A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction--internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients

We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates in elderly patients with displaced intra-articular, distal humeral fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or primary semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Forty-two patients were randomized by sealed envelope. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 65 years; displaced, comminuted, intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 13C); and closed or Gustilo grade I open fractures treated within 12 hours of injury. Both ORIF and TEA were performed following a standardized protocol. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were determined at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years. Complication type, duration, management, and treatment requiring reoperation were recorded. An intention-to-treat analysis and an on-treatment analysis were conducted to address patients randomized to ORIF but converted to TEA intraoperatively. Twenty-one patients were randomized to each treatment group. Two died before follow-up and were excluded from the study. Five patients randomized to ORIF were converted to TEA intraoperatively because of extensive comminution and inability to obtain fixation stable enough to allow early range of motion. This resulted in 15 patients (3 men and 12 women) with a mean age of 77 years in the ORIF group and 25 patients (2 men and 23 women) with a mean age of 78 years in the TEA group. Baseline demographics for mechanism, classification, comorbidities, fracture type, activity level, and ipsilateral injuries were similar between the 2 groups. Operative time averaged 32 minutes less in the TEA group (P = .001). Patients who underwent TEA had significantly better MEPSs at 3 months (83 vs 65, P = .01), 6 months (86 vs 68, P = .003), 12 months (88 vs 72, P = .007), and 2 years (86 vs 73, P = .015) compared with the ORIF group. Patients who underwent TEA had significantly better DASH scores at 6 weeks (43 vs 77, P = .02) and 6 months (31 vs 50, P = .01) but not at 12 months (32 vs 47, P = .1) or 2 years (34 vs 38, P = .6). The mean flexion-extension arc was 107 degrees (range, 42 degrees -145 degrees) in the TEA group and 95 degrees (range, 30 degrees -140 degrees) in the ORIF group (P = .19). Reoperation rates for TEA (3/25 [12%]) and ORIF (4/15 [27%]) were not statistically different (P = .2). TEA for the treatment of comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures resulted in more predictable and improved 2-year functional outcomes compared with ORIF, based on the MEPS. DASH scores were better in the TEA group in the short term but were not statistically different at 2 years' follow-up. TEA may result in decreased reoperation rates, considering that 25% of fractures randomized to ORIF were not amenable to internal fixation. TEA is a preferred alternative for ORIF in elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures that are not amenable to stable fixation. Elderly patients have an increased baseline DASH score and appear to accommodate to objective limitations in function with time.     

A comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intraarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65

OBJECTIVE: To compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) for intraarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than 65 years of age. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Information was obtained from a Level 1 trauma center with fellowship-trained traumatologists and a tertiary care center with fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons. PATIENTS: Patients were 24 women older than age 65 who sustained distal humerus fractures that required surgical treatment with clinical follow-up at a minimum of 2 years. All fractures were OTA classification 13.C2 or 13.C3. No patients were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTION: ORIF or TEA was the treatment method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The Mayo Elbow Performance score and the need for revision surgery were established as the means of patient evaluation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Using the Mayo Elbow Performance score, the outcomes of the 12 patients treated with ORIF were as follows: 4 excellent, 4 good, 1 fair, and 3 poor (cases that required conversion to TEA). Outcomes of the 12 patients treated with TEA were as follows: 11 excellent and 1 good. There were no fair or poor outcomes in the TEA group. No patients treated with TEA required revision surgery. We believe TEA to be a viable treatment option for distal intraarticular humerus fractures in women older than age 65. This is particularly true for women with associated comorbidities, such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, and conditions requiring the use of systemic steroids.     

双钢板内固定与入工全肘关节置换术治疗老年肱骨髁间C型骨折的早期疗效比较

目的 比较老年肱骨髁间C型骨折应用双钢板内固定与人工全肘关节置换术的疗效.方法 2003年4月至2009年9月,采用双钢板内固定或人工全肘关节置换术治疗新鲜老年肱骨髁间骨折42例,骨折分型均为AO分型C型.对其中随访资料较完整的22例进行回顾性分析.双钢板内固定10例,男5例,女5例;年龄60～70岁,平均63.2岁;1例Gustilo Ⅰ型开放骨折,余9例均为闭合性骨折.人工全肘关节置换术12例,均为女性;年龄60～74岁,平均65.2岁;均为闭合性骨折.术后1、2、3、6个月、1年进行复查,之后每年复查1次.采用Mayo肘关节功能评分(Mayo elbow performance score,MEPS)进行评估,观察术后肘关节屈伸活动度、功能评分、优良率及并发症.结果 双钢板内固定组随访8～56个月,平均27.6个月;人工全肘关节置换组随访15～54个月,平均28.2个月.双钢板内固定组平均屈伸范围84.5°,人工全肘关节置换组平均屈伸范围107.5°,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.007);双钢板内固定组MEPS评分平均75.5分,人工全肘关节置换组平均87.9分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.047);双钢板内固定组MEPS优良率60%,人工全肘关节置换组MEPS优良率83.3%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.348).双钢板内固定组术后并发症包括2例尺神经炎,2例异位骨化;人工全肘关节置换组术后并发症包括1例尺神经炎,1例肱三头肌肌力减弱,1例异位骨化.结论 对老年肱骨髁间C型骨折,一期行人工全肘关节置换术较双钢板内固定能获得更好的疗效.

Abstract：

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) for type C inter-condylar fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. Methods Twenty-two patients who were treated with ORIF or TEA from April 2003 to September 2009 were included in the study. All fractures were OTA classification 13C. Among them, 10 patients who were treated with ORIF were follow up for 8-56 months, while 12 patients who were treated with TEA were followed up for 15-54 months. The Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the complications were compared. Results Using the MEPS, there were 2 in excellent, 4 in good, 4 in fair in the patients treated with ORIF. Complications included heterotopic ossifications (2 cases) and ulnar nerve dysfunction (2 cases).There were 6 in excellent, 4 in good, 2 in fair in the patients treated with TEA. Complications included 1heterotopic ossification (1 case), ulnar nerve dysfunction (1 case), the weakness of musculus triceps brachii (1 case). The patients treated with TEA had significantly better range of motion (107.5° vs 84.5°, P=0.007),also had better MEPS (87.9 vs 75.5, P=0.047) than those with ORIF had ones. Conclusion TEA is a liable option for type C inter-condylar fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly.     

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus involving the capitellum and trochlea treated with open reduction internal fixation

Introduction

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus involving the capitellum and trochlea are rare. Treatments have evolved from closed reduction to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to achieve a stable joint that allows early mobilization.

Background

We determined the functional outcomes of treating coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus with ORIF.

Methods

We reviewed the records of all patients with coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus treated by ORIF. Fractures were classified according to Bryan and Morrey. Cannulated screws were used for fixation. All patients were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Score Performance Index (MEPI) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores at least 1 year later.

Results

Of the 18 patients evaluated (12 women), the mean (SD) age was 45.3(16.5) years (range 16–70). There were seven Type-I, five Type-III, and six Type-IV fractures. Mean follow-up was 43.6 (38.1) months (range 12–120). The mean elbow range of motion in sagittal plane at last follow-up ranged from 8.9° to 132.8°. The mean MEPI score was 86.7 (15.2) points (range 60–100), corresponding to 12 excellent, 2 good, and 4 fair outcomes. The mean DASH score was 15.3 (13.5) points (range 17–35.8). Heterotrophic ossification developed in one patient with delayed fixation; 14 patients with excellent or good results returned to their previous activity levels. Functional scores did not differ by age, sex, or fracture types (P > 0.05 for all comparisons).

Conclusion

ORIF with cannulated screws, which maintain a stable anatomic articular position, provides satisfactory results in coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus.

Level of evidence

Level IV case series.     

Is primary total elbow arthroplasty safe for the treatment of open intra-articular distal humerus fractures?

ObjectivesTotal elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a viable treatment for elderly patients with distal humerus fracture who frequently present with low-grade open fractures. This purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a protocol of serial irrigations and debridements (I&Ds) followed by primary TEA for the treatment of open intra-articular distal humerus fractures.MethodsSeven patients (mean 74 years; range 56–86 years) with open (two Grade I and five Grade 2) distal humerus fractures (OTA 13C) who were treated between 2001 and 2007 with a standard staged protocol that included TEA were studied. Baseline Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were obtained during the initial hospitalization, and the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were obtained at each follow-up visit.ResultsFollow-up averaged 43 (range 4–138) months. There were no wound complications and no deep infections. Complications included one case of heterotopic ossification with joint contracture, one olecranon fracture unrelated to the TEA, and two loose humeral stems. The average final ROM was from 21° (range 5–30°) to 113° flexion (range 90–130°). DASH scores averaged 25 at pre-injury baseline and 48 at the most recent follow-up visits.ConclusionsTEA has become a mainstream option for the treatment of distal humerus fractures which are on occasion open. There is hesitation in using arthroplasty in an open fracture setting due to a potential increased infection risk. The absence of any infectious complications and satisfactory functional outcomes observed in the current series indicates that TEA is a viable treatment modality for complex open fractures of the distal humerus.     

Distal humerus fractures in the elderly: osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis? Review of the literature

Fractures of the distal humerus in adults are rare but challenging for the orthopaedic trauma surgeon. The bimodal distribution reflects the trauma mechanism. While distal humerus fractures are caused by high-energy traumata in young male adults, a fall from a standing height is the most common reason for humerus fractures among elderly females. As a rule, fractures of the distal humerus are treated surgically. In young patients, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with anatomic locking plates are the gold standard. In elderly patients, reconstruction is not always possible, and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) becomes necessary. The present article provides an overview of the current diagnostic and treatment recommendations. The current literature is reviewed and the results discussed.     

Treatment trends in distal humerus fractures between ABOS part II candidates

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine how fellowship training influences the treatment of distal humerus fractures with either total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).MethodsThe American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Examination Database was queried for all orthopaedic surgeons who sat for the Part II examination between the years 2003-2019. Inclusion criteria were ORIF or TEA cases, selected by individual CPT codes for each procedure, and patients of at least age 65 years who sustained acute distal humerus fractures. Analysis was performed for each type of fellowship training completed, total number of procedures performed, the type of procedure performed, patient demographics, and any complications.ResultsThere were 149 TEAs and 1306 ORIFs performed for distal humerus fractures between the exam years of 2003-2019. The proportion of TEA to ORIF increased from 7.6% to 11.0%. Partitioned by fellowship training, Hand and Upper Extremity surgeons performed 69 (17.4%) TEAs and 328 (82.6%) ORIFs, Shoulder and Elbow surgeons performed 34 (29.6%) TEAs and 81 (70.4%) ORIFs, Sports Medicine surgeons performed 14 (5.1%) TEAs and 263 (94.6%) ORIFs, and Trauma surgeons performed 16 (4.2%) TEAs and 366 (95.8%) ORIFs. Hand and Upper Extremity surgeons treated the most distal humerus fractures (397, 27.3%), followed by Trauma surgeons (382, 26.3%).ConclusionOur data suggests that fellowship training does influence the surgical decision-making process for treating distal humerus fractures in elderly populations. Hand and Upper Extremity surgeons performed the greatest number of TEA for acute distal humerus fractures, followed by Shoulder and Elbow surgeons. Conversely, trauma surgeons performed the lowest proportion of TEA to ORIF.Level of EvidenceIII.     

Results of total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in elderly Asian patients

BACKGROUND: Distal humerus fractures in elderly patients are difficult to treat as these fractures are often complicated by varying degrees of comminution intra-articular involvement and osteoporosis. We retrospectively reviewed the results of primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in seven patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. METHODS: Between July 2000 and June 2002, seven patients with distal humerus fractures were treated electively with total elbow arthroplasty using the semiconstrained Coonrad-Moorey elbow replacement prostheses. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to assess the outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 72.9 years. The mean duration of postoperative hospitalization stay was 7.6 days. The average length of follow up was 24.9 months. Six of these patients had no pain, and one patient had mild pain. The mean arc of flexion was 88.6 degrees. Six elbows had excellent results, while 1 elbow had good result. The mean Mayo score was 94.3 points. One elbow developed blisters postoperatively but resolved with dressings and antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests that total elbow arthroplasty can give good to excellent short term results when used in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in elderly Asian patients.     

Management of distal humerus fractures

Fractures of the distal humerus are complex injuries that can be effectively treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORiF). Exposure of a complex intra-articular fracture may best be achieved through a posterior approach with osteotomy of the olecranon process. The ulnar nerve must be identified and protected, the articular surface must be reduced anatomically, and rigid fixation must be applied to both the medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus. Range of motion should be initiated as soon as possible postoperatively. Complications such as ulnar neuropathy, elbow stiffness, heterotopic ossification, and nonunion should be treated aggressively. Total elbow arthroplasty represents an effective option for fractures that cannot be treated with ORIF.     

Surgical approaches for open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundA number of surgical approaches have been described for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of intra-articular distal humerus (IDH) fractures in adults. However, there is no consensus as to which approach is better in terms of functional outcomes and complications. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the functional outcomes and types and rates of complications are influenced by the choice of surgical approach for ORIF of IDH fractures (AO/OTA types 13 B & C).MethodsA systematic review of literature was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. Studies, both prospective and retrospective and comparative or non-comparative, dealing with surgical approaches for ORIF of IDH fractures in adult patients were included. Conference abstracts, studies looking primarily at the results of internal fixation rather than the surgical approach, those including extra-articular distal humeral fractures, pediatric distal humeral fractures (<18 years of age), delayed unions, non unions, malunions, cadaveric studies, pathological fractures and studies with <10 patients were excluded. Studies that looked at surgical modalities other than internal fixation (for e.g. total elbow arthroplasty) for intra-articular distal humerus fractures or those that did not report a validated functional outcome scoring system were also excluded.Results11 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, of which 5 were comparative studies and 6 were non-comparative. Quantitative analysis was performed on two sets of two studies, each set comparing the Bryan and Morrey or the triceps-split approach to the olecranon osteotomy approach, and revealed no significant differences in the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, range of motion and rates of complications. The overall methodological quality of the studies included in the review was low.ConclusionsHigh-quality evidence on surgical approaches for ORIF of IDH fractures in adults is lacking. Evidence from low-quality studies indicates that there is no difference in the functional outcomes or complication rates when comparing the Bryan and Morrey or triceps-split to the olecranon osteotomy approach. Future research in the form of high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed to determine which approach is superior in terms of functional outcomes and complications.     

Surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus. Functional outcome after twelve to thirty years

BACKGROUND: The short-term results of open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal humeral fractures are good to excellent in approximately 75% of patients, but the long-term results have been less well studied. This investigation addressed the long-term clinical and radiographic results of surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures (AO Type C) as assessed with use of standardized outcome measures. METHODS: Thirty patients were evaluated at an average of nineteen years (range, twelve to thirty years) after open reduction and internal fixation of a fracture of the distal part of the humerus to assess the range of elbow motion and the functional outcome. Twenty patients had an olecranon osteotomy, and all had fixation with plates and/or screws and/or Kirschner wires. No ulnar nerve was transposed. RESULTS: Excluding one elbow salvaged with an arthrodesis and counted as a poor result, the average final flexion arc was 106 degrees and the average pronation-supination arc was 165 degrees. The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 96 points, with an average satisfaction score of 8.8 points on a 0 to 10-point visual analog scale. The average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 7 points, and the average Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score was 91 points. Including the patient with the arthrodesis, the final categorical ratings were nineteen excellent results, seven good results, one fair result, and three poor results. The presence of arthrosis did not appear to correlate with pain or predict disability or function. Subsequent procedures were performed in twelve patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of open reduction and internal fixation of AO-Type-C fractures of the distal part of the humerus are similar to those reported in the short term, suggesting that the results are durable. Functional ratings and perceived disability were predicated more on pain than on functional impairment and did not correlate with radiographic signs of arthrosis.     

Primärer endoprothetischer Ellbogengelenkersatz bei komplexen intraartikulären distalen Humerusfrakturen

Introduction

Open reduction and internal fixation of multifragmentary intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus often do not provide satisfactory results in elderly patients with osteoporosis.

Method

From December 2001 to January 2008 a total elbow arthroplasty (Coonrad-Morrey, Zimmer, USA) was performed on 12 patients (average age 81±9  ears) who presented with a type C distal humeral fracture. The mean time of follow-up with clinical and radiological assessment was 28±17 months.

Results

The Mayo score showed a good functional result with an average of 81±9 out of 100. DASH and SECEC scores showed a fair result with respect to elbow function (43±8 and 68±7 points, respectively). The average range of motion of all patients was 120-33-0°. Heterotopic ossifications were found by X-ray examination in 4 cases and asymptomatic radiolucent lines in 4 cases.

Conclusion

Primary total elbow arthroplasty for complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures in elderly patients has good functional results and is an alternative to osteosynthesis.     

Non-operative management of distal humerus fractures in the elderly: a review of functional outcomes

Comminuted distal humerus fractures in the elderly have traditionally been managed by ORIF or total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). This poses a treatment dilemma in elderly patients where anaesthetic and surgical risks combine with poor bone and wound healing. We aimed to assess the functional outcomes in patients managed non-operatively, with TEA being used as the salvage procedure. Retrospective analysis of patients over 65 years presenting to our unit between 2005 and 2015 was undertaken. Sixty-two patients were identified, 38 had died, and 5 were lost to follow-up leaving 5 with immediate TEA and 14 non-operatively managed, available for review. Mean follow-up was 55 months (range 17–131). Patient outcomes were measured using VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity, and the Oxford elbow score (OES) for TEA and non-operatively managed patients. Conversion to TEA for non-operative treatment and complications were also recorded. Notes interrogation of patients who had died or were lost to follow-up to ascertain outcomes was undertaken. The mean age at injury was 76 years (range 65–90) of which 79% (11/14) were females. The mean score on the OES was 46.2 (range 29–48). The mean VAS score at rest was 0.4 (range 0–6), and the mean VAS score during activity was 1.3 (range 0–9). 93% (13/14) of patients reported no pain in their injured elbow at rest and 79% (11/14) reported no pain during activity. No patients converted to TEA, and there were no complications. Of deceased patients, notes demonstrated one who had ongoing stiffness after physiotherapy, but no conversions to TEA were undertaken. Those managed primarily with TEA had worse OES (mean 40.8), but slightly better pain scores with means 0.2 at rest and 0.8 at activity. Non-operative management of comminuted distal humerus fractures should be considered for elderly patients, avoiding surgical risks whilst giving satisfactory functional outcomes in this low-demand group.     

Functional outcome of unstable distal radius fractures: ORIF with a volar fixed-angle tine plate versus external fixation

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of 2 treatments for unstable distal radius fractures: open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) through a volar approach with a fixed-angle implant and a standard external fixation (EF) method. METHODS: This study included patients with comminuted unstable intra-articular and extra-articular distal radius fractures treated by a single surgeon. Data were gathered retrospectively on 11 patients treated with EF who had been followed up for an average of 47 months (range, 12-84 mo). Prospective data were gathered on 21 patients who were treated with ORIF through a volar approach with a fixed-angle implant. Follow-up evaluation for this group averaged 17 months (range, 12-24 mo). The 2 groups were compared for range of motion (ROM), strength, and functional outcome as measured by the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). Fracture reduction was evaluated from radiographs taken at the last follow-up visit and compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean passive wrist ROM at the final follow-up evaluation in EF patients was 59 degrees extension and 57 degrees flexion, compared with 63 degrees extension and 64 degrees flexion in patients treated with ORIF. Passive pronation/supination arc of motion was similar for the 2 groups, as were the DASH and PRWE scores. Grip strength as a percentage of the opposite wrist was significantly greater in the external fixation group, a possible consequence of longer follow-up evaluation. Final radiographic measurements for the EF group averaged 5 degrees volar tilt and 25 degrees radial inclination, with 2.2-mm ulnar-positive variance. The ORIF with volar plating group averaged 10 degrees volar tilt and 22 degrees radial inclination, with .5-mm ulnar-negative variance. Radial length and volar tilt were significantly greater for the ORIF group. The average final intra-articular step-off was significantly different, with 1.4-mm step-off in the EF group and .4 mm in the ORIF group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ORIF with a volar fixed-angle implant resulted in stable fixation of the distal articular fragments, allowing early postsurgical wrist motion. The PRWE and DASH scores for the groups were equivalent, whereas intra-articular step-off, volar tilt, and radial length were better in the ORIF group. There were few complications, implant removal was not necessary, and early postsurgical wrist ROM was initiated without loss of reduction.     

Coonrad-Morrey半限制型假体全肘关节置换的临床应用

目的 探讨Coonrad-Morrey型半限制型假体全肘关节置换术的疗效.方法 2003年12月至2008年4月采用Coonrad-Morrey半限制型假体治疗肘部疾患30例(31肘),其中新鲜肱骨髁间骨折18例,髁间骨折内固定失效或骨折不愈合9例,类风湿性肘关节炎(RA)2例(3肘),骨性关节炎(OA)1例;其中男性8例,女性22例;年龄47～78岁,平均66岁.结果 20例(21肘)获得随访,均为骨折患者,平均随访35个月(12～52个月),术前因疼痛无法判断Mayo肘关节功能评分(MEPS评分),术后MEPS评分平均为84分;21肘中,6肘优(28%),11肘良(52%),2肘可(10%),2肘差(10%).优良率80%.并发症:1例术后发生"针-针系统"失效,1例术后切口迟延愈合,1例尺神经支配区域感觉减退,2例异位骨化.结论 全肘关节置换治疗肘关节损伤可解除疼痛、恢复稳定性及改善活动范围.对于老年肱骨髁间粉碎性骨折及骨折不愈合,严格选择病例,可获得较满意疗效.     

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Elbow Arthroplasty Using a Semi-constrained Prosthesis with a Triceps-preserving Approach over a Minimum Follow-up Period of 4 Years

Objective

Complications related to triceps after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) have become a major surgical concern. The triceps-preserving approach has the advantage of not disturbing the insertion of triceps but is disadvantaged by the reduced exposure of the elbow joint. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of TEA with a triceps-preserving approach and to compare the outcomes of TEA to treat arthropathy with that of TEA to treat acute distal humerus fracture.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2018, 23 patients undergoing primary TEAs were retrospectively reviewed with a mean follow-up time of 92.6 months (range, 52–136 months). Each TEA was performed using the triceps-preserving approach with a semi-constrained Coonrad–Morrey prosthesis. Patient demographics, range of motion (ROM), pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and triceps strength (Medical Research Council [MRC] scale) were compared before and after surgery. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, radiographic outcome, and complications were evaluated at follow-up.

Results

In total, seven males and 16 females were included in this study, with a mean age of 66.1 years (range:46–85 years). By the last follow-up, pain had been significantly relieved in all patients. The average MEPS in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 90.8 ± 10.3 points (range: 68–98 points) and 91.7 ± 0.4 (range: 76–100 points), respectively. The average DASH of the arthropathy group and fracture group was 37.3 ± 18.8 points (range: 18–52 points) and 38.4 ± 20.1 (range: 16–60 points). At the last follow-up after surgery, the mean flexion arcs in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 100.4° ± 24.1° and 97.8° ± 28.1°, respectively. The mean pro-supination arcs in the arthropathy group and fracture group were 142.4° ± 15.2° and 139.2° ± 17.5°, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups (P ≥ 0.05). Triceps strength was normal (MRC grade V) in 15 elbows and good in eight elbows. None of the cases experienced weakness of the triceps strength, infection, periprosthetic fractures, or prosthesis breakage.

Conclusions

The clinical and radiographical outcomes of TEA with the triceps-preserving approach were satisfactory in patients with distal humerus fracture, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.     

Sekundäre Endoprothetik des Ellenbogengelenks nach distaler Humerusfraktur

Good short-term results have been reported for primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) but implant longevity is limited. Therefore, primary TEA should be reserved in particular for older patients with severe comminuted distal humeral fractures in whom successful osteosynthesis is often impossible. Angular locking compression plates afford stable fracture fixation even for a severe intra-articular fracture pattern. To date primary TEA for treatment of severe distal humeral fractures is rarely used. Secondary TEA is used in failed osteosynthesis of distal humeral fractures and in unstable post-traumatic elbow joints with osteoarthrosis. Additionally, secondary TEA has become more popular in younger patients for immediate pain reduction and functional improvement. However, weight bearing is limited to 5 kg, racket sports are prohibited and good patient compliance is mandatory. Long-term results of TEA are poorer for trauma patients than those with rheumatoid arthritis.     

A review of the surgical management of distal humerus fractures and nonunions: From fixation to arthroplasty

Distal humeral fractures in adults are challenging injuries. They often require surgical intervention in form of internal fixation or total elbow arthroplasty which is being increasingly used in physiologically elderly patients with comminuted fractures. Careful preoperative evaluation including type of fracture, quality of bone, pre-existing conditions and functional demand help in deciding optimal treatment. CT scans including 2D and 3D reconstructions are almost mandatory in proper planning of the surgical treatment. In most cases with a healthy physiologically young patient, ORIF is the treatment of choice. Biomechanical studies have shown that parallel plating resists rotational deformity to a greater degree than 90/90 plating allowing supracondylar union. Accurate realignment of articular fragments and compression at the supracondylar area is key to the success of the internal fixation. Main cause of failure of fixation is the nonunion or malunion in the supracondylar area. The principles described by O'Driscoll et al. allow for rigid fixation of the distal articular fragments and compression at the supracondylar level which is vital to healing and the prevention of hardware failure, and nonunion. Olecranon osteotomy improves the expodure of distal humeral articular surface but has its own share of problems and should be avoided if possible. Irritation of ulnar nerve is a common complication so it should be isolated, kept under vision throughout and if necessary, transposed anteiriorly. Nonunion or malunion of supracondylar fractures can be treated by revision ORIF or total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Supracondylar shortening, bone grafting and contracture release are important elements of treatment of nonunions.In unreconstructable distal humerus fractures, where open reduction and internal fixation is not possible due to the small size of the fragments, severe comminution and/or poor bone quality, TEA is the treatment of choice. Triceps can be left intact as the excision of fractured fragments usually provide enough space to carry out the operation. Sometimes, the decision to perform TEA is only made after exposing the fracture so the surgeon should be comfortable in performing TEA if ORIF is not possible; and necessary instruments and implants should be available on the shelf. In spite of satisfactory outcome, overall complication rate after TEA remains high and makes surgical efficiency and technical competence of utmost importance.     

Triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle approach with double precontoured locking plate fixation is efficient in the treatment of orthopaedic trauma association type C distal humerus fracture

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine if the triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle (TRAP) approach combined with the precontoured locking plate can provide acceptable clinical outcomes in the treatment of comminuted distal humerus fracture.MethodsBetween August 2008 and June 2014, 48 patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C (21 with C2, 27 with C3) distal humerus fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with orthogonal precontoured locking plate fixation using the TRAP approach. Occurrences of bony union, implant failure, posttraumatic arthrosis, and heterotopic ossification were detected with radiography. Clinical assessment included evaluation of range of motion and determination of the pain score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, and Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.ResultsThe fractures healed within 3 months in 25 patients (53%) and within 6 months in 23 patients (47%). The 12-month assessment revealed improved elbow movement, with the mean arc of flexion-extension of 121° (range, 100°–140°), mean arc of supination-pronation of 163° (range, 150°–180°), and mean flexion contracture of 8° (range, 0°–30°). The mean MEPI score was 81 and the mean DASH score was 11.7.ConclusionsBy retaining the intact olecranon by the TRAP approach, orthopedic surgeon can get adequate surgical exposure for fracture fixation and can use olecranon as a three-dimensional template to restore the articular fragments. The promising results in this study obtain because that precise identification of the triceps muscle allowed the determination of a proper length-tension relationship for triceps reattachment. The combination of triceps tendon repair and anconeous muscle repair ensured the strength of the extensor mechanism. Therefore, the TRAP approach in combination with the usage of the precontoured locking plate can be recommended as the optimal surgical approach for the treatment of comminuted distal humerus fracture.     

Bilateral triceps tendon approach is flexible and efficient in the treatment of type C distal humerus fractures

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess and compare elbow range of motion, triceps extension strength and functional results of type C (AO/OTA) distal humerus fractures treated with bilateral triceps tendon (BTT) approach and olecranon osteotomy (OO). At the same time, we are also trying to know whether BTT approach can provide sufficient vision for comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus, and whether it is convenient to convert to the treatment to total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) or OO.MethodsPatients treated with OO and BTT approaches for type C distal humerus fractures between July 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria include: (1) patients' age were more than 18 years old, (2) follow-up was no less than 6 months, and (3) patients were diagnosed with type C fractures (based on the AO/OTA classification). Exclusion criteria include: (1) open fractures (Gustillo type 2 or type 3), (2) treated by other approaches, and (3) presented with combined injuries of ipsilateral upper extremities, such as ulnar nerve. Elbow range of motion and triceps extension strength testing were completely valuated, when the fractures had healed. Assessment of functional results using the Mayo elbow performance score and complications were conducted in final follow-up. The data were compared using the two tailed Student's t-test. All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation.ResultsEighty-six patients of type C distal humerus fractures, treated by OO and BTT approach were retrospectively reviewed between July 2014 and December 2017. Fifty-five distal humerus fractures (23 males and 32 females, mean age 52.7 years) treated by BTT approach or OO were included in this study. There were 10 fractures of type C1, 16 type C2 and 29 type C3 according to the AO/OTA classification. Patients were divided into two surgical approach groups chosen by the operators: BTT group (28 patients) and OO group (27 patients). And the mean follow-up time of all patients was 15.6 months (range, 6–36 months). Three cases in BTT group were converted to TEA, and one converted to OO. Only one case in BTT group presented poor articular reduction with a step more than 2 mm. There were not significantly different in functional outcomes according to the Mayo elbow performance score, operation time and extension flexion motion are values between BTT group and OO group (p > 0.05). Complications and reoperation rate were also similar in the two groups. Triceps manual muscle testing were no significant difference in the two groups, even subdivided in elder patients (aged >60 years old).ConclusionBTT is a safe approach to achieve similar functional result comparing with OO. BTT were not suitable for every case with severe comminuted pattern, but it avoids the potential complications related to OO, and has no complications concerning with triceps tendon. It is convenient for open reduction internal fixation and flexible to be converted to OO, as well as available to be converted to TEA in elder patients.