The need for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a literature review

The controversy over whether or not to routinely resurface the patella during a total knee arthroplasty has persisted despite three decades of successful joint replacement procedures. Advocates for routine patellar resurfacing admit the occasional need for secondary patellar resurfacing and declare increased incidence of anterior knee pain in patients with non‐resurfaced patellae as a cause for worry. Surgeons that leave the patella unresurfaced cite avoidance of complications that include patellar fracture, avascular necrosis, patellar tendon injury and instability. This review discusses the available literature on patellar resurfacing through an evidence‐based analysis of randomized and pseudo‐randomized controlled trials and published meta‐analyses to date. The published literature seems to favour resurfacing the patellar routinely. Selective patellar resurfacing would be the ideal solution if sound pre‐operative criteria could be established. So far, a method for accurately predicting which patients can avoid patellar resurfacing has not been found. Future research looking at patellar resurfacing should concentrate on developing criteria for selecting those patients that would benefit from patellar resurfacing and those that would do as well without resurfacing, and thus, limiting potential surgical complications.     

Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Controversies existing over resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty remain in the literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomised clinical trials relevant to patellar resurfacing. The relative risk of reoperation was significantly lower for the patellar resurfacing group than for the nonresurfacing group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38–0.84, P = 0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain of the 1,421 knees included was 12.9% in the patellar resurfacing group and 24.1% in the nonresurfacing group. The existing evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing can reduce the risk of reoperation with no improvement in postoperative knee function or patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Whether it can decrease the incidence of anterior knee pain remains uncertain.     

The role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

The ideal treatment of the patella in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear. Although data exist in the literature to support either resurfacing or not resurfacing the patella, evidence continues to emerge that unresurfaced patellas deteriorate with time. Recent prospective, randomized studies also favor patellar resurfacing over retaining the native patella, reporting reoperation rates to convert unresurfaced to resurfaced patellas exceeding those for complications after patellar resurfacing. In addition, the incidence of residual patellofemoral pain after secondary resurfacing is substantially higher than when patellofemoral resurfacing is done primarily. Patient selection criteria are critical in the decision-making process. Patellofemoral complications, the greatest argument against resurfacing, have been diminished with improved surgical techniques and implant design.     

Anterior knee pain in rheumatoid patients after total knee replacement. Possible selection criteria for patellar resurfacing.

Postoperative anterior knee pain was evaluated in a consecutive series of 138 knees in 108 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by total knee replacement with Mark I Insall-Burstein prostheses. No knee had primary patellar resurfacing, and in the 119 knees followed up for a mean of 63.9 months, none had secondary resurfacing. Anterior knee pain was absent in 87 knees (73%), mild in 16 (13.5%) and moderate or severe in 16 (13.5%). The height of the patella above the prosthetic joint line was the only variable which was directly related to the incidence of anterior knee pain. The sensitivity and specificity of patellar height measurements for identifying patients with or without pain were derived. From these data, a selective policy of resurfacing the patella in those at risk was adopted. Choosing a patellar height of 15 mm or less, patellar resurfacing could be avoided in 80% of patients likely to have no pain, and the patella could be resurfaced in 65% of those likely to have anterior knee pain.     

A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty

From individual randomized studies it is unclear whether the patella should be replaced during total knee replacement. We did a meta-analysis to provide quantitative data to compare patellar resurfacing with nonresurfacing during total knee arthroplasty. Only randomized, controlled trials reported between January 1966 and August 2003 comparing patellar replacement with patella retention were included for a total of 12 studies. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data from papers. The outcomes identified were reoperations for patellar problems, anterior knee pain, knee scores, stair climbing, and patient satisfaction. The resurfaced patella performed better, and we found an increased relative risk (defined by the ratio of the risk of the event in the resurfaced group on the risk of the event in the nonresurfaced group) for reoperation, for significant anterior knee pain, and for significant pain during stair climbing when the patella was left unresurfaced. No differences were observed between the two groups for International Knee Society function score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, and for patient satisfaction. Despite these general findings, forming a definitive conclusion is difficult because many confounding factors, such as component design, surgeon experience, and technical aspects of the surgery, might influence the result in a patient.     

Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty

Out of a total of 623 patients who, over a ten-year period, underwent primary total knee replacement (TKR) without patellar resurfacing, 20 underwent secondary resurfacing for chronic anterior knee pain. They were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the clinical and radiological American Knee Society score. The mean follow-up was 36.1 months (12 to 104). The mean knee score improved from 46.7 to 62.2 points and the mean functional score from 44.7 to 52.2 points. Only 44.4% of the patients, however, reported some improvement; the remainder reported no change or deterioration. The radiographic alignment of the TKR did not influence the outcome of secondary resurfacing of the patella. Complications were noted in six of the 20 patients including fracture and instability of the patella and loss of movement. Anterior knee pain after TKR remains difficult to manage. Secondary resurfacing of the patella is not advocated in all patients since it may increase patient dissatisfaction and hasten revision.     

Patellar resurfacing reduces pain after TKA for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Influence of patellar resurfacing after knee replacement and the frequency of patella infera and its relation to the postoperative appearance of the knee pain were assessed in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Seventy-seven total knee arthroplasties using the AGC prosthesis with nonconstrained components were done on 52 patients with a mean followup of 7.3 years (range, 3-13 years). Anterior knee pain was present in 14 of 30 patients (47%) with an unreplaced patella and in two of 18 patients (11%) with patella resurfacing. The patella was replaced in 18 patients (35%) and in 23 of 77 knees (30%). Neither revision surgery of implanted patellar components nor any later resurfacing of an unreplaced patella were done during the followup. Preoperatively using the Insall-Salvati ratio, the majority of knees (54 of 77) had a low-riding patella. Patella infera occurred commonly in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. No connection between patella infera and anterior knee pain was found.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective,randomized study

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is a common complaint and typically is attributed to the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcome of resurfacing and nonresurfacing of the patella, particularly with regard to anterior knee pain, and to clarify the indications for patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized study of 514 consecutive primary press-fit condylar total knee replacements. The patients were randomized to either resurfacing or retention of the patella. They were also randomized to either a cruciate-substituting or a cruciate-retaining prosthesis as part of a separate trial. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 years (range, two to 8.5 years), and the patients were assessed with use of the Knee Society rating, a clinical anterior knee pain score, and the British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score. The assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been resurfaced. At the time of follow-up, there were 474 knees. Thirty-five patients who had a bilateral knee replacement underwent resurfacing on one side only. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was 25.1% (fifty-eight of 231 knees) in the nonresurfacing group, compared with 5.3% (thirteen of 243 knees) in the resurfacing group (p < 0.0001). There was one case of component loosening. Ten of eleven patients who underwent secondary resurfacing had complete relief of anterior knee pain. The overall postoperative knee scores were lower in the nonresurfacing group, and the difference was significant among patients with osteoarthritis (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups with regard to the postoperative function score. Patients who had a bilateral knee replacement were more likely to prefer the resurfaced side. CONCLUSIONS: As the present study showed a significantly higher rate of anterior knee pain following arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, we recommend patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee replacement when technically possible.     

Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

One hundred and eleven total knee replacements without patellar resurfacing were followed-up for a minimum of 48.8 months (range 48.8-108.2 months; average 78.2 months). Evaluation was performed using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KS-CRS). Preoperatively, the mean knee score was 34.3 points and the mean function score was 42.2 points. Postoperatively, this knee score improved to a mean of 91.1 points and the function score improved to mean of 89.6 points at the most recent follow-up. There were no significant differences among the knees with mild, moderate, or severe degenerative change to the patella with regard to the preoperative (p=0.83) and postoperative (p=0.39) knee pain score. It seems likely that the postoperative knee pain is not related to the severity of degenerative change to the patella in total knee arthroplasties performed without patellar resurfacing, and none of those patients required patellar resurfacing to achieve knee pain relief.     

Patellar clunk syndrome in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

In a series of 647 total knee arthroplasties, the patella was not resurfaced if bony geometry of the patella was good enough to maintain good congruency of the patella undersurface to the femoral component and the patella was tracking normally at the femoral component groove at the time of surgery. Three hundred seventy-two total knee arthroplasties were done with a femoral component that had the same geometry as the original total condylar prosthesis. None of these knees resulted in patellar catching, whether the patella was resurfaced or not. Two hundred seventy-five total knee arthroplasties were done with a more contemporary femoral component with wider intercondylar space and shorter posterior extension of the intercondylar notch. Eleven of these 275 knees demonstrated catching of the patella at 60° to 90° of flexion when the knee was tested from flexion to extension during the surgery. All of these 11 knees did not have patellar resurfacing during surgery at first. Of these 11 knees with patellar catching noted during surgery, at first, patellar catching was eliminated with patellar resurfacing in 4 and by shaving of the superior pole of the patella in 7. None of the knees with the patella resurfacing in this series showed patellar catching.     

Routine patellar resurfacing using an inset patellar technique

The management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty still causes controversy. Whether or not to resurface the patella in primary total knee arthroplasty remains unclear. In this study we examined 220 consecutive total knee replacements, by a single surgeon, where the patella was routinely resurfaced using the inset technique. All patellae were suitable for resurfacing. Patellar thickness was not altered in 54.5% of patellae. In 97.2% the patella was within 2 mm of the original thickness. There were no significant complications. In this study we have found that the inset technique of patella resurfacing in total knee replacement is a simple and safe resurfacing procedure.     

Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal of the available evidence

A systematic literature search for evidences comparing treatment effect and harm of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty was conducted and yielded five meta-analysis (MA), one systematic review (SR) and six randomized controlled trials not included in previous MAs/SR. The evidence suggests that patellar resurfacing would reduce the risk of anterior knee pain, as well as the risk of patella-related reoperation. Furthermore, patients not undergoing patella resurfacing would experience more knee pain during stair climbing and be less satisfied with surgery. No significant difference in range of motion can be expected with or without patellar resurfacing. Importantly, methodological limitations were observed in all retrieved studies and evidences about potential adverse events related to patellar resurfacing are presently undetermined.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty, the current state of the controversy

Summary This article reviews the current controversy of resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Up-to-date knowledge of experimental and biomechanical studies as well as the different types of implants and specifics of the patella preaparation are described in detail. The author furthermore discusses the relevant clinical studies dealing with patellar resurfacing and tries to guide the reader in evaluating the results. Finally is summarized why the indication for resurfacing the patella is so controversial and how a differentiated indication for resurfacing the patella could be specified.      

Routine Patellar Resurfacing During Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Cost-Effective in Patients Without Patellar Arthritis

BackgroundCurrently, the decision to resurface the patella is often made irrespective of the presence of patellar arthritis. The purpose of this study is to utilize the existing literature to assess cost-utility of routinely vs selectively resurfacing the patella.MethodsProspective randomized studies of patella resurfacing vs non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified through literature review. Data from these studies represented probabilities of varied outcomes following TKA dependent upon patella resurfacing. Using previously validated utility scores from the McKnee modified Health Utilities Index, endpoint utility values were provided for each potential outcome.ResultsLiterature review yielded a total of 14 studies with 3,562 patients receiving 3,823 TKAs, of which 1,873 (49.0%) patellae were resurfaced. Persistent postoperative anterior knee pain occurred in 20.9% vs 13.2% (P < .001) and patella reoperation was performed in 3.7% vs 1.6% (P < .001) of unresurfaced and resurfaced patella, respectively. In studies excluding those with arthritic patellae, the incidence of anterior knee pain was equivalent between groups and reoperation decreased to 1.2% vs 0% (P = .06). Patella resurfacing provided marginally improved quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for both selective and indiscriminate patella resurfacing. When including all studies, the incremental cost per QALY was $3,032. However, when analyzing only those studies with nonarthritic patellae, the incremental cost per QALY to resurface the patella increased to $183,584.ConclusionPatellar resurfacing remains a controversial issue in TKA. Utilizing data from new prospective randomized studies, this analysis finds that routinely resurfacing arthritis-free patellae in TKA are not cost-effective.     

The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundPatellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon’s preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced.MethodsData from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed.ResultsFor all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001).ConclusionResurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up

BACKGROUND: Whether to resurface the patella during a primary total knee arthroplasty performed for the treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis remains a controversial issue. Parameters that have been suggested as being useful in guiding this decision include patient height and weight, the presence of anterior knee pain preoperatively, and the grade of chondromalacia encountered intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these parameters were predictive of the clinical result following total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing. METHODS: Eighty-six patients (118 knees) undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. All patients received the same posterior-cruciate-sparing total knee prosthetic components. Patients were randomized to treatment with or without resurfacing of the patella. Evaluations consisted of the determination of a Knee Society clinical score, the completion of a patient satisfaction questionnaire, specific questions relating to patellofemoral symptoms, and radiographs. Sixty-seven patients (ninety-three knees) were followed for a minimum of five years (range, sixty to eighty-four months; average, 70.5 months). RESULTS: With the numbers available, there was no significant difference between the groups treated with and without resurfacing with regard to the overall Knee Society score or the pain and function subscores. Obesity, the degree of patellar chondromalacia, and the presence of preoperative anterior knee pain did not predict postoperative clinical scores or the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of anterior knee pain could not be predicted with any clinical or radiographic parameter studied. On the basis of these results, it seems likely that postoperative anterior knee pain is related either to the component design or to the details of the surgical technique, such as component rotation, rather than to whether or not the patella is resurfaced.     

Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundThe management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of patellar resurfacing in TKA.MethodsA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare outcomes between knees receiving patellar resurfacing vs those not receiving resurfacing during primary TKA. Outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Scores, reoperation rates, anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscores, and range of motion.ResultsTwenty RCTs met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences favoring the resurfaced group in the knee component and functional component of Knee Society Scores that were not clinically significant. There was an increased risk of reoperation among knees that did not receive resurfacing with number needed to treat to prevent one case of reoperation of 25 knees (for reoperation for any reason) and 33 knees (for reoperation for anterior knee pain). There were no statistically significant differences in any other outcomes.ConclusionThe only clear relationship is that knees that do not receive patellar resurfacing are more likely to receive reoperation, most often for secondary resurfacing. However, the disease burden of differing complication profiles associated with resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups remains unclear. Continuing to collect data from large, well-designed RCTs would be beneficial in guiding management of the patella during TKA.     

全膝关节置换术中髌骨面修整与髌骨置换的比较研究

目的比较全膝关节置换术髌骨面修整和髌骨置换的临床结果。方法2002年1月至12月对60例（60膝）行初次全膝关节置换术的骨性关节炎患者进行前瞻性、随机化研究。所有患者接受相同的后交叉韧带替代型全膝关节假体（PFC）,患者随机行髌骨面修整（髌骨面修整组）或髌骨置换（髌骨置换组）。58例患者平均随访54个月（40～60个月）,对其进行临床评价,包括膝关节协会评分（KSS）、膝关节活动度（ROM）、患者满意度和X线检查。结果两组患者KSS总评分（P=0．12）、KSS疼痛评分（P=0．90）、患者满意度（P=0．22）无明显差异;两组术后膝前痛的发生率均为10％亦无明显差异。两组ROM（P=0．028）和KSS功能评分（P=0．0098）差异有统计学意义。结论全膝关节置换术不论是髌骨面修整还是髌骨置换均能明显减轻疼痛和改善功能。术后膝前痛可能与假体设计和手术技术有关,并非与是否置换髌骨有关。     

Patellar resurfacing complications in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The ideal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Patellar retention is generally associated with an increased rate of anterior knee pain; however, patient satisfaction is similar in cases of replacement or retention. When the patella is replaced, potential severe complications can occur. Aim of this study was to retrospectively review results of a continuous series of patients having been treated with TKA and patella resurfacing.

Methods

The charts of 1,600 consecutive total knee prostheses were analysed to evaluate the rate of patellar resurfacing. All implants were posterior stabilized; 310 patients having received a patellar replacement were reviewed at follow-up (FU) examination. Complete physical examination as well as administration of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score was performed. X-rays analysis included weightbearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the injured knee and bilateral skyline views at 30° flexion.

Results

Two hundred and eighty patients were available for clinical and imaging investigation at an average FU of 96 (58–144) months. Mean age at the time of surgery was 70 (62–80) years. Mean HSS score was 85.9 ± 7.6. The overall rate of patellofemoral complications was 7 % (19 cases); 13 patients claimed anterior knee pain, five had symptomatic patellar maltracking and one had patellar component loosening.

Conclusion

Our data are in accordance with those available in the literature. Recent meta-analyses demonstrated lower risk of re-operation after patellar resurfacing. However, when complications of the resurfaced patella occur, they can be potentially catastrophic events.     

Patellar resurfacing for patellofemoral arthritis.

Knee pain referable to the patellofemoral articulation is common in the general population. It remains a troubling problem for the orthopedic surgeon. Frequently, initial therapy, involving activity modification, anti-inflammatory medications, and isometric quadriceps strengthening, is successful in relieving symptoms. Surgical intervention is normally reserved for those patients with pain that is resistant to these modalities. Unfortunately, none of the various surgical options has proved to be totally dependable, durable, or reproducible. The results of isolated patellar and patellofemoral resurfacing procedures have been guarded. Patellar resurfacing appears to be most beneficial in younger patients with severe anterior knee pain. These individuals should be clearly warned that there is a relatively high likelihood that they will require additional surgical treatment or patellectomy at a later date. Fortunately, patellar resurfacing does not preclude patellectomy from being easily performed. Patellofemoral resurfacing, however, involves more overall involvement of the knee joint. This makes patellectomy less likely to be a successful salvage procedure. Despite our observations that knees with primary patellofemoral arthritis do not do as well after total knee replacement as those with tibio-femoral arthritis, this procedure remains the best treatment option. The durability and predictability of total knee arthroplasty are well documented. Its results far surpass those reported for isolated resurfacing procedures. With regard to patellar resurfacing as part of total knee arthroplasty, we recommend resurfacing all patellae. The literature, although not conclusive, lends support to this practice. Avoidance of metal-backed patellar components and special attention to technical details should decrease the complications associated with patellar resurfacing in future studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)