National survey of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the haemodialysis population of the UK population.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopoenia (HIT) type II is an antibody-mediated, drug-induced thrombocytopenia which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several case reports and small series have described the occurrence of HIT type II in the haemodialysis population and the challenges associated with it. Some of these reports raise the possibility of a recent increase in prevalence of this condition. But to date, there has never been a large study to estimate the prevalence, demography or treatment options for this syndrome in the haemodialysis population. METHODS: The renal units in the UK were surveyed to establish the prevalence of HIT type II syndrome in the haemodialysis population. Demographic data for haemodialysis patients with HIT type II syndrome were gathered and current treatments assessed. RESULTS: Fifty responses from the 81 UK renal units surveyed were received. The combined population for these units was 13 682 patients on dialysis of whom 10 564 were on maintenance haemodialysis. The prevalence and incidence of HIT type II syndrome in the UK haemodialysis population were 0.26 and 0.32 per 100 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients with HIT type II syndrome was 62 years (range 22-86), 52% were females and 92% were Caucasians. Only 17% of patients have had complications of HIT syndrome. Thirty-six percent of renal units use danaparoid as anticoagulant of choice for patients on haemodialysis with HIT type II syndrome. CONCLUSION: This is the largest survey of HIT type II in the haemodialysis population to date. The prevalence is considerably lower (0.26 per 100 patients) than previous estimates, with only a minority of patients developing complications of the condition. Haemodialysis patients with HIT type II in the UK are predominantly treated with danaparoid.     

The influence of hepatitis C and iron replacement therapy on plasma pentosidine levels in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease and intravenous (i.v.) iron therapy can enhance oxidative stress. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and i.v. iron administration on oxidative stress in chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: A total of 115 HD patients (47% males, age 47 +/- 13 years) were placed in two groups according to the presence (HCV(+)) or absence (HCV(-)) of serum antibodies against HCV. Plasma pentosidine, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were measured. The patients were also analysed according to the tertiles of serum levels of ferritin: group 1 (ferritin <380 ng/ml), group 2 (ferritin 380-750 ng/ml) and group 3 (ferritin >750 ng/ml). The cumulative iron dose was recorded during 6 months prior to the study. RESULTS: HCV(+) patients had significantly higher levels of plasma pentosidine and ALT than HCV(-) patients. Age, gender, serum albumin, IL-6 and hsCRP did not differ according to HCV serology. The levels of pentosidine were related to the ferritin levels and were significantly higher in group 3 compared with group 1. Moreover, the cumulative dose of iron was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 1. Plasma pentosidine showed a positive correlation with age, HCV and ferritin. In a stepwise backward multiple regression model, age and HCV were independent predictors of pentosidine levels. CONCLUSION: HCV in HD patients is associated with increased pentosidine levels, possibly reflecting increased oxidative stress. The association between pentosidine and ferritin levels may suggest an impact of i.v. iron therapy.     

Hepatitis C virus--does it penetrate the haemodialysis membrane?: PCR analysis of haemodialysis ultrafiltrate and whole blood

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission to haemodialysis patientsoccurs by a route which remains to be clarified. Most studiesshow a significant correlation between anti-HCV-seropositivityand the number of blood transfusions or the duration of dialysisrespectively. However, even in patients who have not receiveda blood transfusion the prevalence of HCV infection was significantlyhigher than in controls. We studied 58 patients on regular haemodialysisusing a second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA II) followed by a second-generation recombinant immunosorbentassay (RIBA II) for HCV. For all antibody-positive or indeterminatepatients, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was doneusing both whole blood and dialysed ultrafiltrate. We were ableto show by PCR that no HCV RNA (cells or cell particles) passedthrough the dialysis membranes.     

Travel-associated acquisition of hepatitis C virus infection in patients receiving haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance haemodialysis may lack HCV antibody (anti-HCV) despite chronic HCV viraemia. This carries important implications for the design of surveillance policies. METHODS: To characterize the prevalence of antibody-negative/RNA-positive HCV infection, patients attending seven haemodialysis units underwent anti-HCV testing using a third-generation assay and HCV RNA testing using real-time PCR. RESULTS: At screening, anti-HCV prevalence was 12/360 (3.3%; 95% CI 1.7-5.8%); 7/12 (58.3%) anti-HCV positive samples were HCV RNA positive. Among anti-HCV-negative samples, 2/348 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.2-2.1%) tested HCV RNA positive (genotype 1a). Retrospective testing of stored sera dated the infections to a period of holiday in the Indian subcontinent. The two infections were unrelated by HCV-NS5B sequencing. Only one of the two newly infected persons showed raised transaminases. Both developed anti-HCV within 8-13 weeks of follow-up. Prospective surveillance of travellers to resource-limited countries returning to the units showed a HCV incidence of 4/153 travel episodes (2.6%; 95% CI 0.7-6.6%) among 131 persons (3.1%; 95% CI 0.8-7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Among haemodialysis patients in the United Kingdom, antibody-negative/RNA-positive HCV status is associated with newly acquired infection, rather than lack of antibody responses in chronic HCV infection. There is a significant risk of HCV infection associated with travel to resource-limited countries. Given that transaminase levels may be normal, HCV RNA testing is recommended in patients re-entering a dialysis unit following haemodialysis in settings where suboptimal infection control policies pose a risk of exposure to blood-borne viruses.     

Impact of dialysis room and reuse strategies on the incidence of hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis units

Background: Despite the advent of screening of blood productsfor anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV), the incidence of HCV infectionamong haemodialysis (HD) patients is alarmingly high and suggeststransmission within the HD unit. To analyse trends in the prevalenceand incidence of HCV infection, and evaluate the impact of dialysisroom and reuse policies on the incidence of HCV infection, ahospital survey instrument was sent out to medical directorsof all 71 HD units in Portugal in August 1994. Information forthe years 1991, 1992 and 1993 was requested with respect toHCV infection, defined as positive anti-HCV test. Sixty-twoof 71 units (87%) treating 4232 patients in 1993 responded.Overall, data from 5774 patient-years were available for analyses.Observations over multiple intervals were pooled into a singlesample, and pooled logistic regression was used to evaluatethe relationship between risk factors/strategies and incidenceof HCV infection. By 1993, regular anti-HCV testing of patientsand staff was practised by 98% and 82% of units, respectively.There was a significant decline in the incidence of HCV infectionfrom 9.9% in 1991 to 5.7% in 1992 and 5.1% in 1993. The incidencewas directly related to the prevalence in the dialysis unit.Units with a prevalence of less than 19% had an annual incidenceof 2.5% compared to a 35.3% incidence in units with a prevalencegreater than 60%. There was a wide variation in the incidenceof HCV infection in HD units across the country, with geographicallocation, unit ownership and socioeconomic factors playing asignificant role. The incidence was lowest among units that:(i) were located in the northern regions of the country; (ii)were private hospitalbased units; and (iii) used dedicated machinesor separate rooms for anti-HCV-positive patients. The incidenceamong units that reprocessed dialysers (6.1%) was not significantlydifferent from that among units that did not reprocess dialysers(7.4%). However, among units that did reprocess dialysers, theincidence of HCV infection was lowest in: (i) units that usedseparate rooms for reprocessing dialysers from anti-HCV-positivepatients or did not reprocess these dialysers; and (ii) unitsthat used Renalin as the sterilant. These results suggest thetransmission of HCV infection in HD units and that use of dedicatedmachines and isolation of anti-HCV-positive patients and theirdialysers may reduce the incidence of HCV infection.     

Prevention of hepatitis C infection in haemodialysis units. A prospective study

A prospective study was begun in our haemodialysis unit afterfour previously negative patients were found to be anti-HCVpositive. A dedicated area and dedicated dialysis equipment(but not a separate room) were assigned to anti-HCV-positivepatients and testing for HCV antibodies was performed every3 months. A total of 131 patients were treated during the studyperiod of 18 months. Of these, 50 patients were dialysed duringthe entire 18 months, and 21 were available to be tested sixor more months after having left the centre. During the first6 weeks after implementing the precautions two more anti-HCV-positivepatients were detected. However, during the rest of the studyperiod no further newly infected patients were found. It isconcluded that the spread of HCV infection in a haemodialysisenvironment can be prevented by limited isolation procedures.     

手卫生改进任重道远

目的探讨手卫生工作现状和改进策略。方法分析国内外手卫生发展现状,总结我国手卫生工作发展的基础与策略。结果手卫生法规逐步规范,手卫生设施不断完善,医务人员对手卫生的认知不断提升和依从性不断提高,手卫生工作的调查研究不断深入。结论我国手卫生工作发展迅速,取得了重要进展,为今后手卫生工作奠定了良好的基础;但与保障患者安全的要求有一定的距离,手卫生工作面临着巨大的挑战,任重道远。     

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B exposure and antibodies against the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was assessed in 86 haemodialysis patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) using the commercial radioimmunoassay and ortho HCV ELISA assay. Of the 86 patients included in the study, 42 were male with a mean age of 44.9 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.4 years. Forty-four were female with a mean age of 48.4 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.3 years. Hepatitis B exposure was 57% and 12.8% of haemodialysis patients were positive for HBsAg, whereas 39.8% of patients were positive for anti-HCV. There was a significant correlation ( P =0.00007) between anti-HCV positivity and the length of time on haemodialysis. However, there was no significant correlation found between the number of blood transfusions received and anti-HCV positivity. There was also no significant correlation found between HBsAg and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positivity and the number of blood transfusions or the length of time on haemodialysis, nor between hepatitis B and C exposure and elevated aminotransferase levels.     

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

SUMMARY: The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B exposure and antibodies against the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was assessed in 86 haemodialysis patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) using the commercial radioimmunoassay and ortho HCV ELISA assay. of the 86 patients included in the study, 42 were male with a mean age of 44.9 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.4 years. Forty-four were female with a mean age of 48.4 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.3 years. Hepatitis B exposure was 57% and 12.8% of haemodialysis patients were positive for HBsAg, whereas 39.8% of patients were positive for anti-HCV. There was a significant correlation ( P = 0.00007) between anti-HCV positivity and the length of time on haemodialysis. However, there was no significant correlation found between the number of blood transfusions received and anti-HCV positivity. There was also no significant correlation found between HBsAg and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positivity and the number of blood transfusions or the length of time on haemodialysis, nor between hepatitis B and C exposure and elevated aminotransferase levels.     

TT virus infection in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: The recent discovery of a new parenterally transmitted DNA virus called TT virus (TTV) led us to investigate its prevalence in haemodialysis patients, a high-risk group for blood-borne infection, and to evaluate its role in liver disease. Moreover, we compared the TTV prevalence with the prevalence of other hepatitis virus coinfections. METHODS: Serum samples of 78 patients on maintenance haemodialysis were tested for TTV-DNA, hepatitis G virus (HGV)-RNA, anti-E2, anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HCV-RNA. TTV-DNA was detected by semi-nested PCR using the primers from open reading frame 1 (ORF). HGV-RNA was detected by PCR using specific primers for the NS3 and the 5'-UTR genome regions while anti-E2 were checked by an enzyme immunological test. Anti-HCV was tested by the second generation Chiron RIBA HCV test system. HCV-RNA was evaluated by nested PCR with primers directed to the highly conserved 5' non-coding region of the HCV genome. RESULTS: TTV prevalence in our patients was 19% (15/78) while the prevalence of HCV and HGV infection proved to be 20 and 15.4%, respectively. Among TTV positive patients HGV co-infection was present in five cases (33%), HCV in six cases (39.9%), while HBV co-infection was not present in any of the patients. Only three patients proved positive for all three viruses. ALT levels were normal in most cases (13/15; 86%). In particular, patients with TTV infection alone showed normal ALT levels and HCV coinfection was found in the two patients with moderate ALT increases. CONCLUSIONS: TTV prevalence in haemodialysed patients is significant though the real clinical impact is still unclear. However, we must keep in mind that the epidemiological relevance of TTV infection is probably underestimated due to the impossibility in detecting the corresponding antibody.     

Risk of death and liver cirrhosis in anti-HCV-positive long-term haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in haemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of HCV infection on patient survival in a cohort of long-term haemodialysis patients and to evaluate the percentage of anti-HCV-positive patients that evolve to liver cirrhosis. METHODS: In 1992, 175 patients who had been on intermittent haemodialysis therapy for at least 6 months were included in the study (57 anti-HCV-positive and 118 anti-HCV-negative patients). Evaluation of patient outcome included date and cause of death, kidney transplantation, and the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Patient survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the risk of death among dialysis patients who were anti-HCV positive. Other prognostic variables studied included age, gender, diabetes mellitus as cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), history of previous transplant, transplantation during follow-up, and time on haemodialysis treatment. The diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was made based on clinical and/or histological criteria. RESULTS: Eight-year patient survival in anti-HCV-positive subjects was lower (32%) than in anti-HCV-negative patients (52%) (log-rank, P=0.03). Four variables were found to be independent prognostic factors in patient survival: age (relative risk (RR) 1.04); diabetes as cause of ESRD (RR 3.6); transplantation during follow-up (RR 0.66) and presence of HCV antibodies (RR 1.62). The causes of death did not differ significantly between groups, except that four anti-HCV-positive patients died from liver disease. Ten (17.5%) of the 57 anti-HCV-positive patients were diagnosed to have liver cirrhosis at a median of 10 years after renal replacement therapy initiation and a median of 7 years after the first ALT level increase. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study shows an increased risk of death among long-term haemodialysis patients infected with HCV compared with non-infected patients. This might be partly explained by the high proportion of these patients that evolve to liver cirrhosis.     

Improving hand hygiene in a low‐resource setting: A nurse‐led quality improvement project

Hand hygiene is a simple but often ignored practice in health care systems worldwide, but it is integral for nosocomial infection prevention, with many hospital‐acquired infections being linked to inadequate hand hygiene practice. At the burns unit in Kamuzu Central Hospital, 50% of patients were found to have acquired pseudomonas infections: one of the contributing factors being inadequate hand hygiene. This quality improvement project was part of a course for nurses to introduce change for patient benefit, with the aim of increasing the baseline figures for hand hygiene practices and hand hygiene facilities from 37% and 22%, respectively (baseline collected in November 2019). Using robust, standard quality improvement processes, measures were put in place such as checklists to observe hand hygiene compliance and facilities, appointment of a hand hygiene committee who monitored and sustained activities of the project, procurement and distribution of handrub and placement of hand‐washing buckets and soap at strategic points. The project saw an increase in availability of hand‐washing facilities to 95.6% and hand hygiene practices increase to >80% within 6 months. The project demonstrates that low cost interventions, led by nurses, can make a real difference to practice in resource poor countries.     

普通外科医务人员手卫生认知和依从性调查与分析

目的：调查《医务人员手卫生规范》实施后,普外病区医务人员手卫生认知与依从性执行情况,为改进手卫生工作提供依据。方法通过问卷调查和现场观察的方法,对普通外科156名工作人员其手卫生认知与依从性执行情况进行调查。结果在不同岗位和工作区域的工作人员中,监护室护士手卫生认知和依从性最高,保洁人员最差,接触患者前手卫生依从性最差。结论手卫生认知与依从性和相关理论知识的培训、执行力度的监督及医护人员自身的重视度、责任心相关。     

The changing epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in haemodialysis: European multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in HD patients has been known since the early 1990s but its evolution over the last decade is poorly documented. METHODS: All chronic HD patients from 15 Belgian units were tested at (re)start of HD and every 18 months for anti-HCV antibodies (ELISA 2 in May 1991 and November 1992, then ELISA 3 until May 2000). All chronic HD patients from HD units from eight other European countries, whose prevalence of anti-HCV (+) patients had been studied in 1991-1994 (and published except in one country), were tested for anti-HCV antibodies in 1999. RESULTS: Anti-HCV (+) prevalence decreased (P<0.001) from 13.5 (1991) to 6.8% (2000) in the Belgian cohort (n = 1710). Prevalence also decreased (P<0.05) in the participating units from France (42-30%), Sweden (16-9%) and Italy (28-16%), tended to decrease in the participating units from UK (7-3%, P = 0.058) and Hungary (26-15%, P = 0.057) but did not change (NS) in the participating units from Germany (7 to 6%), Spain (5 to 12%) and Poland (42 to 44%). In the Belgian cohort, the prevalence of anti-HCV(+) at (re)start of HD did not change significantly over 1991-2000. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anti-HCV(+) in HD has decreased markedly over the last decade in the participating units from most European countries. This decrease should reduce further the risk of nosocomial and occupational HCV infection in HD and ultimately contribute to improved long-term prognosis of HD patients and kidney graft recipients.     

Efficacy and tolerance of interferon-alpha(2b) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis patients. Pre- and post-renal transplantation assessment.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents an important problem for the dialysis population due to its high prevalence and the long-term development of chronic liver disease, particularly following renal transplantation. METHODS: In order to assess the efficacy and tolerance of interferon (IFN) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in haemodialysis (HD) patients and their clinical course following renal transplantation, a multicentre, randomized, open-label study was conducted to compare IFN therapy vs a control group. RESULTS: Nineteen HCV RNA-positive patients received 3 x 10(6) U of IFN s.c., three times a week (post-HD), and 17 HCV RNA-positive patients were assigned to the control group. Tolerance to IFN therapy was good in nine patients, while treatment was discontinued in the other 10 due to the occurrence of side effects. HCV RNA was negative at the end of treatment in 14 out of 19 patients (74%) receiving IFN and in one patient (5%) in the control group. Six out of the 14 patients who initially responded to IFN therapy had a virological relapse (43%). Eight patients (42%) remained HCV RNA-negative, three of them until the day that renal transplantation (RT) was performed (7, 12 and 27 months, respectively), as did five patients on HD during the follow-up (27+/-5 months). Eight out of the nine patients (89%) who completed therapy were HCV RNA-negative at the end of treatment, and seven of them (78%) remained HCV RNA-negative during the follow-up on dialysis (21+/-8 months). Mean transaminase (ALT) values were significantly decreased following IFN therapy, while no changes were observed during the follow-up period in the control group. Fifteen patients (10 in the treatment group and five in the control group) underwent RT. Three patients in the treatment group were HCV RNA-negative at RT, and one of them had a virological relapse 20 months after RT, while the other two remained HCV RNA-negative at 3 months and 24 months after RT, respectively. In contrast to the control group, transaminase (ALT) remained within normal limits in all patients in the treatment group. Finally, during the post-RT follow-up, the transaminase mean values were significantly lower in treated patients vs patients in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the biochemical and virological response to IFN therapy is good in HD patients. In addition, IFN therapy appears to exert a beneficial effect on the course of liver disease following RT, regardless of the virological response. Despite the fact that IFN therapy was discontinued in 10 out of the 19 patients due to the occurrence of side effects, these disappeared following discontinuation of therapy. Therefore, IFN therapy is advisable for HCV-infected dialysis patients who are candidates for RT.     

Incidence of and risk factors for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection among haemodialysis and CAPD patients: evidence for environmental transmission

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) serum markers (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc)and antihepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) were prospectively followedin haemodialysis and CAPD patients. From January 1987 to January1990, 185 patients on haemodialysis and 124 on CAPD were analysed.Among patients susceptible to HBV (69 on haemodialysis and 70on CAPD), there were 17 HBsAg seroconversions on haemodialysis(0.19/patient-year) and 1 on CAPD (0.01/patient-year). A Coxproportional hazards model showed that haemodialysis treatmentwas the only risk factor significantly associated with HBV infection,thus suggesting transmission through the environment. Regarding hepatitis C, 83 anti-HCV-negative patients on haemodialysisand 46 on CAPD were followed. There were 18 seroconversionson haemodialysis (0.15/patient-year) and two seroconversionson CAPD (0.03/patient-year). Haemodialysis treatment was alsothe only risk factor significantly associated with a higherrisk of HCV infection. The hazard ratio for HCV infection inhaemodialysis patients was 5.7 compared to CAPD patients. Nevertheless,for one patient on CAPD treatment transfusions were the onlypossible source of HCV infection. In conclusion, both viruses were transmitted mainly throughthe haemodialysis environment, but the role of transfusionscould not be excluded.     

Antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) and transaminase concentration in chronic haemodialysis patients: a study with second-generation assays

We used first- and second-generation assays such as Ortho I,Ortho 2 and 4-RIBA to define prevalence and nsk factors foranti-HCV antibodies in haemodialysed patients. Forty-nine (24%)subjects were found to be anti-HCV positive. Anti-HCV positivity was related to duration of dialysis and past or currentelevations of GOT and GPT; the frequency of transfused patientswas greater in HCV-positive than in HCV-negative subjects; therewere 31 patients (pre valence of 20%) with anti-HCV antibodiesamong non-transfused patients. These findings show that, testedby second-generation assays, HCV infection is detected morethan twice as commonly in haemodia lysis patients and may beresponsible for a significant proportion of liver disease inthis clinical setting Acquisition of hepatitis C virus by dialysispatients is not only through blood transfusions but also secondaryto hepatitis C virus presence within the unit itself.     

A registry of haemodialysis patients and the progress of haemodialysis services in Lithuania.

Background. Until 1990, haemodialysis (HD) in Lithuania wasunderdeveloped, but after independence, development of HD started.Until 1996, no precise data about HD patients in Lithuania wereavailable. In order to create a registry of HD, we started tocollect data about dialysis services and HD patients in 1996.Every collection of data was followed by distribution and discussionof the results within the nephrological community. This studydescribes the changes of Lithuanian HD between 1996–2002. Methods. Between 1996 till 2002 all HD centres in Lithuaniawere annually visited and data were collected about all HD patients(response rate of 100%). The evaluation of the results duringour observational study was made according to the European BestPractice Guidelines. During annual conferences for nephrologists,the guidelines and data of our HD registry were presented. Results. There was an increase in the number of HD stations(from 25 p.m.p. to 75 p.m.p., P<0.001), in HD patients (from60 p.m.p. to 237 p.m.p., P<0.001) and in the incidence ofnew HD patients (from 54.3 p.m.p. to 103 p.m.p., P<0.01).The mean age of HD patients increased from 47.2±16.1years in 1996 to 56.0±14.9 in 2002 (P<0.001). Themain underlying cause of ESRD was chronic glomerulonephritis,but its rate decreased from 54.5% in 1996 to 27.5% in 2002 (P<0.001).The percentage of diabetics increased from 7.1% to 16.4%, P<0.05,and in hypertensive nephropathy from 3.1% to 10.9%, P<0.05.We observed improvement of the quality of HD in Lithuania duringthese 5 years. The percentage of patients on bicarbonate HDincreased from 7.1% in 1996 to 100% in 2002 (P<0.001). Thepercentage of patients receiving more than 12 h HD/week increasedfrom 30.8% in 1996 to 53.5% in 2002 (P<0.001). The mean Kt/Vin 1999 was 0.81±0.53, but it increased in 2002 to 1.22±0.27,P<0.001. In 2002, 84.6% of all HD patients were examinedfor HB_sAg, 82.3% for anti–HCV, 31.2% for anti-HB_s and57.1% for anti-HB_c. The percentage of patients receiving phosphatebinders increased from 65.2% in 1996 to 84.4% in 1997 and 90.5%in 2002. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were measuredin 27.3% of HD patients in 1999 but in 85.2% of patients in2002. The mean haemoglobin (Hb) concentration increased from92±15.4 g/l to 105±14.7 g/l; the percentage ofpatients with Hb>100 g/l increased from 27.5% to 64% in 2001.The percentage of HD patients receiving epoetin was 94.6% in2001 as compared with 78% in 1997. There was a marked increasein the use of intravenous iron (from 7.5% patients in 1997 to70.8% in 2000). The mean weekly dose of Epo was lower in HDpatients receiving intravenous iron than in patients receivingoral iron. Conclusions. Over the period of 1996–2002 the HD servicessignificantly expanded in Lithuania. The introduction of EuropeanBest Practice Guidelines and the establishment of a HD registrywith feedback of the results stimulated the significant progressin the quality of HD and in the management of the patients.