Outcomes of HTLV-1 Carriers with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundThe human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is associated with aggressive diseases, such as adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). However, less is known on the impact of HTLV-1 infection in non-ATLL hematologic malignancies. We aimed to investigate if HTLV-1 carriers with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have worse survival outcomes than non-HTLV-1 carriers.Materials and MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective cohort study by matching HTLV-1 carriers to non-carriers based on age, sex, Ann Arbor stage, and year of diagnosis. Our outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS between carriers and non-carriers. We fitted multivariate Cox regression models to assess the mortality and recurrence/disease progression risk of HTLV-1 infection.ResultsA total of 188 patients, 66 with HTLV-1 infection and 122 without HTLV-1, were included in the study. HTLV-1 carriers had higher extranodal involvement than non-carriers (47% vs. 27%, P = .010). With a median follow-up of 78 months (95% CI: 41-90 months), HTLV-1 carriers had a similar 5 year OS (41% vs. 42%, P = .940) and PFS (34% vs. 32%, P = .691) compared to non-carriers. In the multivariate Cox analysis, HTLV-1 infection was not associated with worse OS (aHR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.64-1.50) or PFS (aHR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.60-1.34).ConclusionHTLV-1 carriers with DLBCL did not have worse survival outcomes compared to non-carriers. Our results suggest that clinicians should follow standard guidelines for DLBCL management on HTLV-1 seropositive patients.     

Timing of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Current Therapies

BackgroundAutologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) during the initial treatment of multiple myeloma has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS). While awaiting further prospective data, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients at our program.Patients and MethodsWe included consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had undergone stem cell harvest (SCH) from 2005 to 2014 and separated them into early (SCT within 12 months of diagnosis) and delayed (all others, including SCT not yet) groups. The outcomes were OS, PFS to first relapse, and PFS to second relapse.ResultsOf the 514 patients who had undergone SCH, 227 were in the early and 287 in the delayed groups. Patients in the delayed group who had undergone SCT had received more therapy before SCT (55% had received ≥ 2 lines vs. 6% in the early group; P < .001), had had more progressive disease at SCT (34% vs. 4%; P < .001), had received melphalan doses < 200 mg/m² (22% vs. 10%; P = .001), and had had lower rates of very good partial response or better after SCT (58% vs. 79%; P = .001). On multivariable analysis, no differences were found in median OS (90 vs. 84 months; P = .093), PFS to first relapse (40 vs. 37 months; P = .552), or PFS to second relapse (54 vs. 52 months; P = .488) between the early and delayed groups.ConclusionDelaying SCT did not affect OS or even PFS to second relapse in our cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had received current era induction therapy.     

Increased Bone Marrow Plasma-Cell Percentage Predicts Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

BackgroundPrevious reports have suggested that a higher bone marrow plasma-cell percentage (BMPC%) is associated with worse outcomes. However, it is unknown whether BMPC% is an independent predictor because genetic information was not available at that time. Currently the impact of BMPC% at diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is not well described.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated the prognostic impact of BMPC% ≥ 60% versus < 60% in 1426 newly diagnosed MM patients. All patients had an estimation of their BMPC% at diagnosis, and the highest percentage was used. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS using the Cox proportional hazards model were performed for age, Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) score, creatinine level, and BMPC%.ResultsBMPC% ≥ 60% was found in 562 patients (39%), and the median PFS was shorter for these patients compared to BMPC% < 60% (22.6 vs. 32.1 months; P < .0001). Also, for OS, the median was shorter for the higher BMPC% group (53.4 vs. 75.4 months; P < .0001). On the multivariate analysis for PFS, age ≥ 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; P < .0001), R-ISS (1-2 vs. 3) (HR, 0.49; P < .0001), and BMPC% ≥ 60% (HR, 1.23; P = .015) were predictive. On the multivariate analysis for OS, age ≥ 65 years (HR, 2.23; P < .001), R-ISS (1-2 vs. 3) (HR, 0.41; P < .0001), and BMPC% ≥ 60% (HR, 1.24; P = .02) were also predictive.ConclusionBMPC% ≥ 60% at diagnosis is predictive for PFS and OS, even in a multivariate analysis that included known prognostic factors for MM.     

Postprogression survival for first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BackgroundWith the increasing availability of active agents, the importance of postprogression survival (PPS) has been recognised for several malignancies. However, little is known of PPS in advanced gastric cancer.Patients and methodsA literature search identified 43 randomised trials in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer. We partitioned overall survival (OS) into progression-free survival (PFS) and PPS, and then examined the correlation between median OS and either median PFS or median PPS. The correlation between differences in OS (ΔOS) and those in PFS (ΔPFS) between trial arms was also investigated.ResultsThe average median OS was significantly longer in recent (2006 and later) trials than in older (2005 and earlier) trials (10.60 versus 8.64 months, P < 0.001), as was the average median PPS (5.34 versus 3.74 months, P = 0.001). Median PPS was correlated with median OS for all trials (r = 0.732), and this correlation was more pronounced in recent trials (r = 0.850). By contrast, the correlation between median PFS and median OS was less pronounced in recent trials (r = 0.282), as was that between ΔPFS and ΔOS (r = 0.365).ConclusionAn increase in median PPS was found in accordance with an increase in median OS in recent trials compared with older trials for patients with advanced gastric cancer.     

Assessment of progression-free survival as a surrogate end-point for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundTo determine suitability of progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate end-point for overall survival (OS), we evaluated the relationship between PFS and OS in 750 treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who received sunitinib or interferon-alpha (IFN-α) in a phase III study.MethodsThe relationship between PFS and post-progression survival (PPS; the difference between PFS and OS) was studied, which correctly removes inherent dependencies between PFS and OS, to properly estimate whether and to what extent PFS can serve as a surrogate for OS. A Weibull parametric model to failure time data was fit to determine whether longer PFS was significantly and meaningfully predictive of longer PPS. In a sensitivity analysis by Kaplan–Meier non-parametric method, PPS curves for three approximately equal numbered groups of patients categorised by PFS were compared by log-rank test.ResultsIn the Weibull parametric model, longer PFS was significantly predictive of longer PPS (P < 0.001). The model also allowed prediction of estimated median PPS duration from actual PFS times. In the Kaplan–Meier (non-parametric) analysis, incrementally longer PFS was also associated with longer PPS, and the PPS curves for the three PFS groups were significantly different (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsA positive relationship was found between PFS and PPS duration in individual mRCC patients randomised to first-line treatment with sunitinib or IFN-α. These results indicate that PFS can act as a surrogate end-point for OS in the first-line mRCC setting and provide clinical researchers with a potentially useful approach to estimate median PPS based on PFS.     

Prognostic Impact of Loss of SETD2 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic impact of immunohistochemical expression of SETD2 in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).Patients and MethodsA total of 662 patients with primary or metastatic ccRCC were evaluated. Two genitourinary pathologist reviewed all of the cases for uniform reclassification and determined the selection of the most representative tumor areas for construction of the tissue microarray (TMA).ResultsSETD2 nuclear staining showed that 101 areas (15.3%) had negative expression, and 561 areas (84,7%) had positive expression of SETD2. The protein expression of SETD2 was associated with clinical stage (P < .001), pathological stage (P < .001), tumor size (P < .001), perinephric fat invasion (P < .001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P = .004), surgery type (P < .001), International Society of Urologic Pathologists grade (P < .001), and tumor necrosis (P < .001). SETD2 influenced disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). DSS rates in patients with positive and negative expression of SETD2 were 90.2% and 58.4%, respectively (P < .001). OS rates in patients with positive and negative expression of SETD2 were 87% and 55.4%, respectively (P < .001). In a multivariate Cox analysis, low SETD2 expression was an independent predictor of DSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.690; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0582.700; P = .031) and OS (HR, 1.641; 95% CI, 1.039-2.593; P = .037).ConclusionOur study showed that the negative expression of SETD2 was associated with a worse prognosis, and it was an independent predictor of survival in patients with ccRCC. We believe that the protein expression of SETD2 is an important biomarker in the management of patients with ccRCC.     

Biological Characteristics and Long-term Outcomes in Node-negative Breast Cancer

BackgroundBecause the risk of relapse of node-negative breast cancer (BC) is varying, we evaluated the prognosis of patients with this disease and the factors associated with increased risk of relapse.Patients and MethodsThe clinical charts of patients with BC with evidence of negative nodes and with a potential ≥ 5-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsWe analyzed 1276 patients. Over a median follow-up of 71.6 months (range, 1-227.2 months), we observed 159 events of relapse or death. The median RFS was 170 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 192 months. At univariate analysis, older age, negative hormonal receptors, larger tumor size and higher proliferation index (Ki67) were associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS (P < .05); higher grading was associated with worse RFS (P = .01). At multivariate analysis for RFS, age, Ki67 and tumor size confirmed their independent prognostic role. At multivariate analysis for OS, age and positive hormonal receptors showed an independent prognostic role. We observed no differences in prognosis between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive and triple-negative (TN) BC, but TNBC showed a worse OS compared with luminal-like BC.ConclusionsIn node-negative BC, age, hormone receptor status, tumor size and Ki67 were prognostic factors. The TNBC subtype was not associated with poorer prognosis compared with the HER2-positive subtype, but showed a worse OS compared with luminal-like BC.     

Phase I Trial of Cisplatin,Pemetrexed, and Imatinib Mesylate in Chemonaive Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

BackgroundWe conducted a phase I trial of cisplatin/pemetrexed/imatinib mesylate, an oral platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitor, in chemonaive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).MethodsA standard 3 + 3 dose-escalating trial was used with the end points of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), response rate, survival, safety/toxicity, and tumor PDGFR levels.ResultsSeventeen patients with MPM were enrolled. The most common (any grade) side effects were nausea, fatigue, hypomagnesemia, and anemia. The MTD was established at dose level 3 (imatinib 600 mg) with a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of nausea and vomiting. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months. Patients with a sarcomatoid subtype had worse PFS (P = .01) and OS (P = .009), whereas they had a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-1 predicted for improved OS (P = .001) and PFS (P = .013). The 6 patients who completed all 6 treatment cycles had better OS (P = .006); the median PFS was 9.6 months and the OS was 22.4 months. In the translational studies, 14 patients had adequate tumor tissue that could be assessed for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Patients with higher than median p-PDGFRα IHC expression had a better OS (P = .013). When assessed as a continuous variable, higher p-PDGFRα in tumor cells correlated with an improved OS (P = .045). None of the other 4 IHC biomarkers were predictive or prognostic for survival. Twelve patients had successful PDGFRB FISH results, but none met the criteria of ≥ 4 copies of the PDGFRB gene; thus a correlation with clinical outcomes could not be done.ConclusionThe cisplatin/pemetrexed/imatinib mesylate combination had clinical benefit in some patients with MPM but was not well tolerated. Further investigation into alternative antiangiogenic agents, including PDGFRα inhibitors, is warranted.     

Sequential Use of Androgen Receptor Axis-targeted Agents in Chemotherapy-naive Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis With 3-Year Follow-up

BackgroundThere has been no established clinical evidence for using sequential treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Despite evident cross-resistance, androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARTAs), namely abiraterone (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZ), are often used sequentially owing to less toxicity compared with chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsA multicenter retrospective review of chemotherapy-naive patients with CRPC who had received ABI followed by ENZ (ABI-to-ENZ) or ENZ followed by ABI (ENZ-to-ABI) was conducted. Combined progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% PSA decline) to each drug were compared between the 2 groups at the median follow-up of 36.0 months.ResultsThere were no significant differences in combined PFS (12.4 vs. 10.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.23; P = .6594) or OS (28.3 vs 29.3 months; HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66-1.38; P = .8314) between the ABI-to-ENZ and ENZ-to-ABI groups. PSA response rate was not significantly different in first-line ARTAs (48.9% vs. 58.4%; P = .153) but significantly higher in ENZ as a second-line ARTA (40.4% vs. 13.7%; P < .0001). Although multivariate analysis revealed that the ABI-to-ENZ sequence was associated with favorable PFS on second-line ARTA (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.85; P = .0019), it was not associated with an increased combined PFS or OS.ConclusionWith relatively longer follow-up, ARTA sequence did not affect clinical outcomes of CRPC treatment except for PSA response and PFS on a second-line ARTA. These findings will be useful information in clinical decision-making, particularly in chemotherapy-unfit patients with CRPC.     

Comparison of Upfront Transplantation and Pretransplant Cytoreductive Therapy for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative therapy for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the value of pretransplant cytoreduction remains debatable.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively compared the outcomes of upfront transplantation and pretransplant cytoreduction. Of 69 patients, 39 received upfront allo-HSCT and 30 received pretransplant cytoreduction, including chemotherapy (n = 16), hypomethylating agents (HMAs, n = 6), and HMAs with chemotherapy (n = 8).ResultsThe upfront group achieved similar overall survival (OS) and a trend of better progression-free survival (PFS) from diagnosis compared with the cytoreduction group (3-year PFS, 64.0% vs. 44.4%, P = .076). Posttransplant outcomes were comparable between the two groups in terms of OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In patients with ≥2 mutations, the upfront group achieved better OS and PFS (3-year OS, 100.0% vs. 68.6%, P = .044; 3-year PFS: 92.3% vs. 43.9%, P = .016) than the cytoreduction group. Patients achieving remission in the cytoreduction group had outcomes similar to the upfront group, but those without remission before transplantation had a significantly worse posttransplant OS (3-year OS, 46.7% vs. 75.7%, P = .038). Patients with pretransplant HMAs had better PFS than those with chemotherapy or HMAs plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05).ConclusionCompared with pretransplant cytoreduction, upfront allo-HSCT might provide more benefit to some patients with advanced MDS if there are suitable donors. HMAs would be a good alternative during the donor search.     

Platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the Institut Curie experience

BackgroundAlthough recent experimental data strongly suggest that platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT) could improve the outcome of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), clinical data are lacking. Here, the authors reviewed clinical outcome in patients with metastatic TNBC treated with PBCT.Patients and methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients (N = 143) treated for metastatic breast cancer with PBCT between 2000 and 2008, at Institut Curie, Paris, France. Ninety-three of them (63.7%) had TNBC. One-hundred twenty patients received cisplatin (CDDP). The main combination used was CDDP–ifosfamide, in 101 patients (70.2%).ResultsMedian follow-up was 44 months. For the overall population (N = 143), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 11 and 5 months, respectively. Objective response rate was 33.3% in the TNBC group versus 22% in non-TNBC, P = 0.1. We observed no difference of OS, PFS and response duration. Other prognostic factors for poor OS were visceral metastasis sites (P < 0.001). One patient died from sepsis during aplasia, 15 had to switch from CDDP to carboplatin because of CDDP-related toxicity.ConclusionsMetastatic TNBC patients treated with PBCT tended to have a higher response rate, without a significant improvement of PFS or OS, compared with other subtypes. Toxicity was acceptable. Longer observation and further analysis are warranted.     

Is Axitinib Still a Valid Option for mRCC in the Second-Line Setting? Prognostic Factor Analyses From the AXIS Trial

BackgroundAxitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) previously treated with sunitinib in the AXIS trial. We report post hoc analyses evaluating patient subgroups that may benefit more from axitinib in this setting.Patients and MethodsAXIS was an open-label randomized phase 3 trial (NCT00678392) in mRCC patients with disease that failed to respond to one prior systemic therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated potential prognostic factors for improved PFS and overall survival (OS) after sunitinib. PFS and OS of axitinib versus sorafenib were assessed within subgroups identified according to these factors.ResultsOf 723 patients, 389 received first-line sunitinib; 194 and 195 were randomized to second-line axitinib and sorafenib, respectively. Identified prognostic factors were: nonbulky disease (sum of the longest diameter < 98 mm), favorable/intermediate risk disease (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center or International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria), and no bone or liver metastases. In patients with all of these prognostic factors (n = 86), significantly longer PFS was observed for axitinib versus sorafenib (hazard ratio = 0.476; 95% confidence interval, 0.263-0.863; 2-sided P = .0126). OS (hazard ratio = 0.902; 95% confidence interval, 0.457-1.780; 2-sided P = .7661) was similar between treatments. Across subgroups, PFS was generally longer in patients treated with axitinib versus sorafenib, and OS was generally similar between the two treatments.ConclusionIn patients with mRCC, axitinib remains a suitable second-line treatment option across multiple subgroups. A relevant reduction in the risk of a PFS event was observed for axitinib compared to sorafenib in selected subgroups of patients.     

Docetaxel–cisplatin might be superior to docetaxel–capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) may be more sensitive to platinum. This study was to compare platinum-based regimen with nonplatinum regimen in the first-line treatment of advanced TNBC.Patients and methodsEligible metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) women without prior treatment for advanced disease were randomized (1 : 1) to receive either docetaxel–cisplatin (TP) or docetaxel –capecitabine (TX) q3w for up to 6 cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In total 53 patients were enrolled.ResultsThe median follow-up was 24 months. ORR was higher in the TP group than in the TX group (63.0% versus 15.4%, P = 0.001). PFS was more than doubled (10.9 months versus 4.8 months, P < 0.001) and median OS was also greatly improved (32.8 months versus 21.5 months, P = 0.027). Toxic effects were not different except G3/4 vomiting and G2/3 hand-foot syndrome.ConclusionsThis study suggested that cisplatin-based chemotherapy was superior to capecitabine-based regimen in the first-line treatment of mTNBC, as measured by ORR, PFS and OS. Further large-scale study should be warranted. These results are not sufficient to change clinical practice.     

Incidence of Brain Metastases in Women Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Implications for Screening

PurposePatients with metastatic breast cancer may develop brain metastases. Our study identified high-risk patients to refine selection criteria for BM screening approaches.PatientsWe reviewed breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at a single university center between 2005 and 2019.MethodsCompeting risks analysis was performed with the Fine and Gray model to analyze the cumulative incidence of BM and loco-regional recurrence. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Multivariable analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards regression to identify factors predictive for development of BM. Statistical significance was determined as a 2-sided P value of <.05.ResultsIn total, 112 patients experienced distant failure (DF) and 49 patients developed BM. Twenty patients with BM (41%) presented with symptoms requiring craniotomy +/- whole brain radiation treatment. Patients with BM were significantly more likely to have local (P < .01) and regional (P < .01) failure. On multivariable analysis, age <40 years (P = .011), presence of lung metastases (P < .0001), and residual nodal disease with >4 lymph nodes positive after NAC (P = .024) all predicted for increased likelihood of BM. Patients with these criteria had higher likelihoods of having BM (P = .013) and worse PFS (P = .044). On multivariable analysis for OS, presence of lung metastases was the most significant predictor of poor outcome (P < .0001).ConclusionWe propose a study of screening brain MRI for young (<40 years) patients with breast cancer receiving NAC and patients who develop metastatic disease post-NAC, especially those with lung involvement.     

Incorporation of the SUVmax Measured From FDG PET and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Improves Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the value of incorporation 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for improving prediction of clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (LA NSCLC).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 138 patients with unresectable LA NSCLC at our institution from July 2010 to August 2017. Spearman correlation analyses were used to estimate the correlations between SUVmax and NLR level. The univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic indicators, including the incorporation of SUVmax and NLR. We defined the SUVmax and NLR grade (SNG = 0, 1, or 2) score as the number of risk factors among (1) SUVmax > 11.95 and (2) NLR > 3.82. The SNG score prognostic value was evaluated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that tumor stage, SUVmax, SUVmean, NLR, and SNG score were significantly associated with OS and PFS in patients with LA NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated significant differences in both OS and PFS among patients in SNG score (OS, P < .001; PFS, P < .001). Spearman correlation analyses showed that SUVmax had a correlation with the NLR (r = 0.237; P = .005). In subgroup analyses for patients with tumor pathologic stage IIIA/IIIB, we found that the SNG score was significantly associated with OS and PFS in each subgroup (P < .001, P < .001 for OS and P = .027, P < .001 for PFS, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the SNG score was a significantly independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.612; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-2.246; P = .005) and PFS (hazard ratio, 2.241; 95% confidence interval, 1.486-3.379; P < .001).ConclusionIncorporation of the SUVmax and NLR improves prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with LA NSCLC.     

Is change in blood pressure a biomarker of pazopanib and sunitinib efficacy in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma?

AimPazopanib, an oral antiangiogenic agent, is associated with improved outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In this retrospective analysis, we explore hypertension, an on-target adverse event, as a predictive marker.MethodsData from the pazopanib arm of the phase III COMPARZ trial (NCT00720941) comprised the test set. Pooled data from phase II (NCT00244764) and III (NCT00334282) pazopanib trials comprised the validation set. Data from the sunitinib arm of COMPARZ were analysed separately. Measures of efficacy were response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was the primary metric, and systolic hypertension (S-HTN) and diastolic hypertension (D-HTN) were secondary metrics; 4- and 12-week landmark analyses were performed.ResultsAnalyses revealed no significant associations at the landmarks between response and MAP. We observed a trend towards improved PFS with S-HTN at week 4 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79, P = 0.060) and week 12 (HR = 0.75, P = 0.073) among pazopanib-treated patients in COMPARZ. This trend was not confirmed at week 12 in the validation set or in sunitinib-treated patients. In the test set, there was a trend towards increased OS in patients with S-HTN by week 4 (HR = 0.76, P = 0.062) and with D-HTN by week 4 (HR = 0.71, P = 0.016) but not by week 12. No significant differences in OS were observed in sunitinib-treated patients for S-HTN or D-HTN.ConclusionNeither hypertension nor any blood pressure elevation above baseline was associated with efficacy outcomes of pazopanib or sunitinib. Accordingly, management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hypertension is unlikely to compromise outcome.     

Patients Treated With Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Have Inferior Outcomes If Previously Treated With Platinum-based Chemoradiation

IntroductionThe standard of care for locoregionally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer is concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation. Many patients relapse, and subsequent systemic treatment may involve platinum-doublet chemotherapy. It is not known if prior platinum-based chemoradiation influences the response to platinum-based chemotherapy given subsequently for relapse. Therefore, we compared outcomes in these patients with those in patients without prior treatment.MethodsA retrospective study of patients who had been treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy for de novo metastatic disease or recurrent non–small-cell lung cancer after receiving platinum-based chemoradiation. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 104 patients were analyzed. The median age was 63 years (range, 35-81 years), with 63 (61%) patients with newly diagnosed disease and with 41 (39%) who were previously treated. The response rate was significantly lower for those previously exposed to chemoradiation (10% vs. 29%: P = .001), as was the median PFS (3.6 months vs. 5.7 months; P = .002), and median overall survival (OS) (8.6 months vs. 12.1 months; P = .007). Only the treatment group was a significant predictor (P = .032) of PFS by univariate analysis. In univariate analysis; sex (men; P = .04), histology (squamous cell; P = .04), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale (P = .002), and treatment group (P = .023) predicted significantly inferior OS. Multivariate analysis showed that performance status was the only significant predictor of inferior OS.ConclusionOutcomes were inferior in patients previously exposed to platinum-based chemoradiation. An approach of stratifying such patients in future trials of chemotherapy should be adopted. Alternative options such as non–platinum-based agents or targeted therapies should be considered in this group.     

Dosimetric Predictors of Cardiotoxicity in Thoracic Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

BackgroundHigher cardiac radiotherapy (RT) doses when treating lung cancer are associated with worse overall survival (OS), although the direct association between cardiac dose and early cardiotoxicity is poorly understood. We hypothesized that RT doses to the heart and cardiac substructures are associated with under-reported early cardiotoxicity and worse OS.Patients and MethodsWe conducted an institutional retrospective review of lung cancer patients treated with conventionally fractionated RT from 2010 to 2015. Collected data included pre-RT cardiac risk factors, post-RT cardiotoxicities, and dose-volume parameters for cardiac substructures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of cardiotoxicity and OS.ResultsSeventy-six cases were evaluated with 1.2 years median follow-up. Cardiotoxicities included atrial arrhythmia (n = 5), pericardial effusion (n = 16), and valvular disease (n = 1). In univariate analysis, significant dose-volume predictors for cardiotoxicity included mean RT dose to structure of interest, volume of structure of interest receiving ≥30 Gy RT dose, and volume of structure of interest receiving ≥45 Gy RT dose (V45) to the atria, ventricles, and pericardium. Higher ventricular V45 was associated with post-RT cardiotoxicity in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; P = .027). Cardiotoxicity occurrence was a highly significant predictor of OS in multivariate analysis (HR, 12.7; P < .001), but higher ventricular V45 alone was not (HR, 0.78; P = .450).ConclusionEarly cardiac events were relatively common after lung cancer RT and associated with multiple cardiac dose-volume parameters. Occurrence of early cardiotoxicity was strongly associated with worse OS. In practice, early cardiotoxicity is under-reported, supporting the need for more detailed cardiac evaluations in high-risk patients to detect and address early cardiotoxicity.     

Six-Month Progression-Free Survival as the Primary Endpoint to Evaluate the Activity of New Agents as Second-line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

ObjectiveSecond-line systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) has substantial unmet needs, and current agents show dismal activity. Second-line trials of metastatic UC have used response rate (RR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoints, which may not reflect durable benefits. A more robust endpoint to identify signals of durable benefits when investigating new agents in second-line trials may expedite drug development. PFS at 6 months (PFS6) is a candidate endpoint, which may correlate with overall survival (OS) at 12 months (OS12) and may be applicable across cytostatic and cytotoxic agents.MethodsTen second-line phase II trials with individual patient outcomes data evaluating chemotherapy or biologics were combined for discovery, followed by external validation in a phase III trial. The relationship between PFS6/RR and OS12 was assessed at the trial level using Pearson correlation and weighted linear regression, and at the individual level using Pearson chi-square test with Yates continuity correction.ResultsIn the discovery dataset, a significant correlation was observed between PFS6 and OS12 at the trial (R² = 0.55, Pearson correlation = 0.66) and individual levels (82%, Қ = 0.45). Response correlated with OS12 at the individual level less robustly (78%, Қ = 0.36), and the trial level association was not statistically significant (R² = 0.16, Pearson correlation = 0.37). The correlation of PFS6 (81%, Қ = 0.44) appeared stronger than the correlation of response (76%, Қ = 0.17) with OS12 in the external validation dataset.ConclusionsPFS6 is strongly associated with OS12 and appears more optimal than RR to identify active second-line agents for advanced UC.