Post-dural puncture headache in the parturient

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common and debilitating complications of neuraxial blockade in the parturient. The obstetric population is at particular risk with up to 80% of women developing symptoms after inadvertent dural puncture during epidural insertion. PDPH typically develops 24–48 hours post-puncture and is classically described as an occipito-frontal headache with postural features. Diagnosis and assessment should include consideration of other potential causes of post-partum headache. At the time of inadvertent dural puncture (IDP) one may insert an intrathecal catheter, re-site the epidural or use alternative analgesia. Initial treatment of a PDPH includes bed rest, adequate hydration and simple analgesics. Epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold standard treatment of PDPH.     

Accidental dural puncture: Combination of prophylactic methods to avoid post-dural puncture headache

Accidental dural puncture (ADP) is a common complication of epidural catheter insertion, and may lead to post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), especially in obstetric patients. Epidural blood patch (BP) is the most effective treatment of PDPH. Prophylactic BP has shown its efficacy to prevent PDPH; nevertheless, this method may be insufficient. We report an ADP case before induction of labor in a 28-year-old parturient. To avoid PDPH, an intrathecal catheter was immediately inserted after ADP and an epidural catheter was also inserted at the interspace above. Catheters were kept in place for more than 24 hours. A prophylactic BP was performed immediately after removal of the intrathecal catheter. The patient did not experience any headache. This combination of treatments (intrathecal catheter insertion + prophylactic BP) may be a good alternative approach to prevent PDPH, even if it has to be warranted by other clinical studies.     

The management of accidental dural puncture and postdural puncture headache: a North American survey

Study Objective

To evaluate the management of accidental dural puncture (ADP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) among obstetric anesthesiologists practicing in North America.

Design

Questionnaire survey of individual members of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP).

Setting

University hospital.

Measurements

In June 2008, a 4-part, 83-item electronic survey was distributed to all North American members of SOAP. It contained questions about respondent demographics, epidural catheter and intrathecal catheter management after ADP, PDPH management, epidural blood patch (EBP) management, and patient follow-up.

Main Results

Of the 843 United States and Canadian members of SOAP who were surveyed, 160 responses were collected. Respondents reported placing an epidural 75% of the time and an intrathecal catheter 25% of the time following ADP. Common prophylactic and conservative treatment strategies included hydration, caffeine, and opioids by mouth; 76% of respondents leave an intrathecal catheter in place for 24 hours to reduce the frequency of headache. Epidural blood patches are placed by 81% of practitioners less than 24 hours after headache onset.

Conclusions

Protocols for ADP management are rare. There is wide variation in catheter management after dural puncture, measures used to prevent and treat a resultant headache, and EBP management.     

Sequential higher epidural catheter re-insertion after accidental dural puncture ameliorates the frequency and severity of post-dural puncture headache

ObjectivesThis cohort study aimed to evaluate the outcome of a hypothesis to use higher level for epidural catheter insertion and activation when an epidural tap was encountered at a lower level during epidural analgesia for labor pain.MethodsEpidural analgesia for labor pain was conducted using a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and fentanyl 5 μg/ml (10–15 ml) in 5-ml increments and maintained using continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine and fentanyl 2 μg/ml at rate of (5–15 ml/h), subsequently adjusted according to the patients needs. All cases had accidental dural puncture (ADP) were managed immediately with re-insertion of the needle at a higher level and completion of the procedure and maintained using continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine and fentanyl 2 μg/ml at rate of (6–12 ml/h) for 24 h after delivery. Postpartum follow-up was conducted for 30 days to comment on the occurrence and severity of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). All patients developed PDPH were followed daily until resolution of their headache.ResultsAbout 4800 parturient were enrolled in the study, ADP occurred in 24 patients with a frequency of 0.5%. All cases were immediately managed by re-insertion of the needle at a higher level and the procedure was successfully completed without new dural puncture, with 100% re-insertion success rate, and patients were maintained on continuous epidural infusion for 24 h. Throughout 30-day follow-up; only six of 24 patients developed PDPH with a success rate of re-insertion procedure as a prophylactic modality for PDPH after ADP of 75%. PDPH was relieved with bed rest, liberal fluids and paracetamol for 4 days in four patients, while the 5th patient continued to complain but the patient refused to undergo epidural blood patch (EBP) and headache started to subside and patient stopped to complain by the 10th day, and the last patient agreed to undergo EBP; and headache was relived immediately after 2 h.ConclusionIt could be concluded that re-insertion of epidural catheter at higher level of accidental dural puncture with epidural continuous infusion for 24 h could be considered as an efficient prophylactic modality to safe guard against PDPH with success rate of 75% and minimizes its severity if occurred.     

Epidural blood patch for management of postdural puncture headache in adolescents

BACKGROUND: In some patients spinal puncture (SP) is followed by postdural puncture headache (PDPH). When the symptoms of PDPH are severe and are not relieved within a few days an epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. The aim of this survey was to review requests for EBPs and to evaluate the effectiveness of EBP in patients aged 13-18 years during a 6.5 year period ending in June 2001. METHODS: The Information System Patient Measures Database was interrogated to identify patients who were referred for EBP. After identification, the patients' medical records were reviewed in detail for the characteristics of PDPH and other symptoms, and for the effectiveness of the EBP. RESULTS: Forty-two EBPs were performed after 40 SPs on 37 patients (24 girls, 13 boys). Epidural blood patches were performed twice in five patients. The reasons for repeating the procedure were repeat SP with new PDPH in three patients and an unsatisfactory effect in two patients. Twenty-eight of the 40 spinal punctures (70%) had been performed for diagnostic use and 10 (25%) for spinal anesthesia. Two patients (5%) developed PDPH after inadvertent dural puncture with an epidural needle. In 37 cases the criteria for PDPH were fulfilled, and one patient had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache. Two-thirds of the girls had associated symptoms of headache compared with one-third of the boys. Epidural blood patch was performed 1-22 days after SP with 0.2 ml/kg (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. The success rate of the first injection was 37 out of 40 EBP (93%), and the second injection was effective in both patients with recurred PDPH. CONCLUSION: Epidural blood patch seems to be an effective and safe procedure in adolescents for treating severe and persistent PDPH.     

Management of postdural puncture headache with epidural blood patch in children

BACKGROUND: Until the last decade, it was believed that postdural puncture headache (PDPH) was an uncommon complaint in children, but recent studies indicate that young children may develop PDPH after spinal puncture. When the symptoms are severe and are not relieved within a few days with analgesics, forced hydration and bed rest, then epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. METHODS: In this retrospective survey, we analysed EBP performed in Kuopio University Hospital between the years 1995 and 2000. RESULTS: During the 6-year period, seven EBP were performed in children aged 12 years or younger. Four out of the seven children had undergone a diagnostic spinal puncture, two had spinal anaesthesia and one child had spinal puncture for treatment of postoperative hygroma. Five children had a typical PDPH, one child had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache and one child had a headache similar to his migraine. EBP was performed 2-19 days after spinal puncture with 0.3 ml.kg-1 (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. CONCLUSIONS: EBP gave some relief of symptoms in all children. No complications related to EBP were noticed.     

Obstetric post-dural puncture headache

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a recognized complication of inadvertent dural puncture (DP) during epidural insertion or the intentional dural puncture following spinal anaesthesia. The resulting headache can be debilitating.     

Accidental dural puncture during epidural blood patch: a narrative review

Whilst performing an epidural blood patch (EBP) to treat post dural-puncture headache following accidental or intentional dural puncture, the risk of a subsequent accidental dural puncture (ADP) is commonly quoted as 1%. However, a recent review reported only three documented cases. It seems likely that this complication is more common than is acknowledged, yet there is a paucity of literature and an absence of any guidance as to how to proceed in practice. This review addresses three unanswered questions regarding ADP during EBP: what is the incidence; what are the immediate clinical consequences; and what is the optimal clinical management?The incidence may reasonably be estimated to be 0.5–1%. Even on large units, this complication will not be experienced by every consultant anaesthetist during their career. It is likely to occur 20–30 times per year in the United Kingdom, and in greater numbers in those countries with higher epidural rates. Immediately re-attempting an EBP at a different level may be a reasonable management approach which has high efficacy, and is without clear evidence of significant harm. However, the limited evidence means that the risks are poorly characterised, and more data may lead to alternative conclusions.There is uncertainty amongst obstetric anaesthetists about how to manage ADP during EBP. More data and pragmatic guidance, which evolves with further evidence, will ensure optimal care for patients suffering this compound iatrogenic complication.     

Efficacy of epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache

This prospective investigation was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different volumes of epidural blood patch (EBP) for treatment of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in 81 consecutive patients. In the first part of the investigation (Study part I), 10 ml of blood was injected for EBP in 28 patients. In the second randomized part of the investigation (Study part II), the patients were allocated to receive for EBP either 10 ml (27 patients) or 10–15 ml (26 patients), according to the height of the patient. The procedure was considered initially successful if PDPH disappeared completely during the 2–h recovery room follow–up. To evaluate the long–term success, a questionnaire was mailed to all patients. The EBP performed 3.7± 2.9 days following the dural puncture was initially successful in 88–96% of the patients in the different study groups. In the questionnaire, only 50–68% of the patients reported that PDPH had disappeared immediately without recurrence. In 16–36% of the patients the PDPH returned at lesser intensity and in 14–17% PDPH was reported to have continued, disappearing gradually in all patients. Despite this, 87% of all patients were satisfied with the EBP treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. The results indicate that a larger, height–adjusted volume of blood for EBP in adults does not produce a better effect on PDPH compared to a standard 10–ml volume. Despite the excellent initial effect (91%) seen in our patients, a permanent effect of the blood patch was only achieved in 61%.     

Repetitive hearing loss following dural puncture treated with autologous epidural blood patch

A case of repetitive hearing loss following an otherwise uncomplicated diagnostic dural puncture is presented. The patient developed severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and three episodes of pronounced vestibulocochlear disturbances within five weeks after only one dural puncture. On all three occasions the headache and the associated symptoms were treated with an autologous epidural blood patch (AEBP) resulting in the immediate disappearance of all the subjective complaints of postdural puncture headache and the normalization of an audiological test within minutes.     

Management of accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache after labour: a Nordic survey

Background: A major risk with epidural analgesia is accidental dural puncture (ADP), which may result in post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH). This survey was conducted to explore the incidence of ADP, the policy for management of PDPH and the educational practices in epidural analgesia during labour in the Nordic countries. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to the anaesthesiologist responsible for Obstetric anaesthesia service in all maternity units (n=153) with questions relating to the year 2008. Results: The overall response rate was 93%. About 32% (22–47%) of parturients received epidural analgesia for labour. There were databases for registering obstetric epidural complications in 13% of Danish, 24% of Norwegian and Swedish, 43% of Finnish and 100% of hospitals in Iceland. The estimated incidence of ADP was 1% (n≈900). Epidural blood patch (EBP) was performed in 86% (n≈780) of the parturients. The most common time interval from diagnosis to performing EBP was 24–48 h. The success rate for EBP was >75% in 67% (62–79%) of hospitals. The use of diagnostic CT/MRI before the first or the second EBP was exceptional. No major complication was reported. Teaching of epidurals was commonest (86%) in the non‐obstetric population and 53% hospitals desired a formal training programme in obstetric analgesia. Conclusion: We found the incidence of ADP to be approximately 1%. EBP was the commonest method used for its management, and the success rate was high in most hospitals. Formal training in epidural analgesia was absent in most countries and trainees first performed it in the non‐obstetric population.     

Conventional treatment or epidural blood patch for the treatment of different etiologies of post dural puncture headache

Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) represents a complication of anesthesia (with an increased incidence in obstetric patients) or as the consequence of a diagnostic lumbar puncture. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the epidural blood-patch (EBP) versus the conventional medical treatment of post-anesthetic headaches also including the PDPH following a diagnostic puncture, a category of patients rarely referred to the anesthesia consultation in our hospital because it was believed that they might have equal benefit from conventional measures due to the smaller size of needles used. We studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded manner 32 obstetric and non-obstetric patients with PDPH having the onset of the symptoms 24 hours before the inclusion in the study. The patients were randomly divided in two groups: group A (16 patients) receiving conventional treatment (oral and intravenous fluid replacement, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs--NSAIDs--, caffeine) and group B (16 patients) in whom an epidural blood-patch was performed. The intensity of the headache was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0-10, before, 2 hours and 24 hours after the EBP. There were no statistical differences concerning the demographic data and the cause of PDPH between the groups (p > 0.05). The intensity of PDPH was similar before performing the EBP (p > 0.05), with a value on VAS of 8.2 +/- 1,4. in group A and 8,0 +/- 1.6 in group B. Two hours after the treatment, the intensity of headache on VAS diminished extremely significant (p < 0.0001): in group B the value was 1.0 +/- 0,18 versus 8.2 +/- 1.4 in group A. The difference recorded after 24 hours remained statistically significant (p < 0.0001): the VAS scores were 0.7 +/- 0,16 and 7.8 +/- 1.2 respectively. The epidural blood patch represents the first choice treatment of PDPH no matter the etiology, being significantly superior to the conventional treatment which did not affect pain scores. In severe PDPH there is no reason to delay the EBP more than 24 hours after the diagnosis as all except two patients of the conventional treatment group required blood patching following the study period.     

The epidural blood patch. Resolving the controversies

PURPOSE: To review the literature regarding epidural blood patch (EBP) to generate conclusions relating to the controversial issues surrounding its application. SOURCE: A Medline search was made for relevant publications using keywords epidural blood patch, prophylactic epidural blood patch, dural puncture, and postdural puncture headache. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were hand-searched for relevant articles. Case series and comparative trials were emphasized in the analyses. These were culled and those deemed relevant were reviewed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The majority of the literature consists of observational reports: there are few comparative studies. Headache most likely results from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) loss leading to intracranial content shift and traction on pain sensitive structures; cerebrovascular alterations may be implicated. An EBP with 10-15 ml blood is indicated and effective therapy for severe headache after dural puncture. There is conflicting evidence regarding larger volume blood injections or delaying EBP for 24 hr or more after the diagnosis of postdural puncture headache (PDPH). Efficacy of EBP is related to a "patch effect" as well as transmission of increased epidural space pressure to the CSF space. Previous estimates of EBP efficacy were overgenerous; persistent symptomatic relief can be expected in 61-75% of patients with initial EBP. Patching with non-blood solutions, although initially effective, is associated with a high incidence of headache recurrence. Prophylactic injection of saline or blood decreases the incidence of severe headache after dural puncture. CONCLUSION: Blood-patching is an effective treatment of PDPH but further research is required regarding its mechanisms and prophylaxis.     

Decreased incidence of headache after accidental dural puncture in caesarean delivery patients receiving continuous postoperative intrathecal analgesia

To examine the effects of prolonged (> 24 h) intrathecal catheterization with the use of postoperative analgesia on the incidence of post–dural puncture headache (PDPH), charts of 45 obstetric patients who had accidental dural puncture following attempts at epidural block were reviewed retrospectively. Three groups were identified: Group I (n = 15) patients had a dural puncture on the first attempt at epidural block, but successful epidural block on a repeated attempt; Group II (n=17) patients had a dural puncture with immediate conversion to continuous spinal anaesthesia with catheterization lasting only for the duration of caesarean delivery; Group III (n= 13) patients had an immediate conversion to spinal anaesthesia and received post–caesarean section continuous intrathecal patient–controlled analgesia consisting of fentanyl 5 (ig'ml^-1 with bupivacaine 0.25 mg·ml^-1 and epinephrine 2 μg·ml^-1 with catheterization lasting >24 h. No parturient in group III developed a PDPH. This was substantially lower ( P < 0.009) than the 33% incidence for group I and the 47% incidence for group II. The incidence of a PDPH did not differ between group I and II. Similarly, there was no difference between group I and II with regard to requests for a blood patch. Patients receiving continuous intrathecal analgesia had excellent pain relief, could easily ambulate and none complained of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, sensory loss or weakness. In conclusion, indwelling spinal catheterization > 24 h with continuous intrathecal analgesia following accidental dural puncture in parturients may for some patients be a suitable method for providing PDPH prophylaxis and postoperative analgesia.     

All patients with a postdural puncture headache should receive an epidural blood patch

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is an important complication of obstetric epidural anaesthesia and analgesia. Though often self-limiting, PDPH is unpleasant, at times incapacitating, and associated with complications, some of which are serious. Despite this, treatment options are few and of limited efficacy. The epidural blood patch (EBP) has been used for PDPH treatment for over 50 years.¹ It is probably the most efficacious of therapies, although this is unproven, and plays an important part in the management of this condition.² However, PDPH is often complex, of variable severity and duration, and merits a cautious and individualized approach to its diagnosis and treatment. An EBP may be part of that treatment but administering it to all women with PDPH is not the optimal management approach.     

Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients

Study objectiveTo demonstrate a possible alternative treatment for postdural puncture headache (PDPH).DesignPostdural puncture headache is a common complication associated with neuraxial anesthesia and unintentional dural puncture. Epidural blood patch (EBP) is the standard therapy for PDPH but has risks including pain, dural puncture, and infection. Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) has been successfully used to treat migraine, cluster headache, and trigeminal neuralgia. This is a small case series in which SPGB was used to treat PDPH in 3 obstetric patients.SettingLabor and delivery suite.PatientsThree postpartum patients with PDPH were studied. One patient was American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, and the other 2 were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 2.InterventionsTransnasal SPGB using cotton-tipped applicators and 2% viscous lidocaine was performed on all 3 patients.MeasurementsHeight, weight, and vital signs were measured on all patients. In addition, the numeric rating scale (0-10) was used to quantify the pain level while in the sitting position preprocedure, immediately postprocedure, 24 hours postprocedure, and 48 hours postprocedure.Main resultsAll 3 patients had significant pain relief following the SPGB without the need for EBP.ConclusionsWhen comparing the risks of a transnasal SPGB, which include bleeding and temporary discomfort, against those of an EBP, which are documented as dural puncture, neurologic complications, bleeding, and infection, it seems reasonable to offer the SPGB before EBP.     

Decrease in the incidence of post-dural puncture headache: maintaining CSF volume

The incidence of epidural needle-induced post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients following dural puncture with a large bore (18-gauge) needle has been reported to range 76-85%. We describe seven cases in which the performance of epidural anesthesia in parturients was complicated by an unintentional dural puncture with an 18-gauge epidural needle. In all seven cases, the unintentional dural puncture was followed by (i) injection of the CSF in the glass syringe back into the subarachnoid space through the epidural needle, (ii) insertion of a epidural catheter into the subarachnoid space (now referred to as an intrathecal catheter), (iii) injection of a small amount of preservative free saline (3-5 ml) into the subarachnoid space through the intrathecal catheter, (iv) administration of bolus and then continuous intrathecal labor analgesia through the intrathecal catheter and then (v) leaving the intrathecal catheter in-situ for a total of 12-20 h. PDPH occurred in only one of these cases (14%).     

Relief of postural post dural puncture headache by an epidural blood patch 12 months after dural puncture

A 20-year-old previously healthy male presented at the pain clinic with chronic headache of about one year duration. Clinical examination revealed no pathological manifestations. During the consultation the patient was drinking Coca-Cola. On direct questioning he told that drinking Coca-Cola gave partial relief from the headache, and that the headache started after he had received two spinal anaesthetics for treatment of a lower leg fracture. Postural post dural puncture headache was now suspected and an epidural blood patch performed. Despite an interval of nearly 12 months since the dural punctures, a single epidural blood patch completely relieved the headache. This case history demonstrates that an epidural blood patch should be tried if a chronic post dural puncture headache is suspected.     

Is epidural dexamethasone effective in preventing postdural puncture headache?

BackgroundPostdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the common complications of spinal anesthesia; it is observed in 1–40% of cases involving spinal anesthesia. It can cause considerable morbidity and 40% of cases may require invasive treatments such as epidural blood patch. With the exception of invasive treatments such as an epidural blood patch, current standard treatment modalities have not proved efficacious. There had been some research done that indicated successful prophylaxis and/or treatment of PDPH by administration of intravenous steroids. Based on those findings, we hypothesize that a direct injection of corticosteroids to the anesthesia puncture site could increase the amount of corticosteroid that accumulates in the puncture site, and will be more effective in decreasing dural inflammation and incidence of PDPH than that of parenteral steroids. We formulated our study to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone directly injected into spinal anesthesia puncture sites.MethodsA total of 268 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups; one group received a prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone (2 mL, 8 mg) and the other group received 2 mL of normal saline. The incidence and intensity of PDPH and puncture site backache were each measured at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after spinal anesthesia. The intensity of the headache was graded according to the meningeal headache index.ResultsThe overall incidence of headache during the 7-day period was 5 patients (3.7%) in the control group and 11 patients (8.2%) in the study group, which is not statistically significant (X² = 2.393 and p = 0.122. The severity of headache also shows no statistical significance (2.2% in cases versus 6% in controls; z = 1.53, p = 0.126). The intensity of headache reported at the 24 hours (z = 0.698; p = 0.485), 72 hours (z = 0.849; p = 0.396), and 7 days (z = 0.008; p = 0.994) was not different. There also was no difference in the incidence of backache in the two groups.ConclusionIn contrast to other studies that showed the efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention and treatment of PDPH, our study did not show any significant effect of prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone in prevention of PDPH. However regarding the low number of PDPH in routine cases, evaluation of this intervention in groups with a high incidence of PDPH by using of particulate steroids is recommended to confirm these preliminary findings.