理性情绪疗法对癌症患者配偶焦虑和抑郁情绪的影响

目的:探讨理性情绪疗法对癌症患者配偶焦虑和抑郁情绪的影响。方法:选择2013年1~12月癌症患者配偶120人为研究对象,按照随机数字表法等分为观察组和对照组,对照组进行常规健康教育和指导,观察组在此基础上依据理性情绪疗法中的心理诊断、领悟、修通、再教育4方面,分阶段、分主次进行护理干预,对两组患者采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)进行干预效果评估。结果:干预后观察组患者配偶焦虑、抑郁程度明显低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:癌症患者配偶焦虑和抑郁等负性情绪严重,理性情绪疗法能有效改善癌症患者配偶的焦虑和抑郁状况。     

人文关怀对住院患者焦虑及抑郁的影响

目的:探讨人文关怀对住院患者焦虑、抑郁的影响.方法:将70例住院患者随机分为实验组和对照组各35例,对照组给予常规护理,实验组在对照组基础上加强人文关怀护理.采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)比较两组患者干预前后焦虑、抑郁情况.结果:实验组干预后焦虑、抑郁评分明显低于干预前及对照组干预后(P<0.05).结论:住院患者存在不同程度的焦虑、抑郁心理,人文关怀能降低患者不良心理应激反应,提高患者满意度.     

癌症患者焦虑抑郁情绪的护理

近年来，恶性肿瘤（癌症）患者的生存期得以延长，但恶性肿瘤患者在患病后的心理状况及生活质量是影响患者健康的重要因素。一旦患了癌症，患者紧张、恐惧和焦虑的心情是不难理解的，他们比其他患者面临着更为错综的人际关系和更为复杂的心理活动。恶性肿瘤患者焦虑抑郁情感障碍发生率明显高于良性疾病患者。本文对癌症患者焦虑抑郁情绪的概念、特征进行分析并对护理措施进行综述。     

抑郁和焦虑情绪与癌症患者生活质量的关系

目的 探讨抑郁和焦虑情绪对癌症患者生活质量的影响。方法 对91例癌症患者分别用Zung抑郁自评量表（SDS）、焦虑自评量表（SAS）、36项健康状况调查简表（SF36）进行评定。结果 有抑郁情绪者46例（51．5％），有焦虑情绪者22例（24．1％）。非抑郁患者的生活质量优于抑郁患者（P〈0．05），非焦虑患者的生活质量明显优于焦虑患者（P〈0．01）。结论 抑郁和焦虑情绪对癌症患者的生活质量有显著影响，恰当地识别和处理癌症患者存在的心理问题应该是整个护理治疗的一部分。     

癌症患者焦虑抑郁情绪与性别、文化程度、医疗费支付方式的研究

目的对癌症患者焦虑、抑郁情绪状况的资料进行比较，探讨癌症患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的特点及其相关因素。方法采用Zung＇s自评焦虑量表（SAS）和Zung＇s自评抑郁量表（SDS），对97例癌症患者进行测定，然后，探讨癌症患者焦虑、抑郁情绪与不同性别、文化程度、经济状况的关系。结果本次调查中不同性别、医疗费支付方式与癌症患者焦虑、抑郁发生率之间无显著差异（P〉0.05），不同文化程度与焦虑发生率有显著差异（P〈0.05）与抑郁发生率无显著差异（P〉0.05）。结论癌症患者中焦虑、抑郁情绪发生率较高，不同性别、文化程度、经济状况与癌症患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的发生率有差别。且发生率明显高于一般人群。     

人文关怀对慢性心力衰竭患者焦虑、抑郁状况的影响分析

目的:探讨加强以人文关怀为主的综合护理干预措施对慢性心力衰竭患者焦虑、抑郁状态的影响,提高临床护理效率。方法:将存在焦虑、抑郁状态的慢性心力衰竭患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,在临床护理工作中,对观察组患者进行综合护理干预措施,包括加强人文护理,进行心理干预护理等综合措施,对照组采用常规护理。比较两组患者住院前后抑郁自评量表(SDS)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)评定结果。结果:经过综合护理干预,两组患者焦虑、抑郁状态均有所减轻,但是观察组效果明显高于对照组,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:以人文关怀为主的综合护理措施可有效降低慢性心力衰竭患者的抑郁状态。     

心灵关怀对放化疗联合治疗鼻咽癌患者负性情绪与生活质量的影响

目的探讨心灵关怀对鼻咽癌患者负性情绪及生活质量的影响。方法将92例鼻咽癌治疗患者分为对照组47例和干预组45例。对照组给予常规护理,干预组在常规护理基础上实施心灵关怀护理。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表、欧洲癌症患者生活质量调查问卷分别在患者入院时、入院4周和入院8周进行问卷调查。结果干预组焦虑、抑郁水平低于对照组(P<0.01),总体生活质量优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论心灵关怀能有效缓解鼻咽癌患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪,改善其生活质量,为肿瘤的治疗康复护理提供了新的思路。     

癌症患者焦虑抑郁情绪的护理

近年来,恶性肿瘤(癌症)患者的生存期得以延长,但恶性肿瘤患者在患病后的心理状况及生活质量是影响患者健康的重要因素[1].一旦患了癌症,患者紧张、恐惧和焦虑的心情是不难理解的,他们比其他患者面临着更为错综的人际关系和更为复杂的心理活动[2].恶性肿瘤患者焦虑抑郁情感障碍发生率明显高于良性疾病患者[3].本文对癌症患者焦虑抑郁情绪的概念、特征进行分析并对护理措施进行综述.……     

癌症患者亲属的焦虑、抑郁状况及相关因素研究

目的了解癌症患者主要照顾亲属的焦虑、抑郁状况及相关影响因素。方法采用CESD量表、SAS量表及一般情况调查表对106例住院癌症患者的主要照顾亲属进行问卷调查。结果106例癌症患者亲属的抑郁自评分为（18．75±9．06）分,高于国内常模,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;55．7％的亲属存在抑郁症状;焦虑自评分为（33．94±7．09）分,高于国内常模,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;22．6％的亲属存在焦虑症状;患者的配偶和患者躯体症状较多的亲属更易发生焦虑。结论癌症患者的主要照顾亲属存在较严重的焦虑、抑郁情绪,其心理健康状况受多种因素影响,医务人员应积极采取针对性的干预措施,提高患者亲属的心理健康水平。     

Family members of critically ill cancer patients: assessing the symptoms of anxiety and depression

Objective  To determine prevalence and factors associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of critically ill cancer patients. Design  Prospective cohort study. Setting  A 23-bed intensive care unit in a tertiary cancer centre. Patients and Participants  Three hundred consecutive families of cancer patients with length of stay >72 h in ICU. Intervention  None. Measurements and main results  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire and critical care family needs inventory were completed by family members. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in family members was 71 and 50.3%, respectively. Regarding the patients’ disease, family depression was correlated with presence of metastasis, whereas hematological malignancies correlated with family’ anxiety. Anxiety was independently associated with one patient-related factor (prolonged mechanical ventilation) and two family-related factors (catholic religion and gender). Factors associated with symptoms of depression included one patient-related factor (presence of metastasis) and one family-related factor (gender). Conclusions  Present findings demonstrated a high prevalence of anxiety and depression in critically ill cancer patients’ family members during an intensive care unit stay. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

延续护理对产褥期妇女焦虑抑郁情绪的影响

目的探讨延续护理对产褥期妇女焦虑和抑郁情绪的影响。方法将160例产褥期妇女随机分为观察组与对照组,每组各80例,对照组应用传统门诊随访模式,观察组应用延续护理随访模式,在出院前及出院后6周,两组均采用焦虑自评量表( SAS)和抑郁自评量表( SDS)进行评分。结果两组产妇SAS与SDS在入院前评定结果差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);6周后再次评定,观察组SAS与SDS得分明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义( P<0.01);观察组临床疗效优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义( P<0.01)。结论延续护理干预可以有效改善产褥期妇女的焦虑、抑郁情绪,提高其生活质量。     

Is there a correlation between spirituality and anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer?

Aims and objectives To establish whether there is a correlation between spirituality and anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer.Patients and methods Patients with a diagnosis of cancer at St. Peter’s day hospice in Bristol were asked to complete three questionnaires to assess anxiety, depression and spirituality. Informed consent was obtained. Anxiety and depression are indicated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, and spirituality is indicated by scores on the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) and the Royal Free Interview for Spiritual and Religious Beliefs. As will be explained, religion and spirituality are generally recognised as having different meanings—religion entailing a relationship with a higher being, while spirituality can be thought of in terms of meaning and purpose in life.Results Eighty-five complete data sets were obtained. A significant negative correlation was found between both anxiety and depression scores and overall spiritual well-being scores (p<0.0001). When the SWBS subscale scores were analysed individually, a significant negative correlation was found between the existential well-being scores and the anxiety and depression scores (p<0.001). However, no correlation was found between the religious well-being scores and anxiety or depression.Conclusions This study found a significant negative correlation between spirituality (in particular, the existential aspect) and anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer. Religious well-being and strength of belief had no impact on psychological well-being in this study.     

灵性关怀培训对护士灵性健康和灵性照护能力的影响

目的探讨灵性关怀培训方案对护士灵性健康和灵性照护能力的影响。方法2018年3—9月以自愿报名的方式在某省肿瘤医院招募80名护士参与研究,以随机数字表法将其分为试验组(40名)和对照组(40名)。试验组在常规业务学习的基础上连续6个月接受每月2次的集体灵性关怀培训,主要形式包括专家授课、团体干预、临床实践和案例分享;对照组连续6个月参与医院组织的业务学习。培训前后,采用灵性健康量表和灵性照护认知量表对两组护士进行调查,比较培训效果。结果培训6个月后,试验组护士灵性健康和灵性照护认知总分分别为(106.30±8.72)、(185.75±16.53)分,均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为5.38、4.52;P<0.01);各维度得分也均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值为2.22~5.22,P<0.05);且试验组护士的灵性健康和灵性照护认知总分及各维度得分均高于试验组干预前得分,差异有统计学意义(t值为3.18~8.99,P<0.01)。结论基于自我与患者共同成长理念构建的灵性关怀培训方案可提高护士的灵性健康和灵性照护认知水平。     

心理行为干预对乳腺癌患者术后焦虑抑郁的影响

目的:探讨心理行为干预对乳腺癌患者术后焦虑抑郁的影响。方法将60例乳腺癌患者随机分为对照组(30例)和心理行为干预组(30例),两组患者均接受改良根治术。干预前后均采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)进行检测,均于术后1天进行测量,干预组根据患者测量结果逐项进行心理行为干预每天1次,每次25～30min,连续7天。对照组患者不接受心理行为干预。术后8天对两组患者再次进行测量。结果心理行为干预组术后8天SAS和SDS评分均明显低于对照组。结论乳腺癌患者术后存在焦虑、抑郁负性情绪,心理行为干预可以改善焦虑、抑郁情绪。     

双心护理对冠状动脉旁路移植患者围术期焦虑抑郁的影响

目的:探讨双心护理干预对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者围术期焦虑抑郁的影响。方法:将115例行冠状动脉造影确定需要行CABG患者随机分为干预组60例和对照组55例。对照组给予常规护理,干预组在此基础上给予双心护理,即在注重患者心血管疾病整体护理同时强化心理护理的现代护理模式,并给予氟哌噻吨美利曲辛片和舍曲林等药物干预。从社区选取25位与患者性别、年龄、生活状况相近的正常人作为正常对照组,采用Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)对三组进行焦虑抑郁评估。结果:干预前干预组和对照组SAS和SDS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),但均明显高于正常对照组(P0.01);术后干预组SAS和SDS评分均比术前降低(P0.01),且低于对照组(P0.01)。结论:双心护理干预明显减轻或缓解CABG围术期患者焦虑和抑郁情绪,有助于改善预后。     

The effects of spiritual care intervention on spiritual well-being,loneliness, hope and life satisfaction of intensive care unit patients

BackgroundThe intensive care unit is a place where patients try to cope with pain and question the meaning and purpose of life and spiritual needs emerge.ObjectiveThe present study was conducted to examine the effects of spiritual care interventions on the spiritual well-being, loneliness, hope, and life satisfaction of patients treated in intensive care.Research methodologyThe study was conducted in an intensive care unit as an interventional study with a randomized pre-test, post-test, and control group between September and December 2021. A total of 64 patients, 32 in the intervention group and 32 in the control group, were included in the sample. The patients in the intervention group received eight sessions (twice a week) of spiritual nursing interventions according to the Traditions-Reconciliation-Understandings-Searching-Teachers model in the intensive care unit, while the control group received routine nursing care.ResultsThe mean age of the participants was 63.53 ± 4.10 years in the intervention group and 63.37 ± 3.18 years in the control group. Most of the participants in both the intervention (59.4 %) and control (68.7 %) groups were female. Following the intervention, the findings showed that the intervention had positive effects on patients’ spiritual well-being (t = -10.382), loneliness (t = 13.635), hope (t = -10.440), and life satisfaction (t = -10.480) levels (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIt was found that the spiritual care provided in the intensive care unit positively affected patients’ spiritual well-being, hope, loneliness, and life satisfaction levels. It can be recommended that nurses working in intensive care develop a spiritually supportive environment by addressing the spiritual issues of patients and their relatives and using existing spiritual care services.Implications for clinical practiceIntensive care nurses should provide an environment and nursing care that meet their patients’ spiritual needs. Spiritual care can be given to improve spiritual well-being, hope, and life satisfaction levels and to alleviate loneliness in intensive care patients.