LOWER CALICEAL STONE CLEARANCE AFTER SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OR URETEROSCOPY: THE IMPACT OF LOWER POLE RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY

Purpose

We determine whether there is a significant relationship between the spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as seen on preoperative excretory urography (IVP), and the outcome after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for a solitary lower pole caliceal stone 15 mm. or less.

Materials and Methods

Between January 1992 and June 1996, 34 patients with 15 mm. or less solitary lower pole stone underwent ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy¹³ or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL [dagger]) with a Dornier HM3 lithotriptor [dagger] ^[21]. On pretreatment IVP lower pole infundibular length and width, infundibulopelvic angle of the stone bearing calix were measured. Stone size and area were determined from an abdominal plain x-ray. A plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder was obtained in all patients at a median followup of 12.3 and 8 months in the ureteroscopy and ESWL groups, respectively.[dagger] Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia.

Results

After initial therapy the overall stone-free rate was 62 and 52% in the ureteroscopy and ESWL groups, respectively. Stone-free status after ESWL was significantly related to each anatomical measurement. Infundibulopelvic angle 90 degrees or greater, and infundibular length less than 3 cm. and width greater than 5 mm. were each noted to correlate with an improved stone-free rate after ESWL. In contrast, the stone-free rate after ureteroscopy was not statistically significantly impacted by these anatomical features, although a clinical stone-free trend was identified relating to a favorable infundibular length and infundibulopelvic angle. The infundibulopelvic angle was 90 degrees or greater in 4 stone-free patients (12% overall), including 2 who underwent ureteroscopy and 2 who underwent ESWL. On the other hand, in 2 and 4 stone-free patients (18% overall) who underwent ureteroscopy and ESWL, respectively, favorable radiographic features consisted of a short, wide but acutely angulated infundibulum with the infundibulopelvic angle less than 90 degrees, and infundibular length less than 3 cm. and width 5 mm. or greater. In contrast, in 4 and 6 patients (29% overall) who underwent ureteroscopy and ESWL, respectively, all 3 radiographic features were unfavorable with the infundibulopelvic angle less than 90 degrees, and infundibular length greater than 3 cm. and width less than 5 mm. In these cases the stone-free rate was 50 and 17% after ureteroscopy and ESWL, respectively.

Conclusions

The 3 major radiographic features of the lower pole calix (infundibulopelvic angle, and infundibular length and width) can be easily measured on standard IVP using a ruler and protractor. Each factor individually has a statistically significant influence on stone clearance after ESWL. A wide infundibulopelvic angle or short infundibular length and broad infundibular width regardless of infundibulopelvic angle are significant favorable factors for stone clearance following ESWL. Conversely, these factors have a cumulatively negative effect on the stone clearance rate after ESWL when they are all unfavorable. In ureteroscopy spatial anatomy has less of a role in regard to stone clearance but it may have a negative impact when there is uniformly unfavorable anatomy.     

Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?

PURPOSE: We determined whether there is a significant relationship between the spatial anatomy of the lower pole on preoperative excretory urography and stone fragment clearance after shock wave lithotripsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anatomical factors affecting lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy were evaluated retrospectively in 108 patients. Stone-free status was assessed by renal computerized tomography with or without renal ultrasound. The stone-free rate at 3 months was correlated with lower pole infundibular length and width in mm. as well as with the lower pole infundibulopelvic angle in degrees. The statistical significance of each lower pole anatomical factor as well as other stone, renal and treatment factors were correlated with the stone-free rate using the Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Three months after shock wave lithotripsy 79 patients (73.1%) were free of stones. Mean lower infundibular length plus or minus standard deviation was 20.9 +/- 6.56 mm., mean infundibular width was 5.65 +/- 2.34 mm. and the mean lower pole infundibulopelvic angle was 48.33 +/- 14.84 degrees. In 49 (45.4%) and 59 (54.6%) patients infundibular length was greater than 3 cm. and 3 cm. or less, respectively. Infundibular width was greater than 5 mm. and 5 mm. or less in 45 (41.7%) and 63 (58.3%) patients, respectively. No obtuse infundibulopelvic angles were noted. None of the 3 lower pole anatomical factors had any significant impact on the stone-free rate at 3 months. Renal morphology was the only factor significantly affecting the stone-free rate since stone clearance was significantly less in pyelonephritic kidneys (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the intrarenal anatomy of the lower pole have no significant impact on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy. Further examination of the lower pole renal anatomy with a search for other contributing factors is still warranted.     

Lower pole ratio: A new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy?

BACKGROUND: Lower pole spatial anatomy is an important determinant of success after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. In the present study, we determine whether there is a significant relationship between lower pole ratio (infundibular length : infundibular width) on preoperative intravenous urograms and stone fragment clearances after shockwave lithotripsy. METHODS: A total of 42 patients with isolated lower pole stones were retrospectively reviewed. Anatomical factors, such as infundibular length, width and infundibulopelvic angle were measured and the lower pole ratio was calculated on pretreatment intravenous urogram. Stone fragment clearance was assessed at three months with a plain abdominal X-ray. RESULTS: The overall three-month stone-free rate was 62%. Mean stone size +/- SD was 10 +/- 4.8 mm, mean infundibular length was 21.7 +/- 6.9 mm, mean infundibular width was 6.1 +/- 2.3 mm, mean infundibulopelvic angle was 62.1 +/- 30.1 degrees and mean lower pole ratio was 4.3 +/- 2.8. Stone-free status after shockwave lithotripsy was significantly related to infundibular length and width as well as to lower pole ratio, but not to infundibulo-pelvic angle. Infundibular length less than 30 mm, width greater than 5 mm and lower pole ratio less than 3.5 were noted to have an improved three-month stone-free rate (P = 0.049, 0.01 and <0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Caliceal anatomy is an important consideration for lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy. The present study suggests that a lower pole ratio of less than 3.5, which considers both infundibular length and width, is a promising predictor for stone-free status.     

Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy

PURPOSE: We evaluate the significance of inferior caliceal radiographic anatomy and determine its influence on successful fragmentation and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1996 and February 1998, 88 patients and 90 renal units with single or multiple inferior caliceal calculi of all sizes and composition were treated with ESWL. The size, number and area of calculi, length and width of the stone bearing inferior calix and infundibulopelvic angle were determined on pretreatment excretory urography. The infundibulopelvic angle was measured by 2 methods using the angle between the inferior caliceal infundibular and ureteral axes (angle 1), and between the infundibular and ureteropelvic axes (angle 2). Cases with residual fragments not clearing within 6 months of satisfactory fragmentation after lithotripsy were considered failures. RESULTS: Overall stone clearance at 6 months was achieved in about 72% of the renal units. Infundibular length was 30 mm. or less in 77% of successful cases and in 64% of failures. Similarly, the smallest infundibular width of 5 mm. or more was found in 75% of successful cases compared to 41% of failures. Angle 1 of 35 degrees or more was observed in 73% of cases with compared to 18% without clearance. Angle 2 of 45 degrees or more was seen in 71% of successful cases compared to 9% of failures. The chances of a patient becoming stone-free with all favorable criteria of infundibular length 30 mm. or less, infundibular width 5 mm. or greater and infundibular ureteropelvic angle 45 degrees or greater was 100% (23 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic features of a stone bearing inferior calix and its relation to the renal pelvis can be easily measured on standard excretory urography. An infundibular width of 5 mm. or more and infundibulopelvic angle 1 of 35 degrees or more or angle 2 of 45 degrees or more were statistically significant factors of radiographic anatomy in stone clearance following ESWL. Inferior caliceal length was not statistically significant, although length of 30 mm. or less appeared to be more favorable for stone clearance. The ideal treatment of inferior caliceal calculi in patients with all 3 favorable criteria is ESWL.     

Usefulness of lower ihfundibular length-to-diameter ratio as a predictor of lower pole stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; clinical research with two lithotriptors

PURPOSE: Lower pole renal stones are well known to exhibit a poor stone clearance rate following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). In the present study, we analyzed several anatomical factors as predictors of lower pole stone clearance that may be used to indicate the usefulness and the universality of ESWL in such patients with two different lithotriptors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 93 patients with a unilateral single lower pole stone of 2 cm. or less underwent ESWL using Piezolith 2500 or Medstone STS, were included in the study. An IVP was used to determine the lower infundibulopelvic angle, the caliceal pelvic height, the lower infundibular length, the lower infundibular diameter, the lower infundibular length-to-diameter ratio and the number of lower pole minor calyces. Stone-free status was assessed by a plain film with or without renal ultrasound. RESULTS: The stone clearance rate at the Piezolith 2500 group was 53.1% (34 of 64 patients), while was 51.7% (15 of 29 patients) at the Medstone STS group. In all cases, the overall stone clearance rate was 52.7% (49 of 93 patients). Age, laterality of the stone burden within the kidney and stone size were not different between the stone-free and residual stone groups. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that length-to-diameter ratio was the most independent predictors of successful stone clearance at each group. The patients exhibited length-to-diameter ratio less than 7 achieved high stone clearance rates, greater than 72%. In contrast, the stone clearance rate was less than one third when length-to-diameter ratio was 7 or greater. Besides length-to-diameter ratio was strong prognostic factor in patients with stones 1 cm. or less and 1 to 2 cm at each group. CONCLUSION: From this study, it is apparent that successful ESWL is highly sensitive to the anatomy of the lower pole of the kidney. Especially, the lower infundibular length-to-diameter ratio is potentially useful and a universal predictor regardless of the kind of lithotriptors at least in patients with a lower pole radiopaque stone 2 cm. or less treated with ESWL.     

Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower calyceal stone: a statistical model

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of inferior calyceal radiographic anatomy, number of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) sessions and stone size on the successful clearance of solitary inferior calyceal calculi after ESWL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study between January 2001 and November 2002, 66 renal units with a solitary inferior calyceal calculus of < or = 2 cm were treated with electrohydraulic ESWL. The infundibulopelvic angle (two definitions), infundibulovertebral angle, inferior calyceal infundibular diameter, infundibular length, cortical thickness over the lower pole, number of minor calyces and stone size were determined from intravenous urography before treatment. The number of ESWL sessions was also included in the analysis. Treatments which produced residual fragments not clearing within 3 months of satisfactory fragmentation were considered as failures. All patients in whom the treatment failed were treated successfully by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The data were then analysed using two different statistical methods; first by intravariable differences using the test of proportion (Fisher's test) and then all the variables together using logistic regression. RESULTS: At 3 months 78.8% of the renal units were clear of stone. All intravariable differences were statistically significant except stone size (<1 cm, 1-2 cm). In a multivariate analysis of all variables, only stone size was the most important predictor for successful stone clearance (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ESWL is the initial treatment of choice in selected patients with inferior calyceal stones. The stone size appears to be the most important predictor for stone clearance.     

Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network

PURPOSE: We performed this study as a comprehensive evaluation of variables reported to affect lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using artificial neural network analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiographic images and treatment records of 680 patients with lower pole renal calculi treated with primary shock wave lithotripsy using the Wolf Piezolith 2500 (Wolf, Knittlingen, Germany) lithotriptor were retrospectively evaluated by applying artificial neural network analysis. Successful stone clearance was defined as absent fragments of any size detected on plain x-ray with tomography and/or excretory pyelography performed 6 months after treatment. Prognostic variables included patient characteristics, laboratory values, stone characteristics and the spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by infundibular length, diameter, caliceal pelvic height, 2 measurements of the lower infundibulopelvic and infundibuloureteropelvic angles as well as the pattern of dynamic urinary transport. RESULTS: Artificial neural network analysis had 92% accuracy for correctly predicting lower pole stone clearance. The pattern of dynamic urinary transport represented the most influential predictor of stone clearance, followed by a measure of the infundibuloureteropelvic angle, body mass index, caliceal pelvic height and stone size. Anatomical measurements of lower pole anatomy and classification of the type of urinary transport were well reproducible with low intra-observer and interobserver variability (correlation coefficient alpha >0.8). CONCLUSIONS: In a comprehensive analysis of variables reported to influence lower pole stone clearance artificial neural network analysis predicted stone clearance with a high degree of accuracy. The relative importance of dynamic urinary transport in lower pole stones and the usefulness of artificial neural network analysis to predict shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in individuals must be confirmed in a prospective trial.     

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Lower Calyx Calculi: How Much Is Treatment Outcome Influenced by the Anatomy of the Collecting System?

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of lower calyx stones has been criticized because of the high incidence of residual fragments. Controversial results have been reported regarding the stone-free rate after ESWL depending on the influence of the collecting system anatomy on stone clearance. Therefore we evaluated our stone-free rate after ESWL of lower calyx stones and searched for correlations to various anatomic parameters of the collecting system. METHODS: Ninety-six patients with isolated lower calyx stones treated exclusively with ESWL (Dornier HM3) were evaluated 3 mo postoperatively. The results were correlated with the following anatomic parameters of the collecting system as determined from the pretreatment intravenous urography: (1) lower infundibulum width, (2) lower infundibulum length, (3) infundibulopelvic angle, (4) volume of the collecting system. Follow-ups were performed 24 h after ESWL with an abdominal plain film and 3 mo postoperatively with a urography or abdominal plain X-ray together with renal ultrasound. RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, 68% of all patients were stone free, including 69% of the patients with stones initially < or =1 cm, and 67% of the patients with stones >1 cm. Stone-free patients compared with patients having residual fragments had no significant differences in infundibulum width, infundibulum length, infundibulopelvic angle, or collecting system volume. CONCLUSIONS: A stone-free rate 3 mo after ESWL of 68% overall justifies ESWL as a possible treatment option for lower calyx stones. Influence of the collecting system anatomy on disintegrate clearance from the lower calyx could not be demonstrated.     

Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?

PURPOSE: The management of lower pole kidney stones is controversial. We examined whether lower pole caliceal anatomy could predict the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of primary lower pole kidney stones 20 mm. or less. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 1997 to June 2001, 246 adults with a single, 20 mm. or less radiopaque lower pole renal stone were treated with the Doli 50 lithotriptor (Dornier Medical Systems, Marietta, Georgia) while under general anesthesia. Of the 246 patients 190 (77%) had excretory urography available for review. Lower pole infundibular length and width, lower pole infundibulopelvic angle and caliceal-pelvic height were measurable on 161 (85%), 129 (68%), 128 (67%) and 163 (86%) excretory urograms, respectively. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was considered a failure if residual stone fragments remained after 1 month, or an auxiliary procedure or re-treatment was required.RESULTS The overall stone-free rate was 78% (32 of 41) for stones 5 mm. or less, 73% (98 of 135) for stones 6 to 10 mm., 43% (22 of 51) for stones 11 to 15 mm. and 30% (7 of 19) for stones 16 to 20 mm. in maximum linear dimension. The stone-free rates grouped according to stone surface area were 76% (48 of 63 stones) for stone surface area 25 mm.2 or less, 69% (97 of 141) for 26 to 100 mm.2 and 33% (14 of 42) for 101 to 400 mm.2. Caliceal anatomy was not predictive of success even with stones grouped as 10 or less or 11 to 20 mm. Grouping patients with favorable (lower pole infundibulopelvic angle 70 degrees or greater, lower pole infundibular length 30 mm. or less and lower pole infundibular width greater than 5 mm.) versus unfavorable (70 degrees or less, greater than 30 mm. and 5 mm. or less, respectively) anatomy was also not predictive of success. CONCLUSIONS: On the Doli 50 machine stone size rather than caliceal anatomy is predictive of treatment outcome. Initial treatment failures with this machine should be managed by alternative endoscopic procedures if necessary rather than by repeat shock wave lithotripsy.     

Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)

We determined whether the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features on the preoperative urography (IVP) are enough to predict fragments clearance after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). A Total of 282 patients with mean age 45.8 ± 13.2 years (189 male, 93 female), who underwent SWL due to renal calculi between October 2005 and August 2009 were enrolled. The mean calculi load was 155.72 ± 127.66 mm2. The patients were stratified into three groups: patients with pelvis calculi (group 1); patients with upper or middle pole calculi (group 2) and patients with lower pole calculi (group 3). Three angles on the pretreatment IVP were measured: the inner angle between the axis of the lower pole infundibular and ureteropelvic axis (angle I); the inner angle between the lower pole infundibular axis and main axis of pelvis-ureteropelvic (UP) junction point (angle II) and the inner angle between the lower pole infundibular axis and perpendicular line (angle III). Multivariate analysis was used to define the significant predictors of stone clearance. The overall success rate was 85.81%. All angles, sessions number, shock waves number and stone burden were significant predictors of success in patients in group 1. However, in group 2 only angle II and in group 3 angles I and II had significant effect on stone clearance. Radiographic anatomic features have significant role in determining the stone-free rate following satisfactory fragmentation of renal stones with SWL. The measurement of infundibulopelvic angle in different manner helps to predict the stone-free status in patients with renal calculi located not only in lower pole, but also in renal pelvis and upper or middle pole. Gravity effect is not enough to justify the significant influence of the radiographic anatomic features on the stone clearance and fragments retention after SWL.     

Factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi in children

The aim of the study was to analyse factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children with renal calculi. We performed a retrospective analysis reviewing records of 85 (40 female, 45 male) children (89 renal units) subjected to ESWL for treatment of renal calculi during 1990–2005 in our department. As 4 patients had bilateral calculi and 19 children (21 renal units) had renal stones at more than one different site, each location was analysed separately for convenience. The mean age of the patients was 10.3±4.6 (2–16) years. The stone-free rates for renal pelvis, lower, middle and upper caliceal calculi were 70, 62, 50 and 73%, respectively. A higher rate (33%) of insignificant fragments (≤4 mm) was noted for lower pole calculi. Increased stone diameter (P=0.0001) and burden (P=0.04) were found as the most significant factors that adversely affect the stone-free rate for pelvis renalis calculi, whereas an acutely oriented infundibulum and/or a long lower infundibulum (P=0.005) were unfavourable factors for clearance of lower caliceal stones. The stone-free rate in children with multiple calculi was 48%, while 29% of the renal units had retained fragments. ESWL is a good initial option for treatment of most of the renal calculi <2 cm except in the presence of unfavourable lower caliceal anatomy. Increased stone burden, multiple stones, staghorn calculi, narrow lower infundibulopelvic angle and long lower infundibulum are factors that adversely affect the clearance rate.     

The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors affecting stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children with lower calyceal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lower pole stone clearance was reviewed in 34 patients aged between 2 and 16 years (23 boys and 11 girls) treated with ESWL between 1989 and 2001 in our clinic. Renal anatomy was determined on standard intravenous urograms. The lower infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) was measured by two different methods based either on measuring the angle between vertical pelvis axis and vertical axis of lower infundibulum or finding the angle between the ureteropelvic axis and vertical axis of lower infundibulum. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 12.1+/-4.16 (2-16) years. The mean stone burden was found as 96.93+/-87.13 mm(2) and the mean shock wave number per session and power as 2631.4+/-593.1 and 17.57+/-1.1 kV, respectively. The stone-free rate was 55.9%. Fifteen (44.1%) cases had residual fragments retained in lower calices after lithotripsy and are still followed. The stone clearance was found to be unrelated to stone burden and infundibulum width (p=0.44 and p=0.34, respectively). However, a significant difference was present between mean lower pole infundibular length (p=0.0032) and lower IPA measurements according to both methods between stone-free cases and others. The most remarkable factor that had a significant influence on stone clearance was an acutely oriented infundibulum defined according to IPA-ureteropelvic axis angle determination method (p=0.00001) followed by Sampaio's pelvic axis method (p=0.0001). Only 1 (5%) patient was stone-free under 40 degrees and 1 (6%) case with an angle of 45 degrees had residual fragments in the former method. Similarly none of the cases had residual fragments over 90 degrees for Sampaio's method and 90% of the stone-free cases had a more obtuse angle. Thus, we determined that a cut-off point of 40 degrees for the IPA-ureteropelvic axis method and 90 degrees for Sampaio's method was most useful to determine the clearance of lower pole fragments. CONCLUSION: The factors affecting stone clearance in paediatric patients are similar to adults.     

The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy

The goal of this study was to determine the factors affecting stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower caliceal stones. Lower pole stone clearance was investigated in 128 (80 males, 48 females) patients treated with ESWL during 1998–2003 in our clinic. Renal anatomy was determined on standard intravenous urogram. The lower infundibulopelvic angle (LIPA) was measured as the angle between the vertical pelvis axis and the vertical axis of lower infundibulum (Sampaio’s method). The mean age of the patients was 42.8 ± 12.4 (19–77) years. The mean stone diameter and burden were found to be 1.28 ± 0.58 (0.5–3.5) cm and 1.2 ± 1 (0–7) cm² respectively. The stone-free rate was 62.5% and ESWL was unsuccessful in 16 (12.5%) patients. Thirty-two (25%) patients had residual fragments ≤4 mm retained in lower calices after lithotripsy. The stone clearance was found to be unrelated to stone burden and diameter (P = 0.17 and P = 0.14, respectively). However, there was a significant difference between mean lower pole infundibulum length (P = 0.001), infundibulum width (P = 0.001) and LIPA (P = 0.0001) between stone-free patients and patients with residual fragments. Multivariate logistic regression analysis accepting stone-free as the favourable result also confirmed that LIPA, lower pole infundibulum length and width were factors that significantly affected the outcome. Lower pole anatomy has a significant influence on clearance of fragments after ESWL.     

Prediction of calculus clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of calculi in the inferior kidney calices. Application of the artificial neural network

The purpose of this retrospective study was to define prognostic factors which determine the stone clearance (SC) for lower caliceal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and to compare the prediction accuracy of artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) and standard computational methods. Since January 1995, 321 renal units in 310 patients with single or multiple inferior caliceal calculi of all sizes and compositions have been treated with ESWL (Lithotriptor: Piezolith 2500, Wolf company). The classification accuracy of ANNA in the test set was 94%, with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 92%, and a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.966, results significantly better than those yielded by a logistic regression analysis (classification accuracy 77%, sensitivity 75%, specificity 81%, and ROC curve area 0.779). Patients with lower renal caliceal stones appear to have the best chance of successful ESWL when their body mass index (BMI) and urinary transport (UT) are normal, the infundibular width (IW) is 5 mm or more, and the infundibular ureteropelvic angle (IUPA) is 45 degrees or more. Stone size and composition, as factors of SC, are not statistically significant. After determining the angle, width, and UT in patients with optimal age and body mass suitable for ESWL, SC can be achieved irrespective of stone size and composition.     

The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones

PURPOSE: The clearance rather than stone disintegration of lower pole stones after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is significantly inferior according to the other localizations of the kidney. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after SWL for pediatric lower pole stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 163 renal units (RUs) in children 16 years old or younger with SWL between March 1992 and February 2002. In 36 RUs stones were localized in the lower calices. All patients were treated with sedoanalgesia except 3 (8%) who were treated under general anesthesia. Patients were evaluated by excretory urography and ultrasonography 12 weeks after the last session, and were designated as stone-free or with residual stone. The lower infundibular length, width, length-to-width ratio, pelvic caliceal height and lower infundibulopelvic angle were determined on standard excretory urography before SWL. All measurements were done by 1 urologist who was unaware of the results. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. ROC analysis was done to determine the cutoff points of caliceal anatomy measurements for stone clearance. RESULTS: We treated 36 RUs in 23 males and 10 females with isolated lower caliceal stones. Median patient age was 10.5 years (range 2 to 16). Median stone burden was 0.7 cm (range 0.2 to 4), and median number of shock waves and energy used for the entire patient population was 1,500 and 17.2 kV, respectively. Overall stone-free rates for the 36 RUs were 61% after a median treatment session of 1 (range 1 to 7) and retreatment rates were 39%. Of the patients rendered free of stones 13 (59%) were treated in a single SWL session and 9 (41%) underwent 2 or more sessions. Median lower infundibular length, width, length-to-width ratio and pelvic caliceal height in the stone-free and residual stone group were 25.5, 28.0 mm, 4.5, 5.0 mm, 6.4, 5.5 mm and 21.5, 21.5 mm, respectively (p = 0.810, 0.327, 0.511 and 0.511). Median lower infundibulopelvic angle in the stone-free and residual stone groups was 92.50 and 92.50 degrees, and 60.0 and 54.50 degrees, respectively (p = 0.860 and 0.089). On ROC analysis no parameter predicting stone-free rate and cutoff points of caliceal anatomy measurements for stone clearance was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that caliceal pelvic anatomy in pediatric lower pole stones has no significant impact on stone clearance after SWL. There was a highly significant relation between retreatment rates and stone burden, which should be considered for determining the treatment modality.     

The impact of pelvicaliceal features on problematic lower pole stone clearance in different age groups

Aim Our aim was to evaluate the impact of pelvicaliceal variables in pediatric and adult age groups who underwent SWL for lower caliceal calculi. Methods 25 pediatric and 78 adult patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) between 1996 and 2004 were enrolled into the study after exclusion of patients with hydronephrosis, major renal anatomic anomalies, non-calcium stones, history of recurrent stone disease and previous renal surgery. Lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular length (IL), infundibular width (IW) and pelvicaliceal volume were measured from pre-SWL intravenous urography. The pelvicaliceal stone load (PSL) index implicating the stone burden of each patient described as the relationship between stone volume and total estimated pelvicaliceal volume for stone-bearing kidney was also calculated. Results Sixty-eight percent of adult and 80% of pediatric patients became stone-free after SWL. The statistical insignificance between PSL index (p = 0.097) of two groups shows that both groups shared a similar stone burden. According to SWL outcome, mean IPA values of stone-free and residual patients were 46.85° and 30° in pediatric group, respectively (p = 0.01), whereas these values were 48.08° and 43.06° in the adult group, respectively (p = 0.352). In the pediatric age group, stone-free and cumulative success rates increased with increasing IPA but this correlation was statistically insignificant (p: 0.263). Conclusions Lower caliceal anatomy has a higher impact on stone clearance after SWL in pediatric patients and urologists can expect better SWL outcomes from pediatric population with solitary lower caliceal stone than adults under the same conditions.     

Factors affecting lower calyceal stone clearance after Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

ObjectiveExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is one of the most commonly used procedures to remove renal calculi from the lower calyces. The aim of this work is to study the impact of radiological, anatomical and demographic factors on stone clearance after ESWL of lower calyceal calculi.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study included 150 patients aged between 16 and 70 years who were subjected to ESWL at October 6 University Hospital, Egypt, between June 2008 and October 2011. All the patients had solitary radio-opaque lower calyceal renal stones sized 2 cm or less. Intravenous urography (IVU) was performed to determine the patients’ lower-pole calyceal anatomy (infundibulum width, infundibulum length and the lower-pole infundibulopelvic angle). The patients who were divided into two groups according to the treatment results (Group 1: stone-free patients; Group 2: patients with residual fragments) were followed up for 3 months and re-assessed by plain X-ray.ResultsA total of 126 patients (84%) were stone-free (Group 1), while 24 patients (16%) had residual fragments (Group 2). The stone size was 0.5–1 cm in 76 patients (60.3%) and 1–2 cm in 50 patients (39.7%) of Group 1, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. In patients with a lower-pole infundibulopelvic angle ≥45°, stone clearance was 52% compared to a stone clearance of 32% in patients with a lower-pole infundibulopelvic angle <45° with no statistically significant difference. Regarding the infundibulum length (<35 mm vs. ≥35 mm) and width (<4 mm vs. ≥4 mm), no statistically significant difference was observed between Group 1 and Group 2. Ninety out of 106 patients (84.9%) with a body-mass index (BMI) ≤30 kg/m² were stone-free, compared to 36 out of 44 patients (81.8%) with a BMI > 30 kg/m².ConclusionsThere is no statistically significant effect of stone size, anatomy of the lower calyx and BMI on stone clearance after ESWL of lower calyceal stones. However, small stone size (≤2 cm), a shorter and wider infundibulum and a larger lower-pole infundibulopelvic angle seem to promote a more rapid and more complete stone clearance.     

The effect of intracalyceal distribution on the clearance of renal stones of > or = 20 mm in children after extracorporeal lithotripsy

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the intracalyceal distribution of renal stones on clearance rates after treating paediatric nephrolithiasis with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed a retrospective case series of children (aged < or = 14 years) undergoing lithotripsy on an MPL 9000 (Dornier GmbH, Germany) echo-guided lithotripter. Patients were identified using an international coding and indexing system and ESWL registry. In all, 125 children were treated during 1990-2003, but 21 had stones of > or = 20 mm. Stone clearance was assessed at 1 and 3 months, the stone-free state being defined as no radiological evidence of stone or fragments of < or = 3 mm. Failed treatments were analysed to identify any correlation with stone site. RESULTS: The overall stone-free rate was 81%; in four children the treatment failed (all girls) and subsequently they required ancillary procedures. Nineteen patients (90%) received up to three sessions of ESWL; two required four or more sessions. Of the four children in whom treatment failed, two had JJ stents; the stones were in the lower pole calyx in two, and the renal pelvis and lower pole calyx in two. The mean stone size in those where treatment failed was 25 mm, vs 21 mm in the stone-free group. The complication rate was 19%, but only one child required admission to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL is very effective for renal stones in children, with minimal morbidity. Lower pole and partial staghorn stones with a major component in the lower pole calyx should preferably be treated by a percutaneous approach.     

Clearance of lower-pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of anatomic factors, especially the angle of the lower-pole infundibulum, on stone clearance following shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in order to determine selection criteria for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients with single lower-pole stones measuring 11-20 mm treated with SWL. Intravenous urograms were reviewed to measure the infundibulopelvic angle, the angle of the infundibulum to the vertical, and the anatomy of lower-pole calyces. RESULTS: The overall stone-free rate was 52%. Factors most closely associated with a stone-free status were obtuse infundibulopelvic angle, lack of calyceal distortion, and a large infundibular diameter. The infundibulopelvic angle was the only factor to attain significance in predicting stone-free status (p = 0.012). The size of the stone did not predict eventual stone-free status (p = 0.911), but larger stones were more likely to require intervention after SWL. CONCLUSION: For solitary lower-pole stones 11-20 mm in size, the angle of the lower-pole infundibulum as it relates to the pelvis plays a role in eventual stone clearance and should be taken into account before choosing a mode of treatment.     

Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several anatomic factors influence the clearance of lower pole stones treated with shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). One of these is the infundibulopelvic angle, but its measurement is complex. METHODS: We proposed a more simple measure of caliceal dependence, the caliceal pelvic height (CPH), which we defined as the distance between a horizontal line from the lowermost point of the calix containing the stone to the highest point of the lower lip of the renal pelvis. RESULTS: In 62 patients who had SWL for solitary lower pole stones, a CPH < 15 mm was associated with a stone clearance rate of 92%, whereas with a CPH > or = 15 mm, the clearance rate was only 52% (p < 0.05). A majority (74%) of the patients with an infundibular width of > or = 5 mm were rendered stone free compared with 40% of those with a width of < 5 mm (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Measurement of the CPH, in conjunction with other anatomic factors, may more accurately predict the outcome of SWL in patients with lower pole stones.