Fifteen years of experience in predictive testing for Huntington disease at a single testing center in Victoria, Australia.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study describes 15 years of experience in predictive testing for Huntington disease at a single center in Victoria, Australia. METHOD: Data collected on 756 participants included age, gender, family history, prior risk and the age at which this risk became known, exposure to Huntington disease, number of children, and proximity to the testing center. RESULTS: Some 57.8% of participants were female, and 88.8% had a 50% risk of developing Huntington disease. The mean age at entry was 40.4 years and was gender-independent. Of all completed tests (n = 648), 37.5% gave high-risk results, and 3.2% were in the zone of reduced penetrance. The 14.3% who withdrew from testing tended to be younger and childless, lacked exposure to severe Huntington disease, and more often at 25% or less risk. Some 32.4% of candidates presented for testing within 1 year of becoming aware of their risk, and most of these individuals had little or no exposure to severe Huntington disease. Those whose exposure was considerable waited on average for more than 13 years. Among the most inexperienced candidates were a group of "adoptees" (raised away from their biological family). Maternal transmission was the source of risk for 19 of 20 adoptees. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the significance of exposure to Huntington disease and its impact on the timing of testing.     

Development of genomic reference materials for Huntington disease genetic testing

PurposeDiagnostic and predictive testing for Huntington disease requires an accurate measurement of CAG repeats in the HD (IT15) gene. However, precise repeat sizing can be technically challenging, and is complicated by the lack of quality control and reference materials (RM). The aim of this study was to characterize genomic DNA from 14 Huntington cell lines available from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Human Genetic Cell Repository at the Coriell Cell Repositories for use as reference materials for CAG repeat sizing.MethodsFourteen Huntington cell lines were selected for study. The alleles in these materials represent a large range of sizes that include important diagnostic cutoffs and allele combinations. The allele measurement study was conducted by ten volunteer laboratories using a variety of polymerase chain reaction-based in-house developed methods and by DNA sequence analysis.ResultsThe Huntington alleles in the 14 genomic DNA samples range in size from 15 to 100 CAG repeats. There was good agreement among the ten laboratories, and thus, the 95% confidence interval was small for each measurement. The allele size determined by DNA sequence analysis agreed with the laboratory developed tests.ConclusionThese DNA materials, which are available from Coriell Cell Repositories, will facilitate accurate and reliable Huntington genetic testing.     

Impact of genetic testing for Huntington disease on the family system

The psychological impact of DNA predictive testing on asymptomatic individuals at risk for Huntington disease (HD) has received considerable attention since the advent of the procedure in 1993. This study examined the impact of such testing on families from the families' perspective. Individuals asymptomatic at the time of testing, together with their families, were interviewed in their homes with a semi-structured interview. Eighteen families with a total of 55 individuals participated. Defining the family as the unit of analysis was consistent with Systems Theory that links interactions of individuals, families, and the social environment. Areas of affected family functioning noted by the respondents included: 1) family membership; 2) family patterns of communication; and 3) future care giving concerns as they influenced current relationships. Eighty-one percent of families experienced changes in family membership. Members in 50% of families experienced changes in patterns of communication, and 56% percent of persons reported changes in current relationships in response to test results and their implications for future caregiving. The data support the conclusion that genetic testing is a family, as opposed to an individual, matter and that family involvement in the decision making process should be strongly encouraged in order to help families adjust. The data imply that families will benefit in pre-test sessions from an examination of their patterns of dealing with illness issues, both past and present.     

The impact of predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: three years after testing.

BACKGROUND: To fully assess predictive genetic testing programs, it is important to assess outcomes over periods of time longer than the 1-year follow-up reported in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year study of individuals who received predictive genetic test results for previously identified familial mutations in Australian Familial Cancer Clinics. Questionnaires were sent before attendance at the familial cancer clinic and 2 weeks, 4 months, 1 year, and 3 years after receiving test results. Psychological measures were included each time, and preventive behaviors were assessed at baseline and 1 and 3 years. Psychological measures were adjusted for age, gender, and baseline score. RESULTS: The study included 19 carriers and 54 non-carriers. We previously reported an increase in mean cancer-specific distress in carriers at 2 weeks with a return to baseline levels by 12 months. This level was maintained until 3 years. Non-carriers showed sustained decreases after testing with a significantly lower level at 3 years compared with baseline (P < 0.001). These scores tended to be lower than those for carriers at 3 years (P = 0.09). Mean depression and anxiety scores did not differ between carriers and non-carriers and, at 3 years, were similar to baseline. All carriers and 7% of non-carriers had had a colonoscopy by 3 years, and 69% of 13 female carriers had undergone gynecological screening in the previous 2 years. Prophylactic surgery was rare. CONCLUSION: This report of long-term data indicates appropriate screening and improved psychological measures for non-carriers with no evidence of undue psychological distress in carriers of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer mutations.     

Experience over fifteen years with a protocol for predictive testing for Huntington disease

ObjectiveTo compile a comprehensive profile of the participants who had predictive testing from Huntington disease (HD) between 1994 and 2008 in Montreal, Canada.MethodThis is a retrospective cohort study. The predictive testing protocol consisted of a telephone interview to give information about predictive testing and collect demographic data; a psychological assessment and counseling session; a session focused on medical and family history of HD; a session reserved for genetic counseling; a session where results were given to participants; and a follow-up telephone interview.ResultsA total of 181 applicants requested presymptomatic testing. 135 applicants (77 women and 58 men) completed the protocol and received test results while 40 withdrew. Of the latter, 3 manifested symptoms of the disease and were referred to a neurologist or psychiatrist, and 3 had previously been tested by linkage analysis. Participants usually mentioned more than one reason for requesting predictive testing but the most frequent was to put an end to uncertainty concerning their risk of illness. The proportion of positive and negatives test results was 40% and 54.1% respectively, significantly different from the expected 50% (p < 0.01). Prenatal testing was not frequently requested.ConclusionAll the participants expressed satisfaction regarding their decision to be tested. None to our knowledge had a catastrophic reaction (major depressive disorder or psychiatric hospitalization, declared suicide attempt or suicide). Our study highlights that preparation for receiving test results is a psychologically complex process for which appropriate support in a timely fashion is critical. We feel that a cautious and ethical case by case approach remains essential and that high standards of testing should be maintained because of the far reaching impact of test results.     

Preimplantation genetic testing for Huntington disease and certain other dominantly inherited disorders

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on embryos from couples at risk for Huntington disease can achieve disease prevention in offspring without disclosure of parental genotype. This strategy may also be applicable to other extremely deleterious dominant traits.     

Predictive testing for inherited prion disease: report of 22 years experience

The inherited prion diseases (IPD) are a group of untreatable neurodegenerative diseases that segregate as autosomal dominant traits. Mutations in the prion protein gene (PRNP) were first found to be causal of IPD in 1989, before the molecular genetic characterisation of any other neurodegenerative disease. Predictive testing for IPD has subsequently been carried out at a single UK clinical and research centre for 22 years. We have analysed the uptake, consequences and factors influencing the decision for predictive testing over this period. In all, 104 predictive tests were done on individuals at 50% risk, compared with 135 positive diagnostic tests. Using genealogies from clinical records, we estimated that 23% of those at 50% risk have completed testing. There was no gender bias, and unsurprisingly, there was a slight excess of normal results because some patients were already partly through the risk period because of their age. An unexpectedly large number of patients developed symptoms shortly after predictive testing, suggesting that undisclosed early symptoms of disease may prompt some patients to come forward for predictive testing. Fifteen per cent of predictive tests were done >10 years after molecular diagnosis in a proband. A strong determinant of the timing of testing in these patients was a second diagnosis in the family. IPD may generate infectious prions that might be transmitted by surgical procedures; however, we found no evidence that public health information influenced decisions about predictive testing.     

The choice not to undergo genetic testing for Huntington disease: Results from the PHAROS study

Rates of genetic testing in Huntington disease (HD) are lower than was predicted before direct DNA testing became available. Clinicians often do not have in-depth conversations with people at risk who chose not to test. We queried 733 research subjects who chose not to learn their HD gene status when enrolling in the Prospective Huntington At-Risk Observational Study, carried out between 1999 and 2008. Lack of an effective cure or treatment (66% of subjects) and inability to undo knowledge (66%) were the major reasons cited for choosing not to undergo HD DNA testing. Most subjects were not concerned about the length or burden of the testing process (61% and 59%, respectively). Subjects were optimistic that a treatment to improve symptoms or postpone onset would be developed within the next 10 years (56% and 53%, respectively), but they had less certainty about the prospects to prevent HD onset (36%). This is the first large, systematic study of why people at risk for HD choose not to undergo genetic testing. Attitudes about how people at risk for HD approach this life-altering choice should be reassessed as new treatments develop, and as clinical trials now require genetic testing at entry.     

Predictive testing for Huntington disease in a developing country

Predictive testing for Huntington disease (HD), by means of direct mutation analysis, has been offered at the Division of Human Genetics, University of Cape Town, from 1995. The aim of this study was to compile a comprehensive profile of the participants who had undergone predictive testing in the Western Cape from 1995 to 2005. The sociodemographic data, uptake and outcome of tests were analyzed to inform changes to improve the current genetic counseling services. A retrospective cross-sectional design using a 'multi-method' approach of both qualitative and quantitative methods was used. Data were gathered from the participants' hospital files and genetic database. Psychosocial data were obtained by face-to-face interviews with the participants in their homes or venues of choice. A total of 36 predictive tests were performed. The uptake for predictive testing was approximately 4.5% of the estimated at-risk population. The cohort of 27 individuals comprised 16 females and 11 males. Their mean age was 35.3 years; 6 were mixed ancestry and 21 were White people (European ancestry); 11 tested gene positive, 15 gene negative and 1 was in the reduced penetrance range. The most important issue identified was that the uptake of individuals classified as mixed ancestry was substantially lower than that of the White people possibly due to limited access to the predictive testing program because of the low levels of income and education in the general population of families with HD. Strategies to address these aspects have been incorporated into the program and will be reassessed after 1 year.     

Psychological impact of news of genetic risk for Huntington disease.

A one-year longitudinal study was conducted investigating the psychological effects of the news of genetic testing for the Huntington disease (HD) gene. Participants were assessed at baseline (before obtaining news of test results) and at three, six, and 12 months after test results on stress-specific symptom measures. Among carriers of the HD gene, a considerable number (55%) showed evidence of neurological impairment at baseline, indicative of HD. Also noteworthy, these individuals had significantly higher psychological symptom scores at baseline than carriers without neurological impairment or noncarriers. Despite this, these individuals were no more aware of their carrier status at baseline than carriers without HD symptoms or noncarriers. Furthermore, the psychological symptom levels of HD carriers with neurological impairment remained elevated across the follow-up assessments. Results for noncarriers and carriers without HD neurological symptoms were consistent with the findings of previous studies indicating that news of genetic testing for the HD gene had limited detrimental impact. The clinical implications of the results are discussed.     

Attitudes toward presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease

One hundred thirty-one individuals at 50% risk of inheriting Huntington disease (HD) responded to a survey to study their attitudes toward taking a genetic test based on the identification of a genetically linked DNA polymorphism. Ninety-six percent of the respondents believe that presymptomatic testing should be available, and 66% say they will use it themselves. Fewer married individuals, in comparison to those single, separated, and divorced, intend to take the test. Many respondents (40%) said their primary reason for wanting to be tested is to end the uncertainty in their lives. Results suggest that there will be self-selection in test use, with many individuals who believe they will be depressed or possibly suicidal with a positive test result deciding not to be tested or unsure about testing. However, 15% of those who want to be tested acknowledge that they may be at risk for suicide if they are probable gene carriers. Only 12% of all respondents say they will be likely to use prenatal testing, suggesting that initial demand may be low in New England. Implementation of presymptomatic testing challenges health care providers to develop strategies to care for otherwise healthy persons who will be given a diagnosis years before the onset of illness.     

Dilemmas of anonymous predictive testing for Huntington disease: Privacy vs. optimal care

Some persons at risk for Huntington disease (HD) seek predictive testing under the protection of anonymity to reduce the risk of insurance discrimination for themselves and their families. While Canadian and European health care systems seem to limit insurance discrimination to life and disability insurance, U.S. residents do not have national health insurance and are concerned about health insurance discrimination. Two persons residing outside Canada requested predictive testing anonymously. Their primary reason for doing so was to avoid the risks of medical insurance discrimination. After a detailed preparatory session and agreement to counselling and to receipt of results in person, we agreed to provide anonymous testing to these persons. One participant, whose psychological assessment was unremarkable, coped well with the predictive testing process and did not have the CAG expansion. The other participant had considerable emotional problems prior to testing, which necesitated postponement of discussion of results and referral for psychiatric assessment and support. Both participants had difficulty maintaining anonymity. The provision of anonymous predictive testing raises several problems. With anonymous testing, clinicians cooperate with participants to exclude insurance companies from information. This may invalidate the contract with insurance companies. A policy response by insurance companies or a universal health care system to protect individuals is preferable. Individuals who request anonymous testing may be precisely those most vulnerable and in need of additional support and counselling. However, the preservation of anonymity is a burden to participants and may frustrate the clinicians' ability to establish rapport in counselling and to provide appropriate follow-up typically available through genetic counselling in predictive testing programs. Am. J. Med. Genet. 71:197–201, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.