Radiation doses to patients during selected CT procedures at four hospitals in Tanzania

The dose characteristics of CT scanners from local scanning protocols were investigated on the basis of questionnaire information provided by four hospitals conducting CT procedures in Tanzania. The information included scanner model, scanner manufacturer, number of most frequent CT examinations and the employed scanning parameters to previously diagnosed patients. For each scan technique, patient doses were estimated in terms of computerized tomography dose index, dose length product and effective dose using the software developed by the ImPACT scan group in conjunction with the NRPB conversion coefficients data. The results show that the mean CTDI_w,100, DLP and effective dose ranged from 8.5 +/- 2.8 to 79.3 +/- 23.7mGy, 145 +/- 5 to 1400 +/- 812.5 mGy cm and 3 +/- 2.3 to 15.7 +/- 10.4 mSv, respectively. On average, the observed CT doses are however roughly higher than the reported literature data such as 30 to 60 mGy, 570 to 1050 mGy cm and 2.4 to 11.7 mSv recommended by European Commission for similar CT examinations. The higher dose levels, which are possibly associated with significant risks, justify extensive similar studies at the national level in order to unify different approaches towards optimisation of CT examinations. In pursue of this noble objective, the need to train the radiology personnel, establish and using protocols and continuously monitor the performance of CT equipment to control patient CT doses is of utmost importance.     

Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia

As part of the dose optimization process, the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 include requirements relating to the assessment of patient dose, and the setting and subsequent review of diagnostic reference levels. In East Anglia, audits of effective dose in CT have been carried out in 1996, 1999 and 2002. In the 2002 audit, nine of the 14 scanners assessed had been replaced since the previous audit. Eight of the new scanners were multislice scanners, acquiring up to 16 slices in a single rotation. The objective of the 2002 audit was to investigate the effect of the introduction of these multislice scanners on patient doses from routine CT examinations. Exposure parameters were collected for 10 different types of routine CT examination. In excess of 550 sets of patient data were obtained. For each of these, effective doses were calculated using the results of Monte Carlo simulations published by the National Radiological Protection Board. Averaged across all 10 examinations, regional mean effective doses are 34% higher than in 1999. The multislice scanners in the region give, on average, 35% more effective dose than the single-slice scanners. The effect of collimation in multislice scanners makes these effective dose differences most notable for examinations that use narrow slice widths. Further optimization of exposures on multislice scanners has the potential to reduce the differences observed between single-slice and multislice doses. However, when taken in combination with the increased use of CT in many hospitals, the effective dose increases observed are likely to result in a significant increase in the already substantial collective radiation dose from CT.     

Current CT practice in Germany: Results and implications of a nationwide survey

PurposeTo assess patient doses and relative frequencies of standard CT examinations performed in Germany in 2013/14 as well as the effect of modern CT technology on patient exposure.MethodsAll known CT facilities in Germany were requested to complete a questionnaire on the frequency of 34 examinations and the respective parameter settings used. Taking into account type-specific properties of each scanner, effective doses were estimated for each reported examination. The mean and the percentiles of the CT dose index, scan length, dose length product, and effective dose were determined for each type of examination.ResultsAccording to the data provided for about 11% of all medical CT scanners operated in 2013/14, the effective dose was 4.6/5.9 mSv per scan/examination. The effective dose was significantly reduced by about 15% compared to the CT practice before 2010. Modern CT technology, such as tube current modulation and iterative image reconstruction reduced the effective dose significantly by 6% and 13%, respectively. The mean effective dose applied at scanners produced by different manufacturers differed by 25%, at maximum.ConclusionPatient exposure was reduced substantially in recent years. There is, however, still a considerable potential for further dose reduction by adapting scan protocols to the medical purpose and by a consequent exploitation of modern CT technologies.     

Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Columbia.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the diagnostic reference levels and effective radiation dose to patients from routine computed tomography (CT) examinations in the province of British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: The patient weight, height and computed tomography dose index or dose linear product (DLP) were recorded on study sheets for 1070 patients who were referred for clinically indicated routine CT examinations at 18 radiology departments in British Columbia. Sixteen of the scanners were multidetector row scanners. RESULTS: The average patient dose varied from hospital to hospital. The largest range was found for CT of the abdomen, for which the dose varied from 3.6 to 26.5 (average 10.1) mSv. For head CT, the range was 1.7 to 4.9 (average 2.8) mSv; for chest CT, it was 3.8 to 26 (average 9.3) mSv; for pelvis CT, it was 3.5 to 15.5 (average 9.0) mSv; and for abdomen-pelvis CT, it was 7.3 to 31.5 (average 16.3) mSv. Reference dose values were calculated for each exam. These DLP values are as follows: head, 1300 mGy cm; chest, 600 mGy cm; abdomen, 920 mGy cm; pelvis, 650 mGy cm; and abdomen-pelvis, 1100 mGy cm. CONCLUSION: Among hospitals, there was considerable variation in the DLP and patient radiation dose for a specific exam. Reference doses and patient doses were higher than those found in similar recent surveys carried out in the United Kingdom and the European Union. Patient doses were similar to those found in a recent survey in Germany.     

Radiation dose evaluation in 64-slice CT examinations with adult and paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms

The objective of this study was to evaluate the organ dose and effective dose to patients undergoing routine adult and paediatric CT examinations with 64-slice CT scanners and to compare the doses with those from 4-, 8- and 16-multislice CT scanners. Patient doses were measured with small (<7 mm wide) silicon photodiode dosemeters (34 in total), which were implanted at various tissue and organ positions within adult and 6-year-old child anthropomorphic phantoms. Output signals from photodiode dosemeters were read on a personal computer, from which organ and effective doses were computed. For the adult phantom, organ doses (for organs within the scan range) and effective doses were 8–35 mGy and 7–18 mSv, respectively, for chest CT, and 12–33 mGy and 10–21 mSv, respectively, for abdominopelvic CT. For the paediatric phantom, organ and effective doses were 4–17 mGy and 3–7 mSv, respectively, for chest CT, and 5–14 mGy and 3–9 mSv, respectively, for abdominopelvic CT. Doses to organs at the boundaries of the scan length were higher for 64-slice CT scanners using large beam widths and/or a large pitch because of the larger extent of over-ranging. The CT dose index (CTDI_vol), dose–length product (DLP) and the effective dose values using 64-slice CT for the adult and paediatric phantoms were the same as those obtained using 4-, 8- and 16-slice CT. Conversion factors of DLP to the effective dose by International Commission on Radiological Protection 103 were 0.024 mSv⋅mGy⁻¹⋅cm⁻¹ and 0.019 mSv⋅mGy⁻¹⋅cm⁻¹ for adult chest and abdominopelvic CT scans, respectively.X-ray CT scanners have made remarkable advances over the past few years, contributing to the improvement of diagnostic image quality and the reduction of examination time. CT scanners with 64 slices, the clinical use of which started quite recently in many medical facilities, has enabled a large number of thin slices to be acquired in a single rotation. 64-slice CT technology accelerated the practical use of three-dimensional body imaging techniques such as coronary CT angiography and CT colonography with an increasing number of CT examinations. The increase in CT examination frequency not only for adults but also for children and the higher doses in CT examinations compared with other X-ray diagnostic procedures have raised concerns about patient doses and safety. An understanding of patient doses requires the evaluation of organ and effective doses for patients undergoing CT examinations, although these dose values in 64-slice CT scans have seldom been reported.One common method for estimating organ and effective doses is dose calculation from the CT dose index (CTDI) or dose–length product (DLP), which are both used as readily available indicators of radiation dose in CT examinations. Organ and effective doses can be estimated from the CTDI or DLP, and conversion factors derived from Monte Carlo simulation of photon interactions within a simplified mathematical model of the human body [1]. Another method is based on measurement using thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) implanted in various organ positions within an anthropomorphic phantom [2–6]. Although TLD dosimetry is considered to be the standard method for measuring absorbed doses in a phantom, the dose measurement is laborious and time consuming. Hence, we devised an in-phantom dosimetry system using silicon photodiode dosemeters implanted in various organ positions, where absorbed dose at each position could be read electronically. In the present study, we evaluated organ and effective doses with 64-slice CT scan protocols used clinically for adult and paediatric patients undergoing chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. We compared the doses with published dose values for 4-, 8- and 16-slice CT, and indicated the conversion factor of DLP to the effective dose in each examination of the chest and abdomen–pelvis for 64-slice CT scanners.     

Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols

This paper reviews the reasons why multi-slice CT scanners may give patients higher dose than their single-slice predecessors and discusses the type of optimization of multi-slice scan protocols that may be undertaken to keep patient doses to acceptable levels without compromising image quality. It also provides estimates of patient effective dose values and dose length products for typical procedures and briefly discusses the implication that these dose values have for the induction of possible stochastic effects.     

Comparison of the sensitivities of 5 different computed tomography scanners for the assessment of the progression of pulmonary emphysema: a phantom study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivities of 5 different computed tomography scanners (4 multislice CT [MSCT] and 1 single-slice CT) in the assessment of the progression of pulmonary emphysema. METHODS: A Perspex cylinder phantom was constructed containing small pieces of polythene foam with densities representative of lung. Changing the cylinder's volume simulated subtle lung density changes. The sensitivity to density changes was defined by the variation in the residual errors from the linear regression line between time and density. RESULTS: The single-slice CT scanner was significantly less sensitive to density changes than MSCT scanners. Also, among MSCT scanners, small but significant differences were found when the standardized acquisition protocol was used. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the large sensitivity differences between single- and multislice CT scanners, we would recommended using MSCT scanners in clinical multicenter trials in emphysema. The protocol standardization of MSCT scanners can still be further improved.     

National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003

A review of patient doses from CT examinations in the UK for 2003 has been conducted on the basis of data received from over a quarter of all UK scanners, of which 37% had multislice capability. Questionnaires were employed to collect scan details both for the standard protocols established at each scanner for 12 common types of CT examination on adults and children, and for samples of individual patients. This information was combined with published scanner-specific CT dose index (CTDI) coefficients to estimate values of the standard dose indices CTDI(w) and CTDI(vol) for each scan sequence. Knowledge of each scan length allowed assessment of the dose-length product (DLP) for each examination, from which effective doses were then estimated. When compared with a previous UK survey for 1991, wide variations were still apparent between CT centres in the doses for standard protocols. The mean UK doses for adult patients were in general lower by up to 50% than those for 1991, although doses were slightly higher for multislice (4+) (MSCT) relative to single slice (SSCT) scanners. Values of CTDI(vol) for MSCT were broadly similar to European survey data for 2001. The third quartile values of these dose distributions have been used to derive UK national reference doses for examinations on adults (separately for SSCT and MSCT) and children as initial tools for promoting patient protection. The survey has established the PREDICT (Patient Radiation Exposure and Dose in CT) database as a sustainable national resource for monitoring dose trends in CT through the ongoing collation of further survey data.     

Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography

Estimating the dose delivered to the patient in X-ray computed tomography (CT) examinations is not a trivial task. Monte Carlo (MC) methods appear to be the method of choice to assess the 3D dose distribution. The purpose of this work was to extend an existing MC-based tool to account for arbitrary scanners and scan protocols such as multi-slice CT (MSCT) scanners and to validate the tool in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. The tool was validated by measurements on MSCT scanners for different scan protocols under known conditions. Quantitative CT Dose Index (CTDI) measurements were performed in cylindrical CTDI phantoms and in anthropomorphic thorax phantoms of various sizes; dose profiles were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) in the CTDI phantoms and compared with the computed dose profiles. The in-plane dose distributions were simulated and compared with TLD measurements in an Alderson-Rando phantom. The calculated dose values were generally within 10% of measurements for all phantoms and all investigated conditions. Three-dimensional dose distributions can be accurately calculated with the MC tool for arbitrary scanners and protocols including tube current modulation schemes. The use of the tool has meanwhile also been extended to further scanners and to flat-detector CT.     

Radiation dose evaluation in multidetector-row CT imaging for acute stroke with an anthropomorphic phantom

This study evaluated radiation dose and dose reduction in CT imaging for acute stroke. Radiation doses in three types of CT imaging (i.e. non-contrast-enhanced CT, CT perfusion (CTP) and CT angiography (CTA)) were measured with an in-phantom dosimetry system for 4-, 16- and 64-detector CT scanners in 5 hospitals. To examine the relationship between image quality and radiation dose in CTA, image contrast-to-noise ratio was evaluated. Doses to the brain, lens, salivary glands and local skin obtained with scan protocols in routine use were: 42-71 mGy, 30-88 mGy, 3.9-7.3 mGy and 40-97 mGy in non-contrast-enhanced CT; 41-75 mGy, 9.9-10 mGy, 1.5-2.1 mGy and 107-143 mGy in CTP; and 8.2-55 mGy, 26-69 mGy, 2.0-73 mGy and 32-72 mGy in CTA. For the combination of these CT examinations, on average a patient would receive 236 mGy for the maximum local skin dose and 4.2 mSv for the effective dose evaluated by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 103. Effective doses in CTP in this study were less than those obtained with representative protocols of Western countries. Average effective doses in each CT examination were not more than 1.5 mSv. The use of reduced kV and a narrow scan range would be effective in dose reduction of CTA and CTP, and intermittent scanning would be essential in CTP. Although lens and maximum local skin doses were far less than the thresholds for deterministic effects, since radiation risks would be increased in repeated CT examinations, efforts should be devoted to dose reduction in stroke CT examinations.     

Effect of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity

OBJECTIVE: In this study we analyzed the impact of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity in a tertiary care medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the productivity of two diagnostic CT scanners during the periods January 1 to August 31, 1999 (when both scanners had single-slice CT capability) and January 1 to August 31, 2000 (when one of these scanners was replaced with a multislice CT scanner). The scanners were used primarily for outpatients during the day shift and for inpatients during the evening shift; the demand for CT services was stable. For this analysis, we queried the hospital's radiology information system and identified the number of CT examinations performed during the two analysis periods. We also determined the examination mix, including proportion of enhanced and unenhanced examinations and the anatomic region examined, to ensure comparable patient populations. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The number of CT studies performed on the two scanners increased by 1772 (13.1%) from 13,548 (before multislice CT) to 15,320 (when multislice CT was available). The number of examinations enhanced with contrast media increased from 52% to 65%. Between 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., the number of CT examinations was similar on the single-slice scanners in the two periods (p > 0.05). However, in the period when multislice CT was available, the number of studies performed on the multislice scanner (5919) was 51.9% higher than those performed using the single-slice scanner (3896) (p < 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Using a multislice CT scanner leads to an increase in CT productivity, even though multislice studies are performed using more complicated protocols than are used on a single-slice CT scanner.     

Radiation Dose from Diagnostic Computed Tomography in Saskatchewan

Objective

To calculate the effective dose from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans in Saskatchewan, Canada, and compare with other reported dose levels.

Methods

Data from CT scans were collected from 12 scanners in 7 cities across Saskatchewan. The patient age, scan type, and selected technique parameters including the dose length product and the volume computed tomography dose index were collected for a 2-week period. This information then was used to calculate effective doses patients are exposed to during CT examinations. Data from 2,061 clinically indicated CT examinations were collected, and of them 1,690 were eligible for analysis. Every examination during a 2-week period was recorded without selection.

Results

The average provincial estimated patient dose was as follows: head, 2.7 mSv (638 scans; standard deviation [SD], ±1.6); chest, 11.3 mSv (376 scans; SD, ±8.9); abdomen-pelvis, 15.5 mSv (578 scans; SD, ±10.0); abdomen, 11.7 mSv (80 scans; SD, ±11.48), and pelvis, 8.6 mSv (18 scans; SD, ±6.04). Significant variation in dose between the CT scanners was observed (P = .049 for head, P = .001 for chest, and P = .034 for abdomen-pelvis).

Conclusions

Overall, the estimated dose from diagnostic CT examinations was similar to other previously published Canadian data from British Columbia. This dose varied slightly from some other published standards, including being higher than those found in a review conducted in the United Kingdom in 2003.     

Patient doses from computed tomography in Manitoba from 1977 to 1987

The number of patients undergoing computed tomographic (CT) examinations in the province of Manitoba is reported for the period 1977-1987. The annual patient throughput has increased from 4.2 per 10(3) population in 1978 to 18.2 per 10(3) population in 1987. Over the same period, the per capita population dose from CT has increased from 4.2 to 81.0 microSv. This substantial rise has occurred because of an increase in patient throughput, higher radiation doses associated with modern CT scanners and an increasing proportion of (higher dose) body CT studies. The mean patient dose on a second generation (EMI 5005) scanner was about 1.4 mSv, whereas the corresponding doses on third generation scanners operating in Manitoba were 3.9 mSv (GE 9800) and 5.6 mSv (Siemens DRH).     

Multislice CT: technical principles and future trends

Multislice scanning has substantially improved the performance of CT scanners, and thus the relation between scan duration, available scan length, and spatial resolution along the patient axis (z-axis). Near-isotropic imaging of whole organ systems is already possible with 4-slice scanners, but only with 8- to 16-slice scanners can the scan duration be shortened as well. Reconstructing overlapping thin-section data (“secondary raw data set”) provides the basis for image reconstruction in any desired plane. By using thick multiplanar reformation (MPR) techniques, image quality can be improved while keeping patient dose low. Using unfavorable scanning parameters, exposure dose can be substantially increased compared with single-slice scanning, but thick MPR and individual-dose modulation techniques can provide the basis for dose reduction. Low-kVp scanning, in particular, is useful in children and slim adults and is an excellent technique to improve image contrast in CT angiographic studies. Short spiral scans should be avoided with multislice CT since overranging (extra rotations at the beginning and end of the scan, used for data interpolation) can substantially increase patient dose. Future trends include the introduction of thinner detector rows, wider detector arrays, faster tube rotation, and area detectors than can also be used for fluoroscopy. Noise-reduction techniques and individual dose modulation will gain importance with higher isotropic resolution. Functional and perfusion imaging, as well as advanced image processing and computer-aided diagnosis programs, will add to the possibilities of the next generation of multislice CT scanners.     

Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations

Patient doses in paediatric and adult CT examinations were investigated for modern multislice CT scanners by using specially constructed in-phantom dose measuring systems. The systems were composed of 32 photodiode dosemeters embedded in various tissue and organ sites within anthropomorphic phantoms representing the bodies of 6-year-old children and adults. Organ and the effective doses were evaluated from dose values measured at these sites. In chest CT examinations, organ doses for organs within the scanning area were 2-21 mGy for children and 7-26 mGy for adults. Thyroid doses for children were frequently the highest with a maximum of 21 mGy. In abdominal CT examinations, organ doses for organs within the scanning area were 3-16 mGy for children and 10-34 mGy for adults. Effective doses evaluated for children and adults were found to be proportional to the effective mAs of CT scanners, where linear coefficients were specific to the types of CT examinations and to the manufacturers of CT scanners. Effective doses in paediatric chest CT and abdominal CT examinations were lower than those in adult examinations by a factor of two or greater on average for the same CT scanners because of the lower effective mAs adopted in paediatric examinations.     

Changing radiation dose from diagnostic computed tomography examinations in Saskatchewan

Purpose

Follow-up study to observe if provincial mean effective radiation dose for head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis (AP) computed tomographies (CTs) remained stable or changed since the initial 2006 survey.

Methods

Data were collected in July 2008 from Saskatchewan's 13 diagnostic CT scanners of 3358 CT examinations. These data included the number of scan phases and projected dose length product (DLP). Technologists compared projected DLP with 2006 reference data before scanning. Projected DLP was converted to effective dose (ED) for each head, chest, and AP CT. The total dose that the patients received with scans of multiple body parts at the same visit also was determined.

Results

The mean (± SD) provincial ED was 3.4 ± 1.6 mSv for 1023 head scans (2.7 ± 1.6 mSv in 2006), 9.6 ± 4.8 mSv for 588 chest scans (11.3 ± 8.9 mSv in 2006), and 16.1 ± 9.9 mSv for 983 AP scans (15.5 ± 10.0 mSv in 2006). Single-phase multidetector row CT ED decreased by 31% for chest scans (9.5 ± 3.9 mSv vs 13.7 ± 9.7 mSv in 2006) and 17% for AP scans (13.9 ± 6.0 mSv vs 16.8 ± 10.6 mSv in 2006) and increased by 19% for head scans (3.2 ± 1.2 mSv vs 2.7 ± 1.5 mSv in 2006). The total patient dose was highest (33.8 ± 10.1 mSv) for the 20 patients who received head, neck, chest, and AP scans during a single visit. Because of increased utilisation and the increased CT head dose, Saskatchewan per capital radiation dose from CT increased by 21% between 2006 and 2008 (1.14 vs 1.38 mSv/person per year).

Conclusion

Significant dose and variation reduction was seen for single-phase CT chest and AP examinations between 2006 and 2008, whereas CT head dose increased over the same interval. These changes, combined with increased utilisation, resulted in per capita increase in radiation dose from CT between the 2 studies.     

Effective doses in subjects undergoing computed tomography cardiac imaging with the 256-multislice CT scanner

BACKGROUND: The 256-multislice CT (256MSCT) obtains volumetric data with 128-mm coverage in a single rotation. This coverage allows satisfactory visualization of the whole heart, allowing the 256MSCT to visualize the cardiac chambers and coronary arteries by cine scan without ECG gating. These characteristics provide a solution to the problems of MSCT. Although a wider beam width provides more efficient imaging over a wider coverage area, patient doses with the 256MSCT are of considerable concern. OBJECTIVE: We assessed potential radiation exposure with the 256MSCT in a cardiac CT protocol and compared the results to those with 16- and 64MSCT (collimated 64x0.5mm using 256MSCT). METHODS: Organ or tissue doses were measured in an anthropomorphic phantom under a coronary artery imaging protocol with the 256MSCT in cine scan mode without ECG gating, and with the 16- and 64MSCT in helical scan mode with ECG gating. RESULTS: Average effective doses were 22.8mSv for the 16MSCT, 27.8mSv for the 64MSCT and 14.1mSv for the 256MSCT. The 16- and 64MSCT doses were thus approximately 1.6- and 2.0-fold higher than those of the 256MSCT. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the 256MSCT in cardiac volumetric cine imaging offers lower radiation exposure than 16- and 64MSCT, and suggests the potential of this equipment in single-beat cardiac imaging without ECG gating. This effective dose is acceptable for routine cardiac imaging.     

UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations

Objective: To assess the annual per caput and collective effective dose to the United Kingdom population from medical and dental X-ray examinations. Method: The results of a detailed survey of the frequency of X-ray examinations during the financial year 1997/1998 were combined with contemporary data on the effective doses typically received by patients. The resulting per caput and collective dose for 1997/1998 was updated to 2001/2002 by using annual statistics on the total numbers of computed tomography (CT), interventional and conventional examinations collected by the English Department of Health. Results: The annual per caput effective dose for the UK in 2001/2002 was estimated at 0.38 mSv. Over the last 10 years CT has more than doubled its contribution and is now responsible for 47% of the collective dose from medical X-rays. The contribution from conventional radiographic and fluoroscopic examinations has nearly halved to about 34%. Interventional and angiographic procedures together contribute the remaining 19%. Conclusions: The annual per caput effective dose of 0.38 mSv is low in comparison with other countries having similarly developed systems of health-care. This is due to both a lower frequency of X-ray examinations per head of population and generally lower doses in the UK than in other developed countries.     

Impact of image noise levels, scout scan dose and lens shield on image quality and radiation exposure in z-axis dose-modulated neck MSCT on 16- and 64-slice Toshiba Aquilion scanners

Objective

Assessing the impact of image noise (IN) levels, scout scan dose and lens shield use on image quality and radiation exposure in neck multislice CT (MSCT) when using z-axis dose modulation (DM).

Methods

Neck MSCT phantom studies with/without z-axis DM were performed by using different IN levels (S.D. 7.5-30 HU) and scout scan tube currents (7.5-50 mA) on Toshiba Aquilion scanners (16-/64-slice). Image quality indices were evaluated by two radiologists and radiation exposure parameters calculated. Cadaveric phantom measurements elucidated lens shield interactions with DM efficacy. The lowest dose scan protocol with diagnostic image quality was introduced into the clinical imaging routine and retrospectively evaluated in 20 age-matched patients undergoing neck MSCT with/without DM.

Results

The highest image noise level in DM neck studies with comparable image quality to standard neck CT amounted to 20 HU, resulting in a mean tube current of 50 mAs (CTDI_w 6.3 mGy). DM reduced effective dose by 35% and organ dose figures (lens, thyroid) by 33%. Scout scan dose lowering to 20 mA resulted in an effective dose (ED) decrease of 0.06 mSv (5%). Avoiding lens shield placement during scout scan effected an organ dose decrease of 20%. Overall contour sharpness and image contrast did not differ significantly (DM/without DM) whereas image noise was rated higher in DM neck CT studies (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

z-Axis dose modulation, as assessed on 16- and 64-slice Toshiba Aquilion scanners, is effective and mandatory in neck MSCT. DM efficacy can be enhanced by optimising scout scan doses and lens shield use.     

Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results

Objectives

CT is a valuable tool in diagnostic radiology but it is also associated with higher patient radiation doses compared with planar radiography. The aim of this article is to review patient dose for the most common types of CT examinations reported during the past 19 years.

Methods

Reported dosimetric quantities were compared with the European diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Effective doses were assessed with respect to the publication year and scanner technology (i.e. single-slice vs multislice).

Results

Considerable variation of reported values among studies was attributed to variations in both examination protocol and scanner design. Median weighted CT dose index (CTDI_w) and dose length product (DLP) are below the proposed DRLs; however, for individual studies the DRLs are exceeded. Median reported effective doses for the most frequent CT examinations were: head, 1.9 mSv (0.3–8.2 mSv); chest, 7.5 mSv (0.3–26.0 mSv); abdomen, 7.9 mSv (1.4–31.2 mSv); and pelvis, 7.6 mSv (2.5–36.5 mSv).

Conclusion

The introduction of mechanisms for dose reduction resulted in significantly lower patient effective doses for CT examinations of the head, chest and abdomen reported by studies published after 1995. Owing to the limited number of studies reporting patient doses for multislice CT examinations the statistical power to detect differences with single-slice scanners is not yet adequate.The use of CT in medicine is now firmly established and represents one of the most important radiological procedures performed worldwide. A consequence of the wide adoption of CT in clinical practice is that radiation dose from CT is growing as a component of the total radiation dose received by patients and the general population [1^,2]. Data from various national surveys have proved that CT is a major source of radiation exposure and provides a substantial proportion of the collective dose from medical exposure, e.g. approximately 35% in Germany [3] and 47% in the UK [4]. The introduction of faster multislice and dual source CT technology has allowed cardiac CT, large-volume high-resolution CT and improved z-plane resolution [5-8]. The speed and ease of CT imaging and the ambition to obtain quality images and cover larger areas of the patient''s anatomy can lead to increased patient doses; although technological developments provide the opportunity to decreases individual CT doses [9]. Patient radiation dose owing to CT examination is expected to be highly variable because of the use of different imaging protocols and the intrinsic differences among makes and models of CT scanners [10^,11]. To limit radiation exposure arising from CT procedures to as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), European guidelines on quality criteria were published and specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were proposed for routine CT examinations [12]. The purpose of this study is to review published literature on patient radiation doses from common non-cardiac CT examinations, to compare findings with DRLs, to identify whether patient doses are reduced or increased for newer studies and to comment on the impact of multislice technology on patient doses.