宫颈癌及其前期病变HPV感染与基因型分布

目的了解宫颈癌及宫颈上皮内瘤变CIN患者的HPV的感染和其基因分型及主要感染型别情况。方法应用型特异PCR检测宫颈癌及其前病变的患者的HPV感染及其主要基因分型情况的分析。结果在本研究宫颈癌及宫颈上皮内瘤变患者中,宫颈癌的HPV感染率为91．0％,CINⅠ／Ⅱ／Ⅲ的HPV感染率为73．3％,主要高危型HPV基因型别依次为HPV16、HPV18、HPV58、HPV33。结论在宫颈上皮内瘤变患者中感染主要高危型HPV基因型别依次为HPV16、HPV18、HPV58、HPV33、HPV16在宫颈癌和CIN中的构成比随着宫颈病变的增加而明显增加。     

134例宫颈上皮内瘤变患者HPV分型检测结果分析

目的探讨宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)中不同类型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的感染及分型情况。方法回顾性研究北京军区总医院妇科门诊134例已经确诊的CIN患者,采用凯普的核酸分子快速导流杂交基因芯片技术对HPV进行分型。结果 1.各级别CIN以HPV高危亚型单一或者多重感染为主;2.在HPV阳性的101例患者中,单一感染者73例(72.28%),双重感染者24例(23.76%),三重感染者3例(2.97%),四重感染者1例(0.99%);3.HPV-16、58感染率最高,分别为30.83%,24.06%。结论 HPV感染以高危型和多重感染为主;随CIN级别的增高,HPV阳性率也是增高的;HPV-16亚型的感染率最高。     

妇科门诊患者HPV分型检测及结果分析

目的探讨人乳头瘤病毒（human papillomavirus,HPV）的感染在慢性宫颈炎、宫颈上皮内瘤样病变（CIN）及浸润性宫颈癌（ICC）中的表达,旨在提高宫颈上皮内瘤样病变及浸润性宫颈癌的诊断率。方法对就诊的有宫颈疾患的妇女794例,采用导流杂交HPV基因分型技术进行DNA检测。结果 HPV检测阳性113例,阳性率14.23%,其中单一型别HPV感染84例,占总数的74.33%,多型别感染的29例,占总数的25.67%,最常见的HPV基因型为52、16、58、18、53高危型感染率较低危型相比,上升趋势更为明显。结论在宫颈病变筛查中HPV检测可提高细胞学检测的有效性,是早期诊断CINⅢ及ICC的一个重要辅助方法。     

宫颈瘤变程度与其相对应的HPV基因型分布规律的研究

目的研究不同级别宫颈上皮内瘤变（cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN）与人乳头瘤病毒（Human papil-lomavirus,HPV）基因型分布之间的关系。方法收集321例经组织病理学诊断确定为CIN2及以上（CIN2＋）病人的宫颈分泌物标本,其中CIN2 67例,CIN3/ACIS 247例,浸润性宫颈癌7例。采用深圳亚能生物技术有限公司的人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）基因分型检测试剂盒对所选标本进行HPV检测及基因分型。结果在所有321例标本中,HPV阳性300例,阳性率93.5%,两型及两型以上感染138例,占比43.0%。HPV16最常见,检出率为41.1%（132/321）,其次为HPV31,33,52,18和51。HPV16和33的单型感染在CIN3＋中比CIN2更常见,具有统计学差异（P〈0.05）。在包含有HPV16或HPV33的多型感染中,含有HPV16或HPV33的多型感染在CIN3＋中比CIN2更常见,具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论 HPV16和HPV33比其他型别HPV具有更强的潜在致癌性。     

不同年龄组宫颈病变21型别人乳头状瘤病毒DNA的观察分析

目的探讨不同年龄组不同类型宫颈病变中21型别HPV DNA的检测及意义。方法应用HybriM ax基因芯片导流杂交法检测71例宫颈病变中HPV DNA,年龄自20-64岁。宫颈病变分为鳞状上皮增生空变、尖锐湿疣、低级别C IN及高级别C IN。HPV DNA 21种型别被检测,其中高危15型,低危6型。结果71例宫颈病变中50例HPV DNA阳性（69%）;按年龄分类,HPV DNA检出的频次以20-25岁（81%）最高,31-40岁最低（56%）（P=0.286）。其中高危型及高低危混合型HPV感染62%,低危型感染7%。HPV感染率在鳞状上皮增生伴空泡变性中33%,尖锐湿疣92%,低级别C IN中89%,高级别C IN中100%（χ2=26.874,P=0.001）;其中高级别C IN中均为高危型HPV基因型阳性,阳性频次基因型依次为16、33、52、18;低度C IN病变HPV基因型依次为16、31、18、52、33、6、11等。单一型别感染率65%,多重型别感染率34%。结论HPV感染可发生于各年龄组,大多数HPV感染不引起宫颈病变,可自行清除。HPV感染与病变的类型明显相关,随着病变的加重,HPV阳性率增高,高危型HPV阳性率亦随之增高。宫颈高级别C IN HPV感染型别依次为16、33、52、18等;低级别依次为16、31、18、52等。     

实时荧光定量PCR法检测人乳头状瘤病毒的实验研究

目的 通过研究病变宫颈中人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)16/18型的表达,探讨HPV16/18型病毒感染与宫颈病变发生发展之间的关系.方法 结合病理切片诊断,以免疫组化作对照.运用实时荧光定量PCR技术检测病变宫颈中HPV16/18型DNA拷贝数,以及HPV16/18型E7基因mRNA表达量.结果 慢性宫颈炎患者中HPV16/18型感染率低(7.4%).宫颈管上皮内瘤样变(CIN)组HPV16型感染率较高为69.6%,宫颈癌患者巾为72.7%.HPV16型DNA的拷贝数在宫颈上皮内瘤样变患者中与病理分级没有明显的相关性.但在宫颈癌患者中,病毒DNA的拷贝数明显升高,二者差异明显.CIN轻度(I)、中度(Ⅱ)、高度(Ⅲ)组和宫颈癌患者中,HPV16 E7基冈的表达率分别为0、37.5%、42.9%、63.6%.统计学分析表明,HPV16 E7 mRNA的拷贝数与病情呈明显的正相关性.结论 感染者中主要以HPV16型为主,HPV18型较少.宫颈癌患者中HPV16 DNA拷贝数明显高于CIN Ⅱ、Ⅲ组,HPV16型E7 mRNA在宫颈癌中表达率及表达量明显增加并与宫颈癌变呈正相关.实时荧光定量PCR适合临床宫颈病变病毒的筛查与检测.     

应用表面等离子共振生物传感器分型检测HPV及其应用评价

目的评价表面等离子共振(SPR)生物传感器分型检测女性生殖道人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的临床应用价值。方法采集女性宫颈脱落细胞504例,按病理学结果分为炎症组、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅰ组、CINⅠ-Ⅱ组、CINⅡ组、CINⅢ组、宫颈癌组。应用SPR生物传感器对各组进行检测,一次性分型检测16种HPV高危型和8种低危型,同时采用克隆测序作平行对照,结合病理诊断结果,对SPR生物传感器进行应用评价。结果SPR生物传感器和克隆测序结果的一致率为0.994,Kappa指数为0.987,(P=0.0000.05)。SPR生物传感器测得各病理组别HPV阳性率、高危型阳性率及多重感染率依次为总体(64.7%、62.1%、15.5%),炎症(41.9%、36.6%、11.8%),CINⅠ(44.6%、41.2%、13.5%),CINⅠ-Ⅱ(51.9%、48.1%、11.1%),CINⅡ(74.2%、74.2%、9.7%),CINⅢ(94.3%、93.5%、23.6%)及宫颈癌组(98.2%、98.2%、16.4%)。24种HPV基因型检出21种,阳性率依次为:16、58、33、52、66、11、18、53、6、31、45、39、81、59、70、68、51、54、56、35、40。SPR生物传感器检测HPV DNA诊断CIN III和宫颈癌的灵敏度为95.5%、特异度为52.1%、阳性预测值为52.1%、阴性预测值为95.5%。结论随宫颈病变严重程度的增高,HPV感染率和高危型感染率呈升高趋势,多重感染率无明显升高趋势;SPR生物传感器检测HPV DNA与克隆测序一致性良好,可以实现HPV分型检测,其诊断CINⅢ和宫颈癌具有较高的灵敏度和阴性预测值,在宫颈病变的临床诊断和流行病学调查中具有重要意义。     

双色荧光定量PCR快速分型、定量高危型人乳头状瘤病毒

目的针对高危型人乳头状瘤病毒（humanpapillomavims，HPV）亚型的多样性以及感染病毒载量的高低，旨在建立高危型HPV的定量与分型的快速检测方法，为HPV筛查与治疗提供依据。方法利用2种荧光染料分别标记HPV-16、HPV-33／52／58／67和HPV-18／45、HPV-31探针，同时以B球蛋白基因作为内对照，对120份疑为HPV感染的宫颈脱落细胞样本进行I{I＇V分型与定量，定量范围为5×10^1-5×10^7拷贝/ml，以HC-2杂交捕获法作为“金标准”，评价该方法的特异性与灵敏度。结果荧光定量PCR阳性检出率为52．5％（631120），其中HPV-16、HPV-18／45、HPV-31和m．V-33，52，58，67阳性率分别为36．51％（23／63）、11．11％（7／63）、12．70％（8／63）、58．73％（37／63）；HPV感染的平均病毒载量为1．08×10^7拷贝/ml。荧光定量PCR的特异性为100％，灵敏度为81．82％。结论双色荧光定量PCR能快速分型、定量高危型HPV，可用于HPV感染的筛查与宫颈病变程度预测以及疗效观察。     

人类乳头状瘤病毒分型检测在宫颈癌筛查中的临床研究

目的 探讨人类乳头状瘤病毒（human papillomavirus,HPV）基因分型检测在宫颈病变诊断中的临床应用价值.方法 选取2010年1月至2012年12月在北京大学第一医院妇产科就诊的1715例患者作为研究对象,所有患者均行宫颈脱落细胞学检查、HPV分型检测及阴道镜检查下行多点活检,并最终经组织病理学检查诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变（cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN）.分析HPV分型检查在宫颈癌筛查诊断中临床应用价值.结果 1715例CIN患者HPV检出率排名前五位的依次是HPV16、58、52、33、31;CIN2＋（包括CIN2/CIN3/原位腺癌/宫颈癌,以下简称CIN2＋）患者中前五位依次是HPVI6、58、33、52、31;其中CIN2＋中细胞学未见上皮内病变细胞和恶性细胞（negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy,NILM）患者中,Logistic回归分析结果显示HPV16、33和18型阳性致CIN2＋风险性较大,回归系数OR分别为5.031（P=0.000）、2.375 （P=0.000）和1.598（P =0.027）.宫颈脱落细胞学为非典型鳞状上皮细胞（atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance,ASCUS）,伴随HPV16、58型阳性,发生CIN2＋风险性较大,回归系数OR分别为5.139（P=0.000）和2.096（P=0.025）.宫颈脱落细胞学为低度鳞状上皮内病变（low squamous intraepithelial lesion,LSIL）,伴随HPV16、33、52型CIN2＋风险性较大,回归系数OR分别为5.774（P =0.000）、3.368（P =0.000）和1.747（P=0.034）.结论 HPV分型检测在宫颈癌筛查中具有重要作用,是指导细胞学阴性、ASCUS和LSIL患者临床处理时的重要参考指标,尤其是当HPV16型阳性时.     

人乳头瘤病毒检测在宫颈病变中的应用价值

目的了解宫颈细胞学异常患者中人乳头瘤“毒（HPV）的感染状况,评估HPV检测在宫颈病变筛查中的价值。方法随机选取宫颈薄层液基细胞学检测异常的101例患者进行了HPV检测,同时行组织病理学检查。结果（1）101例宫颈细胞学异常患者中,细胞学为ASCUS、LSIL、HSIL、鳞状细胞癌时高危型HPV阳性率分别为84．2％、88．6％、100．0％和2／2;（2）10l例细胞学异常患者中20例为CINI,81例为CINⅡ及以上级别,高危型HPV阳性率存CINI、CINⅡ及以上级别分别为60％、97．5％;（3）ASCUS组中,高危型HPV阳性患者中CINⅡ及以上病变的发生率为87．5％,HPV阴性患者中CINⅡ及以上病变的发生率为16．7％;（4）高危型HPV型别分布由高到低分别为HPVl6型39．6％（40／101）,HPV58型17．8％（18／101）,HPV52型16．8％（17／101）,HPVl8型9．9％（10／101）以及HPV33型9．9％（10／101）。结论高危型HPV感染率与宫颈病变级别呈正相关;HPV检测可作为ASCUS患者的有效分流手段。宫颈病变患者中高危型HPV感染以16、58、52、18、33型为主。     

Prevalence characteristics of single and multiple HPV infections in women with cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in Beijing,China

We assessed the prevalence characteristics of single and multiple high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections. A total of 1783 women who underwent colposcopy and cervical biopsy for abnormal ThinPrep Cytology Test and/or HR-HPV subtype genotyping results were enrolled in the study. Among the participants, 770 were diagnosed with cervicitis, 395 with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1), 542 with CIN2-3, and 76 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), with HR-HPV infection rates of 75.8%, 85.8%, 95.9%, and 88.4%, respectively. The prevalence of total and multiple HR-HPV infections exhibited a bimodal age distribution with a peak at ≤25 years, a decline with age and a second peak at ≥55 years, whereas single HR-HPV infections exhibited one peak from 35 to 44 years. The four most dominant HPV genotypes were HPV 16 (29.5%), 52 (15.0%), 58 (14.2%), and 18 (10.4%). In total, 67.0%, 70.4%, and 82.1% of patients with CIN1, CIN2-3, and SCC, respectively, had a single HR-HPV infection, which increased significantly with the aggravation of the cervical lesion grade (P = 0.045). Patients with a single HPV 16 infection had higher incidences of CIN2+ (62.2%) than those with multiple HPV 16 infections (52.4%) (P = 0.021). Patients coinfected with HPV 16 had higher CIN2+ incidence than those with single HPV 52, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 56, or 59 infections (P < 0.001). This study provided baseline data on the prevalence characteristics of single and multiple HR-HPV infections in women attending a gynecological outpatient clinic in Beijing.     

Distribution and viral load of eight oncogenic types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 integration status in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma.

Current human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing using pooled probes, although sensitive, lacks specificity in predicting the risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) progression. To evaluate selected HPV genotyping, viral load, and viral integration status as potential predictive markers for CIN progression, we performed HPV genotyping in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical tissue with cervical carcinoma (29 cases) and CINs (CIN 1, 27 cases; CIN 2, 28 cases; CIN 3, 33 cases). General HPVs were screened using consensus primers GP5+/GP6+ and PGMY09/11. HPV genotyping and viral load measurement were performed using quantitative real-time PCR for eight oncogenic HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58). HPV 16 viral integration status was evaluated by measuring HPV 16 E2/E6 ratio. We observed that HPV DNA positivity increased in parallel with the severity of CINs and carcinoma, with 59% positivity in CIN 1, 68% in CIN 2, 76% in CIN 3, and 97% in carcinoma (P trend=0.004). The eight oncogenic HPV types were significantly associated with CIN 2/3 (81%) and carcinoma (93%) (odds ratio (OR), 15.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.67-39.76; P<0.0001) compared with the unknown HPV types (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 0.89-9.22; P=0.08). HPV 16 was the predominant oncogenic HPV type in CIN 2/3 (51%) and carcinoma (71%) and integrated significantly more frequently in carcinoma than in CIN 2/3 (P=0.004). No significant differences in viral load were observed across the disease categories. Our findings suggest that selected genotyping for the eight oncogenic HPV types might be useful in separating women with a higher risk of CIN progression from those with a minimal risk. We also conclude that the HPV 16 integration status has potential to be a marker for risk assessment of CIN progression.     

Distribution of HPV infection and tumour markers in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia from cone biopsies of Mozambican women

AIMS: To evaluate human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in whole cervical cone specimens with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). In addition, to evaluate the relation between the presence of CIN lesions and HPV infection and the expression of Ki-67, p53, cytokeratins, Gp230 glycoprotein, and simple mucin-type carbohydrates. METHODS: Cervical cone specimens from five patients with CIN were studied. For each specimen, serial sections encompassing the whole cone were collected (52 samples). HPV infection and HPV types were detected by the polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay. The expression of Ki-67, p53, cytokeratins, Gp230, and simple mucin-type carbohydrates was examined immunohistochemically. RESULTS: All cases showed high risk HPV types, namely types 16, 33, 35, and 58. Four of the five patients were infected by multiple viral types. HPV-58 was always seen in CIN III, whereas HPV-35 was more frequent in CIN I. The expression of Ki-67 and p53 was higher in CIN III lesions. The expression of cytokeratins 8 and 17 showed complete or almost complete overlap with CIN III. Altered expression of Gp230, Tn, and sialyl-T was often seen in all grades of CIN. CONCLUSIONS: When whole cervical cone specimens are evaluated the rate of multiple HPV infection is very high. The expression of cytokeratins 8 and 17 is a useful marker of CIN III.     

Assessment of the effectiveness of HPV16/18 infection referred for colposcopy in cervical cancer screening in Northwest of China

To evaluate the effectiveness of Human papillomavirus16/18 infection referral to colposcopy in cervical cancer screening for women aged 25 years and older in Chinese northwest region Shaan'xi province. A total of 2224 women were diagnosed with primary high‐risk HPV infection by HPV‐DNA genotyping technology during August 2014 to August 2015. A total of 1916 cases referred for colposcopy with histological evidence were enrolled, including 1124 women with HPV16/18 genotype and 792 with other High‐risk human papillomavirus genotypes. A total of 1916 women aged 25 years and older with HR‐HPV positive were referred to colposcopy. The distribution of HPV16, HPV18, and other HR‐HPVs infection were 49.22%, 9.45%, and 41.33%, respectively. 71.56% had normal cervical histology, 7.05% had Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia1, 8.82% had CIN2, 7.25% had CIN3, and 5.32% had cervical cancer. The percentage of positivity of HPV16 and HPV18 was highly associated with the relative risk of cervical lesion. The sensitivity and specificity of HPV16/18 for detection of CIN2+ (CIN3+) was 82.68% (92.12%) and 47.87% (46.15%), respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of HPV16/18 for detection of CIN2+ (CIN3+) was 30.16% (19.75%) and 91.03% (97.60%), respectively. HPV16 and HVP18 are the most common genotypes in high grade cervical lesions in Shaan'xi province. Meanwhile, these two types play predominant roles in the progression of high grade cervical lesion. Primary HPV16/18 detection has high sensitivity and negative predictive value in cervical cancer screening and the strategy for women with HPV16 and HPV18 infection referral to colposcopy is efficient and feasible in northwestern region of China.     

Prevalence of HPV 16 and 18 DNA sequences in CIN III lesions of adults and adolescents

Adolescents may be more susceptible to cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and may have more rapid progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplastic (CIN) lesions than adults. We evaluated Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and cervical tissue specimens from a consecutive series of 25 adolescent (age 15-20 yr) and 17 adult (age 35-40 yr) patients with a histologic diagnosis of CIN III. The study patients were all Detroit residents enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO) affliated with Henry Ford Hospital. The cervical tissue specimens were evaluated for HPV 6b/11, HPV 16, and HPV 18 using agarose gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) DNA amplification. While the small sample size precluded testing for statistical significance, HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 DNA was detected in specimens from 21/25 (84%) adolescents compared to 12/17 (71%) adults (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-9.74). The relationship between adolescence and HPV infections appears to be stronger for HPV 18 and mixed HPV 16/18 infections (OR = 5.6; 95% CI = 0.7-42.4) than for HPV 16 infections (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 0.4-8.8). None of the cervical specimens contained HPV 6b/11 DNA. Oral contraceptive (OC) use was associated with HPV infection in patients with CIN III, but there was no association between cigarette smoking and HPV infection. The effect of OC use on the relationship of age and HPV could not be evaluated due to small sample size. The effects of previous sexually transmitted disease (STD) on the relationship of age and HPV were assessed. Among women with a history of STD, there was a strong association between HPV and adolescent age (OR = 18.0; 95% CI = 1.2-260.0). Our data suggest that among women with CIN III, adolescents have a higher prevalence of certain high-risk types of HPV infections than adults. The excess is due predominantly to the higher rates of HPV 18 and mixed HPV 16/18 infections in adolescents. The positive relationship between high-risk HPV infections and young age was most evident in adolescents with a history of STD. The results from this study suggest that differences in HPV type infections may be related to the more aggressive clinical course of CIN in adolescents. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

One virus, one lesion--individual components of CIN lesions contain a specific HPV type

In 20-40% of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and in 4-8% of cervical carcinoma tissue specimens, multiple HPV genotypes have been detected. Whole tissue section (WTS) PCR does not determine how the individual types relate causally to complex and multiple CIN. Our objective was to determine whether laser capture micro-dissection (LCM) with HPV PCR genotyping (LCM-PCR) could accurately recover type-specific HPV DNA from epithelial cells in individual areas of CIN and normal epithelium, and whether one or more viruses are present in one lesion. For that, histologically selected samples of CIN and normal epithelium were isolated by LCM and analysed by the SPF(10) PCR/LiPA(25) (version 1) HPV genotyping system for 25 HPV genotypes. HPV genotypes detected in 756 areas of CIN (grade 1, 2 or 3) by LCM-PCR were compared with results obtained by WTS-PCR in 60 cases (74 biopsies). We showed that when a single HPV type is detected by WTS-PCR, that type was almost always (94%; 29/31) recovered by LCM-PCR from CIN. When multiple HPV types were present by WTS-PCR, their distribution within histological sections could be mapped by LCM-PCR. Association of a single HPV type with a discrete area of CIN was found for 93% (372/399) of LCM fragments analysed by PCR. We found colliding CIN lesions associated with separate HPV types and only 62% (61/99) of HPV types detected by WTS-PCR were found in CIN by LCM-PCR. Therefore, the LCM-PCR technique was found very accurate for high-resolution HPV genotyping and for assigning an individual HPV type to an area of CIN. At LCM level, in cervical biopsy sections with multiple HPV infections, the relation between HPV types and CIN lesions is often complex. Almost every HPV type found in CIN by LCM-PCR is associated with a biological separate independent CIN lesion-one virus, one lesion.