Effect of Hospitalization During First Chemotherapy and Performance Status on Small-cell Lung Cancer Outcomes

IntroductionSmall-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly responsive to chemotherapy (CT) and one of the few malignancies treated in hospitalized patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS). Because of the little current information available on the outcomes experienced by hospitalized patients with SCLC receiving CT, we explored the outcomes for these patients to improve the evidence base for practice.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patients with a diagnosis of SCLC and treated with CT during a 10-year period. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to site of first CT (inpatient vs. outpatient) and PS. Multivariable analysis was completed to assess for independent survival predictors.ResultsA total of 530 patients with SCLC were treated, with 82 (15%) receiving their first CT in hospital. Inpatients had a greater burden of disease and poorer PS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nephrotoxicity, and fatigue were all experienced less often by the inpatient cohort (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, and P = .007, respectively). For inpatients and outpatients, the OS rate at 12, 24, and 60 months was 22%, 9%, and 7% and 43%, 20%, and 9%, respectively (P < .001 for all). The median PFS and OS were longer for outpatients and highly functional patients. On multivariable analysis, ECOG PS was an independent predictor of the outcome and the site of first CT was not (P = .04 and P = .49, respectively).ConclusionPatients with SCLC initially treated as inpatients and those with poor functional status had shorter PFS and OS; however, some experienced long-term survival, including 5-year survival of 7% for the inpatient cohort and 5% for the ECOG PS 3-4 cohort. CT toxicities were less common in the inpatient cohort, validating that administration of CT in hospital should be considered for these patients because they could experience a meaningful long-term response to therapy.     

Determinants of Survival in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Targeted Therapies

BackgroundMolecular profiling of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples has a profound impact on choice of therapy. However, it is less clear whether EGFR and KRAS mutations are prognostic outside of a trial-based treatment paradigm.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 513 patients with NSCLC undergoing EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between May 2008 and November 2011. Survival analysis was based on the 376 patients who received systemic treatment, and their survival was determined from the date of initiation of systemic therapy.ResultsThe median overall survival (OS) was 30.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.7-36.9). Neither EGFR mutational status (P = .09) nor KRAS mutational status (0.69) was associated with OS. Female sex (P < .001), never smoker status (P = .01), better performance status (PS) (P < .001), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < .001), and lower age-weighted index (P < .001) were associated with prolonged survival. The presence of bone metastases (P = .001) and liver metastases (P = .004) was also associated with a shortened survival. In a multivariable regression that adjusted for stage, we demonstrated that male gender (P = .002), worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS (P = .01), metastases to bone (P = .03), and higher age-weighted comorbidity index (P = .001) were independent prognostic factors for shorter survival. EGFR mutation status was not prognostic (P = .85).ConclusionIn our series, EGFR and KRAS do not function as prognostic determinants for NSCLC.     

Prognostic value of baseline functional status measures and geriatric screening in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy – The randomized NORDIC9-study

IntroductionAppropriate patient selection based on functional status is crucial when considering older adults for palliative chemotherapy. This pre-planned analysis of the randomized NORDIC9-study explored the prognostic value of four functional status measures regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy.Materials and methodsPatients ≥70 years of age with mCRC not candidates for standard full-dose combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive full-dose S1 or reduced-dose S1 + oxaliplatin. At baseline, functional status was assessed using ECOG performance status (ECOG PS), frailty phenotype, Geriatric 8 (G8), and Vulnerable Elderly Survey-13 (VES-13). Multivariable regression models were applied and C-statistics were estimated.ResultsIn total, 160 patients with a median age of 78 years (IQR: 76–81) were included. While in univariate analyses, ECOG PS, frailty phenotype, and VES-13 were statistically significantly associated with differences in OS between subgroups, G8 was not (HR = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.99–2.41, p = 0.050). In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and treatment allocation, we found significant differences between subgroups for all applied tools and with C-statistics in the moderate range for ECOG PS and VES-13.Concerning PFS, statistically significant differences were observed between subgroups of ECOG PS, G8, and VES-13 both in uni- and multivariable analyses, but not for frailty phenotype.DiscussionIn this Nordic cohort of vulnerable older patients with mCRC, baseline ECOG PS, frailty phenotype, G8, and VES-13 showed prognostic value regarding overall survival, and moderate predictive value of models based on ECOG PS and VES-13 was demonstrated.     

Preoperative Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor for Adverse Oncologic Survival Outcomes for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis from the International Marker Consortium Renal Cancer (INMARC)

BackgroundWe sought to analyze the usefulness of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of survival and oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsRetrospective international analysis of patients with RCC with pretreatment CRP values from 2006 to 2017. A CRP of more than >5 mg/L was deemed elevated. The cohort was subdivided into 2 groups for analysis (normal CRP ≤5 mg/L; elevated CRP >5). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier analyses (KMA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to delineate survival outcomes and their predictors.ResultsWe analyzed 2445 patients (1641 male/804 female; normal CRP 1056/elevated CRP 1389; mean follow-up 36 months). Patients with elevated CRP had a higher incidence of hypertension (P = .001), higher body mass index (P < .001), and larger tumor size (6.0 cm vs 3.9 cm; P < .001). MVA for RFS demonstrated elevated CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .005), tumor size (HR, 1.1; P < .001), and high tumor grade (HR, 3.1; P < .001) to be independent risk factors. For normal vs elevated CRP, KMA for RFS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year RFS of 93% vs 88% (P = .001), 95% vs 83% (P = .163), 84% vs 62% (P = .001), and 58% vs 60% (P = .513), respectively. KMA MA KMA for OS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year OS of 98% vs 81% (P = .001), 94% vs 80% (P = .103), 94% vs 65% (P = .001), and 99% vs 38% (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionsPretreatment CRP was an independent predictor of RFS and OS in an international multicenter cohort of patients with RCC.     

Radiotherapy for Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma in the Elderly (Age ≥ 70 years)

BackgroundElderly patients are underrepresented in trials that establish definitive chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care for inoperable stage III non–small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). This study analyzed radiotherapy treatment delivery and outcomes at our institution according to elderly (≥ 70 years old) or younger (< 70 years) age.MethodsRecords of patients who received radiotherapy for stage III NSCLC between January 1998 and February 2010 were reviewed. Factors analyzed included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), weight loss, radiation therapy intent, and chemotherapy administered.ResultsA total of 189 patients with stage III NSCLC were analyzed (age range, 28-92 years). Elderly patients (n = 86) were more likely to have ECOG PS ≥ 2 (P < .05) and receive palliative treatment (P < .05). Elderly patients less often received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (P < .05) as well as cisplatin (P < .05). Median survival was 10.3 months for elderly patients compared with 17.2 months for younger patients (P < .05 ). In addition, elderly patients with ECOG PS (P < .05) as well as those who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (P < .05) had inferior outcomes compared with otherwise similar younger patients. However, on multivariate analysis, elderly age was not associated (P = .428) with increased risk of death, whereas poor ECOG PS (≥ 2) was significant (P < .05). In elderly patients, definitive treatment (P < .05), chemotherapy administration (P < .05), and ECOG PS of 0-1 (P < .05) were associated with improved outcome.ConclusionsAlthough elderly patients with stage III NSCLC experience inferior outcomes than younger patients with comparable disease, they are also more likely to receive suboptimal therapy. On multivariate analysis, advanced age was not associated with worse survival, which indicates that appropriately selected elderly patients should receive definitive chemoradiotherapy.     

The Predictive and Prognostic Value of Precystectomy Serum Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Levels in Patients With Invasive Bladder Cancer

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to elucidate the predictive and prognostic value of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) in patients with invasive bladder cancer (BC).Patients and MethodsPreoperative serum GGT concentrations were assessed in 324 patients treated with RC for cM0 BC between 2002 and 2013. Laboratory values were obtained 1 to 3 days prior to RC. Uni- and multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate clinicopathologic risk factors for survival. The median follow-up was 36 months (IQR: 10-55).ResultsElevated preoperative GGT levels were diagnosed in 77 patients (23.8%). Elevated GGT was significantly associated with higher ECOG PS and tumor stage (both P = .001), lymph-node tumor involvement (P < .001), positive surgical margins (P = .018), lymphovascular invasion (P = .024), muscle-invasive disease at primary diagnosis (P = .033), increased tumor size (P = .035), hydronephrosis at RC (P = .049) and increased preoperative CRP, GPT and GOT levels (both P < .001). Patients with elevated GGT had decreased 3-year overall (49.2% vs. 69.6%; P = .005) and cancer-specific survival (71.1% vs. 80.9%; P = .042) compared with patients with normal levels. On multivariable analysis, advanced tumor stage (P = .032), lymph node positive disease (P = .030), positive soft tissue surgical margins (P = .014), hydronephrosis at RC (both P = .010), higher ECOG performance status and elevated GGT (P = .043) levels were independent predictors of all-cause mortality.ConclusionElevated preoperative serum GGT levels are associated with increased risk of locally advanced BC and mortality after RC. These data suggest that GGT levels may be useful for improved prognostication in invasive BC.     

PTEN Loss as a Predictor of Tumor Heterogeneity and Poor Prognosis in Patients With EGFR-mutant Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BackgroundRapid disease progression of patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been recently associated with tumor heterogeneity, which may be mirrored by coexisting concomitant alterations. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the correlation between loss of function of PTEN and the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this population.Materials and MethodsArchival tumor blocks from patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were administered upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitors were retrospectively collected. The status of 4 genes (PTEN, TP53, c-MET, IGFR) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and it was correlated with overall response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsFifty-one patients were included. In multivariate analysis, PTEN loss (hazard ratio [HR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-7.66; P = .002), IGFR overexpression (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.03-4.77; P = .04), liver metastases (HR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.46-8.65; P = .005), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 1 (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.04-6.34; P = .04) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. Patients with PTEN loss had a median PFS of 6 months (2-year PFS, 11.6%), whereas patients without PTEN loss had a median PFS of 18 months (2-year PFS, 43.6%) (log-rank P < .005). In the multivariate analysis, PTEN loss (HR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.37-14.81; P < .005), liver metastases (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.06-6.51; P = .037), and ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.15-6.81; P = .024) were significantly associated with shorter OS. Patients with PTEN loss had a median OS of 6 months (2-year OS, 12.2%), whereas in patients without PTEN loss, OS was not reached (2-year OS, 63.9%) (log-rank P < .0005).ConclusionsA low-cost and reproducible immunohistochemistry assay for PTEN loss analysis represents a potential tool for identifying tumor heterogeneity in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.     

Insurance Status is an Independent Predictor of Overall Survival in Patients With Stage III Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Treated With Curative Intent

IntroductionPopulation studies suggest an impact of insurance status on oncologic outcomes. We sought to explore this in a large single-institution cohort of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 342 consecutive patients (January 2000 to December 2013) curatively treated for stage III NSCLC. Patients were categorized by insurance status as uninsured (U), Medicare/Medicaid + Veterans Affairs (M/M + VA), or Private (P). The χ² test was utilized to compare categorical variables. The Kaplan-Meier approach and the Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and freedom from recurrence (FFR).ResultsCompared with M/M + VA patients, P insurance patients were more likely to be younger (P < .001), married (P < .001), Caucasian (P = .001), reside in higher median income zip codes (P < .001), have higher performance status (P < .001), and undergo consolidation chemotherapy (P < .001) and trimodality therapy (P < .001). Diagnosis to treatment was delayed > 30 days in U (67.3%), M/M + VA (68.1%), and P (52.6%) patients (P = .017). Compared with the M/M + VA and U cohorts, P insurance patients had improved OS (median/5-year: 30.7 months/34.2%, 19 months/17%, and 16.9 months/3.8%; P < .001) and FFR (median/5-year: 18.4 months/27.3%, 15.2 months/23.2%, and 11.4 months/4.8%; P = .012), respectively. On multivariate analysis, insurance status was an independent predictor for OS (P = .017) but not FFR.ConclusionCompared with U or M/M + VA patients, P insurance patients with stage III NSCLC were more likely to be optimally diagnosed and treated, resulting in a doubling of median OS for P versus U patients. Improved access to affordable health insurance is critical to combat inequities in access to care and has potential for improvements in cancer outcomes.     

Clinical Trial Design in Small Cell Lung Cancer: Surrogate End Points and Statistical Evolution

BackgroundSmall-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a disease for which few recent therapeutic advances have been achieved. SCLC trial design and reporting may have an impact on the interpretation of studies. Furthermore, the use of surrogate end points in SCLC has not been explored.Material and MethodsThrough examining SCLC trials published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) (8471 patients from 66 trials between 1983 and 2010), we examined how SCLC trial reporting and design has evolved, determining if the type I error, power, and sample size calculations were provided. We assessed primary end points for all trials and sought to discover surrogate end points for overall survival (OS).ResultsThere was increased reporting of statistical design in power (16.7% in 1986-1996 to 77.8% in 2006-2010; P = .001) and type I error (22.2% in 1986-1996 to 72.2% in 2006-2010; P = .005). Of trials published in 1986 to 1996, 72.2% failed to report a primary end point, whereas only 5.56% of trials conducted in 2006 to 2010 failed to do so (P = .004). Of phase II trials, primary end points were identified as response rate (RR) in 65%, OS in 25%, and progression-free survival (PFS) in 10%.ConclusionThere is a strong correlation between RR and both PFS (P = .013) and OS (P = .012) in extensive disease (ED). RR (P = .029) exhibits a negative trend over time, with a dramatic and significant decrease in RR across all studies starting in 2005. A strong correlation exists between PFS and OS for limited disease (LD) (P = .036) and ED (P = .058). We found no change in OS (P = .383) over time.     

Validation of standard definition of sensitive versus refractory relapsed small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of topotecan second-line trials

BackgroundRelapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is classified into sensitive or resistant according to treatment-free interval (TFI) longer or shorter than 60 (criteria 1) or 90 (criteria 2) days. However, these criteria are based on small old studies and are inconsistent among different studies. The present study aimed at validating these criteria and assessing additional clinical parameters predictive of response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS).Patients and methodsA database of six GlaxoSmithKline-sponsored trials of intravenous topotecan-based second-line chemotherapy was analysed. Validation of sensitive/resistant definition was performed on the entire dataset (631 patients), while study of additional parameters and development of prognostic model was conducted dividing the database into derivation and validation sets.ResultsThe association between criterion 1 or 2 and RR was confirmed. Changing TFI cut-off or adding response to first-line did not improve accuracy. In addition to TFI (P = 0.007), only presence of liver metastasis (P = 0.046) was found to affect the probability of objective response. TFI, age, liver metastases, performance status (PS), albumin, haemoglobin and sodium levels were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. A prognostic model, based on these variables, was able to separate relapsed SCLC into low versus high risk categories (median OS 41.4 versus 20.0 weeks).ConclusionsThis study confirms the value of standard criteria for relapsed SCLC outcome prediction. Patients with TFI < 60 days are refractory to second-line chemotherapy and have poor OS. Patients with liver metastasis and/or PS2 and/or low albumin, regardless of TFI, have similarly poor outcome.     

Real-World Effectiveness of Nivolumab Monotherapy After Prior Systemic Therapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States

BackgroundIn phase 3 clinical trials, nivolumab prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective real-world study evaluated OS in patients receiving nivolumab for previously treated advanced NSCLC primarily in US community hospitals.Patients and MethodsPatient data were taken from electronic health records in the Flatiron Health oncology database. OS was evaluated in patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy for nonsquamous or squamous advanced NSCLC after prior chemotherapy; subgroup analyses were performed by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), age, and other baseline characteristics. Cox analysis was used to determine OS predictors.ResultsOf 3019 included patients, 1968 (65%) had nonsquamous and 1051 (35%) had squamous histology. In both cohorts, approximately 20% of patients had a verified ECOG PS ≥ 2, and > 25% were aged ≥ 75 years. For all patients, median OS in the nonsquamous and squamous cohorts was 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-9.3) and 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.8-8.5), respectively; for those with ECOG PS 0-1, median OS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-11.8) and 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.6-9.7), respectively. In both cohorts, programmed death ligand 1 expression ≥ 1% and ECOG PS 0-1 were associated with longer OS (P < .05); the number of prior lines of therapy and age ≥ 75 years had no significant association with OS.ConclusionsThis study confirmed the effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced NSCLC in real-world clinical practice. Poor ECOG PS, but not advanced age, was associated with shorter OS.     

Prognostic Impact of Loss of SETD2 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic impact of immunohistochemical expression of SETD2 in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).Patients and MethodsA total of 662 patients with primary or metastatic ccRCC were evaluated. Two genitourinary pathologist reviewed all of the cases for uniform reclassification and determined the selection of the most representative tumor areas for construction of the tissue microarray (TMA).ResultsSETD2 nuclear staining showed that 101 areas (15.3%) had negative expression, and 561 areas (84,7%) had positive expression of SETD2. The protein expression of SETD2 was associated with clinical stage (P < .001), pathological stage (P < .001), tumor size (P < .001), perinephric fat invasion (P < .001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P = .004), surgery type (P < .001), International Society of Urologic Pathologists grade (P < .001), and tumor necrosis (P < .001). SETD2 influenced disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). DSS rates in patients with positive and negative expression of SETD2 were 90.2% and 58.4%, respectively (P < .001). OS rates in patients with positive and negative expression of SETD2 were 87% and 55.4%, respectively (P < .001). In a multivariate Cox analysis, low SETD2 expression was an independent predictor of DSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.690; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0582.700; P = .031) and OS (HR, 1.641; 95% CI, 1.039-2.593; P = .037).ConclusionOur study showed that the negative expression of SETD2 was associated with a worse prognosis, and it was an independent predictor of survival in patients with ccRCC. We believe that the protein expression of SETD2 is an important biomarker in the management of patients with ccRCC.     

Incorporation of the SUVmax Measured From FDG PET and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Improves Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the value of incorporation 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for improving prediction of clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (LA NSCLC).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 138 patients with unresectable LA NSCLC at our institution from July 2010 to August 2017. Spearman correlation analyses were used to estimate the correlations between SUVmax and NLR level. The univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic indicators, including the incorporation of SUVmax and NLR. We defined the SUVmax and NLR grade (SNG = 0, 1, or 2) score as the number of risk factors among (1) SUVmax > 11.95 and (2) NLR > 3.82. The SNG score prognostic value was evaluated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that tumor stage, SUVmax, SUVmean, NLR, and SNG score were significantly associated with OS and PFS in patients with LA NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated significant differences in both OS and PFS among patients in SNG score (OS, P < .001; PFS, P < .001). Spearman correlation analyses showed that SUVmax had a correlation with the NLR (r = 0.237; P = .005). In subgroup analyses for patients with tumor pathologic stage IIIA/IIIB, we found that the SNG score was significantly associated with OS and PFS in each subgroup (P < .001, P < .001 for OS and P = .027, P < .001 for PFS, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the SNG score was a significantly independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.612; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-2.246; P = .005) and PFS (hazard ratio, 2.241; 95% confidence interval, 1.486-3.379; P < .001).ConclusionIncorporation of the SUVmax and NLR improves prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with LA NSCLC.     

Phase I Trial of Cisplatin,Pemetrexed, and Imatinib Mesylate in Chemonaive Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

BackgroundWe conducted a phase I trial of cisplatin/pemetrexed/imatinib mesylate, an oral platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitor, in chemonaive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).MethodsA standard 3 + 3 dose-escalating trial was used with the end points of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), response rate, survival, safety/toxicity, and tumor PDGFR levels.ResultsSeventeen patients with MPM were enrolled. The most common (any grade) side effects were nausea, fatigue, hypomagnesemia, and anemia. The MTD was established at dose level 3 (imatinib 600 mg) with a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of nausea and vomiting. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months. Patients with a sarcomatoid subtype had worse PFS (P = .01) and OS (P = .009), whereas they had a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-1 predicted for improved OS (P = .001) and PFS (P = .013). The 6 patients who completed all 6 treatment cycles had better OS (P = .006); the median PFS was 9.6 months and the OS was 22.4 months. In the translational studies, 14 patients had adequate tumor tissue that could be assessed for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Patients with higher than median p-PDGFRα IHC expression had a better OS (P = .013). When assessed as a continuous variable, higher p-PDGFRα in tumor cells correlated with an improved OS (P = .045). None of the other 4 IHC biomarkers were predictive or prognostic for survival. Twelve patients had successful PDGFRB FISH results, but none met the criteria of ≥ 4 copies of the PDGFRB gene; thus a correlation with clinical outcomes could not be done.ConclusionThe cisplatin/pemetrexed/imatinib mesylate combination had clinical benefit in some patients with MPM but was not well tolerated. Further investigation into alternative antiangiogenic agents, including PDGFRα inhibitors, is warranted.     

Toxicity and survival outcomes in older adults receiving concurrent or sequential chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer in Alliance trials (Alliance A151812)

IntroductionOptimal treatment for older adults with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Here we hypothesized that sequential chemoradiation therapy (sCRT) is better tolerated than concurrent (cCRT) but confers acceptable efficacy. We evaluated these strategies in older adults utilizing Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology data.Materials and methodsPooled analyses from 6 first-line stage III NSCLC CRT trials (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8433, 8831, 9130, 30106, 30407, 39801) were used to compare toxicity and survival outcomes with cCRT versus sCRT in patients age ≥ 65 years. Grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs), progression-free and overall survival (PFS; OS) are reported with adjustment for covariates.ResultsFour hundred older adults, of whom 106 (26.5%) had received sCRT and 294 (73.5%) had received cCRT, comprised the cohorts. Virtually all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1 (99%). More grade 3–5 AEs were observed at any time-point with cCRT than sCRT (94.2% versus 86.8%; 95% confidence interval for difference in proportions, 1.3%, 15.5%) and this finding remained after adjusting for length of study treatment (P = 0.018). Comparable PFS and OS were observed with sCRT versus cCRT (median: 8.0 versus 9.2 months; median: 11.9 versus 13.4 months, respectively) even after adjustment for age, sex, ECOG PS, body mass index, pretreatment weight loss, stage, and cisplatin-based therapy (P = 0.604 and P = 0.906, respectively).DiscussionThese data show that sCRT was associated with less toxicity than cCRT with no associated statistically significant decrease in efficacy outcomes and that sCRT merits further study in this population.     

dNLR-Based Score Predicting Overall Survival Benefit for The Addition of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy to Pembrolizumab in Advanced NSCLC With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥50%

Introduction: Both pembrolizumab (P) as a monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (PCT) represent standard first-line treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS)≥50%. No predictive biomarkers exist to guide treatment decisions.Methods: 423 consecutive patients with EGFR/ALK/ROS1-wild-type PD-L1 TPS≥50% aNSCLC receiving P (n = 302) or PCT (n = 121) as a first-line treatment were identified in the electronic databases of 5 Israeli cancer centers. Overall survival (OS, months [mo]) was assessed in correlation with blood biomarkers (BB: NLR, dNLR, PLR, SII, LIPI, ALI); a predictive score was developed.Results: In the propensity score matching analysis (n = 236; 118 patients in each group matched for age, sex and ECOG PS), mOS was 17.2mo (95% CI, 13.2-36.5) and 21.3mo (95% CI, 14.8-NR) in groups P and PCT, respectively (P = .44). In group P, NLR, dNLR, PLR, LIPI, and ALI significantly correlated with OS in uni- and multivariate COX regression analyses (P < .05), whereas in group PCT, none of the BB demonstrated a significant correlation. A predictive score was developed (each parameter receiving one point): age≥65, female sex, never-smoking status, adenocarcinoma histology, dNLR≥3. In patients with predictive score 3-5, OS was significantly longer with PCT as compared to P: mOS NR (95% CI, 15.3-NR) and 8.7mo (95% CI, 5.8-13.7) (P = .0005), while OS didn't differ significantly in patients with predictive score 0-2 (P = .61).Conclusion: With the limitations of the retrospective analysis, the proposed dNLR-based score appears to predict OS with P and PCT.     

Minimal Residual Disease and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundPatients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve undetectable minimal residual disease (U-MRD) (ie, < 10^-4 detectable leukemic cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow) have better outcomes than those with detectable MRD. To assess the magnitude of improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in patients who achieved U-MRD after upfront chemotherapy (CT) or chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.Materials and MethodsThe screening process adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines. The search strategy yielded 365 records, including 22 articles assessed for eligibility.ResultsEleven studies comprising 2457 patients with CLL treated in upfront with CT or CIT were considered suitable for inclusion in the quantitative meta-analysis. Nine studies (n = 2088) provided data on the impact of MRD on PFS and 6 (n = 1234) on OS. MRD was the main endpoint in only 2 of these studies (n = 213). Tests of heterogeneity revealed significant differences among studies for PFS and OS, which highlights differences across studies. U-MRD status was associated with significantly better PFS overall (P < .001) and in patients who achieved conventional complete remission (P = .01). Regarding OS, U-MRD predicted longer OS globally (P < .001) but not in patients having achieved complete remission (P = .82).ConclusionsU-MRD status after treatment with CT or CIT in newly diagnosed CLL is associated with long-term survival. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support the integration of MRD assessment as an end point in clinical trials of CLL.     

A new prognostic model using absolute lymphocyte count in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

PurposePrimary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive and rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) has been suggested to have a prognostic value in several subtypes of NHL. We evaluated the prognostic significance of clinical factors, including ALC, in patients with PCNSL to develop a new prognostic model.MethodsWe analysed prognostic factors, including ALC, at diagnosis in 81 PCNSL patients receiving high-dose methotrexate-based therapy.ResultsThe median ALC at diagnosis was 1210 × 10⁶/L (range, 210–3610), with lymphopenia (≤875 × 10⁶/L) being detected in 27 (33.3%) patients. In the multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) >1 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.18, P = 0.003), age >50 years (HR 4.23, P = 0.012), and lymphopenia at diagnosis (HR 2.83, P = 0.008) remained independent prognostic factors for low overall survival (OS). Lymphopenia was also a significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival (HR 3.17, P = 0.001). By means of a new three-factor prognostic model using ECOG PS >1, age >50 years, and presence of lymphopenia, with 1 point assigned to each factor, we successfully classified the patients into three risk groups: low (0 and 1), intermediate (2), and high (3). The 5-year OS rates of the patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 74.3%, 21.7%, and 12.5%, respectively (P < 0.001).ConclusionsLow ALC is a useful indicator of poor prognosis in patients with PCNSL. The proposed three-factor model should be validated in large-scale studies.     

Timing of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Current Therapies

BackgroundAutologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) during the initial treatment of multiple myeloma has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS). While awaiting further prospective data, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients at our program.Patients and MethodsWe included consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had undergone stem cell harvest (SCH) from 2005 to 2014 and separated them into early (SCT within 12 months of diagnosis) and delayed (all others, including SCT not yet) groups. The outcomes were OS, PFS to first relapse, and PFS to second relapse.ResultsOf the 514 patients who had undergone SCH, 227 were in the early and 287 in the delayed groups. Patients in the delayed group who had undergone SCT had received more therapy before SCT (55% had received ≥ 2 lines vs. 6% in the early group; P < .001), had had more progressive disease at SCT (34% vs. 4%; P < .001), had received melphalan doses < 200 mg/m² (22% vs. 10%; P = .001), and had had lower rates of very good partial response or better after SCT (58% vs. 79%; P = .001). On multivariable analysis, no differences were found in median OS (90 vs. 84 months; P = .093), PFS to first relapse (40 vs. 37 months; P = .552), or PFS to second relapse (54 vs. 52 months; P = .488) between the early and delayed groups.ConclusionDelaying SCT did not affect OS or even PFS to second relapse in our cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had received current era induction therapy.     

Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: We demonstrated that circulating tumor cell (CTC) number at baseline and follow-up is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis was undertaken to explore whether patient and treatment characteristics impact the prognostic value of CTCs.Patients and methods: CTCs were enumerated with immunomagnetic separation from the blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and on therapy. Patients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of ≥3 or <3 CTCs/7.5 ml, respectively. Subgroups were analyzed by line of treatment, liver involvement, receipt of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or bevacizumab, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).Results: Seventy-one percent of deaths have occurred. Median follow-up for living patients is 25.8 months. For all patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs is shorter (4.4 versus 7.8 m, P = 0.004 for PFS; 9.4 versus 20.6 m, P < 0.0001 for OS). In all patient subgroups, unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior OS (P < 0.001). In patients receiving first- or second-line therapy (P = 0.003), irinotecan (P = 0.0001), having liver involvement (P = 0.002), ≥65 years (P = 0.0007), and ECOG PS of zero (P = 0.04), unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior PFS.Conclusion: Baseline CTC count is an important prognostic factor within specific subgroups defined by treatment or patient characteristics.