Clinical characteristics and medium-term prognosis of patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function. Do they differ in systolic dysfunction?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence, clinical profile and medium-term prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic ventricular function compared to those with systolic dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 153 patients were included, 62 with preserved systolic ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction > or = 45%) and 91 with impaired systolic ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%). The mean follow-up period was 25 10 months. RESULTS: Mean age was similar (66 10 vs. 65 10; p = 0.54). There was a higher proportion of women among patients with preserved systolic function (53% vs. 28%; p < 0.01). Ischemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathy were the most common causes of heart failure in patients with systolic dysfunction, whereas valvular disease and hypertensive cardiopathy were the most common in patients with preserved systolic function. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers were more often prescribed in patients with impaired systolic ventricular function (86% vs. 52%; p < 0.01 and 33% vs. 11%; p < 0.01, respectively). There were no differences between the groups in terms of mortality rate (37% vs. 29%), readmission rate for other causes (29% vs. 23%), readmission rate for heart failure (45% vs. 45%), cumulative survival (51% vs. 62%) and the likelihood of not being readmitted for heart failure (50% vs. 52%). In the multivariate analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction was not a predictor of death or readmission because of heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: In a large proportion of patients with heart failure, systolic ventricular function is preserved. Despite the clinical differences between patients with preserved and impaired systolic ventricular function, the medium-term prognosis was similar in both groups.     

Poor concordance of commonly used echocardiographic measures of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with suspected heart failure but preserved systolic function: is there a reliable echocardiographic measure of diastolic dysfunction?

Objective: To determine the concordance of different Doppler echocardiographic criteria for “diastolic dysfunction” in patients with suspected heart failure but preserved left ventricular systolic function.     

Is heart failure with preserved systolic function an overlooked enigma?

Heart failure with preserved systolic function, or diastolic heart failure, represents the neglected other half of the pandemic of heart failure. Unlike previously held beliefs, diastolic heart failure carries with it the same connotation of morbidity and mortality as systolic heart failure, particularly in the elderly. Due to lack of standards in application of the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure, studies are difficult to interpret due to heterogeneity in the clinical criteria applied to the patient enrollment. It is imperative that preventive efforts be implemented in high-risk groups, and screening measures with newer biomarkers be considered for identifying underlying structural heart disease in order to employ preventive therapy early in the course of illness. No evidence-based therapeutic strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality has been established, even after the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure is manifest. Current therapy targets lusitropic abnormalities in the realm of impaired relaxation, abnormal diastolic compliance, avoidance of tachycardia, and restoration of atrial booster pump function. Outcomes-based placebocontrolled clinical trials are currently underway to define appropriate therapeutic strategies in diastolic heart failure.     

What mechanisms underlie diastolic dysfunction in heart failure?

Abnormalities of diastolic function are common to virtually all forms of cardiac failure. However, their underlying mechanisms, precise role in the generation and phenotypic expression of heart failure, and value as specific therapeutic targets remain poorly understood. A growing proportion of heart failure patients, particularly among the elderly, have apparently preserved systolic function, and this is fueling interest for better understanding and treating diastolic abnormalities. Much of the attention in clinical and experimental studies has focused on relaxation and filling abnormalities of the heart, whereas chamber stiffness has been less well studied, particularly in humans. Nonetheless, new insights from basic and clinical research are helping define the regulators of diastolic dysfunction and illuminate novel targets for treatment. This review puts these developments into perspective with the major aim of highlighting current knowledge gaps and controversies.     

Is depression a problem in patients with chronic heart failure?

Depression is a common psychiatric disorder, characterized by a persistent lowering of mood, loss of interest in routine activities and diminished ability to experience pleasure. There are several depression classification systems and diagnostic tools based on clinical symptoms, i.e. the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Montgomery-Asberg Scale and Beck's Depression Inventory. Depression frequently occurs in patients with heart failure, as similar pathophysiological mechanisms of neurohormonal activation, arrhythmia, inflammation and hypercoagulation are present in both these diseases. Prognosis in patients with depression is also affected by insufficient cooperation between a patient and his doctor as regards the lifestyle and medication intake of a patient. Depression is usually accompanied by remission and relapse periods which might be related to the current heart failure status of a patient and despite intensive medical treatment they may recur. Depression is often difficult to diagnose or even left undiagnosed and thus untreated, because its symptoms: fatigue, apathy and decreased exercise tolerance, are common in the general population. Furthermore, safety and efficacy of antidepressant therapy in patients with cardiovascular diseases are not well established. Evidence from clinical trials evaluating the influence of depression behavioral and pharmacological treatment on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure is also limited. Taking into account that depression affects prognosis in patients with variety of disorders and common pathological mechanisms present both in depression and heart failure, screening tests for depression should be considered not only in patients with diagnosed heart failure but also those at risk of heart failure development.     

Is hydrotherapy an appropriate form of exercise for elderly patients with biventricular systolic heart failure?

Hydrotherapy (exercise in warm water) is considered to be a safe and beneficial method to use in the rehabilitation of stable heart failure patients, but there is little information on the effect of the increased venous return and enhanced preload in elderly patients with biventricular heart failure. We present a case report of an elderly man who was recruited to participate in a hydrotherapy study. We compared echocardiographic data during warm water immersion with land measurements, and observed increases in stroke volume from 32 mL (land) to 42 mL (water), left ventricular ejection fraction from 22 to 24%, left ventricular systolic velocity from 4.8 to 5.0 cm/s and left atrioventricular plane displacement from 2.1 to 2.2 mm. In opposite, right ventricular systolic velocity decreases from 11.2 to 8.4 cm/s and right atrioventricular plane displacement from 8.1 to 4.7 mm. The tricuspid pressure gradient rose from 18 mmHg on land to 50 mmHg during warm water immersion. Thus, although left ventricular systolic function was relatively unaffected during warm water immersion, we observed a decrease in right ventricular function with an augmented right ventricular pressure. We recommend further investigation to observe the cardiac effect of warm water immersion on patients with biventricular systolic heart failure and at risk of elevated right ventricular pressure.