The prevention of incisional hernia formation using a delayed-release polymer of basic fibroblast growth factor

OBJECTIVE: We sought to reduce the high incidence of abdominal wall incisional hernias using sustained release growth factor therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Incisional hernias complicate 11% of abdominal wall closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional hernia repairs in the United States each year. Mechanical improvements alone in mesh, suture material, and surgical technique have failed to reduce the high rate of fascial wound failure. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats underwent midline celiotomies that were closed with fast-absorbing suture to induce early biomechanical wound failure and incisional hernia formation. In primary wounds, fascial incisions were closed adjacent to a continuous release polygalactone polymer rod containing basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), no growth factor (control-rod), or without rods. In a second group, incisional hernias were repaired with either bFGF or control-rod therapy. Breaking strength was measured on postoperative day (POD) 7, and the incidence of incisional hernia formation was determined on POD 28. RESULTS: Treatment with bFGF rods significantly increased fascial wound breaking strength. In the "hernia-prevention" experiments, incisional hernias developed in 90% of untreated incisions, 60% of control-rod incisions, and only 30% of bFGF-rod incisions (P < 0.05). In the "hernia-treatment" experiments, recurrent incisional hernias developed in 86% of control-rod incisions compared with only 23% of bFGF-rod treated incisions (P < 0.05). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated increased angiogenesis and collagen protein production in bFGF treated incisions. CONCLUSION: The treatment of abdominal fascial incisions with a sustained-release bFGF polymer significantly lowered the incidence of incisional hernias and the recurrence rate after repair.     

Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties: a mechanism for decreased hernia recurrences in comparison with suture repair

BACKGROUND: An improved understanding of load-bearing soft tissue repair suggests that the mechanism for the improved outcomes after alloplastic incisional herniorrhaphy involves more than simple tissue replacement or material strength. We test the hypothesis that postrepair abdominal wall elastic properties are most predictive of successful abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS: A rodent model of chronic incisional hernia formation was used. Midline incisional hernias were repaired primarily with suture (n = 24) or polypropylene mesh (n = 24). Rodents were sacrificed at serial postoperative time points over 60 days. Intact abdominal wall strips were cut perpendicular to the wound for tensiometric analysis. Biopsies of wound provisional matrix were obtained for biochemical analysis. RESULTS: Recurrent incisional hernia formation was significantly decreased in the mesh-repair group, compared with the suture-repair group (5/24 vs 14/24, P = .02). Mesh-repaired abdominal walls demonstrated significantly more elongation (P < .01) and less stiffness (P < .01). Toughness was equal between wounds, although the suture-repaired wounds had increased recovery of tensile strength (P < .01). There were no significant differences in collagen deposition after postoperative day 7. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties as measured by increased elongation and reduced stiffness. Increased abdominal wall elasticity after incisional hernia repair in turn results in lower recurrence rates.     

Incisional herniation induces decreased abdominal wall compliance via oblique muscle atrophy and fibrosis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to measure abdominal wall myopathic histologic and mechanical changes during incisional herniation and its effect on incisional hernia repairs. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Unloaded skeletal muscles undergo characteristic atrophic changes, including change in fiber type composition, decreased cross-sectional area, and pathologic fibrosis. We hypothesize that these atrophic changes decrease muscle elastic properties and may contribute to the high laparotomy wound failure rate observed following incisional hernia repair. METHODS: A rat model of chronic incisional hernia formation was used. Failing midline laparotomy incisions developed into incisional hernias. Controls were uninjured and sham laparotomy (healed) groups. Internal oblique muscles were harvested for fiber typing, measurement of cross-sectional area, collagen deposition, and mechanical analysis. Mesh hernia repairs were performed on a second group of rats with chronic incisional hernias or acute anterior abdominal wall myofascial defects. RESULTS: The hernia group developed lateral abdominal wall shortening and oblique muscle atrophy. This was associated with a change in the distribution of oblique muscle fiber types, decreased cross-sectional area, and pathologic fibrosis consistent with myopathic disuse atrophy. These muscles exhibited significant decreased extensibility and increased stiffness. The healed (sham) laparotomy group expressed an intermediate phenotype between the uninjured and hernia groups. Recurrent hernia formation was most frequent in the chronic hernia model, and hernia repairs mechanically disrupted at a lower force compared with nonherniated abdominal walls. CONCLUSIONS: The internal oblique muscles of the abdominal wall express a pattern of changes consistent with those seen in chronically unloaded skeletal muscles. The internal oblique muscles become fibrotic during herniation, reducing abdominal wall compliance and increasing the transfer of load forces to the midline wound at the time of hernia repair.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal wall or parastomal hernias following major genitourinary or abdominal surgery are a significant surgical problem. Open surgical repair is difficult because of adhesion formation and poor definition of the hernia fascial edges. Laparoscopic intervention has allowed effective correction of these abdominal wall hernias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1997 to June 2000, 14 male and 3 female patients underwent laparoscopic abdominal wall herniorrhaphy at our institution. Of these, 13 patients received incisional and 4 parastomal hernia repair. All hernia defects were repaired using a measured piece of Gore-Tex DualMesh. A retrospective review of each patient's history and operative characteristics was undertaken. RESULTS: All repairs were successful. No patient required conversion to an open procedure, and there were no intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 4 (range 2.5-6.5) and 4.3 (range 3.75-5.5) hours in the incisional and parastomal group, respectively. The average hospital stay was 4.9 days (range 2-12) for the incisional group and 3.8 (range 3-4) days for the parastomal group. To date, two patients experienced a recurrence of incisional hernias, at 5 and 8 months postoperatively. No recurrences have developed in the parastomal hernia repairs at 2 to 33 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall incisional or parastomal hernias provides an excellent anatomic correction of such defects. Adhesions are lysed under magnified laparoscopic vision, and the true limits of the fascial defects are clearly identified. The DualMesh is easy to work with and has yielded excellent results. A comparison with open repair with respect to perioperative factors and long-term success is currently under way.     

Reconstruction of the abdominal wall for incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall reconstruction with mobilization of autologous tissue has evolved as a reliable option for patients with incisional hernias. METHODS: With the aim of evaluating morbidity and recurrence rates in patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction for incisional hernia repair, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 188 patients treated between 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: Primary approximation of the fascial defect was achieved in 77% and was reinforced by either mesh placement or rectus muscle advancement. The remaining 23% were reconstructed either by mesh placement, components separation, or distant flap mobilization. Median follow-up was 15 months. Overall morbidity rate was 38%; recurrence rate was 13%. Dimensions of the hernia and intraoperative enterotomies were associated with postoperative complications. Lack of complete restoration of the myofascial abdominal wall continuity was associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incisional hernias, techniques involving autologous tissue mobilization are safe and associated with low recurrence rates.     

Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: A review of Eisenhower Army Medical Center's experience using Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratories, Covington, Georgia) for the repair of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol. RESULTS: From July 30, 2003 to February 12, 2005, 9 patients underwent repair of complicated fascial defects with Permacol. Indications for surgery included reoperative incisional hernia repair after removal of a infected mesh (3 patients), reconstruction of a fascial defect after resection of an abdominal wall tumor (2 patients), incisional hernia repair in a patient with a previous abdominal wall infection after a primary incisional hernia repair (1 patient), incisional hernia repair in a patient with an ostomy and an open midline wound (1 patient), emergent repair of incisional hernia with strangulated bowel and multiple intra-abdominal abscesses (1 patient), and excision of infected mesh and drainage of intra-abdominal abscess with synchronous repair of the abdominal wall defect (1 patient). At a median follow-up of 18.2 months, 1 recurrent hernia existed after intentional removal of the Permacol. This patient developed an abdominal wall abscess 7 months after hernia repair secondary to erosion from a suture. Overall, 1 patient developed exposure of the Permacol after a skin dehiscence. The wound was treated with local wound care, and the Permacol was salvaged. Despite the presence of contamination (wound classification II, III, or IV) in 5 of 9 patients (56%), no infectious complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Complex reconstruction of the abdominal wall can be associated with a high complication rate. Placement of a permanent prosthetic mesh in a contaminated field is associated with a high rate of wound infections and subsequent mesh removal. Permacol becomes incorporated by tissue ingrowth and neovascularization. Permacol is a safe and acceptable alternative to prosthetic mesh in the repair of complicated abdominal wall defects.     

Review of technique for combined closed incisional hernia repair and panniculectomy status post-open bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: After open bariatric surgery, many patients develop incisional hernia. Patients who were once morbidly obese provide a unique challenge to hernia repair, given the larger nature of their fascial defects and the concomitant problem of extreme amounts of abdominal wall laxity. We reviewed a technique for surgical repair of incisional hernias combined with panniculectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients status post-open bariatric surgery who underwent incisional hernia repair with overlay mesh and combined panniculectomy between 2000 and 2003. RESULTS: Hernia repair and panniculectomy were performed 18 months after open bariatric surgery. The patients had an average weight loss of 58.6 kg. Mean follow-up after hernia repair and panniculectomy was 18 months. Patients underwent prefascial hernia repair with plication of the fascial edges followed by midline anchoring of overlay mesh. The averave amount of excess tissue excised via panniculectomy was 3,001 g. The average hospital stay was 4 days. Minor wound problems (eg, suture abscess, seroma) occurred in 20 patients. Seromas were treated with serial aspiration in the office. There were no intra-abdominal complications or recurrences of the incisional hernias. CONCLUSION: Closed hernia repair with prefascial plication and overlay mesh is a safe, effective alternative to traditional incisional hernia repair. It provides adequate hernia repair without recurrence and eliminates intra-abdominal complications. It is our belief that combining the hernia repair and panniculectomy minimizes the risk of hernia recurrence through alleviation of stress on the repair by removing excess abdominal wall tissue.     

Fascial fibroblast kinetic activity is increased during abdominal wall repair compared to dermal fibroblasts

Abdominal wall fascial wound healing failure is a common clinical problem for general surgeons, manifesting in early postoperative fascial dehiscence as well as delayed development of incisional hernias. We previously reported that abdominal wall fascial incisions normally recover breaking strength faster than simultaneous dermal incisions in a rodent model. The accelerated fascial repair was associated with greater fibroblast cellularity within fascial wounds and increased wound collagen deposition. The current study was designed to determine whether accelerated fascial healing is the result of increased fascial fibroblast kinetic activity as measured by a more efficient fibroblast phenotype for binding to and remodeling a collagen matrix. Using a new model of abdominal wall repair, fibroblast cell cultures were developed from uninjured and wounded fascia and compared to dermal fibroblasts in order to define the fibroproliferative kinetic properties of abdominal wall fibroblasts. Fascial wound fibroblasts produced a more efficient and greater overall collagen lattice compaction compared to dermal fibroblasts. Acute fascial wound fibroblasts also showed enhanced cell proliferation compared to dermal fibroblasts but no significant differences in collagen production when normalized to cell number. These results suggest that fascial fibroblasts express distinct acute repair phenotypes and therefore a specific mechanism for fascial repair following injury.     

The biology of hernia formation

Abdominal wall hernias occur when tissue structure and function are lost at the load-bearing muscle, tendon, and fascial layer. The fundamental biologic mechanisms are primary fascial pathology or surgical wound failure. In both cases, cellular and extracellular molecular matrix defects occur. Primary abdominal wall hernias have been associated with extracellular matrix diseases. Incisional hernias and recurrent inguinal hernias more often involve a combination of technical and biologic limitations. Defects in wound healing and extracellular matrix synthesis contribute to the high incidence of incisional hernia formation following laparotomy.     

Laparoscopic tension-free repair of anterior abdominal wall incisional and ventral hernias with an intraperitoneal Gore-Tex mesh: prospective study and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates after repair of incisional and ventral hernias range from 18% to 52%. Prosthetic open repair has decreased this rate, but the wide fascial dissection it requires increases the complication rate. Laparoscopic repair is a safe and effective alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed including 86 patients (63 women and 23 men) with a mean age of 54 years (range 29-79 years) having incisional or ventral hernias who underwent laparoscopic repair in our institution between July 1994 and October 2001. The majority of the patients were obese with a mean body mass index of 31.7 kg/m2. The abdominal wall defect size ranged from 2 X 1 cm to 20 X 13 cm. In all cases, a Gore-Tex mesh (Dual Mesh, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was used in sizes ranging from 10 X 15 cm to 20 X 30 cm. RESULTS: Nineteen repairs were performed for recurrent hernias (12 incisional and 7 ventral). The mean operative time was 110.3 minutes (range 50-240 minutes). There was one open conversion (1.2%), one intraoperative complication (1.2%), and no deaths. There were no wound or mesh infections. Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (10.6%) and late complications occurred in 16 patients (18.8%). The average hospital stay was 4.8 days (range 2-19 days). During a mean follow-up of 37 months (range 6-73 months), there were 6 hernia recurrences (7%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia and ventral hernia appears to be safe, especially with the use of Gore-Tex mesh, and is proving to be effective as it decreases pain, complications, hospital stay, and recurrences.     

Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair

Incisional hernias occur primarily as a result of high tension and inadequate healing of a previous incision, the latter of which is frequently related to infection at the surgical site. Despite recent advances in operative techniques, the recurrence rate remains unacceptably high. To evaluate the impact of different predisposing factors for the recurrence of incisional hernia, we reviewed retrospectively the medical records of 297 patients who had undergone incisional herniorrhaphy (188 tissue repairs, 109 mesh repairs) in our hospital. Demographic data (age and gender), type of repair, body mass index, hernia size, presence of chronic illnesses and wound complications were evaluated in a univariate and multivariate manner analysis. The overall recurrence rate was 30.3%, with the recurrence rate in patients who underwent tissue repair being 39.4% and that in patients following prosthetic repair 14.6%. The recurrence rate was significantly influenced by type of repair, obesity, hernia size, wound healing disorders and some chronic comorbidities. We conclude that it is necessary to become familar with the risk factors for recurrence of incisional hernia in order to eliminate or decrease their effect on the positive outcome of incisional herniorrhaphy.     

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: an initial institutional experience

BACKGROUND: Ventral and incisional hernias remain a problem for surgeons with reported recurrence rates of 25-50% for open repairs. Laparoscopic approaches offer several theoretical advantages over open repairs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair from April to December 2000 were prospectively entered in a database. Patients underwent repair with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh. Full-thickness abdominal wall nonabsorbable sutures and 5-mm tacks were placed circumferentially. RESULTS: Of 32 patients, 15 underwent incisional repair, 13 had repair of a recurrent incisional hernia, and 4 had repair of a primary abdominal wall defect. Two procedures [2/32; 6.3%] were converted to open, one for loss of abdominal domain and one for neovascularization due to cirrhosis. There were two early recurrences [2/30; 6.7%]. Both of these failures occurred in patients with hernia defects extending to the inguinal ligament, preventing placement of full-thickness abdominal wall sutures inferiorly. Average operating time was 128 +/- 42 min (range 37-225 min). Average length of stay was 1.8 days [range 0-7 days]. There were no transfusion requirements or wound infections. One patient underwent a small bowel resection after completion of repair. One patient required drainage of a seroma 4 weeks after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair can be safely performed with an acceptable early recurrence rate, operative time, length of stay, and morbidity. Securing the mesh with full-thickness abdominal wall sutures in at least four quadrants remains a key factor in preventing early recurrence.     

The use of the Mitek anchoring system on the iliac crest for flank incisional hernia repair

Large incisional or ventral hernia repairs continue to be a challenge for general and plastic surgeons. Hernias without tangential fascial substance eventually face problems with recurrence. We present a case report of a patient who had undergone multiple repairs for a right flank incisional hernia which eventually recurred. We demonstrated the successful use of the Mitek® anchoring system in this repair. Using the Mitek® system in hernia repair is an innovative approach for large abdominal hernias with limited areas for fixation of synthetic mesh. Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study     

Long-term clinical,radiological, and histological follow-up after complex ventral incisional hernia repair using urinary bladder matrix graft reinforcement: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Complex ventral incisional hernia repair represents a challenging clinical condition in which biologically derived graft reinforcement is often utilized, but little long-term data inform that decision. Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) has shown effectiveness in diverse clinical settings as durable reinforcement graft material, but it has not been studied over a long term in ventral incisional hernia repair. This study evaluates the clinical, radiographic, and histological outcome of complex incisional hernia repair using UBM reinforcement with 12–70 months of follow-up.

Methods

A single-arm, retrospective observational study of all ventral incisional hernia repairs utilizing UBM reinforcement over a 6-year time frame by a single surgeon was performed. Patients were assessed in long-term follow-up clinically and with the Carolina Comfort Scale. A subset of patients was assessed with abdominal wall ultrasound or CT scan. Three patients had abdominal wall fascial biopsies years after the incisional hernia repair with UBM graft, and the histology is analyzed.

Results

64 patients underwent repair of complex incisional hernias with UBM graft reinforcement by a single surgeon. 42 patients had concomitant procedures including large or small bowel resection, excision of infected mesh, evacuation of abscess or hematoma, cholecystectomy, or panniculectomy with abdominoplasty. 16 patients had ostomies at the time of repair. Median follow-up time is 36 months, with a range of 12–70 months. Nine patients (14%) have required surgical repair of a recurrent hernia, and a tenth patient has a recurrence that is managed non-surgically, for a total recurrence rate of 15.6% over the entire time frame. Median time to recurrence was 32 months, and a Kaplan–Meier freedom from recurrence curve is depicted. 28 patients have undergone ultrasound or CT assessments of the abdominal wall which demonstrate radiographic fascial integrity 12–70 months after repair. Three patients have been re-explored for unrelated reasons in the years following ventral incisional hernia repair with UBM, and full thickness fascial biopsies demonstrate a robust remodeling response histologically similar to native myofascial tissue. No patients have developed graft infection, fistulization to the graft, or required graft explantation. Carolina Comfort Scale assessment of 45 patients 3 years after the repair averaged 16 out of a possible 115.

Conclusion

In 64 patients undergoing complex ventral incisional hernia repair with UBM reinforcement, all have experienced successful resolution of complex clinical conditions and 15.6% of these repairs have recurred at a median follow-up of 3 years. Three full-thickness biopsies of the repaired fascia years later shed light on a promising remodeling response which may signal strength and durability comparable to native fascia.

     

Lumbar incisional hernias: diagnostic and management dilemma.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar hernias occur infrequently and can be congenital, primary (inferior or Petit type, and superior or Grynfeltt type), posttraumatic, or incisional. They are bounded by the 12th rib, the iliac crest, the erector spinae, and the external oblique muscle. Most postoperative incisional hernias occur in nephrectomy or aortic aneurysm repair incisions. CASE REPORT: We present 2 patients who had undergone flank incisions and subsequently developed significant bulging of that area. The first patient had an atrophy of the abdominal wall musculature while the other had a large lumbar incisional hernia that was repaired laparoscopically. DISCUSSION: Lumbar incisional hernias are often diffuse with fascial defects that are usually hard to appreciate. Computed tomography scan is the diagnostic modality of choice and allows differentiating them from abdominal wall musculature denervation atrophy complicating flank incisions. Repairing these hernias is difficult due to the surrounding structures. Principles of laparoscopic repair include lateral decubitus positioning with table flexed, adhesiolysis, and reduction of hernia contents, securing ePTFE mesh with spiral tacks and transfascial sutures to an intercostal space superiorly, iliac crest periosteum inferiorly, and rectus muscle anteriorly. Posteriorly, the mesh is secured to psoas major fascia with intracorporeal sutures to avoid nerve injury. CONCLUSION: Lumbar incisional hernia must be differentiated from muscle atrophy with no fascial defect. The laparoscopic approach provides an attractive option for this often challenging problem.     

Incarcerated incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon after appendectomy: A case report

IntroductionIncisional hernia after appendectomy is rare, affecting 0.4% to 0.9% of cases. The small bowel and omentum are commonly herniated through the abdominal wall defect, but incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon is extremely rare.Case presentationA 78-year-old man presented with a right lower quadrant abdominal wall mass on the previous McBurney incision site. He had a history of appendectomy for appendicitis 40 years ago. Computed tomography (CT) showed the sigmoid colon herniated thorough the abdominal wall defect. During the operation, a feces-impacted sigmoid colon was found protruding through the defect of the abdominal wall. Reduction of the sigmoid colon into the peritoneal cavity and herniorrhaphy with primary repair were performed.DiscussionThe ascending and descending colon are fixed into the retroperitoneum, whereas the transverse and sigmoid colon are not, which can allow these bowel segments to herniate through a weak abdominal wall just as small bowel loops do. However, incisional hernia of the colon is extremely rare. The diagnosis of incisional hernia can be easily made because a reducible abdominal wall mass can be detected by physical examination. In cases with rare type of hernia, CT can identify unusual types of abdominal hernias and differentiate hernias from neoplasms, inflammatory disease, and hematoma.ConclusionAlthough incisional hernia of the colon after appendectomy is extremely rare and preoperative diagnosis by physical examination is difficult, CT is a useful method to make the correct diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary invasive intervention, particularly in patients with an unusual abdominal wall mass.     

Incisional hernia of the abdominal wall. Pathophysiology, etiology and prosthetic repair techniques]

Postoperative incisional hernia is defined by 3 essential criteria, based on a perfect clinico-pathological knowledge of the abdominal wall: the site, dimensions, and defect. Two main elements predispose to incisional hernia: infection and mechanical factors. Local and systemic complications, accentuated in large incisional hernias, are respectively defined by two concepts: "incisional hernia lesion" and "incisional hernia disease". Precise assessment of these elements can guide the surgeon's operative strategy. Incisional hernias remain a relatively frequent complication of abdominal surgery. All of these patients generally require surgical repair of the abdominal wall. A French national survey showed that most surgeons now use prosthetic materials in 60% of primary repairs, and in 85% of recurrent cases. After reviewing the biomechanical characteristics and the in vivo behaviour of commercially available prostheses, the technical principles of prosthetic abdominal wall surgery will be considered together with the various implantation sites: retromuscular, intraperitoneal and premuscular. Based on their personal experience of 110 cases of large incisional hernias, treated between 1989 and 1998, the authors recommend the intraperitoneal position using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, a reliable material which is well tolerated in contact with the viscera.     

Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias.

A new method for repair of large hernias at stoma sites is presented. The old abdominal incision is reopened and prosthetic mesh is sutured in place aseptically. The bowel courses above the mesh to be secured to the lateral abdominal wall creating a flap valve. Seven paraostomy hernia repairs in six patients were performed with no recurrences in a 4- to 7-year follow-up. The peritoneal approach to insertion of prosthetic mesh into the hernia defect is recommended especially for recurrent paraostomy hernias. This technique is appropriate for a hernia that possesses a large fascial defect.     

猪切口疝模型的建立及使用生物型补片修补的研究

目的 建立小猪切口疝模型并探讨生物型疝补片在切口疝修补治疗中应用的可行性.方法 通过在小猪上腹部制作一个肌肉筋膜层缺损区的方法 建立切口疝模型,分别采用二期修补和一期修补的方式,使用生物型补片无张力修补切口疝.观察术后切口感染、疝复发等并发症及补片组织的病理学变化.结果 术后1周时可获得典型的切口疝模型;一期修补组未发生切口疝,二期修补组6只小猪成功,2只因切口感染、补片排出而失败.术后6个月内观察,生物补片的胶原变性吸收,逐渐被结缔组织所替代,大体上逐渐形成一致密结缔组织层并自体腱膜化.结论 本研究所采用的切口疝模型制作方法 成功率高、可重复性好.用生物型疝补片修补小猪切口疝可行,并预示着此生物补片可能是一种较为理想的腹外疝修补材料.     

Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair

Primary ventral hernias and ventral incisional hernias have been a challenge for surgeons throughout the ages. In the current era, incisional hernias have increased in prevalence due to the very high number of laparotomies performed in the 20 th century. Even though minimally invasive surgery and hernia repair have evolved rapidly, general surgeons have yet to develop the ideal, standardized method that adequately decreases common postoperative complications, such as wound failure, hernia recurrence and pain. The evolution of laparoscopy and ventral hernia repair will be reviewed, from the rectoscopy of the 4th century to the advent of laparoscopy, from suture repair to the evolution of mesh reinforcement. The nuances of minimally invasive ventral and incisional hernia repair will be summarized, from preoperative considerations to variations in intraoperative practice. New techniques have become increasingly popular, such as primary defect closure, retrorectus mesh placement, and concomitant component separation. The advent of robotics has made some of these repairs more feasible, but only time and well-designed clinical studies will tell if this will be a durable modality for ventral and incisional hernia repair.