Effect of prior anesthetic solution on epidural morphine analgesia.

The quality and duration of analgesia and incidence of side effects following epidurally administered morphine after cesarean section are highly variable. Two suggested sources of this variability are prior use of epinephrine-containing solutions, which may enhance both analgesia and side effects of morphine, and prior use of 2-chloroprocaine, which may inhibit epidural morphine analgesia. To examine these proposed sources of this variability we performed two studies. In the first, designed to test epinephrine's effect, 30 women underwent testing for epidural catheter tip location with injection of 2-chloroprocaine, followed by either 0.5% bupivacaine alone or 0.5% bupivacaine with 5 micrograms/mL epinephrine for epidural anesthesia. Inclusion of epinephrine with bupivacaine decreased the bupivacaine dose needed to achieve a T-4 sensory block by 24% (P less than 0.05), but did not alter analgesic duration or the incidence of side effects of epidural morphine (5 mg). In the second study, designed to test the effect of 2-chloroprocaine, 30 women received 7 mL of either 2% 2-chloroprocaine or lidocaine for epidural catheter testing, followed by 0.5% bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia. Compared to lidocaine testing, 2-chloroprocaine decreased the duration of epidural morphine analgesia (median 16 h with 2-chloroprocaine vs 24 h with lidocaine; P less than 0.05) without altering the incidence of side effects. The authors conclude that addition of epinephrine to local anesthetic does not increase the incidence of side effects or the analgesic effect from epidurally administered morphine. 2-Chloroprocaine, even when administered in small doses remote to the time of morphine injection, interferes with the duration of epidural morphine analgesia.     

Does epinephrine improve the diagnostic accuracy of aspiration during labor epidural analgesia?

Aspiration reliably detects almost all IV multiorifice epidural catheters. Although a supplemental epinephrine 15-microg test dose may detect the rare IV catheter that does not yield blood on aspiration, false-positive epinephrine responses may cause some women to unnecessarily undergo repeat epidural catheter insertion. We evaluated 532 consecutive eligible patients requesting neuraxial labor analgesia. Patients were excluded if they had a contraindication to epinephrine or if they received intrathecal sufentanil/bupivacaine. Multiorifice catheters were inserted 4-6 cm into the epidural space as part of an epidural (n = 305) or combined spinal-epidural (n = 270) technique. We used aspiration, a lidocaine/epinephrine test dose, and bolus injection or infusion of dilute bupivacaine/sufentanil solutions to systematically determine IV, intrathecal, or epidural catheter location. Aspiration alone detected 47 of 48 intravascular catheters. There were 10 positive epinephrine responses: 2 were true positives, 7 were falsely positive (subsequent local anesthetic injection/infusion produced bilateral sensory change and analgesia), and 1 catheter was removed without further testing. Aspiration detected almost all intravascular catheters. Although the epinephrine test dose did detect one catheter that proved to be in a blood vessel, 87.5% of positive responses occurred in women without intravascular catheters. IMPLICATIONS: Epidural catheters may enter a blood vessel. Many clinicians use epinephrine to detect these catheters. Because aspiration alone detects almost all IV multiorifice catheters in laboring women, a subsequent epinephrine test dose may be unnecessary.     

Successful removal of a knotted fascia iliaca catheter: principles of patient positioning for peripheral nerve catheter extraction

Peripheral nerve catheters are typically advanced a substantial distance into a perineural sheath, theoretically increasing the risk of catheter knotting and kinking. In this case report, we describe successful removal of a knotted fascia iliaca catheter and discuss principles of nonsurgical catheter extraction. A 64-yr-old woman with bilateral coxarthrosis presented for total hip arthroplasty under combined general/regional anesthesia. A 20-gauge fascia iliaca catheter was inserted before surgery by using a loss-of-resistance "double pop" technique. The catheter was uneventfully advanced 10 cm past the needle tip. After injection of 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 100 microg of clonidine, general anesthesia was induced. An infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine at 20 mL/h was initiated in the recovery room for postoperative analgesia. Approximately 48 h later, resistance was encountered during catheter removal. Catheter extraction was attempted by altering patient positioning, including the supine position during which the catheter placement had occurred. Successful catheter removal was achieved by decreasing tension on the fascia lata and fascia iliaca through flexion of the hip joint and by applying firm, steady traction. The catheter was removed intact with a knot approximately 2 cm from the distal tip. We conclude that the principles for removal of entrapped peripheral catheters are not well known and may differ from those for neuraxial catheters. Patient positioning to minimize pressure and tension on the perineural soft tissues may facilitate catheter removal.     

Cathétérisme accidentel de l’espace sousdural: complication de la rachianesthésie continue et de l’anesthésie péridurale continue

Two cases of subdural catheter placement following continuous spinal and continuous epidural anaesthesia are presented. In the first, despite an easy reflux of clear cerebrospinal fluid through the catheter, the injection of 4 ml bupivacaine 0.5 per cent with epinephrine 1:200,000 followed by 3 ml tetracaine 0.5 per cent showed a failure of spinal anesthesia. In the second, the administration through the catheter of 20 ml lidocaine 2.0 per cent CO2 plus epinephrine 1:200,000 and of ten ml bupivacaine 0.5 per cent lead to an insufficient, patchy and asymmetrical analgesia. The clinical signs observed in these two cases are compared with previous publications. The importance of an x-ray contrast study to confirm the diagnosis of subdural catheter insertion is stressed.     

Analgesic effects of interpleural bupivacaine with fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain

OBJECTIVE: The analgesic effect of bupivacaine/fentanyl with epinephrine given interpleurally after thoracotomy was investigated in a randomized placebo and intravenous controlled study. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II and III patients scheduled for posterolateral thoracotomy with general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups to receive either 0.5% bupivacaine/1.5 microg/kg of fentanyl with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine (n = 15, group IPBF), 0.5 % bupivacaine with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine (n = 15, group IPB), or saline (n = 15, group IPS) in a total volume of 15 to 20 mL in 60 seconds by an interpleural catheter placed at the end of surgery by direct vision. The same volume of bupivacaine 0.25% and 1.5 microg/kg of fentanyl with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine to group IPBF, bupivacaine 0.25% with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine to group IPB or saline to group IPS was injected through the interpleural catheter every 6 hours for 48 hours postoperatively. Intravenous fentanyl (n = 15, group IVF) and interpleural saline groups received 1.5 microg/kg of fentanyl intravenously at the first complaint of pain. All patients also received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl for 48 hours postoperatively. Metamizol sodium was used as a rescue analgesic. MEASUREMENTS and MAIN RESULTS: Adequacy of pain relief was evaluated with the "Prince Henry Pain Scale" and visual analog pain scale. Fentanyl consumption via PCA and complications were evaluated for 48 hours. Visual analog scale scores were significantly higher in the interpleural saline group at 4 and 12 hours (6.6 +/- 1.2 and 5.0 +/- 2.1, respectively) postoperatively. Significantly more patients in the IPBF group had lower pain scores during coughing and deep breathing. Fentanyl consumption via PCA device was significantly higher in the intravenous fentanyl group (1,069 +/- 96.9 microg) than the interpleural groups (577.3 +/- 72.2 microg, 651.1 +/- 61.9 microg, and 601.0 +/- 22.6 microg in IPBF, IPB, and IPS groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that total fentanyl consumption via PCA decreased in all interpleural groups, but pain during coughing and deep breathing was significantly reduced in only the interpleural bupivacaine/fentanyl with epinephrine group.     

Epinephrine does not prolong the analgesia of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% or 0.2% in a femoral three-in-one block.

We tested the effect of epinephrine added to 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% and 0.2% on postoperative analgesia via a femoral catheter after total knee replacement. Forty-one patients undergoing total knee replacement under combined peripheral block/general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. After insertion of a femoral catheter, 21 patients in the Ropivacaine-Epinephrine (ROPI-EPI) group received 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1:200,000, whereas 20 patients in the Ropivacaine group (ROPI) received 20 mL plain ropivacaine 0.5%. Thereafter, a sciatic block with 30 mL bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 was performed in all patients, followed by general anesthesia. After surgery, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with ropivacaine 0.2% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 for Group ROPI-EPI and plain ropivacaine 0.2% for Group ROPI was available via the femoral catheter (200 mL ropivacaine 0.2% +/- epinephrine, bolus 20 mL, lockout 120 min). The patients were instructed to use PCA when the knee pain score was >3 cm. The interval between the initial ropivacaine injection and the first PCA injection determined the duration of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% +/- epinephrine, whereas the interval between the first and second PCA injection determined the duration of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.2% +/- epinephrine. The average duration of ropivacaine 0.5% was 657 +/- 345 min for the ROPI-EPI group and 718 +/- 423 min for the ROPI group (NS), whereas for ropivacaine 0.2%, the average duration was 409 +/- 245 min for the ROPI-EPI group and 419 +/- 339 min for the ROPI group (not significant). We conclude that epinephrine does not influence the duration of analgesia of the ropivacaine concentrations investigated. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated the effect of epinephrine on the duration of analgesia of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% or 0.2% injected in femoral three-in-one block for pain relief after total knee replacement. Our results show that epinephrine does not alter the duration of analgesia of the two solutions investigated.     

Intrathecal labor analgesia with bupivacaine and sufentanil: the effect of adding 2.25 microg epinephrine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epinephrine, 25 microg and 200 microg, has been found to prolong the duration of intrathecal labor analgesia when added to an opioid. In our hospital we use the standard epidural mixture, prepared by the pharmacist, containing epinephrine 1:800,000; i.e., 1.25 microg/mL for both spinal and epidural labor analgesia. We wanted to evaluate whether such a low dose, depending on its effect on duration or quality of analgesia, should be maintained or deleted in future mixtures. METHODS: Forty-five term parturients were randomly assigned to receive 1.8 mL intrathecally of a mixture containing bupivacaine 0.125% and sufentanil 0.75 microg/mL with or without epinephrine 1.25 microg/mL. The quality and duration of analgesia, side effects, and obstetric/neonatal outcome were compared. RESULTS: For both combinations, the onset until the first painless contraction was between 5 and 6 minutes. Most patients were pain free during the second uterine contraction. The duration of complete analgesia was 93.2 +/- 24.2 minutes in the epinephrine group and 79.3 +/- 18.1 minutes for patients not receiving epinephrine (P = .014). The quality of the block, bupivacaine consumption, side effects, and obstetric/neonatal outcome were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that epinephrine in a dose as low as 2.25 microg significantly prolonged the duration of intrathecal analgesia of bupivacaine-sufentanil by 15 minutes. No other differences were noticed. Diluting the commercially available bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000 may avoid the need of freshly prepared epinephrine solutions.     

Are combined spinal-epidural catheters reliable?

The combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique can rapidly relieve labor pain. However, the location of the epidural catheter is initially uncertain. In an emergency, this untested catheter may fail to provide adequate anesthesia. This study compared the efficacy of catheters placed as a part of an epidural or needle-though-needle CSE technique in laboring women. Patients requesting pain relief received either epidural (n=601) or CSE (n=1061) analgesia. All patients had a 20 gauge, closed tip multi-holed polyamide catheter. (B. Braun Medical, Inc.) inserted 2-8 cm into the epidural space. Catheters were tested to rule out intrathecal and intravascular location. Then, epidural patients received 10-20 ml local anesthetic +/- opioid in divided doses. CSE patients received and infusion of 0.083% bupivacaine with opioid at 10-15 ml/h. Of the 1495 catheters that were adequately tested, those inserted as part of a CSE technique were more likely to produce bilateral sensory change and adequate analgesia than were those inserted without prior spinal analgesia (98.6% vs 98.2%, P<0.02). Stand-alone epidural catheters were more likely to produce neither sensory change nor analgesia than those inserted as part of CSE technique (1.3% vs 0.2%, P<0.02). The only catheters that failed completely and were not intravascular were stand-alone epidural catheters. In this clinical setting, catheters inserted as part of a CSE technique had a high probability of being in the epidural space and functioning appropriately.     

Continuous infusion of interpleural bupivacaine maintains effective analgesia after cholecystectomy

Twenty-five patients who had undergone elective cholecystectomy were prospectively randomized to receive via an interpleural catheter either a continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine at 0.125 mL.kg-1.h-1 (n = 13) or repeated bolus injections (n = 12) of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 at 0.4 mL/kg every sixth hour. Adequacy of pain relief was measured by the amount of patient-controlled analgesia morphine required postoperatively and by patient scores on a visual analog scale obtained every sixth hour. Two venous blood samples for measurements of serum bupivacaine levels were obtained from patients in the continuous group at hours 6 and 24; four blood samples were obtained from patients in the bolus group, both immediately before and 30 min after injections at hours 6 and 24. Among the patients receiving the bolus injections, morphine was required 62 +/- 15 (SEM) times over the 24-h study period with total morphine dosage averaging 30 +/- 15 mg. Corresponding values for patients in the continuous groups were 35 +/- 10 times and 23 +/- 5 mg of morphine. The difference was not, however, statistically significant, but when activity during the 2-h time periods immediately before reinjection were examined, patients in the bolus group required and received significantly more morphine than did those in the continuous group (P less than 0.05). Patients in the continuous group had visual analog scale scores that averaged 2.9 +/- 0.6 over the 24-h study period. Patients within the bolus group had visual analog scale scores before and again 30 min after injection that averaged 5.8 +/- 0.8 and 1.8 +/- 0.5, respectively (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Perioperative interscalene block versus intra-articular injection of local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Up to 70% of patients report moderate to severe pain after shoulder surgery, which can compromise early rehabilitation and functional recuperation. Postoperative shoulder pain control is improved with both interscalene block and intra-articular local anesthetic injection. The present study hypothesized that perioperative interscalene analgesia would offer pain control superior to perioperative intra-articular local anesthetics over the first 24 hours after surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: group IS had interscalene block with catheter installation, while group IA received intra-articular local anesthetic, also with catheter installation. All patients received 3 local anesthetic injections: 0.25 mL/kg of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 2.5 microg/mL immediately before and after surgery, and 0.25 mL/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 2.5 microg/mL 1 hour after the end of surgery, after which the catheters were removed, and no further local anesthetics were administered. Postoperative pain at rest was evaluated in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), 3 hours, 6 hours and 24 hours after surgery. The area under the 24 hour pain over time curve was calculated. Hydromorphone consumption in the PACU and over 24 hours was recorded. RESULTS: Pain scores (IS: 0.4 +/- 2 vs. IA: 4 +/- 3, P < .0001) and opioid consumption (IS: 0.7 mg +/- 1.4 vs. IA: 1.5 mg +/- 1.2, P = .02) were significantly higher in the PACU for group IA. However, neither the mean pain scores over the first day after surgery (IS: 5 +/- 2 vs. IA: 5 +/- 3; P = .4) nor 24-hour opioid consumption (IS: 4.4 mg +/- 2.8 vs. IA: 4.2 mg +/- 2.6; P = .4) were significantly higher in group IA. CONCLUSIONS: PACU measurements of immediate postoperative pain and narcotic consumption favor perioperative interscalene analgesia over intra-articular analgesia. This benefit does not translate into lower overall pain for the first 24 hours after surgery.     

Comparison of 40 milliliters of 0.25% intrapleural bupivacaine with epinephrine with 20 milliliters of 0.5% intrapleural bupivacaine with epinephrine after cholecystectomy

To determine the influence of the volume of local anesthetic injected for intrapleural analgesia, 40 patients undergoing cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to two groups of 20 patients each. One group received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine injected intrapleurally postoperatively. The other group received 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine. The onset time of analgesia was nearly the same in both groups and within 25 min all patients were nearly pain free. Our data demonstrate that 100 mg of bupivacaine with epinephrine elicits effective analgesia after cholecystectomy. There are only minor differences between 20 and 40 mL with regard to pain relief. The authors conclude that the volume of local anesthetic within the range of 20-40 mL in an adult has little influence on the extent or duration of intrapleural analgesia.     

Intrapleural catheter analgesia in patients with multiple rib fractures

Patients with multiple rib fractures often suffer from severe pain that impairs their respiratory performance. The effect of interpleural administration of bupivacaine (20 ml 0.25% every 4 h) for pain management was evaluated in ten patients. The initial interpleural injection resulted in significant pain relief and improvement of arterial oxygen tension. Two patients needed additional i.v. injections of opioids (piritramide 15-22.5 mg/24 h). In one patient a small asymptomatic pneumothorax was observed following placement of the catheter, which resolved spontaneously. No other complications were reported. In an intraindividual comparison, bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine plus epinephrine 1:200,000 were compared with regard to pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, analgesic effect, side effects, and respiratory performance. The addition of epinephrine yielded only minor advantages from a pharmacokinetic point of view (median peak concentration of bupivacaine 1.8 micrograms/ml vs 2.0 micrograms/ml for bupivacaine alone). The quality and duration of analgesia and the effects on respiration were not influenced by epinephrine. The heart rate was significantly higher and the blood pressure significantly lower when epinephrine was added to the solution. Nevertheless, these differences were too small to be of clinical importance. Even though maximum total plasma concentrations of bupivacaine above 2 micrograms/ml were found in some patients, there were no signs of CNS toxicity, most probably because of the increased protein binding of bupivacaine following trauma. Accordingly, the maximum free plasma concentrations in all patients were below the threshold level of 0.24 micron/ml. We therefore conclude tht interpleural administration of bupivacaine could be a valuable means of pain relief in patients with multiple rib fractures, providing no severe pulmonary contusions or concomitant injuries are present.     

Interpleural administration of bupivacaine after cholecystectomy: a comparison with intercostal nerve block

Pethidine requirements and verbal pain scores were recorded in 36 patients after cholecystectomy via subcostal incision. All patients also received 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1/200,000. Group 1 (12 patients) received unilateral intercostal nerve blocks. Interpleural catheters were inserted through the 8th intercostal space in the remaining patients; 12 received local anaesthetic via the catheter immediately after surgery (Group 2) and 12 were given local anaesthetic at three hours (Group 3). Small asymptomatic pneumothoraces were noted on chest X-ray in six of the 24 patients with interpleural catheters. Both types of local anaesthesia produced lower pain scores than pethidine alone (P less than 0.05) with 25% of intercostal nerve blocks and 63% of interpleural catheters requiring no pethidine in the following three hours. The provision of catheter 'top-ups' between six and 18 hours after surgery also resulted in lower pain scores and a reduction in pethidine requirements (P less than 0.05).     

Effects of interpleurally administered bupivacaine 0.5% on opioid analgesic requirements and endocrine response during and after cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study

In 30 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, a randomized double-blind saline-controlled study was performed using interpleural 0.5% bupivacaine with or without epinephrine (5 micrograms.ml-1) in combination with 0.8% halothane inspired concentration in oxygen. The aim of the study was to investigate whether interpleural 0.5% bupivacaine could decrease the intraoperative opioid requirements and attenuate the metabolic endocrine response to surgical stress. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group 1: 0.5% bupivacaine; Group 2: 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine (5 micrograms.ml-1); and Group 3: saline. The interpleural catheter was inserted after induction of anesthesia in the spontaneously breathing patient. The study drug was injected 30 min prior to surgery. Peak plasma bupivacaine concentrations in the respective groups were 1.30 +/- 0.78 and 1.16 +/- 0.48 micrograms.ml-1. In all patients concentrations were below suggested convulsive level. Two patients in Group 1 and two in Group 2 required intraoperative fentanyl (0.1 mg each). In contrast, eight patients in the saline group received an average of 0.21 mg (range 0.1 +/- 0.4 mg) fentanyl (P less than 0.05). Postoperatively, a second dose of the study drug was given. Subsequently, pain was assessed using a visual analog score and a verbal rating scale. Pain scores decreased significantly 30 min after the interpleural injection in both bupivacaine groups and remained unchanged in the saline group (P less than 0.05). Pain management by means of interpleural bupivacaine was successful in 17 of the 20 patients. In the saline group seven out of ten patients needed additional analgesics (P less than 0.05). Cortisol levels increased in response to surgery in all groups: maximum levels in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were: 1.09 +/- 0.29, 1.11 +/- 0.20 and 1.19 +/- 0.16 mumol.l-1, respectively. Plasma glucose concentrations increased significantly in all groups: maximum levels in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were: 7.6 +/- 1.3, 7.3 +/- 1.7 and 8.3 +/- 1.7 mmol.l-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Periosteal infusion of bupivacaine/morphine post sternal fracture: a new analgesic technique

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sternal fracture pain is severe and is difficult to alleviate due to the forces acting on the chest wall during respiration. We describe a continuous infusion regional analgesic technique for pain due to sternal fracture. CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman presented with a spontaneous sternal fracture, precluding effective coughing. Diclofenac and increasing doses of opioids did not give adequate pain relief and led to opioid toxicity. Two brief periods of analgesia were achieved with deep subcutaneous infiltration of bupivacaine. An epidural catheter was positioned periosteally, and an infusion of bupivacaine was commenced at 5 mL/h, achieving long-lasting analgesia. The bupivacaine concentration was reduced in a stepwise fashion from 0.5% to 0.25% and was changed to levobupivacaine after 3 days. Adding morphine (5 mg/60 mL levobupivicaine) permitted a reduction in infusion rate. The catheter was removed after 14 days because a local infection developed that resolved uneventfully with antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion of local anesthetic and opioid to a sternal fracture site using a periosteally positioned catheter led to successful analgesia and hence improved respiratory function. Clinicians should consider placing a periosteal catheter when pain associated with sternal fracture cannot be adequately controlled with conventional methods.     

Comparison of three catheter sets for continuous spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) with microcatheters may be complicated because of technical problems. In elderly patients, some of the problems may be solved by using thicker catheters. A recent invention, involving a catheter-over-needle system, may prevent leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and may also improve the prediction of the intrathecal position of the catheter tip. METHODS: This study included 90 patients undergoing primary hip or knee replacement, randomly allocated into 3 groups, with 30 patients in each group: Group EC, a 24-gauge epidural catheter through a 19-gauge Tuohy needle; group MC, a 28-gauge microcatheter through a 22-gauge spinal needle; group SC, a 22-gauge spinal catheter over a 27-gauge spinal needle through an epidurally placed 18-gauge Crawford needle. All subarachnoid catheterizations were performed with the patient in the lateral position and the initial spinal block dose was 2 mL of plain 0.5% bupivacaine. Increments of 0.5 mL were administered when required. The block performance characteristics were recorded, and the level of analgesia was studied in a blinded fashion. Catheter function during the postoperative infusion was assessed. Afterwards the needles and catheters were examined by microscopy. RESULTS: The frequency of the successful catheterization was higher in the EC and MC groups (90% in each) than in the SC group (63%) (P <.05). The mean duration of the successful catheterizations, as well as the median level of analgesia, were similar in the groups. The postoperative infusion had to be stopped in 3, 1, and 1 patients in groups EC, MC, and SC, respectively, because of a technical reason. No neurologic sequelae occurred in this study. Microscopy showed 4 distorted spinal needle tips (2 each with MC and SC) and minor material damage of the SC catheters when bone had been met during block performance. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of the SC catheters was unsuccessful to a high degree, and bone contact produced distortion of the tip of some of these catheters. Otherwise, the quality associated with catheterization time, anesthetic distribution, and catheter function was similar with the 3 catheters.     

Intrapleural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain and blood levels of bupivacaine following intrapleural injection

An epidural type catheter was placed in the pleural space under direct vision before the closure of the chest in 24 patients who underwent thoracotomy for various types of lung or aortic surgery. All patients received intrapleural injections of 20 ml of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine with or without epinephrine as initial pain therapy. Patients also received subsequent doses of a similar volume of 0.375 per cent bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 up to four times a day for a maximum duration of seven days. Good pain relief was achieved in patients who underwent lateral and posterior thoracotomies. No pain relief was achieved in patients who underwent anterior thoracotomy or in patients in whom there was excessive bleeding in the pleural space. Bupivacaine blood concentrations were measured in 11 patients following the initial dose of 20 ml of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine (with epinephrine 1:200,000 in five of the 11 patients). The mean peak plasma concentration of bupivacaine when used with epinephrine was 0.32 +/- 0.02 microgram.ml-1. The mean peak plasma concentrations of bupivacaine when used without epinephrine was 1.28 +/- 0.48 microgram.ml-1. Our present data show that intrapleural analgesia is useful in the management of postoperative pain in patients who undergo thoracotomy. Our data also show that there is a significant decrease in peak plasma concentrations of bupivacaine when epinephrine is added to the solution (P less than 0.05).     

The effect of epidural test dose on motor function after a combined spinal-epidural technique for labor analgesia

Labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl, without a local anesthetic epidural test dose, provides effective analgesia and allows ambulation. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administered immediately after the initiation of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia with bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 micro g on parturients' hemodynamic stability, posterior column function, motor strength, and subjective ability to walk. Parturients (n = 153) were randomized to receive either 3 mL of epidural saline or lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000. Hemodynamic variables, proprioception, straight leg raise, and the modified Bromage score were analyzed in 110 parturients who completed the study protocol and were not different between groups. Vibratory sense, the ability to perform a partial deep knee bend and to step up on a stool, and the subjective ability to walk were impaired in a larger number of parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group at 30 min (P < 0.05). At 60 min, there were no differences between the groups except that fewer parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group could step up on a stool. The straight leg raise against resistance and the modified Bromage scale did not correlate well with other tests of motor strength (Spearman's rho, 0.273-0.405). These data suggest that the test dose should be avoided immediately after initiation of CSE analgesia when early ambulation is desired. IMPLICATIONS: A lidocaine-epinephrine epidural test dose (3 mL of lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000), injected immediately after the initiation of combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia with bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 microg, may interfere with the ability to perform simple tests of motor function and ambulation.     

A randomized, double-blind comparison of the effects of interpleural bupivacaine and saline on morphine requirements and pulmonary function after cholecystectomy

The effect of interpleural bupivacaine and saline placebo on morphine requirements and pulmonary function after cholecystectomy was investigated. Twenty-six patients were randomly assigned on postoperative day 1 to receive either 20 ml preservative-free saline (group 1) or 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine, 5 micrograms/ml (group 2) through an interpleural catheter. Adequacy of pain relief was determined by the amount of morphine used by the patient following interpleural injection. Morphine use via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system was recorded for several hours before and after interpleural injection. All patients had a forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1 measurement immediately before and 1 h after interpleural injection. Mean hourly PCA morphine use ranged from 1.6 to 2.8 mg for the 6 h prior to interpleural treatment for groups 1 and 2. There was no difference in PCA use between the groups during this time. Group 1 patients did not reduce PCA morphine use after interpleural saline. Patients in group 2, however, significantly reduced PCA morphine use after interpleural bupivacaine. Mean PCA morphine use for group 2 was 0.38 +/- 0.15 mg/h (mean +/- SE) (81% reduction vs. control) for the first 2 h after bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). Mean PCA use in group 2 was 0.52 +/- 0.2 mg/h (73% reduction vs. control) for the third hour after bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). At the fourth and fifth hours after bupivacaine injection, mean PCA morphine use was not significantly different from that in group 1. FVC and FEV1 did not improve after interpleural saline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Labor analgesia with epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl: enhancement with epinephrine and inhibition with 2-chloroprocaine

Epidural injection of drug combinations may decrease toxicity by decreasing the dose of each component, but may also result in detrimental drug interactions. In this study interactions among bupivaciane, fentanyl, epinephrine, 2-chloroprocaine, and lidocaine for epidural analgesia during labor were examined. In part 1 of the study, healthy parturients received in a random manner either 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 micrograms/ml fentanyl (n = 50), or 10 ml of this combination with 3.33 micrograms/ml freshly added epinephrine (n = 50). Epinephrine prolonged the median duration of pain relief (180 vs. 138 min, P less than 0.05) without affecting duration of first or second stages of labor, or neonatal Apgar scores. Blood pressure decreased slightly more in those receiving epinephrine, although the incidence of hypotension requiring treatment did not differ between groups. Part 2 of the study evaluated the possibility that local anesthetic used for confirming catheter tip location may interfere with the analgesic action of this bupivacaine-fentanyl-epinephrine (BFE) combination. In 50 additional parturients, a test dose of either 2-chloroprocaine (n = 25) or lidocaine (n = 25) was injected through the epidural catheter and was followed by injection of the BFE mixture. The lidocaine test dose group had a greater duration of analgesia than the 2-chloroprocaine test dose group (median duration of 164 vs. 91 min, P less than 0.05). The authors conclude that the addition of epinephrine 3.33 micrograms/ml significantly increases the duration of analgesia obtained from 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 micrograms/ml fentanyl. However, prior injection of 2-chloroprocaine, but not lidocaine, significantly decreases the duration of analgesia achieved with this BFE mixture.