Optimizing Interdisciplinary Care of Pediatric Sexual Assault and Abuse in the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Approach

The Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago identified issues with team communication, consistency of services provided, and continuity of care within the sexual abuse and assault program in the emergency department (ED) which necessitated improvement efforts. The aim of this project was to engage an interdisciplinary team to define and delineate roles and streamline clinical workflows from ED presentation to nonacute follow-up. An interdisciplinary team was convened and utilized quality improvement methodology to complete a current state analysis, develop a future state design, and prioritize interventions for improvement. The project team focused on four interventions: (1) establish a team approach with delineated roles and responsibilities; (2) develop and implement consistent workflows to reduce unwarranted variation in care; (3) expand education on the sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program more broadly to the care teams in the ED; and (4) implement clinical decision support (CDS) tools to streamline the continuum of sexual assault services provided. Three of the interventions (all but education) were carried out as a comprehensive care guideline for patients presenting to the ED for evaluation. The ED implemented this care guideline in August 2019. The utilization of quality improvement methodology was effective in ensuring an organized, interdisciplinary team response for the evaluation of pediatric and adolescent sexual abuse and assault in the ED. It enabled strong buy-in from team members and ownership of the process with anticipated improvements in patient care and experiences.     

The Use of Experts to Evaluate a Child Abuse Guideline in Community Emergency Departments

ObjectiveGuidelines and pathways exist to help frontline providers evaluate injured children for suspected child abuse. Little, however, is known about whether the decision-making resulting from these interventions is correct. Therefore, in the absence of an available gold-standard test, we used experts’ judgments to examine the appropriateness of these clinical decisions. We evaluated community emergency department (ED) providers’ adherence to a guideline recommending a child protection team (CPT) consultation for infants with injuries associated with abuse. We then compared providers’ decision-making to experts’ recommendations before and after guideline implementation.MethodsTwo experts conducted a blinded, retrospective review of injured infants from 3 community EDs (N = 175). Experts rated the likelihood that an injury was abusive, indeterminate, or accidental, and made recommendations that were compared with skeletal survey (SS) testing and child protective services (CPS) reporting by providers before and after guideline implementation.ResultsPostguideline implementation, there was a significant increase in CPT consultations in indeterminate cases (14.3% vs 72.2%, P < .001) and in SS testing when experts recommended SS (20.6% vs 56.8%, P = .002). In contrast, a higher percentage of cases for whom the experts did not recommend reporting were reported to CPS (1.8% vs 14.6%, P = .02).ConclusionsProviders consulted the CPT most often for indeterminate cases. SS testing was in line with expert recommendations, but CPS reporting diverged from expert recommendations. Interventions linking community ED providers with a CPT may improve the evaluation of infants with injuries concerning for abuse.     

We Have All Been Working in Our Own Little Silos Forever: Exploring a Cross-Sector Response to Child Maltreatment

ObjectiveA child protective services (CPS) investigation for maltreatment signals risk for childhood toxic stress and poor health outcomes. Despite this, communication between child welfare and health care professionals is rare. We present a qualitative exploration of experiences with, barriers to, and hopes for cross-sector collaboration for children with suspected maltreatment.MethodsWe conducted focus groups with child welfare and health care professionals participating in a cross-sector learning collaborative to improve care for children at high risk for toxic stress. Participants were asked to describe 2 phenomena: identifying and responding to childhood adversities in their professional settings and cross-sector collaboration in cases of suspected maltreatment. Analysis included an iterative process of reading, coding and comparing themes across groups.ResultsHealth care professionals shared positive experiences in screening for social risks in clinic, while child welfare professionals expressed mixed attitudes toward social risk screening during CPS investigations. Consistent with prior research, health care professionals reported limited communication with CPS caseworkers about patients but suggested that relationships with child welfare professionals might reduce these barriers. Child welfare professionals described the poor quality of information provided in referrals from medical settings. Caseworkers also recognized that improved communication could support better understanding of maltreatment concerns and sharing of outcomes of CPS investigation.ConclusionsOur project extends previously published research by describing potential benefits of child welfare and child health care collaboration in cases of suspected maltreatment. Lack of effective cross-sector communication and concerns about confidentiality present significant barriers to uptake of these collaborative practices.     

Factors associated with the decision of a French hospital to report child abuse to judicial rather than administrative authorities

ObjectivesTwo independent sectors manage the child protection system in France: judicial and administrative protection. The choice between judicial or administrative reporting depends on the seriousness of the case. The goal of this study was to determine the characteristics associated with the decision in a French pediatric hospital to report child abuse to judicial instead of administrative authorities.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted. Participants were all the children (n = 83) who were admitted from 2017 to 2018 to the emergency department (ED) and the general ward of a pediatric university hospital in France, and were reported for suspicion of child abuse by the professional teams. The children who were suspected victims of sexual abuse were excluded. Multivariate logistic regressions were used.ResultsA total of 47 children were reported to judicial authorities, and 36 to administrative authorities. Their median age was 7 years. Suspicion of physical abuse (odds ratio [OR]: 21.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5–99.1), cases reported by the pediatric ward team (OR: 9.1; 95% CI: 1.9–43.6), adult person different from parents who accompanied the child to the ED (OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 1.2–28.6), and perception of parental behavior as inappropriate and non-cooperative (OR: 6.6; 95% CI: 1.4–29.6) were associated with a higher risk of the case being reported to judicial authorities. Data were often unavailable for parental health issues, history of child abuse, and intimate partner violence.ConclusionSome factors associated with the choice of report type were most likely quite subjective. Better documentation and standardization are needed.     

Quality improvement for neonatal nurses, part II: using a PDSA quality improvement cycle approach to implement an oral feeding progression guideline for premature infants

The development of clinical practice guidelines involving multiple health care providers presents a challenge in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Implementation and evaluation of the guideline is as important as the development of the guideline itself. We explored the use of a quality improvement approach in the implementation of a feeding framework. A Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement cycle model was used to implement and evaluate a stepwise oral infant feeding guideline with emphasis on parent and care provider satisfaction. Three PDSA cycles were conducted, with each cycle resulting in modifications to use of the framework and development of knowledge translation and parent education techniques and tools. A PDSA cycle approach can be used effectively in guideline implementation and evaluation involving multidisciplinary health care professionals. This is Part II of a two-part series. Part I introduced the concept of quality improvement and tools for advancing practice changes.     

To report or not to report: examination of the initial primary care management of suspicious childhood injuries

ObjectiveThis study examined the validity of primary health care providers’ (PHCPs) assessment of suspicion that an injury was caused by child abuse and their decision to report suspected child abuse to child protective services (CPS).MethodsBy using a subsample of injuries drawn from the 15,003 childhood injuries evaluated in the Child Abuse Recognition and Evaluation Study, PHCPs completed telephone interviews concerning a stratified sample (no suspicion of abuse; suspicious but not reported; and suspicious of abuse and reported) of 111 injury visits. Two techniques were used to validate the PHCPs’ initial decision: expert review and provider retrospective self-assessment. Five child abuse experts reviewed clinical vignettes created by using data prospectively collected by PHCPs about the patient encounter. The PHCPs’ opinions 6 weeks and 6 months after the injury-related visits were elicited and analyzed.ResultsPHCPs and experts agreed about the suspicion of abuse in 81% of the cases of physical injury. PHCPs did not report 21% of injuries that experts would have reported. Compared with expert reviewers, PHCPs had a 68% sensitivity and 96% specificity in reporting child abuse. A PHCP’s decision to report suspected child abuse to CPS did not reduce the frequency of primary care follow-up in the 6 months after the index visit. PCHPs received information from their state CPS in 70% of the reported cases.ConclusionsChild abuse experts and PHCPs are in general agreement concerning the assessment of suspected child physical abuse, although experts would have reported suspected abuse to CPS more frequently than the PHCPs. Future training should focus on clear guidance for better recognition of injuries that are suspicious for child abuse and state laws that mandate reporting.     

Health care providers' experience reporting child abuse in the primary care setting. Pediatric Practice Research Group

OBJECTIVES: To describe (1) primary care providers' experiences identifying and reporting suspected child abuse to child protective services (CPS) and (2) variables affecting providers' reporting behavior. DESIGN AND METHODS: Health care providers (76 physicians, 8 nurse practitioners, and 1 physician assistant) in a regional practice-based network completed written surveys that collected information about the demographic characteristics of each provider and practice; the provider's career experience with child abuse; and the provider's previous year's experience identifying and reporting suspected child abuse, including experience with CPS. RESULTS: All providers (N = 85) in 17 participating practices completed the survey. In the preceding 1 year, 48 respondents (56%) indicated that they had treated a child they suspected was abused, for an estimated total of 152 abused children. Seven (8%) of 85 providers did not report a total of 7 children with suspected abuse (5% of all suspected cases). A majority of providers (63%; n = 29) believed that children who were reported had not benefited from CPS intervention, and 21 (49%) indicated that their experience with CPS made them less willing to report future cases of suspected abuse. Providers who had some formal education in child abuse after residency were 10 times more likely to report all abuse than were providers who had none. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers report most, but not all, cases of suspected child abuse that they identify. Past negative experience with CPS and perceived lack of benefit to the child were common reasons given by providers for not reporting. Education increases the probability that providers will report suspected abuse.     

Barriers to and Consequences of Mandated Reporting of Child Abuse by Nurse Practitioners

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to examine the experiences of pediatric nurse practitioners (PNPs) in the identification and management of child abuse, determine the frequency of their reporting, and describe the effects, attitudes, and confidence in reporting child abuse.MethodsA survey based on the 2006 CARES survey was disseminated via e-mail through use of Survey Monkey to 5,764 PNP members of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. The data from this survey were then subjected to statistical analysis, and the resultant findings were compared and contrasted with other similar studies.ResultsData analysis revealed that smaller numbers of PNPs in the sample group failed to report suspected child abuse than did their physician colleagues. PNPs and physicians encountered similar perceived barriers to reporting and used similar processes in dealing with them. Both physicians and PNPs with recent child abuse continuing education hours expressed greater confidence in child abuse management skills and were more likely to report suspected cases of abuse.DiscussionMuch information was learned about PNP reporting practices regarding child abuse. The most significant facts that emerged from this study were that all health care providers require further child abuse education, both in their curriculum preparation and continuing education, to effectively diagnose and manage child abuse.     

Inflicted traumatic brain injury: advances in evaluation and collaborative diagnosis

The determination that a traumatic brain injury is not accidental requires data collection from multiple domains: historical, clinical, laboratory, radiographic, environmental and psychosocial. These essential, yet disparate, types of information must be synthesized in a collaborative and interdisciplinary process to formulate a medical opinion with regard to the cause of an injury, and the final opinion has tremendous consequences for children and families. Medically directed child protection teams have emerged as the standard of care in many children's hospitals and child abuse pediatrics is now a recognized medical subspecialty with board certification available in the next several years. Not only do the child and family benefit from this coordinated effort, but there are also great benefits for the members of the child protection team: more clearly defined responsibilities, redirected focus on treatment for the surgeon, and increased confidence that the opinion is based upon consensus and current scientific knowledge. By this process and its division of labor, the child abuse pediatrician assumes responsibility for ensuring that a final medical opinion is arrived at, and then advocates for appropriate disposition for the child. The child abuse pediatrician is responsible for establishing institutional standards for family evaluation, collecting all necessary medical data and directing a consensus-based decision making process that is based upon current medical knowledge, medical literature and experience. The child abuse pediatrician also assumes the role of primary communication conduit for investigational agencies and the courts. The neurosurgeon is a key member of the child protection team and relies on the team to obtain necessary historical information to address consistency of the mechanism with the sustained injuries and has an integral role in determining the team's final opinion. An interdisciplinary response to inflicted traumatic brain injury is the cornerstone for establishing a rigorous standard of care; it also fosters education across medical subspecialties where controversy has been a significant part of the landscape. Valid and useful clinical research that describes head injury as accidental or inflicted can only be performed in the context of an interdisciplinary, medically directed child protection team that strives for objectivity and precision in the determination of the manner of an injury.     

Early case conferences shorten length of stay in children admitted to hospital with suspected child abuse

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of two models for the management of children admitted to hospital with suspected child abuse: routine early case conferencing versus standard evaluation. METHODS: Between March 2001 and February 2002 professionals from the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria Police and Child Protection services collaborated on a randomized controlled study involving children admitted to hospital with suspected child abuse. The intervention group (n = 13) received a case conference within 24 h of the child's admission to hospital. The control group (n = 12) were managed according to standard procedures whereby each organization conducted their own evaluation (and a case conference might or might not have been held). Patients were followed for 3 months with data collected from all three professional groups. RESULTS: The process of evaluation, the eventual diagnosis of child abuse and the confidence with which professionals made this diagnosis was not significantly different between the groups. Case conferences were judged to be useful regardless of their timing. Mean length of stay in the intervention group was significantly less than in controls (42.4 h vs 99.7 h, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Early case conferences appear to shorten the period of time children spend in hospital when child abuse is suspected. This has significant implications for reducing costs for all organizations involved in the evaluation of suspected child abuse.     

Is There a Relationship Between Lacking a Primary Care Provider and Child Abuse?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between lacking a primary care provider and child abuse. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of 1462 children aged 相似文献   

A resilience-based approach to the recognition and response of child sexual abuse

Child sexual abuse is a clear violation of children's rights with known lifelong devastating consequences. It occurs across all ages, sexes and cultures. Cases are underreported and may not be disclosed at first due to its secretive and hidden nature. It is clear that children do try to disclose but are not always heard or believed. In this paper we delve deeper into the recognition and response to suspected cases of child sexual abuse and the importance of working within a multidisciplinary team to best safeguard the victims. We emphasize the importance of asking questions in a direct, empathic and developmentally appropriate manner, such that the child feels believed and supported. The physical and behavioural changes are described in suspected cases and possible differential diagnoses. We propose a resilience-based framework to the management and prevention of child sexual abuse.     

Current pediatric roles in child abuse and neglect.

Many pediatricians are being called on to undertake expanded roles in the field of child abuse and neglect, whether as a practicing pediatrician, a hospital-based child abuse consultant, or as a child protection team pediatrician. The practicing pediatrician must consider the diagnosis of child abuse and neglect, confirm the diagnosis, report all suspected cases to child protective services, hospitalize any abused child who needs protection, and provide preventive services. The hospital-based child abuse consultant should provide consultation to primary physicians, report seriously injured cases for the primary physician or surgeon, provide expert medical testimony on difficult to prove cases, teach house staff and medical students about child abuse and neglect, and improve treatment services for abused children who are hospitalized. The child protection team pediatrician will usually become involved in the broader problem of improving team decision making and the interagency system that deals with child abuse and neglect.     

Questions autour du placement dans les situations de maltraitance à enfant

When a professional finds himself in a situation of child abuse, the question of putting the child into care arises quickly. Consequently, personal views and images of children in care come to mind but this also brings up a desire and sometimes a duty to act. Act to protect the child by moving him away from the source of the aggression. The clinician should be mindful of acting hastily and must nevertheless evaluate the legitimacy of moving the child away. The article suggests discussing the evaluation criteria for putting the child into care, starting with the experience of a multi-disciplinary team which offers help and care to abused minors.     

A-TEAM: An Interprofessional Approach to Mandated Reporting in the Hospital Setting

Reporting suspected child maltreatment in pediatric settings presents unique challenges. Variation in mandated reporter training may lead to discomfort and emotional dysregulation. Failure to collaborate inter-professionally potentially results in suboptimal care for vulnerable children and families. A-TEAM promotes awareness, transparency, empathy, a nonjudgmental strategy, and management by an interprofessional team when referring patients for child protective services evaluation. A faculty trained in pediatric trauma nursing led the development of A-TEAM. Integrating nursing and social work expertise protects the integrity of family-centered patient care. The A-TEAM approach may be a valuable contribution to the continuing education of pediatric health care professionals.     

Prise en charge et prévention de la maltraitance au Québec: programme de pédiatrie sociojuridique de l''hôpital Sainte-Justine à Montréal

In Quebec, the Child's Protection law protects the child from birth until 18 years of age when child abuse or neglect is suspected. Since 1990, the program of the Child Protection Clinic of Sainte-Justine Hospital (Montreal) offers a special unit for evaluation and prevention of child abuse and neglect, constituted by a multidisciplinary team including five pediatricians. About 500 children are referred each year in external consultations or from hospital units. In addition, the pediatricians participate in the “programme Santé-Enfance-Jeunesse”, a prevention program in the Montreal area. They also act as expert witnesses in court. Thus Quebec's pediatricians fully participate in a child's protection with their activities in different levels of diagnosis, management and prevention of child abuse and neglect     

Child abuse study among Swedish physicians and medical students

Background: The purpose of the present paper was to examine the attitudes and experiences of reporting child abuse and neglect among primary care and hospital‐based physicians and to study the responses of physicians and medical students to case vignettes suggestive of possible physical abuse or neglect. Methods: Physicians at the child health centers in Göteborg primary care (n= 44) and the general pediatricians at the pediatric hospital (n= 21) in Göteborg answered a questionnaire regarding their attitude and experiences reporting child abuse and neglect. The physicians and medical students (n= 34) responded to three case vignettes in which child abuse and neglect could be suspected. Results: A majority of the physicians had reported child abuse and neglect to the social services (80%). No differences were found between primary care and hospital‐based physicians in terms of reporting or attitudes. Two‐thirds of the physicians had suspected child abuse and neglect and decided not to report, and the major reason for not reporting was a lack of confidence in social services organization. Twenty‐one percent had never reported a child for abuse or neglect during their working career. Medical students were more likely to report hypothetical cases than physicians. Conclusion: Many physicians have reported child abuse to social services but also have neglected to do so even when suspecting abuse. It is important that medical students’ willingness to report is continued when starting to work clinically and that all physicians should be continuously educated.     

Nurse-Led Telephone Follow-Up to Improve Parent Promotion of Healthy Behaviors in Young Children With Motivational Interviewing Techniques

IntroductionThe American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends primary care–based health promotion for obesity prevention at all visits, focusing on nutrition and activity.MethodsIn this quality improvement project, a primary care innovation was developed to support parents in promoting healthy habits in their children ages 2 to 5 years old. Nurse-led telephone support using motivational interviewing was implemented during two follow-up phone calls aimed at helping parent–child dyads reach self-created activity or nutrition goals.ResultsParent-rated confidence and motivation related to meeting these goals showed significant increases. During the second call, 80% self-reported goal completion and high satisfaction with the visits. Registered nurses reported a significant increase in their self-efficacy of communication with parents.DiscussionThis project showed the feasibility of using nurse telephone visits in an urban low-income primary care setting to improve parental recognition and understanding of healthy habits that align with American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for obesity prevention.     

Child abuse recognition and reporting: supports and resources for changing the paradigm

As shown previously in the Child Abuse Recognition Experience Study (CARES), primary care providers reported that they decided not to report a substantial proportion of injuries that they suspected might have resulted from abuse. The most serious cases result in death. This article provides detailed reports of 2 illustrative cases from the author's experience as a member of a multidisciplinary child fatality review team and discusses several alternative legal mechanisms for improving mandated reporting. Regional centers of excellence in child protection may be an effective way of improving child protection; current proposals to establish such centers are reviewed.