The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and speech perception in children with Nurotron® cochlear implants during four years of follow-up

ObjectiveThe purpose of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between the presence or absence of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to speech stimuli and the performance of speech perception in Chinese pediatric recipients of the Nurotron^® cochlear implant (CI).We also wanted to determine how the CAEPs might be used as an indicator for predicting early speech perception and could provide objective evidence for clinical applications of CAEPs.Methods23 pediatric unilateral CI recipients participated in this study. 15 males 8 females, and their ages at implantation ranged from 13 to 68 months, with a mean age of 36 months. CAEPs and Mandarin Early Speech Perception (MESP) tests were used to evaluate the audibility and speech perception of these CI users. The tests were administered at the first, second, third, and fourth year after the CI surgery.ResultsAll the subjects demonstrated improvements in detection of speech sounds with CI. The percentages of participants who could detect all three stimuli were 26% (6/23) at first year, to 100% (23/23) at the fourth year post-implantation. The percentages of participants who passed the Category 6 of MESP were from 9% (2/23) at first year, to 91% (21/23) at the fourth year post-implantation. Significant correlations (p < 0.05) were found between CAEP scores and MESP at the first, second, third year after the CI surgery. The multiple regression equation for prediction of MESP categories from CAEP scores and hearing ages was MESP = 1.088 + (0.504 × CAEP score) + (0.964 × hearing ages) (F = 72.919, p < 0.001, R² = 0.621).ConclusionThe results of this study suggested that aided cortical assessment was a useful tool to evaluate the outcomes of cochlear implantation. Cortical outcomes had a significant positive relationship with the MESP, which predicted the early speech perception of CI recipients.     

Implantes cocleares bilaterales en la población infantil: adquisición de la binauralidad

Introduction and objectivesSeveral studies have indicated the benefit of bilateral cochlear implants in the acquisition of binaural hearing and bilateralism. In children with cochlear implants, is it possible to achieve binaurality after a second implant? When is the ideal time to implant them? The objective of this study was to analyse the binaural effect in children with bilateral implants and the differences between subjects with simultaneous and sequential implants with both short and long intervals.Patients and methodsThere were 90 patients between 1 and 2 years of age (the first surgery), implanted between 2000 and 2008. Of these, 25 were unilateral users and 65 bilateral; 17 patients had received simultaneous implants, 29 had sequential implants before 12 months after the first one (short interimplant period) and 19 after 12 months (long period). All of them were tested for silent and noisy verbal perception and a tonal threshold audiometry was performed.ResultsThe silent perception test showed that the simultaneous and short period sequential implant patients (mean: 84.67%) versus unilateral and long period sequential implants (mean: 79.66%), had a statistically-significant difference (P = 0,23). Likewise, the noisy perception test showed a difference with statistical significance (P = 0,22) comparing the simultaneous implanted and short period sequential implants (mean, 77.17%) versus unilateral implanted and long period sequential ones (mean: 69.32%).ConclusionsThe simultaneous and sequential short period implants acquired the advantages of binaural hearing.     

Cortical auditory responses according to hearing rehabilitation in unilateral hearing loss

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of rehabilitation systems (CROS: Contralateral Routing of Signal; BAHA: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid; CI: cochlear implant) on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) and auditory performance in unilateral hearing loss.Subjects and methodTwenty-one adults with unilateral hearing loss, using CROS (n = 6), BAHA (n = 6) or CI (n = 9), were included. Seven normal-hearing subjects served as controls. CAEPs were recorded for a (/ba/) speech stimulus; for patients, tests were conducted with and without their auditory rehabilitation. Amplitude and latency of the various CAEP components of the global field power (GFP) were measured, and scalp potential fields were mapped. Behavioral assessment used sentence recognition in noise, with and without spatial cues.ResultsOnly CI induced N1 peak amplitude change (P < 0.05). CI and CROS increased polarity inversion amplitude in the contralateral ear, and frontocentral negativity on the scalp potential map. CI improved understanding when speech was presented to the implanted ear and noise to the healthy ear, and vice-versa.ConclusionCochlear implantation had the greatest impact on CAEP morphology and auditory performance. A longitudinal study could analyze progression of cortical reorganization.     

Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: results in children and adolescents

IntroductionThe use of the bilateral cochlear implants can promote the symmetrical development of the central auditory pathways, thus benefiting the development of auditory abilities and improving sound localization and the ability of auditory speech perception in situations of competitive noise.ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of speech perception in children and adolescents using sequential bilateral cochlear implants, considering the association of these variables: age at surgery, time of device use and interval between surgeries.MethodsA total of 14 individuals between 10 and 16 years of age, who demonstrated surgical indication for the use of sequential bilateral cochlear implants as intervention in the auditory habilitation process, were assessed. The speech perception ability was assessed through sentence lists constructed in the Portuguese language, presented in two situations: in silence, with fixed intensity of 60 dB SPL, and in competitive noise, with a signal-to-noise ratio of +15 dB. The evaluation was performed under the following conditions: unilateral with the first activated cochlear implant, unilateral with the second activated cochlear implant and bilateral with both devices activated.ResultsThe results of the speech perception tests showed better performance in both silence and in noise for the bilateral cochlear implant condition when compared to the 1st cochlear implant and the 2nd cochlear implant alone. A worse result of speech perception was found using the 2nd cochlear implant alone. No statistically significant correlation was found between age at the surgical procedure, interval between surgeries and the time of use of the 2nd cochlear implant, and the auditory speech perception performance for all assessed conditions. The use of a hearing aid prior to the 2nd cochlear implant resulted in benefits for auditory speech perception with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise.ConclusionThe bilateral cochlear implant provided better speech perception in silence and in noise situations when compared to the unilateral cochlear implant, regardless of the interval between surgeries, age at the surgical procedure and the time of use of the 2nd cochlear implant. Speech perception with the 1st cochlear implant was significantly better than with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise. The use of the hearing aid prior to the 2nd cochlear implant influenced speech perception performance with the 2nd cochlear implant, both in silence and in noise.     

Musical Ear Syndrome: Prevalence and characteristics in cochlear implant bearers

IntroductionMusical Ear Syndrome (MES) is an uncommon phenomenon described as the perception of auditory musical sensations not corresponding to any external stimulus. It seems to be more frequent in case of profound hearing loss. Our objective was to evaluate prevalence, characteristics and risk factors in a population of cochlear implant patients.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in cochlear implant patients, who were adult (> 18 years) in 2020 and underwent cochlear implantation between 1993 and 2019. We analyzed the presence and characteristics of MES.Results118 of the 358 patients (33%) perceived or had perceived auditory musical sensations: 71 (19.8%) before, 100 (28%) after, and 53 (14.8%) both before and after implantation. The musical auditory sensations were usually short and well-tolerated, resembling instrumental music, and occurring several times a day. Thirteen patients (11%) considered them intolerable. Fatigue was a triggering factor in 40 patients (33.9%). Personal and medical characteristics, type of implantation, make of implant, etiology and tinnitus did not emerge as risk factors. On the other hand, MES+ patients were significatively younger (56 ± 17.4 years versus 61.9 ± 17.9 years; P = 0.0009). Despite the phenomenon, patients were satisfied with implant functioning and subjective auditory performance was not affected.ConclusionPrevalence of Musical Ear Syndrome was high in cochlear implant patients, and especially in younger subjects. It is essential to improve knowledge of this phenomenon.     

Prelingual auditory-perceptual skills as indicators of initial oral language development in deaf children with cochlear implants

ObjectivesTo assess when prelingually deaf children with a cochlear implant (CI) achieve the First Milestone of Oral Language, to study the progression of their prelingual auditory skills in the first year after CI and to investigate a possible correlation between such skills and the timing of initial oral language development.MethodsThe sample included 44 prelingually deaf children (23 M and 21 F) from the same tertiary care institution, who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants. Achievement of the First Milestone of Oral Language (FMOL) was defined as speech comprehension of at least 50 words and speech production of a minimum of 10 words, as established by administration of a validated Italian test for the assessment of initial language competence in infants. Prelingual auditory-perceptual skills were assessed over time by means of a test battery consisting of: the Infant Toddler Meaningful Integration Scale (IT-MAIS); the Infant Listening Progress Profile (ILiP) and the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP).ResultsOn average, the 44 children received their CI at 24 ± 9 months and experienced FMOL after 8 ± 4 months of continuous CI use. The IT-MAIS, ILiP and CAP scores increased significantly over time, the greatest improvement occurring between baseline and six months of CI use. On multivariate regression analysis, age at diagnosis and age at CI did not appear to bear correlation with FMOL timing; instead, the only variables contributing to its variance were IT-MAIS and ILiP scores after six months of CI use, accounting for 43% and 55%, respectively.ConclusionPrelingual auditory skills of implanted children assessed via a test battery six months after CI treatment, can act as indicators of the timing of initial oral language development. Accordingly, the period from CI switch-on to six months can be considered as a window of opportunity for appropriate intervention in children failing to show the expected progression of their auditory skills and who would have higher risk of delayed oral language development.     

Prevalence of potential candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation implant in a hearing-impaired population

ObjectiveTo estimate the prevalence of potential electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) implant candidates in a hearing-impaired population through a review of auditory examinations.MethodsIn total, 7356 patients underwent audiometric examination in our department between 2011 and 2014. The prevalence of patients meeting the audiometric criteria for EAS and standard cochlear implant (CI) was assessed.ResultsThe percentage of EAS implant candidates meeting the pure-tone audiometric criteria was 0.71% (n = 34) among the hearing-impaired individuals (n = 4758) examined in our department, whereas 2.52% (n = 120) met the criteria for standard CI. Among the 34 EAS implant candidates, 2 individuals (5.83%) received EAS implant surgery after approval of the EAS device in Japan.ConclusionsThere was a lower prevalence of EAS implant candidates than standard CI candidates. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals should carefully examine the audiograms of patients with high frequency hearing loss with regard to meeting the indication criteria for EAS implant. This will enable patients to gain access to adequate information relating to further examinations and treatment options.     

Auditory performance after cochlear reimplantation

AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cochlear reimplantation (CR) on hearing performance in children and adults with severe to profound hearing loss.Material and MethodsRetrospective observational study.ObjectivesThe main objective of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in hearing performance before and after CR. Secondary objectives were to analyze reasons for CR; to assess correlations between auditory performance and complete electrode reinsertion during CR, age, gender, explantation-to-CR interval, and interval between first implantation and CR; and to assess difference in APCEI score and the French evaluation protocol for implanted patients before and after CR.ResultsComparison of speech perception scores before and after explantation-reimplantation showed no significant difference (P > 0.005) at 1 year or at 2 years after CR. In 80% of cases, reimplantation was due to hard implant failure. In other cases, it was undertaken for soft failure (diminished performance but no abnormalities on integrity testing) (8%), medical reasons (6%), or undetermined reasons (6%). There was no significant correlation between auditory performance at 1 or 2 years and complete or incomplete reinsertion of electrodes, age, gender, explantation-to-CR interval, or interval between first implantation and CR (P > 0.005). For the adult subgroup, the French evaluation protocol scores did not differ after reimplantation (P = 0.62). Likewise, for the child sub-group, APCEI and CAP results did not deteriorate after reimplantation.ConclusionReimplantation had no negative impact on hearing and speech perception, but provided performance equivalent to or better than after initial implantation.     

Evaluation of the impact of hearing loss in adults: Validation of a quality of life questionnaire

ObjectivesThe impact of hearing loss and of auditory rehabilitation (hearing aid, cochlear implant) on quality of life is a crucial issue. Commonly used questionnaires to assess quality of life in these patients (Nijmegen, APHAB, GBI) are time-consuming, difficult for patients to fill out, and show poor sensitivity to small improvements or deterioration. The objective of the present study was to validate a dedicated quality of life scale for hearing-impaired adults with or without auditory rehabilitation.Material and methodsERSA (Évaluation du Retentissement de la Surdité chez l’Adulte: Evaluation of the Impact of Hearing Loss in Adults) is a self-administered questionnaire. It is divided into 4 domains, each comprising 5 questions graded from 1 to 10. The questions are simple, and formulated so patients will answer according to how they feel at the actual time of the session. Test-retest reliability was measured in 38 patients. Internal coherence and validity against the APHAB questionnaire as gold standard and in relation to hearing performance were measured in 122 patients at auditory assessment. Sensitivity to change in hearing was measured in 36 cochlear implant patients, before and 6 or 12 months after implantation.ResultsTest-retest reliability was very satisfactory (ρ = 0.88). Internal coherence was good for all questions. External validity, comparing ERSA to APHAB scores in the same non-implanted hearing-impaired patients, was good (ρ = 0.52). Additionally, ERSA scores correlated with hearing performance in adverse conditions (monosyllabic words: ρ = 0.22; sentences in noise: ρ = 0.19). In patients tested before and after cochlear implantation, improvement in hearing performance in silence and in noise correlated with an improvement in ERSA score (ρ = 0.37 to 0.59, depending on the test), but not to GBI score.ConclusionThe ERSA questionnaire is easy and quick to use, reliable, and sensitive to change in hearing performance after cochlear implantation.     

Tone and sentence perception in young Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of cochlear implantation in young children in terms of (1) perception of lexical tones in quiet, (2) perception of sentences in quiet and in noise, (3) the effects of five demographic variables (i.e., preoperative hearing level, age at implantation, duration of cochlear implants use, maternal educational level, and whether a child underwent a hearing aid trial before implantation) on lexical tone perception and sentence perception, and (4) the relationship between lexical tone perception and sentence perception.Methods96 participants, aged from 2.41 years to 7.09 years, were recruited in mainland China. The children exhibited normal cognitive abilities and received unilateral implants at an average age of 2.72 years, with ages ranging from 0.69 to 5 years of age.ResultsThe mean score for tone identification was 77% (SD = 13%; chance level = 50%). Tone 2/tone 3 was the most difficult tone contrast to identify. Children with a longer duration of CI use and whose mothers had more years of education tended to perform better in sentence perception in quiet and in noise. Having undergone a hearing aid trial before implantation and more residual hearing were additional factors contributing to better sentence perception in noise. The only demographical variable that related to tone perception in quiet was duration of CI. In addition, while there was a modest correlation between tone perception and sentence perception in quiet (r_s = 0.47, p < 0.001), the correlation between tone perception in quiet and sentence perception in noise was much weaker (r_s = −0.28, p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe findings suggested that most young children who had been implanted before 5 years of age and had 1–3 years of implant use did not catch up with their aged peers with normal hearing in tone perception and sentence perception. The weak to moderate correlation between tone perception in quiet and sentence perception might imply that the improvement of tone perception in quiet may not necessarily contribute to sentence perception, especially in noise condition.     

Is there a best side for cochlear implants in post-lingual patients?

Introduction

Cochlear Implant is a sensory prosthesis capable of restoring hearing in patients with severe or profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus® 6 system

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate whether experienced paediatric cochlear implant users could show benefits to speech perception outcomes from the introduction of noise reduction and automated scene classification technologies as implemented in the Nucleus^® 6 sound processor. Previous research with adult cochlear implant users had shown significant improvements in speech intelligibility for listening in noisy conditions and good user acceptance for upgrading to the Nucleus 6 processor. In adults, these improvements for listening in noise were primarily attributed to the use of a range of new input processing technologies including noise reduction, as well as introduction of automatic scene classification technology.MethodsExperienced paediatric cochlear implant users (n = 25) were recruited from four clinics located in three countries. Research participants were evaluated on three occasions, an initial session using their Nucleus 5 sound processor; a second session in which participants used the Nucleus 6 processor programmed with the same technologies as were used in their Nucleus 5 sound processor; and a final session in which participants used the Nucleus 6 processor programmed with the default technologies including automatic scene classification (SCAN) which automatically selects the microphone directionality, noise reduction (SNR-NR), and wind noise reduction (WNR) technologies. Prior to both the second and third evaluations, research participants had approximately two weeks take-home experience with the new system. Speech perception performances on monosyllabic word tests presented in quiet and in noise, and a sentence test presented in noise, were compared across the three processor conditions. Acceptance of the Nucleus 6 default settings was assessed in a final session.ResultsNo group mean difference in performance was found for monosyllabic words in quiet. A significant improvement in speech perception was found for both monosyllabic words and sentences in noise with the default Nucleus 6 program condition as compared with the Nucleus 5 condition. No acceptance issues were noted for any of the children.ConclusionsExperienced paediatric cochlear implant users showed a significant improvement in speech perception in listening in noise when upgraded to the Nucleus 6 sound processor primarily due to the introduction of a noise reduction technology, and all children accepted the default program. These findings suggest that school-aged children may benefit from upgrading to the Nucleus 6 sound processor using the default program.     

Binaural advantage on usage of hearing aid together with cochlear implant--examination on speech perception (Japanese monosyllable word list 67-S and Japanese HINT)]

Six cochlear implant recipients with hearing aids in the opposite ear were studied to survey binaural advantage. They were examined in separate tests by using a hearing aid alone, cochlear implant alone, and by using both devices (bimodal condition). Test items used were the Japanese monosyllable word list 67--S and Japanese HINT. Statistically significantly results were obtained in the bimodal condition, three out of six subjects were successful in the monosyllable word test and all successful in the Japanese HINT. We conclude that all subjects enjoyed binaural advantage in speech perception in bimodal condition with no conflict at the recognition level; even when different sounds from cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid were received. The plasticity of the brain is thought to be of importance in the bimodal condition.     

Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level

ObjectivesTo assess whether electrical stimulation sequentially delivered through 4 electrodes located in different cochlear areas may elicit the stapedial reflex at lower levels compared to single electrode stimulation and to correlate the sequentially obtained values with the maximum comfort level (C-level).Patients and methodsA retrospective study was performed on 35 post-verbal adult patients (age 19–80 years) consecutively implanted in 2 cochlear implant centers, evaluating the level of stimulation (pulse width) necessary to electrically evoke the stapedial reflex with two different stimulation modalities: single electrode versus sequential 4 electrode stimulation. Threshold values were compared with C-level obtained at activation.ResultsThe average differences of pulse width and C-level were significantly smaller (P < 0.0001) when the stapedial reflex was obtained with the sequential stimulation modality and reached statistical significance for every single electrode (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsStapedial reflex thresholds obtained with sequential stimulation through 4 different electrodes significantly correlate to the C-level obtained at the first setting and may be helpful in defining the upper limit of the dynamic field during initial CI mapping.     

High levels of sound pressure: acoustic reflex thresholds and auditory complaints of workers with noise exposure

IntroductionThe clinical evaluation of subjects with occupational noise exposure has been difficult due to the discrepancy between auditory complaints and auditory test results. This study aimed to evaluate the contralateral acoustic reflex thresholds of workers exposed to high levels of noise, and to compare these results to the subjects’ auditory complaints.MethodsThis clinical retrospective study evaluated 364 workers between 1998 and 2005; their contralateral acoustic reflexes were compared to auditory complaints, age, and noise exposure time by chi-squared, Fisher's, and Spearman's tests.ResultsThe workers’ age ranged from 18 to 50 years (mean = 39.6), and noise exposure time from one to 38 years (mean = 17.3). We found that 15.1% (55) of the workers had bilateral hearing loss, 38.5% (140) had bilateral tinnitus, 52.8% (192) had abnormal sensitivity to loud sounds, and 47.2% (172) had speech recognition impairment. The variables hearing loss, speech recognition impairment, tinnitus, age group, and noise exposure time did not show relationship with acoustic reflex thresholds; however, all complaints demonstrated a statistically significant relationship with Metz recruitment at 3000 and 4000 Hz bilaterally.ConclusionThere was no significance relationship between auditory complaints and acoustic reflexes.     

Immediate activation after cochlear implantation: Preliminary Study

ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of immediate activation of cochlear implants.Material and methodsA retrospective study compared speech audiometry results at 6 months post-implantation, implant fitting data and complications, on Student test, between 19 patients receiving day-1 implant activation (immediate activation: IA) and 10 patients with activation at 2 weeks (classical activation: CA).ResultsMean speech comprehension, using Fournier bisyllabic word lists at 60 dB 6 months after implantation, was 61.58% in IA and 71% in CA (P > 0.05). Mean intelligibility thresholds for 50% word-recognition were respectively 39.74 dB and 36.5 dB (P > 0.05). Speech audiometry results at 6 months were not affected by immediate versus classical activation. Comfort-level settings at 1 month in IA were not significantly different (Student test: P > 005) from intraoperative neural response thresholds: i.e., were practically stable. One IA patient required delayed activation at 1 month because of hematoma interfering between the external and internal parts of the implant. There were no other complications. The mean number of fitting sessions during the first year was 6.05 in the IA group and 6.55 in the CA group (P > 0.05).ConclusionGiven certain precautions during follow-up, immediate activation after cochlear implantation was feasible, and did not impair audiometric results.     

Speech-in-noise perception ability can be related to auditory efferent pathway function: a comparative study in reading impaired and normal reading children

IntroductionDeficient auditory processing can cause problems with speech perception and affect the development and evolution of reading skills. The efferent auditory pathway has an important role in normal auditory system functions like speech-in-noise perception, but there is still no general agreement on this.ObjectiveTo study the performance of the efferent auditory system in a group of children with reading impairment in comparison with normal reading and evaluation of its relationship with speech-in-noise perception.MethodsA total of 53 children between the ages of 8–12 years were selected for the study of which 27 were with reading impairment and 26 were normal reading children. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression and auditory recognition of words-in-noise test were performed for all the children.ResultsThe average amplitude of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression showed a significant difference between the two groups in the right (p = 0.004) and in the left ear (p = 0.028). Assessment of the relationship between transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression and monaural auditory recognition of words-in-noise scores showed a significant moderate negative relationship only in the right ear (p = 0.034, r = −0.41) of the normal reading children. Binaural auditory recognition of words-in-noise scores were significantly correlated with the amplitude of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression in the right ear (p < 0.001, r = −0.75) and in the left ear (p < 0.001, r = −0.64) of normal reading children. In the reading impaired group, ?a weaker correlation was observed between binaural auditory recognition of words-in-noise scores and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression in the right (p = 0.003, r = −0.55) and in the left ear (p = 0.012, r = −0.47).ConclusionsTransient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression pattern in the reading impaired group was different compared with normal reading children, and this difference could be related to efferent system performance. Words-in-noise scores in children with impaired reading were lower than in normal reading children. In addition, a relationship was found between transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression and words-in-noise scores in both normal and impaired reading children.     

Hearing rehabilitation with osseointegrated hearing implant in bilateral congenital external auditory canal atresia

Introduction and objectivesCongenital atresia of the external auditory canal (EAC) is a congenital defect present in one in every 10,000–20,000 births. It causes conductive hearing loss, with an air-bone gap of 50–60 dB. Early amplification is essential in bilateral cases to ensure normal language development. The aim of this study is to present the osseointegrated hearing implant as a treatment for bilateral EAC atresia, reviewing the audiometric results and the rate of complications.Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with bilateral congenital EAC atresia under follow-up in the pediatric ENT clinic of the ENT and Head and Neck Surgery department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital, between 2003 and 2019. We reviewed the medical records and collected information on the assessment of the initial audiometric status. In the cases submitted for implantation with an osseointegrated hearing implant, we analyzed the details of follow-up, including immediate and long-term post-operative complications, as well as the audiometric results.ResultsWe present 8 pediatric patients, 6 girls and 2 boys, with a diagnosis of bilateral congenital EAC atresia. The audiometric assessment revealed moderate to severe bilateral conductive hearing loss with a mean speech recognition threshold (SRT) of 51 dB. Six patients underwent osseointegrated hearing implantation. All 6 patients showed good audiometric results, with an average SRT of 20 dB and closure of the air-bone gap.ConclusionsThe osseointegrated hearing implant was an effective treatment option in these patients, without significant morbidity or complications. Osseointegrated hearing implantation should be considered first line treatment for children with bilateral congenital EAC atresia, as it presents good functional results and a high level of patient satisfaction.     

Bilateral cochlear implantation: Current concepts,indications, and results

The optimal treatment for bilateral hearing loss continues to evolve as cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid technologies advance, as does our understanding of the central auditory system. Ongoing discussions continue on the validity and feasibility of bilateral CI in terms of performance, justification of need, medical/surgical safety concerns, and economics. The purpose of this review article is to provide an update on the advantages and disadvantages of bilateral CI and to provide a discussion on timing (simultaneous vs. sequential), technology (bimodal vs. binaural) and feasibility. Binaural advantages are found in both adult and pediatric bilateral CI recipients, the greatest being the head shadow effect and improvements in localization and loudness summation. This theoretically offers an advantage over their unilateral implanted counterparts in terms of improved sound localization and enhanced speech perception under noisy conditions. Most investigators agree that bilateral stimulation during critical periods of development is paramount for optimizing auditory functioning in children. Currently, bilateral CI is widely accepted as a safe and effective means of bilateral auditory stimulation. Laryngoscope, 2009