Demonstrable parasitemia among Connecticut blood donors with antibodies to Babesia microti

BACKGROUND: Reports of transfusion-transmitted Babesia microti have risen steadily during the past several years, reflecting a concurrent increase in US cases of human babesiosis. Although several studies have measured B. microti antibodies in blood donors, little is known about associated parasitemia and the inherent risk of transmitting the parasite by transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donations from blood donors located in Babesia-endemic and nonendemic areas of Connecticut were tested for B. microti antibodies from July through September. Subsequently, an additional blood sample was collected from selected seropositive donors and tested by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. microti nucleic acids. RESULTS: A total of 3490 donations, 1745 each from endemic and nonendemic areas, were tested for B. microti antibodies; 30 (0.9%) were confirmed as positive and seroprevalence rates peaked in July. Significantly more seropositive donations were from endemic areas (24, 1.4%) than nonendemic areas (6, 0.3%). Ten (53%) of 19 seropositive donors subsequently tested by PCR were positive. CONCLUSION: B. microti seroprevalence was highest in those areas of Connecticut where the parasite is endemic. More than half of seropositive donors tested had demonstrable parasitemia, indicating that many are at risk for transmitting B. microti by blood transfusion. Three donors were identified as parasitemic in October, suggesting that donors may be at risk for transmitting the parasite outside of the peak period of community-acquired infection.     

Specificity of enzyme immunoassay for hepatitis B core antibody used in screening blood donors

Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) is currently tested by a competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassay (EIA), using recombinant DNA-produced core antigen. We have used the anti-HBc assay in routine screening of voluntary blood donors in San Francisco. The detection rate of anti-HBc was 2.08 percent. The specificity of the antibody test was established by an absorption method using purified HBc antigen (HBcAg) produced by recombinant DNA technology and covalently coupled to Sepharose 4B. Bovine serum albumin was used in the preparation of a control conjugate. The absorption test demonstrated that out of 98 anti-HBc-positive specimens, 97 could be specifically neutralized. Only one specimen was indeterminate. The absorption test was particularly useful in confirming the specificity of EIA in eight specimens inconsistently positive for anti-HBc. We conclude that the current EIA for anti-HBc is highly specific and we are of the opinion that it could be used as a rational basis for donor deferral since it gives evidence of active or previous HBV infection.     

TRANSFUSION COMPLICATIONS: Seroprevalence of Babesia microti in blood donors from Babesia‐endemic areas of the northeastern United States: 2000 through 2007

BACKGROUND: Current estimates of 70 cases of transfusion‐transmitted Babesia microti, with 12 associated deaths, suggest that Babesia is a growing blood safety concern. The extent of Babesia infections among blood donors has not been well defined. To determine how common exposure to B. microti is among blood donors, a seroprevalence study was undertaken in the American Red Cross Northeast Division. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood donations at selected blood drives in Connecticut and Massachusetts (2000 through 2007) were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies to B. microti using immunofluorescence assay. Geographic and temporal trends of B. microti seroprevalence were estimated for donor's zip code of residence. RESULTS: Overall, a 1.1% seroprevalence was identified in Connecticut, with the highest levels found in two Southeastern counties (Middlesex and New London). Observed seroprevalence for offshore islands of Massachusetts was 1.4%. Seropositive donations were identified from donors residing in all eight counties in Connecticut and three counties in Massachusetts. Although a seasonal peak was found between July and September, seropositive donations were identified in every month of the year. CONCLUSIONS: Foci of statistically higher B. microti seroprevalence among blood donors were observed; however, B. microti transfusion transmission risk exists for blood collected throughout Connecticut and portions of Massachusetts. Similarly, a seasonal peak was identified; nevertheless, seropositive donations were found year‐round. Thus, geographic and/or seasonal exclusion methods are insufficient to fully safeguard the blood supply from Babesia transmission. Steps should be taken to reduce risk of transfusion‐transmitted B. microti, perhaps through implementation of year‐round, regional testing.     

Serologic test for syphilis as a surrogate marker for human immunodeficiency virus infection among United States blood donors

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the usefulness of the serologic test for syphilis (STS) in preventing the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C viruses, and human T- lymphotropic virus via the transfusion of seronegative, infectious window-period blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Demographic and laboratory information on blood donations made between January 1992 and June 1994 in 18 American Red Cross regions was analyzed. It was assumed that the same proportion of HIV-positive and HIV-infectious window- period donations reacted on STS and were negative on other screening tests (hepatitis B and C viruses and human T-lymphotropic virus). This proportion multiplied by the estimated number of HIV-infectious window- period donations is the number of post-screening HIV-infectious donations removed by STS. RESULTS: Of 4,468,570 donations, 12,145 (0.27%) were STS positive and 377 (0.008%) were HIV positive. Among donations that were negative on other screening tests, STS-reactive donations were 12 times more likely to be HIV positive (odds ratio = 11.9; 95% CI = 5,26). However, of an estimated 13 infectious window- period donations, 0.2 would have been removed because of a reactive STS, at a cost of over $16 million. CONCLUSION: STS is a poor marker and a costly strategy for preventing post-screening HIV infections and other blood-borne diseases.     

Knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and screening in United States blood donors

BACKGROUND: Increased knowledge of HIV transmission and behavioral and test screening may encourage high-risk blood donors to self-defer. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Knowledge of HIV transmission and screening and the association with demographics, screening test reactivity, and unreported deferrable risks (UDRs) was assessed by a 1998 anonymous mail survey sent to 92,581 blood donors, of whom 57 percent responded. Groups were compared by using weighted chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Four percent of the donors thought that it was very likely or somewhat likely for a person to contract HIV from donating blood, and 20 percent perceived a similar risk from blood transfusion. Only 60 percent of the donors knew that the available screening tests may not detect a recent infection. Thirty-seven percent either did not know or felt it was acceptable to donate blood to obtain HIV testing. Those most likely to answer knowledge questions incorrectly were more likely to have a higher prevalence of test reactivity or UDRs and to be 相似文献   

Loss of volunteer blood donors because of unconfirmed enzyme immunoassay screening results. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: Blood donors who test repeatably reactive on enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and are not confirmed as positive are a continuing problem for blood banks. Units are discarded and donors are deferred, in spite of multiple studies indicating that such donors are very rarely infected with the transmissible agents. Few data are available, however, with which to evaluate whether the discarded units are more likely to come from particular demographic subgroups. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study database of over 2 million allogeneic whole-blood donations collected in the years 1991 through 1993 was utilized. The prevalence of false-positive and indeterminate test results within demographic subgroups was computed for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and human T-lymphotropic virus (anti-HIV, anti-HCV, anti-HTLV, respectively) and hepatitis B surface antigen (false-positive only) as the proportion of donations that were repeatably reactive on EIA but negative or indeterminate on the confirmatory or supplemental test. RESULTS: Several demographic groups with increased prevalence of false- positive and indeterminate anti-HIV results were the same females, younger age groups, blacks, and first-time donors. Likewise, many of the demographic subgroups with increased prevalence of false-positive and indeterminate anti-HCV results were similar: older age groups, non- whites, lower education levels, first-time donors, donors making directed donations, and donors who had received transfusions. For anti- HTLV, by contrast, the oldest group had the highest prevalence of false- positive results but the lowest prevalence of indeterminate results: blacks had the lowest prevalence of false positive results but the highest prevalence of indeterminate results. CONCLUSION: If units that test repeatably reactive on EIA but that are not confirmed as positive are almost always from individuals not infected with the virus in question, then these results indicate that there may be sex-, race-, and/or age-linked proteins cross-reacting with the test kit materials. Elucidation of these antigenic determinates and their subsequent removal should be a priority.