine demonstrated a somewhat greater affinity for cholinergic receptors. Etintidine also antagonized basal gastric acid secretion in the conscious gastric fistula rat and histamine, pentagastrin, carbachol, 2-deoxy-D-glucose and meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion in conscious gastric fistula and Heidenhain pouch dogs. After oral administration to conscious Heidenhain pouch dogs, ED50 values for the inhibition of near maximal gastric acid secretion stimulated by histamine were 7.1, 5.4, 0.74 and 0.69 mumol/kg for cimetidine, etintidine, ranitidine and tiotidine, respectively. Onset and duration of the gastric antisecretory activities of the four compounds were similar. The order of potency as histamine H2-receptor and gastric antisecretory antagonists was cimetidine less than etintidine less than ranitidine less than tiotidine. Based on the high degree of specificity for the H2-receptor and its potent gastric antisecretory activity, etintidine may prove to be a useful agent in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease.     

Isolated parietal cells: histamine response and pharmacology

Isolated, partially purified or enriched rat gastric mucosal parietal cells were shown to respond to histamine and other histaminic H2-receptor agonists as measured by an increased accumulation of [14C]aminopyrine. The response was temperature-dependent, related to parietal cell purity and inhibited selectively and reversibly by H2-receptor antagonists. H1-receptor antagonists noncompetitively inhibited histamine, carbamylcholine and dibutyryl cyclic AMP-stimulated aminopyrine accumulation. The affinity constants calculated for the H2-receptor agonists and antagonists were similar to those previously determined in the studies of activation and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in enriched parietal cell preparations. The results strongly suggest that a correlation exists between the ability of histamine and its analogs to stimulate isolated rat parietal cell function and their ability to stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity. Potentiation of aminopyrine accumulation in the presence of histamine and carbamylcholine is due to specific receptor effects of each secretagogue.     

Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive properties of BP 2-94, a histamine H(3)-receptor agonist prodrug

BP 2-94 is an azomethine prodrug of (R)-alpha-methylhistamine [(R)-alpha-MeHA], a potent and selective histamine H(3)-receptor agonist. When administered orally to mice BP 2-94 was distributed to various peripheral tissues where it released the active drug. BP 2-94 displayed anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive properties in mice. It dose-dependently inhibited carrageenan-induced paw edema with an ED(50) value of 0.17 +/- 0.05 micromol/kg (p.o.) and a maximal effect of 47%. It also reduced Freund's complete adjuvant-induced paw edema in preventive as well as in curative fashion. Repeated oral administrations of BP 2-94 reduced the pre-established Freund's complete adjuvant-induced edema with an ED(50) value of 5 +/- 2 micromol/kg (p.o.) and a maximal effect of 47%. The antiedema effects of BP 2-94 and indomethacin were additive. BP 2-94 was also efficient in reducing cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis in mice: it decreased leukocyte infiltration by 62% and plasma protein extravasation by 73% in urinary bladder. In addition, BP 2-94 displayed antinociceptive activity in the capsaicin-induced licking test via H(3)-receptor stimulation. Its antinociceptive effect was dose dependent, occurring with an ED(50) value of 0.4 +/- 0.1 micromol/kg (p.o.) and a maximal reduction of licking duration by 69%. No tolerance to the antinociceptive effect was observed after repeated administration of BP 2-94 for 3 days. These observations with BP 2-94 suggest that H(3)-receptor agonists might represent a novel class of anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive agents.     

Pharmacological comparison of ORF 17910, a potent, long-acting histamine H2-receptor antagonist, to cimetidine and ranitidine

This paper describes the pharmacology of ORF 17910, a specific, long-acting histamine H2-receptor antagonist. ORF 17910 (ED50 = 0.26 mg/kg) is 26 and 2.7 times more potent p.o. than cimetidine and ranitidine, respectively, at inhibiting acid output in betazole-stimulated total gastric fistula dogs. When given i.v., ORF 17910 (ED50 = 0.06 mg/kg) is 3.6 times more potent than ranitidine. Qualitatively similar antisecretory potency differences are seen in rats (ED50 = 3.7 mg/kg intraduodenal). ORF 17910 retains 43 and 37% of its antisecretory potency 16 hr after dosing in dogs and rats, respectively, suggesting a long duration of action, whereas ranitidine is either inactive (rats) or loses 97% of its potency (dogs) at this time. When the parenteral and enteral (p.o. or intraduodenal) potencies of ORF 17910 and ranitidine are compared, ORF 17910 appears less bioavailable than ranitidine, although this difference is greater in the rat than in the dog and diminishes with time. In rabbit isolated parietal cell (pA2 = 7.96) and guinea pig isolated atria preparations (pA2 = 7.51), ORF 17910 is more potent than both cimetidine and ranitidine at inhibiting the effects of histamine. At high concentrations, the inhibitory effect of ORF 17910 in atria can not be overcome completely, a property which may contribute to its long duration of action in vivo. In several additional test systems, ORF 17910 does not exhibit any biologically significant pharmacology and appears to be specific for the histamine H2-receptor.     

Histamine inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in an intercellular adhesion molecule-1- and B7.1-dependent manner

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is recognized as a key molecule in the pathogenesis of Gram negative sepsis and septic shock. In the present study, we demonstrate that LPS (1-1000 pg/ml) concentration dependently up-regulated the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, B7.1, and B7.2 on human monocytes using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha production induced by LPS in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was inhibited by the addition of antibodies against these adhesion molecules, suggesting the dependence of TNF-alpha production on cell-cell interaction through these adhesion molecules. Moreover, we found that histamine (10(-7)-10(-4) M) concentration dependently inhibited the expression of ICAM-1 and B7.1, but not B7.2 on monocytes induced by LPS. Histamine also inhibited the responses of TNF-alpha production induced by LPS. The modulatory effects of histamine on ICAM-1 and B7.1 expression and TNF-alpha production were all concentration dependently antagonized by famotidine but not by d-chlorpheniramine and thioperamide, and were mimicked by selective H2-receptor agonists but not by H1-, H3-, and H4-receptor agonists, indicating the involvement of H2-receptors in the histamine action. Dibutyryl cAMP down-regulated ICAM-1 and B7.1 expression on monocytes stimulated by LPS, suggesting the mediation by the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-protein kinase A pathway of H2-receptor activation. These results as a whole indicated that histamine via H2-receptor inhibited the LPS-induced TNF-alpha production through the regulation of ICAM-1 and B7.1 expression, leading to the reduction of innate immune response stimulated by LPS.