Acute and maintenance treatment with mood stabilizers

Treatment of bipolar disorder is complicated by the multiple phases of the illness, dimensional symptomatology that varies considerably across individuals, and a limited spectrum of activity for all mood stabilizers. Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled studies provide clear guidelines to the overall efficacy of treatments for mania. However, for secondary questions, such as the treatment to employ when lithium or valproate is inadequate as monotherapy, evidence is incomplete, and usually derived from both smaller and less well-designed studies. For mania, the spectrum of efficacy of valproate is broader than for other mood stabilizers. However, many patients obtain inadequate benefit from monotherapy regimens of all mood stabilizers. Recent studies indicate that for patients who develop mania while taking a mood stabilizer, combinations of an antipsychotic and a mood stabilizer yield greater improvement than does continuation of the mood stabilizer alone. Maintenance-treatment studies support the efficacy of lithium, valproate and lamotrigine, although with a different spectrum of benefits and limitations for each. Valproate and lithium provide greater benefits for prevention of manic relapses and control of manic symptomatology than for depression. Several studies indicate actual worsening in depressive aspects of bipolar disorder with lithium treatment. Lamotrigine appears effective in delaying relapse into a new episode, with most benefits limited to delaying time to depression. Lamotrigine has not shown anti-manic activity in placebo-controlled studies. In contrast to traditional antidepressant medications, lamotrigine has not been associated with induction of mania, or of rapid-cycling illness symptomatology. Recent studies reported that carbamazepine was inferior to valproate in acute mania, and inferior to lithium in maintenance treatment. Other putative mood stabilizers have to date yielded negative or inconclusive results in studies in mania. Systematic studies are needed to clarify treatment guidelines for youth with bipolar disorder, and for other special populations, e.g. pregnant women and the elderly.     

Polytherapy in bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a life-long condition that is associated with frequent recurrence/relapse of symptoms. Although putative mood stabilisers, such as lithium, are considered to improve the natural course of bipolar disorder, complete long-term remission is rarely achieved. In order to effectively control mood symptoms and to reduce relapse, clinicians often use polypharmacy to treat patients with bipolar disorder. In this article, we examine the recent literature on treatment strategies in bipolar disorder to determine if combination treatments provide additional benefit over monotherapy for the management of various phases of bipolar disorder. The evidence suggests that for acute mania a combination of lithium or valproate and an atypical antipsychotic is the most effective approach, with approximately 20% more patients responding to the combination than to monotherapy with any antimanic agent. Few studies have examined the use of combination therapy in comparison to monotherapy for bipolar depression. The limited evidence suggests that lithium plus an antidepressant appears to be more effective than lithium alone in those with lower serum lithium concentrations. Similarly, the combination of olanzapine plus fluoxetine is more effective than olanzapine alone. There is consensus that antidepressant monotherapy is not appropriate because of concerns of a manic switch, but monotherapy with lithium or lamotrigine may be adequate for mild to moderate bipolar depression. For maintenance treatment, commonly used agents, such as lithium, valproate or olanzapine appear to be most effective in preventing manic relapses, whereas lamotrigine is more effective in preventing depressive relapses. As a result of these findings, it makes intuitive sense to combine lamotrigine with lithium, valproate or an atypical antipsychotic to achieve better mood stability. However, the efficacy and safety of such combinations have not been systematically compared with monotherapy. Preliminary studies suggest that lithium plus valproate may be more effective than lithium alone in preventing affective relapses. Similarly, the combination of lithium or valproate plus olanzapine seems to be more effective than monotherapy with a mood stabiliser in preventing manic episodes.     

Polarity index of pharmacological agents used for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder

Over one half of bipolar patients have been reported to be more prone to either depressive or manic relapses. This study aimed to define profiles of drugs used for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) by the means of Polarity Index. Polarity Index is a new metric indicating the relative antimanic versus antidepressive preventive efficacy of drugs. Polarity Index was retrieved by calculating Number Needed to Treat (NNT) for prevention of depression and NNT for prevention of mania ratio, as emerging from the results of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Included trials were randomized and double blind, with a minimal duration of 24 weeks, assessing effectiveness of a mood stabilizer or antipsychotic drug alone or in combination with a mood stabilizing agent versus a placebo comparator in BD maintenance treatment. Polarity Index value above 1.0 indicates a relative greater antimanic prophylactic efficacy, number below 1.0 a relative greater antidepressive efficacy. The polarity index for the drugs used in maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder was 12.09 for risperidone, 4.38 for aripiprazole, 3.91 for ziprasidone, 2.98 for olanzapine, 1.39 for lithium, 1.14 for quetiapine, and 0.40 for lamotrigine. Polarity index of valproate and oxcarbazepine may not be reliable due to the failure of their maintenance trials. The polarity index provides a measure of how much antidepressant versus antimanic a drug is in bipolar disorder prophylaxis, and may guide the choice of maintenance therapy in bipolar patients.     

Bipolar depression: management options

Bipolar depression is the predominant abnormal mood state in bipolar disorder. However, despite the key pertinence of this phase of the condition, the focus of research and indeed of clinical interest in the management of bipolar disorder has been mainly on mania. Bipolar depression has been largely neglected, and early studies often failed to distinguish depression due to major unipolar depression from that due to bipolar disorder. Consequently, many treatments used in the management of major depression have been adopted for use in bipolar depression without any robust evidence of efficacy. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), bupropion, tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors are all effective antidepressants in the management of bipolar depression. They are all associated with a small risk of antidepressant-induced mood instability. The mood stabilisers lithium, carbamazepine and valproate semisodium (divalproex sodium) all appear to have modest acute antidepressant properties. Among these, lithium is supported by the strongest data, but the use of lithium in the treatment of bipolar depression as a monotherapeutic agent is limited by its slow onset of action. Recently, there has been a growing body of evidence suggesting that lamotrigine may have particular effectiveness in both the acute and prophylactic management of bipolar depression. Clinical management of bipolar depression involves various combinations of antidepressants and mood stabilisers and is partly determined by the context in which the depressive episode occurs. In general, 'de novo' and 'breakthrough' (where the patient is already receiving medication) bipolar depression may be successfully managed by initiating mood stabiliser monotherapy, to which an antidepressant or second mood stabiliser may be added at a later date, if necessary. Breakthrough episodes of bipolar depression occurring in patients receiving combination therapy (two mood stabilisers or a mood stabiliser plus an antidepressant) require either switching of ongoing medications or further augmentation. If this fails, then novel strategies or ECT should be considered. Bipolar depression is a disabling illness and the predominant mood state for the vast majority of those with bipolar disorder. It therefore warrants prompt management once suitably diagnosed, especially as it is associated with a considerable risk of suicide and in the majority of instances is eminently treatable.     

The armamentarium of treatments for bipolar disorder: a review of the literature

To assess current pharmacotherapeutic options for bipolar disorder, with particular emphasis on the use of antipsychotic agents, Medline and EMBASE were searched between January 1980 and December 2005 using the keywords "schizoaffective disorder" and "bipolar disorder", combined with various antidepressants, antipsychotics, lithium or other mood stabilizers. English-language articles, review articles and original research articles were reviewed. Most data are available for the "mood stabilizers" lithium and valproate. However, these agents have important limitations regarding their tolerability and efficacy in certain groups. Newer anticonvulsants, especially lamotrigine, have demonstrated efficacy across mood-symptom domains. Antidepressants are not generally favoured as monotherapy in patients with bipolar depression or schizoaffective disorder, due to their potential to induce switching to manic states. However, data are emerging for the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for bipolar depression in combination with atypical antipsychotics. Atypical antipsychotics may also be used as monotherapy or in conjunction with mood stabilizers for the treatment of acute mania and for continuing maintenance therapy. The choice of antipsychotic may be influenced by the therapeutic situation; formulations that facilitate administration in the acute scenario can provide rapid tranquillization, whereas those that enhance compliance may have a place in maintenance therapy. Our results suggest a growing role for atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar disorder and further data are anticipated.     

Anticonvulsants in the treatment of mood disorders: assessing current and future roles

Anticonvulsants are frequently used in the treatment of affective illnesses, especially for patients refractory to or intolerant of other treatments. The differential therapeutic roles of anticonvulsants, however, remain largely undetermined. The author reviews the available efficacy data for carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Valproate is efficacious in the monotherapy of acute manic presentations but confirmatory evidence of the efficacy of valproate in long-term maintenance has been elusive. Valproate and possibly carbamazepine, may provide a therapeutic advantage over lithium in non-classic bipolar conditions such as mixed mood states and rapid cycling conditions. Lamotrigine is unique among the anticonvulsants in its monotherapy efficacy for bipolar I depression. Emerging data also suggest a role for lamotrigine in the adjunctive treatment of depressive mixed states and rapid cycling conditions in the absence of prominent manic symptoms. Controlled trials have found gabapentin ineffective for acute mania and refractory bipolar conditions. The role of gabapentin in the treatment of other aspects of affective illness remains uncertain. Definitive statements regarding the differential psychotropic use of topiramate and oxcarbazepine are not possible, though active investigation is underway to better characterise the utility of topiramate. The author suggests that current diagnostic models utilised in controlled trials may limit identification of differential therapeutic benefits. Caution is advised in generalising from the ability or inability of an agent to demonstrate antimanic activity. Future studies of newer anticonvulsants should include dimensional perspectives and soft bipolar presentations, as the greatest contribution of the newer anticonvulsants may be in treatment of mood conditions other than acute mania.     

Anticonvulsants in the treatment of mood disorders: assessing current and future roles

Anticonvulsants are frequently used in the treatment of affective illnesses, especially for patients refractory to or intolerant of other treatments. The differential therapeutic roles of anticonvulsants, however, remain largely undetermined. The author reviews the available efficacy data for carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Valproate is efficacious in the monotherapy of acute manic presentations but confirmatory evidence of the efficacy of valproate in long-term maintenance has been elusive. Valproate and possibly carbamazepine, may provide a therapeutic advantage over lithium in non-classic bipolar conditions such as mixed mood states and rapid cycling conditions. Lamotrigine is unique among the anticonvulsants in its monotherapy efficacy for bipolar I depression. Emerging data also suggest a role for lamotrigine in the adjunctive treatment of depressive mixed states and rapid cycling conditions in the absence of prominent manic symptoms. Controlled trials have found gabapentin ineffective for acute mania and refractory bipolar conditions. The role of gabapentin in the treatment of other aspects of affective illness remains uncertain. Definitive statements regarding the differential psychotropic use of topiramate and oxcarbazepine are not possible, though active investigation is underway to better characterise the utility of topiramate. The author suggests that current diagnostic models utilised in controlled trials may limit identification of differential therapeutic benefits. Caution is advised in generalising from the ability or inability of an agent to demonstrate antimanic activity. Future studies of newer anticonvulsants should include dimensional perspectives and soft bipolar presentations, as the greatest contribution of the newer anticonvulsants may be in treatment of mood conditions other than acute mania.     

The place of anticonvulsant therapy in bipolar illness

 With the increasing recognition of lithium’s inadequacy as an acute and prophylactic treatment for many patients and subtypes of bipolar illness, the search for alternative agents has centered around the mood stabilizing anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate. In many instances, these drugs are effective alone or in combination with lithium in those patients less responsive to lithium monotherapy, including those with greater numbers of prior episodes, rapid-cycling, dysphoric mania, co-morbid substance abuse or other associated medical problems, and patients without a family history of bipolar illness in first-degree relatives. Nineteen double-blind studies utilizing a variety of designs suggest that carbamazepine, or its keto-congener oxcarbazepine, is effective in acute mania; six controlled studies report evidence of the efficacy of valproate in the treatment of acute mania as well. Fourteen controlled or partially controlled studies of prophylaxis suggest carbamazepine is also effective in preventing both manic and depressive episodes. Valproate prophylaxis data, although based entirely on uncontrolled studies, appear equally promising. Thus, both drugs are widely used and are now recognized as major therapeutic tools for lithium-nonresponsive bipolar illness. The high-potency anticonvulsant benzodiazepines, clonazepam and lorazepam, are used adjunctively with lithium or the anticonvulsant mood stabilizers as substitutes or alternatives for neuroleptics in the treatment of manic breakthroughs. Preliminary controlled clinical trials suggest that the calcium channel blockers may have antimanic or mood-stabilizing effects in a subgroup of patients. A new series of anticonvulsants has just been FDA-approved and warrant clinical trials to determine their efficacy in acute and long-term treatment of mania and depression. Systematic exploration of the optimal use of lithium and the mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants alone and in combination, as well as with adjunctive antidepressants, is now required so that more definitive treatment recommendations for different types and stages of bipolar illness can be more strongly evidence based. Received: 20 May 1996 / Final version: 19 July 1996     

The anticonvulsants lamotrigine, riluzole, and valproate differentially regulate AMPA receptor membrane localization: relationship to clinical effects in mood disorders.

A growing body of data suggests that the glutamatergic system may be involved in the pathophysiology and treatment of severe mood disorders. Chronic treatment with the antimanic agents, lithium and valproate, resulted in reduced synaptic expression of the AMPA(-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid) receptor subunit GluR1 in the hippocampus, while treatment with an antidepressant (imipramine) enhanced the synaptic expression of GluR1. The anticonvulsants, lamotrigine (6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,4-triazine-3,5-diamine) and riluzole (2-amino-6-trifluoromethoxybenzothiazole), have been demonstrated to have efficacy in the depressive phase of bipolar disorder. We therefore sought to determine the role of these anticonvulsants, compared to that of the predominantly antimanic anticonvulsant valproate, on AMPA receptor localization. We found that the agents with a predominantly antidepressant profile, namely lamotrigine and riluzole, significantly enhanced the surface expression of GluR1 and GluR2 in a time- and dose-dependent manner in cultured hippocampal neurons. By contrast, the predominantly antimanic agent, valproate, significantly reduced surface expression of GluR1 and GluR2. Concomitant with the GluR1 and GluR2 changes, the peak value of depolarized membrane potential evoked by AMPA was significantly higher in lamotrigine- and riluzole-treated neurons, supporting the surface receptor changes. Phosphorylation of GluR1 at the PKA (cAMP-dependent protein kinase) site (S845) was enhanced in both lamotrigine- and riluzole-treated hippocampal neurons, but reduced in valproate-treated neurons. In addition, lamotrigine and riluzole, as well as the traditional antidepressant imipramine, also increased GluR1 phosphorylation at GluR1 (S845) in the hippocampus after chronic in vivo treatment. Our findings suggest that regulation of GluR1/2 surface levels and function may be responsible for the different clinical profile of anticonvulsants (antimanic or antidepressant), and may suggest avenues for the development of novel therapeutics for these illnesses.     

Newer antiepileptic drugs in bipolar disorder: rationale for use and role in therapy

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDS) are used regularly in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorders. Carbamazepine and valproic acid (sodium valproate) are effective as antimanic treatments, and the success of these medications has prompted investigation of other AEDs as possible treatments in patients with mood disorders. Lamotrigine appears to be the most promising of the newer AEDs with respect to effects in mood disorders. Current evidence suggests efficacy of this drug both as monotherapy and as an adjunctive agent in bipolar depression, and studies are underway to clarify its efficacy in mood stabilisation and rapid cycling, as currently available data are equivocal. Use of gabapentin is not as well supported in the literature, although data from open trials using it as an adjunctive agent suggest that it may be helpful in patients with bipolar depression. There have been some open trials and case reports supporting the use of topiramate as an adjunctive agent for the treatment of mania; however, data from controlled trials are not yet available. Further controlled trials of lamotrigine, gabapentin or topiramate as monotherapy and adjunctive treatment are needed to clarify their potential roles in the treatment of patients with mood disorders.     

Quetiapine prevents anhedonia induced by acute or chronic stress.

The role of atypical antipsychotics as add-on treatments and as primary mood stabilizers in different phases of bipolar disorder is an important current research area. Although in bipolar patients the main therapeutic indication of quetiapine (QTP) is the management of acute mania, several observations suggest that this agent may exert antidepressant as well as antimanic effects. However, in our knowledge, there are no preclinical studies supporting this hypothesis. Thus, the main goal of the present work was to evaluate the putative antidepressant effect of QTP (0.4, 2.0, or 10 mg/kg/day), in comparison to amitriptyline (AMI) (2 or 5 mg/kg/day), in rats exposed to acute or chronic stress. The administration of QTP, 2 mg/kg/day, prevents the onset of anhedonia in rats exposed to a 6-week chronic mild stress (CMS) protocol. The effect of QTP has a slow onset, beginning at week 5, and causes a complete recovery from anhedonia. In this respect, the effect of QTP is similar to that obtained after chronic administration of AMI 2 or 5 mg/kg/day. Our findings also indicate that a 6-week administration of QTP, 2 or 10 mg/kg/day, has protective effects against the onset of anhedonia caused by the exposure to an acute subthreshold stressful event in rats that have previously experienced the CMS procedure. The results suggest that QTP is able to prevent both the transient mood depression caused by acute stress and the long-lasting anhedonic state induced by exposure, over a period of weeks, to a variety of unpredictable mild stressors.     

Mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics: bimodal treatments for bipolar disorder

Treatment options for bipolar disorder have rapidly expanded over the last decade, but providing optimal management remains an elusive goal. The authors reviewed the literature on the efficacy of agents with the best clinical evidence supporting their use in bipolar disorder, including the mood stabilizers lithium, valproate, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine, as well as the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. Most medications appear to be more effective for symptoms of mood elevation than for symptoms of depression. The efficacy, tolerability, and safety profiles of agents must be considered when making clinical decisions. Several agents, including lithium, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, can cause problematic weight gain. In addition, the use of atypical antipsychotics has been associated with an increased risk of metabolic abnormalities such as dyslipidemia, hypergylycemia, and diabetes mellitus. In most patients, monotherapy offers inadequate efficacy. Further investigation of combinations of agents such as mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics may yield valuable insights into the potential of combination therapies to enhance clinical outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder.     

Lamotrigine: a review of its use in bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine (Lamictal), a phenyltriazine derivative, is a well established anticonvulsant agent that has shown efficacy in the prevention of mood episodes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder. The mechanism of action of the drug in patients with bipolar disorder may be related to the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels in presynaptic neurons and subsequent stabilisation of the neuronal membrane. Lamotrigine monotherapy significantly delayed time to intervention with additional pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for any new mood episode (mania, hypomania, depression and mixed episodes), compared with placebo, in two large, randomised, double-blind trials of 18 months' duration. Additionally, lamotrigine was significantly superior to placebo at prolonging time to intervention for depression. These effects of lamotrigine were demonstrated in both recently manic/hypomanic and recently depressed patients. Lamotrigine showed efficacy in delaying manic/hypomanic episodes in pooled data only, although lithium was superior to lamotrigine on this measure. Two of four double-blind, short-term studies have shown lamotrigine to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder or those with bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania.Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated in maintenance studies with the most common adverse events being headache, nausea, infection and insomnia. Incidences of diarrhoea and tremor were significantly lower in lamotrigine- than in lithium-treated patients. The incidence of serious rash with lamotrigine treatment was 0.1% in all studies of bipolar disorder and included one case of mild Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Lamotrigine did not appear to cause bodyweight gain. The dosage of lamotrigine is titrated over a 6-week period to 200 mg/day to minimise the incidence of serious rash. Adjustments to the initial and target dosages are required if coadministered with valproate semisodium or carbamazepine. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder, significantly delaying time to intervention for any mood episode. Additionally, lamotrigine significantly delayed time to intervention for a depressive episode and showed limited efficacy in delaying time to intervention for a manic/hypomanic episode, compared with placebo. Although not approved for the short-term treatment of mood episodes, lamotrigine has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar depression but has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine is generally well tolerated, does not appear to cause bodyweight gain and, unlike lithium, generally does not require monitoring of serum levels.     

Mood stabilization and the role of antipsychotics

The pharmacological management of bipolar disorder is complex as a result of the cyclic nature of the condition. Long-term treatment is, however, essential to control the symptoms of depression and mania and to stabilize the cyclical mood changes. In particular the use of mood stabilizers in all phases of treatment has been acknowledged. The atypical antipsychotics are being increasingly used to control acute manic episodes, and data are emerging to support their mood-stabilizing and antidepressant properties. This article will review the results from open and double-blind studies with quetiapine, ziprasidone, risperidone and olanzapine in the management of bipolar disorder.     

Spotlight on lamotrigine in bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine (Lamictal), a phenyltriazine derivative, is a well established anticonvulsant agent that has shown efficacy in the prevention of mood episodes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder. The mechanism of action of the drug in patients with bipolar disorder may be related to the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels in presynaptic neurons and subsequent stabilisation of the neuronal membrane. Lamotrigine monotherapy significantly delayed time to intervention with additional pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for any new mood episode (mania, hypomania, depression and mixed episodes), compared with placebo, in two large, randomised, double-blind trials of 18 months' duration. Additionally, lamotrigine was significantly superior to placebo at prolonging time to intervention for depression. These effects of lamotrigine were demonstrated in both recently manic/hypomanic and recently depressed patients. Lamotrigine showed efficacy in delaying manic/hypomanic episodes in pooled data only, although lithium was superior to lamotrigine on this measure. Two of four double-blind, short-term studies have shown lamotrigine to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder or those with bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated in maintenance studies with the most common adverse events being headache, nausea, infection and insomnia. Incidences of diarrhoea and tremor were significantly lower in lamotrigine- than in lithium-treated patients. The incidence of serious rash with lamotrigine treatment was 0.1% in all studies of bipolar disorder and included one case of mild Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Lamotrigine did not appear to cause bodyweight gain. The dosage of lamotrigine is titrated over a 6-week period to 200 mg/day to minimise the incidence of serious rash. Adjustments to the initial and target dosages are required if coadministered with valproate semisodium or carbamazepine. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder, significantly delaying time to intervention for any mood episode. Additionally, lamotrigine significantly delayed time to intervention for a depressive episode and showed limited efficacy in delaying time to intervention for a manic/hypomanic episode, compared with placebo. Although not approved for the short-term treatment of mood episodes, lamotrigine has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar depression but has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine is generally well tolerated, does not appear to cause bodyweight gain and, unlike lithium, generally does not require monitoring of serum levels.     

Current aspects of valproate in bipolar disorder

For more than 30 years, lithium has been the drug of choice for the treatment of bipolar disorder. However, it has numerous adverse effects, a relatively slow onset of action, many common drug-drug interactions, and a narrow therapeutic index. Because of these problems, researchers looked for alternative and/or adjunctive treatments in bipolar disorder, focusing on the anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate. The existing data of valproate are reviewed pointing out its promises and limitations in psychiatric diseases. Growing data indicate that valproate is a well tolerated and effective agent in bipolar disorder. Controlled studies prove its use in acute mania, often with a rapid onset of action. Open studies suggest that the drug also reduces the frequency and intensity of recurrent manic and depressive episodes over extended periods. Its acute and prophylactic antidepressant effects are probably minor to its antimanic efficacy. Recent data support the specific therapeutic efficacy of valproate in certain subtypes of bipolar illness: rapid cycling variant, mixed mania, bipolar disorder associated with panic attacks, comorbid alcohol or substance abuse, with neurological features or secondary to organic illnesses. These features make valproate interesting as an alternative treatment for patients who generally respond less well to lithium or as a useful adjunct in the treatment of complicated patients who do not respond to single agents. However, further controlled studies are warranted to provide clear guidelines for the treatment with valproate.     

心境稳定剂在治疗儿童精神障碍中的应用

心境稳定剂在儿童和青少年心理和行为障碍治疗中的应用广泛,适用于治疗双相情感障碍、破坏性行为障碍和注意力缺陷-多动障碍等行为障碍患者出现的冲动和攻击行为以及情绪不稳定和易激惹等表现,同时对发育迟缓儿童如精神发育迟滞和孤独症等患者出现的伤害他人或自伤行为治疗也有效果。在经典的心境稳定剂中,锂盐是唯一获准可一线用于儿童和青少年双相情感障碍患者躁狂发作和维持治疗的药物,而丙戊酸盐、卡马西平、奥卡西平和拉莫三嗪在治疗儿童攻击性或破坏性行为中也有一定的临床应用。选用心境稳定剂治疗儿童精神障碍时应考虑药物的疗效证据、安全性和不良反应以及患者的靶症状、疾病史、用药史和家族史等,以确保儿童用药安全、有效。     

Concomitant use of lamotrigine and aripiprazole increases risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome?

Stevens-Johnson syndrome is a severe and potentially life-threatening cutaneous reaction associated with lamotrigine. The incidence of developing Stevens-Johnson syndrome during lamotrigine therapy is low. On the basis of the glutamate and dopamine neuron dysregulation hypothesis in schizophrenia, we propose new strategies for the treatment of schizophrenic patients using a glutamate system stabilizer lamotrigine as an adjunctive treatment for the poor responders of a dopamine system stabilizer, aripiprazole. The finding of Stevens-Johnson syndrome in two cases out of three treated with lamotrigine plus aripiprazole, however, has a much higher index of suspicion and it is correct to warn of its possible raised risk. As lamotrigine is currently licensed for the prophylactic treatment of bipolar depression, many of these patients have psychotic features where it would be considered reasonable to add an antimanic atypical antipsychotic such as aripriprazole. The two case reports raised the question about the possible increased risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome with the combination therapy.     

Lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine has undergone a remarkable series of systematic studies since 1994 that now establish it as an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment in bipolar disorder. Its efficacy principally addresses both acute and maintenance phase benefits on depressive symptomatology. These benefits have been demonstrated in placebo-controlled studies, rapid cycling patients, bipolar I and II patients and monotherapy as well as in combination therapy, although this has been less well studied. The drug is exceptionally well-tolerated in long-term treatment, although initial dosing requires gradual dosage escalation to avoid the risk of inducing serious rashes with features within the spectrum of Stevens–Johnson syndrome. Administration with valproate requires a slower dosage titration, whereas, as with many drugs, administration with carbamazepine requires a more rapid dosage increase. In contrast to marketed antidepressants, lamotrigine appears not to induce manic or hypo-manic episodes, nor to increase cycling frequency. This combination of properties makes it a first-choice treatment for acute bipolar depression and continuation treatment, especially, but not limited to, prophylaxis against recurrent depression and depressive symptoms. Lamotrigine appears not to have acute antimanic properties. A small number of studies suggest a broader spectrum of efficacy, including in some axis I disorders that are comorbidly associated with bipolar disorder.     

Lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine has undergone a remarkable series of systematic studies since 1994 that now establish it as an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment in bipolar disorder. Its efficacy principally addresses both acute and maintenance phase benefits on depressive symptomatology. These benefits have been demonstrated in placebo-controlled studies, rapid cycling patients, bipolar I and II patients and monotherapy as well as in combination therapy, although this has been less well studied. The drug is exceptionally well-tolerated in long-term treatment, although initial dosing requires gradual dosage escalation to avoid the risk of inducing serious rashes with features within the spectrum of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Administration with valproate requires a slower dosage titration, whereas, as with many drugs, administration with carbamazepine requires a more rapid dosage increase. In contrast to marketed antidepressants, lamotrigine appears not to induce manic or hypo-manic episodes, nor to increase cycling frequency. This combination of properties makes it a first-choice treatment for acute bipolar depression and continuation treatment, especially, but not limited to, prophylaxis against recurrent depression and depressive symptoms. Lamotrigine appears not to have acute antimanic properties. A small number of studies suggest a broader spectrum of efficacy, including in some axis I disorders that are comorbidly associated with bipolar disorder.